What Types of Cases Does a Negligent Security Attorney Handle?

What Is Negligent Security?

Negligent security is a type of premises liability law claim that arises when a property owner fails to take reasonable steps to protect lawful visitors from foreseeable criminal harm.

In practical terms, negligent security claims focus on whether the property owner failed to provide adequate security measures for the risks on the property and whether that failure contributed to an assault, robbery, shooting, or other violent incident.

A negligent security attorney evaluates whether the property had a known history of crime, recurring safety complaints, or obvious security gaps, and whether the owner ignored those warning signs.

These cases are not automatic just because a crime occurred; they require proof that inadequate security played a meaningful role in what happened.

When the evidence supports it, an injured person may file a negligent security claim (or file a negligent security lawsuit) to pursue compensation for injuries and losses.

A negligent security lawyer also works to preserve evidence quickly, because video and maintenance records can disappear in days.

What Negligent Security Looks Like

In negligent security cases, the failure is usually something concrete and fixable: missing protections, broken systems, or policies that were never enforced.

Common examples of inadequate security include a property owner failed to install or maintain adequate lighting, failed to control access, or failed to monitor known trouble areas.

Other cases involve absent or ineffective security guards, especially when guards are needed to deter violence or respond quickly to escalating issues.

Non-functioning or poorly placed security cameras can also support negligent security claims, particularly when cameras were promised, posted, or expected based on the setting.

Many negligent security cases also involve “paper security” where the property claims it has adequate security systems, but those security measures were not operational, staffed, or monitored when it mattered.

A negligent security lawyer will compare what was in place to what reasonable security measures looked like for that property type, location, and crime history.

The issue is whether adequate security measures were missing or ignored in a way that made harm more likely or more severe.

The “Foreseeability” Issue In Negligent Security Cases

Foreseeability is often the central dispute in negligent security claims because it determines whether a property owner had a duty to add or improve security measures.

Courts and insurers commonly focus on whether prior incidents, repeated complaints, or the nature of the property made the risk predictable enough that the owner should have implemented adequate security measures.

If there were prior assaults, robberies, or recurring criminal activity, the argument is that the property owner failed to respond with reasonable security measures such as improved lighting, working security cameras, controlled access, or appropriate security guards.

Foreseeability does not require the exact same crime to have happened before.

What matters is whether the risk of harm was reasonably predictable under the circumstances.

A negligent security attorney builds this part of the case using incident reports, calls for service, internal records, and evidence showing what the owner knew and when.

When foreseeability is supported, a negligent security lawsuit often becomes a question of whether the property’s security measures and adequate security systems matched the level of risk.

If they didn’t, and that gap helped enable the attack, a negligent security lawyer may recommend moving forward and file a negligent security action to seek accountability.

Different Types of Negligent Security

Negligent security incidents occur when a business owner or other property controller fails to protect visitors from foreseeable violent crime and criminal activity.

Different types of negligent security usually fall into a few recurring categories under premises liability and negligent security laws.

Different types of negligent security includes:

• Inadequate lighting and visibility hazards: Missing or broken adequate lighting in stairwells, entry points, hallways, and parking areas that should have been well-lit to deter crime and help people escape danger.
• Access-control failures: Broken gates, missing locks, unsecured doors, or “open access” policies that allow the wrong person to enter and linger without challenge, often a clear sign of improper security measures.
• Surveillance and monitoring failures: Missing cameras, non-working cameras, blind spots, or recordings that are not monitored or preserved, even when security systems property owners claim to have are supposed to deter crime or capture evidence.
• Security staffing failures: Too few guards for the setting, guards positioned away from high-risk areas, or failure to respond to obvious threats, especially when security professionals were required based on prior incidents.
• Hiring and training failures: Hiring untrained security guards, failing to supervise them, or using “warm body” security that can’t de-escalate conflict or respond to emergencies.
• Ignored warning signs: Repeated tenant/customer complaints, prior assaults, or a known pattern of criminal activity with no meaningful upgrades to provide adequate security measures.
• Event and crowd-control failures: Poor entry screening, no plan for fights or escalating behavior, and inadequate staffing at bars, venues, or late-night businesses where risks are predictable.

In many negligent security incidents, the problem isn’t a single mistake.

It’s a pattern of shortcuts that leaves people exposed.

How Different Types of Negligent Security Can Affect Your Case

The type of security failure matters because it shapes the “why” behind the harm, and that impacts both liability and damages.

When negligent property owners ignore lighting, access control, or staffing needs, the case often focuses on the property owner’s failure to protect visitors with proper security measures that were realistic and affordable.

If negligent security incidents occur after a site repeatedly experiences criminal activity, that history can strengthen the argument that the danger was foreseeable and preventable under premises liability rules.

Different failures also affect what evidence you need. Surveillance failures may require proving the cameras were missing or not working and showing how the lack of footage impacted the ability to identify what happened.

Staffing or training failures may require records showing hiring practices, post orders, guard logs, and whether security professionals were qualified, especially in cases involving hiring untrained security guards.

These details can also influence damages, because the more preventable the risk looks, the harder it is for negligent property owners to claim the attack was unavoidable.

When the injuries are severe, the case may also include a broader damages picture (medical expenses, medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering) plus long-term care needs when injuries don’t fully resolve.

In the worst outcomes, negligent security incidents can lead to wrongful death, and the legal claim may shift to surviving family members seeking accountability and financial support.

A security attorney can help you understand how the specific security breakdown ties into the legal theory and what it may take to recover compensation based on the facts.

What To Do After An Assault Or Attack On Someone Else’s Property

After an assault or attack, your priority is safety and medical care and the next priority is preserving proof while it still exists.

Steps that can help protect both your health and your legal options include:

1. Get to safety and call 911 if you’re in immediate danger or need emergency help.
2. Seek medical treatment right away, even if symptoms seem “minor,” and keep copies of records: medical bills and medical expenses become key proof later.
3. Report the incident and request documentation (police report or incident report) so there’s a clear timeline tied to the violent crime.
4. Photograph or record the scene if it’s safe, including broken locks, missing adequate lighting, blind spots, or other inadequate security measures.
5. Ask about cameras immediately and write down where cameras were located – security footage can be overwritten quickly.
6. Get witness contact information from anyone who saw the incident or the conditions that made it possible.
7. Document your losses as they develop, including lost wages, time missed from work, and any ongoing symptoms tied to common negligent security injuries.
8. Avoid giving recorded statements to insurers or the property before you’ve gotten legal advice, especially when a business owner is already trying to control the narrative.

If you suspect a property owner’s failure played a role, a security attorney can help you evaluate whether the facts support a claim under negligent security laws and what evidence to secure first.

If you want help sorting out your options, you can request a free consultation to discuss how the incident happened and what it may take to recover compensation.

Do You Qualify For A Negligent Security Lawsuit?

A negligent security case arises when you’re harmed by criminal acts on else’s property and the owner failed to take reasonable security steps to reduce a foreseeable risk.

In plain terms, negligent security occurs when the property owner owed a duty to provide adequate security, the property owner’s responsibility was ignored, and the incident occurred because there was a lack of security or a breakdown in proper security.

These cases often involve apartment complexes, a parking garage, bars, hotels, or retail properties where the property owner knew or should have known about prior crime, threats, or repeat problems.

Red flags include:

• Inadequate or broken lighting
• Poor lighting in entrances or stairwells
• Broken security cameras
• The absence of basic security measures like functioning locks, controlled access, or visible security personnel

You can still have legal options even if the defense tries to claim the attack was “random,” because the question is usually whether reasonable security could have reduced the risk or made the harm less severe.

A lawyer can also confirm the statute of limitations, because missing the deadline can prevent you from filing even when the facts are strong.

Gathering Evidence For A Negligent Security Claim

Negligent security falls apart or succeeds based on proof, and that proof is often time-sensitive.

Start with police reports and any documentation tied to law enforcement responses, because those records help establish when the incident occurred, what was reported, and how the scene was described.

If you can, preserve photos or video of the conditions that made the attack easier, especially inadequate or broken lighting, broken security cameras, missing locks, or unmonitored security systems.

Witness statements are also critical, including statements from people who saw the incident, noticed suspicious behavior beforehand, or can confirm the property had ongoing security problems.

Your case may also depend on showing the property owner knew about the risk, which can involve prior complaints, prior calls for service, and internal records showing what the property owner owed and failed to deliver.

Evidence often includes:

• Medical documentation showing injuries, treatment, and medical costs, including therapy or psychiatric care after trauma
• Police reports and related records documenting the incident and the response
• Photos/video of poor lighting, inadequate or broken lighting, broken security cameras, broken locks, or lack of security
• Witness statements from bystanders, tenants, employees, or other people who can confirm what happened and what conditions existed
• Property records showing what security systems existed (or didn’t), whether installing security cameras was discussed, and whether security personnel were scheduled
• Security contractor materials where relevant, including hiring files, training records, post orders, and screening practices (including law enforcement backgrounds when they’re used as a selling point)

Because footage can be overwritten and conditions can be “fixed” quickly after an incident, acting early is a major advantage, especially in litigating negligent security cases.

Damages In Negligent Security Claims

Damages are meant to measure what the incident took from you physically, financially, and emotionally.

In a negligent security claim, financial recovery can include medical costs, future treatment needs, lost income, and other out-of-pocket expenses that follow serious injuries.

Many claims also include non-economic damages for pain, trauma, and the disruption to daily life, especially when the harm includes long-term psychological effects like post traumatic stress disorder.

In the most serious cases, the incident can lead to permanent impairment or a wrongful death lawsuit brought by surviving family members seeking accountability and support.

People sometimes ask about maximum compensation, but the real outcome depends on what the evidence supports, how clear the security failures were, how foreseeable the risk was, and how well the losses are documented.

A strong case focuses on fair compensation grounded in medical records, wage proof, and credible evidence showing how negligent security occurs and why it was preventable.

TorHoerman Law: Attorneys for Different Types of Negligent Security

TorHoerman Law handles negligent security claims under personal injury law with a focus on building cases that are ready to stand up to aggressive defenses.

We investigate whether basic security measures were missing, whether security systems were functioning, and whether the property owner knew the risk and still failed to provide adequate security.

Our team looks closely at common failure points: poor lighting, inadequate or broken lighting, broken security cameras, absent security personnel, and policies that left people exposed to criminal acts.

We also gather police reports, witness statements, and property records to show what the property owner owed and how the lapse in reasonable security contributed to the harm.

If you’re weighing your legal options after an incident occurred at an apartment complex, a parking garage, or another property with a lack of security, we can walk you through what a claim may involve and what deadlines apply under the statute of limitations.

If you want help understanding whether you qualify, contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your situation and what it may take to pursue fair compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify immediately.