“Duty of care” is a common term in courtrooms across the country. It’s a principle that each member of society is expected, and obligated, to uphold. Individuals, groups, and companies are required to act with a reasonable standard of care to avoid harming others. While determining reasonable care might seem subjective, it’s a well-established standard used for determining guilt in tort law. State courts nationwide have established objective standards for duty of care. Deciphering whether a defendant breached this standard is how courts determine if he or she should be held liable for the other party’s injuries and damages. This determinant is applied in a breadth of cases including car accidents, workplace injuries, and many other lawsuits where an individual or group caused harm to another.
Read on to learn more.
So what exactly does duty of care mean?
Let’s look at the definition of Duty of Care:
Duty of care is a societal – and legal – obligation to act reasonably to avoid injuring or inflicting harm upon others. It applies to both individuals and organizations, and those who fail to uphold this responsibility can be held liable by law. Certain professions, such as doctors and lawyers, are held to a higher duty of care that obligates them to act in accordance with their professions’ expertise and standards of care.
Duty of care plays a key role in personal injury cases. All citizens are expected to exercise reasonable caution to avoid injuring others. This expectation is his or her legal duty of care. When courts determine that a defendant breached this duty, usually through negligence action or blatant disregard for the plaintiff’s safety, it’s likely he or she will be hold at least some level of liability for the plaintiff's injuries or losses. The defendant is then required to compensate the victim for any incurred damages.
Negligence means that a person acted in a way that put others in harm’s way. In personal injury cases, this means that the defendant did not exhibit the level of care that a person of good judgment would exercise in the same situation. Negligence can cover both the defendant’s actions and instances where he or she failed to act to prevent harm.
The Tenth Amendment of the Constitution gives individual states the right to develop their own standards for tort law. Because of this, duty of care varies state by state. However, most states use multi-factor analyses that include foreseeability tests and other factors to determine a breach of care.
Every American is obligated to act with a reasonable degree of care to protect the safety of others. This duty of care generally applies uniformly to all people in all situations. However, the law imposes additional duties of care on certain people and professionals who are responsible for the well being of the public and groups of people. Read on to learn more.
Manufacturers of common products have a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that their products do not harm or injure consumers. This is a basic tenant of defective product and liability law. Manufacturers are obligated to consider consumer safety when developing the design, distribution, and use of products.
Common law obligates employers to take the necessary steps to avoid the risks of reasonably foreseeable injuries and harm to their employees. These employer duty of care obligations help to ensure workplaces are safe and healthy. Employers that breach this duty can be held liable forworkplace injury lawsuits.
State premise liability laws obligate property owners to provide a reasonably safe premise for individuals who are on their property. They can be held liable for accidents and injuries that occur on their property including their home, land, vehicles, and other spaces. However, property owners can minimize their liability and prevent premise liability lawsuits by making reasonable efforts to protect visitors from damage and by limiting foreseeable harms.
Duty of care has several applications regarding businesses and corporations. Directors and officers of companies are expected to make decisions in good faith to consider the well-being of their employees and the public good. Failure to meet this duty is a common cause for liability in cases such as bad drug lawsuits, toxic torts, and other cases where a company’s actions harm a person or group.
Medical providers are obligated to act with a higher standard of care than many other professions. The American Medical Association’s modern Hippocratic Oath lays out the guiding principle, “First, do no harm.” Medical providers who do not treat patients with professional, adequate care can be held liable for medical malpractice lawsuits.
The constitution places a government duty of care for its institutions to “prevent foreseeable risks,” noting that the only risks considered foreseeable are “those that obstruct the performance of civic functions.” Government institutions can breach this duty of care in instances where they violate the U.S. Constitution, state constitutions, or the Bill of Rights. Plaintiffs can assert constitutional and tort claims against public officials and government institutions (often at the state or federal supreme courts) for violations such as illegal search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment, and unequal process.
Duty of care applies to every citizen. Each individual is obligated to act with reasonable care to prevent causing harm to others. This expectation also applies to organizations and businesses. Duty of care responsibilities and interpretations can change based on one’s standing or profession.
Examples of duty of care include:
Every individual, group, organization, and business owes a duty to act in a reasonable way to prevent harming others. This duty of care is a major tenant of tort law, and those who breach this duty can be held liable in civil litigation.
For a plaintiff (the victim) to prove strict liability and win a duty of care breach lawsuit, he or she must be able to prove four elements:
A plaintiff must first prove that a duty of care exists for the plaintiff. This can depend on the situation and the defendant’s position. For example, a bus driver is expected to yield to pedestrians at marked walkways. This is his duty of care that is established by law.
The plaintiff must then prove that the defendant breached his or her duty of care. In the bus driver example, this would mean that he failed to yield to the pedestrian.
In a breach of duty of care lawsuit, the defendant’s breach caused harm to the plaintiff. This can include both economic and non-economic damages. For example, if the bus driver struck a pedestrian while failing to yield, it’s likely he will be held liable for the pedestrian’s injuries, medical bills, and other incurred damages.
For a plaintiff to win the case, he or she must be able to prove that the damages were caused by the defendant’s breach of duty of care. This helps to ensure that individuals are not sued for costs and damages that they are not liable for. In the bus driver pedestrian accident case, there would have to be proof that the accident caused the pedestrian’s injuries.
Breaches in duty of care are common grounds for a wide variety of lawsuits. This ranges from cases against individuals to those taking on major corporations.
Here are a few breach of duty of care examples:
When a person, group, or business fails to uphold their duty of care, they could be held liable to face any number of personal injury lawsuits. These lawsuits are used to help victims earn compensation for their damages and get back to their lives. Read on to learn how a breach of duty of care leads to a personal injury lawsuit.
Breaches of duty of care can often lead to personal injury lawsuits. In these cases, plaintiffs (the victims) seek compensation for their damages by proving that defendants (the accused parties) are liable for their injuries. The goal is for this compensation to help the plaintiffs return the same physical, financial, and mental position they were in prior to the incident. To prove liability, a plaintiff must show that a defendant committed negligence or exhibited a blatant disregard for the plaintiff’s safety. This exhibits a breach of duty to exercise reasonable caution to keep other people safe. Once breached duty is established, the plaintiff is expected to prove that the defendant’s actions, or failure to act as reasonably expected, caused an injury to the plaintiff. If the plaintiff can prove the breached duty of care and show that it caused his or her damages, it is likely that the defendant will be held liable.
740 ILCS 130/ Premises Liability Act., www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2048&ChapterID=57.
Crowell, Jason. Duties of Care and the Constitution: A Negligence Model of Individual Rights, Yale Law School, digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1461&context=ylpr#:~:text=The%20duty%20of%20care%20the,the%20performance%20of%20civic%20functions.
“Duty of Care.” Legal Information Institute, Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duty_of_care#:~:text=Definition,person%20in%20their%20position%20would.
“Fact Sheet: Federal Preemption of Tort Law.” Centerjd.org, 9 Feb. 2015, centerjd.org/content/fact-sheet-federal-preemption-tort-law#:~:text=%5B6%5DThe%2010th%20Amendment%20states,Amend.
“Hazardous Waste.” EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 8 Dec. 2020, www.epa.gov/hw.
“Legal Dictionary – Law.com.” Law.com Legal Dictionary, dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=599.
LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE HEALTH, SAFETY & SECURITY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR US MOBILE WORKFORCE, International SOS Foundation © 2017 , www.fisherphillips.com/media/news/6158_US%20Legal%20Duty%20of%20Care%20whitepaper.pdf.
“Tort Liability for Negligence in Missouri .” e Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1030&context=ls.
“Tort.” Legal Information Institute, Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tort.
Tyson, Peter. “The Hippocratic Oath Today.” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 27 Mar. 2001, www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/hippocratic-oath-today/.
TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.
TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.
All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.
I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!
Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!
A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!
They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!
The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.
The attorneys at THL were extremely helpful with the legal aspects of setting up my small business.