Active Litigation
Defective Heated Clothing Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Defective Heated Clothing Lawsuit.
Active Litigation
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Defective Heated Clothing Lawsuit.
The Costco heated socks recall lawsuit investigation centers on reports that 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold at Costco may cause burns during normal cold-weather use.
These injuries can involve pain, blistering, medical treatment, and disruption to walking, work, and daily activities.
TorHoerman Law is investigating burn injury cases linked to heated socks and insoles, including the 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold at Costco.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of over 200,000 pairs of heated socks sold under the 32 Degrees brand after reports of heat-related injuries.
The recall covers about 207,806 pairs of black 32 Degrees Heated Socks that were sold exclusively at Costco stores and their online store from August 2025 through March 2026.
CPSC reported 14 heat-related incidents, including 13 first- or second-degree burns, and instructed consumers to stop using the socks and return them to Costco for a refund.
The recalled socks include a rechargeable battery pack and are designed to generate warmth around the feet and toes during cold weather use.
According to the recall notice, the socks can create a burn hazard when worn during high intensity activities that produce a combination of heat, excessive friction, moisture, and pressure.
That mechanism is consistent with broader concerns involving heated socks and insoles, where a powered warming product can expose the foot to unsafe heat inside enclosed footwear.
If the product overheats, creates a hot spot, traps moisture, or fails to regulate temperature, the burn risk may increase before the user realizes the skin has been damaged.
Although this recall focuses on burn injuries rather than a reported fire, the same category of battery-powered heated wearables has raised safety concerns when heat and electrical components are placed directly against the body.
If you or a loved one suffered burns after using 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold at Costco, TorHoerman Law can review your case and explain your legal options.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to get in touch with our product liability lawyers today.
The recall of 32 Degrees Heated Socks gives consumers a clearer picture of which products may be affected and what steps they should take now.
The voluntary recall covers about 207,806 pairs of black heated socks sold in three sizes: medium, large, and extra large.
The affected socks can be identified by the label “32° HEAT,” which appears on the battery pack casing, battery pack packaging, user manual, and exterior retail packaging.
The socks were sold at Costco stores and Costco.com from August 2025 through March 2026 for about $30 to $46, and were imported by David Peyser Sportswear d/b/a 32 Degrees after being manufactured in China.
The recall notice states that the socks may pose an injury hazard when worn during high-intensity activities that create heat, excessive friction, moisture, and pressure.
At the time of the recall, 14 heat-related incidents had been reported, with 13 involving first- or second-degree burns.
The remedy offered through the recall is a refund, and CPSC instructed customers to stop using the heated socks and return them to Costco for a full refund.

Consumers who purchased the recalled socks should consider taking the following steps:
Consumers who suffered burn injuries may need to take steps beyond returning the product for a refund.
A refund does not address medical bills, pain, missed work, scarring, or other losses caused by a burn injury.
People who were burned while using recalled 32 Degrees Heated Socks may want to preserve the product and related evidence before sending anything back, because the socks, battery pack, packaging, and purchase records may be important in a potential injury claim.
32 Degrees Heated Socks were recalled because they can cause burn injuries during use.
The recall notice states that the injury hazard may occur during high-intensity activities that create heat, excessive friction, moisture, and pressure inside footwear.
This can expose the skin to unsafe conditions around the foot before the user realizes a burn has developed.
The recall was issued after multiple heat-related incidents, most of which involved first- or second-degree burns.

The recall concerns include:
The 32 Degrees Heated Socks recall reflects a larger safety concern involving battery-powered socks and insoles that are marketed for warmth during skiing, hiking, hunting, outdoor work, winter sports, and other cold-weather activities.
Heated socks have become more common because they promise sustained warmth inside boots without bulky layers, usually through battery-powered heating zones placed near the toes or forefoot.
In the 32 Degrees recall, federal regulators tied the burn hazard to activity conditions where heat, excessive friction, moisture, and pressure build together inside footwear.
The same injury mechanism appeared in the 2025 Fieldsheer heated sock recall, where the socks were recalled after reports of burns and blisters during high-intensity activities involving the same combination of heat, friction, moisture, and pressure.
Some heated sock hazards may develop gradually as the product stays pressed against the skin, while others may involve battery malfunctions, sparking, overheating, or fire.
CPSC’s warning on WOTOTIC and Ackpair heated socks described fires, sparking, and malfunctioning incidents that resulted in burn injuries, including second- and third-degree burns.

Potential causes of heated sock burn injuries include:
Different heated sock products may expose users to burn risks in different ways because designs vary by battery type, heating element placement, control settings, fabric, and intended activity level.
A sock used for skiing may create different pressure and moisture conditions than one worn for hunting from a stand or working outdoors for hours.
A product does not have to catch fire to cause a burn if heat, pressure, and moisture keep unsafe temperatures against the skin long enough.
Burn injuries tied to heated socks can therefore overlap with the broader concerns raised in defective heated clothing and heated insole cases, while still presenting product-specific issues involving socks worn directly against the foot.
You may be eligible to file a product liability lawsuit if you suffered burns or related injuries while using recalled socks sold at Costco.
The recall covers black 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold in medium, large, and extra large sizes at Costco stores and Costco.com from August 2025 through March 2026.
A claim may be stronger if the socks were being used as intended during ordinary cold-weather activity when the burn occurred. Relevant injuries may include first- or second-degree burns, blistering, open wounds, pain, scarring, or any condition that required medical care.
Medical records, photographs, purchase records, and the recalled socks themselves may help show what happened and how the injury affected you.

A refund from Costco does not necessarily cover medical bills, lost income, pain, or other losses caused by a burn injury.
Product liability claims may examine whether the socks were defectively designed, inadequately tested, or sold without sufficient warnings about the burn risk.
TorHoerman Law can review your situation and explain whether you may have a claim involving 32 Degrees Heated Socks.
Evidence is important in a heated sock burn injury claim because it helps show how the product was used, how the injury occurred, and how severe the harm became.
The condition of the socks, battery pack, and surrounding materials may provide insight into whether heat, friction, or a malfunction contributed to the injury.
Medical documentation is equally important because it establishes the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term effects of the burn.
Preserving this information early can help connect the product to the injury and support a claim.

Evidence in these cases may include:
Damages refer to the losses an injured person may seek to recover after being harmed by a defective product.
In heated sock injury cases, lawyers assess damages by reviewing medical records, treatment history, and how the injury has affected daily life and work.
This includes calculating the cost of care already received as well as any future treatment that may be needed.
Attorneys also evaluate the physical and emotional impact of the injury, including pain, scarring, and limitations on movement or activity.
The goal is to present a clear and complete picture of the harm so compensation reflects both immediate and long-term effects.

Compensation in these cases may include:
The 32 Degrees Heated Socks recall raises serious questions about product safety, testing, warnings, and the injuries reported by consumers who used the socks for warmth.
Burn claims involving recalled heated socks may require a review of the product, purchase records, medical treatment, and the circumstances surrounding the injury.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold at Costco and injuries linked to the reported burn hazard.

If you or a loved one suffered burns after using 32 Degrees Heated Socks, contact TorHoerman Law to have your case reviewed.
A consultation can help determine whether your injury may support a product liability claim and what legal options may be available.
The recall covers black 32 Degrees Heated Socks sold in medium, large, and extra large sizes at Costco stores and Costco.com from August 2025 through March 2026.
The affected socks can be identified by the “32° HEAT” label on the battery pack casing, battery pack packaging, user manual, and exterior retail packaging.
Consumers were instructed to stop using the recalled socks and return them to Costco for a full refund.
Liability in a 32 Degrees heated socks lawsuit may extend beyond just the brand name on the product.
Product liability law allows injured consumers to pursue claims against multiple parties involved in the design, manufacturing, importation, and sale of the product.
In this case, the recall identifies both the importer and the retail seller, which can be relevant depending on how the product reached the consumer.
Determining liability often depends on who controlled the product, provided warnings, or placed it into the stream of commerce.
Companies that may be liable include:
32 Degrees Heated Socks are designed to be worn inside shoes or boots during cold weather to keep the feet warm for extended periods.
Consumers commonly use them while skiing, hiking, hunting, working outdoors, or spending long hours in winter conditions where standard socks may not provide enough insulation.
The socks are powered by a rechargeable battery pack and are intended to deliver consistent heat directly to the feet while in use.
Because they are worn inside enclosed footwear and often used during physical activity, the socks may remain in contact with the same areas of the foot for long periods.
In those conditions, heat, pressure, and moisture can build inside the boot, which may increase the risk of skin irritation or burn injury if the product does not regulate temperature safely.
If you still have recalled 32 Degrees Heated Socks, stop using them immediately and check whether the product has the “32° HEAT” label on the battery pack casing, battery packaging, manual, or exterior packaging.
The recalled socks were sold in black in medium, large, and extra large sizes at Costco stores and Costco.com from August 2025 through March 2026.
If you were not injured, Costco has instructed customers to return the socks for a full refund. If you suffered a burn injury, preserve the socks, battery pack, packaging, purchase records, photographs, and medical records before returning or discarding anything.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Defective Heated Clothing Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.