If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bike accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Bard PowerPort catheter infection lawsuit claims center on allegations that defects in Bard’s implantable port systems increased the risk of bacterial contamination and bloodstream infection.
Catheter-related infections can lead to serious medical consequences, including sepsis, organ damage, prolonged hospitalization, and other life-threatening complications that disrupt a patient’s overall health.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting new claims from individuals who developed infections after receiving a Bard PowerPort device.
Bard PowerPort lawsuits allege that defects in the device’s catheter and port components increased the risk of infection and other serious injuries in patients who relied on the system for long-term vascular access.
These cases are now centralized in the Bard PowerPort multidistrict litigation, where plaintiffs claim that failures at the port site and catheter tip allowed bacteria to enter the bloodstream.
Catheter related bloodstream infections and other port infections have been reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, IV medications, and blood transfusions, particularly among adult oncologic patients with weakened immune systems.
Medical records in these cases often document early port infections that progressed despite treatment, sometimes requiring urgent port removal to control the spread of infection.
Plaintiffs contend that Bard failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about known risk factors associated with catheter degradation and long-term implantation.
In some cases, alleged device failure involved catheter fragments breaking away and entering the patient’s vascular system, increasing the risk of infection and systemic inflammation.
These events have been linked to severe complications such as sepsis, prolonged hospitalization, and permanent health impairment.
As litigation continues, individuals who suffered infections after receiving a Bard PowerPort device are evaluating their legal options within the federal MDL framework.
If you or a loved one were injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort lawsuit instantly.
The Bard PowerPort, manufactured by Bard Access Systems Inc., is a medical device designed to provide access to a patient’s bloodstream.
This access point is critical in modern medicine, allowing healthcare professionals to perform various medical procedures.
The Bard PowerPort consists of a small chamber and catheter surgically implanted beneath the patient’s skin.

The catheter is then threaded into a large vein, typically in the chest, as a conduit for administering drugs, fluids, or blood products.
This device is widely used in cancer treatment, long-term antibiotic therapy, and other medical conditions that require frequent intravenous access.
Bard PowerPort devices are primarily used by patients who require long-term intravenous therapy or frequent access to their veins.
Patients who use the Bard PowerPort device may include:
The convenience and supposed reliability of the Bard PowerPort device have made it an attractive option for healthcare providers and patients seeking a more comfortable and efficient means of delivering crucial treatments.
As we’ve established, the Bard PowerPort is a type of subcutaneous central venous port designed to provide reliable long-term vascular access, particularly for patients undergoing chemotherapy and other infusion therapies.
While these devices are routinely placed and managed through interventional radiology or surgical procedures, a growing number of patients have reported serious complications after having a Bard implant port system implanted.
The Bard port catheter lawsuit claims that defects in the device’s design and catheter material increased the likelihood of mechanical failure and patient injury.
Medical literature recognizes that implanted ports already carry independent risk factors for complications due to repeated access, immune suppression, and prolonged use.
However, plaintiffs allege that defective PowerPort devices posed risks beyond those normally expected, leading to premature failure, internal damage, and the need for emergency intervention.
Reported adverse events include both mechanical and vascular injuries, some of which required device removal or additional surgeries.

Patients involved in the litigation have reported a wide range of major complications, including:
While infection-related injuries are a central focus of many claims, they represent only one category of harm associated with the PowerPort system.
The litigation highlights how structural failure, material degradation, and loss of catheter integrity can expose patients to serious medical risks, even when the device was initially implanted correctly.
Subsequent sections examine infection-related complications in greater detail and explain how they factor into individual Bard PowerPort claims.
In many Bard PowerPort cases, infection is a central injury, often developing after the device has been in place for an extended period.
Implantable ports, including the Bard port-a-cath, are designed to allow repeated access for chemotherapy, medications, and blood draws, but they rely on the long-term integrity of the catheter and port housing to remain safe.
Plaintiffs allege that when catheter material degrades over time, microscopic cracks and surface irregularities can form, creating an environment where bacteria can adhere and proliferate.
According to allegations in the litigation, catheter failure may allow bacteria to enter the bloodstream directly, transforming what might begin as a localized port infection into a systemic condition.
Infection is a common complication of implanted venous access devices, but Bard PowerPort claims argue that the rate and severity of infections exceeded what patients and providers were warned to expect.
In some cases, infections progressed rapidly despite antibiotic treatment, leaving surgical intervention, including urgent port removal, the only viable option.
Once infection spreads beyond the port site, patients may experience serious medical complications requiring prolonged hospitalization, intensive care, or multiple invasive procedures.
These infections can disrupt cancer treatment schedules, delay infusions, and place already vulnerable patients at heightened risk.
The litigation further alleges that defective catheter design contributed to a cascade of associated complications, particularly when bacterial contamination reached central circulation.

Possible complications of catheter infections include:
Catheter infections associated with Bard PowerPort devices are believed to result from a combination of design-related issues and the inherent risks of implanted vascular access systems.
Like many implantable devices, a port catheter device must remain stable and intact inside the body over long periods while being accessed repeatedly for medications, chemotherapy, and long-term IV treatments.
When any component of the device degrades or becomes compromised, it can create pathways for bacteria to enter the body and reach the bloodstream.
Plaintiffs allege that Bard PowerPort catheters are manufactured using Chronoflex AL, a blend of polyurethane and barium sulfate intended to provide flexibility and imaging visibility.
Over time, this material may weaken and develop cracks, fissures, or surface irregularities, particularly at stress points along the catheter.
These microscopic defects can promote bacterial growth, allowing pathogens to colonize areas that are difficult for the immune system or antibiotics to reach.
Even when the device is inserted with proper placement and sterile technique at the surgical site, degraded catheter surfaces may still pose an infection risk once implanted.

As bacteria accumulate within damaged sections of the catheter, localized port infections can progress into more serious bloodstream infections.
This risk is heightened in patients who rely on frequent access to the port for ongoing treatment, as repeated use increases mechanical stress and exposure.
The Bard PowerPort MDL argues that these material-related vulnerabilities contributed to infection rates and severity beyond what patients and providers were warned to expect.
The materials used in the construction of Bard PowerPort devices, while chosen for their biocompatibility, strength, and durability, are not impervious to the rigors of long-term use within the human body.
Over time, these materials may undergo wear, tear, and degradation.
Such structural compromises render them more susceptible to developing cracks or fissures, which, unfortunately, can serve as breeding grounds for bacteria.
While not immediately apparent, this material vulnerability poses a significant risk to patients who rely on Bard PowerPort devices for continuous medical care.
These microscopic openings provide opportunistic pathogens with a route to access blood vessels, thereby increasing the likelihood of infection.
The presence of a catheter within the body, although medically necessary, represents an inherent foreign body.
In essence, it creates an artificial passage into the bloodstream.
This entry point can be exploited by bacteria and other microorganisms.
While typically sterile upon insertion, this foreign body is not immune to contamination, especially in the presence of the aforementioned material vulnerabilities.
When the catheter’s integrity is compromised through fracturing or cracking, it becomes a beacon for bacteria, allowing them to enter and colonize the area.
This can set the stage for infection, blood clots, and deep vein thrombosis, potentially leading to grave consequences if not promptly addressed.
Many patients requiring Bard PowerPort devices do so for extended periods, sometimes several months or even years.
While these devices offer the advantage of consistent intravenous access, this extended duration of placement also increases the susceptibility to infections over time.
The longer a Bard PowerPort device remains in place, the greater the opportunity for contaminants to infiltrate the system, potentially leading to serious injuries and conditions.
Catheter infections, while often underestimated, can have far-reaching and profound consequences for patients, affecting their physical health and overall well-being.
The complexities and potential severity of these health complications deserve a comprehensive examination.

Among the most critical complications stemming from catheter infections are systemic infections, which pose a grave risk to patients.
These infections, originating from catheter-related complications, can rapidly spread throughout the body.
Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, represents the ultimate consequence of unchecked systemic infections.
It is characterized by widespread inflammation, organ dysfunction, and a heightened risk of mortality.
When infections infiltrate the bloodstream via catheter-related issues, they can provoke an uncontrolled immune response, sending the body into a state of crisis.
Organs may begin to fail, leading to a dire medical emergency. Sepsis requires immediate and aggressive medical intervention, often involving intensive care and treatment with antibiotics and other medications.
Infections localized at the catheter insertion site can inflict significant discomfort and distress upon patients.
This localized inflammation can manifest as pain, swelling, redness, and irritation, impairing the patient’s quality of life.
Pain can be incredibly disruptive, interfering with daily activities and hindering the effectiveness of ongoing treatment.
Additionally, the physical discomfort can take a toll on a patient’s emotional well-being, further complicating the healing process.
Catheter infections not only jeopardize the patient’s health but also compromise the very functionality of the Bard PowerPort device itself.
When an infection takes hold, it can impede the device’s operation, hindering the delivery of critical medications, fluids, or other essential treatments.
In some cases, the device may become entirely inoperative, necessitating its removal or replacement.
Removing or replacing an infected Bard PowerPort device introduces additional medical procedures and disruptions to the patient’s healthcare journey.
This translates to increased physical and emotional strain on the patient and potential delays in receiving necessary treatments.
Severe infections stemming from Bard PowerPort catheters often mandate extended hospital stays and intensive treatment.
These prolonged hospitalizations impose a multifaceted burden on patients and their families.
In addition to the physical toll, they can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety and distress.
Moreover, the financial implications of extended hospitalization can be overwhelming, further exacerbating the challenges faced by patients and their loved ones.
The Bard PowerPort litigation brings together claims from patients who allege they were harmed by defects in the Bard Power Port implantable catheter system.
These lawsuits seek to hold the manufacturer accountable for injuries linked to device failure, including infection, catheter fracture, migration, and other serious complications.
Plaintiffs contend that Bard failed to properly test the device, identify long-term risks, and provide adequate warnings to patients and healthcare providers.

By pursuing accountability through coordinated litigation, injured individuals aim to recover compensation while also forcing greater transparency and safety improvements in the medical device industry.
There is no established “average” settlement for Bard PowerPort cases because the litigation is ongoing and no global settlement has been announced.
TorHoerman Law’s Bard PowerPort attorneys estimate that potential Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement amounts could range from $10,000 to over $250,000, depending on the direction of the litigation and the facts of an individual case.
Settlement value typically increases when medical records show device fracture or migration, serious infection, invasive removal or revision procedures, extended hospitalization, lasting impairment, or significant disruption to treatment.
Claims involving earlier detection and removal with limited long-term consequences may fall closer to the lower end of projected ranges, while severe outcomes with documented complications and high medical costs may fall substantially higher.
The Bard PowerPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit highlights the challenges faced by patients who have experienced catheter infections due to using this medical device.
While port catheters have been a valuable tool in medical treatment, the susceptibility to infections due to material vulnerabilities in Bard PowerPort devices has raised serious concerns.
Patients affected by these infections are seeking justice through lawsuits to hold the manufacturer accountable for the harm they have endured.

If you or a loved one has been injured by a Bard PowerPort device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can use the chatbot on this page to determine if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.
A Bard PowerPort injury lawyer can provide guidance and support during this difficult time, in the pursuit of fair compensation and accountability.
Reach out to our team with any questions you may have about the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.
Yes, there have been FDA recalls involving certain Bard PowerPort products, but it is important to understand what those recalls did and did not cover.
The FDA issued Class II recalls for specific PowerPort components and models after identifying manufacturing or design issues that could pose health risks. One recall, initiated in October 2019, involved a tunneler component used with PowerPort implantable ports due to a mismatch that could affect device performance.
Another recall, initiated in January 2020, involved the PowerPort ClearVUE Slim Implantable Port, related to a catheter lock mechanism that did not meet specifications.
These recalls did not explicitly address all of the catheter material degradation and fracture issues alleged in current lawsuits.
Many plaintiffs in the Bard PowerPort litigation report injuries that occurred outside the scope or time frame of the recalls, including infections, fractures, and migration of catheter components.
The lawsuits argue that Bard continued to market the device despite knowing about broader risks that were not fully disclosed through recall notices.
As a result, the existence of limited recalls has become part of the larger factual background in the Bard PowerPort litigation, but it does not resolve or negate the claims being pursued in court.
Catheter infections are a significant factor in evaluating Bard PowerPort claims because they can lead to serious medical consequences, including prolonged hospitalization, invasive treatment, and disruption of ongoing care such as chemotherapy.
Claims involving bloodstream infections, sepsis, or infections that required urgent port removal or surgical intervention are typically considered more severe than cases resolved with antibiotics alone.
Medical documentation showing the timing of infection, culture results, treatment course, and long-term health effects plays a critical role in assessing potential compensation.
As a result, infection-related injuries often place a case into a higher settlement tier within the Bard PowerPort litigation, depending on the extent of harm and lasting impact.
Medical documentation plays a central role in evaluating Bard PowerPort catheter infection claims because it shows how the device was implanted, how the infection developed, and how it was treated.
Records help establish timelines, rule out alternative causes, and document the severity of the infection and related complications.
Important records often include:
These records help attorneys and medical experts evaluate whether the infection may be linked to device-related issues and how it fits within the broader Bard PowerPort litigation.
Bard PowerPort catheter infection lawsuits are being filed by patients who experienced complications after receiving an implanted Bard PowerPort device for long-term vascular access.
Many of these claims involve individuals who relied on the device for chemotherapy, IV medications, or other recurring treatments and later developed infections or related complications.
The lawsuits are part of a broader effort to evaluate whether defects in the device or inadequate warnings contributed to patient harm.
These claims are now being handled through coordinated federal litigation to allow consistent review of shared evidence and allegations.
Underlying health conditions may be reviewed when evaluating Bard PowerPort claims, but they do not automatically prevent someone from pursuing a lawsuit.
In many cases, patients receiving implantable port devices already face complex medical challenges, including cancer, immune suppression, or conditions such as diabetes mellitus, which can increase baseline risks.
The central question in Bard PowerPort litigation is whether defects in the device or inadequate warnings contributed to injuries beyond those inherent medical risks.
Even when a patient has preexisting conditions, lawsuits may proceed if evidence suggests the device failed or performed in a way that exposed the patient to additional harm.
Bard PowerPort cases are handled together in federal court to promote efficiency and consistency when thousands of patients raise similar factual and legal issues.
By consolidating these claims into a multidistrict litigation, the court can coordinate discovery, manage expert evidence, and issue uniform pretrial rulings that apply across cases.
This approach prevents conflicting decisions and reduces the burden on individual courts while preserving each plaintiff’s right to pursue an individual claim.
In this context, individual claims are grouped alongside other port-a-cath lawsuits involving similar allegations of device failure and patient injury, even though each case is evaluated on its own facts.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.