St. Louis, MO
Home ► Blog ► What Exactly is a Bellwether Trial? A Plaintiff Perspective
A bellwether trial is a small consolidation of lawsuits, taken from a larger group of similar cases, to be tried first. The bellwether trial is like a practice run to help anticipate the results of the future similar cases.
Bellwether trials are often used in multidistrict litigations (MDL). An MDL is a federal legal procedure that helps fast-track civil lawsuits that have common “question of facts” that are pending in different federal district courts. The cases are fast-tracked by transferring and consolidating them for pretrial proceedings before a judge.
It would not be feasible to address the large number of sprawling lawsuits involved in an MDL so to better-manage the MDL, a bellwether trial, a smaller consolidation of these cases, is tried in front of the judge. If the outcome of these beginning cases goes well for the plaintiffs, the MDL’s lead attorneys can expect similar results and start to try the remaining suits.
An unsuccessful bellwether trial result might indicate to the lead attorneys that trying the remaining cases would be a waste of time and money. A bad bellwether result might also help the lead attorneys restructure the remaining cases so they might have more success in front of the judge.
Bellwether trials offer the unique opportunity for plaintiffs to test the structure of their case and see how the judge or jury perceive the argument. If the initial arguments have mixed success, the lead attorneys can try to restructure the argument in hopes of stronger results for the broader range of cases involved in the MDL.
The cases selected for a bellwether trial are meant to represent the broader range of cases involved in the MDL. The results of the bellwether trial are in no way definitive of other cases tried from the MDL. Rather, the bellwether trial results are just expectation indicators.
Successful bellwether trials can also be advantageous by influencing the defense to settle the remaining cases. If the bellwether plaintiffs are awarded a large verdict, the defense is more likely to be inclined to settle the remaining cases out-of-court, cutting the legal fees and making payouts larger for the plaintiffs.
[…] and California, against the manufacturer of Invokana. Cases have been filed in Canada, as well. The bellwether trials are expected to begin in September of […]
Posted by Invokana Risks Push Doctors to Switch Patients to Other Medications on Tue Sep 5 2017 5:08pm
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
« Read more related news
Contact us by phone at 1-888-508-6752 or email us below.
© 2019 TorHoerman Law LLC.
The contents of this webpage have been prepared by TorHoerman Law, LLC for informational purposes only. None of this information is intended as either legal or medical advice or opinions. No attorney/client relationship is established with use of this website. Sending or receiving information through this site, posting to our blogs/news site does not establish an attorney/client relationship. An attorney/client relationship with TorHoerman Law is established only by an express and written agreement by TorHoerman Law to represent you. Our attorneys make a case-by-case assessment of any claims and results may vary depending on the facts concerning any case. The attorneys at TorHoerman Law are licensed to practice in Illinois, Missouri, and California. In some circumstances, cases may be sent to other qualified lawyers. In those circumstances, TorHoerman Law maintains joint responsibility.
Wesite Design & Development by Kaizen Coding