AFFF Lawsuit FAQ: Can Employees of AFFF Foam Manufacturers File Claims?

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.A group of firefighters have filed a lawsuit against several major chemical companies, including 3M.

The lawsuit alleges severe health impacts from long-term exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF and is outside the current filings in the AFFF MDL, which is consolidated in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.

The 12 plaintiffs in this lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of Louisiana, claim exposure to AFFF has led to serious health issues, such as prostate cancer, leukemia, and kidney cancer.

Despite decades of research showing the harmful effects of PFAS, the companies allegedly failed to provide adequate warnings or implement safety measures, continuing to distribute the foam without consent.

The plaintiffs are seeking medical monitoring, injunctive relief, and accountability for the damage caused by AFFF.

Meanwhile, in Brunswick, Maine, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) continues its comprehensive testing following a significant AFFF spill that occurred in August 2024.

Ongoing soil and water sampling have shown PFAS contamination in local watersheds and marine environments, with some soil results showing elevated levels of PFAS.

Although water supplies have not been directly impacted, and public drinking water remains safe, the DEP has advised the public to avoid recreational activities in the affected areas.

Testing will continue, and further updates are expected as the cleanup progresses.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The ongoing AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) firefighting lawsuits have become a significant legal and environmental issue due to the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals.”

These chemicals, found in products like firefighting foam, have been linked to serious health risks, including cancer, and have contaminated water supplies in various locations.

Minnesota’s Regulatory Actions: For the first time, the state of Minnesota is requiring 3M to limit the amount of PFAS discharged into the Mississippi River from its Cottage Grove plant, following long-standing concerns about contamination of fish and water in the area.

The plant, which previously manufactured Scotchgard and now produces specialty tapes and chemicals, has a history of PFAS-related pollution issues, leading to drinking water contamination in the region.

Despite 3M’s plans to end PFAS production by 2025 and build a $300 million water treatment system, the company is challenging the new permit requirements, claiming they are legally unjustified.

Contamination in Grand Prairie, Texas: A firefighting foam spill in Grand Prairie led to potential water contamination affecting about 60,000 residents.

Although the foam used was said not to contain PFAS, residents were still advised to avoid using tap water due to the backflow issue, forcing businesses and schools to close temporarily.

The incident highlights the broader problem of firefighting foam contaminating water supplies and the need for better regulations to prevent such occurrences.

Cape Fear River Study: A new study from Cape Fear River Watch revealed that fish tissue samples from the Northeast Cape Fear River, near Kenansville, North Carolina, contain PFOS levels 20 times higher than state standards.

THe PFOS, part of the PFAS “forever chemicals,” have been linked to severe health risks, including cancer and developmental defects.

Lear’s Textile Company, located nearby, has acknowledged using PFAS in their manufacturing process and is working with state regulators to phase out the chemicals.

Locals are now avoiding recreational activities in the river due to contamination concerns

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit involves claims against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used by firefighters.

More than 1,400 gallons of firefighting foam containing toxic PFAS, also known as forever chemicals, accidentally spilled at an airplane hanger in Maine.

The spill occurred when an outdated fire suppression system at Hangar 4, located at the Brunswick Executive Airport, discharged unexpectedly, filling the hangar and nearby areas with foam.

This foam contains toxic chemicals known as PFAS, which have been linked to serious health issues.

The AFFF Lawsuit seeks compensation for those affected by exposure to these harmful substances.

In August, the number of filings within the federal AFFF MDL was 9,525.

By September 1st, the number of filings has increased to 9,576.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing

Over 1,600 gallons of firefighting foam containing harmful PFAS chemicals were accidentally discharged at the former Brunswick Naval Air Base, now operating as Brunswick Executive Airport, due to a fire suppression system malfunction.

The foam, designed to extinguish jet fuel fires, entered the sewer and stormwater systems, leading to significant environmental contamination.

Nearby nature preserves were impacted, with foam reaching depths of four to eight feet in some ponds, according to Steve Walker from the Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust.

Cleanup efforts by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection are ongoing, but concerns remain about the long-term environmental impact, as these chemicals are known for their persistence in nature and links to serious health risks.

PFAS chemicals in AFFF are at the center of ongoing lawsuits, where plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the health and environmental damages caused by these toxic substances.

The Brunswick spill could potentially contribute to the growing litigation surrounding PFAS contamination and its harmful effects on the environment and the people within the environment.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey recently signed a law that mandates the phase-out of PFAS chemicals in firefighters’ protective gear, a significant development in the ongoing litigation involving Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) and the toxic effects of PFAS.

The law, effective from January 2025, requires manufacturers and sellers to disclose the presence of PFAS in firefighting equipment and provide justifications for its inclusion.

By 2027, the sale of protective gear containing intentionally-added PFAS will be prohibited.

PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been linked to serious health conditions, including various cancers.

Firefighters, who are at a higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population, have been particularly affected due to prolonged exposure to these chemicals in their gear and the use of AFFF in firefighting operations.

The impact of this legislation is likely to influence the ongoing AFFF lawsuits, which allege that PFAS exposure from firefighting foam and gear has caused significant health problems.

With Massachusetts enacting one of the nation’s strongest PFAS regulations, this law could set a precedent for similar actions in other states, potentially affecting the outcomes of AFFF-related litigations.

Firefighter unions and advocacy groups, such as the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), have long campaigned against the use of PFAS in firefighting equipment, citing the chemical’s role in causing occupational cancers.

The new law is a response to these concerns and reflects a growing recognition of the dangers.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly. 

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

States across the nation are increasing efforts to address the dangers of PFAS chemicals in firefighting gear and foams.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals resistant to breaking down in the environment and are linked to significant health risks, including liver and kidney damage, reproductive harm, and certain cancers.

The Massachusetts State Senate has passed a bill banning PFAS in firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE), set to take effect on January 1, 2027.

This legislation aims to eliminate PFAS from the protective gear worn by firefighters, addressing the growing concern over the health risks associated with prolonged exposure to these chemicals.

Firefighter unions are advocating for the state’s House of Representatives to expedite the bill’s passage and present it to Governor Healey before the close of the legislative session.

In Alaska, a new law has been enacted requiring fire departments to cease using PFAS-containing firefighting foams by January 1, 2025.

This law, which took effect without the governor’s signature, mandates a transition to PFAS-free alternatives and establishes a system for rural villages to dispose of existing PFAS foams, with financial reimbursement provided by the state.

This legislation reflects years of advocacy by environmental and health organizations and represents a significant step in addressing PFAS contamination, particularly in areas surrounding airports and military bases where these foams have been extensively used.

Two more fire departments in Connecticut, Stamford and Old Mystic, have joined a federal lawsuit against 3M and DuPont.

The lawsuit alleges that the companies’ turnout gear, used by firefighters, contains PFAS chemicals that pose cancer risks.

This legal action, which includes several other Connecticut departments and firefighter unions, may be the first of its kind in the nation, highlighting the increasing legal challenges faced by manufacturers of PFAS-containing products.

In relation to the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL, the litigation saw an increase of more than 300 cases in the past month.

9,525 pending AFFF Lawsuits were reported by the JPML on August 1.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly. 

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Senate Appropriations Committee approved a transportation spending bill allocating $70 million to help airports transition to PFAS-free firefighting foams.

This funding is significantly higher than the House’s proposed $5 million.

Congress must reconcile the differences between the two versions of the T-HUD Fiscal Year 2025 Appropriations Bill.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and human body and are linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and immune system damage.

Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting contains PFAS and can contaminate water supplies near airports.

Earlier this year, the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization law established a five-year, $350 million grant program to aid airports in transitioning away from PFAS-containing foams.

The Senate T-HUD bill fully funds the program’s first year at $70 million and allocates $4.52 billion for airport infrastructure and safety improvements, and emissions reductions.

PFAS-free firefighting foams have been available since 2019, with over 100 fluorine-free options from 24 manufacturers meeting international aviation standards.

These alternatives are safe, effective, and ready for adoption by the military and U.S. airports.

Decades of using PFAS-laden foams have contaminated drinking and groundwater near airports.

The transition to PFAS-free foams is crucial for mitigating further environmental and health risks.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The federal Judge overseeing the Firefighting Foam MDL has selected nine cases involving Pennsylvania residents with kidney or testicular cancer and Colorado residents with thyroid cancer or ulcerative colitis to go to trial.

Other key developments in the AFFF Lawsuit include: 

• The Plaintiffs’ strategy reduced the number of required depositions and expert reports.

• Lawyers are pushing for more trial dates to expedite settlements.

• The Air Force is transitioning to a fluorine-free formulation (F3) in response to the AFFF Lawsuit.

• The Department of Defense is said to be “behind” on its goal to phase out AFFF.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing as the government is taking steps to eliminate the use of firefighting foam. 

A mechanical malfunction at the Alaska Army National Guard Aviation Facility in Bethel caused a release of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS chemicals on June 25, 2024.

Approximately ten gallons of AFFF were released due to a fire suppression system malfunction, impacting the facility’s boiler room, hangar bay floor, and a small area outside.

The Alaska National Guard environmental team is hiring a PFAS-trained contractor for sample testing and ongoing site monitoring.

Additionally, The Seneca Army Depot, now a Superfund site, has known PFAS contamination in its groundwater due to the historical use of AFFF.

Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) request for PFAS testing in these creeks, the Army has not planned immediate testing, opting to sample off-base receptors only if PFAS migration is observed.

The EPA, after consultations with the Army, removed the testing request from its website, continuing discussions on PFAS remediation with the Army Corps of Engineers.

Seneca County has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging PFAS contamination from the depot has damaged its drinking water supply.

The lawsuit asserts that AFFF used at the depot for decades has contaminated the water supply with PFAS compounds.

The Waterloo water plant’s 2023 report shows PFOA levels at 4.24 ppt, disputing higher contamination levels cited in the lawsuit.

The plant is upgrading its filtering systems to address PFAS contamination, with costs expected to exceed $12 million.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and later developed complications, you could be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering.

Contact TorHoerman Law AFFF Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF Foam Lawsuit instantly. 

The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing as the government is taking steps to eliminate the use of the firefighting foam.

The Department of Defense (DOD) is actively working to eliminate the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) at its installations due to the significant health risks posed by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in AFFF.

PFAS exposure has been linked to adverse health effects, including impacts on fetal development, the immune system, the thyroid, liver damage, and cancer.

Under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the DOD must discontinue the use of AFFF by October 1, 2024, with possible waivers extending to October 1, 2026, except for shipboard use.

The DOD has developed plans and schedules for replacing AFFF in all land-based mobile assets and facilities worldwide.

This includes creating specifications for a fluorine-free foam alternative to meet fire extinguishing performance standards.

However, the transition faces several challenges, including compatibility issues with existing firefighting systems, substantial funding requirements estimated at over $2.1 billion, and the need for extensive training for DOD firefighters in the use of fluorine-free foams.

Despite these obstacles, the DOD remains committed to phasing out AFFF and transitioning to safer alternatives.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and later developed complications, you could be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering.

Contact TorHoerman Law AFFF Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF Foam Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing. 

The AFFF lawsuit addresses claims related to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting, containing harmful chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

These chemicals are linked to severe health issues, including cancer.

In June, there were 8,270 AFFF lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 9,198.

PFAS in AFFF persists in the environment and human body, causing long-term health problems such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system issues.

Firefighters and exposed communities are at significant risk, leading to more individuals joining the AFFF lawsuit.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

The Firefighting Foam lawsuit is ongoing. 

Connecticut firefighters, represented by the Uniformed Professional Fire Fighters Association of Connecticut, filed a class action lawsuit against DuPont, 3M, Honeywell, and 16 other defendants.

The lawsuit claims that the protective gear used by firefighters was contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” which are linked to cancer.

The lawsuit, filed in the New Haven federal court, targets firefighter gear containing PFAS.

Plaintiffs, including five other unions and five individual firefighters, allege that PFAS in jackets, pants, and other turnout gear were absorbed through the skin, ingestion, and inhalation.

This absorption rate increases with rising temperatures and sweat buildup, leading to an increased risk of adverse health conditions.

The lawsuit demands at least $5 million in damages for violations of Connecticut product liability law.

DuPont and 3M produced the PFAS used in the gear, while a Honeywell subsidiary sold the gear without warning firefighters of the risks.

DuPont stated the lawsuit is without merit, while 3M indicated its intention to defend itself or settle as appropriate.

Honeywell did not respond to requests for comment.

PFAS, used in many products, are dubbed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the human body or the environment and have been linked to various health issues.

Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, who are commonly active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers.

If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A federal judge in South Carolina has provisionally approved a $750 million settlement agreement involving Tyco Fire Products LP, a subsidiary of Johnson Controls International PLC, to address claims from public water systems concerning PFAS contamination.

The lawsuit alleged that PFAS contamination in certain water systems originated from Tyco’s aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) products used in firefighting.

This agreement is part of a larger multidistrict litigation (MDL) that has previously seen major settlements, including a $12.5 billion settlement with 3M Co. and a $1.2 billion settlement involving DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva.

The class affected by this settlement includes public water systems that have detected PFAS in their water sources as of mid-May.

The MDL has more than 10,000 cases concerning damages due to PFAS. 

However, the settlement does not conclude all issues within the broader AFFF litigation, leaving several categories of claims unresolved.

The claims fall into five categories:

1. Public water providers requesting tests and remediation for drinking water
2. Individuals who have suffered health problems due to AFFF exposure
3. Individuals requesting medical monitoring
4. Property owners seeking contamination cleanup costs
5. States claiming damages to natural resources

Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, who are commonly active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers.

If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The AFFF Lawsuit addresses the harmful impacts of PFAS chemicals found in firefighting foams, which were widely used by the US Military and airports for decades.

209 new cases were added to the AFFF MDL in the past month, totaling 8,270 cases pending as of June 1st.

PFAS chemicals in AFFF are associated with serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system disruption.

Commonly known as “forever chemicals”, these toxic substances persist in the human body and environment.

PFAS contamination of local water sources stemming from the use of AFFF is a significant issue nationwide, particularly near US Military bases.

Recent advancements, such as Battelle’s “The Annihilator,” which uses supercritical water oxidation technology, have shown promise in destroying PFAS compounds in contaminated wastewater and firefighting foams.

Advances in remediation technology are critical in removing PFAS from the environment.

Our AFFF Lawyers are accepting new clients who suffered from exposure to toxic firefighting foam. 

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other related health problems, contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly. 

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and governmental remediation efforts. 

The AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) Lawsuit highlights significant environmental and health risks associated with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), focusing on direct exposure to AFFF as well as contamination of U.S. water supplies.

PFAS are recognized for their indestructible nature in the environment, often referred to as “forever chemicals.”

The AFFF Lawsuit claims that 3M and other manufacturers failed to disclose the dangers associated with PFAS, which studies have linked to cancer and other serious health issues.

The Department of Defense began utilizing PFAS-containing foams in the 1970s, primarily for extinguishing oil and gas fires at military sites and airports.

However, as reported by ABC News, it wasn’t until decades later that the extent of PFAS water pollution was acknowledged, leading to its widespread detection in public water systems.

PFAS have been detected in 5,000 communities, in all 50 states, and have put 60 million Americans at risk.

Legal actions now aim to force PFAS manufacturers to fund comprehensive clean-up operations.

These include the installation of advanced water filtration systems designed to remove PFAS from affected water supplies – a costly but necessary measure to mitigate public health risks.

Advancements in firefighting technology have led to the development of PFAS-free foams.

There are now multiple foams that claim to be fluorine free, further testing has proved that these new foams can effectively extinguish liquid fuel fires.

Though PFAS free, the new foams have some drawbacks, they are dependent on “foam quality” meaning more foam must be discharged in ideal conditions to achieve the same results.

Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, typically active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers 

If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly. 

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, with an increase in cases filed related to the firefighting foam litigation.

More than 300 new AFFF Lawsuits have been added to the MDL, with a total of 8,061 cases now pending in the litigation according to the latest filings from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

AFFF has been widely used in firefighting training and responses, particularly at military and civilian airports.

Plaintiffs in the AFFF Lawsuit claim that exposure to PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) through AFFF has led to serious health issues, including cancer.

The AFFF Lawsuit targets manufacturers who, plaintiffs claim, knew about the dangers of exposure to AFFF but failed to warn users, putting their health at risk.

Firefighters, military personnel, and airport workers are among the most affected.

If you or a loved one have developed cancer or other health problems after being exposed to AFFF, contact us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

Tyco Fire Products has agreed to a $750 million settlement in AFFF litigation involving the contamination of public water systems affected by PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).

PFAS chemicals are known for their persistence in the environment and potentially severe health implications, including cancer and other illnesses.

This settlement follows other settlements with companies like 3M and Dupont, proving the continued legal push to manage the environmental and health risks associated with these chemicals.

The agreement, still pending court approval in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, aims to provide the necessary compensation to enhance water treatment infrastructure.

While this settlement involves public water systems impacted by PFAS-containing firefighting foam, the AFFF Lawsuit for personal injuries and cancer is ongoing and has not yet been settled. 

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit.

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF litigation continues to develop.

As of April 1st, there are now 7,738 AFFF lawsuits pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.

This marks a significant increase from the 7,170 AFFF lawsuits reported as of March 1st.

The rise in the number of cases can largely be ascribed to heightened awareness and individuals learning of their options to seek compensation for exposure to firefighting foam.

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been commonly used in several branches of the military and by firefighters due to its effectiveness in combating fuel-based fires.

However, concerns have risen over the health impacts of substances contained in AFFF.

The heart of these lawsuits lies in the claims that exposure to the chemicals in AFFF, particularly PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), may be linked to a number of serious health conditions.

Those who have had prolonged contact with AFFF, including many firefighters and military personnel, are particularly at risk and have been at the forefront of raising these concerns.

If you or someone you know has been in contact with AFFF and have experienced related health problems, it’s recommended that you contact an attorney to assess your options. 

Do not hesitate to contact our law firm for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to connect with our AFFF Lawyers. 

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.

The AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) litigation is moving forward through the establishment of a procedural framework aimed at analyzing the scientific basis of claims that the foam’s chemicals cause liver and thyroid cancer.

A crucial component of this process is the upcoming “Science Day,” where experts will brief the MDL judge on relevant scientific and medical evidence, which are at the center of these cases.

This litigation phase includes selecting specific liver and thyroid cancer cases for the bellwether process, which simulates trial conditions to predict jury response to evidence and testimonies.

Critical deadlines have been set for the parties to exchange scientific studies supporting or contesting the cancer claims, culminating in the Science Day presentations.

Following this, a 60-day window is allocated for establishing a detailed plan for proceeding with these bellwether trials.

This all comes after the 3M Company settled water contamination claims with local water suppliers for  over $10.3 billion.

Cancer claims due to AFFF exposure remain pending and have not been settled yet.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit. 

Contact our law firm for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit. 

Currently, a total of 7,170 AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) Lawsuits are pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.

Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) are legal procedures in the United States designed to handle multiple related civil lawsuits that involve similar issues, facts or defendants.

When numerous individuals or entities file lawsuits related to a common set of circumstances, such as product liability, pharmaceuticals, or mass tort cases, these cases can be consolidated into a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings.

The AFFF MDLs aims to streamline the litigation process by centralizing the discovery process, reducing duplication of efforts, and ensuring consistent rulings on key legal issues.

The increase of 176 cases in the previous month illustrates the continued momentum of the AFFF MDL case.

A previous settlement deal was reached that addressed water contamination cases, but the litigation surrounding individual exposure to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) is ongoing.

If you or someone you know has suffered injuries due to AFFF, it’s important to explore your legal options

TorHoerman Law is here to offer guidance and support.

Use the chatbot feature on this page to automatically determine your eligibility for the AFFF Lawsuit.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.

DuPont, 3M, and other major manufacturers of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have agreed to a settlement worth over $1 billion in litigation involving local governments and utilities across the country whose water was contaminated by forever chemicals.

PFAS are known as forever chemicals as they do not break down in the environment.

When these chemicals are used, the runoff can move through soils and contaminate drinking water sources.

These cancer-causing chemicals are contained in Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF).

AFFFs have been used to combat liquid-fueled fires and are commonly used on military bases, airports, chemical plants, and fire stations.

PFAS do not break down in the environment or in the human body.

When exposed to these chemicals, humans have an increased chance of developing cancer as well as other health risks.

The plaintiffs in the AFFF Litigation are not only water providers and property owners, but also individuals with personal injury claims against the companies.

The settlement mentioned above will serve as a collective fund for public water systems that have been contaminated by PFAS.

Individual lawsuits for AFFF exposure are ongoing and have not yet been resolved, but AFFF Lawyers are optimistic that the lawsuits will be resolved soon.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.

Connecticut’s Attorney General has filed two lawsuits against 28 chemical manufacturers, alleging that they knowingly contaminated the state’s waters and natural resources with PFAS chemicals.

The lawsuits seek to hold these companies accountable for PFAS contamination originating from two sources: the Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting, and PFAS used in manufacturing and added to consumer products like food packaging, cookware, carpeting, upholstery, clothing, and cosmetics.

PFAS can persist indefinitely in the environment and is known to cause severe health problems, including various cancers, liver damage, birth defects, high cholesterol, infertility, and diabetes.

The lawsuits aim to obtain injunctive and monetary relief, requiring the companies to dispose of their toxic chemical stocks, abate pollution in Connecticut, disclose research, and compensate the state for remediation and testing expenses.

The complaints also seek penalties for violations of state laws dating back decades.

The companies are alleged to have known about the toxicity and persistence of PFAS since the 1950s but failed to protect the public, leading to widespread contamination.

Connecticut has already taken steps to ban the use of PFAS in firefighting foam and food packaging, but the state continues to deal with the aftermath of PFAS contamination.

The lawsuits highlight contamination in various water systems and call for accountability from the chemical manufacturers responsible for the pollution.

The legal actions represent Connecticut’s effort to address the serious health and environmental consequences associated with PFAS contamination and hold responsible parties accountable for their actions.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.

The U.S. District Judge overseeing all lawsuits related to injuries caused by aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting chemical, has granted the parties a 24-week period for core discovery in a selection of cases.

All AFFF lawsuits are consolidated before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in South Carolina for coordinated discovery, pretrial procedures, and early bellwether trials.

While many pending claims involve workplace exposure to AFFF, the judge is prioritizing water contamination cases for the initial trials.

Initial cases involve plaintiffs exposed to contaminated water near specific locations.

A recent case management order affirms that the court has accepted the lists of potential trial cases and outlines the core discovery process for the initial Personal Injury Bellwether Discovery Pool.

The discovery process involves exchanging relevant documents and information and conducting limited depositions over 24 weeks.

Following core discovery, the parties will narrow down the cases to a set of “Initial Personal Injury Bellwether Trial Pool Plaintiffs.”

These cases will undergo additional preparation for trial, including expert reports and dispositive motions practice.

Eight weeks before completing core discovery, the parties are expected to propose a process for selecting the initial personal injury bellwether trial pool plaintiffs, as well as the process leading to the first bellwether trial.

While the outcomes of these early trials will not have a binding impact on other claims, they may influence future firefighter cancer settlement negotiations and the resolution of the litigation.

Apart from individual firefighter claims, the manufacturers also face AFFF water provider lawsuits brought by cities, states, and municipalities seeking damages for removing toxic chemicals from local water supplies.

If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.