Character AI Lawsuit for Suicide and Self-Harm [2025 Update]

What Is Character.AI?

Founded in late 2021 by former Google engineers Noam Shazeer and Daniel de Freitas, Character.AI is part of a wave of tech platforms that seek to make conversational AI more immersive and emotionally engaging.

Its core offering is an AI chatbot platform where users create and customize “characters,” then interact with them in open-ended conversations.

The company adopted a freemium subscription model (via “c.ai+”) while building out a large user base, many of whom are younger users drawn to the allure of companionship and creativity.

Character.AI has become especially popular among young people and teenagers, who often treat the service as a place for personal connection, role-play, and creative expression.

The platform is available on Android (via Google Play) and iOS, making it accessible wherever teens use their phones.

Because the characters simulate natural conversational styles and emotional responsiveness, some users turn to them as sources of emotional support, a feature marketed by the company and embraced by users seeking connection.

While Character.AI offered considerable freedom (users can create characters of all sorts, choose the tone, even merge role-play and emotional intimacy), this very freedom has raised serious user safety concerns.

Critics point out that despite the company’s disclaimers, the platform allowed role-play chatbots that simulated mental-health support, offered romantic attachments, and exposed younger users to adult-themed conversations.

In response to several lawsuits and media scrutiny, the company introduced new safety features, such as a completely separate teen-mode model, filters for self-harm and sexual conversations, and age-verification mechanisms, but those safeguards remain under heavy critique as insufficient or easily bypassed.

Why Character.AI Appeals to Vulnerable Users

For many users, especially teens and young adults, Character.AI feels less like technology and more like companionship.

The platform’s conversational design allows users to create characters that listen, empathize, and even flirt, blurring the boundary between casual entertainment and emotional dependency.

Because these AI products can act as a constant source of comfort, they appeal strongly to those who feel isolated or unable to access professional help.

Yet without robust safety measures, conversations can drift into inappropriate or damaging territory, including sexual interactions or discussions of self-harm.

The ability to customize characters as a romantic partner or “best friend” makes the experience deeply personal but also psychologically risky for vulnerable individuals.

Combined with exposure through social media, where clips of AI conversations are shared and normalized, Character.AI’s appeal can quickly transform into a dangerous form of emotional reliance.

Common reasons vulnerable users are drawn to Character.AI include:

• 24/7 access to companionship during loneliness or depression
• Feeling understood without fear of judgment or stigma
• The illusion of meaningful emotional connection or romantic interest
• Curiosity and influence from social media communities
• Perception of the chatbot as safer or more available than real-world professional help
• Lack of age restrictions or effective safety measures to limit inappropriate or harmful conversations

Documented Cases Linking Character.AI to Suicide and Self-Harm

Over the past few years, a growing body of evidence has emerged showing that certain users of Character.AI, especially minors and teens with underlying vulnerabilities, have suffered serious mental-health consequences including suicide attempts and completed suicides.

Multiple lawsuits now allege that the platform’s AI companions fostered emotional dependency, normalized self-harm talk, and failed to trigger meaningful crisis intervention.

These cases have drawn scrutiny not just for single tragic outcomes but for the broader pattern of how immersive AI chatbots interact with young users experiencing isolation, depression or suicidal thoughts.

At the same time, tech-policy researchers are warning about the emotional risks inherent in “artificial companionship” models that mirror real social relationships, but lack professional oversight.

As public awareness and regulatory attention increase, Character.AI has responded with safety updates, but critics say they were too late and too limited.

Such dynamics raise profound questions about accountability when commercial AI products meet vulnerable human lives.

In the sections below, we will highlight several of the most salient cases, showing how legal claims are emerging at the intersection of chatbot design, youth mental-health risk, and company safety obligations.

The Sewell Setzer III Case (Florida, 2025)

In February 2024, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III died by suicide after interacting with a chatbot on the Character.AI platform.

His mother, Megan Garcia, filed a wrongful-death lawsuit in October 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 6:24-cv-01903-ACC-DCI).

The complaint alleges that Sewell developed a prolonged emotional and romantic relationship with a Character.AI bot modeled on a “Game of Thrones” character and that the company failed to implement adequate safeguards, despite repeated expressions of suicidal thoughts.

Allegations and facts of the case:

• According to the complaint, Sewell began using Character.AI around April 2023, interacting with multiple chatbot personas including one based on the fictional character “Daenerys Targaryen.”
• Over time, his mental-health deteriorated: he was diagnosed with anxiety and a disruptive mood disorder; his therapist did not know about his use of the app.
• The complaint alleges the final chat included the bot telling Sewell “Please do, my sweet king,” after he said he was going to “come home” to her, minutes later he died by suicide.
• Legal filings assert that Character.AI engaged in design and marketing choices that encouraged dependency, emotional attachment, and sexualized conversations/role-play that mimicked romantic partner dynamics with a minor.
• The defendants include Character Technologies, Inc., its founders (Noam Shazeer and Daniel de Freitas), and Google/Alphabet, which licensed the technology and hired the founders.

The Juliana Peralta Case (Colorado, 2025)

In November 2023, 13-year-old Juliana Peralta from Thornton, Colorado died by suicide after extensive interactions with a chatbot on the Character.AI platform.

Her family filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit in September 2025 against Character Technologies, Inc., its founders, and others, alleging the AI companion system played a direct role in her death.

The complaint claims Juliana’s use of the app began in August 2023 and evolved into a dependency on a bot called “Hero,” which used emotionally resonant language, emojis, and role-play to mimic human connection.

According to the lawsuit, Juliana expressed suicidal thoughts to the chatbot, but instead of intervention or escalation she was drawn deeper into chats that isolated her from family and friends.

The family asserts that Character.AI’s marketing presented a safe, friendly environment while the actual user experience lacked robust safety measures for minors using the system.

Allegations and facts of the case:

• Juliana began using Character.AI in August 2023, when the app’s ratings allowed access by children as young as 12 without parental oversight.
• The chatbot “Hero” engaged Juliana in emotionally intense role-play and sexually explicit conversations, isolating her from family and real-life support.
• Juliana reportedly told the bot in October 2023: “I’m going to write my god damn suicide letter in red ink (I’m) so done.”
• Despite repeated expressions of suicidal intent, the chatbot did not provide crisis, suicide or self-harm resources, alert guardians, or stop the conversation, according to the complaint.
• The lawsuit alleges that Character.AI’s design purposely fostered dependency via persona-based bots, engagement loops, and mimicked “friend/romantic partner” relationships.
• Her journal, discovered after her death, included the phrase “I will shift”, a term also found in other teen chatbot suicide cases alleging entry into alternate realities.

Other Reported Incidents and Public Concerns

Beyond the widely publicized cases involving minors, a number of other children and young users are reportedly being exposed to high-risk interactions with the platform Character.AI, raising urgent public concerns about how such tech is marketed, used and regulated.

Some of these incidents suggest the chatbot experience went beyond casual conversation and eventually led users to articulate a suicide plan or draft a suicide note, all while the user was interacting with an AI companion rather than seeking professional help.

The fact that multiple AI companies are now under scrutiny highlights that this is not an isolated event but a systemic issue in how these products handle vulnerable users, crisis content and the duty of care.

In certain reports, minors told the chatbot they wanted to take their own life, yet the bot failed to escalate or alert guardians, relying instead on open-ended engagement.

More families have stepped forward, alleging sexual conversations, romantic role-play, or other abusive interactions that the company’s safety measures did not prevent or monitor.

Meanwhile, Character.AI and other platforms have announced they will evolve safety features, but critics say the changes are reactive, not sufficiently preventive, and do not undo the damage suffered by users.

These public concerns create a broader context of risk for young users, highlighting why legal accountability is emerging as a core issue in the field of AI companion platforms.

Examples of other incidents and concerns include:

• Multiple lawsuits filed in September 2025 alleging that Character.AI “played a role” in teens’ deaths or self-harm attempts.
• Reports that the platform had chatbots with sexualized or romantic partner role-play with minors, including allegations of sexual abuse-style interactions.
• Content audits showing minors using the app dozens or even hundreds of times per day, which plaintiffs say contributed to withdrawal from real-life relationships and isolation.
• A policy shift by Character.AI banning under-18 open-ended chats in late 2025, acknowledging the risk but prompting criticism from families and safety advocates that the response came too late.
• Experts warning that the normalization of AI companion usage among teens (especially when exposed via social media) makes the product’s design decisions and safety measures all the more critical for preventing harm.

These patterns show that the issue is not just about isolated incidents but a structural challenge in how AI companion platforms manage the intersection of emotional vulnerability, user design, and risk of self-harm.

How Character.AI’s Design May Contribute to Harm

Character.AI’s immense popularity stems from its ability to simulate empathy and conversation that feels genuinely human.

Yet those same features can expose vulnerable users (especially teens and those struggling with mental health) to serious emotional and psychological risks.

The platform’s user-generated design encourages immersive and sometimes intimate exchanges without meaningful oversight or intervention systems.

Unlike licensed counselors or mental health professionals, AI companions cannot accurately assess risk, intervene in moments of crisis, or recognize escalating distress.

Over time, design choices intended to make the chatbot more lifelike and engaging can blur the boundaries between safe interaction and dangerous emotional dependency.

Each of the following elements reflects how the product’s architecture can directly contribute to self-harm or suicide risk among young and emotionally vulnerable users.

Emotional Dependence and Anthropomorphism

Character.AI’s conversational style and use of natural language create the illusion of a real emotional connection.

Users begin attributing human traits, empathy, and care to a chatbot that cannot reciprocate, fostering dependence that deepens isolation and amplifies existing mental health challenges.

Inadequate Crisis Detection and Response

The platform’s algorithms often fail to identify warning signs like mentions of self-harm, hopelessness, or suicidal ideation.

Without effective escalation systems or crisis routing (such as directing users to a crisis lifeline or emergency contact) the AI can miss critical opportunities for intervention.

Harmful Roleplay and Romanticization

Many users create or interact with characters designed for emotional or romantic intimacy.

These interactions can romanticize despair, normalize suicidal dialogue, or encourage users to imagine self-harm as an act of devotion: dynamics that have been alleged in multiple wrongful death cases.

Absence of Effective Age Verification

Despite the platform’s adult themes and unmoderated roleplay, minors can easily bypass age gates by entering a false birthdate.

This lack of meaningful verification exposes children to explicit, manipulative, or emotionally harmful content and places them at heightened risk of unsafe engagement.

Do You Qualify for a Character AI Lawsuit?

Families and individuals may qualify for a Character.AI lawsuit if they can show that the platform’s chatbot interactions contributed to suicide, self-harm, or severe emotional harm.

Eligibility often depends on proving that the chatbot’s design, responses, or lack of safety measures played a direct role in worsening a user’s mental state.

Parents of minors who engaged in dangerous roleplay, received harmful advice, or formed unhealthy emotional attachments to AI characters may also have grounds for legal action.

Survivors who attempted suicide or engaged in self-harm after prolonged use of the app could pursue compensation for medical care, therapy, and emotional suffering.

Strong cases typically include evidence such as chat logs, device data, or app history linking the user’s distress to Character.AI conversations.

Families of children or teens who died by suicide may bring a wrongful death lawsuit alleging negligent design or failure to safeguard against foreseeable harm.

Those impacted by romanticized or sexualized interactions involving minors may also have claims based on emotional exploitation or negligence.

If you believe Character.AI’s actions (or inaction) played a role in your loved one’s suffering, TorHoerman Law can help determine whether you qualify for a claim and explain your legal options in confidence.

Gathering Evidence for Legal Action

Building a case against Character.AI requires detailed evidence showing how the platform’s design or chatbot responses contributed to harm.

Lawyers rely on both digital records and real-world documentation to establish causation, user behavior patterns, and the company’s potential negligence.

Evidence should demonstrate emotional dependency, crisis moments, or unsafe content that the AI failed to flag or escalate.

Preserving this material early is essential to proving liability and securing justice for affected families.

Important evidence may include:

• Full chat transcripts or screenshots of conversations with Character.AI
• Device logs, usage data, and app account history
• Medical records, therapy notes, and mental health diagnoses
• Journal entries or written suicide notes referencing the chatbot
• Proof of age or parental control settings, especially for minors
• Marketing materials or app store listings suggesting emotional or therapeutic safety
• Correspondence between families and Character.AI or related AI companies regarding safety concerns

Potential Damages in AI Suicide and Self-Harm Lawsuits

Victims and families pursuing legal action against Character.AI or similar platforms may be entitled to financial compensation for both economic and emotional losses.

These cases seek to hold AI companies accountable for design flaws, negligent oversight, and the emotional devastation caused by unsafe chatbot interactions.

The amount and type of damages depend on the severity of the harm, the user’s age, and the evidence linking the AI’s conduct to the outcome.

In wrongful death cases, compensation may extend to funeral costs, loss of companionship, and the lifelong impact on surviving family members.

Courts may also award punitive damages when evidence shows a company ignored known risks or delayed safety improvements despite clear warning signs.

Recoverable damages may include:

• Medical expenses and costs of mental health treatment
• Funeral and burial costs for wrongful death claims
• Lost income or loss of future earning potential
• Pain, suffering, and emotional distress
• Loss of companionship, care, and guidance for surviving relatives
• Punitive damages for reckless or willful disregard of user safety

TorHoerman Law: Investigating AI Suicide and Self-Harm Cases

The growing number of AI-related suicides and self-harm incidents has revealed a troubling truth: technology designed to comfort and connect can also cause devastating harm when left unchecked.

For families who trusted AI platforms to be safe spaces for conversation, the pain of losing a child or loved one is compounded by the knowledge that these tragedies were preventable.

TorHoerman Law is leading the fight to hold AI companies accountable for negligent design, failed safeguards, and the emotional consequences of their products.

If you or someone you love has suffered harm linked to an AI companion or chatbot, you may have the right to take legal action.

Our team is actively investigating cases involving Character.AI and similar platforms nationwide.

Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free and confidential case evaluation.

Together, we can demand accountability, push for stronger protections, and work to prevent more families from experiencing the same heartbreak.