If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bike accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
A self-driving car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law helps injured people and grieving families pursue compensation when automated or semi-automated driving systems contribute to a crash.
Rates of reported crashes involving automated driving systems and Level 2 driver-assistance features have risen as these technologies have spread, and federal actions (including NHTSA’s standing crash-reporting order and a recall tied to Autopilot misuse risks) reflect ongoing flaws in how these systems manage driver attention and real-world hazards.
TorHoerman Law is actively reviewing claims involving self-driving and driver-assist technology to determine whether a manufacturer, software provider, or other party should be held accountable.
Tesla vehicles and other vehicles equipped with driver-assist and semi-autonomous features have changed what a modern motor vehicle accident looks like.
In a Tesla car accident case, liability may turn on what an automated system did or failed to do in the seconds before impact, not just what the person behind the steering wheel remembers.
In many claims, courts and insurers evaluate fault for both the driver and the manufacturer when software behavior, warnings, or design choices appear to contribute to the collision.
These cases often require deeper accident investigations, including preservation of vehicle data, software versions, and time-stamped events tied to driver engagement.
Evidence from the crash scene matters too, especially where roadway markings, lighting, and traffic controls affect how driver-assist systems perceive hazards.
When automatic braking does not activate, activates too late, or activates unexpectedly, the difference can mean a minor collision versus catastrophic injury.
Some crashes also involve post-impact hazards, including vehicles that catch fire, which can raise additional questions about safety design and response after the initial collision.
A thorough case review looks at whether defective vehicles or failed critical components played a role, even when the car is marketed as advanced technology.
If you have been injured or your loved one has been tragically killed in a self-driving car accident, you may be eligible to file a claim and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation to get in touch with our law firm.
A “self-driving car accident” is a crash involving vehicles equipped with automated or semi-automated driving functions: systems that can steer, accelerate, and brake under certain conditions, while still requiring human supervision in many real-world situations.
SAE’s automation framework distinguishes between driver-assistance (where the human remains responsible) and higher levels of automation (where the system performs more of the driving task).
In the U.S., regulators track these crashes closely through NHTSA’s Standing General Order, which requires reporting of certain crashes involving vehicles with automated driving systems (ADS) or Level 2 advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS).
In practical terms, these cases often look like ordinary wrecks at the crash scene (a damaged vehicle, debris, injuries, and a police report) but the cause analysis can be very different.
A detailed investigation may focus on whether automated features were active, what the system “saw,” whether warnings were issued, and how the human responded.
That distinction matters when a tesla driver (or any driver) says they were supervising the system, yet the vehicle still failed to react to a hazard.
Understanding how automation is classified helps explain why liability in self-driving car accidents is often disputed.
Vehicles marketed as “self-driving” may still require constant human supervision, depending on the level of automation involved.
Federal regulators and safety organizations categorize automation to distinguish between driver-assist features and systems that perform more of the driving task.
These distinctions matter because responsibility can shift between the driver and the manufacturer based on what the system was designed to do.
In lawsuits, the specific level of automation active at the time of a crash often shapes how fault is evaluated.
Common levels of vehicle automation include:
Crashes involving self-driving or semi-autonomous vehicles often occur in predictable situations that expose the limits of automated systems.
Many of these incidents involve unique challenges that do not exist in ordinary motor vehicle accidents, such as system disengagement or delayed driver alerts.
Distracted driving becomes especially dangerous when drivers rely on autopilot features and fail to recognize hazards in time.
These crashes frequently cause extensive damage, making the preservation of critical evidence essential for later investigation.
In some cases, post-impact dangers such as battery fires or power loss complicate rescue and recovery efforts.
Each scenario requires careful analysis of vehicle data and scene conditions to understand how the technology performed.
Common crash scenarios include:
Not every crash involving automated driving features results in a viable claim, but many injured people and families may qualify.
The key question is whether the automated system, a defect, or a failure to warn contributed to the collision and your injuries.
These cases often require a more technical legal process than a standard wreck, including collecting vehicle data and preserving evidence before it is overwritten.
A qualified personal injury lawyer or accident attorney will look for proof that the technology malfunctioned, was misused in a foreseeable way, or that Tesla failed (or another manufacturer failed) to address known limitations.
Getting prompt medical attention also matters, both for your health and for documenting what the crash caused.
You may qualify for a self-driving car accident claim if:
These claims can still move forward even if responsibility is disputed, because a crash is not always explained by neither the driver nor the manufacturer being at fault.
Sometimes both contribute in different ways.
An experienced accident attorney can evaluate the evidence, identify the responsible parties, and protect you from pressure to accept an unfair settlement.
The sooner a Tesla accident lawyer gets involved, the easier it is to preserve data, interview witnesses, and secure expert review.
If you have questions, a personal injury lawyer can help you understand your options and what the next steps in the legal process look like.
Evidence is what turns a serious Tesla crash or other automated-driving collision into a case capable of proving liability.
These claims often hinge on a combination of traditional proof (like eyewitness accounts) and technical proof that explains how the vehicle and its systems behaved.
The earlier you preserve records, the harder it is for an insurance company to minimize what happened or shift blame without support.
Evidence may include:
In a self-driving car accident claim, “damages” are the losses the law may allow an injured person or a family to recover after a crash.
Lawyers assess damages by collecting proof of harm (medical records, billing statements, employment documentation, and expert opinions) to show what the accident cost you now and what it will cost in the future.
This calculation includes both financial losses, like medical expenses and lost wages, and personal harms that are harder to quantify, such as pain, limitations, and emotional distress.
In severe cases, attorneys may also pursue punitive damages or a wrongful death recovery when the facts support those claims.
Damages may include:
Liability in a self-driving car accident often involves more than one party because automated systems can affect how a vehicle accelerates, brakes, and steers.
Investigations focus on what the human driver did, what the system did, and whether a defect or failure to warn contributed to the crash.
In many cases, responsibility is shared, especially when driver-assist features required supervision but the technology also performed unpredictably or failed to respond to hazards.
A thorough legal review identifies every potentially responsible party so victims do not leave compensation on the table.
Parties who may be held liable include:
The actions you take immediately after a self-driving car accident can affect both your recovery and your ability to pursue a claim.
Your safety and health come first, especially because injuries may not be obvious right away.
Proper documentation at the scene helps preserve evidence that may later be critical in proving how the automated system or driver behavior contributed to the crash.
Reporting the incident creates an official record that can support your case. Acting quickly also reduces the risk that important data or witness information will be lost.
Steps to take after a self-driving car accident:
Hiring a Tesla car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law gives victims access to attorneys who understand both personal injury law and the complexities of modern vehicle technology.
These cases often involve Autopilot systems, software data, and technical evidence that require immediate and careful investigation.
TorHoerman Law works quickly to preserve vehicle data, review crash reports, and identify whether a defect or system failure contributed to the accident.
Our attorneys collaborate with engineers, accident reconstruction experts, and medical professionals to build strong, evidence-based claims.
We handle all communication with Tesla, insurers, and opposing counsel so clients can focus on recovery.
Every case is approached with personal attention and a commitment to accountability. With TorHoerman Law, victims have an experienced advocate prepared to pursue full and fair compensation.
Self-driving and automated vehicle crashes raise serious questions about safety, accountability, and responsibility when technology fails.
Victims and families should not be left to navigate these complex claims on their own, especially when powerful manufacturers and insurers are involved.
TorHoerman Law brings the resources, technical knowledge, and experienced lawyers needed to investigate how automated systems, driver behavior, and defects contribute to these accidents.
If you or a loved one were injured or killed in a self-driving car accident, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Our experienced lawyers are ready to review your case and help you pursue the compensation and accountability you deserve.
Self-driving car accident claims usually rely on two core legal theories: product liability and negligence, and they require evidence that shows not only what happened at the crash scene, but what the vehicle’s systems were doing in the seconds leading up to impact.
Product liability focuses on defects in the vehicle or its software, while negligence addresses a failure to use reasonable care, which can apply to drivers, manufacturers, software developers, or even government entities responsible for road design and traffic control.
Because legal liability in these cases often shifts beyond the driver, data logs and black boxes become crucial for determining fault, especially when the automated system’s behavior is disputed.
In Tesla cases, the onboard computer can record operational data such as speed, brake usage, and Autopilot engagement, and Tesla vehicles store additional information in an event data recorder that can document feature status, driver engagement, and alerts.
Eyewitness accounts and official police reports still matter, but they are often paired with this digital evidence to show whether the system performed safely and whether a defect contributed to the crash.
A manufacturer can be held liable if it can be proven the vehicle was defective when sold and that defect caused the accident, and proving liability may require a detailed analysis of operational data and driver engagement records.
Accessing Tesla’s operational data often requires specialized tools or formal legal processes, which is why proving fault in these cases typically demands attorneys who understand both the law and the technology involved.
Self-driving and semi-autonomous systems can reduce workload, but Tesla’s Autopilot is a Level 2 ADAS that still requires active supervision, and regulators have cited gaps in driver engagement controls.
NHTSA has opened and closed major investigations into Autopilot and then moved into follow-on review of recall effectiveness, reflecting ongoing concerns about system design and real-world performance.
For victims, these risks matter because liability can hinge on whether the driver-assist system encouraged inattention, failed to respond to hazards, or lacked safeguards that a reasonable design would include.
If you were hurt in a crash involving driver-assist or automated features, preserving vehicle data and getting a technical review early can be decisive in proving what happened.
Responsibility in a self-driving or driver-assist crash is not automatically assigned to the driver or the manufacturer.
It depends on what the system was designed to do, what it did in the moments before impact, and what the driver did to supervise it.
In many cases, a driver may still carry fault because Level 2 systems require hands-on supervision, but manufacturers and software developers can also be liable if a defect, inadequate warnings, or unsafe design contributed to the collision.
Liability can extend further if poor maintenance, defective components, or unsafe roadway design played a role.
That’s why these cases usually require a technical review of vehicle data, crash-scene evidence, and expert analysis to determine how responsibility should be allocated.
Recent incidents involving Tesla vehicles have produced wrongful-death filings, defect allegations, and a major Autopilot verdict, showing how quickly a crash can become a product-liability dispute.
In several cases, reporting describes situations where a Tesla hit a fixed object or another vehicle and the litigation turned on whether the vehicle’s design, warnings, or driver-assist behavior contributed.
One of the most closely watched outcomes came when a federal jury weighed Autopilot evidence and returned a plaintiff verdict, with public comments from Elon Musk about appealing.
Other lawsuits have focused on post-crash survivability, especially whether occupants could escape when power was lost and the vehicle burned.
Some incidents are also known primarily because Tesla reported (or authorities reported) the crash publicly, which later became part of a legal claim or investigation record.
Incidents (chronological order):
These examples show why case outcomes depend on specifics: whether driver-assist was active, what the vehicle recorded, and how the crash unfolded second-by-second.
In the Florida case, the Autopilot narrative and trial evidence were central, and the verdict drew national attention because it tested how jurors allocate fault between Tesla and the driver.
In the Wisconsin matter, the litigation focus shifted toward post-crash escape and survivability, claims that the design turned a collision into a fatal event for five occupants.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.