Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

CA Talc Lawsuit Plaintiffs File Prop 65 Suit Against Retailers

CA Talc Lawsuit Plaintiffs File Prop 65 Suit Against Retailers

Johnson & Johnson, Bausch Health Co., Walgreens Co., Target and a number of other retailers were named defendants in a California Prop 65 talc lawsuit claiming that the companies failed to properly label talcum products with warnings that the talc products contained carcinogenic ingredients.

California Prop 65 requires retailers to properly label all carcinogenic ingredients containing products with warnings so that consumers are aware of the risks associated with the product.

According to the complaint, a multitude of research clearly shows talc – which is the main ingredient used in baby powders and body powders – is known to be contaminated with such carcinogens as lead, arsenic, and hexavalent chromium.

The plaintiffs claim that the defendants failed to meet these requirements, hiding the facts from “unsuspecting customers”. While these products do list “talc” as a primary ingredient, the complaint alleges that industry definition required of talc “expressly includes” trace amounts of arsenic, lead and hexavalent chromium.

“By including these carcinogens and reproductive toxins in the specification for ‘talc,’ the industry has misleadingly marketed talcum powder products as containing pure talc and has actively and knowingly taken steps to conceal the presence of [carcinogens] from consumers,” one plaintiff explained. “The industry has done so with a profiteering motive, knowing that full disclosure would lead to a significant loss in sales and, even more likely, the removal of talcum powder products from the market.”

Plaintiffs involved in the lawsuit are seeking an injunction that forces the defendants as well as other talc-product retailers to include a Prop 65 cancer warning on talc products.

Plaintiffs have also made a demand for damages, for which the amount remains disclosed.

This is a public health crisis that has gone unchecked for decades,” said the plaintiffs’ representative Trent Miracle of Simmons Hanly Conroy. “The defendants, who represent brands trusted by millions of consumers, have to be held accountable for causing so much harm and putting so many more people at risk.”

Other defendants named in the talc lawsuit include Dolgen LLC, Sanofi SA, Walmart, CVS Pharmacy Inc., and Davion Inc.

The lawsuit is filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles.

Share

Litigation Updates

EPA to broaden risk review of Asbestos

October 15, 2021

October 15, 2021

EPA to broaden risk review of Asbestos

Johnson & Johnson Fail to Rid of $2 Billion Verdict in Talc Products Lawsuit

November 4, 2020

November 4, 2020

Johnson & Johnson Fail to Rid of $2 Billion Verdict in Talc Products Lawsuit

New Jersey State Appeals Court Revives Two Lawsuits Alleging J&J Talc Caused Cancer

August 5, 2020

August 5, 2020

New Jersey State Appeals Court Revives Two Lawsuits Alleging J&J Talc Caused Cancer

Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

July 29, 2020

July 29, 2020

Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

Talcum Powder Cases Chosen in Talc-Ovarian Cancer Multidistrict Litigation

July 8, 2020

July 8, 2020

Talcum Powder Cases Chosen in Talc-Ovarian Cancer Multidistrict Litigation

Judge Upholds J&J $186 Million Punitive Award in Talc Asbestos Lawsuit

June 29, 2020

June 29, 2020

Judge Upholds J&J $186 Million Punitive Award in Talc Asbestos Lawsuit

CLIENT REVIEWS

quotation
Tom Lewis

TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.

quotation
Jordan Terry

TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.

quotation
Dave Woodley

All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.

quotation
Jordan Butler

I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!

quotation
Maddy Moeller

Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!

quotation
Karen Hersman

A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!

quotation
Angel Truesdale

They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!

quotation
Paul Graegin

The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.

quotation
Carie Terry

The attorneys at THL were extremely helpful with the legal aspects of setting up my small business.