Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit [2025 Update]

Fort Sill PFAS Contamination: Overview

The Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit investigation concerns forever chemicals in drinking water and groundwater in and around the Oklahoma military base.

TorHoerman Law is currently investigating a potential Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit.

On this page, we’ll discuss the Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit investigation, the levels of PFAS chemicals in groundwater at Fort Sill, the dangers of PFAS chemicals in drinking water and groundwater, health risks linked to PFAS exposure, and much more.

Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit

PFAS Chemicals Detected at High Levels in Fort Sill Groundwater

Fort Sill, located in southwest Oklahoma near Lawton, is a historic U.S. Army installation that has played a central role in American military training and artillery development since the 19th century.

Established in 1869 during the Indian Wars, the base evolved into the Army’s premier artillery training facility and today houses the U.S. Army Field Artillery School, the Air Defense Artillery School, and multiple operational units.

Over the decades, Fort Sill has supported generations of soldiers and remains a vital hub for advanced military training, testing, and joint operations.

However, like many long-standing military sites, Fort Sill has also faced environmental challenges—particularly from the historical use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting drills and emergency response.

AFFF contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of persistent and hazardous chemicals that have contaminated groundwater and raised concerns about exposure risks for both military personnel and surrounding communities.

Recent environmental assessments and testing have focused on identifying PFAS concentrations in and around the installation.

These investigations have placed Fort Sill among the growing list of military sites confronting the legacy of PFAS contamination.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination at Fort Sill and subsequently developed cancer or other serious health problems, you may be eligible to file a PFAS exposure claim.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS claim instantly.

Table of Contents

Dangerous Levels of PFAS Contamination Detected at Fort Sill, Oklahoma

Recent data published by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has revealed dangerously high PFAS concentrations in groundwater at Fort Sill, a major military installation in Oklahoma.

Published by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS chemicals were detected at the following levels in Fort Sill groundwater in 2020:

  • PFOS: 160,000 ppt
  • PFOA: 200,000 ppt
  • PFOS + PFOA: 360,000 ppt
  • PFBS: 6,100 ppt

These levels far exceed the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 4 parts per trillion (ppt) for both PFOA and PFOS in drinking water, raising serious concerns about long-term exposure risks and environmental impact.

The data underscores the need for urgent action to address PFAS water contamination and reduce exposure for military personnel, civilians, and families living in or near Fort Sill.

Sources of PFAS Exposure at Fort Sill

The primary source of PFAS contamination at Fort Sill is the repeated use of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), a specialized firefighting foam historically used on military sites to extinguish jet fuel and chemical fires.

During decades of training exercises, emergency responses, and routine operations, PFAS-containing AFFF seeped into the soil and leached into groundwater, contributing to the widespread PFAS-contaminated water at the installation.

Additional sources of PFAS pollution may include runoff from training areas, storage and disposal of PFAS-containing products, leaks from firefighting equipment, and residual contamination from historic chemical releases.

These toxic substances—specifically PFOS, PFOA, and other polyfluoroalkyl substances—are extremely resistant to natural degradation and can persist in water systems and the environment for decades.

Because Fort Sill is a critical U.S. Army installation, the contamination not only affects military infrastructure but also poses a growing environmental and public health crisis for the region.

Who May Be Exposed to PFAS at Fort Sill

A wide range of individuals may have been exposed to PFAS chemicals at or near Fort Sill.

This includes active-duty military personnel, civilian employees, contractors, and military families who lived or worked on the base when AFFF use was widespread.

People who consumed or used contaminated drinking water from on-base drinking water systems or nearby private drinking water wells are at particular risk.

Surrounding communities relying on affected groundwater may also face elevated health risks due to long-term PFAS exposure.

Documented health consequences linked to PFAS exposure include thyroid disease, immune system disruption, developmental delays, and certain types of cancer such as kidney and testicular cancer.

Given the confirmed PFAS contamination and high PFAS levels detected in water sources at Fort Sill, addressing the contamination through a comprehensive environmental response is essential to protecting public health.

Do You Qualify for the Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit?

Individuals who lived, worked, or served at Fort Sill during periods when PFAS-containing firefighting foam was actively used may qualify to take legal action through the Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit.

Eligibility may extend to military service members, civilian workers, and family members who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated drinking water on base or in surrounding communities using affected private drinking water wells.

If you have been diagnosed with serious health problems—such as thyroid disease, certain cancers, or immune system disorders—and suspect a link to PFAS exposure at Fort Sill, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

PFAS exposure lawsuits are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and may be supported by legislation such as the Camp Lejeune Justice Act or legal principles outlined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

TorHoerman Law is actively reviewing claims related to PFAS contamination at military installations, including Fort Sill, to determine eligibility and help impacted individuals pursue justice and financial relief.

Gathering Evidence for a PFAS Lawsuit

Building a strong PFAS water contamination case requires comprehensive evidence of both exposure and health consequences.

Individuals pursuing legal claims should gather medical records that demonstrate diagnosis of PFAS-related health conditions, such as kidney cancer, testicular cancer, liver damage, or immune system dysfunction.

In addition, any records showing residency, employment, or military service at Fort Sill—especially during the timeframe when aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) was in use—can support your case.

Environmental testing results, water supply reports, and EPA data indicating elevated PFAS concentrations in Fort Sill drinking water supplies or private wells can further corroborate your exposure.

Attorneys may also use PFAS testing, expert analysis, and data from the Environmental Working Group and Department of Defense investigations to strengthen your lawsuit.

The team at TorHoerman Law is prepared to help victims gather critical evidence and navigate the legal process to seek accountability from those responsible for polluting drinking water at military sites like Fort Sill.

TorHoerman Law: Investigating the Fort Sill PFAS Lawsuit

TorHoerman Law is currently investigating claims related to PFAS contamination at Fort Sill, a U.S. Army installation in Oklahoma where dangerously high levels of PFAS chemicals—particularly PFOS and PFOA—have been detected in groundwater and drinking water supplies.

The use of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam widely deployed during military training exercises and emergencies, has been identified as the primary source of this contamination.

These toxic substances, known as forever chemicals, have polluted water systems on and around the base, impacting both military personnel and surrounding communities.

Our legal team is reviewing potential lawsuits on behalf of service members, civilian workers, and family members who may have been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water and later suffered from serious health problems such as thyroid disease, kidney cancer, and other PFAS-related conditions.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Environmental Working Group (EWG), and Department of Defense reports, we aim to hold the responsible parties—including chemical manufacturers and those overseeing hazardous substances at military sites—accountable for the environmental and health damages caused by prolonged PFAS exposure.

If you or a loved one lived or worked at Fort Sill and were exposed to contaminated drinking water, TorHoerman Law may be able to help you pursue compensation through a PFAS water contamination lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS claim instantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are PFAS Chemicals and What are they Used In?

    PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of synthetic chemicals widely used since the 1940s for their resistance to heat, water, and oil.

    These forever chemicals are commonly found in non-stick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, food packaging, and especially in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)—a fire suppressant used by the military for jet fuel fires.

    Because PFAS do not break down easily in the environment, they accumulate in water supplies, soil, and the human body, leading to growing concern over PFAS contamination at military installations like Fort Sill.

  • What Health Concerns are Linked to PFAS Exposure?

    Exposure to PFAS-contaminated drinking water has been linked to numerous serious health problems.

    Studies by the Environmental Protection Agency and environmental health sciences have associated PFAS exposure with thyroid disease, immune system dysfunction, developmental delays, and certain cancers such as kidney and testicular cancer.

    The presence of PFAS chemicals in the human body over time poses an increased risk for long-term serious health consequences, particularly among military personnel and residents relying on on-base drinking water or private drinking water wells.

  • What is the Source of PFAS Contamination at Military Bases?

    The primary source of PFAS contamination at military bases is the widespread and repeated use of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam used to extinguish jet fuel and chemical fires during training exercises and emergency responses.

    This foam contains perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including PFOS and PFOA, which are classified as forever chemicals due to their resistance to environmental breakdown.

    Over time, AFFF has seeped into the soil, groundwater, and drinking water systems at many military installations, resulting in PFAS contamination that has impacted military personnel, surrounding communities, and private drinking water wells.

    These toxic substances persist in the environment, leading to long-term health risks and the need for extensive cleanup efforts.

  • Why Is Fort Sill Being Reviewed for Potential PFAS Contamination?

    Fort Sill is one of many contaminated military bases under scrutiny due to the historical use of firefighting foam and other toxic chemicals.

    The Department of Defense has listed Fort Sill as a potentially contaminated site as part of a broader national review alongside other Army National Guard installations and legacy bases like Cannon Air Force Base, Blue Grass Army Depot, and Sawyer Air Force Base.

    Concerns stem from routine military training exercises, spill events, and legacy waste practices that may have contributed to groundwater contamination impacting both base residents and surrounding communities.

  • What Are the Health Risks of PFAS Exposure for Soldiers and Civilians at Fort Sill?

    Scientific consensus increasingly shows that PFAS pose significant risks to human health.

    Long-term exposure to PFAS—often through drinking contaminated water—can contribute to:

    • Elevated risk of kidney and testicular cancer
    • Liver enzyme abnormalities
    • Compromised immune function
    • Hormonal disruption and reproductive harm
    • Pregnancy-induced hypertension

    Personnel at Fort Sill, nearby National Guard facilities, and communities downstream may have been exposed unknowingly, with exposure pathways similar to those at Marine Corps Base Hawaii and Hunter Army Airfield.

  • How Is the Federal Government Identifying Potential PFAS Releases at Fort Sill?

    As part of the cleanup process, the Department of Defense has partnered with the EPA in joint EPA-Army sampling to identify potential PFAS releases.

    This program is designed to detect early signs of contamination concerns in groundwater, surface water, and soil at high-risk military facilities.

    Fort Sill’s inclusion follows earlier assessments of contaminated military sites across the country, where emerging contaminants like PFAS are prioritized under federal and state cleanup frameworks.

  • What Laws Are Driving PFAS Investigations at Military Bases Like Fort Sill?

    The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has mandated increased testing and reporting at military installations suspected of PFAS pollution.

    This includes Fort Sill and similar national guard installations and army national guard installations that used PFAS-containing materials during training or emergency response.

    The NDAA also facilitates the implementation of new maximum contaminant levels and pressures the DoD to develop safer alternatives, accelerate cleanup, and fund long-term environmental monitoring.

  • Who Could Be Held Responsible for PFAS Contamination at Fort Sill?

    Responsibility may fall on both the federal government and private chemical companies that manufactured the firefighting foams.

    Fort Sill, like the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant and countless other military installations, was likely supplied with PFAS-laden foam without full disclosure of its long-term environmental persistence or health impacts.

    Legal accountability hinges on whether proper safeguards were ignored and whether affected communities were warned in time.

    Currently, lawsuits are targeting PFAS chemical manufacturers, not the federal government or other related entities.

    The federal government is the entity which may address PFAS contamination, but is not the target of lawsuits claiming groundwater and drinking water contaminated with PFAS chemicals resulted in health issues.

    As investigations continue, surrounding communities deserve access to accurate data, medical screening programs, and, when applicable, legal remedies.

Published By:
Picture of Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman

Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

About TorHoerman Law

At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.

Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

$495 Million
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

$20 Million
Toxic Tort Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

$103.8 Million
COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

$4 Million
Traumatic Brain Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

$2.8 Million
Defective Heart Device

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.

Guides & Resources
Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Additional PFAS Contamination Lawsuit resources on our website:
All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Air Force Plant 6 PFAS Lawsuit
Barksdale Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Brunswick Naval Air Station PFAS Lawsuit
Buckley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Castle Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Chanute Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Cheyenne Air National Guard Base PFAS Lawsuit
Corry Station PFAS Lawsuit
Dyess Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Eareckson Air Station PFAS Lawsuit
Eglin Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Ellsworth Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Fairchild Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Benning PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Bragg PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Campbell PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Devens PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Gillem PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Jackson PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Leavenworth PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Ord PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Rucker PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Wainwright PFAS Lawsuit
Galena Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
George Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Great Lakes Naval Station PFAS Lawsuit
Hanscom Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Holloman Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Hurlburt Field PFAS Lawsuit
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant PFAS Lawsuit
Joint Base Lewis McChord PFAS Lawsuit
Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos PFAS Lawsuit
K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Keesler Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Lackland Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Langley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
List of Military Bases with Contaminated Water by State
Little Rock Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Loring Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Lowry Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Maine Army National Guard Bangor Training Site PFAS Lawsuit
March Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Marine Corps Base Quantico PFAS Lawsuit
Mather Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
McClellan Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
McConnell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
McGuire Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point PFAS Lawsuit
Moody Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station Cecil Field PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station Meridian PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station Pensacola PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station South Weymouth PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Auxiliary Landing Field (NALF) Crows PFAS Lawsuit
Naval Surface Warfare Center PFAS Lawsuit
New Castle Air National Guard Base PFAS Lawsuit
Newark Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Offutt Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Patrick Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Pease Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
PFAS Cancer Lawsuit
PFAS Cancer Types
PFAS Firefighter Gear Lawsuit
PFAS Firefighter Lawsuit
PFAS Lawsuit
PFAS Military Lawsuit
PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit
PFAS Water Contamination Lawyer
Plattsburgh Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Randolph Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Reese Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Robins Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Rosecrans Air National Guard Base PFAS Lawsuit
Schriever Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Tinker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Tobyhanna Army Depot PFAS Lawsuit
Travis Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Tulsa Air National Guard Base PFAS Lawsuit
Vance Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Whiteman Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Youngstown Air Reserve Station PFAS Lawsuit

Share

Other PFAS Contamination Lawsuit Resources

All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation

What Our Clients Have To Say