Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

A Missouri appeals court on Tuesday rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s request that it take a second look at its decision that affirmed a jury’s finding that the company’s talcum powder products gave nearly two dozen woman ovarian cancer and upheld $2.11 billion in damages from the landmark $4.7 billion verdict.

In a pair of single-sentence orders, the Eastern District Court of Appeals succinctly denied both J&J’s motion for rehearing and its application for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court, both of which were filed earlier this month.

J&J spokesperson Kim Montagnino told Law360 that the denials of its motions were a “procedural next step” in the appeal, and that the company’s following move will indeed be asking the Missouri high court to hear the case.

“The verdict was the product of a fundamentally unfair process that allowed plaintiffs to present a group of 22 women, most of whom had no connection to Missouri, in a single case all alleging that they developed ovarian cancer,” she said. “We continue to believe this was a fundamentally flawed trial, grounded in faulty presentation of the facts, and will pursue further review of this case by the Supreme Court of Missouri.”

On June 23, the appellate court slashed nearly $2.6 billion from the record-setting verdict won in June 2018 by a group of plaintiffs who alleged asbestos and other carcinogens in J&J talc products gave 22 women ovarian cancer.

In its motion for a rehearing, J&J argued that the verdicts were based on flawed expert testimony that should not have gone to the jury. The company further argued that the appellate court’s jurisdictional ruling meant new trials should be ordered on the surviving plaintiff’s claims – and that the court had overlooked the significant differences in those claims, which warrant having them split into separate trials.

“Considering the number of differences among plaintiffs, the sheer volume of the jury instructions and the number of different state laws involved, the relatively short time spent in deliberations, and the identical awards that followed those deliberations, it is inconceivable that the jury considered each claim separately based only on the evidence presented on each plaintiff,” J&J argued.

Share

Litigation Updates

EPA to broaden risk review of Asbestos

October 15, 2021

October 15, 2021

EPA to broaden risk review of Asbestos

Johnson & Johnson Fail to Rid of $2 Billion Verdict in Talc Products Lawsuit

November 4, 2020

November 4, 2020

Johnson & Johnson Fail to Rid of $2 Billion Verdict in Talc Products Lawsuit

New Jersey State Appeals Court Revives Two Lawsuits Alleging J&J Talc Caused Cancer

August 5, 2020

August 5, 2020

New Jersey State Appeals Court Revives Two Lawsuits Alleging J&J Talc Caused Cancer

Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

July 29, 2020

July 29, 2020

Missouri Appeals Court Denies J&J’s request for a second look into $2 Billion Decision

Talcum Powder Cases Chosen in Talc-Ovarian Cancer Multidistrict Litigation

July 8, 2020

July 8, 2020

Talcum Powder Cases Chosen in Talc-Ovarian Cancer Multidistrict Litigation

Judge Upholds J&J $186 Million Punitive Award in Talc Asbestos Lawsuit

June 29, 2020

June 29, 2020

Judge Upholds J&J $186 Million Punitive Award in Talc Asbestos Lawsuit

CLIENT REVIEWS

quotation
Tom Lewis

TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.

quotation
Jordan Terry

TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.

quotation
Dave Woodley

All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.

quotation
Jordan Butler

I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!

quotation
Maddy Moeller

Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!

quotation
Karen Hersman

A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!

quotation
Angel Truesdale

They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!

quotation
Paul Graegin

The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR MESSAGE

One of our associates will follow up with you shortly