You may be eligible to file a Tylenol Autism ADHD Lawsuit / Acetaminophen Autism ADHD Claim if you or a loved one used Tylenol and/ or Acetaminophen during pregnancy, and your child was subsequently diagnosed with ADHD or Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Legal action is being strategized by our attorneys for Horizon Therapeutics’ failure to properly warn patients of potential hearing loss side effects.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Over 140,000 Exactech hip, knee and ankle implants have been recalled due to packaging errors that can lead to the breakdown of parts vital to the device’s function.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from an Exactech implant device, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
Over one million people, who were present at Camp Lejeune (North Carolina) between 1953 and 1987, may have been exposed to toxic substances in the water.
The Camp Lejeune Contaminated Water Lawsuit can apply to you, a family member, or a loved one who lived at Camp Lejeune (North Carolina) and suffered health effects from the decades of water contamination that occurred.
If you have been exposed to Paraquat and diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease may be eligible to pursue compensation, and entitled to participate in the paraquat lawsuit.
Contact us today to see if you qualify for the Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit!
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Paragard FAQ: Is There a Paragard Class Action Lawsuit?
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Paragard Lawsuit.
Contact the Paragard Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Product Liability
» Paragard FAQ: Is There a Paragard Class Action Lawsuit?
Last Updated: September 14th, 2023
Overview of the Paragard Lawsuit Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)
Question: Is there a Paragard Class Action Lawsuit?
No, the Paragard IUD Lawsuit is being consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Many claimants have filed their complaints in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Allegations include device breakage during removal, migration within the body, organ perforation, and other severe health complications.
On this page, we‘ll discuss this question in further depth, injuries related to Paragard IUD Devices, average Paragard settlement values, and much more.
Intro to the Paragard Multidistrict Litigation
The Paragard IUD, a popular long-acting reversible contraceptive, has been used by countless women to prevent pregnancy for decades.
Reports of adverse events and complications associated with its use have led to a wave of legal action against its manufacturers.
As these concerns escalated, individuals who experienced these issues began pursuing legal recourse.
While you may have heard about Paragard lawsuits, it’s essential to understand the distinction between multidistrict litigation (MDL) and class action lawsuits.
In an MDL proceeding, claims from multiple plaintiffs are consolidated into one court and overseen by one judge.
This process ensures that each plaintiff receives individualized attention, as they’re not lumped into a single class action lawsuit.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries related to the Paragard IUD device, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and pursue financial compensation.
The Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal process consolidating multiple individual cases involving the Paragard IUD’s alleged injuries and complications.
It streamlines pretrial proceedings to promote efficiency and consistency in handling similar cases.
As of mid-August 2022, the Paragard MDL included approximately 1,314 plaintiffs.
The number of complaints in the Paragard MDL is anticipated to rise significantly for several reasons including:
Awareness: As more individuals become aware of the MDL and the alleged complications associated with Paragard, they might be more inclined to come forward with their experiences and join the litigation.
Legal Representation: Lawyers and law firms specializing in medical device litigation are actively reviewing potential claims related to Paragard. As they identify more individuals who have suffered alleged injuries from the device, the number of lawsuits filed will likely increase.
Media Attention: High-profile litigations often attract media attention. As the Paragard MDL gains more coverage, it could lead to a surge in the number of plaintiffs seeking legal recourse.
The Paragard MDL is a significant legal development in the realm of medical device litigation.
Its outcome could set precedents for similar cases in the future and influence the medical device industry’s practices and standards.
Paragard lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) to manage pretrial proceedings efficiently while maintaining the individuality of each case.
Paragard attorneys can provide essential assistance if you’ve experienced injuries or complications due to the Paragard IUD.
They can help you understand your legal rights, gather necessary evidence, navigate the complex legal process, and advocate to seek justice and compensation.
The Paragard IUD, also known as the Copper T 380A, is a birth control device designed to provide long-term contraception without using hormones.
It is a T-shaped device inserted into the uterus by a healthcare professional.
The device features a copper coil, which creates a toxic environment for sperm, preventing fertilization.
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Paragard IUD as a safe and effective contraceptive option, numerous individuals have reported severe complications and injuries related to its use.
Women who have experienced these complications while using a Paragard IUD device may face severe pain, bleeding, and infection, even requiring surgical intervention for device removal.
If you or a loved one were injured by a Paragard IUD device, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law’s Paragard Lawyers for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Paragard Lawsuit instantly.
While there has been an increase in the number of Paragard IUD Lawsuits filed by affected victims, the FDA has yet to issue a Paragard recall.
The issues surrounding Paragard IUD failure makes it crucial for doctors and healthcare providers to be aware of the Paragard IUD risks and discuss them with their patients.
Paragard Lawsuits Filed Against Manufacturers
The Paragard intrauterine device was approved by the FDA in 1984 and is the only copper IUD available in the country.
The original manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, started selling the device in 1988.
In 2017, Teva Pharmaceuticals sold the Paragard IUD rights to Cooper Surgical, Inc.
As the FDA-approved manufacturers and distributors of the device, both Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical are the named defendants in numerous pending Paragard IUD lawsuits.
Plaintiffs allege that these companies failed to appropriately warn patients and physicians about the potential risks of this contraceptive device.
They argue that they would not have used Paragard without knowing these risks.
Given the severity of the injuries and complications associated with the Paragard IUDs, legal action against the manufacturers is necessary to hold them accountable for the harm caused to patients.
By seeking compensation through the legal system, affected individuals can pursue justice and alleviate some financial burdens they may face.
Injuries Related to Paragard IUD Devices
The reported injuries associated with Paragard IUDs are deeply concerning and have led to a wave of Paragard IUD injury lawsuits against the device’s manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Cooper Surgical.
Some of the most common Paragard IUD complications and injuries include:
Device Migration: The Paragard IUD may migrate from its original placement within the uterus, potentially causing damage to nearby organs and tissues.
Fracturing: The Paragard device has been known to fracture during removal attempts, leading to fragments remaining in the body and causing pain, infection, and other complications.
Device Breakage: In some cases, the Paragard implant may break upon IUD removal, requiring additional surgery to remove broken IUD pieces left behind.
Uterine Perforation: Improper insertion, migration, or fracturing of the Paragard IUD can result in the device puncturing the uterine wall, leading to severe pain and bleeding.
Chronic Pain and Inflammation: Some women using a Paragard IUD have reported ongoing pelvic pain and inflammation, often due to infection associated with Paragard IUD fractured pieces.
Infections: Infection, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), is a possible side effect of IUD use, mainly if the device migrates or fragments remain in the body.
The physical, emotional, and financial toll of Paragard-related injuries on affected individuals can be significant.
Many women have had to undergo multiple surgeries to address these complications, leading to medical expenses, lost wages, and decreased quality of life.
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Vs. Class Action
Knowing the difference between a class action lawsuit and multidistrict litigation (MDL) is essential when considering legal action related to Paragard IUDs.
A class action lawsuit enables individuals to combine their claims into a single case and share in the outcome of that case.
This type of lawsuit is typical where the damages suffered by each individual may be minor, but the cumulative damages may be substantial.
An MDL, however, allows multiple similar cases involving a common defendant to be consolidated and coordinated under a single federal judge.
MDL streamlines pretrial proceedings, such as discovery, to avoid duplicative efforts and inconsistent rulings across various courts.
This legal process can lead to a more equitable outcome for those affected by Paragard IUDs, as each claimant may be entitled to receive individualized compensation according to their circumstances if the Paragard litigation is successful.
New Paragard Lawsuits are considered for consolidation into the MDL.
Critical Differences Between MDL and Class Action Lawsuits
For individuals considering filing new Paragard IUD lawsuits, it is vital to understand the differences between MDLs and class action lawsuits.
Many law firms will advertise their services for the “Paragard Class Action Lawsuit”, or the “Paragard Class Action MDL”, but these terms are incorrect.
There is only a Paragard MDL.
These are the significant differences between multidistrict litigation (MDL) and class action lawsuits:
Case Consolidation: While MDL and class action lawsuits involve multiple plaintiffs, MDL consolidates cases for pretrial purposes only, allowing each case to maintain its individuality during the trial. Class action lawsuits, on the other hand, involve a single representative plaintiff representing the entire class.
Individualized Nature of MDL Cases: In MDL, each case remains separate, preserving the unique circumstances of each plaintiff. This individualized approach allows for more tailored compensation based on the specific injuries and damages suffered.
Settlement Phase Disparities: In MDL, cases may be returned to their original courts for trial if they don’t reach a settlement during pretrial proceedings. Meanwhile, a single trial can determine the outcome for all class members in a class action.
Benefits of MDL for Paragard IUD Defect Lawsuits
Given the unique circumstances of each Paragard IUD lawsuit, an MDL allows for a more equitable outcome.
The benefits of establishing an MDL for Paragard IUD lawsuits include the following:
Efficiency and Faster Resolution: MDL streamlines pretrial processes, reducing costs and expediting legal proceedings. By consolidating all similar claims, the process moves more quickly through the legal system.
Individualized Compensation: Unlike class action settlements, each plaintiff in an MDL may receive an award based on their injuries, which can be more appropriate than a one-size-fits-all settlement.
Expertise: MDL centralizes knowledge and resources, ensuring a consistent and informed legal approach.
Cost Efficiency: MDL is a cost-effective way to manage large quantities of related cases.
The Paragard MDL: What You Need To Know
Over 2,000 pending Paragard IUD lawsuits have been consolidated in the Paragard MDL overseen by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Paragard MDL Judge Leigh Martin May is presiding over proceedings in the Paragard Lawsuit.
Paragard MDL Judge May selected 10 Paragard cases to go through the discovery phase for the bellwether process.
Then, three of those cases will move forward to the first round of bellwether trials, including one chosen by the plaintiffs, one by the defense, and one by the court.
The outcome of these cases will help determine how to handle future Paragard IUD claims and provide insight into potential Paragard settlement values.
The first Paragard bellwether trial is set for March 2024.
Note that Paragard litigation is still in its early stages, and global Paragard settlement agreements have not yet been reached.
Consulting with experienced Paragard IUD lawyers is vital before deciding how best to proceed.
Your legal team can help evaluate your case and determine the best course of action.
TorHoerman Law: Your Paragard Lawyers
Our expert Paragard IUD Lawsuit attorneys have the experience and resources to secure justice on your behalf.
With over a century in combined litigation experience and more than $4 billion awarded to clients in our litigations, our results and expertise speak for themselves.
TorHoerman Law focuses on helping those injured through no fault of their own.
We are dedicated to our practice of holding pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers accountable for their greed-driven actions that put consumers at risk.
We offer free, zero-obligation case evaluations for all of our clients.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to a Paragard IUD break or migration, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.
Jordan Terry
TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.
Dave Woodley
All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.
Jordan Butler
I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!
Maddy Moeller
Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!
Karen Hersman
A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!
Angel Truesdale
They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!
Paul Graegin
The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.
Carie Terry
The attorneys at THL were extremely helpful with the legal aspects of setting up my small business.
Chicago
Edwardsville
St. Louis
Other Illinois Locations
Other Missouri Locations
