St. Louis, MO
Home ► Blog ► Civil Lawsuit – The Civil Litigation Process Explained In Steps
A civil lawsuit can seem complex and, for most of us, confusing. If you are involved in a civil lawsuit, you shouldn’t feel discouraged by the various steps or the legal jargon. Civil lawsuits aren’t actually too hard to wrap your head around once you understand the steps and some of the terminology.
We broke down the basic steps of the civil lawsuit process to help our clients better understand what exactly is going on with their lawsuit.
A civil lawsuit, which is sometimes also called civil litigation, is a lawsuit based on non-criminal statutes, meaning it is a separate entity from a criminal proceeding. A civil lawsuit is a dispute that is handled legally by the courts, such as a personal injury lawsuit. Civil lawsuits commonly involve individuals, groups of people, people and businesses, or other entities.
A civil lawsuit can range from a small claim, such as a fender bender, to major multidistrict litigation involving thousands of individuals.
Civil litigation goes through specific steps – or proceedings. First and foremost, you should consult with potential representatives for legal advice. Before anything else, it is important that you consult with a personal injury attorney about your potential personal injury lawsuit. You need to be sure that you have a valid case so that you do not waste your own time and resources filing a case that is unlikely to be successful or a case that is unlikely to make it to trial. An experienced civil lawyer will help you to determine the strength of your case.
You should also be sure that your case falls within the state’s statute of limitations. Ask a legal representative to be sure that you are filing the case within the appropriate time frame.
Consultations are confidential, so don’t withhold information about your case from an attorney. It is best to share all the information that you have about your case during a consultation because it gives your potential attorney a better understanding of the case. An open and honest consultation will give you the most accurate prediction of the outcome of your case.
After an initial consultation, your civil lawsuit case will follow four common steps
The pleadings are the initial step in the civil lawsuit. Each side, or party, will file paperwork, in the right court, to explain their side of the story. The person bringing on the lawsuit, or plaintiff, will file a complaint. The person being alleged of wrongdoing, or defendant, will file an answer.
Choosing an appropriate location for your lawsuit requires legal analyses and knowledge of the relevant rules for the courts in your area. This step should be taken with an attorney. You and your attorney must find a court that fits multiple criteria before filing your case. The court must have personal jurisdiction over the defendants involved, subject matter jurisdiction over your case-type, and it must be located in the appropriate venue.
If the case has to do with constitutional law, you will need to file the lawsuit with a federal court. If your lawsuit has to do with family law, you will need to file the case with a state or regional family court. If you are filing an appeal, you need to file with an appellate court. If the disputed amount is under a certain monetary figure, you would file in small claims court. etc.
After choosing the appropriate court for your case, your attorney will draft the complaint. Once the initial complaint is filed, the civil lawsuit is legally underway.
The complaint is a formal document filed by the plaintiff with the court. The plaintiff is also responsible for formally delivering the complaint to the defendant.
The complaint is just that – a complaint. It details the plaintiff’s description of the events that lead to the dispute, outlining the ways in which the defendant caused harm to the plaintiff. The complaint also establishes a legal basis for holding the defendant responsible for the defendant’s alleged actions. The complaint generally contains an explanation for why the court holds jurisdiction over the case as well.
The answer is just that – an answer. The answer is a response to the plaintiff’s complaint. The answer details the defendant’s description of the events that lead to the dispute, outlining any inaccuracies or falsehoods that they find in the complaint.
The defendant has a limited amount of time to file an answer.
The defendant can file a counter-claim if they so choose. The counter-claim(s) is an allegation(s) against the plaintiff, outlining the ways in which the plaintiff caused harm to the defendant. The counter-claim also establishes a legal basis for holding the plaintiff responsible for the plaintiff’s alleged actions.
The plaintiff will sometimes file a response to the answer or counter-claim in the form of a reply.
As a response to replies, or in the instance that one party requests clarification over legal theories or allegations in the other party’s pleadings, a complaint or answer may be amended.
A party can ask that a specific part of any pleadings also be dismissed by the court, in which cases, a pleading would also be amended.
After both parties have completed the pleadings process, both parties will enter discovery. Discovery is a process in which both parties begin to obtain information to help strengthen their arguments. The theory of broad rights of discovery is that both the plaintiff and defendant will enter the trial with as much information as possible to make their case. Discovery also keeps the parties from hiding information from one another.
Discovery is generally the longest part of the civil litigation process. Discovery begins after all pleadings have been filed and do not end until shortly before the trial.
Each party will obtain evidence through demands for production of documents, depositions of parties and witnesses, written interrogatories (questions and answers written under oath), written requests for admissions of fact, an examination of the scene, and the petitions and motions employed to enforce discovery rights.
Parties may also use expert witnesses to gain knowledge about the case during discovery. Expert witnesses are brought in to validate arguments and testify on behalf of a party’s claim.
Before the trial begins, either during the discovery process or shortly after, parties may use motions to ask the court to rule or act. The motion can be a request to amend or dismiss part of the case, question legal basis or languages used by the other party, or clarification of certain issues in the lawsuit.
After discovery has ended, if the dispute is not resolved out of court, the civil lawsuit will move to trial.
Before the trial begins, both parties will submit a brief to the judge. A brief is a document that outlines the party’s argument as well as any evidence that the party will present during the trial.
At the trial, both the plaintiff and the defense will present their arguments to either a judge or jury. Trials involving a judge and no jury are referred to as bench trials. If the trial is set to be decided by a jury, both parties help make juror selections through a pre-trial process of potential-juror interviews called a voir dire.
Once the trial begins, both parties present their opening statements. Opening statements are brief outlines of the parties’ arguments.
After opening statements are made, each party introduces its case. The plaintiff always presents its case first. The defense presents its case after. After the defense has presented its case, the plaintiff has one last opportunity to present additional evidence – known as rebuttal evidence.
Each party will present its cases using evidence, which can include documents, expert testimony, or exhibits that support its argument. Witnesses may be called to the stand for questioning. After a witness is examined by one party, the opposing party can choose to cross-examine the witness.
Once each party has had an opportunity to present its case, both will make a closing argument.
In a jury trial, after closing arguments, the judge instructs the jury on the legal basis that it should apply to the evidence. The jury deliberates for a period of time until a verdict is reached.
In a bench trial, the judge deliberates for a period of time until a decision or verdict is reached.
After the verdict is made, a party can choose to challenge the verdict. These challenges are more common during jury trials because errors and disregard of the law or legal definitions occur more often by juries. A party can file a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, asking for the judge to make a decision without consideration to the jury’s verdict. A party can also file a motion for a new trial.
If a party does not agree with the result of the trial, they can appeal the decision. If a decision is appealed, then the civil lawsuit is presented to an appellate court that reviews the previous proceedings of the lawsuit. Each party will submit a brief and a record of evidence from trial to the appellate court. The appellate court looks for any errors in legality made during the pre-trial or trial proceedings.
After reviewing the proceedings, the appellate court releases an opinion, which is the appellate court’s decision. The opinion can either affirm the verdict made by the trial court or find an error, in which case the appellate court may reverse the verdict or order a new trial be conducted by the trial court.
Learn More About the Lawsuit Process:
"Legal Dictionary - Law.com." Law.com Legal Dictionary, dictionary.law.com/.
Useful information .
Posted by Prabhakar on Mon Mar 11 2019 11:39am
is it normal procedure for a civil rights lawyer to have the client sign a hippa release to check for leins
Posted by unknown on Wed Jul 31 2019 6:04pm
Every state has specific laws and responsibilities regarding attorneys and their clients’ liens so “normal procedure” varies. Your question is unique in that you are asking with regards to a “civil rights lawyer.” However, in a personal injury case, it is not unusual for a lawyer to assist his client in determining outstanding medical liens.
Posted by Jordan Terry on Fri Aug 23 2019 10:30am
email@example.com I need to sue my old landlord
Posted by Jacqueline Smith on Tue Sep 10 2019 1:52pm
Jacqueline – You can feel free to reach us at our toll-free number 1-888-508-6752 any time. We offer free no-obligation case consultations to all potential clients. You can also use our “Kasey” bot at the bottom-right side of the homepage to begin filling out your information.
Posted by Jordan Terry on Wed Sep 11 2019 5:03pm
I need advice I had a construction company build a deck and do the electric work and it was very wrongly done ..the company provides is edition to refund my money i ahve recorded texts emails paperwork and clal for proof and they never came through and now won’t answer my calls or nothing
Posted by ANGELA J GIDDLEY on Fri Sep 27 2019 1:52pm
Angela, you can always reach out to us via phone 1-888-508-6752 to discuss the specifics of your incident, free of charge. Although our firm primarily handles personal injury litigation, we may be able to put you in contact with a trusted firm or attorney in your area who can help with this contract dispute.
Posted by Jordan Terry on Mon Sep 30 2019 3:28pm
Hi, We are using a litigation attorney to handle a civil case that involves shareholder oppression, which resulted in a lock out, and discontinuation of documented /filed agreement for equal compensation.
Initially, the attorney created and served a actionable complaint with a expectation for response by a certain date. Now, that date has passed months ago, he is engaging in phone calls with opposing counsel , charging us large sums of money, and discussing a buyout according to the agreement , ( which they violated to begin with, and will not abide by) with no valuation of the company pursuant to buy out according to agreement. Knowing that an evaluation could have taken place initially , and understanding OC wanting to delay, and being fully prepare to pay to file suite, ( document previously served) , why is our attorney involved in endless calls and thousands of dollars in billing, with no end in site? Months and months, no valuation, and the attorney is not responding to even provide us with what he believes the objectives and goals are, is he responding a request to.meet to discuss. We have filed legal Corp agreements for this Corp.
Posted by Greg Outman on Thu Oct 24 2019 11:27am
An ex friend borrowed 60000 from me an offered to pay me back 82500 in return for the favor. I was repayed 60.000 but they refused to pay the interest. They are the ones who came to me and asked to borrow money it was their terms. Do I have recourse
Posted by Rita on Wed Oct 30 2019 2:27pm
Rita – This really just comes down to whether you, as the lender, and your ex-friend, as the borrow, how a written contract for the arrangement. If you had a written contract that clearly established interest rates, there may be an opportunity for you to take legal recourse. If you did not have a written contract, it will be very difficult for you to take legal action.
Posted by Jordan Terry on Wed Oct 30 2019 3:19pm
I won a civil case judgement against a person that still owes me 511.00 and the court costs. He has still not paid me. I called the district magistrates office after the allotted time for him to make settle passed. I now have to go in for a second signature and take it to the county court house. For what? How am I ever going to get my settlement at this point.
Posted by Gregory Bryan on Fri Jan 3 2020 7:59am
Did the judge set a specific deadline for payment? If this deadline has passed and you still have not collected, you may need to take additional legal steps with the court in order to collect. You may want to talk to the attorney that represented you in your civil case about the possibility of wage garnishments or personal property collections.
Posted by Jordan Terry on Fri Jan 3 2020 3:15pm
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
« Read more related news
Contact us by phone at 1-888-508-6752 or email us below.
© 2019 TorHoerman Law LLC.
The contents of this webpage have been prepared by TorHoerman Law, LLC for informational purposes only. None of this information is intended as either legal or medical advice or opinions. No attorney/client relationship is established with use of this website. Sending or receiving information through this site, posting to our blogs/news site does not establish an attorney/client relationship. An attorney/client relationship with TorHoerman Law is established only by an express and written agreement by TorHoerman Law to represent you. Our attorneys make a case-by-case assessment of any claims and results may vary depending on the facts concerning any case. The attorneys at TorHoerman Law are licensed to practice in Illinois, Missouri, and California. In some circumstances, cases may be sent to other qualified lawyers. In those circumstances, TorHoerman Law maintains joint responsibility.