No Longer Accepting Claims
PFAS Contamination Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting claims for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit.
Intake Closed
No Longer Accepting Claims
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting claims for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit.
Intake Closed
The Air Force Plant 6 PFAS Lawsuit investigation concerns forever chemicals in drinking water and groundwater in and around the Georgia Air Force installation.
TorHoerman Law is currently investigating a potential Air Force Plant 6 PFAS Lawsuit.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Air Force Plant 6 PFAS Lawsuit investigation, the levels of PFAS chemicals in groundwater at Air Force Plant 6, the dangers of PFAS chemicals in drinking water and groundwater, health risks linked to PFAS exposure, and much more.
Air Force Plant 6, located in Marietta, Georgia, has played a crucial role in U.S. military aviation since World War II.
Originally constructed to support the war effort, the facility was instrumental in producing B-29 Superfortress bombers and later became a major manufacturing site for military aircraft, including the C-130 Hercules and F-22 Raptor.
The plant has been operated by defense contractors, most notably Lockheed Martin, under U.S. Air Force oversight.
Decades of industrial activity, including aircraft assembly, maintenance, and materials testing, have contributed to significant environmental contamination at the site.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), used in firefighting and emergency response drills, is one of the primary sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in the groundwater.
Testing has revealed dangerously high levels of PFAS chemicals, raising concerns about the potential impact on workers, military personnel, and the surrounding community.
According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS levels at Air Force Plant 6 are significantly higher than the 2024 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for PFAS in drinking water (4 ppt).
PFOS levels were 10,250 times higher than the EPA’s limit, and PFOA levels were measured at 14,250 times higher than the standard.
The combined PFOS and PFOA levels at Air Force Plant 6 were 24,500 times above the EPA’s threshold.
Legal action is being investigated for individuals, including military service members and others, who were exposed to PFAS contamination at Air Force Plant 6 and subsequently suffered health problems.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS pollution at Air Force Plant 6 and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PFAS claim and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation.
Exposure to PFAS in water has led to serious health consequences for many, with individuals experiencing conditions such as cancer, thyroid disease, and immune disorders that disrupt their daily lives and well-being.
PFAS chemicals accumulate in the body, compounding their effects over time and leaving families to deal with the long-term health risks of exposure.
Lawyers are actively investigating the potential for PFAS litigation relating to water contamination at and around military bases in the United States.
Contact us for more information.
Air Force Plant 6, located in Marietta, Georgia, has been identified as a site with significant per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination, primarily due to the extensive use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting exercises and emergency responses.
Air Force Plant 6 is located near two other sites with serious levels of PFAS pollution: Dobbins Air Reserve Base and General Lucius D. Clay National Guard Center.
Dobbins Air Force Base has reported combined PFOA+PFOS levels of 80,770 ppt, and General Lucius D. Clay National Guard Center has reported a staggering 323,650 ppt of combined PFOA+PFOS levels.
AFFF, widely utilized by military installations for its effectiveness in suppressing fuel-based fires, contains high concentrations of PFAS compounds.
Over decades, repeated use of AFFF at Air Force Plant 6 led to substantial PFAS infiltration into the groundwater, posing potential health risks to personnel and surrounding communities.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that PFAS contamination has been confirmed at this facility, among others in Georgia.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also documented Air Force Plant 6 under its Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action program, indicating ongoing environmental assessments and remediation efforts.
Public notices have been issued regarding the completion of Five-Year Reviews of environmental remedies at Air Force Plant 6.
Reported PFAS Levels at Air Force Plant 6 from recen test results are as follows:
Residents and workers near Air Force Plant 6 may have been exposed to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and soil exposure.
The presence of hazardous substances, including PFAS from fire fighting foams, has raised concerns about potential health risks for those who lived or worked in the area.
Individuals relying on private drinking water wells near the facility may have unknowingly consumed PFAS-contaminated water over an extended period.
Long-term exposure to these chemicals is linked to serious health conditions.
Potentially exposed groups include:
The widespread contamination of military sites with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has become a national environmental and public health crisis.
Across the United States, more than 700 military installations have been identified with known or suspected PFAS contamination, largely due to the extensive use of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting exercises, emergency response, and aircraft maintenance.
Air Force Plant 6 is among these sites, with testing revealing significant levels of PFAS chemicals in groundwater.
The facility, like many other military and defense-related locations, relied on AFFF for decades, unknowingly releasing hazardous chemicals into the surrounding environment.
These “forever chemicals” do not break down easily, allowing them to persist in groundwater, soil, and drinking water sources for years.
The Department of Defense (DoD) has initiated investigations and remediation efforts at numerous bases, including water testing, filtration systems, and research into safer firefighting alternatives.
However, progress has been slow, and many affected communities continue to struggle with the long-term consequences of exposure to these toxic substances.
Nearby residents, military personnel, and civilian workers face the possibility of serious health complications linked to PFAS, including cancer, immune disorders, and developmental issues.
As research continues to uncover the full extent of PFAS contamination, legal actions against chemical manufacturers and federal agencies have increased, demanding accountability and comprehensive cleanup efforts.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of synthetic chemicals that have been widely used since the 1940s due to their resistance to heat, water, and oil.
PFAS were first developed for industrial applications, but their use quickly expanded to consumer goods, including nonstick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, and food packaging.
One of the most significant sources of PFAS releases has been the military’s reliance on Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam designed to suppress high-intensity fuel fires.
AFFF was adopted by the U.S. Department of Defense in the 1960s and used extensively at military bases, airports, and training sites across the country.
Over decades, this foam was routinely sprayed onto the ground during fire drills and emergencies, allowing PFAS chemicals to seep into soil and contaminate local water systems and drinking water supplies.
As concerns about PFAS contamination grew, researchers began detecting these chemicals at significant and sometimes alarming concentrations in drinking water supplies near military and industrial sites.
Studies found that even at detectable levels, PFAS exposure was linked to serious health risks, prompting increased scrutiny from environmental and health agencies.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Defense have since implemented measures to reduce PFAS levels in affected communities, but the persistence of these chemicals makes remediation challenging.
In response to growing public and legal pressure, the military has started phasing out legacy AFFF formulations and replacing them with alternative firefighting agents.
However, PFAS contamination remains widespread, and ongoing efforts are needed to assess exposure risks, improve filtration technologies, and prevent further environmental damage.
PFAS contamination poses significant risks to human health, and a recent study estimates that 99% of Americans have detectable levels of PFAS in their blood.
PFAS chemicals accumulate in the human body over time, leading to prolonged exposure that can disrupt vital biological functions.
Research has linked PFAS exposure to an increased risk of various diseases, including cancer, immune system suppression, and metabolic disorders.
Because PFAS are highly persistent, even low levels of exposure through contaminated drinking water, food, or household products can have long-term health consequences.
Studies have shown that these chemicals interfere with hormone regulation, potentially leading to reproductive issues and developmental delays in infants and children.
PFAS exposure has been associated with elevated cholesterol levels, liver damage, and increased risks of high blood pressure.
Communities living near contaminated military bases, industrial sites, and landfills are particularly vulnerable to these health effects.
Health effects linked to PFAS exposure include:
Exposure to PFAS in water brings serious health risks, as these persistent chemicals accumulate in the body over time, leading to increased chances of cancers, immune disorders, and liver damage.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS-contaminated drinking water at or around Air Force Plant 6, contact our law firm today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to get in touch with our law firm and for a free case evaluation.
Lawyers are actively investigating the potential for PFAS Litigation against manufacturers who may be responsible for rampant contamination at and around military sites.
Building a strong PFAS claim requires thorough and organized evidence to demonstrate exposure and its effects.
Key documents, such as medical records and water testing results, help establish the link between
PFAS contamination and health issues.
Gathering this evidence is essential to support your claim and increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.
Evidence in a PFAS Lawsuit may include:
Toxic PFAS chemicals have been detected in water in and around Air Force Plant 6.
PFAS pollution is a national health concern, and is especially relevant near military sites where firefighting foam was used.
Exposure to PFAS contaminated water has been linked to a number of human health problems and environmental damage.
Our PFAS Lawyers are currently investigating lawsuits against chemical companies and PFAS manufacturers who knew about the risks of health effects but failed to warn the public.
If you’ve suffered from the serious health risks of exposure to PFAS at Air Force Plant 6, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact our law firm today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page for an instant case evaluation to find out if you qualify for a PFAS claim instantly.
Exposure to PFAS pollution primarily occurs through exposure to contaminated water and fire fighting foams.
Tap water and private drinking water wells are primary sources through which civilians are exposed.
Direct and in-direct exposure to AFFF firefighting foam are primary sources for military personnel.
These chemicals infiltrate groundwater and surface water sources, making private wells particularly vulnerable in areas near military bases, airports, and industrial facilities with known PFAS releases.
Because PFAS are highly resistant to natural degradation, they accumulate over time, remaining in water systems at detectable levels long after their initial introduction.
Consumption of contaminated water, whether through drinking, cooking, or bathing, serves as a primary route of human exposure, allowing PFAS to bioaccumulate in the body.
In addition to water contamination, PFAS are present in various consumer goods, such as food packaging and household products, further compounding exposure risks.
According to recent data, more than 700 military installations across the United States have known or suspected PFAS releases, potentially contaminating countless tap water systems, private wells, groundwater, rivers, lakes, and more from Alaska to Florida.
Testing and remediation have been slow and costly, but some progress to identify sites with high levels of contamination have shown that certain locations have PFAS concentrations far exceeding safe limits.
Bases such as Eglin Air Force Base, Patrick Space Force Base, and Ellsworth Air Force Base have recorded some of the highest PFAS levels in groundwater, raising serious concerns for both military personnel and surrounding communities.
In 2024, the Biden administration and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a joint project to test and sample private drinking water wells near Army installations for PFAS.
The installations scheduled for sampling under the program are:
These are just 9 of the 235 military installations to be tested by the Army.
Countless more Air Force Bases, Naval installations, and other military sites have used AFFF containing PFAS and are grappling with contamination.
Yes, testing for PFAS in tap water is possible, though it often requires specialized methods.
Many public water utilities are beginning to conduct regular PFAS testing in compliance with new EPA guidelines, providing results to local residents if PFAS are detected.
For those on private wells or interested in testing their own tap water, professional testing services are available through certified environmental labs.
While at-home PFAS testing kits are emerging on the market, these kits may lack the sensitivity and accuracy of laboratory testing, which can detect even trace amounts.
People relying on well water, especially near industrial sites or military bases, are advised to test for PFAS due to the higher likelihood of contamination in unmonitored sources.
Laboratory testing can provide a detailed report on the specific PFAS chemicals present, allowing individuals to understand their exposure levels more accurately.
To ensure reliable results, residents should seek out labs certified by the EPA or their state environmental agencies for PFAS testing.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other trusted agencies, human exposure to PFAS contamination in drinking water has been linked to a number of serious health effects.
PFAS chemicals accumulate in the body over time, increasing the risk of developing chronic and potentially life-threatening conditions.
Studies have shown that PFAS can interfere with hormone function, damage organs, and weaken the immune system, making individuals more susceptible to illnesses.
Because PFAS do not easily break down, even low levels of exposure can lead to long-term health issues that may affect multiple generations.
Health Issues Associated with PFAS Exposure:
Symptoms of exposure to PFAS can vary widely and often depend on the duration and level of exposure.
Common health issues linked to PFAS include immune system suppression, hormonal imbalances, and various cancers.
People with prolonged exposure may also experience higher cholesterol levels and liver damage.
While some symptoms are general, others are specific and may require medical testing for confirmation.
Common Symptoms of PFAS Exposure:
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our PFAS Contamination Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.