Active LitigationMDL 3026
Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
Active Litigation·MDL 3026
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
On this page, we discuss the ongoing Similac and Enfamil litigation involving necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), the allegations against these baby formula manufacturers, products named in the lawsuits, and who may qualify for an Enfamil NEC claim with TorHoerman Law.
NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits have been filed against major baby formula manufacturers, including Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, alleging that their cow’s milk-based formulas increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
NEC is a serious gastrointestinal condition that primarily affects preterm babies, leading to inflammation, infection, and in some cases, death.
Similac and Enfamil Lawsuits claim that manufacturers failed to adequately warn healthcare providers and parents about the heightened risks associated with these products.
Federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) has consolidated many of these cases in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Additionally, several high-profile state trials have already resulted in significant verdicts for plaintiffs, including a $495 million verdict secured by TorHoerman Law.
Families impacted by NEC are seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and long-term care costs.

If your child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after receiving an Enfamil formula or fortifier in the NICU of a hospital, you may be eligible to file an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation about a potential Enfamil NEC claim.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to find out whether you may qualify for an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits filed against these major baby formula manufacturers seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and the lifelong care many affected infants will need.
These cases aim to hold manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their products, which has devastated countless families.
For families caring for children who have developed NEC, the emotional and financial burden can be overwhelming.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting NEC claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
Families with potential Enfamil NEC claims can contact our law firm for a free consultation.
The NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit involves legal claims brought against major baby formula manufacturers, such as Abbott Laboratories (the maker of Similac) and Mead Johnson (the maker of Enfamil).
NEC Lawsuits claim that cow’s milk based formulas increase the risk of NEC in premature infants and low birth weight infants.
Plaintiffs argue that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn healthcare providers and parents about the risks associated with these products.
In many cases, families of infants who developed NEC after being fed these formulas are seeking compensation for medical expenses, long-term care, pain and suffering, and wrongful death.
Similac and Enfamil Baby Formula Lawsuits are being pursued both in state courts and as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court.
These cases are important not only for compensating affected families but also for bringing attention to potential risks in neonatal care.

If your family has been impacted by necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after using cow’s milk-based formulas, we understand the pain, worry, and financial strain you’re going through.
No family should have to endure the devastating effects of NEC without being informed of the risks involved.
At TorHoerman Law, we are dedicated to holding formula manufacturers accountable and ensuring affected families receive the justice and compensation they deserve.
Let us help you navigate this difficult time.
Contact us today for a free consultation and to learn more about your legal options.
The baby formula brands named in the NEC lawsuits include Similac, produced by Abbott Laboratories, and Enfamil, made by Mead Johnson.
These cow’s milk based baby formulas are specifically administered in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and maternity wards to premature and low birth weight infants, rather than being sold in retail stores.
Families affected by these products allege that cow’s milk-based formulas significantly increase the risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
The specific type of baby formula given to your child will be visible on medical and feeding records created by the hospital.

Similac baby formula products mentioned in the NEC Lawsuits include:
Enfamil formulas mentioned in the NEC Lawsuits include:
If your child was diagnosed with NEC after receiving an Enfamil formula or fortifier, you may be eligible to pursue an Enfamil NEC claim.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation or use the chat feature on this page to find out whether you may qualify for an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law has been a leader in this litigation, recently securing a $495 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories.
This landmark case involved a premature infant who developed NEC after being fed Abbott’s Similac formula.
The jury awarded $95 million in compensatory damages and an additional $400 million in punitive damages, sending a strong message about corporate responsibility.
TorHoerman Law’s successful outcome highlights the firm’s commitment to holding baby formula manufacturers accountable for their negligence.

The case is a significant step forward in the fight for justice for families affected by toxic baby formula.
As the litigation continues, this victory is expected to influence settlement discussions in other NEC Lawsuits and the NEC Baby Formula MDL.
Families whose children developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil formula or fortifier can contact TorHoerman Law to discuss a potential claim.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening gastrointestinal disorder that primarily affects premature infants.
It causes inflammation and tissue death in the intestines, leading to severe abdominal pain, bloating, and blood in the stool.
In extreme cases, NEC can result in a perforated intestine, which may lead to a dangerous infection or sepsis.
Infants who develop NEC often require surgery to remove dead sections of the intestine, and some may experience lifelong complications such as short bowel syndrome.
The exact cause of NEC is unknown, but formula feeding, particularly with cow’s milk-based formulas, has been linked to an increased risk of NEC in preterm babies.
Studies have shown that preterm infants who are exclusively breastfed have a lower risk of developing NEC compared to those fed with cow milk-based formula.
Breast milk contains protective antibodies and nutrients that support an underdeveloped digestive system, whereas formula lacks these benefits.
Medical professionals are advised to closely monitor feeding practices for at-risk infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Premature infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) face a challenging road ahead, often requiring extensive medical care and long-term support.

Several scientific studies have established links between cow milk formulas and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
One study published in The Lancet found that premature infants fed cow’s milk-based formulas were significantly more likely to develop NEC compared to those who were exclusively fed human breast milk.
Another study from The Journal of Pediatrics highlighted that the risk of NEC can be up to ten times higher in premature infants receiving cow’s milk-based formula as opposed to breast milk.
The biological reasoning behind this link suggests that the immature digestive systems of preterm infants struggle to process cow’s milk proteins, which leads to intestinal inflammation and bacterial overgrowth.
Research from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition points out that formulas fortified with cow’s milk components lack the protective antibodies present in breast milk, which play a crucial role in preventing NEC.
These findings have prompted medical professionals to recommend using human milk, including donor milk, for preterm infants when possible.

Formula manufacturers have come under increasing scrutiny for failing to adequately warn parents and healthcare providers about these risks.
As more families file NEC Lawsuits, the debate continues over the safety of cow’s milk-based formulas for vulnerable premature infants.
This growing body of evidence supports the argument that cow’s milk formulas pose significant risks to preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Premature babies fed Similac or Enfamil products have an increased to develop the symptoms of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and subsequent complications.
These symptoms can include low birth weight, feeding problems, and bloating.
Left untreated, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) leads to bloody stools and bile-filled vomit.
Treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) can be extremely expensive.
Surgically treating NEC can cost as much as $300,000 in medical bills.
NEC is extremely dangerous and painful for infants, emotionally traumatizing for parents, and the resulting medical bills can be extremely burdensome on top of it all.
The costs associated with treating necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) can be overwhelming for families.
Premature babies who develop NEC as a result of being fed Similac or Enfamil products often face a long road of medical treatments and surgeries, driving up medical expenses.
In addition to the immediate medical costs, such as hospital stays, surgeries, and medications, there are often long-term care needs that can increase the financial burden significantly.
NEC can lead to complications such as short bowel syndrome and developmental delays, which may require lifelong care and nutritional support.
Families may also face the emotional toll of watching their infant endure painful procedures and uncertain outcomes.
The trauma of having a newborn in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with such a severe condition adds layers of stress, fear, and financial strain, as many parents must take time off work or make difficult decisions regarding care.

On top of the medical costs, families often need to deal with:
These costs underscore the importance of NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits in seeking compensation for families affected by this devastating condition.
Facing a diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) can be devastating for families, as it brings immense emotional and financial strain.
Watching your child endure such a painful and life-threatening condition is overwhelming, and the uncertainty surrounding the future adds to the burden.

If your child received an Enfamil cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), you may be eligible to file an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out whether you may qualify for an Enfamil NEC claim.
Evidence is the foundation of a successful Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
Establishing a clear connection between your child’s necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) diagnosis and the use of cow’s milk-based baby formula requires thorough and well-documented evidence.
Relevant evidence may include medical records, NICU feeding records, product-identification information, diagnostic testing, surgical records, and documentation of long-term complications.
These records may help document the formula administered, the timing of exposure and NEC diagnosis, and the injuries and treatment that followed.

Types of evidence that may be included in your claim may include:
Evidence will be crucial as you file your NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit.
It will prove the existence of negligence, causation, and damages — the essential elements of any personal injury claim, product liability claim, or wrongful death lawsuit.
Damages refer to the total compensation awarded to a plaintiff for the harm or losses they have suffered due to the negligence or wrongful actions of another party.
In the case of NEC Lawsuits, families of affected infants seek to recover both economic and non-economic damages for the extensive financial, emotional, and physical toll of their child’s diagnosis.
These damages can cover a range of losses, from immediate medical expenses to long-term care costs and emotional suffering.
Because the effects of NEC can be severe and lifelong, assessing damages in these cases often involves projecting the future medical needs of the child, as well as the long-term impact on the family’s quality of life.
An experienced attorney can help calculate the full extent of these damages, ensuring that families receive the maximum compensation possible.

Types of damages in NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits may include:
These damages are intended to provide financial relief and hold negligent formula manufacturers accountable for the harm they have caused.
When filing an NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit, it’s crucial to have an attorney with a deep understanding of product liability and medical injury cases, especially those related to toxic baby formulas.
TorHoerman Law has represented families in NEC litigation involving both Similac and Enfamil products and obtained a $495 million verdict in a 2024 case against Abbott Laboratories.
Our team of dedicated lawyers recently secured a $495 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories, highlighting our commitment to holding negligent manufacturers accountable.
Our law firm is currently accepting new NEC claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson. TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
With years of experience in handling complex product liability cases, our firm understands the challenges faced by families dealing with the emotional, physical, and financial toll of NEC.
At TorHoerman Law, we provide compassionate, personalized legal guidance, ensuring that each client’s unique situation is carefully assessed and represented.
We prioritize fighting for the maximum compensation possible, aiming to cover medical expenses, long-term care costs, pain and suffering, and other damages families may face.
Contact our experienced NEC lawyers today for a free consultation.
You can also use our chat feature to quickly determine if you qualify to file an NEC lawsuit, and we’ll guide you through the next steps.
It can be extremely traumatizing for parents to see their preterm infants suffering from NEC, and treatment can be costly.
The effects of this often-fatal gastrointestinal disease are often felt for years after the initial diagnosis.
If you’re one of the many parents of premature infants suffering from NEC, know that you are not alone.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting NEC claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out whether you may qualify for an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
To file a claim in the NEC lawsuit, you should speak with a qualified attorney who can help determine your eligibility and guide you through the claims process.
If you believe you may qualify for the Toxic Baby Formula Lawsuit, you can use the chatbot on this page for an instant and free case review to see if you qualify to file a Baby Formula Lawsuit.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious gastrointestinal condition that primarily affects premature infants.
NEC occurs when the intestinal tissue becomes inflamed and begins to die, potentially leading to perforations in the intestinal wall and bacterial infection.
NEC is life-threatening and requires immediate medical intervention, often including surgery to remove the affected part of the intestines.
The exact cause is unknown, but feeding premature infants cow’s milk-based products has been associated with a higher risk of developing NEC compared to babies fed human milk exclusively.
Infants diagnosed with NEC often face long-term health challenges, including digestive issues, developmental delays, and a higher risk of mortality.
You may qualify for an Enfamil NEC lawsuit if your child was born prematurely, received an Enfamil cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier in a hospital or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and was subsequently diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Medical and feeding records may document the specific Enfamil product administered, the timing of formula exposure and NEC diagnosis, and the treatment or complications that followed.
Filing deadlines vary by state, and the applicable statute of limitations may affect whether a claim can be pursued.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac. We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation about a potential Enfamil NEC claim.
In an NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit, families can pursue compensation for both economic and non-economic damages.
Economic damages typically cover medical expenses, including hospital stays, surgeries, medications, and long-term care for NEC-related complications.
Non-economic damages may include pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of quality of life for both the baby and the family.
In some cases, families may also be able to seek compensation for future medical expenses or lost income due to caregiving needs.
The exact compensation depends on the severity of the child’s condition and the legal case filed against the formula manufacturers.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.