Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

History of Depo-Provera and Lawsuits Against Depo-Provera Manufacturers [2025 Guide]

What is the History of Depo-Provera and What Does the Depo-Provera Lawsuit Claim?

Depo-Provera, an injectable contraceptive containing the synthetic hormone medroxyprogesterone acetate, has been widely used for decades despite ongoing concerns about its long-term health risks.

Lawsuits against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, have emerged, alleging that the company failed to warn users about the increased risk of brain tumors and other serious health complications linked to prolonged use.

On this page, we’ll discuss the History of Depo-Provera, the current Depo Provera Lawsuit filed against Pfizer, potential health risks linked to Depo-Provera injections, and much more.

A Brief History of the Injectable Contraceptive Depo-Provera

Depo-Provera was first developed in the 1950s by Upjohn (now part of Pfizer) as a high-dose synthetic progestin intended for use in cancer treatment before researchers discovered its effectiveness as a contraceptive.

Despite concerns about potential health risks, the drug was approved for birth control in numerous countries before gaining FDA approval in the United States in 1992.

Regulatory agencies initially hesitated due to studies suggesting links between Depo-Provera and bone density loss, breast cancer, and other long-term side effects.

Once approved, the injectable contraceptive became widely prescribed, particularly for women seeking a low-maintenance birth control option, with millions of doses administered worldwide each year.

However, concerns about its safety persisted, particularly regarding the effects of prolonged exposure to medroxyprogesterone acetate, its active ingredient.

Recent studies have identified a significant correlation between prolonged Depo-Provera use and an increased risk of developing intracranial meningiomas, a type of brain tumor.

This has led to a growing number of Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits against Pfizer, alleging that the company failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about these risks.

As investigations into Depo-Provera’s safety intensify, legal action is being pursued to hold the manufacturer accountable for potential failures in disclosing known health hazards.

Our lawyers are currently investigating the new Depo-Provera Lawsuit and accepting new clients.

History of Depo-Provera and Lawsuits Against Depo-Provera Manufacturers; The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors; Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit; Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit; Potential Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit; TorHoerman Law_ Accepting Clients for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit

If you or a loved one developed brain tumors after prolonged use of Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact the Depo Provera Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify to join the countless women pursuing legal action through the Depo-Provera Litigation.

A brain tumor diagnosis can drastically alter a woman’s life, leading to debilitating symptoms, invasive medical treatments, and lasting neurological damage that affects daily functioning, employment, and overall well-being.

Studies now show that prolonged use of the contraceptive drug Depo-Provera is linked to a significantly increased risk of developing intracranial meningiomas, leaving many women facing unexpected and life-changing health consequences.

Our lawyers are here to help those affected seek justice, hold Pfizer accountable, and pursue the compensation they deserve for the harm caused by this dangerous drug.

Reach out to us today.

Table of Contents

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera

Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) is a long-acting progestin contraceptive injection developed by Upjohn, a pharmaceutical company that later became part of Pfizer.

Originally formulated in the 1950s, medroxyprogesterone acetate was initially studied for potential use in treating endometrial and renal cancers due to its anti-proliferative effects on hormone-sensitive tissues.

However, researchers quickly recognized its ability to suppress ovulation and prevent pregnancy by inhibiting gonadotropin secretion, leading Upjohn to explore its use as a contraceptive.

Upjohn first sought U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for Depo-Provera as a contraceptive in the late 1960s, but the request was denied due to concerns about potential long-term health risks.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera

The primary reason for rejection was animal studies showing a link between medroxyprogesterone acetate and an increased risk of breast and endometrial cancers.

Despite these concerns, Depo-Provera gained approval in several international markets, including France in 1969 and later in developing countries, where it was widely promoted for population control efforts.

1992: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval

Upjohn continued pushing for U.S. approval throughout the 1970s, filing additional applications with the FDA in 1978 and 1983.

Each time, the FDA rejected the drug due to safety concerns, particularly over its potential carcinogenic effects and the risk of bone density loss.

However, in 1992—under mounting pressure from global health organizations and with additional safety studies in hand—the FDA finally approved Depo-Provera as an injectable contraceptive in the U.S.

The approval was controversial, as lingering concerns remained regarding its long-term safety profile, particularly for younger women who might use the drug for extended periods.

Medical Use and Long-Term Safety Concerns of Receiving Depo-Provera Injections

Depo-Provera became widely used due to its effectiveness and convenience, requiring only one injection every three months to prevent pregnancy.

By the early 2000s, millions of women worldwide were using Depo-Provera, with many health providers prescribing it as a first-line contraceptive option.

However, post-market surveillance studies and long-term clinical research began raising concerns about the drug’s safety.

In particular, studies linked Depo-Provera to significant bone mineral density loss, leading the FDA to issue a black box warning in 2004 cautioning against prolonged use beyond two years.

Further concerns emerged regarding its neurological and endocrine effects, particularly its influence on progesterone receptors in the brain.

While the drug was primarily marketed for contraception, it was also prescribed off-label for conditions such as endometriosis and menstrual suppression.

However, scientific research began drawing attention to the potential for high-dose progestins, like medroxyprogesterone acetate, to contribute to abnormal cell growth in hormone-sensitive tissues—including the meninges, the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

2024 Scientific Study: Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors

A groundbreaking study published in The British Medical Journal (BMJ) in March 2024 has revealed compelling evidence that prolonged Depo-Provera usage significantly increases the risk of developing intracranial meningiomas—tumors that form on the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

This study is one of the most comprehensive investigations to date examining the correlation between synthetic progestins and meningioma development, providing a statistical risk assessment that has fueled growing legal scrutiny and regulatory concerns surrounding Depo-Provera.

The BMJ study analyzed extensive patient data sourced from the French National Health Data System, a robust and centralized database tracking medical histories, prescription records, and health outcomes.

Researchers identified over 18,000 cases of women who had undergone surgery for meningiomas and compared their medical records with 90,000 control subjects to assess differences in contraceptive use.

The study focused specifically on women who had used synthetic progestins, including medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the active ingredient in Depo-Provera.

Key risk factors—including age, duration of contraceptive use, and cumulative exposure to high-dose progestins—were carefully analyzed.

The findings demonstrated a direct dose-response relationship between prolonged Depo-Provera use and an increased likelihood of developing meningiomas, meaning that the longer a woman used the Depo shot, the higher her risk of developing a brain tumor.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors

Key Findings from the 2024 BMJ Study:

  • A 550% Increased Risk of Meningiomas: Women who used Depo-Provera were 5.5 times more likely to develop an intracranial meningioma compared to non-users. This odds ratio (OR) of 5.55 is among the highest risk correlations seen in pharmaceutical litigation.
  • Long-Term Use Raises Risk Significantly: The study found that prolonged exposure (more than one year) dramatically increased tumor development, with even greater risk for women who had used Depo-Provera for several years.
  • Strong Association with High-Dose Progestins: While other hormonal contraceptives were examined, the study found that medroxyprogesterone acetate posed the highest risk due to its potent effect on progesterone receptors in brain tissue.
  • Higher Risk for Women Over 40: Older women who had used Depo-Provera were particularly vulnerable to developing large, symptomatic meningiomas requiring invasive treatment, including craniotomies and radiation therapy.
  • Confirmed Causal Mechanism: The study reinforced prior biological research showing that meningiomas express progesterone receptors, making them highly susceptible to synthetic progestin stimulation, which can trigger tumor growth.
  • Risk Not Present with Other Hormonal IUDs: Unlike Depo-Provera, the study did not find a significantly increased risk among women using intrauterine devices (IUDs) that release progestins in lower doses.
  • International Labeling Disparities Highlighted: The study pointed out that Depo-Provera labels in Canada and the European Union already contain warnings about meningioma risk, raising questions about why the U.S. label does not include the same cautionary information.

Legal and Medical Implications of the Study

The BMJ study has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities, reinforcing long-held suspicions that Depo-Provera’s high-dose progestin formulation may pose serious health risks.

The 550% increased risk of meningiomas is an alarmingly high statistic that raises concerns about whether Pfizer failed to warn consumers and medical professionals despite mounting evidence of potential harm.

From a legal standpoint, the study provides critical scientific evidence that strengthens the claims of plaintiffs filing Depo-Provera Lawsuits.

The risk ratio is well beyond what is typically required to establish causation in pharmaceutical litigation, meaning that this research will likely play a central role in multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceedings.

On the medical front, this study raises serious concerns about how Depo-Provera should be prescribed moving forward.

Many experts now believe that healthcare providers should reconsider prescribing Depo-Provera for long-term contraception—especially given that Pfizer also manufactures a lower-dose alternative, Depo-SubQ Provera 104, which has not been associated with the same increased brain tumor risk.

Pfizer’s Response and the Need for Further Investigation

Despite the BMJ study’s clear findings, Pfizer has yet to update Depo-Provera’s U.S. labeling to reflect the increased risk of meningiomas.

The company has stated that it is “reviewing emerging data” but has not taken proactive steps to warn consumers or restrict long-term prescribing of the drug.

The results of this study, combined with Pfizer’s failure to act, have bolstered legal arguments for negligence, defective drug design, and failure to warn.

As more lawsuits are filed, plaintiffs will argue that Pfizer prioritized profit over patient safety, failed to provide adequate warnings, and ignored scientific evidence that should have prompted label updates and patient warnings years ago.

The BMJ study will likely be a defining piece of evidence in the Depo-Provera MDL.

Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit?

Long-term Depo-Provera usage has been linked to an heightened risk of developing brain tumors.

To qualify for a legal claim, Depo-Provera users must have received multiple injections of the contraceptive shot and later been diagnosed with an intracranial meningioma or another brain tumor.

Most attorneys handling these cases are focusing on women who have had at least two Depo-Provera injections due to the cumulative exposure risks outlined in the 2024 BMJ study.

In addition to a confirmed brain tumor diagnosis, qualifying claimants should have medical records showing their Depo-Provera usage and documentation of their tumor diagnosis, treatment history, and related health complications.

An experienced attorney will review individual medical histories to determine whether a strong case can be built based on duration of use, severity of health effects, and financial damages incurred.

Women who have suffered vision impairment, neurological complications, cognitive issues, or other life-altering effects due to a meningioma diagnosis may have stronger claims for compensation.

Family members of patients who have passed away due to Depo-Provera-related tumors may also be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of their loved one.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors; Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

If you or a loved one has developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, contact TorHoerman Law today to discuss your eligibility for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.

You can also use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit instantly.

Our legal team is actively investigating claims, gathering medical evidence, and fighting for justice on behalf of affected women.

Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Proving that Depo-Provera caused serious health complications requires strong medical and factual evidence.

Women filing claims must provide documentation that connects their use of the contraceptive shot to their brain tumor diagnosis and resulting medical treatment.

This includes records of medical appointments, imaging scans, and any prescribed treatments such as radiation or surgery.

In cases where plaintiffs have developed inoperable brain tumors, long-term monitoring and ongoing care must also be considered as part of the claim.

Additionally, lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses related to diagnosis, treatment, and any necessary future care.

Gathering the right evidence is crucial for building a strong claim, and our legal team can assist in obtaining the necessary documentation.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors; Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit; Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Key pieces of evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit include:

  • Medical records proving long-term Depo-Provera usage
  • Doctor’s notes and prescriptions showing the frequency and duration of Depo-Provera injections
  • Brain imaging scans (MRI, CT scans) confirming the presence of meningiomas or other brain tumors
  • Records of medical appointments with neurologists, neurosurgeons, or oncologists
  • Surgical reports and pathology findings for those who have undergone invasive brain surgery
  • Documentation of inoperable brain tumors, including physician statements and treatment plans
  • Medical expenses related to treatment, hospital stays, medication, and follow-up care
  • Expert medical opinions linking Depo-Provera usage to the diagnosed condition
  • Employment and financial records showing lost wages or reduced earning capacity due to health complications
  • Personal statements describing symptoms, medical struggles, and the impact on quality of life

Our attorneys will help you gather and retain evidence to build a strong case and pursue the compensation you deserve.

Potential Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Damages in a lawsuit refer to the compensation sought by victims for the harm they have suffered due to negligence or misconduct.

In the Depo-Provera Lawsuit, damages cover both economic and non-economic losses tied to the brain tumor linked to prolonged use of the birth control shot.

Plaintiffs who developed meningiomas or other severe health conditions after taking Depo-Provera may be entitled to financial recovery for their medical costs, lost wages, and the lasting impact on their quality of life.

Many of the women pursuing legal action used Depo-Provera as long-term birth control, unaware of the serious risks posed by high-dose progestin exposure.

Beyond the financial strain of treatment, they often experience emotional distress, cognitive impairments, and life-altering physical symptoms.

If successful, Depo-Provera settlements will likely address the full scope of damages, helping victims recover the financial, physical, and emotional losses they have endured.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors; Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit; Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit; Potential Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit may include:

  • Medical costs for diagnostic testing, brain scans, surgery, radiation, and long-term monitoring
  • Future medical expenses related to ongoing treatment, medication, and therapy
  • Lost wages and diminished earning capacity due to disability or prolonged medical care
  • Pain and suffering caused by debilitating symptoms and invasive procedures
  • Emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and psychological trauma from a brain tumor diagnosis
  • Loss of quality of life, particularly for women who face cognitive impairment, vision loss, or chronic neurological issues
  • Punitive damages if Pfizer is found to have acted with willful disregard for patient safety
  • Loss of consortium for spouses and family members affected by their loved one’s condition

Our attorneys will help calculate the full extent of your damages and fight for maximum compensation to ensure that you receive justice for the harm caused by taking Depo-Provera.

TorHoerman Law: Accepting Clients for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit

For years, Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies have profited from recommending Depo-Provera as a safe and effective contraceptive, despite growing evidence of serious health risks.

Women who developed intracranial meningiomas and other brain tumors after prolonged use of Depo-Provera are now stepping forward to demand accountability.

At TorHoerman Law, we are committed to representing these victims and fighting for the compensation they deserve.

Our firm understands the life-altering impact that a brain tumor diagnosis can have on your health, financial stability, and overall well-being.

We believe that no one should suffer because a drug manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings about its product’s risks.

By taking legal action, you can help hold Pfizer accountable and seek justice for the harm caused by recommending Depo-Provera without sufficient safety warnings.

The Developmental, Regulatory, and Medical History of Depo-Provera; 2024 Scientific Study_ Depo-Provera Users at Increased Risk of Developing Brain Tumors; Do You Qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit; Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit; Potential Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit; TorHoerman Law_ Accepting Clients for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit

If you or a loved one used Depo-Provera and were later diagnosed with a brain tumor, you may qualify for compensation.

Our legal team will handle every aspect of your case, from gathering medical evidence to negotiating potential Depo-Provera settlements.

Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and learn more about your legal options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Published By:
Picture of Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman

Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

About TorHoerman Law

At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.

Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

$495 Million
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

$20 Million
Toxic Tort Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

$103.8 Million
COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

$4 Million
Traumatic Brain Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

$2.8 Million
Defective Heart Device

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.

Guides & Resources
Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Additional Depo-Provera Lawsuit resources on our website:
All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Depo Lawsuit for Brain Tumors: What to Know Before Filing a Claim
Depo Provera Lawsuit
Depo Provera Linked to Brain Tumors
Depo Provera Meningioma Lawsuit
Depo Shot Lawsuit Settlement Amounts
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Amounts
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sign-Up Information
Is There a Depo-Provera Class Action Lawsuit?
The #1 Attorneys for Depo-Provera Lawsuits for Brain Tumors
What is the New Lawsuit for Depo-Provera?
Who Qualifies for a Depo Provera Shot Lawsuit?

Share

Other Depo-Provera Lawsuit Resources

All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation

What Our Clients Have To Say