Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Update [April 2025 Guide]

A new study has found that polypropylene, the material commonly used in transvaginal mesh (TVM) implants, starts to degrade within 60 days of implantation in the pelvis.

This discovery adds to growing concerns over the safety of TVM implants, which have been used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence but are linked to severe side effects, including pelvic pain, infection, and difficulty urinating.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom, examined the degradation of polypropylene mesh in sheep, which share similar pelvic anatomy to humans.

The research revealed that the material becomes stiffer and shows signs of oxidation over time. Additionally, polypropylene particles were discovered in the tissue surrounding the implant site, with concentrations increasing over time.

Campaigners are calling for immediate action from medical authorities to prevent further harm from these implants. 

The findings highlight the need for safer materials and raise concerns that the mesh was not sufficiently tested for use in the pelvis before being widely implemented.

Sheila MacNeil, an emeritus professor of biomaterials and tissue engineering, emphasized the importance of developing new materials to prevent harm to patients.

These results come after more than 100 women in England, who suffered complications from vaginal mesh implants, received compensation in a group settlement.

Dr. Nicholas Farr, the study’s lead researcher, hopes the findings will prompt manufacturers to improve the safety of future implants.

Kath Sansom, founder of the support group Sling The Mesh, pointed to the study as further evidence of the dangers associated with polypropylene mesh.

She urged immediate changes in medical practice and called for alternative methods to be used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed across courts in the United States on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

The Hernia Mesh Lawsuit MDL has seen a huge update and a large step towards compensation for victims.

Bard has agreed to settle nearly all cases in the hernia mesh multidistrict litigation (MDL) and Rhode Island state court.

This settlement resolved over 30,000 claims, marking the end of a hard-fought legal battle.

The Bard Hernia Mesh MDL, which began in August 2018, faced delays due to COVID-19 and a series of trials in both MDL and RI state court.

After the MDL judge adjourned a scheduled bellwether trial in early 2024 and ordered mediation, a settlement seemed likely.

Now, after months of negotiations, an agreement has been reached to provide compensation for clients who suffered from defective Bard hernia mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld the lower court’s decision in the case of Virginia Redding vs. Coloplast Corporation.

This appeal addressed the statute of limitations for vaginal mesh product liability claims under Florida law.

Virginia Redding filed a lawsuit against Coloplast Corporation on September 18, 2014, alleging that the vaginal mesh devices implanted in her body were defectively designed, resulting in serious harm.

Coloplast argued that Redding’s lawsuit was time-barred under Florida’s four-year statute of limitations for product liability claims, as her symptoms began more than four years before she filed suit.

The court found no error in the district court’s decision, affirming that Redding did not know, and should not have known, of a distinct injury caused by the mesh before September 18, 2010.

The jury awarded Redding $2.5 million in damages, and the district court denied Coloplast’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law.

The case highlights the complexities surrounding product liability lawsuits, particularly regarding the statute of limitations.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

A Philadelphia jury awarded $20 million in damages to a woman from Cinnaminson, NJ, who suffered injuries related to a vaginal mesh product manufactured by Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

The lawsuit, filed in the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, concluded in late April.

The jury found that the surgical mesh device did not perform as advertised and caused the woman chronic pain and multiple revision surgeries.

The three-week trial focused on Ethicon’s TVT-Secur transvaginal mesh product used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

The woman underwent a procedure for stress urinary incontinence with the TVT-Secur mesh, which began eroding within two months.

Despite three surgeries to remove the mesh, fragments remain in her body, causing ongoing pain and urinary dysfunction.

She claimed that Johnson & Johnson failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks and did not supply sufficient instructions.

The jury awarded $2.5 million for economic and non-economic damages, including medical bills.

An additional $17.5 million was awarded in punitive damages, indicating the jury’s view of Ethicon’s conduct as egregiously negligent.

This $20 million verdict is one of several significant awards against Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson concerning mesh devices that pose increased risks of injuries and complications.

Despite recalls of the TVT-Secur and other mesh products, many patients who underwent procedures using these devices continue to suffer complications.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

The FDA has completed its evaluation of the final reports for the 522 SUI Mini-Slings studies, which show that SUI mini-slings are as effective as traditional mid-urethral slings over a 36-month period.

The studies also revealed similar types and rates of adverse events and re-surgery for both SUI mini-slings and traditional mid-urethral slings. .

The FDA also performed a systematic literature review of 30 randomized controlled clinical trials published between 2013 and 2023.

This review compared the safety and effectiveness of SUI mini-slings with traditional mid-urethral slings, supporting the conclusion that SUI mini-slings perform comparably to traditional mid-urethral slings.

Surgical mesh sling procedures are commonly used to correct stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

The FDA required manufacturers of surgical mesh used for SUI, specifically mini-slings, to conduct long-term follow-up studies to evaluate their safety and effectiveness.

The results from these studies, along with the systematic literature review, indicate that mini-slings are as effective and safe as traditional mid-urethral slings.

The FDA will continue monitoring and evaluating these devices to ensure their safety and effectiveness for treating stress urinary incontinence.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

The Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Despite the widely known risks and thousands of lawsuits against vaginal mesh manufacturers, women are still dealing with severe side effects from these procedures.

Vaginal mesh implants, often used to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, continue to cause significant complications for many women worldwide.

Many women report chronic pain, erosion of the mesh into surrounding tissues, and severe incontinence following vaginal mesh surgeries.

These complications often lead to multiple revision surgeries and a lifetime of discomfort and medical issues.

The difficulty in removing the mesh once implanted exacerbates these problems, leaving many women with incomplete relief even after additional procedures.

The widespread issues with vaginal mesh have led to numerous lawsuits and significant settlements.

Healthcare providers and manufacturers face increasing scrutiny over the use of these implants.

Many women have successfully pursued legal claims, highlighting the importance of informed consent and the exploration of less invasive treatment options before resorting to surgery.

Despite this, many patients still find themselves struggling with debilitating symptoms and a reduced quality of life.

The severe side effects of vaginal mesh implants have far-reaching impacts on the lives of affected women.

Chronic pain, incontinence, and the emotional toll of these conditions significantly reduce their ability to engage in daily activities and maintain an active lifestyle.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

New Scientific Findings Are Being Reported Surrounding Vaginal Mesh Implants. 

A recent study highlights the advantages of Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) meshes over traditional polypropylene meshes for vaginal mesh procedures.

Published in Diagnostics 2023, the study shows that PVDF meshes offer better biostability, less inflammation, and reduced scarring, which lowers the incidence of chronic pain.

In a three-year follow-up of women treated for anterior/apical vaginal prolapse with PVDF meshes, 85.2% achieved anatomic success, with minimal complications such as mesh protrusion or pain.

Despite these benefits, PVDF meshes are not widely used in the United States due to higher costs.

Dr. Greg Vigna, an expert in mid-urethral sling complications, criticizes the continued use of polypropylene meshes in the U.S., advocating for the safer PVDF option.

His law group investigates complications from mid-urethral slings and represents affected women nationwide.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

Women all over the world are being misinformed before surgery involving transvaginal mesh implants, and many are left with painful and life changing complications.

The Transvaginal Mesh Case Record Review found that many women were not accurately informed about the surgery or its risks.

The review examined over 40,000 pages of records from 18 women, revealing that poor communication and misleading information left many unprepared for chronic pain and nerve damage.

The lack of clear, accurate information from doctors led to mistrust and inadequate aftercare.

The review called for a comprehensive register to track mesh implant surgeries and removals.

It emphasized the need for better aftercare, clear communication, and accurate medical records to support affected women.

Misinformation about transvaginal mesh implants has caused significant harm. Legal actions and reviews aim to improve healthcare practices.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.

Our Vaginal Mesh Lawyers are actively accepting clients. 

Vaginal mesh implants, originally intended to treat incontinence and prolapse post-childbirth, have led to numerous adverse effects, causing a surge in vaginal mesh lawsuits.

Thousands of women received transvaginal mesh implants in Scotland before the procedure was halted in 2018.

These implants have caused life-altering side effects, including chronic pain, autoimmune issues, and severe fatigue.

Many women have had to undergo private treatments to alleviate their symptoms, further exacerbating their distress and financial burden.

The Complex Mesh Surgical Service (CMSS) was established to support women affected by transvaginal mesh.

However, feedback from many women highlighted significant shortcomings in the service, including unclear referral pathways and long wait times for appointments.

Women reported educating their GPs about mesh complications, reflecting a lack of knowledge among healthcare providers.

Numerous women have experienced severe injuries from mesh implants, forcing them to abandon their careers.

Despite undergoing surgeries locally, many have had to travel abroad for more comprehensive removal procedures.

Women suffering from complications due to transvaginal mesh implants are seeking justice through vaginal mesh lawsuits,

Improved healthcare practices and specialized treatments are essential to address these severe complications.

If you or someone you know is affected, contact a Vaginal Mesh lawsuit lawyer to explore your legal options and secure the compensation you deserve.

Our Vaginal Mesh Lawyers are actively accepting clients. 

A 57-year-old Canadian woman has filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson, alleging significant health issues caused by a surgical mesh product manufactured by Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

The lawsuit claims the mesh, implanted after a partial hysterectomy in 2008, led to severe complications including chronic pain and organ damage.

Over a decade following the surgery, the plaintiff experienced escalating pain that affected her ability to work and maintain social relationships.

Medical investigations revealed in 2021 that the mesh had fragmented and embedded in her organs, causing serious infections and necessitating multiple surgeries, including emergency procedures to prevent septic risk.

Johnson & Johnson has defended the safety and effectiveness of its pelvic mesh products, attributing their market withdrawal to commercial reasons rather than safety concerns.

This stance comes despite numerous global reports and legal actions that suggest a different narrative concerning the safety of these products.

Ethicon has previously withdrawn several mesh products from the market, including those used for pelvic organ problems and hernia repairs, following reports of higher than expected failure rates and subsequent surgeries.

These withdrawals have fueled ongoing legal challenges and public scrutiny.

The lawsuit in Winnipeg adds to the growing body of global litigation related to surgical mesh products.

In Scotland, for example, the government has taken steps to support women suffering from complications due to transvaginal mesh implants, including funding for mesh removal surgeries.

The Vaginal Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The vaginal mesh lawsuit focuses on severe complications arising from transvaginal mesh implants.

These medical devices, designed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, are now at the center of legal scrutiny due to their failure and resultant severe health consequences.

Plaintiffs allege that the mesh implants have led to painful complications such as mesh erosion, infection, organ perforation, and pain during intercourse.

These conditions often require additional corrective surgeries and can lead to chronic pain and disability.

Major manufacturers involved in this lawsuit include Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, along with C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, and others.

These companies are accused of failing to adequately test the devices and of not informing patients and physicians of known, potentially severe risks.

As of the latest updates, numerous cases have been settled, while others proceed through various stages of litigation.

Some manufacturers have ceased production of certain mesh products in response to the mounting evidence and legal actions.

Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.

If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit instantly.