You may be eligible to file a Tylenol Autism ADHD Lawsuit / Acetaminophen Autism ADHD Claim if you or a loved one used Tylenol and/ or Acetaminophen during pregnancy, and your child was subsequently diagnosed with ADHD or Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Over 140,000 Exactech hip, knee and ankle implants have been recalled due to packaging errors that can lead to the breakdown of parts vital to the device’s function.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from an Exactech implant device, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
Over one million people, who were present at Camp Lejeune (North Carolina) between 1953 and 1987, may have been exposed to toxic substances in the water.
The Camp Lejeune Contaminated Water Lawsuit can apply to you, a family member, or a loved one who lived at Camp Lejeune (North Carolina) and suffered health effects from the decades of water contamination that occurred.
If you have been exposed to Paraquat and diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease may be eligible to pursue compensation, and entitled to participate in the paraquat lawsuit.
Contact us today to see if you qualify for the Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit!
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Roundup Lawsuit Update 2023 | Average Roundup Settlement Per Person
Use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly. You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Product Liability, Toxic Torts
» Roundup Lawsuit Update 2023 | Average Roundup Settlement Per Person
Last Updated: September 18th, 2023
TorHoerman Law - The Premier Roundup Lawsuit Attorneys
The active ingredient in Roundup (Glyphosate) has been linked to an increased cancer risk, specifically Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
Roundup Lawsuits are being filed against BayerAG and Monsanto for failing to warn consumers about the dangers of Roundup exposure.
Over 80% of Roundup Lawsuits, which amount to over 100,00 cases, have been settled. The landmark $10 billion settlement agreement includes $1.25 billion for future Roundup claims.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
If you or a loved one was exposed to Roundup regularly and subsequently was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another form of cancer – you may qualify to file a Roundup lawsuit.
The best way to determine if you qualify is to speak with an experienced Roundup lawyer.
The average payout for an individual who has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other cancers is between $5,000 to $250,000 in compensation.
One report stated that the average amount per client suffering from cancer is $160,000.
There have been a number of people who have been diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to Roundup.
These individuals have filed lawsuits against Monsanto/Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup.
The Roundup lawsuits claim that Bayer knew or should have known that Roundup was dangerous and failed to warn consumers of the risks associated with its use.
Bayer denies these claims and is currently appealing a number of Roundup verdicts.
The Roundup litigation is currently in the appeals process.
It is unclear how long the appeals will take or what the final outcome will be.
The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and TorHoerman Law’s team of Roundup lawyers are still accepting clients.
Two Roundup Lawsuit trials in St. Louis county are set to begin within the next few months, and it appears they both involve plaintiffs who used Roundup for more than 10 years and were subsequently diagnosed with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
September 2nd, 2023 Update:
The Missouri Supreme Court rejected plaintiffs’ attempt to have a trial held in the City of St. Louis for cases alleging cancer caused by Roundup exposure.
Although none of the plaintiffs reside in Missouri, the trial court had consolidated their cases into a single trial in the City of St. Louis.
BCLP, serving as legal and appellate counsel, successfully halted this move by recommending an emergency writ petition that the Supreme Court ultimately granted.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Monsanto has recently filed a motion seeking to exclude the viewpoints of Dr. Ron Schiff, an expert witness representing one of the plaintiffs in the Roundup case.
Dr. Schiff has played a substantial role by offering his expert medical opinion regarding the link between glyphosate exposure and lymphoma in the Roundup litigation.
However, Monsanto is currently asserting that Dr. Schiff’s opinions should be considered unreliable and excluded due to flawed methodology.
It’s worth noting that Monsanto’s prior endeavors to exclude expert witness testimonies have achieved limited success.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Bayer AG has agreed to pay $6.9 million to settle claims made by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused the company of misleading consumers with its advertising of Roundup weedkiller.
The settlement resolves allegations that Bayer and its Monsanto unit failed to provide evidence for their claims that Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate, was environmentally safe. The advertising statements that were deemed misleading included assertions that Roundup only harmed weeds and not animal wildlife, as well as suggestions that Roundup was safer than detergent and soap.
The settlement requires Bayer to stop advertising Roundup as a safe and non-toxic product.
The $6.9 million will be used to mitigate the impact of pesticides on pollinators and aquatic species.
Bayer did not admit or deny wrongdoing but expressed satisfaction with the settlement.
The attorney general’s investigation did not draw scientific conclusions about Roundup’s safety. Bayer has faced extensive litigation over the alleged cancer-causing effects of Roundup since its acquisition of Monsanto in 2018, settling a significant portion of the claims for $10.9 billion in 2020.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Monsanto has won the past seven Roundup trials, including the most recent trial in St. Louis County, but our lawyers are still accepting cases and speaking to clients daily about their situations. The defendants’ victories in recent Roundup trials might dissuade those diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma from seeking legal action, but it is imperative that you consult with an experienced Roundup Lawyer who can assess your eligibility and provide you with options for your Roundup Lawsuit.
It is also to be considered that the defendants’ recent victories are a part of their overall legal strategy regarding the Roundup Lawsuit: they will only take certain cases they are confident in winning to trial. Other cases that defendants are not confident they will win in a trial setting are better poised to be settled.
There are three additional Roundup trials scheduled for next month. Visit this page for more updates.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
May 4th Update:
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing. Our Roundup Lawyers are speaking to potential clients and assessing their eligibility to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Several Roundup Lawsuits have gone to trial in front of a jury, with the most recent Roundup trial beginning on April 26th in St. Louis court.
Successful Roundup Lawsuits may be entitled to monetary compensation for the damages incurred by Roundup exposure. Damages in a Roundup Lawsuit for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma may include demands of payment for the following:
Medical bills
Future medical expenses
Lost wages or earning ability
Lost quality of life
Permanent disability
Other compensatory and punitive damages
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup Lawsuit, and contact our law firm to speak to one of our Roundup Lawyers today.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma or another related health problem, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Litigation is ongoing, and our Roundup Lawyers are still accepting new clients. Although there was a settlement reached and most claims have been paid, there is a fund available for future lawsuits.
If you were exposed to Roundup at work or while using it at home, it’s important that you retain evidence such as the following:
Receipts of purchase
Medical records
Employment records
Personal testimony documenting Roundup use and its effects
If you or a loved one used Roundup and subsequently developed medical conditions related to exposure, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Roundup Lawsuits continue to be filed in courts across the country, and lawyers are still accepting clients.
Monsanto and Bayer have been on the offensive and are attempting to have cases dismissed, but many of their actions have been halted by state and federal courts.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed cancer or another related illness, you may be eligible for legal action.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers are accepting clients from across the country.
The pace of lawsuits being added to the multidistrict litigation has slowed in the past year, but there are more people out there that do qualify for compensation and should contact an attorney as soon as possible.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Roundup MDL.
If you or a loved one have been exposed to Roundup and subsequently suffered related health problems, you may be eligible for a lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Bayer is still attempting to have Roundup Lawsuits dismissed, despite the Supreme Court refusing to hear its appeal to dismiss legal action surrounding the weed killer in June 2022.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals will review its previous ruling that deals with the issue of whether federal pesticide law takes precedence over state failure-to-warn claims.
Though this is a win for Bayer, it does not guarantee by any means that Roundup Lawsuits will be dismissed any time soon.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit instantly.
Attorneys are still accepting clients and filing claims for Roundup Lawsuits. Recently, several lawsuits have settled for plaintiffs, and others have gone to trial.
Cases are still being consolidated into multidistrict litigation.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
Last month, news came out that spoke to how widespread Roundup contamination may be in the United States.
A CDC study, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, found that Glyphosate, the chemical in Roundup linked to cancer, was present in 80% (1,885 of 2,310) of urine samples from test subjects.
The study included participants representative of the U.S. population, with around one third of participants being children aged 6 and older.
Cases are continually being added to the Roundup multidistrict litigation (MDL 2741).
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Bayer in the most recent Roundup Bellwether Trial, a move that may have major implications on the remaining Roundup lawsuits that have yet to be tried.
Bayer’s appeal argued that an EPA filing that declared Roundup safe to use superseded California’s failure-to-warn law, where the lawsuits are consolidated.
If the appeal was accepted, thousands of Roundup lawsuits would have likely been thrown out.
The Supreme Court decision means that Bayer/Monsanto is liable to pay the $25 million settlement decided in the bellwether and preemption cannot be used as an argument by the defense.
Most recently, Monsanto appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss Roundup Lawsuits based on the argument that legal action for injuries caused by Roundup are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Bayer is still dealing with tens of thousands of lawsuits filed in both state and federal courts over claims that Roundup, the discontinued weed killer, is linked to cancer.
In 2018 Bayer acquired Monsanto, which developed and patented Roundup, and has assumed the legal responsibilities tied to the weed killer.
On April 7th, Bayer reached a settlement with a number of claims that were scheduled to go to trial in front of a St. Louis court.
The cases, filed in 2017, join the nearly 100,000 others settled by Bayer.
There has been a push by plaintiffs’ attorneys to file Roundup cases in state court, as many people have been waiting far too long for a trial or settlement.
Roundup Lawsuits concern the links between chronic exposure to the weed killer and cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
A 2015 report from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) bridged the potential link between the chemical component, glyphosate, and cancer.
The report referenced studies that showed that there was “sufficient evidence” glyphosate causes cancer in animals as well as damaging effects on human cells.
Recent studies suggest that the popular Roundup weedkiller could be deadly to more than just unwanted plants.
In relation to these studies and IARC’s findings, lawsuits were filed against Roundup manufacturer, Monsanto.
The Roundup lawsuit claims that exposure to a chemical component of the herbicide, glyphosate, causes Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
What is Glyphosate?
Glyphosate, a common agent in herbicides, targets specific enzymes in weeds to eradicate them without damaging other plants. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto Co.’s Roundup weed killer.
On a yearly average, American farmers spray nearly a pound of glyphosate on every acre of cropland.
Farmers and landscapers who use Roundup regularly are often exposed to high levels of glyphosate.
Because of the herbicide’s popularity in the agricultural industry, trace amounts of glyphosate have been found in corn, soy, and wheat-based products.
Alarmingly, the chemical has also been detected in human urine samples and women’s breast milk.
Monsanto claims that the chemical is completely harmless to humans, citing years of in-house studies conducted on glyphosate.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has backed up Monsanto’s claim, citing their own findings which show no link between glyphosate and increased risk of cancer for humans.
Why Isn't Glyphosate Considered Dangerous by the EPA?
The Environmental Protection Agency’s long-standing position is that glyphosate exposure and low-level consumption does not pose any risk to humans.
According to their website, Monsanto supports these claims with their own in-house studies, which have found glyphosate to be “more than 10 times less toxic than caffeine.”
Despite Monsanto’s statements, a number of U.S. agricultural workers and landscapers are currently suing Monsanto, claiming that by using Roundup they were exposed to high levels of glyphosate which caused them to develop Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.
Monsanto stands by their safety claims, stating “in more than 700 studies, no one has associated cancer with the use of glyphosate.”
However, information obtained through the first cases against Monsanto shows that the EPA reports are likely compromised.
Within the documents lies a chain of Monsanto internal emails, and email communications between the company and EPA staff, suggesting that the EPA research had been ghostwritten by Monsanto, and later signed off by EPA academics.
In one such email, Monsanto executive William F. Heydens wrote, “we would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing and they [EPA] would just edit & sign their names so to speak.”
There is also evidence that one EPA senior official had worked directly with Monsanto directors to put a halt to further investigations by other federal health agencies into the potential adverse effects of glyphosate.
Other documents indicate that an EPA senior officials had worked with Monsanto to hide a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study reviewing glyphosate, which suggested the herbicide could be a carcinogen.
A series of EPA internal emails revealed a great level of dispute among employees about the safety of glyphosate.
Even within the EPA, there seems to be a polarizing disagreement of whether glyphosate is hazardous for humans.
The agency is currently conducting a scheduled evaluation of the chemical though there is no indication of when the results of the evaluation will be published.
Roundup weed killers have been banned in:
The Netherlands
France
Bermuda
Columbia
Sri Lanka
And recently, in Vietnam
On April 11, 2019, Vietnam removed herbicides containing glyphosate from the market because of the damaging effects it has on the environment and severe health consequences for the population.
“The decision to remove herbicides containing glyphosate from the list of plant protection chemicals permitted for use in Vietnam is in accordance with the current law, international regulations and in line with Vietnam’s socio-economic conditions,” Hoang Trung, head of the Plant Protection Department under Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development said in the statement.
The herbicide is Monsanto’s flagship product.
Being sold internationally for both mass agricultural purposes and as an at-home gardening applicant, it is the most widely used herbicide in the world.
There are currently more than 700 roundup cancer lawsuits filed against Monsanto related to Roundup weedkillers.
The people claiming injuries are made up of agricultural labourers, lawn care workers, and gardeners who have developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma because of their high levels of exposure to glyphosate.
Monsanto continues to assert that Roundoff is safe for consumers.
EPA Mandated Review of Glyphosate Safety
In December 2016, the EPA constructed a panel to review the possible health effects of glyphosate.
The panel consisted of 15 outside experts, composed of:
Academics
Federal law scientists
Chemical industry consultants
The review was not a consequence of the lawsuits, but rather the EPA is required to review health-effects for every pesticide once every 15 years.
Glyphosate had not been reviewed since 1991.
At that time, the EPA determined that the herbicide did not pose a threat to consumers.
In a puzzling move, the December conference began with the Chief of the Office of Pesticides Programs, Jack Housenger, laying out an array of evidence – in the form of a 227-page issue paper –explaining why glyphosate is an unlikely carcinogen.
Housenger then requested the panel review the analysis.
More than half of the expert panelists were concerned with the EPA’s findings.
During the conference, panelist Eric Johnson, an epidemiologist at the University of Arkansas, expressed his concerns.
Johnson said that if any study suggested a positive connection between glyphosate and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, the EPA would quickly minimize the findings, citing alleged flaws in the study.
Panelist Lianne Sheppard, a biostatistician at the University of Washington-Seattle, explained that there was a “consensus” on the panel that “the available evidence did not fit with the conclusions drawn in the issue paper, particularly when put in the context of guidelines.”
Three of the experts even expressed concern regarding the Office of Pesticides Programs’ integrity and ability to conduct unbiased studies.
In 2016, approximately 30% of the Office of Pesticides Programs operating budget was funded by the pesticide manufacturing industry. The office relies on studies and tests conducted by the pesticide manufacturers for much of their data.
After the conference, the EPA publicly released the issue paper. By law, the EPA had to include any concerns expressed by the panelists.
Using ambiguous language and vague information, the EPA downplayed the severity of the panel’s concerns.
When a majority of the panelists disagreed with the EPA’s findings, the release paper would simply state “some panelists expressed doubt.”
If the panelists denied the data, the release would only explain that “panelists had some concerns.”
The issue paper did not distinguish how many or which panelists were concerned with which specific data sets.
Scientists Speak Out About Glyphosate Dangers
Following the conference, a group of environmental health scientists came together to voice their concerns in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
The researchers argued that more unbiased safety reviews of glyphosate are needed for market approval.
“It is incongruous that safety assessments of the most widely used herbicide on the planet rely largely on fewer than 300 unpublished, non-peer-reviewed studies while excluding the vast modern literature on glyphosate effects,” the study’s authors write.
On July 7, California was the first state to list glyphosate as a known carcinogen, contrasting the EPA’s federal approval of the herbicide.
Federal Ban of Glyphosate Remains Unlikely
The chances of a federal glyphosate ban are slim.
The 2016 election cycle brought a change in bureaucratic leadership, including a new EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt.
Pruitt previously served as Oklahoma’s Attorney General.
During his tenure as Attorney General, Pruitt sued the EPA on 13 separate occasions, all of which were attempts to end federal regulations on behalf of corporations.
Since taking over the EPA, Pruitt has already reversed a ban on chlorpyrifos, a pesticide similar to glyphosate, which is believed to cause brain damage in agricultural workers and children.
A national group of pediatricians said that they were “deeply alarmed by EPA’s decision not to finalize the proposed rule to end chlorpyrifos uses on food,” saying it puts children at significant risk.
Despite this, Pruitt took the side of chlorpyrifos manufacturer, DOW Chemical, arguing that the data did not directly link chlorpyrifos exposure to brain damage.
Pruitt is in a position now to decide whether to increase regulations on or completely ban glyphosate.
Based on Pruitt’s past history and aggressive attitude towards deregulation, it is unlikely that the new EPA administrator will go against corporate interest.
A lot rides on the EPA’s market approval of glyphosate.
Last September, Bayer AG agreed to buy Monsanto for $66 billion, pending regulatory approvals.
Since 2015, Monsanto has spent more than $10.3 million in lobbying, developing advantageous relationships with political heads and bureaucrats that control agricultural policies and regulations.
With political influence and financial power, as well as a new EPA head administrator favoring environmental deregulation, there is little to hinder Monsanto’s merger with Bayer AG.
The corporate giant will see to it that Roundup stays on the market, even if it is at the expense of the thousands of agricultural workers who are exposed to its dangerous product every day.
Roundup Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Cancer Patients
As research on the effects of glyphosate continues to indicate that the chemical is a carcinogen, more product liability Roundup lawsuit cases will be filed across federal and state courts.
Federal multidistrict litigation is proceeding under the direction of U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria.
During the first bellwether trial, Judge Chhabria made the following comment relating to Monsanto’s carelessness.
“Although the evidence that Roundup causes cancer is quite equivocal, there is strong evidence from which a jury could conclude that Monsanto does not particularly care whether its product is, in fact, giving people cancer, focusing instead on manipulating public opinion and undermining anyone who raises genuine and legitimate concerns about the issue,” Judge Chhabria said.
Who Can Participate in a Roundup Lawsuit?
Participation is not limited to just farmworkers.
Any individual who has been consistently exposed to Roundup weed killer may be eligible to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
If you have been exposed to Roundup weed killers and have developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, contact a knowledgeable Roundup injury lawyer to explore your options.
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for any potential Roundup lawsuit case.
Call today to speak to an experienced Roundup injury lawyer from our law firm.
TorHoerman Law: Your Roundup Lawyer
Our chemical exposure legal team is prepared to help you in filing a Roundup Lawsuit and securing compensation for the injuries you’ve suffered.
We have secured over $4 billion for people harmed at no fault of their own, and we aren’t afraid to take on large corporations for their negligence.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Roundup Lawsuit Update 2023 | Average Roundup Settlement Per Person
CLIENT REVIEWS
Tom Lewis
TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.
Jordan Terry
TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.
Dave Woodley
All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.
Jordan Butler
I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!
Maddy Moeller
Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!
Karen Hersman
A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!
Angel Truesdale
They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!
Paul Graegin
The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.
Chicago
Edwardsville
St. Louis
Other Illinois Locations
Other Missouri Locations
