If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
You may be eligible to file a Tylenol Autism ADHD Lawsuit / Acetaminophen Autism ADHD Claim if you or a loved one used Tylenol and/ or Acetaminophen during pregnancy, and your child was subsequently diagnosed with ADHD or Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
Nearly 200,000 Exactech hip, knee and ankle implants have been recalled due to packaging errors that can lead to the breakdown of parts vital to the device’s function.
Injuries related to recalled Exactech joint replacement devices may require patients to undergo revision surgery.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from an Exactech implant device, you may be entitled to financial compensation by filing an Exactech Implant Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Camp Lejeune, a military base in North Carolina, experienced water contamination between 1953 and 1987, exposing over one million residents to harmful chemicals.
The water contamination has been linked to various health issues, including cancers, birth defects, and other diseases — leading to the filing of the Camp Lejeune Lawsuit.
You may qualify for the Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Lawsuit if you lived or worked at Camp Lejeune for 30+ days between August 1, 1953 and December 31, 1987 and have since suffered health effects from the decades of water contamination that occurred.
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) are man-made chemicals that were widely used in various industries until they were banned in 1979 due to their toxic nature and potential health risks.
Exposure to PCBs can lead to serious health issues, including cancer, reproductive problems, and immune system disorders.
PCB Exposure Lawsuits claim that manufacturers knew about the dangers but failed to warn the public, leading to numerous PCB exposure settlements and verdicts in favor of the victims.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Chemical Manufacturers face legal action over Firefighting Foam Cancer Risk
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
The law firm TorHoerman Law is actively investigating AFFF cases and offering free consultations for individuals who believe they have been harmed by the foam.
There were 320 new cases added to the AFFF MDL in the past month.
Our AFFF Lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
Toxic chemicals in Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF Firefighting Foam) have been linked to numerous types of cancer, including prostate cancer, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, and more.
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) chemicals, also known as forever chemicals, used to make AFFF firefighting foam do not break down, remaining in the environment and in human blood indefinitely.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
If you’re considering filing an AFFF Lawsuit or AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit, you likely have some questions.
Below, our attorneys look at the studies conducted on the AFFF Firefighting Foam, and evidence linking these chemicals to various forms of cancer.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit concerns the harmful effects of direct exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), found in military-grade firefighting foam.
These “forever chemicals” are linked to several serious health conditions due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.
As of September 1st, the number of cases filed in the AFFF MDL stood at 9,576.
By October, that number increased to 9,896 AFFF Lawsuits pending, representing an increase of 320 new filings.
This rise reflects growing awareness of the dangers posed by PFAS exposure from AFFF, especially as more studies emerge linking the chemicals to various cancers and other debilitating illnesses.
The Department of Veterans Affairs is conducting an in-depth investigation to determine if kidney cancer can be linked to exposure to PFAS chemicals, which are found in firefighting foam and other products.
The outcome could designate kidney cancer as a presumptive service-connected condition, accelerating veterans’ access to health care and benefits.
This study follows growing concerns about the connection between PFAS exposure and various forms of cancer.
Veterans who were exposed to these chemicals during military service may be eligible for expedited claims if a connection is established.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.A group of firefighters have filed a lawsuit against several major chemical companies, including 3M.
The lawsuit alleges severe health impacts from long-term exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF and is outside the current filings in the AFFF MDL, which is consolidated in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.
The 12 plaintiffs in this lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of Louisiana, claim exposure to AFFF has led to serious health issues, such as prostate cancer, leukemia, and kidney cancer.
Despite decades of research showing the harmful effects of PFAS, the companies allegedly failed to provide adequate warnings or implement safety measures, continuing to distribute the foam without consent.
The plaintiffs are seeking medical monitoring, injunctive relief, and accountability for the damage caused by AFFF.
Meanwhile, in Brunswick, Maine, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) continues its comprehensive testing following a significant AFFF spill that occurred in August 2024.
Ongoing soil and water sampling have shown PFAS contamination in local watersheds and marine environments, with some soil results showing elevated levels of PFAS.
Although water supplies have not been directly impacted, and public drinking water remains safe, the DEP has advised the public to avoid recreational activities in the affected areas.
Testing will continue, and further updates are expected as the cleanup progresses.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The ongoing AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) firefighting lawsuits have become a significant legal and environmental issue due to the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals.”
These chemicals, found in products like firefighting foam, have been linked to serious health risks, including cancer, and have contaminated water supplies in various locations.
Minnesota’s Regulatory Actions: For the first time, the state of Minnesota is requiring 3M to limit the amount of PFAS discharged into the Mississippi River from its Cottage Grove plant, following long-standing concerns about contamination of fish and water in the area.
The plant, which previously manufactured Scotchgard and now produces specialty tapes and chemicals, has a history of PFAS-related pollution issues, leading to drinking water contamination in the region.
Despite 3M’s plans to end PFAS production by 2025 and build a $300 million water treatment system, the company is challenging the new permit requirements, claiming they are legally unjustified.
Contamination in Grand Prairie, Texas: A firefighting foam spill in Grand Prairie led to potential water contamination affecting about 60,000 residents.
Although the foam used was said not to contain PFAS, residents were still advised to avoid using tap water due to the backflow issue, forcing businesses and schools to close temporarily.
The incident highlights the broader problem of firefighting foam contaminating water supplies and the need for better regulations to prevent such occurrences.
Cape Fear River Study: A new study from Cape Fear River Watch revealed that fish tissue samples from the Northeast Cape Fear River, near Kenansville, North Carolina, contain PFOS levels 20 times higher than state standards.
THe PFOS, part of the PFAS “forever chemicals,” have been linked to severe health risks, including cancer and developmental defects.
Lear’s Textile Company, located nearby, has acknowledged using PFAS in their manufacturing process and is working with state regulators to phase out the chemicals.
Locals are now avoiding recreational activities in the river due to contamination concerns
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit involves claims against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used by firefighters.
More than 1,400 gallons of firefighting foam containing toxic PFAS, also known as forever chemicals, accidentally spilled at an airplane hanger in Maine.
The spill occurred when an outdated fire suppression system at Hangar 4, located at the Brunswick Executive Airport, discharged unexpectedly, filling the hangar and nearby areas with foam.
This foam contains toxic chemicals known as PFAS, which have been linked to serious health issues.
The AFFF Lawsuit seeks compensation for those affected by exposure to these harmful substances.
In August, the number of filings within the federal AFFF MDL was 9,525.
By September 1st, the number of filings has increased to 9,576.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing
Over 1,600 gallons of firefighting foam containing harmful PFAS chemicals were accidentally discharged at the former Brunswick Naval Air Base, now operating as Brunswick Executive Airport, due to a fire suppression system malfunction.
The foam, designed to extinguish jet fuel fires, entered the sewer and stormwater systems, leading to significant environmental contamination.
Nearby nature preserves were impacted, with foam reaching depths of four to eight feet in some ponds, according to Steve Walker from the Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust.
Cleanup efforts by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection are ongoing, but concerns remain about the long-term environmental impact, as these chemicals are known for their persistence in nature and links to serious health risks.
PFAS chemicals in AFFF are at the center of ongoing lawsuits, where plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the health and environmental damages caused by these toxic substances.
The Brunswick spill could potentially contribute to the growing litigation surrounding PFAS contamination and its harmful effects on the environment and the people within the environment.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey recently signed a law that mandates the phase-out of PFAS chemicals in firefighters’ protective gear, a significant development in the ongoing litigation involving Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) and the toxic effects of PFAS.
The law, effective from January 2025, requires manufacturers and sellers to disclose the presence of PFAS in firefighting equipment and provide justifications for its inclusion.
By 2027, the sale of protective gear containing intentionally-added PFAS will be prohibited.
PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been linked to serious health conditions, including various cancers.
Firefighters, who are at a higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population, have been particularly affected due to prolonged exposure to these chemicals in their gear and the use of AFFF in firefighting operations.
The impact of this legislation is likely to influence the ongoing AFFF lawsuits, which allege that PFAS exposure from firefighting foam and gear has caused significant health problems.
With Massachusetts enacting one of the nation’s strongest PFAS regulations, this law could set a precedent for similar actions in other states, potentially affecting the outcomes of AFFF-related litigations.
Firefighter unions and advocacy groups, such as the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), have long campaigned against the use of PFAS in firefighting equipment, citing the chemical’s role in causing occupational cancers.
The new law is a response to these concerns and reflects a growing recognition of the dangers.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
States across the nation are increasing efforts to address the dangers of PFAS chemicals in firefighting gear and foams.
PFAS are synthetic chemicals resistant to breaking down in the environment and are linked to significant health risks, including liver and kidney damage, reproductive harm, and certain cancers.
The Massachusetts State Senate has passed a bill banning PFAS in firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE), set to take effect on January 1, 2027.
This legislation aims to eliminate PFAS from the protective gear worn by firefighters, addressing the growing concern over the health risks associated with prolonged exposure to these chemicals.
Firefighter unions are advocating for the state’s House of Representatives to expedite the bill’s passage and present it to Governor Healey before the close of the legislative session.
In Alaska, a new law has been enacted requiring fire departments to cease using PFAS-containing firefighting foams by January 1, 2025.
This law, which took effect without the governor’s signature, mandates a transition to PFAS-free alternatives and establishes a system for rural villages to dispose of existing PFAS foams, with financial reimbursement provided by the state.
This legislation reflects years of advocacy by environmental and health organizations and represents a significant step in addressing PFAS contamination, particularly in areas surrounding airports and military bases where these foams have been extensively used.
Two more fire departments in Connecticut, Stamford and Old Mystic, have joined a federal lawsuit against 3M and DuPont.
The lawsuit alleges that the companies’ turnout gear, used by firefighters, contains PFAS chemicals that pose cancer risks.
This legal action, which includes several other Connecticut departments and firefighter unions, may be the first of its kind in the nation, highlighting the increasing legal challenges faced by manufacturers of PFAS-containing products.
In relation to the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL, the litigation saw an increase of more than 300 cases in the past month.
9,525 pending AFFF Lawsuits were reported by the JPML on August 1.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved a transportation spending bill allocating $70 million to help airports transition to PFAS-free firefighting foams.
This funding is significantly higher than the House’s proposed $5 million.
Congress must reconcile the differences between the two versions of the T-HUD Fiscal Year 2025 Appropriations Bill.
PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and human body and are linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and immune system damage.
Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting contains PFAS and can contaminate water supplies near airports.
Earlier this year, the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization law established a five-year, $350 million grant program to aid airports in transitioning away from PFAS-containing foams.
The Senate T-HUD bill fully funds the program’s first year at $70 million and allocates $4.52 billion for airport infrastructure and safety improvements, and emissions reductions.
PFAS-free firefighting foams have been available since 2019, with over 100 fluorine-free options from 24 manufacturers meeting international aviation standards.
These alternatives are safe, effective, and ready for adoption by the military and U.S. airports.
Decades of using PFAS-laden foams have contaminated drinking and groundwater near airports.
The transition to PFAS-free foams is crucial for mitigating further environmental and health risks.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The federal Judge overseeing the Firefighting Foam MDL has selected nine cases involving Pennsylvania residents with kidney or testicular cancer and Colorado residents with thyroid cancer or ulcerative colitis to go to trial.
Other key developments in the AFFF Lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing as the government is taking steps to eliminate the use of firefighting foam.
A mechanical malfunction at the Alaska Army National Guard Aviation Facility in Bethel caused a release of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS chemicals on June 25, 2024.
Approximately ten gallons of AFFF were released due to a fire suppression system malfunction, impacting the facility’s boiler room, hangar bay floor, and a small area outside.
The Alaska National Guard environmental team is hiring a PFAS-trained contractor for sample testing and ongoing site monitoring.
Additionally, The Seneca Army Depot, now a Superfund site, has known PFAS contamination in its groundwater due to the historical use of AFFF.
Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) request for PFAS testing in these creeks, the Army has not planned immediate testing, opting to sample off-base receptors only if PFAS migration is observed.
The EPA, after consultations with the Army, removed the testing request from its website, continuing discussions on PFAS remediation with the Army Corps of Engineers.
Seneca County has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging PFAS contamination from the depot has damaged its drinking water supply.
The lawsuit asserts that AFFF used at the depot for decades has contaminated the water supply with PFAS compounds.
The Waterloo water plant’s 2023 report shows PFOA levels at 4.24 ppt, disputing higher contamination levels cited in the lawsuit.
The plant is upgrading its filtering systems to address PFAS contamination, with costs expected to exceed $12 million.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and later developed complications, you could be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering.
Contact TorHoerman Law AFFF Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing as the government is taking steps to eliminate the use of the firefighting foam.
The Department of Defense (DOD) is actively working to eliminate the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) at its installations due to the significant health risks posed by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in AFFF.
PFAS exposure has been linked to adverse health effects, including impacts on fetal development, the immune system, the thyroid, liver damage, and cancer.
Under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the DOD must discontinue the use of AFFF by October 1, 2024, with possible waivers extending to October 1, 2026, except for shipboard use.
The DOD has developed plans and schedules for replacing AFFF in all land-based mobile assets and facilities worldwide.
This includes creating specifications for a fluorine-free foam alternative to meet fire extinguishing performance standards.
However, the transition faces several challenges, including compatibility issues with existing firefighting systems, substantial funding requirements estimated at over $2.1 billion, and the need for extensive training for DOD firefighters in the use of fluorine-free foams.
Despite these obstacles, the DOD remains committed to phasing out AFFF and transitioning to safer alternatives.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and later developed complications, you could be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering.
Contact TorHoerman Law AFFF Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.
The AFFF lawsuit addresses claims related to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting, containing harmful chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These chemicals are linked to severe health issues, including cancer.
In June, there were 8,270 AFFF lawsuit filings.
By July, this number increased to 9,198.
PFAS in AFFF persists in the environment and human body, causing long-term health problems such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system issues.
Firefighters and exposed communities are at significant risk, leading to more individuals joining the AFFF lawsuit.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The Firefighting Foam lawsuit is ongoing.
Connecticut firefighters, represented by the Uniformed Professional Fire Fighters Association of Connecticut, filed a class action lawsuit against DuPont, 3M, Honeywell, and 16 other defendants.
The lawsuit claims that the protective gear used by firefighters was contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” which are linked to cancer.
The lawsuit, filed in the New Haven federal court, targets firefighter gear containing PFAS.
Plaintiffs, including five other unions and five individual firefighters, allege that PFAS in jackets, pants, and other turnout gear were absorbed through the skin, ingestion, and inhalation.
This absorption rate increases with rising temperatures and sweat buildup, leading to an increased risk of adverse health conditions.
The lawsuit demands at least $5 million in damages for violations of Connecticut product liability law.
DuPont and 3M produced the PFAS used in the gear, while a Honeywell subsidiary sold the gear without warning firefighters of the risks.
DuPont stated the lawsuit is without merit, while 3M indicated its intention to defend itself or settle as appropriate.
Honeywell did not respond to requests for comment.
PFAS, used in many products, are dubbed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the human body or the environment and have been linked to various health issues.
Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, who are commonly active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers.
If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
A federal judge in South Carolina has provisionally approved a $750 million settlement agreement involving Tyco Fire Products LP, a subsidiary of Johnson Controls International PLC, to address claims from public water systems concerning PFAS contamination.
The lawsuit alleged that PFAS contamination in certain water systems originated from Tyco’s aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) products used in firefighting.
This agreement is part of a larger multidistrict litigation (MDL) that has previously seen major settlements, including a $12.5 billion settlement with 3M Co. and a $1.2 billion settlement involving DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva.
The class affected by this settlement includes public water systems that have detected PFAS in their water sources as of mid-May.
The MDL has more than 10,000 cases concerning damages due to PFAS.
However, the settlement does not conclude all issues within the broader AFFF litigation, leaving several categories of claims unresolved.
The claims fall into five categories:
Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, who are commonly active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers.
If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.
The AFFF Lawsuit addresses the harmful impacts of PFAS chemicals found in firefighting foams, which were widely used by the US Military and airports for decades.
209 new cases were added to the AFFF MDL in the past month, totaling 8,270 cases pending as of June 1st.
PFAS chemicals in AFFF are associated with serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system disruption.
Commonly known as “forever chemicals”, these toxic substances persist in the human body and environment.
PFAS contamination of local water sources stemming from the use of AFFF is a significant issue nationwide, particularly near US Military bases.
Recent advancements, such as Battelle’s “The Annihilator,” which uses supercritical water oxidation technology, have shown promise in destroying PFAS compounds in contaminated wastewater and firefighting foams.
Advances in remediation technology are critical in removing PFAS from the environment.
Our AFFF Lawyers are accepting new clients who suffered from exposure to toxic firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other related health problems, contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and governmental remediation efforts.
The AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) Lawsuit highlights significant environmental and health risks associated with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), focusing on direct exposure to AFFF as well as contamination of U.S. water supplies.
PFAS are recognized for their indestructible nature in the environment, often referred to as “forever chemicals.”
The AFFF Lawsuit claims that 3M and other manufacturers failed to disclose the dangers associated with PFAS, which studies have linked to cancer and other serious health issues.
The Department of Defense began utilizing PFAS-containing foams in the 1970s, primarily for extinguishing oil and gas fires at military sites and airports.
However, as reported by ABC News, it wasn’t until decades later that the extent of PFAS water pollution was acknowledged, leading to its widespread detection in public water systems.
PFAS have been detected in 5,000 communities, in all 50 states, and have put 60 million Americans at risk.
Legal actions now aim to force PFAS manufacturers to fund comprehensive clean-up operations.
These include the installation of advanced water filtration systems designed to remove PFAS from affected water supplies – a costly but necessary measure to mitigate public health risks.
Advancements in firefighting technology have led to the development of PFAS-free foams.
There are now multiple foams that claim to be fluorine free, further testing has proved that these new foams can effectively extinguish liquid fuel fires.
Though PFAS free, the new foams have some drawbacks, they are dependent on “foam quality” meaning more foam must be discharged in ideal conditions to achieve the same results.
Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, typically active and retired military service members, firefighters, and airport workers
If you or a loved one have been exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other health problems, contact us today.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, with an increase in cases filed related to the firefighting foam litigation.
More than 300 new AFFF Lawsuits have been added to the MDL, with a total of 8,061 cases now pending in the litigation according to the latest filings from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).
AFFF has been widely used in firefighting training and responses, particularly at military and civilian airports.
Plaintiffs in the AFFF Lawsuit claim that exposure to PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) through AFFF has led to serious health issues, including cancer.
The AFFF Lawsuit targets manufacturers who, plaintiffs claim, knew about the dangers of exposure to AFFF but failed to warn users, putting their health at risk.
Firefighters, military personnel, and airport workers are among the most affected.
If you or a loved one have developed cancer or other health problems after being exposed to AFFF, contact us today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Tyco Fire Products has agreed to a $750 million settlement in AFFF litigation involving the contamination of public water systems affected by PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).
PFAS chemicals are known for their persistence in the environment and potentially severe health implications, including cancer and other illnesses.
This settlement follows other settlements with companies like 3M and Dupont, proving the continued legal push to manage the environmental and health risks associated with these chemicals.
The agreement, still pending court approval in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, aims to provide the necessary compensation to enhance water treatment infrastructure.
While this settlement involves public water systems impacted by PFAS-containing firefighting foam, the AFFF Lawsuit for personal injuries and cancer is ongoing and has not yet been settled.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF litigation continues to develop.
As of April 1st, there are now 7,738 AFFF lawsuits pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.
This marks a significant increase from the 7,170 AFFF lawsuits reported as of March 1st.
The rise in the number of cases can largely be ascribed to heightened awareness and individuals learning of their options to seek compensation for exposure to firefighting foam.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been commonly used in several branches of the military and by firefighters due to its effectiveness in combating fuel-based fires.
However, concerns have risen over the health impacts of substances contained in AFFF.
The heart of these lawsuits lies in the claims that exposure to the chemicals in AFFF, particularly PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), may be linked to a number of serious health conditions.
Those who have had prolonged contact with AFFF, including many firefighters and military personnel, are particularly at risk and have been at the forefront of raising these concerns.
If you or someone you know has been in contact with AFFF and have experienced related health problems, it’s recommended that you contact an attorney to assess your options.
Do not hesitate to contact our law firm for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to connect with our AFFF Lawyers.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
The AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) litigation is moving forward through the establishment of a procedural framework aimed at analyzing the scientific basis of claims that the foam’s chemicals cause liver and thyroid cancer.
A crucial component of this process is the upcoming “Science Day,” where experts will brief the MDL judge on relevant scientific and medical evidence, which are at the center of these cases.
This litigation phase includes selecting specific liver and thyroid cancer cases for the bellwether process, which simulates trial conditions to predict jury response to evidence and testimonies.
Critical deadlines have been set for the parties to exchange scientific studies supporting or contesting the cancer claims, culminating in the Science Day presentations.
Following this, a 60-day window is allocated for establishing a detailed plan for proceeding with these bellwether trials.
This all comes after the 3M Company settled water contamination claims with local water suppliers for over $10.3 billion.
Cancer claims due to AFFF exposure remain pending and have not been settled yet.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.
Currently, a total of 7,170 AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) Lawsuits are pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.
Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) are legal procedures in the United States designed to handle multiple related civil lawsuits that involve similar issues, facts or defendants.
When numerous individuals or entities file lawsuits related to a common set of circumstances, such as product liability, pharmaceuticals, or mass tort cases, these cases can be consolidated into a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings.
The AFFF MDLs aims to streamline the litigation process by centralizing the discovery process, reducing duplication of efforts, and ensuring consistent rulings on key legal issues.
The increase of 176 cases in the previous month illustrates the continued momentum of the AFFF MDL case.
A previous settlement deal was reached that addressed water contamination cases, but the litigation surrounding individual exposure to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) is ongoing.
If you or someone you know has suffered injuries due to AFFF, it’s important to explore your legal options
TorHoerman Law is here to offer guidance and support.
Use the chatbot feature on this page to automatically determine your eligibility for the AFFF Lawsuit.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
DuPont, 3M, and other major manufacturers of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have agreed to a settlement worth over $1 billion in litigation involving local governments and utilities across the country whose water was contaminated by forever chemicals.
PFAS are known as forever chemicals as they do not break down in the environment.
When these chemicals are used, the runoff can move through soils and contaminate drinking water sources.
These cancer-causing chemicals are contained in Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF).
AFFFs have been used to combat liquid-fueled fires and are commonly used on military bases, airports, chemical plants, and fire stations.
PFAS do not break down in the environment or in the human body.
When exposed to these chemicals, humans have an increased chance of developing cancer as well as other health risks.
The plaintiffs in the AFFF Litigation are not only water providers and property owners, but also individuals with personal injury claims against the companies.
The settlement mentioned above will serve as a collective fund for public water systems that have been contaminated by PFAS.
Individual lawsuits for AFFF exposure are ongoing and have not yet been resolved, but AFFF Lawyers are optimistic that the lawsuits will be resolved soon.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Connecticut’s Attorney General has filed two lawsuits against 28 chemical manufacturers, alleging that they knowingly contaminated the state’s waters and natural resources with PFAS chemicals.
The lawsuits seek to hold these companies accountable for PFAS contamination originating from two sources: the Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting, and PFAS used in manufacturing and added to consumer products like food packaging, cookware, carpeting, upholstery, clothing, and cosmetics.
PFAS can persist indefinitely in the environment and is known to cause severe health problems, including various cancers, liver damage, birth defects, high cholesterol, infertility, and diabetes.
The lawsuits aim to obtain injunctive and monetary relief, requiring the companies to dispose of their toxic chemical stocks, abate pollution in Connecticut, disclose research, and compensate the state for remediation and testing expenses.
The complaints also seek penalties for violations of state laws dating back decades.
The companies are alleged to have known about the toxicity and persistence of PFAS since the 1950s but failed to protect the public, leading to widespread contamination.
Connecticut has already taken steps to ban the use of PFAS in firefighting foam and food packaging, but the state continues to deal with the aftermath of PFAS contamination.
The lawsuits highlight contamination in various water systems and call for accountability from the chemical manufacturers responsible for the pollution.
The legal actions represent Connecticut’s effort to address the serious health and environmental consequences associated with PFAS contamination and hold responsible parties accountable for their actions.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The U.S. District Judge overseeing all lawsuits related to injuries caused by aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting chemical, has granted the parties a 24-week period for core discovery in a selection of cases.
All AFFF lawsuits are consolidated before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in South Carolina for coordinated discovery, pretrial procedures, and early bellwether trials.
While many pending claims involve workplace exposure to AFFF, the judge is prioritizing water contamination cases for the initial trials.
Initial cases involve plaintiffs exposed to contaminated water near specific locations.
A recent case management order affirms that the court has accepted the lists of potential trial cases and outlines the core discovery process for the initial Personal Injury Bellwether Discovery Pool.
The discovery process involves exchanging relevant documents and information and conducting limited depositions over 24 weeks.
Following core discovery, the parties will narrow down the cases to a set of “Initial Personal Injury Bellwether Trial Pool Plaintiffs.”
These cases will undergo additional preparation for trial, including expert reports and dispositive motions practice.
Eight weeks before completing core discovery, the parties are expected to propose a process for selecting the initial personal injury bellwether trial pool plaintiffs, as well as the process leading to the first bellwether trial.
While the outcomes of these early trials will not have a binding impact on other claims, they may influence future firefighter cancer settlement negotiations and the resolution of the litigation.
Apart from individual firefighter claims, the manufacturers also face AFFF water provider lawsuits brought by cities, states, and municipalities seeking damages for removing toxic chemicals from local water supplies.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Hawaii Attorney General Anne E. Lopez has filed a lawsuit against 25 manufacturers of firefighting foam products containing harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
The lawsuit alleges that these companies violated state consumer protection and tort laws by concealing the risks of PFAS products to the environment and human health while continuing to profit from their sale.
The lawsuit seeks to hold the defendants responsible for all PFAS-related costs, including testing, treatment, and monitoring of the state’s natural resources, as well as compensation for residents for the loss of natural resources, disposal costs, civil penalties, restitution, disgorgement, and punitive damages, among other things.
The case filed by the Hawaii AG is the most recent action taken against manufacturers of AFFF, adding to the thousands of claims filed by individuals who have been exposed.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Parties involved in the federal litigation concerning toxic chemicals in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) are preparing to submit a list of personal injury claims that qualify as initial bellwether test cases.
The U.S District Judge overseeing the AFFF MDL will then select 28 cases for case-specific discovery and preparation for test trials.
Bellwether trials in multidistrict litigation are a small group of cases selected to be tried first, serving as a test to gauge trends in a larger number of similar cases.
These initial trials help both parties understand how juries might respond to evidence and testimony, guiding the resolution of remaining cases in the AFFF litigation.
Several manufacturers, including 3M Company, Tyco Fire Products, and Chemguard, Inc., are facing lawsuits alleging they failed to disclose health risks associated with PFAS chemicals in AFFF, as well as the risk of widespread water contamination.
All AFFF lawsuits are currently centralized before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in the District of South Carolina for coordinated discovery, pretrial proceedings, and early bellwether trials.
While many firefighting foam lawsuits claim direct exposure, the first trial dates will prioritize AFFF water contamination cases.
Apart from individual lawsuits, manufacturers also face countless AFFF water contamination lawsuits from cities, states, and municipalities.
In June 2023, 3M Company agreed to pay over $12.5 billion in an AFFF water contamination settlement with local water suppliers, but there have been no reported settlements in AFFF personal injury lawsuits, and none of these individual claims have gone before a jury as of yet.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
More than 6,400 AFFF Lawsuits have been centralized in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.
The focus of the AFFF litigation lately has been on water contamination cases, but lawyers are still accepting cases for individuals who have been exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems.
Many local municipalities, including Myrtle Beach, Georgetown, and North Myrtle Beach, are choosing to turn down a substantial amount of money totaling $10.3 billion from a settlement related to PFAS contamination.
The settlement involves chemical manufacturers 3M and DuPont agreeing to pay these funds.
Experts argue that while it’s a good start, it won’t be enough to fully address the PFAS contamination in America’s drinking water.
PFAS contamination in water systems across the United States has become a major concern, and the use of AFFF firefighting foam has been known to contribute to the issue.
If the settlement is accepted, the money would be distributed among all U.S. public drinking water systems that detect PFAS in their water, but some municipalities are opting out due to concerns about the amount being divided among many sources and the inability to file future claims based on new findings.
The deadline for agencies to opt out is approaching, and South Carolina’s Attorney General has filed a separate lawsuit for natural resource contamination related to PFAS, which is proceeding independently of the water provider settlements.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The Delaware Attorney General, Kathy Jennings, filed a lawsuit against 14 companies, including 3M, over their production of firefighting foam containing “forever chemicals” which have allegedly contaminated soil and aquifers in the state.
The lawsuit alleges that these companies, involved in producing aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), introduced PFAS into the environment, causing damage and health risks for residents.
The state conducted a two-year investigation, including environmental sampling and corporate record reviews, prior to the lawsuit.
Delaware’s previous success in negotiating a $50 million settlement involving PFAS products from companies linked to DuPont led to commitments totaling over $1.1 billion nationwide to resolve PFAS-related claims.
The current lawsuit seeks monetary damages, natural resource compensation, and expenses for testing and responding to contamination caused by the defendants’ PFAS-containing firefighting products.
The lawsuit details alleged attempts by companies, particularly 3M, to conceal the dangers of PFAS and their products, claiming 3M was aware of the risks linked to PFAS since the 1950s and purposefully misled the public.
3M stated it will defend itself in court and is addressing PFAS issues by remediating, investing in water treatment, and collaborating with affected communities.
The case also targets the other 12 companies, suggesting they likely knew the risks associated with PFAS through industry groups and should have been aware of potential dangers associated with their products.
The lawsuit emphasizes the accountability of these companies for the environmental and health impacts caused by their PFAS-containing firefighting foams.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
In a recent study, a nested case-control investigation analyzed patients with thyroid cancer, using plasma samples collected before or at the time of their cancer diagnosis.
The study involved 88 patients with thyroid cancer, matched with 88 healthy controls based on various factors.
The research found that there was a 56% increased rate of thyroid cancer diagnosis associated with higher levels of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (n-PFOS).
This positive association remained significant when analyzing a subset of thyroid cancer cases diagnosed one year or more after plasma sample collection.
These findings suggest a connection between exposure to PFAS and an increased risk of (papillary) thyroid cancer, raising global concerns given the widespread exposure to PFAS.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
The AFFF MDL for individual lawsuits claiming injuries subsequent to AFFF exposure is growing, with nearly 6,000 individual AFFF Lawsuits consolidated into the multidistrict litigation (MDL).
AFFF Lawsuits filed by municipalities for water contamination are nearing a global settlement reportedly worth over $10.3 billion.
The settlement deal would pay for clean-up and remediation costs for municipalities across the country that have dealt with PFAS contamination from AFFF products in local water supplies.
Municipalities welcome this settlement deal, expressing satisfaction that it will be the polluters footing the bill for clean-up, and not the affected residents.
Now, the focus remains on individuals who have filed AFFF Lawsuits against the same set of manufacturers, alleging that their health problems stemmed from exposure to AFFF firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
A new study on the chemicals released from AFFF (aqueous film forming foam) has directly linked AFFF to testicular cancer among male veterans, specifically those who worked as firemen.
The study found that a disproportionate number of military personnel who worked with the foam during their time in service developed testicular cancer later in life.
To conduct the study, researchers drew blood from a group of Air Force veterans which included some who worked as firefighters and some who did not.
After analyzing blood samples, researchers discovered compelling proof that airmen working as firefighters exhibited heightened levels of PFAS in their bloodstream.
They also observed less substantial evidence for individuals residing on sites where the drinking water contained high levels of PFAS.
Additionally, the study’s co-author, Mark Purdue, a senior investigator at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), noted that airmen afflicted with testicular cancer displayed elevated serum levels of PFAS compared to those without a cancer diagnosis.
These new findings only further highlight the dangers of AFFF and the forever chemicals inside of them.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Tyco Fire Protection Products has announced that it will stop producing and selling fluorinated firefighting foams, including Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), by June 2024.
Instead, the company will transition to non-fluorinated foam alternatives.
The decision comes as part of their commitment to providing “more sustainable and effective solutions” for their customers.
The company is reaching out to current foam customers to recommend suitable fire suppression alternatives for their specific needs.
Tyco Fire Protection Products is named as a defendant in the AFFF Lawsuit, and has also previously paid settlements to municipalities in litigation concerning PFAS contamination resulting from firefighting foam usage.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Kentucky has taken legal action against 3M, Chemours, DuPont, and other chemical companies, holding them accountable for the release of PFAS contaminants into the environment within the state.
These PFAS substances originated from the use of AFFF during firefighting operations.
According to the lawsuit, the companies were aware of the risks associated with PFAS and their AFFF products left behind these harmful substances in the environment.
However, Tyco, a government contractor, argues that it produced AFFF as per the government’s specifications and should be excluded from the lawsuit.
Kentucky is seeking compensation for the widespread PFAS contamination across the state, with a particular focus on military facilities and civilian airports that are obligated to use MilSpec AFFF.
The lawsuit demands that the defendants bear the financial responsibility for all costs related to PFAS contamination, which includes conducting investigations, assessments, monitoring, remediation, and restoration of affected areas.
Furthermore, Kentucky seeks damages for harm caused to public property and natural resources.
In previous developments, 3M announced its intention to discontinue the use of PFAS in its products by the end of 2025.
The company recently reached a $12.5 billion settlement with public water systems nationwide to address PFAS contamination.
Additionally, a $1.2 billion settlement was reached between DuPont, Chemours, Corteva, and 300 drinking water providers, marking the first resolution in the consolidated multidistrict litigation concerning drinking water contamination.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing, and THL lawyers are still accepting clients daily.
As of June 16, there have been a total of 4,793 cases filed in the AFFF lawsuit, which includes a mixture of personal injury claims and municipal water contamination cases.
Trial related to municipal water contamination cases was set to begin on June 5, however, 3M reached a tentative deal with the plaintiffs to settle the case for $10 billion.
Though this has not been finalized, a federal judge has given both parties until June 26, 2023 to finalize the agreement.
This settlement will only go toward cities affected by the water contamination, though it indicates that AFFF manufacturers may be willing to go to great lengths to avoid federal court.
This is good news for cases part of the personal injury MDL.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The City of Stuart, Florida’s first trial lawsuit against AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) manufacturers will include the EPA’s proposed limits on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in drinking water as evidence, despite the defendants’ unsuccessful attempts to exclude them.
The defendants argue that the EPA’s limits are provisional and do not reflect the knowledge available during the production period.
The inclusion of these limits strengthens the case for the plaintiff and increases the likelihood of a successful verdict in this MDL.
According to a report by the Environmental Working Group, the estimated cost for the U.S. Government to fully clean up PFAS contamination around more than 50 military bases, caused by the use of AFFF firefighting foam during training exercises, is likely to exceed $30 billion.
If left unaddressed, the PFAS contamination at these military installations could potentially contaminate local water supply systems.
However, the Department of Defense has only allocated $1.4 billion so far to cover the cleanup costs.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and THL lawyers are still accepting clients daily.
Kidde-Fenwal, a company specializing in fire-control systems, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization due to pending lawsuits related to their firefighting foam product, National Foam.
The lawsuits allege that the foam, which contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), has caused contamination of water and soil near airports and military bases.
Kidde-Fenwal is one of the defendants in the multi-district litigation (MDL) regarding PFAS contamination caused by aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).
The company stated that it faces over $1 billion in liability from these claims.
In an effort to address its liability, Kidde-Fenwal plans to submit a proposal to sell the company.
The bankruptcy judge has approved interim motions allowing the company to continue operating and fulfill certain financial obligations during the bankruptcy proceedings.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Over 4,000 AFFF Lawsuits have been filed and are pending in the Firefighting Foam MDL, centralized in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.
The first bellwether trial for the AFFF MDL is currently underway.
The first bellwether trial is the City of Stuart vs. 3M, in which the Florida municipality is alleging that manufacturers of AFFF are liable for PFAS contamination in the water supply.
More lawsuits are being filed against AFFF manufacturers by states, cities, and governmental agencies across the country.
Most recently, the states of Maine and Kentucky have filed lawsuits against PFAS/AFFF manufacturers.
More attention is being paid to the incidence of cancers in firefighters across the country.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently established the National Firefighter Registry (NFR) for Cancer.
The registry seeks to better understand the link between firefighting and cancer, and we expect that firefighting foam could be a subject of interest to the registry.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are accepting new clients daily.
As the AFFF MDL has grown to over 4,000+ plaintiffs, there has been increased scrutiny on manufacturers and other PFAS polluters.
The Delaware state government is making steps toward an accounting program for PFAS-containing firefighting foam.
The Illinois Attorney General has filed a lawsuit against firefighting foam manufacturers, stating that:
“The companies benefit while knowingly contaminating Illinois’ environment and natural resources.”
Wisconsin’s State Department of Natural Resources is considering action against Tyco Fire Products for the contamination of land near their Peshtigo.
If you or a loved one were exposed to toxic firefighting foam and suffered as a result, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit instantly. We’re here to help.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases from people who have suffered from exposure.
Recently, the International Association of Firefighters (IAF) filed a complaint against the National Fire Protection Association for “its role in imposing a testing standard that effectively requires the use of PFAS in fire fighter protective gear.”
According to the IAF, the NFPA requires an Ultraviolet Degradation Test for certain pieces of protective firefighter gear, and the only chemical that can withstand 40 hour of UV light without degradation is PFAS.
If you or a loved one have been harmed by PFAS in firefighting foam or gear, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The first bellwether trial in the AFFF MDL, set for May 2023, will be the City of Stuart, Florida vs. 3M.
The City of Stuart claims that AFFF produced by 3M contaminated the city’s water system.
If you or a loved one have suffered as a result of being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Want to find out if you qualify for a lawsuit instantly?
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit in under two minutes.
The Firefighting Foam Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
The City of Mansfield, Ohio is taking legal action against companies that are alleged to have contaminated the ground at the Lahm Regional Airport.
The city is pursuing litigation against companies such as 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products and Chemguard.
In an email, a city official said that these companies are responsible for restoring the “enormous costs and expenses” that the city has incurred as a result of the ongoing contamination of the airport with PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals.”
Despite the planned legal action, the city has reassured residents that the drinking water is safe.
The alleged contamination is said to have originated from fire-fighting foam used by firefighters from the Ohio Air National Guard based at the airport.
The City Council voted unanimously to engage outside legal counsel to pursue the litigation related to PFAS.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are accepting cases to be consolidated in the multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873).
Nearly 3,400 AFFF lawsuits are consolidated in the US District Court: District of South Carolina.
The lawsuit is moving through early developments, and bellwether trials are set to begin in the first half of this year.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting new clients and filing claims on their behalf.
The AFFF litigation will be unique – the lawsuits involve both firefighters suffering from cancer, as well as communities impacted by water contamination via AFFF use.
Bellwether trials are scheduled to begin in 2023.
Visit this page for more updates on the AFFF litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF lawsuit instantly.
The judge presiding over the AFFF MDL has rejected a motion for summary judgment filed by 3M’s defense team.
The 3M legal team attempted to argue that the company was not liable for injuries related to AFFF products, protected by the fact they were a government contractor.
This means that a number of claims that would have been thrown out due to the motion for summary judgment are safe to move forward.
The first bellwether trial for the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits consolidated in the MDL 2873 is scheduled for December 2022.
Visit this page for the latest AFFF lawsuit update news.
More and more cases are being added to MDL 2873, the AFFF lawsuit multidistrict litigation in the US District Court: District of South Carolina.
Over 2,700 cases have been added to the MDL since it was established in January 2019.
Lawsuits are continuing to be added to the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL, totaling well over 2,500 cases now consolidated.
If you or a loved one have suffered from exposure to toxic firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify instantly.
Firefighters, military personnel, chemical plant workers, and others exposed to AFFF Firefighting Foam could be at risk for developing serious, long-term health problems.
The foams, known as aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), have been used for decades to fight fires caused by highly flammable liquids and gasses.
While effective for fighting fires, AFFF also contains cancer-causing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that have been tied to birth defects, heart disease, hormonal imbalances, and other complications.
Government agencies have already started working to destroy PFAS and phase out firefighting foams. Many people who have used or been exposed to AFFF at work and in their community now face complications from PFAS exposure.
These workers and their families were told that AFFF Firefighting Foam was safe, but they are now dealing with health problems and medical bills related to their exposure to PFAS.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and later developed complications, you could be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering.
Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), are the most effective material for combating fires in flammable liquids and gasses. The foam has been used for decades and helped save human lives and crucial infrastructure.
Despite its fire-fighting efficiency, AFFF have become phased out and banned in many parts of the country.
The foams contain toxic, man-made chemicals known as PFAS that are linked to environmental contamination and health complications such as cancer, heart disease, and birth defects.
Companies that supplied AFFF firefighting foam to fire departments, military bases, airports, and others are the defendants named in AFFF lawsuits.
These companies include:
The Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) MDL continues to grow, with nearly 9,900 pending AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits filed as of October 2024.
New AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits are currently being filed by lawyers across the country.
Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) are Class B firefighting foams that are used to fight high-hazard flammable liquid fires such as those caused by oil, gasoline, and jet fuel.
These foams are mixed with water to form an aqueous film that cuts off a fire’s source of oxygen, extinguishes it, and stops it from reigniting. AFFF are commonly used at fire stations, military sites, airports, and chemical manufacturing plants.
While AFFF are highly effective in fighting high-hazard flammable liquid fires, they have also become a source of concern due to their ties to cancer diagnosis, health problems and environmental contamination.
AFFF contains synthetic chemicals known as PFAS.
AFFF have been used by fire departments, military personnel, and many other industries since the 1970s.
The persistent use of these foams, particularly on military bases and training sites, has led to PFAS making their way into the environment and local water supplies.
PFAS water contamination has made headlines in Chicago, St. Louis, and across the country.
PFAS, meaning perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals found in many consumer and industrial products.
The most common PFAS are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). They are known for their ability to resist water, oil, and grease.
PFAS were commonly used for:
While effective for their intended use, growing bodies of scientific evidence have documented PFAS as a toxic substance that is likely unsafe for human health. PFAS are no longer manufactured in the United States, but continue to be found in the environment and in humans.
PFAS contamination is a huge problem in the United States, and many lawsuits have been filed over the issue.
These chemicals do not break down and remain in the water, air, and soil. High levels of exposure to PFAS have been linked to a variety of potential negative health defects including cancer.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has formed a council to “protect public health and the environment from the impacts of PFAS”, and developed a roadmap to address the issue from a governmental standpoint.
PFAS are active in AFFF firefighting foam.
While some fire departments have switched to “modern fluorotelomer foams” that might be less toxic, the long shelf life of traditional, PFAS-containing AFFF means they are still stored and used at many work sites.
It’s not always easy to determine if firefighting foam contains PFAS, but it’s more likely if the ingredient list mentions C6, fluorosurfactants, or fluoroproteins.
Due to their potential toxicity, the U.S. Department of Defense is working to develop better PFAS-free AFFF alternatives.
Exposure to the chemicals in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) has been tied to a number of serious, sometimes life-threatening complications.
The foams contain PFAS that have been labeled a public health concern by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
According to the U.S. Department of Veteran’s Affairs, human exposure to PFAS might be associated with:
The chance of developing health problems due to AFFF and subsequent PFAS exposure depends on several factors including the frequency and duration of exposure.
Growing bodies of science have linked PFAS to health complications with some indicating that even low-level exposure could be dangerous for humans. PFAS can concentrate over time in the human body, with some having a half-life up to eight years.
For workers regularly exposed to firefighting foam, the risk for developing certain medical conditions is higher.
AFFF exposure can happen in a number of ways. Occupational exposure to firefighting foam is the most common.
The introductory information on the MDL 2873 webpage also says the following in terms of AFFF exposure:
“These cases all involve varied causes of action and claims relating to per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Plaintiffs generally allege that aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) containing perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and/or perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), two types of PFAS, contaminated groundwater near various military bases, airports, and other industrial sites where AFFFs were used to extinguish liquid fuel fires.”
A growing number of studies have linked the perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in AFFF firefighting foam to cancer risks.
Several studies on both occupational and community PFAS exposure have found increased rates of testicular and kidney cancers.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified PFOA, a common PFAS, and potentially carcinogenic (cancer-causing) to humans.
Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have noted increased risks of certain cancers associated with exposure to PFAS.
Cancers that have been associated with PFAS chemicals include:
Other health problems associated with PFAS chemicals include:
Research on PFAS exposure and cancer continues to develop.
As PFAS chemicals and forever chemicals remain in the environment and impact human health for decades, more extensive research is bound to be completed about its effects on our environment and health.
Civilian and military firefighters are at the highest risk of developing complications from AFFF and PFAS exposure, especially if their workplaces did not provide the United States Fire Administration’s recommended firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE).
Workers could also be at risk if they were in industries where AFFF was used to fight Class B fires such as fires at:
PFAS have also become a major community and environmental issue, as PFAS have contaminated the tap water of at least 16 million people in 33 states and Puerto Rico and the groundwater in 38 states.
Many firefighter and military families — and their neighbors — worry that years of exposure to PFAS from firefighting foams have caused long-term damage.
Others have already developed complications and injuries from using the foams at work or having their water systems contaminated.
Victims of AFFF and PFAS exposure deserve justice, and there are resources available to help.
If you sustained injuries or developed chemical exposure injuries and complications from using, being exposed to, or having your community contaminated by AFFF firefighting foams, there are steps you can take to better your situation.
Report and document your injuries and complications.
You should report your injuries to your local OSHA office as well as any government entities overseeing worker-related injuries and exposure complaints within your industry.
Be sure to report the exposure to your health care provider and have them conduct a thorough health screening on you.
Military veterans who developed complications they believe are from PFAS exposure during service can contact the Department of Veterans Affairs Environmental Health Coordinators and/or file a claim.
It’s crucial that you mitigate your injuries and complications.
Mitigation involves seeking medical care and following your doctor’s recommendations.
Document your complications and injuries (with photos, writing, etc.) and track your doctors’ visits, medical treatments, medications, and any subsequent expenses.
This evidence will help you heal and gives you a stronger case in a potential AFFF lawsuit.
Contact a Firefighting Foam Attorney to discuss your injuries, complications, and any other problems you might have developed due to exposure to PFAS in firefighting foams.
He or she will help you better understand your situation and if you have the potential for compensation from AFFF manufacturers, your employer, or other companies or agencies responsible for your PFAS exposure.
This will help determine if you should hire an AFFF attorney to pursue an AFFF lawsuit.
If you or a loved one have been exposed to PFAS from AFFF Firefighting Foam and were subsequently diagnosed with related injuries or complications, you could be eligible for compensation through an AFFF lawsuit.
Evidence in an AFFF lawsuit is extremely important. Your AFFF lawyers with help you determine what evidence to present in a court of law.
Evidence in AFFF lawsuits may include:
Firefighting foam cancer lawyers will help victims assess their damages. Damages refer to the total economic and non-economic losses a person has suffered due to AFFF exposure.
Experienced firefighting foam lawyers, with the help of the claimant, will calculate your damages and demand compensation from the defendants.
Typical damages for AFFF foam lawsuits may include:
Contact an AFFF attorney with experience in toxic tort, chemical exposure, and personal injury lawsuits to discuss your potential case.
An experienced law firm will work diligently through the civil litigation process to prove liability and help ensure your case is as strong as possible.
TorHoerman Law understands that AFFF foam lawsuits may involve cancer diagnosis and other hardships endured by victims and their families.
Our law firm will work tirelessly to ensure that you and your family are fully compensated for exposure to firefighting foam and the health issues related to AFFF exposure.
Any law firm you contact for your claim should be willing to go the extra mile to secure compensation that you are rightfully owed.
Always take the choice of a lawyer with extreme discretion.
AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873) in the US District Court: District of South Carolina.
Multidistrict litigation, commonly referred to as MDL, is a special federal legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex litigations by consolidating cases and addressing all pretrial procedures in one court.
Cases involving similar causation and injuries are consolidating them into a singular district court, ensuring that decisions and settlement amounts are consistent.
TorHoerman Law’s team of experienced firefighting foam lawyers are representing those facing complications due to PFAS and firefighting foam exposure.
Our personal injury lawyers have helped thousands of victims across all 50 states take on hundreds of companies that put workers, community members, and consumers at risk.
Over the past 11 years, our law firm has helped clients gain over $4 Billion in verdicts and negotiated settlements to help them get back on the path to recovery.
If you or a loved one have developed cancer or other adverse health outcomes after being regularly exposed to fire fighting foam, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Cancer Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law AFFF Lawyers for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for an AFFF Foam Lawsuit instantly.
Class-B aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) are dangerous and contain PFAS chemicals that have been linked to a number of adverse health risks.
Yes, aqueous film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) contains toxic chemicals called PFAS which are linked to a number of adverse health risks including cancer, birth defects, and chronic conditions.
A number of studies have found that AFFF exposure may be linked to an increased risk of a number of cancers including:
People who may have been regularly exposed to firefighting foam are typically people whose work duties include using or transporting firefighting foam products.
Individuals are also may suffer PFAS exposure through contaminated drinking water.
People who are most likely to suffer from occupational exposure to PFAS in firefighting foam include:
If you were ever exposed to firefighting foam and developed cancer or other medical problems, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit, regardless of when you were exposed.
Many states and jurisdictions have rules to allow lawsuits over products that were previously unknown to cause harm.
The statute of limitations is extended to the date that a person should have reasonably discovered the link between their diagnosis and the product(s) potentially to blame.
Contact our law firm for more information on the statute of limitations in your AFFF Lawsuit.
Experienced Firefighting Foam Attorneys can help you through every step of the legal process.
The main things Firefighting Foam Lawyers can help you with are:
Our law firm operates on a contingency fee basis, which means that our Firefighting Foam Attorneys DO NOT charge for their legal representation unless your case wins.
If you are not awarded a settlement for your AFFF Lawsuit, you do not have to pay a cent in legal fees.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL