If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
The Ozempic lawsuit centers on allegations that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about serious risks associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 medications.
Plaintiffs allege the drug has been linked to severe gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis, as well as vision loss and other complications that have disrupted patients’ health, nutrition, employment, and daily functioning.
If you or a loved one developed gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, severe vomiting, vision loss, or other serious complications after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication, you may have legal options.
Dupixent lawsuits allege that patients treated with dupilumab therapy later developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can closely resemble severe eczema.
Research and published case reports have raised questions about whether some patients with atopic dermatitis face a higher risk of developing CTCL compared to similar patients who did not receive the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn patients and physicians about the possibility that Dupixent could worsen, accelerate, or reveal previously undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
If you or a loved one has suffered a severe reaction or blood cancer linked to Dupixent, you may be eligible to take action and file a Dupixent lawsuit.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
Legal claims against manufacturers and distributors of generic Acetaminophen have been investigated on behalf of pregnant women who used Tylenol during pregnancy and children who developed disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, and more.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims allege that these devices are defectively designed and improperly marketed without adequate warnings, leading to severe injuries for patients.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving spinal cord stimulators that allegedly caused serious injury instead of the relief patients were led to expect.
If you or a loved one experienced complications following spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to pursue compensation through a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Roblox lawsuit claims center on allegations that the platform allowed predators to groom, exploit, and abuse children through unsafe design and inadequate protections.
TorHoerman Law is dedicated to helping families who believe their child was harmed on Roblox pursue justice and financial recovery.
For many families, legal action represents both a path to compensation and a way to demand systemic change in how Roblox treats the safety of its youngest players.
If your child was sexually abused, exploited, or exposed to harmful content through Roblox, you may be eligible to take legal action by filing a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Olympus Scope lawsuit claims center on allegations that certain reusable Olympus endoscopes and related accessories exposed patients to dangerous bacterial contamination after medical procedures.
These infections can lead to hospitalization, IV antibiotic treatment, sepsis, organ failure, and death, leaving many patients with serious medical complications and lasting physical harm.
You may qualify to file an Olympus scope lawsuit if you underwent an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure involving Olympus equipment and later developed a serious bacterial infection.
Families who lost a loved one after infection-related complications linked to an Olympus scope procedure may also be able to pursue a wrongful death claim.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Breast mesh lawsuits involve allegations that certain mesh products used during breast reconstruction, augmentation, and lift procedures contributed to postoperative complications and the need for revision surgeries.
Patients who experienced complications after mesh-assisted breast procedures have reported chronic pain, reconstruction problems, cosmetic deformities, and additional revision surgeries.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications after breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra technique, you may be eligible to pursue a breast mesh lawsuit claim for the harm caused.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit claims that defective implantable ports have caused patients to suffer dangerous fractures, blood clots, and infections due to the breakdown of the catheter’s material inside the body.
These failures can lead to life-threatening complications such as embolism, sepsis, or the need for surgical removal of the device.
If you or a loved one experienced severe complications such as blood clots, infections, or catheter fractures requiring surgery due to a defective AngioDynamics port catheter, you may be eligible to file an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit and seek compensation.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Nitrous oxide lawsuit claims center on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who profit from selling canisters that are widely misused as a recreational drug.
Reports link this misuse to severe neurological injuries, psychiatric symptoms, hypoxia, and deaths caused by accidents or overdose.
These cases are rapidly expanding as more evidence emerges of the profound physical, psychological, and social toll caused by nitrous oxide misuse.
If you or a loved one has suffered brain injuries, spinal cord or nerve damage, psychiatric symptoms, or even death linked to misused nitrous oxide, you may be eligible to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit claim and seek compensation for the harm caused.
Diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit claims center on allegations that repeated inhalation of butter-flavoring chemicals in certain workplaces, including diacetyl and related substitutes, caused permanent and preventable airway damage.
Popcorn lung, medically known as bronchiolitis obliterans or constrictive bronchiolitis, is a serious obstructive lung disease that scars and narrows the small airways, leaving many people with persistent shortness of breath, chronic cough, and reduced exercise tolerance.
TorHoerman Law has experience handling diacetyl popcorn lung cases and is currently reviewing claims from workers who believe occupational exposure to these flavoring chemicals contributed to their diagnosis.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with diacetyl induced lung disease or bronchiolitis obliterans, you may have grounds to pursue a diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit for the harm caused to your lung tissue and long-term lung function.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Defendants
Ethicon, Inc. / Johnson & Johnson
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Boston Scientific Corporation
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Coloplast Corporation
Cook Medical, Inc.
Neomedic
Injuries named in lawsuit
Mesh erosion or exposure
Chronic pelvic pain
Painful sexual intercourse
Infection
Bleeding or organ perforation
Urinary problems or incontinence
Bowel complications
Need for mesh removal or revision surgery
You may qualify to file a claim if...
You received transvaginal or pelvic mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), or another pelvic-floor condition.
You developed a serious complication such as mesh erosion, chronic pelvic pain, infection, organ perforation, urinary problems, or painful intercourse after implantation.
Your complications required significant medical treatment, mesh revision, partial or complete mesh removal, or another corrective procedure.
Most Recent Updates
The major federal transvaginal mesh MDLs have closed after resolving most claims, but individual lawsuits continue to be filed and litigated in state courts.
Although the large federal transvaginal mesh MDLs have largely concluded, significant pelvic mesh litigation continues in New Jersey state court.
The FDA continues to state that transvaginal mesh used to treat pelvic organ prolapse presents additional risks, and no FDA-approved mesh products for transvaginal POP repair are currently marketed in the United States.
Overview of the Vaginal Mesh Prolapse Lawsuit
On this page, we will discuss the vaginal mesh prolapse lawsuit, medical challenges associated with vaginal mesh prolapse, rising reports of injuries from surgical mesh devices, and much more.
Lawsuits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Other Vaginal Mesh Complications
The use of vaginal mesh in surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been a significant concern for years.
While intended to provide support and stability to weakened pelvic organs, transvaginal mesh implants have led to many serious complications, including vaginal mesh prolapse.
As victims continue to grapple with the physical and emotional toll of these complications, legal actions against surgical mesh manufacturers are on the rise.
Vaginal mesh prolapse is one of the most severe and distressing outcomes for patients.
As individuals experience the recurrence of prolapse despite undergoing mesh implantation, they face physical discomfort, emotional distress, and a diminished quality of life.
If you or a loved one has suffered from vaginal mesh prolapse following the implantation of transvaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation for your damages.
When it comes to pelvic or vaginal prolapse, mesh devices have revolutionized the treatment.
Vaginal mesh, also known as transvaginal or pelvic mesh, is a medical device designed to provide structural support to weakened or damaged pelvic organs.
These devices are typically made from synthetic materials such as polypropylene, a plastic commonly used in medical implants.
Some surgical mesh products have also used bioabsorbable materials like pig or cow tissue.
Originally, synthetic mesh implants were used in abdominal surgeries.
Doctors adopted the use of this device for transvaginal procedures as well, as they offered a minimally invasive alternative to the traditional surgical treatment.
Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) are a group of conditions that affect the pelvic floor, which is a sling-like structure that supports the bladder, urethra, intestines, uterus, vagina, rectum, and other pelvic organs.
These disorders usually occur as pelvic floor muscles and other connective tissues become weaker or damaged, causing pelvic organs to shift from their normal position.
Common pelvic floor disorders include:
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP): A condition in which one or more pelvic organs protrude into the vaginal wall
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI): Involuntary leakage of urine during physical activities that put pressure on the bladder
Fecal Incontinence (FI) or Bowel Control Problems: Inability to control the elimination of waste from the anus
Overactive Bladder (OAB): Sudden, strong urges to urinate or urinary frequency
Chronic Pelvic Pain: Persistent and debilitating pain in the pelvic region
Known risk factors for developing pelvic floor disorders include:
Age: As the pelvic floor muscles naturally weaken, older adults are more susceptible to pelvic floor disorders.
Vaginal Birth: The physical strain of childbirth can cause damage to pelvic floor muscles. Multiple pregnancies and deliveries can increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse.
Instrumental Vaginal Birth: The use of forceps or vacuum extraction during childbirth can also lead to pelvic floor damage. Fecal incontinence is a common complication of instrumental deliveries.
Menopause: The decline in estrogen levels during menopause can weaken pelvic floor muscles, leading to stress urinary incontinence and other disorders.
Gastrointestinal Disease: Conditions such as constipation, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can put pressure on the pelvic floor and contribute to disorders.
Mesh manufacturers marketed vaginal mesh as a promising solution for pelvic floor disorders, primarily used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
As mentioned earlier, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs when one or multiple pelvic organs drop or bulge into the vaginal wall or canal.
This condition can happen due to weakened or damaged pelvic floor muscles and other connective tissues that typically support these organs.
There are different types of POP, depending on which organ is affected.
Different types of POP includes:
Cystocele or Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: The bladder drops against the vaginal wall.
Rectocele or Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: The rectum bulges into the back wall of the vagina
Enterocele: The small intestine drops and pushes into the top or back wall of the vagina.
Urethrocele: The urethra sinks into the front vaginal wall.
Uterine Prolapse: The uterus drops down into the vaginal canal.
Vaginal Vault Prolapse: The vaginal vault, or the upper portion of the vagina, sags into the vaginal canal.
Medical providers used vaginal mesh for POP repair to provide additional support to the weakened pelvic floor.
Complications, such as vaginal mesh erosion and recurrence of prolapse, have been reported in many cases.
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a type of urinary incontinence where patients experience leakage of small amounts of urine or complete loss of bladder control.
It typically occurs when physical activities put pressure on the bladder.
These activities include:
Coughing
Sneezing
Laughing
Exercising
Bending over
Lifting heavy objects
Having sexual intercourse
SUI can happen when the sphincter, the muscle constricting the bladder’s opening, weakens or becomes damaged.
It can also occur due to sagging pelvic organs or damage to nerves controlling the sphincter.
Vaginal mesh provides additional support to the urethra and sphincter, reducing SUI symptoms.
Complications such as vaginal mesh exposure and erosion, nerve damage, and recurrence of incontinence became prevalent in patients who underwent mesh surgery.
Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Female pelvic reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) is a medical procedure used to treat pelvic floor disorders.
The goal of the surgery is to restore normal positioning of the pelvic organs and improve bladder control.
These procedures were traditionally performed through open surgery, which involves making large incisions in the abdomen or vaginal wall.
Since female pelvic reconstructive surgery can be an invasive procedure, doctors initially believed that using a transvaginal mesh implant may reduce surgical complications and improve outcomes.
Through transvaginal mesh surgery, a significantly less invasive method, doctors inserted mesh through the vagina to support the pelvic organs and repair damage to the pelvic floor.
Many women experienced serious complications after undergoing transvaginal mesh surgery, leading to numerous transvaginal mesh lawsuits against manufacturers.
Vaginal mesh prolapse was one of the most common complications, where the synthetic mesh causes pelvic organ prolapse to recur.
Vaginal mesh prolapse refers to the displacement or protrusion of the transvaginal mesh implant from its intended position, leading to the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse.
This condition is ironic, as the original purpose of using mesh was to provide additional support and treat pelvic organ prolapse.
The mesh is designed to provide additional support and strengthen the pelvic floor, but it can worsen POP symptoms if complications occur.
Complications can include:
Vaginal Mesh Erosion: The transvaginal mesh can move out of place or erode through the vaginal wall, causing pain, discomfort, and infection.
Vaginal Mesh Exposure: The transvaginal mesh can protrude through the vaginal wall and become exposed, leading to pain, bleeding, and increased risk of infection.
Vaginal Mesh Migration: In some cases, the transvaginal mesh can move from its intended position, causing discomfort and pain.
Vaginal Mesh Failure: The transvaginal mesh can fail to provide the necessary support, causing recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
Vaginal Mesh Contraction: The transvaginal mesh can shrink or contract over time, leading to pain and discomfort in the pelvic area.
When vaginal mesh prolapse occurs, patients may experience a variety of symptoms such as:
Pelvic pressure
Pain or discomfort in the pelvic area
Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs)
Urinary incontinence
Difficulty urinating or defecating
Painful intercourse
Aside from recurrent prolapse, vaginal mesh can also cause the following complications:
Nerve Damage: The transvaginal mesh can damage nerves in the pelvic area, leading to chronic pain and nerve dysfunction.
Vaginal Bleeding: The transvaginal mesh can cause irritation and damage to surrounding tissues, leading to vaginal bleeding.
Vaginal Scarring: The transvaginal mesh can cause scarring in the vaginal wall, leading to pain and discomfort.
Fistula Formation: In some cases, the transvaginal mesh can create an opening between the vagina and other organs, such as the bladder or rectum, causing discomfort and increasing the risk of infection.
Infection: The transvaginal mesh can increase the risk of contamination in the pelvic area due to irritation and damage to surrounding tissues.
Tissue and Organ Perforation: The transvaginal mesh can puncture or damage surrounding tissues and organs, leading to serious health complications.
Surgical mesh removal may be necessary in severe cases to alleviate symptoms and prevent further damage.
Affected patients must seek medical attention if they experience any symptoms or complications following transvaginal mesh surgery.
The journey of a patient dealing with vaginal mesh prolapse often comes with unimaginable challenges.
Despite undergoing corrective surgeries to remove or revise the transvaginal mesh, some victims continue to experience recurrent prolapse.
Medical Challenges Associated With Vaginal Mesh Prolapse
Treating vaginal mesh prolapse poses significant medical challenges.
Surgical removal or revision of the mesh may be necessary to alleviate symptoms and restore pelvic organ support.
However, these procedures can be complex and carry their own set of risks, including injury to surrounding tissues, nerve damage, and the potential for further complications.
Multiple revision surgeries may sometimes be necessary to address the issue entirely.
Emotional and Psychological Challenges
Even after undergoing mesh removal, some patients may experience recurrent prolapse, indicating the profound impact of this condition on long-term health outcomes.
Aside from the physical challenges of treating vaginal mesh prolapse, victims also face emotional and psychological struggles.
Dealing with chronic pain, recurrent infections, and the fear of facing additional medical procedures can take a toll on a person’s mental health, affecting their self-esteem, intimate relationships, and overall quality of life.
Many women have reported feeling isolated, depressed, and anxious after experiencing complications from transvaginal mesh surgery.
Financial Challenges
Victims may also face financial problems due to the cost of medical procedures, ongoing treatment, and time off work for recovery.
In some cases, victims may have to leave their jobs entirely due to the severity of their condition, leading to financial strain and added stress.
The staggering medical expenses put a strain on their personal relationships and cause significant stress and anxiety.
Because of these challenges, many victims have turned to legal action by filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits against manufacturers for the harm caused.
These lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages related to vaginal mesh prolapse complications.
Several transvaginal mesh manufacturers have faced legal action from affected individuals for defective products.
Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers knew about the risks associated with transvaginal mesh but did not adequately warn patients and physicians.
They claim that manufacturers used aggressive marketing tactics, downplaying the potential complications and promoting the mesh as a safe and effective treatment.
They also highlight the 501(k) clearance process, which allows manufacturers to introduce new medical devices without conducting extensive clinical trials.
The considerable number of lawsuits has prompted the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate over 100,000 cases into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.
Plaintiffs named seven major manufacturers in the litigation, including:
Boston Scientific Corp.
C.R. Bard, Inc.
American Medical Systems (AMS)
Ethicon, Inc. (a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary)
Cook Medical Inc.
Coloplast Corp.
Neomedic
District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin presided over the MDL, which allowed for more efficient handling of pretrial proceedings and avoided inconsistent rulings across different courts.
He closed the MDL in November 2022 after most cases reached settlement agreements or went to trial.
He returned the remanded cases to their respective courts for individual resolution.
Vaginal mesh prolapse is a severe complication that can have profound consequences for affected individuals.
Affected individuals must seek legal guidance from experienced vaginal mesh lawyers who understand the complexities of these cases.
At TorHoerman Law, we are committed to advocating for individuals who have been harmed by defective medical devices, including vaginal mesh implants.
Our skilled attorneys have a proven track record of success in handling complex medical-legal cases, and we are dedicated to helping our clients pursue the justice and compensation they deserve.
We offer compassionate support, personalized attention, and unwavering advocacy every step of the way.
If you wish to pursue a vaginal mesh lawsuit, we can help.
If you or someone you know has suffered harm due to vaginal mesh prolapse or other vaginal mesh complications, don’t hesitate to reach out to TorHoerman Law for a confidential consultation.
Together, we can navigate the complexities of your case and work toward securing the justice and compensation you deserve.
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case review.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the transvaginal mesh lawsuit instantly.
A vaginal mesh prolapse lawsuit is a legal claim filed by women who have suffered complications from surgical mesh devices used in pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence surgeries.
These lawsuits often claim that the mesh devices, such as transvaginal mesh or pelvic slings, have caused serious health issues like pelvic pain, mesh erosion, and organ damage.
Plaintiffs in these cases typically seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other losses due to the defective nature of the mesh.
Common complications from vaginal mesh implants include vaginal scarring, mesh erosion into surrounding tissues, intense pelvic pain, and urinary problems.
These issues can severely impact a woman’s quality of life, requiring additional surgeries like mesh removal or repair.
The FDA has issued warnings about these risks, emphasizing the serious nature of the complications that can arise from transvaginal mesh implants.
Patients considering surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse should be aware of the significant risks associated with vaginal mesh products.
These include potential for mesh erosion, infection, pelvic pain, and the need for additional surgeries.
It is crucial for patients to discuss all surgical options with their healthcare providers, including the benefits and risks of using synthetic mesh versus native tissue repair techniques.
In 2023, the legal landscape for vaginal mesh prolapse claims has seen significant developments, including new multidistrict litigation cases and increased settlement offers from manufacturers.
Courts have increasingly recognized the severity of the injuries caused by these devices, leading to larger jury awards and settlements.
Ongoing clinical trials and medical studies continue to influence the outcomes of these cases, as new evidence comes to light regarding the safety and efficacy of vaginal mesh implants.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
Legally Reviewed
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
Fact-Checked
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
Additional Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit resources on our website:
You received transvaginal or pelvic mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), or another pelvic-floor condition.
You developed a serious complication such as mesh erosion, chronic pelvic pain, infection, organ perforation, urinary problems, or painful intercourse after implantation.
Your complications required significant medical treatment, mesh revision, partial or complete mesh removal, or another corrective procedure.
Most Recent Updates
The major federal transvaginal mesh MDLs have closed after resolving most claims, but individual lawsuits continue to be filed and litigated in state courts.
Although the large federal transvaginal mesh MDLs have largely concluded, significant pelvic mesh litigation continues in New Jersey state court.
The FDA continues to state that transvaginal mesh used to treat pelvic organ prolapse presents additional risks, and no FDA-approved mesh products for transvaginal POP repair are currently marketed in the United States.
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.