Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit [2026 Update] | Heavy Metals Found in Baby Food

November 5th, 2025:  Supreme Court Weighs Jurisdiction Dispute in Hain and Whole Foods Baby Food Case

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday over whether a federal judgment in a baby food lawsuit against Hain Celestial Group and Whole Foods should stand after the Fifth Circuit ruled the case was improperly removed from state court.

The dispute centers on whether a final judgment must be vacated when an appellate court later determines that a non-diverse defendant, such as Whole Foods, was wrongly dismissed.

Texas parents Grant and Sarah Palmquist allege that Hain’s “Earth’s Best Organic” baby food, purchased from Whole Foods, caused their son’s autism and heavy-metal poisoning.

The Fifth Circuit found that the district court erred in keeping the case in federal court after dismissing Whole Foods, a Texas-based defendant, which destroyed diversity jurisdiction.

During oral arguments, several justices, including Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, raised concerns about depriving plaintiffs of their chosen forum.

Hain’s counsel argued that the plaintiffs suffered no real prejudice, but Justice Sotomayor countered that losing the ability to sue “the people you want to sue in the forum you want” is a material disadvantage.

November 3rd, 2025: November 2025 JPML Update

The toxic baby food lawsuit saw an increase in filed cases between October and November.

The number of cases went from 225 in October to 272 in November.

This marks a steady rise in claims as more families continue to come forward.

Plaintiffs allege that exposure to heavy metals in certain baby food products contributed to developmental issues, including autism and ADHD.

The lawsuit remains active, with continued filings expected as investigations progress.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

October 28th, 2025: Families Defend Experts, Push for Bellwether Trials in Baby Food MDL

Parents suing baby food manufacturers over heavy metal exposure are urging the court to move forward with bellwether trials, defending their scientific experts against motions to exclude them.

On October 25, 2025, families told U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley that their eight experts, including toxicologists and epidemiologists, used reliable, peer-reviewed science to support claims that heavy metals like lead and arsenic increase the risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and ADHD in young children.

The plaintiffs argue that the defense is trying to relitigate well-established science rather than contest the admissibility of expert methodology, which is the legal threshold at this stage.

Manufacturers like Gerber, Beech-Nut, and Nurture claim there’s no direct study linking baby food to neurodevelopmental disorders.

But plaintiffs say this misses the point: the science linking early lead and arsenic exposure to ASD and ADHD is broad and well-supported, regardless of the source.

The plaintiffs also rejected claims that the nutritional value of baby food cancels out the dangers of toxic contamination.

As they put it: “Water contaminated with poison is not safe because water is ‘good for humans.’”

Judge Corley previously dismissed the foreign parent companies of Nestlé, Danone, and Hero from the MDL, but allowed claims to continue against their U.S.-based subsidiaries and other domestic companies.

The litigation now focuses on Gerber, Beech-Nut, Nurture, Plum Organics, Sprout, Walmart, and others.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to deny the motions to exclude their experts and to set a process for selecting bellwether trials.

If approved, these trials will serve as early test cases for juries to assess the core claims of the litigation.

The MDL is In re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3101, in the Northern District of California.

October 20th, 2025: Toxic Metals Found in Infant Formula Spark Safety and Legal Concerns

New lab testing by the Clean Label Project found dangerous levels of heavy metals—including arsenic, cadmium, and DEHP—in several U.S. infant formulas, prompting the FDA to promise stricter oversight and updated safety standards.

The results showed DEHP contamination in nearly 95% of older brands, despite its known links to cancer and neurological harm.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary announced plans to make manufacturers prove their products’ safety as part of a new testing initiative.

The findings raise potential product liability and failure-to-warn claims, as some newer brands reportedly achieved zero detectable toxins, suggesting safer alternatives exist.

As regulators tighten scrutiny, these revelations could fuel lawsuits alleging that formula makers prioritized profit over infant safety, marking a new front in litigation over toxic exposure in children’s products.

October 17th, 2025: Amazon Faces Negligence and Strict Liability Claims in Toxic Baby Food Case

A federal judge in California has allowed key claims to proceed in the toxic baby food MDL against Amazon, holding the company may be liable for selling products contaminated with heavy metals.

Parents allege that Amazon knowingly distributed baby food containing arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, substances linked to developmental disorders such as autism.

While the court dismissed warranty and consumer protection claims, it ruled that Amazon may still face negligence and strict liability claims, based on its role in monitoring and distributing the products.

The court pointed to Amazon’s internal investigations and communications with baby food manufacturers Nurture and Hain, concluding that Amazon likely took on a duty to ensure product safety but failed to follow through.

According to the complaint, Amazon continued to sell flagged products without warnings, despite incomplete responses from the manufacturers.

Under Louisiana law, the court also allowed a redhibition claim against Amazon to proceed, finding that plaintiffs plausibly alleged Amazon knowingly sold defective baby food.

However, similar claims against Whole Foods were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of its direct knowledge.

October 6th, 2025: Baby Food Makers Move to Exclude Key Causation Experts in Toxic Metals MDL

Baby food manufacturers, including Gerber and Beech-Nut, are petitioning Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to prevent two key expert witnesses from testifying in the federal toxic baby food MDL, which consolidates more than 200 lawsuits in the Northern District of California.

The motion, filed September 26, seeks to block testimony from dietician Priscilla Barr and exposure scientist Rachael Jones, Ph.D., who are expected to connect heavy metal contamination in baby food to autism and ADHD in children.

Defendants argue that the plaintiffs’ experts are attempting to link developmental disorders to “trace levels” of metals such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, despite evidence showing that concentrations in some products are nearly 200 times the allowable lead levels for bottled water.

They further argue that similar exposures occur through regular consumption of fruits and vegetables, and that autism rates have risen even as national heavy metal exposure has declined.

If Judge Corley grants the motion, plaintiffs may lose the opportunity to prove causation to a jury, possibly leading to many case dismissals.

However, parallel lawsuits in California state court, where the first trial is expected to proceed later this year, would remain unaffected.

That state trial is closely watched because its outcome could influence future settlement values in the broader baby food litigation.

October 1st, 2025: October 2025 JPML Update

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit saw an increase in filings between September and October, rising from 210 to 225 cases.

This litigation involves claims that several baby food brands sold products containing harmful levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

These metals have been linked to developmental delays and neurological issues in children, including autism and ADHD.

The rise in cases suggests continued engagement from parents and guardians seeking accountability and compensation for harm done.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

September 22, 2025: Potential Liability Following Sprout Organics Baby Food Recall

Sprout Organics has initiated a voluntary recall of a lot of its Sweet Potato, Apple & Spinach 3.5-ounce baby puree pouches due to concerns that the product may contain elevated levels of lead.

The recalled lot is identified by lot code 4212 with an expiration date of October 29, 2025.

The pouches were primarily distributed through Walgreens and certain independent retailers in the Southern United States, with most sales occurring during the period between September and December 2024.

The recall was triggered by routine sampling and testing which revealed the potential for elevated lead contents.

Consumers who have purchased pouches from the affected batch are being advised to check the lot code printed on the bottom strip of the back of the pouch, and to return the product to the point of purchase for a full refund.

Sprout Organics is already named as a defendant in the baby food heavy metals lawsuit, with other product lines from the company having tested positive for lead contamination.

The mass tort lawsuit claims that exposure to heavy metals in certain baby food products is linked to an increased risk of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

September 10th, 2025: New Introduced Legislation

New York has introduced the Baby Food Safety and Transparency Act, aiming to combat toxic heavy metals in baby food.

The proposed law would require all baby food sold in the state to undergo monthly testing for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury.

Testing must be performed by ISO/IEC 17025:2017-accredited laboratories using sensitive FDA-aligned methods.

Highlights of the law include:

• Sale Ban: Baby food products exceeding state-established heavy metal limits will be considered adulterated and unsafe.
• Mandatory Testing: Manufacturers must test each production batch at least once per month and maintain detailed records.
• Public Disclosure: Test results—including levels of each metal—must be published online and linked via a QR code on product labels.
• Labeling Requirement: Baby food packaging must include a statement directing consumers to testing data via QR code.
• Consumer Reporting System: New York will establish a mechanism for the public to report non-compliant products.

This legislation responds to longstanding concerns that federal standards inadequately protect children from heavy metal exposure.

If passed, the law could become one of the strictest state-level food safety frameworks in the U.S.

September 2, 2025: September 2025 JPML Update

Case filings in the toxic heavy metals baby food litigation remained stable between August and September.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 211 pending actions in August and 210 pending actions in September, a decrease of a single case.

These lawsuits allege that major baby food manufacturers sold products containing unsafe levels of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Plaintiffs claim that exposure to these contaminants has led to developmental delays and neurological disorders in children.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

August 27th, 2025: Texas AG Probes Baby Food Makers Over Heavy Metals as MDL Advances

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has initiated an investigation into major baby food brands, including Gerber and Plum Organics, over allegations that the companies falsely advertised products containing unsafe amounts of heavy metals. 

The attorney general’s office issued civil investigative demands and indicated that more companies will be targeted as the investigation expands.

Paxton said manufacturers have established internal limits for toxins such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury at levels that present known risks of neurological damage to children.

Both Gerber and Plum Organics responded, asserting their products meet or exceed U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards and undergo thorough testing before sale.

The state inquiry comes alongside ongoing multidistrict litigation in California federal court, where parents allege that exposure to heavy metals in baby foods caused developmental disorders in their children.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley recently narrowed the case by dismissing several foreign parent companies, while keeping domestic manufacturers—including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Nurture, Plum, Walmart, Sprout Foods, and Neptune Wellness Solutions—in the litigation.

August 21st, 2025: Illinois Enacts Law Mandating Baby Food Testing for Toxic Heavy Metals

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has signed Senate Bill 73, which mandates that baby food manufacturers test products for toxic heavy metals starting January 1, 2026.

Monthly testing must include arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and other metals, with results made publicly available starting January 1, 2027.

The law bans the sale or distribution of baby food that surpasses FDA limits for these substances.

It also enables parents to report products to the Illinois Department of Public Health if contamination levels exceed federal thresholds.

The legislation establishes new regulatory requirements for companies as lawsuits over heavy metals in baby food persist in courts nationwide.

August 13th, 2025: Report Finds Gaps in Baby Food Heavy Metal Testing Transparency Amid Ongoing Lawsuits

A new report by Consumer Reports and Unleaded Kids indicates that many baby food manufacturers are not providing easily accessible test results for toxic heavy metals, despite new regulatory requirements in California.

The findings come as more than 200 lawsuits are pending in federal court, alleging that exposure to heavy metals in baby foods caused autism, ADHD, and other developmental disorders in children.

California Assembly Bill 899, which took effect in January 2024, requires baby food makers to conduct monthly testing for arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury and publicly post the results.

The review examined 39 brands, awarding the highest ratings to those publishing complete testing data on their websites.

Sixteen brands (including Gerber, Plum Organics, and Earth’s Best) met this standard, while 21 others, such as Beech-Nut, Walmart’s Parent’s Choice, and Target’s Good & Gather Baby, required consumers to enter product codes or take additional steps to view results.

The lawsuits, consolidated in multidistrict litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about the risks of heavy metal exposure in their products.

Plaintiffs argue that internal testing and public reports have long shown the presence of these contaminants at levels far exceeding safety guidelines.

Consumer Reports urged parents to diversify children’s diets, avoid rice-based foods, peel root vegetables, and limit fruit juice consumption as measures to reduce potential exposure.

August 12th, 2025: FDA Urges Stronger Industry Collaboration on Infant and Child Food Recalls

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a letter to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of infant formula, baby food, and children’s food products, calling for enhanced collaboration and improved recall communications.

The agency emphasized the importance of rapid, transparent, and comprehensive public notifications to better protect vulnerable populations.

The FDA urged companies to notify the agency immediately when initiating a recall and to expand consumer outreach efforts, including through broader public announcements and clearer messaging.

As part of the initiative, the agency plans to create a centralized, consumer-friendly webpage dedicated to infant and child food recalls, improve search and filtering functions for recall data, and accelerate its recall classification process.

Long-term goals include integrating AI-assisted analysis into recall communications and launching a digital platform for standardized recall data submissions by industry.

These actions are part of “Operation Stork Speed,” an ongoing FDA effort to improve transparency and timeliness in recalls, particularly in response to recent contamination incidents and past supply chain disruptions affecting infant formula and other children’s foods.

August 1st, 2025: August 2025 JPML Update

The Toxic Baby Food MDL grew by 31 cases between July and August, reaching a total of 211 pending actions.

This marks the largest monthly increase since the start of 2024.

The litigation focuses on allegations that baby food products contained elevated levels of toxic heavy metals, which plaintiffs claim contributed to neurodevelopmental disorders.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

July 29th, 2025: Senators Introduce Bill to Ban Toxic Metals in Baby Formula

On July 23, 2025, U.S. Senators Katie Britt, Tom Cotton, Rick Scott, and Josh Hawley introduced the Safe Baby Formula Act, aiming to eliminate toxic heavy metals from infant formula.

The bill would ban the inclusion of harmful metals and require the FDA to study their long-term health impacts on infants.

The legislation follows growing concern from parents and health advocates over the presence of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in baby formula and baby foods.

These substances have been linked to neurodevelopmental delays and other serious health risks.

Senator Britt emphasized that protecting children’s health is vital to strengthening American families.

Senator Cotton added that the law would increase transparency and ensure parents can trust the products they feed their babies.

This bill could strengthen litigation claims in the ongoing toxic baby food lawsuits, which allege that manufacturers knowingly sold products containing dangerous levels of heavy metals.

Plaintiffs argue that these products have put children at risk for autism, ADHD, and other developmental conditions.

If passed, the Safe Baby Formula Act would mark a significant federal step toward improving safety standards in infant nutrition.

July 11, 2025: FDA Demands Greater Transparency in Infant Formula Recalls Amid Safety Concerns

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a renewed call for increased transparency and communication across the infant and toddler formula industry, following heightened scrutiny over chemical contaminants and recent product recalls.

In a July 10, 2025 announcement, the FDA emphasized the need for “radical transparency” from manufacturers, packers, distributors, importers, and retailers in addressing and communicating risks associated with infant formula.

The agency stressed that protecting vulnerable populations, particularly infants, requires swift and comprehensive public disclosure when contaminated products are identified.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary stated that stakeholders have both a moral and regulatory duty to act in the best interests of consumers, especially when it comes to contaminated baby products.

Deputy Commissioner Kyle Diamantas announced the development of a centralized, consumer-focused recall webpage on FDA.gov, intended to help families quickly access recall information specific to infant formula and toddler foods.

As we’ve covered in the past, Kyle Diamantas is a former corporate lawyer who defended Abbott Laboratories in lawsuits alleging its infant formula increased risk of severe harm to premature babies, and is now leading the FDA’s food division—overseeing the very industry he defended.

His appointment has raised concerns about conflicts of interest, particularly from lawmakers and consumer advocates who question whether a former Abbott defender should be in charge of regulating infant formula safety.

The FDA has requested public input as part of the first comprehensive nutrient review of infant formulas in nearly three decades.

This announcement comes amid increasing reports of toxic substances, such as heavy metals and PFAS, being found in baby food and formula.

Recent third-party testing by consumer advocacy groups has identified trace levels of contaminants in various products currently on the market.

The FDA continues to assess both nutritional adequacy and contaminant risks in formulas, with future regulatory updates and enforcement actions likely as part of the agency’s broader safety reform efforts.

July 8th, 2025: Lead, Arsenic, and Industry Accountability Under Renewed Scrutiny

Mounting evidence continues to reinforce concerns over toxic heavy metals in commercial baby food, as new litigation and regulatory pressure highlight industry-wide failures to protect infant health.

A new multistate letter from 20 state attorneys general, including D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, urges the FDA to reconsider its rejection of a prior citizen petition demanding enforceable heavy metal limits in baby food.

The AGs cited consistent findings of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in top-selling brands—including Gerber, Beech-Nut, HappyBABY, and Earth’s Best—and argued that the FDA’s current “Closer to Zero” timeline lacks urgency and transparency.

The FDA has set non-binding action levels for only two metals so far (lead in juice and inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal), leaving other products and toxins largely unregulated.

According to the House Oversight Report (2021), internal test data from leading manufacturers revealed disturbing contamination:

• Nurture sold products with up to 180 parts per billion (ppb) of inorganic arsenic, 641 ppb of lead, and 10 ppb of mercury.
• Beech-Nut used ingredients testing over 900 ppb arsenic and 886 ppb lead.

As highlighted by WJLA’s I-Team investigation, a new round of independent testing found that 1 in 4 snack or nutrition bars marketed to toddlers contained high lead levels, with 26% of samples exceeding FDA’s proposed limits.

Many parents are unaware that these “healthy” toddler foods are not subject to the same oversight as infant formulas.

Lawsuits filed across the country allege that baby food manufacturers knowingly sold products tainted with neurotoxic metals without disclosing the risk, and plaintiffs seek compensation for long-term neurological harm.

As litigation proceeds, advocacy groups and state officials are demanding faster federal intervention.

With no binding safety standards in place for most baby food categories, regulators and courts will likely play a key role in determining accountability and whether corporate practices rise to the level of negligence.

July 3rd, 2025: Oregon Infants Poisoned by Recalled Target Baby Food 

Two Oregon infants contracted lead poisoning after eating recalled Good & Gather baby food sold at Target, according to the Oregon Health Authority.

Investigators confirmed that both children consumed the Pea, Zucchini, and Kale Thyme Vegetable Puree flavor—one of the products included in a March FDA recall of more than 25,000 units.

The FDA classified the recall as a Class II, indicating the risk of medically reversible but potentially harmful effects.

Although the recall has been officially ended, health officials warn that some homes may still have the affected baby food, which is marked with a best-by date of December 2025.

The OHA emphasized that lead exposure presents severe developmental risks to infants and that symptoms of lead poisoning are often hard to detect without a blood test.

Oregon reported 361 cases of pediatric lead poisoning last year, mostly affecting children under six.

July 1st, 2025: July 2025 JPML Update

The Toxic Baby Food MDL increased from 167 cases in June to 180 in July, adding 13 new filings over the past month.

This steady growth reflects ongoing interest as plaintiffs allege that popular baby food products contained dangerous levels of heavy metals linked to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and ADHD.

The court continues to advance pretrial activity, with discovery orders and expert deadlines helping define the scope of admissible evidence.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys are focused on building scientific support to establish causation and product liability across multiple manufacturers.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

June 25th, 2025: Toxic Heavy Metals Found in Snack Bars Raise Legal and Public Health Alarms

A startling new study funded by the Clean Label Project and conducted by Ellipse Analytics has revealed that nearly all U.S. snack and nutrition bars tested contain toxic heavy metals, prompting concerns about long-term health risks and potential litigation.

Key Findings from the Study

• 98% of snack and nutrition bars tested positive for lead.
• Nearly 22% exceeded California Prop 65 lead limits.
• 98% of bars also tested positive for cadmium, with the lowest quality bars containing over 3 times the heavy metal levels found in the highest quality products.
• Vegan, dairy-free, soy-based, and gluten-free options were not exempt; many showed elevated contamination rates

Health Risks and Regulatory Gaps

Lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury are all associated with neurological disorders, organ damage, and cancer risks, especially for children.

However, there are no federal regulations in the U.S. that comprehensively govern the presence of heavy metals in these food products.

Industry Accountability and Legal Outlook

Consumer advocacy groups are drawing parallels between this contamination and prior baby food scandals involving toxic metals, which have triggered waves of product liability lawsuits.

With snack bars now under similar scrutiny, manufacturers could potentially face legal claims alleging failure to test ingredients and protect consumers from avoidable exposure to toxic substances.

Current litigation focuses on the presence of toxic heavy metals in baby food products, but recent findings have now exposed that other snack foods contain similar toxins.

Heavy metal consumption is especially dangerous for the developing brains and bodies of young children, and lawyers are focused on seeking justice for diagnoses related to baby food first and foremost.

June 12th, 2025: NHS Warns Parents: Baby Food Pouches Do Not Meet Nutrition Standards

The NHS for the United Kingdom has issued new guidance warning parents against using store-bought baby food pouches as regular meals for infants under one year old, citing hidden nutritional risks.

This marks the first time that official UK health advice has directly addressed the widespread reliance on commercial baby food products, particularly those marketed as healthy or suitable from birth.

The advisory follows a BBC Panorama investigation that revealed products from six major UK brands failed to meet essential nutritional standards.

The NHS Start For Life website now advises parents to avoid giving snacks to babies under one year old and to postpone introducing solids until around six months of age, contradicting many labels that promote early weaning.

The guidance also warns that letting children suck directly from pouches may heighten their risk of tooth decay.

Public health advocates welcomed the change, describing it as overdue.

Experts such as Charlotte Stirling-Reed and Dr. Vicky Sibson have criticized misleading marketing and called for stricter government regulations on commercial baby foods.

While the Department of Health asserts that existing laws already establish high standards, campaigners contend that enhanced oversight and more explicit labeling are urgently required.

June 5th, 2025: Baby Food Safety, Press Protections, and Public Defense Measures Advance in Illinois

Three important measures passed in the final hours of Illinois’ legislative session now await Governor JB Pritzker’s signature.

These include new regulations on baby food safety, a statute that expands legal protections for journalists, and legislation to create a statewide public defender’s office.

Senate Bill 73 prohibits the sale of baby food in Illinois if it contains arsenic, cadmium, lead, or mercury above the FDA’s limits.

Manufacturers must test their products monthly, publish the results online, and include a QR code on the packaging that links to toxicity levels and relevant FDA health information.

The bill would take effect on January 1, 2026.

Governor Pritzker has not indicated whether he will sign the measures yet.

June 2nd, 2025: June 2025 JPML Update

The Toxic Baby Food MDL added 11 new cases between May and June, bringing the total to 167.

This is a steady continuation of filings as more families pursue claims alleging heavy metal contamination in commercial baby foods.

As we’ve mentioned, plaintiffs allege that manufacturers knew or should have known that they sold products containing arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury—chemicals linked to developmental disorders in children.

Case activity remains active as discovery and pretrial proceedings continue in the consolidated litigation.If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

May 29, 2025: Deadline Set for Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint in Toxic Baby Food MDL

Defendants in the federal toxic baby food multidistrict litigation (MDL) must respond to the Amended Master Complaint by June 27, 2025, according to a pretrial order issued by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley following a conference on May 22.

Plaintiffs’ opposition briefs are due by July 25, and the reply briefs from manufacturers are due by August 14.

The Amended Master Complaint, filed on April 16, follows an earlier ruling in which the court dismissed claims related to aluminum and infant formula but permitted the core allegations to proceed.

The update reflects revised claims regarding accusations that baby food products sold by companies like Gerber and Beech-Nut exposed children to toxic heavy metals, contributing to diagnoses of autism and ADHD.

The MDL, established in the Northern District of California, now includes over 130 lawsuits stemming from a 2021 Congressional report that identified dangerously high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in popular baby foods.

May 21st, 2025: Publix Recalls GreenWise Baby Food Over Lead Concerns

Publix has voluntarily recalled its GreenWise Pear, Kiwi, Spinach & Pea baby food pouch due to higher lead levels found during routine testing.

The affected four-ounce pouches carry the GTIN 41415-00901 and a ‘best by’ date of November 1, 2025.

No illnesses have been reported, but the company has removed the product from shelves in all eight states where it operates and is providing full refunds to customers.

This marks the second lead-related recall of baby food in recent weeks, following Target’s recall of a similar Good & Gather product in April.

Despite increasing concerns, the FDA has not issued a public warning.

Critics argue that the agency’s silence could diminish the urgency with which retailers and consumers react.

Advocates such as Sarah Sorscher from the Center for Science in the Public Interest argue that FDA alerts lead to quicker action and increased public awareness.

Experts indicate that recent FDA guidance on lead limits in baby food has prompted manufacturers to boost testing and start more recalls.

However, the regulatory momentum may be weakening.

Following public backlash, the FDA recently reversed its plans to shut down a heavy metals testing lab, and the CDC’s lead poisoning prevention program has experienced staffing cuts amid a broader reorganization of the agency.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit involves claims that popular baby food products contain harmful levels of heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and long-term health risks in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about these dangers.

21 cases have been added to the Toxic Baby Food MDL in the past month.

68 cases have been added to the litigation since January 1st.

Exposure to heavy metals during early development can cause irreversible harm, affecting a child’s lifelong health and well-being.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

Two recent federal court rulings in New York have highlighted a growing divide over whether consumers can sue baby food manufacturers over toxic heavy metals in their products—an issue central to the expanding toxic baby food litigation.

On March 19, 2025, a federal judge in the Northern District of New York dismissed a consolidated class action against Beech-Nut, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to allege a sufficient economic injury to establish Article III standing.

The court held that consumers had not plausibly shown they overpaid for the product based on a “price premium theory.”

Just one week later, however, the Southern District of New York reached the opposite conclusion in a case against Nurture, Inc., the maker of Happy Baby Organics.

That court found that the plaintiffs had standing to proceed with most of their claims, including allegations of consumer fraud and violations of California, Illinois, and Minnesota state laws.

The Nurture ruling accepted plaintiffs’ arguments that they would not have paid premium prices for the baby food had they known it contained high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury—an allegation supported by a 2021 congressional report.

The court also rejected preemption arguments, noting that the FDA has yet to finalize limits for toxic metals in baby food.

This split within the New York federal courts underscores an important takeaway: toxic baby food cases may be treated differently depending on the jurisdiction.

While some judges are adopting a stricter standard in line with the Third Circuit, others are applying a more plaintiff-friendly Second Circuit interpretation of economic harm.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether Hain Celestial Group and Whole Foods will face a new trial over claims that their baby food products contributed to a child’s autism. 

The lawsuit stems from allegations that trace levels of heavy metals in Earth’s Best organic baby food caused the plaintiff’s severe autism spectrum disorder.

The case was initially dismissed by a Texas federal judge who ruled that the plaintiffs failed to prove a causal link between the baby food and their child’s condition.

However, the Fifth Circuit reversed that decision, stating that Whole Foods—originally dismissed due to jurisdictional issues—was improperly excluded.

The appellate court ordered the case be returned to Texas state court for a new trial.

Hain Celestial and Whole Foods are now challenging that ruling at the highest level, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s decision creates a dangerous precedent.

If upheld, it would require companies to relitigate cases they already won simply due to procedural errors around jurisdiction.

The companies contend this could open the door to abuse of the legal process and increased burdens on courts and defendants nationwide.

Until the Supreme Court issues a ruling, a new trial in Texas will be paused.

The Court’s decision could significantly shape the legal landscape for ongoing toxic baby food lawsuits across the country.

A Reuters review of newly released test results shows that several leading baby food manufacturers—including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Plum Organics, and Happy Family—are failing to meet California’s strict lead standards under a law enacted January 1, 2025.

Out of 1,757 batches tested, 102 exceeded California’s maximum allowable lead exposure limit of 0.5 micrograms per day for children.

Products with elevated levels included organic sweet potatoes, prunes, and carrots from multiple brands.

While none of the tested batches violated federal limits set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), experts say California’s standards are designed to better protect infants, who are especially vulnerable to the neurological effects of lead exposure.

The findings come as a federal lawsuit involving thousands of families moves forward, alleging that exposure to heavy metals in baby food contributes to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A federal judge recently allowed the claims to proceed, signaling growing legal and public scrutiny.

Companies maintain their products comply with legal limits through batch averaging or long-term consumption assumptions, but critics say those practices may not reflect the real-world risks children face.

Maryland has passed a law similar to California’s, and Illinois is considering one.

More states are expected to act as concern over toxic heavy metals in baby food continues to mount.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Target has issued a nationwide recall of 25,600 units of its Good & Gather Baby Pea, Zucchini, Kale & Thyme Vegetable Puree due to elevated levels of lead, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The recalled product, manufactured by FRUSELVA USA, was distributed to Target stores across the country and affects two specific lot numbers: 4169 (Best by Dec 09, 2025) and 4167 (Best by Dec 07, 2025).

The recall, classified as Class II, suggests a potential for temporary or medically reversible health effects.

While it’s considered a lower-level recall, lead exposure poses significant risks to infants and children—even in small doses.

Chronic lead exposure has been linked to irreversible developmental delays, behavioral problems, and reduced IQ, often without visible symptoms.

Consumers are urged to stop using the affected puree immediately and check packaging against the recalled lot numbers.

This latest recall adds to growing scrutiny of baby food safety, as calls for stricter testing and regulation of heavy metals in infant nutrition continue to gain momentum.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

In a significant development for families pursuing justice over toxic baby food, U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ruled on April 3, 2025, that several major companies must face a nationwide lawsuit alleging that heavy metal contamination in baby food caused neurological damage to children.

The decision allows claims of defective manufacturing, negligence, and failure to warn to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).

The lawsuit targets more than 600 baby food products sold by companies including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Walmart, Hain Celestial, Danone, and others.

Plaintiffs allege these products contained dangerous levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury, contributing to conditions such as autism spectrum disorder and ADHD.

Defendants argued the metals occur naturally and cannot be used to label food as defective, but Judge Corley found the parents had plausibly alleged that some manufacturers failed to follow internal safety standards or ignored contamination risks altogether.

With the court’s ruling, the baby food litigation is poised to enter a critical new phase, increasing pressure on companies to account for decades of manufacturing and marketing practices that may have put children’s health at risk.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit has seen a notable increase in filings from March to April 2025.

In March, the litigation added 101 new cases.

Between March and April, the number of filings increased to 135 cases pending, reflecting an increase of 34 new cases.

This rise indicates continued concern and action from parents and families impacted by toxic substances found in baby food products.

The growth in filings signals the ongoing strength of the litigation as claimants look for justice and compensation for the damage caused by these harmful products.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has launched “Operation Stork Speed,” a sweeping initiative aimed at expanding heavy metal testing in infant formula.

The effort directs the FDA to comprehensively review toxic exposures in baby formula for the first time since 1998 and prioritize the safety of children’s nutrition.

However, the plan clashes with severe FDA staffing cuts under the Trump administration, which include layoffs, buyouts, and terminations of telework arrangements.

Critics warn that without adequate personnel, the FDA may struggle to meet the demands of expanded testing and oversight.

Consumer Reports recently found concerning levels of heavy metals like lead and arsenic in formulas made by Abbott and Reckitt’s Mead Johnson—both of which are currently facing lawsuits over NEC-related injuries and toxic exposures.

Kennedy says the FDA will increase sampling and enforce stricter ingredient scrutiny.

FDA staff and food safety advocates say implementing the plan requires significantly more resources.

Some warn the agency may need double its current workforce to carry out the initiative effectively.

Despite these challenges, the plan is being hailed as a step toward meaningful reform in a system that has long failed to protect infants from contaminated food.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

In a major step toward protecting children’s health, Illinois lawmakers have advanced legislation that would ban the sale and distribution of baby food containing toxic heavy metals.

Senate Bill 73, sponsored by Sen. Laura Fine (D-Glenview), would prohibit the sale of baby food in Illinois that contains arsenic, cadmium, lead, or mercury—metals linked to neurodevelopmental delays and other long-term health risks in children.

Under the proposed law, baby food manufacturers would be required to:

• Test their products monthly for toxic metals
• Disclose the name and level of each detected metal
• Provide a QR code on packaging linking consumers to full testing details and FDA health information

“Many people don’t even know this is an issue,” said Sen. Fine. “When you think you’re doing something healthy for your child, it’s a big wake-up call to find out that it’s actually backfiring.”

The Illinois Department of Public Health would also gain authority to create consumer reporting rules under the measure.

Senate Bill 73 passed unanimously out of the Senate Public Health Committee and now heads to the full Senate for a vote when lawmakers return to Springfield.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A new Consumer Reports investigation has found potentially harmful levels of lead and arsenic in some infant formulas, raising serious concerns about baby food safety.

The testing, which examined 41 different powdered infant formulas, found that most did not pose significant health risks.

However, some contained elevated levels of contaminants, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), bisphenol A (BPA), and acrylamide, all of which have been linked to potential health risks for infants.

Notably, Enfamil’s Nutramigen had the highest lead levels, while Abbott Nutrition’s EleCare Hypoallergenic and Similac Alimentum showed the highest arsenic concentrations.

While formula manufacturers argue that these substances occur naturally in the environment, Consumer Reports is urging federal agencies to take action to ensure safer baby formula.

The FDA and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have announced plans for increased formula testing under Operation Stork Speed, a new initiative aimed at identifying and reducing contaminants in infant nutrition products.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi is pressing newly appointed HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to take immediate action on eliminating toxic heavy metals from baby food.

In a letter dated February 25, 2025, Krishnamoorthi urged Kennedy to prioritize baby food safety and finalize long-overdue regulations on arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

Krishnamoorthi cited his 2021 investigation, which exposed dangerously high levels of lead in major baby food brands—up to 177 times the allowable limit in drinking water.

While the FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative set timelines to address contaminants, progress has been slow, with deadlines repeatedly delayed.

The congressman has requested a briefing from HHS and the FDA by March 15, 2025, to outline a strategic plan for addressing the crisis.

He emphasized the bipartisan urgency of the issue, stating that parents across the country deserve clear answers and stronger protections.

With mounting public pressure and a new administration in place, this push could mark a turning point in efforts to ensure safer baby food regulations

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit involves claims that certain baby food products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health risks in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to disclose these dangers, putting infants at risk.

In February, 92 cases were pending in the Toxic Baby Food MDL.

The number of cases pending has increased to 101 in March, with 9 new claims added.

Heavy metal contamination in baby food can cause irreversible harm, particularly during early childhood development, leading to lifelong health challenges.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

As Congress delays action on toxic heavy metals in baby food, several states are stepping up to protect infants from lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury contamination.

Following California’s lead, Maryland passed “Rudy’s Law”, requiring manufacturers to test baby food and display QR codes for transparency.

The law is named after Rudy Callahan, a toddler who suffered acute lead poisoning from contaminated applesauce pouches.

His mother, Sarah Callahan, continues to advocate for stricter regulations, testifying in multiple states to prevent similar tragedies.

Since Maryland’s move, at least five more states, including Virginia, have introduced similar bills.

Virginia lawmaker Michelle Lopes Maldonado, motivated by her own child’s health struggles, is pushing for greater consumer awareness and accountability from baby food companies.

While federal legislation remains stalled, state action is driving change. QR codes are already appearing on some baby food labels, offering parents greater transparency about what they feed their children.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., plan to reintroduce the Baby Food Safety Act in hopes of setting national standards.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The ongoing concerns regarding toxic heavy metals in baby food have prompted calls for stricter regulations.

Despite the FDA’s recent guidance setting a voluntary limit for lead in baby food, experts and lawmakers are pushing for more immediate and enforceable action to protect children from exposure to harmful substances like cadmium and arsenic.

The 2021 Congressional report revealed alarming findings about the presence of toxic heavy metals, including lead, in baby food from major brands.

The investigation uncovered lead levels in some baby foods as high as 880 parts per billion (ppb), a stark contrast to the FDA’s newly proposed guideline of 10 ppb. 

The report highlighted the failure of both the food industry and the FDA to address the risks posed by these substances, raising serious concerns about the safety of products marketed to infants.

The Baby Food Safety Act aims to establish mandatory standards for heavy metals in all baby foods, addressing the long-standing issue of unsafe food ingredients.

With states like California and Maryland taking matters into their own hands, the fight for safer baby food continues.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit involves claims that certain baby food products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health risks in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to disclose these dangers, putting infants at risk.

88 cases were pending in the Toxic Baby Food MDL at the beginning of the year, increasing to 92 in February, with 4 new claims added.

This steady rise reflects growing awareness among parents about the potential dangers of heavy metal exposure in baby food.

Heavy metal contamination in baby food can cause irreversible harm, particularly during early childhood development, leading to lifelong health challenges.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A 2021 congressional report revealed that over 90% of tested baby food products contained heavy metals, with rice-based products and sweet potato snacks showing the highest contamination levels.

Consumer Reports also found similar results in independent testing.

In response, a 2024 California law now mandates that baby food manufacturers test for these metals at least once a month and publicly disclose results on their websites.

Companies must also provide QR codes on packaging for easy consumer access.

Advocacy groups, including Consumer Reports and Unleaded Kids, have pressured manufacturers to comply with stricter safety measures.

However, only a few companies, including Plum Organics and Once Upon a Farm, have voluntarily shared 2024 test results.

Health experts warn that long-term exposure to heavy metals in baby food can lead to developmental delays, lower IQ, and other neurological issues in young children.

To minimize exposure, experts recommend avoiding rice-based products, limiting fruit juice intake, and incorporating a variety of fresh whole foods into a baby’s diet.

The FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative aims to set maximum allowable heavy metal levels in baby food, but full implementation remains years away.

How Families Can Minimize Heavy Metal Exposure

1. Avoid Rice-Based Baby Foods – Rice absorbs more arsenic than other grains. Replace rice cereals and snacks with oat, barley, quinoa, or millet-based alternatives.
2. Limit Processed Baby Snacks – Puffs, teething biscuits, and other processed baby snacks often contain higher metal levels. Opt for whole foods instead.
3. Reduce Fruit Juice Consumption – Many fruit juices contain lead and arsenic. Offer fresh fruit or water instead of juice.
4. Choose a Variety of Whole Foods – A diverse diet with different fruits, vegetables, proteins, and grains helps balance nutrient intake and reduces reliance on high-risk foods.
5. Check Baby Food Test Results – A new California law requires baby food manufacturers to test and disclose heavy metal levels monthly. Scan QR codes on packaging or visit company websites to review safety data.
6. Buy from Trusted Brands – Only a few companies, including Plum Organics and Once Upon a Farm, have voluntarily shared 2024 test results. Choose brands committed to transparency.
7. Stay Informed About FDA Regulations – The FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative aims to limit heavy metals in baby food, but full implementation is still in progress.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Illinois lawmakers are considering a groundbreaking bill aimed at banning the sale and distribution of baby food containing toxic heavy metals like arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury.

Senate Bill 73, introduced by Sen. Laura Fine (D-Glenview), would require manufacturers to test their products for these harmful substances and disclose detailed information to both consumers and the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH).

Key Provisions of the Bill:

• Mandatory Testing: Baby food manufacturers would be required to test for toxic heavy metals and report results to the IDPH.
• Consumer Transparency: Starting January 1, 2027, manufacturers would need to disclose the type and levels of heavy metals in their products, along with batch and lot numbers, using both packaging labels and QR codes.
• Consumer Reporting: The proposed legislation would empower Illinois residents to report toxic baby food directly to the IDPH.

The bill seeks to combat the long-term health risks posed by heavy metals in baby food, which can lead to developmental delays, neurological damage, and other serious conditions in children.

“When you think you’re doing something healthy for your child, it’s a wake-up call to learn it could be harmful,” Sen. Fine emphasized.

If passed, this legislation would make Illinois one of the first states to take independent action to regulate toxic heavy metals in baby food, bypassing federal delays.

The bill is expected to be assigned to a Senate committee when lawmakers return to Springfield in the coming weeks.

Advocates hope it will set a precedent for other states and push manufacturers toward greater accountability and safer practices.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

As part of its Closer to Zero initiative, the FDA has issued final guidance setting strict action levels for lead in processed foods intended for babies and young children.

Effective January 6, 2025, these action levels are:

• 10 parts per billion (ppb) for fruits, vegetables (excluding single-ingredient root vegetables), mixtures, yogurts, custards, and single-ingredient meats.
• 20 ppb for single-ingredient root vegetables and dry infant cereals.

These thresholds aim to minimize lead exposure while maintaining access to nutritious baby food.

The FDA will use these action levels to determine if food may be considered adulterated under federal law.

This guidance builds on the Closer to Zero initiative, a science-based approach to reducing contaminants like lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury in food for babies and young children.

The initiative includes ongoing research, enforcement, and collaboration with stakeholders to drive continual improvement in food safety.

The FDA emphasizes that parents should focus on providing children with a diverse, nutrient-dense diet.

Meanwhile, manufacturers are expected to adopt control measures to achieve these action levels and reduce toxic contaminants in baby food products over time.

This landmark action represents a critical step in improving food safety and protecting the health of vulnerable populations.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit addresses claims that certain baby food products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health issues in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to disclose these risks, putting infants at significant harm.

In December, 75 cases were pending in the Toxic Baby Food MDL.

The number of pending cases has increased to 88 in January 2025, with 13 new claims added.

Heavy metals in baby food can cause irreversible harm, particularly during critical stages of development, posing lifelong challenges for affected children.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

Hain Celestial Group faces a proposed class action alleging its Earth’s Best Baby Food products contained arsenic levels exceeding recognized safe thresholds.

U.S. District Judge Nina Morrison ruled that the claims regarding arsenic are material to consumer decisions about purchasing baby food labeled as healthy and safe.

The court dismissed similar claims related to lead, cadmium, and mercury, citing the lack of established safety benchmarks for these metals in baby food.

This lawsuit follows a 2021 report by a U.S. House subcommittee highlighting “dangerous” levels of heavy metals in baby food.

Companies like Beech-Nut, Gerber, and Walmart are facing similar litigation.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

If you suspect your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

California’s Assembly Bill 899 (AB 899), effective January 1, 2025, introduces stricter regulations for baby food manufacturers, requiring comprehensive testing for heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

The law also mandates clear product labeling and public reporting to enhance consumer awareness and reduce exposure risks.

The Clean Label Project (CLP), a nonprofit organization focused on product safety and transparency, has launched educational initiatives to support compliance with AB 899 and inform families about the risks of heavy metal exposure in baby foods.

CLP’s efforts include consumer education campaigns, healthcare provider resources, and testing programs for manufacturers.

Key Requirements of AB 899:

• Comprehensive Testing: Rigorous assessments for harmful heavy metals.
• Clear Labeling: Detailed product labels outlining safety information.
• Public Reporting: Transparency through accessible manufacturer compliance reports.

A recent survey revealed that while most parents are concerned about heavy metals in baby food, only 44% are aware of AB 899.

Advocates, including CLP and the Count on Mothers organization, emphasize the importance of educating families and holding manufacturers accountable.

This legislation could impact ongoing lawsuits against baby food companies accused of exposing children to harmful heavy metals without proper disclosure.

AB 899 sets a precedent for future regulatory standards and may influence outcomes in litigation related to contaminated products.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

If you suspect your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

​​A status conference was held today as part of the ongoing litigation, with several key agenda items addressed:

• Discovery Requirements: Plaintiffs identified the discovery needed from parent defendants and Walmart’s co-manufacturers for general causation proceedings.

• Expert Discovery Schedule: Discussions focused on establishing a timeline for expert discovery.

• Plaintiff Fact Sheets: The parties were given a deadline to submit competing proposals for initial Plaintiff fact sheets.

• Loyalty Program Information: Plaintiffs agreed to produce loyalty program data to the defendants.

• Discovery Disputes: A deadline was set for submitting a joint letter addressing disputes related to defendants’ interrogatory responses.

• Page Limits: Page limits were defined for future case management conference statements.

• Rescheduling Future Conferences: The May 29, 2025, case management conference was rescheduled to May 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.

This conference helps streamline key discovery and procedural steps as the litigation progresses.

Further updates will follow as new deadlines and rulings are implemented.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit centers on claims that certain baby food products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

Toxic heavy metals in baby food have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive issues, and other serious health risks in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to inform consumers about these potential dangers, putting infants at risk.

In November, 52 cases were filed, rising to 75 in December, with 23 new claims added.

This increase highlights growing recognition of the health issues linked to the device.

These complications can lead to significant medical challenges, requiring interventions and affecting the quality of life of those relying on the device for essential treatment.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

If you suspect your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food multidistrict litigation (MDL), established in April 2024, is advancing with a clear timeline over the next year.

U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley, who presides over the Toxic Baby Food MDL, recently outlined important deadlines for pretrial proceedings. Key Dates in the Litigation Include: 

• February 6, 2025: Deadline for submitting motion to dismiss (MTD) briefing.
• February 27, 2025: Oral arguments on the motion to dismiss.
• April 2025: Expert discovery is set to begin.
• December 2025: Oral arguments on Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony.
• Early 2026: Rulings on Daubert motions, which will determine whether the expert evidence is admissible.

Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits depend on surviving Daubert scrutiny, which assesses the reliability of expert testimony.

If the evidence passes, the cases could proceed to trial or settlement discussions within 15-18 months.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit centers on claims that certain baby food products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

Toxic heavy metals in baby food have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive issues, and other serious health risks in children.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to inform consumers about these potential dangers, putting infants at risk.

In October, the lawsuit had 32 filings, which increased to 52 in November, adding 20 new cases.

This increase indicates growing awareness among parents and caregivers about the risks associated with heavy metal contamination in baby food.

Heavy metals can cause irreversible harm, particularly to children in critical stages of development.

Exposure to these toxic substances can lead to cognitive impairments, learning disabilities, and other long-term health effects.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit involves claims that several major baby food brands contain dangerous levels of heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These harmful substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health issues in children.

The lawsuit asserts that manufacturers failed to disclose these risks, putting countless infants at risks of exposure to toxic chemicals.

In September, the number of cases filed in the Toxic Baby Food MDL was 30, and by October, it had risen to 32.

Heavy metals, like those found in the food products at issue, can cause serious harm to children.

Exposure to these substances during critical developmental stages has been associated with long-term health problems, including learning disabilities and behavioral issues.

Arsenic, for example, is known to affect brain development, while lead exposure can damage a child’s nervous system, resulting in irreversible cognitive deficits.

Further reports from school lunch tests have revealed that the problem of toxic metals in food extends beyond baby products, as alarming levels of pesticides and heavy metals were also found in meals served to children in public schools.

This highlights a widespread issue that continues to affect young and vulnerable populations, with dangerous chemicals and toxins remaining in the food supply chain despite their proven health risks.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

In a recent development regarding the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit, the Fifth Circuit Court denied Whole Foods and Hain Celestial Group request for rehearing in a lawsuit filed by parents of a toddler who allegedly suffered physical and mental health issues due to toxic metals in baby food.

The parents originally filed the lawsuit in state court, but the companies moved the case to federal court.

However, the court decided that the case should go back to state court because the parents provided enough clarification about their claims that the baby food may have been harmful.

This means the case will continue in state court where it was first filed.

These plaintiffs will have another opportunity to present their evidence and claims in state court, and the case will be reevaluated from the start, as though it had never been moved to federal court.

The case will essentially be retried or reconsidered in state court, where a new decision will be made on the merits of their claims.

U.S. District Judge Corley is overseeing the consolidation of lawsuits against major baby food manufacturers like Gerber and Beech-Nut, where families allege that toxic metals in the food caused autism and ADHD.

The court ordered manufacturers to turn over testing data for 600 products between 2012 and 2021, including ingredient and final product details to better evaluate the claims. 

This means that the companies involved, like Gerber and Beech-Nut, must provide extensive data on their products.

By turning over the testing results, including information on toxic metal levels in both ingredients and final products, the court aims to better assess the claims that toxic metals in baby food caused autism and ADHD.

This is critical for plaintiffs because the data could reveal what the manufacturers knew about the presence of heavy metals in their products and when they knew it.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

If you suspect your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit has seen a slight increase in case filings, rising from 28 in August to 30 in September.

Recent studies reveal that nearly 95% of baby food sold in stores contains trace levels of heavy metals.

These heavy metals include lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

The issue is complex, as homemade baby food is not necessarily safer, and parents lack reliable tools to detect these contaminants.

The FDA has initiated the “Closer to Zero” plan to reduce heavy metals in baby food, but there is criticism about the effectiveness and speed of these efforts.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

In the latest status conference for the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) concerning toxic heavy metals in baby food, the court issued several significant orders:

1. Production of Heavy Metal Test Results: The defendants are required to produce test results for heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, mercury, and cadmium, in baby food ingredients and final products from 2012 to 2021.

This order aligns with findings from a 2021 congressional subcommittee report that revealed alarmingly high levels of these metals in various baby foods. The court also mandated the production of product formulas from the same period.

The study, which analyzed over 600 infant and toddler food products, found that approximately two-thirds of these products do not meet the health standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO).

1. Water Test Results: In addition to food ingredients, the defendants must provide test results for heavy metals in the water used during baby food manufacturing for the 2012-2021 period.
2. Identification of Third-Party Co-Manufacturers: The defendants are ordered to identify any third-party co-manufacturers involved in producing baby food products during the specified period. Defendants who lack sufficient test data must also disclose their suppliers.
3. Evidence Preservation: By September 12, 2024, each defendant must submit a document detailing the steps taken for evidence preservation, including the implementation of litigation holds.
4. ESI Protocol: The parties are to submit an agreed-upon protocol for electronically stored information (ESI) by September 19, 2024. Any areas of disagreement must also be outlined, along with the respective arguments.
5. Future Case Management Conferences: The court has scheduled additional case management conferences for September 26, 2024, November 7, 2024, and December 12, 2024.

The next status conference is expected by September 24, 2024

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

A recent study published in the journal Nutrients reveals concerning findings regarding the nutritional quality of baby foods sold in the United States.

The study, which analyzed over 600 infant and toddler food products available in the top 10 U.S. grocery store chains, found that approximately two-thirds of these products do not meet the health standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Specifically, 70% of the products failed to meet the protein requirements established by the WHO, and 25% did not satisfy calorie recommendations. 

Furthermore, 44% of the baby foods examined exceeded the recommended sugar content, with 74% containing added sugars or sweeteners. 

The study also highlighted that all products analyzed made at least one claim on their packaging that did not align with WHO standards.

This study’s findings add another layer to the news surrounding contaminants in baby food products sold in supermarkets across the country.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit, centralized into Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California, addresses the concerns about toxic heavy metal contamination in popular baby food products.

The litigation, overseen by The Honorable Jacqueline Corley, has been progressing steadily, with over 30 lawsuits filed.

The core issue in this litigation revolves around the potential harm caused by toxic substances in baby foods and the failure of manufacturers to meet established health standards.

At a recent Case Management Conference, the central dispute concerned the scope of Plaintiffs’ discovery requests.

Plaintiffs seek comprehensive information on testing and safety protocols, which they argue is critical to their case.

Defendants, unsurprisingly, contend that these requests are overly broad.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

The Master Long-Form Complaint has been filed in the filed Baby Food Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3101), centralized in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

The Master Complaint serves as a comprehensive document that provides a unified set of allegations and claims that individual plaintiffs can adopt in their cases.

This allows for a more streamlined and organized litigation process in addressing the widespread concerns over contaminated baby food products.

The plaintiffs allege that major baby food manufacturers knowingly sold baby food contaminated with toxic heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and aluminum.

These contaminants are linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children.

The complaint details the severe impact on their health and the economic burden placed on their families, it also outlines the relationships between these entities and their roles in the production and distribution of the contaminated products.

The complaint highlights growing concerns over the presence of toxic heavy metals in baby foods, citing studies and reports, including a Congressional investigation that found significant levels of these metals in products sold by the defendants.

The defendants are accused of engaging in a pattern of selling contaminated baby foods and failing to reduce metal levels, despite knowing the potential risks.

The lawsuit alleges that defendants set dangerously high internal limits for toxic metals or failed to set any limits at all, allowed contaminated ingredients to be used, and did not adequately test finished products.

The claims include:

• Failure to Warn: Defendants did not adequately inform consumers of the presence of toxic heavy metals in their products.
• Manufacturing Defects: The products were defective due to the presence of these toxic substances, which made them unsafe for consumption by infants.
• Design Defects: The design of the baby foods was inherently unsafe due to the use of contaminated ingredients.

Several major baby food manufacturers and their parent companies have been named in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Many of these baby food companies were included in the Congressional investigation, but others named in this case refused participation in the 2021 investigation.

Defendants Named in the Lawsuit:

• Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
• Campbell Soup Company
• Danone S.A.
• Gerber Products Company
• Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
• Hero A.G.
• Neptune Wellness Solutions
• Nestlé Holdings, Inc.
• Nurture, LLC
• Plum, PBC
• Sprout Foods, Inc.
• Sun-Maid Growers of California
• Walmart, Inc.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

Recent testing by Consumer Reports has found alarmingly high levels of lead in snack puffs for children, particularly those containing cassava root.

This discovery highlights ongoing concerns about lead contamination in baby foods and underscores the need for stringent regulatory action by the FDA.

Consumer Reports tested four snacks from brands Lesser Evil and Serenity Kids, all containing cassava root.

The report found that contamination in these baby foods surpasses levels found in any of the 80 baby foods tested since 2017.

Tom Neltner, National Director of Unleaded Kids, emphasized the need for rigorous testing and careful sourcing due to the ability of root crops to absorb heavy metals like lead from the soil.

He criticized the FDA for its failure to set enforceable limits on heavy metals in baby foods, despite its Closer to Zero program.

The agency has missed multiple deadlines and recently indicated that guidelines may be available by the end of the year.

The FDA stated it is gathering information on lead exposure from snack foods to determine the best regulatory approach. 

Neltner and other experts argue that existing scientific consensus on the dangers of lead exposure to children should suffice for immediate action.

The discovery of high lead levels in popular snack puffs could strengthen claims against manufacturers and increase pressure on the FDA to implement stringent regulations.

Parents and advocates continue to push for comprehensive and enforceable standards to protect children from toxic contaminants in their food.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

In April 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized the Toxic Baby Food (MDL 3101) in the Northern District of California before Judge Corley.

Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have recognized these metals as hazardous to children’s health, noting that even low levels of exposure can lead to neurological disorders and other serious health issues.

A report from the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform revealed that several commercial baby food manufacturers knowingly sold products containing unsafe levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury.

Defendants named in the Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuits include Beech-Nut, Hain (Earth’s Best Organic), Gerber, and Nurture Inc.

Consumption of baby foods contaminated with heavy metals can significantly impair children’s cognitive and behavioral development, causing long-term challenges for them and their families.

This MDL, currently with under 30 pending lawsuits, is progressing steadily.

Key upcoming dates include:

• July 15, 2024: Deadline for the Master Complaint.
• September 16, 2024: Deadline for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (MTD).
• October 28, 2024: Deadline for Opposition to MTD.
• November 18, 2024: Deadline for Reply to Opposition.

A ruling on the Motion to Dismiss is expected before the end of 2024.

Additionally, a related Baby Food case in California state court is set for trial in January 2025.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our Lawyers.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing and TorHoerman Law is actively accepting new clients. 

Plaintiffs now have the option to file their cases directly in the Baby Food Heavy Metals Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to avoid delays associated with case transfers.

This direct filing procedure aims to expedite the process for plaintiffs, allowing for quicker handling of cases alleging personal injuries due to exposure to toxic heavy metals in baby food products.

Heavy metal exposures are linked to conditions such as autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, among other potential neurological issues.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

Popular baby food products by manufacturers like Gerber, Beech-Nut, and others have been found to contain toxic heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, mercury, and cadmium.

This contamination poses serious health risks to children and is linked to autism and ADHD.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established a federal MDL in April 2024, centralizing the cases in the Northern District of California under U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley.

The litigation is expected to culminate with a series of early “bellwether” trials to gauge jury responses to evidence and testimony.

During a status conference, lawyers will discuss the scope of expert proceedings to establish whether toxic baby food caused the alleged conditions.

The parties disagree on whether multi-plaintiff complaints should be allowed and how to handle general causation questions related to the toxicity of heavy metals in baby food.

Judge Corley’s approval of the direct filing requests will streamline the process for filing new lawsuits, reduce delays, and standardize information gathering.

The first trial for a toxic baby food lawsuit in California state court is scheduled for January 21, 2025.

If you or a loved one have experienced serious side effects from heavy metals in baby food, you may be eligible to take action and file a baby food autism Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a toxic baby food Lawsuit and to get in touch with a licensed lawyer.

A new bill introduced in the U.S. Congress aims to limit harmful heavy metals found in baby food through stronger regulation and enforcement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This legislation comes in response to multiple reports highlighting dangerous levels of contaminants in baby and toddler foods.

Heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury pose significant health risks, especially to infants and toddlers.

These neurotoxins can cause permanent damage to developing brains, leading to long-term intellectual and behavioral problems.

According to a 2019 report by Healthy Babies Bright Futures, 95% of baby foods from major manufacturers contained lead, and a quarter of the foods contained all four heavy metals.

A 2021 House Subcommittee investigation found levels of heavy metals in baby food far exceeding limits set for bottled water.

The Baby Food Safety Act of 2024, introduced by Senators Amy Klobuchar, Tammy Duckworth, and Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi and Tony Cárdenas, directs the FDA to establish maximum allowable limits for toxic heavy metals in baby food.

The bill mandates testing of final food products and grants the FDA authority to enforce these standards, including mandating recalls for non-compliant products.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf supports the bill, requesting Congress to provide the FDA with similar oversight authority for food manufacturers as it has for drug manufacturers.

The agency’s Closer to Zero initiative aims to reduce childhood exposure to environmental contaminants, but advocates argue that more stringent regulations are urgently needed.

Plaintiffs in the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) centralized in the Northern District of California allege that exposure to heavy metals in baby food has caused autism and ADHD in children.

The new bill, if passed, would enhance regulatory oversight and potentially support the plaintiffs’ claims by establishing stricter contamination limits and enforcement mechanisms.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Baby Food Autism Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The FDA is investigating more instances of heavy metals in baby food after reports of acute lead toxicity in children in multiple states.

This investigation began following cases linked to WanaBana’s apple cinnamon fruit pouches, prompting widespread recalls.

Initial reports from North Carolina health officials revealed acute lead toxicity in four children, expanding to over 82 cases nationwide, including significant incidents in Illinois.

Consumer reports found high levels of lead, mercury, and arsenic in various baby food products.

Exposure to high levels of lead can cause severe developmental delays and behavioral issues, which are concerns often associated with autism spectrum disorders.

Pediatricians stress the importance of reducing lead exposure to prevent long-term health problems.

The FDA’s Closer to Zero plan aims to set limits for heavy metals in baby food.

Draft guidelines are expected by the end of the year, with immediate actions against non-compliant products.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Maryland lawmakers propose “Rudy’s Law” to address the presence of toxic heavy metals in baby food.

This legislation mandates monthly testing and disclosure of results by manufacturers, setting higher standards than current FDA regulations.

“Rudy’s Law” is named after a toddler who suffered lead poisoning from contaminated baby food.

The bill aims to prevent similar incidents by ensuring rigorous safety checks, reflecting growing state-level actions amidst slow federal progress.

Exposure to heavy metals like lead poses significant risks to children, including developmental delays and behavioral issues often associated with autism.

Pediatric experts stress that no level of heavy metal exposure is safe for children.

Maryland joins other states in implementing stricter baby food safety measures.

The proposed law requires transparency from manufacturers, providing consumers with crucial information to make informed choices.

If your child or a loved one’s child was diagnosed with Autism or other disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

California is set to lead the way in enhancing the safety of infant formula and baby foods with the potential signing of CA AB 899 by Governor Gavin Newsom.

This bill mandates that manufacturers test for toxic elements like lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, and make the results publicly available.

The move follows ongoing concerns about contamination and inadequate federal oversight.

The new bill requires manufacturers to test their products for heavy metals and disclose the results.

Heavy metals like lead and mercury pose significant risks to infants, causing severe health issues.

Currently, there are no federal requirements for manufacturers to report contamination of baby foods and formula, highlighting a gap in regulatory oversight.

Lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury are toxic even in small amounts, particularly to children under five, exposure can lead to developmental delays, neurological disorders, and other severe health issues.

The FDA’s new guidance aims to improve safety but lacks the authority to mandate contamination reporting without congressional approval.

California’s proposed law could set a precedent for nationwide standards, ensuring safer baby food and formula.

Parents and caregivers are advised to stay informed about recalls and follow CDC guidelines for safe handling and storage of baby formula.

Our law firm is currently accepting clients for Toxic Baby Food cases.

If your child developed complications after consuming these products, you and your family could be eligible to file a baby food contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify for the Baby Food Lawsuit, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

New tests by Consumer Reports reveal ongoing concerns about heavy metals in baby foods, including arsenic, lead, and cadmium.

While some products have shown reductions in certain heavy metals, the overall risk remains high.

The analysis tested 14 products, focusing on items with previously identified risks.

Key Findings Include:

• Products Tested: Fruits, vegetables, meals, entrees, and snacks like bars, puffs, and teething wafers.
• Heavy Metal Levels: Some products showed decreases in heavy metals, while others saw increases, balancing out overall risk.
• Problematic Foods: Rice and sweet potatoes continue to pose significant risks. Baby snacks, particularly rice-based puffs, remain highly contaminated.

Responses from manufacturers highlight ongoing efforts to test ingredients and final products, but the industry still faces challenges in reducing heavy metal levels.

Long-term intake of heavy metals may increase the risk of a variety of health and developmental problems in young children, including a lower IQ and behavioral issues, as well as ADHD, autism, and other issues.

The FDA has proposed new limits, yet these are not finalized and do not cover all baby food categories.

The need for stricter standards and regulatory oversight is emphasized to ensure safer baby food products and reduce long-term health risks for children.

Our law firm is currently accepting clients for Toxic Baby Food cases.

If your child developed complications after consuming these products, you and your family could be eligible to file a baby food contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify for the Baby Food Lawsuit, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

A recent study in the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics highlights a significant increase in the number of American children needing special education services, with autism and ADHD rates notably rising.

Led by Dr. Renee Dufault of the Food Ingredient and Health Research Institute, the study found a 10.4% increase in children receiving special education services between 2006 and 2021. Autism cases tripled from 4% to 11%, while ADHD cases rose from 10% to 16%.

Dr. Dufault’s team reviewed literature on epigenetic factors influencing autism and ADHD, identifying dietary heavy metal exposures and poor nutrition as primary contributors.

Heavy metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, often found in baby foods, were highlighted as significant risk factors.

The U.S. Congress reported in 2021 that many baby foods contain dangerous levels of these metals, potentially exacerbating autism and ADHD development.

The study underscores the importance of addressing dietary exposures to mitigate rising rates of these conditions in children.

Our law firm is currently accepting clients for Toxic Baby Food cases.

If your child developed complications after consuming these products, you and your family could be eligible to file a baby food contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify for the Baby Food Lawsuit, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The FDA is investigating heavy metals in baby food after reports revealed arsenic, mercury, and cadmium in popular brands like Happy Baby, Beseech Nut, and Gerber.

This investigation follows the 2021 U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform Report.

Exposure to heavy metals can cause significant risks to children, including developmental delays and behavioral issues linked to autism.

These risks are particularly high for children under two years old, affecting brain and neural development, and potentially increasing cancer risks.

The FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative aims to set new limits for heavy metals in baby food.

New guidelines limit lead concentrations to 10 parts per billion in baby food and 20 parts per billion in dry cereals, potentially reducing lead exposure by 24-27%

Our law firm is currently accepting clients for Toxic Baby Food cases.

If your child developed complications after consuming these products, you and your family could be eligible to file a baby food contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify for the Baby Food Lawsuit, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The FDA has proposed new guidelines to limit lead levels in baby food, highlighting a significant health concern for infants and young children.

Lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury have been found in various baby food products, posing risks to child development.

The FDA’s draft guidance sets maximum lead levels at:

• 10 parts per billion (ppb) for most fruits, vegetables, mixtures, yogurts, custards, puddings, and single-ingredient meats
• 20 ppb for root vegetables and dry infant cereals

These proposed limits aim to reduce lead exposure by 24-27% in baby foods, contributing to better health outcomes for children under two years old.

Heavy metals can enter baby food through contaminated soil and water, often a result of past pesticide use and industrial activities.

Plants, particularly root vegetables like potatoes and carrots, absorb these metals more readily.

Rice products are also prone to higher levels of arsenic.

Exposure to heavy metals can cause severe health issues in children, including neurological defects, developmental delays, and behavioral problems.

The FDA’s initiative seeks to mitigate these risks by setting stricter limits on heavy metals in baby food.

The proposed action levels are not mandatory but could lead to FDA enforcement actions against non-compliant manufacturers.

This proposal follows previous FDA efforts to limit inorganic arsenic in rice cereal and lead in juices.

The FDA will finalize these guidelines after a 60-day public comment period, seeking to implement sustainable reductions in heavy metal exposure in baby food products.

Our law firm is currently accepting clients for Toxic Baby Food cases.

If your child developed complications after consuming these products, you and your family could be eligible to file a baby food contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify for the Baby Food Lawsuit, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.