St. Louis, MO
Home ► Defective Product Lawsuit and Product Liability Law ► 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Lawsuit | 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Lawyer
3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit Update: Former Army Sergeant Files 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit Claiming Permanent Hearing Damage
In January 2019, a former Army Sergeant who was deployed to Iraq between 2003 and 2004 as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom, claims his tinnitus, hearing loss, and loss of balance was caused by the defective earbuds. The lawsuit will likely spark conversation among other military members prompting more lawsuits to be filed.
If you or a loved one heroically served our country and suffered from tinnitus or hearing loss as a result of the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs, you may qualify for a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs lawsuit.
If you were previously or are currently a U.S. military servicemember who used standard-issue 3M Combat Arms earplugs, and you suffered a hearing related injury, you may qualify to participate in a 3M Combat Arms earplugs lawsuit. Contact TorHoerman Law today to speak with a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs lawyer to determine whether you qualify.
Between 2003 and 2013, 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs Version 2 was the exclusive product used by all branches of the United States military, including the Navy, Army, Marines, and Air Force, in numerous military conflicts. The 3M Arms Ear Plugs Version 2 was designed to protect against hearing loss from gunfire, explosions, bombings, and airfare.
Initially manufactured by Aero Technologies, but acquired by 3M in 2008, the dual-ended combat arms earbuds, which were intended to protect against hearing loss, were found to be defective. Instead of blocking soundwaves, the earbuds were too short for proper insertion in the ear canal, causing them to loosen in the ear and not properly protect our nation’s service members from potentially harmful sounds. Injuries as a result of the defective earbuds range from tinnitus (ringing or buzzing in the ears) to partial or total hearing loss.
If you suffer from tinnitus, hearing loss, partial or total hearing loss, you may qualify for a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs lawsuit.
In order to qualify to participate in a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit, you must meet the following:
In 2003, the government issued an RFP, or government contract proposal, to Aero Technologies in which the company falsely certified the Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 was up to the designated standards by confirming they had a certain noise reduction rating (NPR) and would protect military members from damaging sounds. Proper testing was careless and negligent, yet the company confirmed to the government the earbuds tested at the required 22 NPR rate when in reality, the earbuds tested at an average rate of about 10.9 NPR, a vast difference. During testing, results showed the earbuds, in fact, were not as effective as intended, not only because of the lower NPR rate but also because of a design defect which caused them to loosen in the ear canal as a result of the earbud itself being too short to be properly inserted into the ear canal. According to a lawsuit filed by the US Department of Justice, 3M has known since as early as 2000 that the 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs were defective. After acquiring Aero, 3M hired Aero employees, including developers, who were aware of the product defect through pre-market testing in 2000.
Aero Technologies and its predecessor 3M failed to acknowledge the design defects to the United States government and military members.
The defective earbuds were standard issue to all military personnel during the following military conflicts:
The earbuds were designed as an inverted cone shape to be used in two different ways. One allows the individual to insert one side of the earbuds into the ear canal that would still allow for some hearing, such as when needing to listen to a conversation, but more muted. The other end of the earbuds would provide more extensive noise protection, such as when around gunfire or airfare.
A major defect was not disclosed to the government. After providing the earbuds to servicemembers for years, the defect brought to light the significant hearing damage the earbuds could have caused to service members who used them. Rather than being a hearing protector, a lack of proper insertion into the user’s ears caused irreparable hearing disabilities and loss.
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, veterans who served overseas, specifically during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom between September 2001 and March 2010, were four times more likely to suffer from significant hearing loss than non-veterans.
According to the comprehensive 2017 Annual Benefits Report published by the Veterans Benefits Administration, auditory disabilities were the number two cause of treatment between 2013 and 2017. In 2017, 3,101,223 men and women were treated for auditory disabilities. Tinnitus and hearing loss are the top two service-connected disabilities treated by the Veteran’s Administration. Tinnitus accounts for 7.7%, or 1,786,980 and hearing loss accounts for 5.0% or 1,157,585 of all disabilities. However, the number of affected individuals may be higher because many do not report their injuries or seek treatment.
Proper protection for soldiers is vital when faced with life or death situations while protecting our country. For companies that do business with the government, all should be providing properly made safety equipment for military members.
Tinnitus is a ringing or buzzing in the years. While not considered a medical condition, it is an underlying cause of medical issues such as an ear injury or Auditory processing disorder (APD). For military members who used the 3M Combat Arms Earbuds Version 2, tinnitus could be a result of permanent hearing damage from not being properly protected when around deafening noises while deployed during the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars.
If you believe you are suffering from tinnitus, hearing loss, or Auditory processing disorder (APD), contact a medical professional to diagnose your injuries.
Yes. Among the other hearing-related injuries associated with the 3M earplug, tinnitus is one of the injuries caused by the 3M earplug defect. If you developed tinnitus during your time in the service, it could be the fault of 3M’s defective product. You likely qualify to participate in the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs lawsuit.
According to the ADA, hearing loss is considered a disability and individuals that suffer from permanent hearing loss can qualify for disability. Whether you qualify for disability due to hearing loss depends on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the type of hearing loss, the severity of hearing loss, and whether the hearing loss is permanent. The ADA offers a comprehensive hearing loss guideline to help determine your rights and whether you qualify as disabled.
TorHoerman Law is proud to help our brave servicemen and women. Our firm is currently filing a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit on behalf of servicemen and women who unfortunately suffered serious ear injuries during military combat as the result of 3M’s negligence and greed.
The VA recently reported that more than 2.6 million veterans are currently receiving disability compensation for tinnitus, partial or total hearing loss.
If you are currently are or were serving in the US military and served at any point in time between 2003 to 2015, and you suffer from tinnitus, partial or total hearing, you may be eligible to participate in a 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs lawsuit.
Call 1-888-508-6752 to talk with an attorney at TorHoerman Law today. You fought for us, now let us fight for you.
The first and one of the most important steps is to mitigate your injuries by seeking medical treatment and diagnosis right away. Be sure to begin collecting all military service records and medical records as soon as possible – gathering evidence for your lawsuit is an important step in the process. Once you have begun to gather evidence, it is time to begin seeking legal aid. Hiring a personal injury attorney can greatly increase your chances of a successful 3M Combat Arms Earplugs lawsuit. You should also familiarize yourself with the steps in the civil litigation process, to have a better understanding of your role and your attorney’s duties. Because statutes of limitations bar you from taking legal action after an allotted time, you should not hesitate to seek legal aid.
Once you provide more detail about your case, your attorney will be able to determine what personal injury damages you qualify for – you may choose to file for both compensatory damages and punitive damages.
3M Earplug lawsuit settlements differ from case to case and depend heavily on the specifics surrounding each servicemember’s injuries. Based on the 3M Combat Arms earplugs lawsuit settlements that have been disclosed so far, servicemembers who have suffered partial hearing loss have received settlements ranging from $50,000 to $300,000. At this time, there is not enough public information available to determine the settlement range for more serious permanent hearing loss.
In the summer of 2018, 3M agreed to pay $9.1 million to the U.S. government to resolve allegations that it willingly and knowingly sold defective earbuds to the Defense Logistics Agency.
The whistleblower, Moldex-Metric, Inc., alleged that 3M and its predecessor Aearo Technologies knew about the defect since 2000 but withheld the information, even after becoming the sole provider of earplugs to thousands of servicemen and women, from the government.
According to a press release from Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad Readler of the Justice Department's Civil Division, the allegations were brought against 3M through the False Claims Act. Established during the Civil War, the False Claims Act is a federal statute that allows for criminal and civil penalties for "falsely billing the government, over-representing the amount of a delivered product, or under-stating an obligation to the government."
"In addition to damages directly associated with the contractual cost of the earplugs," the complaint stated, "The United States has been damaged by the large and ongoing medical costs associated with treating veterans who likely suffered hearing damage and impairment as a result of the defective earplugs."
As part of the settlement, Moldex-Metrix, Inc., received $1.9 million.
“Annual Benefits Report Veterans Benefits Administration Fiscal Year 2017.” Veterans Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2017, www.benefits.va.gov/REPORTS/abr/docs/2017_abr.pdf.
Axt, Bill. “3M Company to Pay $9.1 Million Settlement for Selling Defective Earplugs to Military.” The Hearing Shop, 14 Aug. 2018, thehearingshop.com/3m-company-pay-9-1-million-settlement-selling-defective-earplugs-military/.
Carlson, Mr. David. “False Claims Act.” LII / Legal Information Institute, Legal Information Institute, 21 Apr. 2015, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/false_claims_act.
Marshall, Josh. “Combat Veteran Files Lawsuit for Loss of Hearing Due to Defective Military Ear Plugs.” KHOU, KHOU, 22 Jan. 2019, www.khou.com/article/news/local/combat-veteran-files-lawsuit-for-loss-of-hearing-due-to-defective-military-ear-plugs/285-51892502-058e-4944-8cb3-274fd350d8e7.
Rempfer, Kyle. “Company to Pay $9 Million after Allegedly Selling Defective Combat Earplugs to US Military.” Military Times, Military Times, 26 July 2018, www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/07/26/company-to-pay-9-million-after-allegedly-selling-defective-combat-earplugs-to-us-military/.
“Severe Hearing Impairment Among Military Veterans --- United States, 2010.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 22 July 2011, www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6028a4.htm.
Last Modified: December 30th, 2019 @ 03:18 pm
© 2019 TorHoerman Law LLC.
The contents of this webpage have been prepared by TorHoerman Law, LLC for informational purposes only. None of this information is intended as either legal or medical advice or opinions. No attorney/client relationship is established with use of this website. Sending or receiving information through this site, posting to our blogs/news site does not establish an attorney/client relationship. An attorney/client relationship with TorHoerman Law is established only by an express and written agreement by TorHoerman Law to represent you. Our attorneys make a case-by-case assessment of any claims and results may vary depending on the facts concerning any case. The attorneys at TorHoerman Law are licensed to practice in Illinois, Missouri, and California. In some circumstances, cases may be sent to other qualified lawyers. In those circumstances, TorHoerman Law maintains joint responsibility.