If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bike accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law will take a Sterigenics Ethylene Oxide Exposure case to trial in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2026.
The plaintiff in the upcoming trial is a Cobb County resident who lived near the facility and was unknowingly exposed to EtO emissions over the course of several years.
This case is part of a broader national effort to hold Sterigenics accountable for environmental contamination and resulting injuries in multiple communities.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit.
On this page, we’ll discuss the basis of the Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit, facilities in the United States known to release ethylene oxide emissions, the health risks of exposure to ethylene oxide, past lawsuits filed by those who have inhaled ethylene oxide and suffered health effects, and much more.
Medical sterilization facilities responsible for sanitizing equipment across the United States are emitting a known human carcinogen, Ethylene Oxide (EtO), into surrounding communities.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified ethylene oxide as a Group 1 human carcinogen, meaning there is clear evidence linking exposure to cancer in humans.
Used primarily to sterilize medical instruments and certain food products, EtO is a hazardous air pollutant that poses significant health risks when released into the air.
Inhalation exposure to EtO has been linked to breast cancer, leukemia (ALL, AML, CLL, and Hairy Cell Leukemia), Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and various types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Communities living near facilities that use EtO face an elevated cancer risk, particularly when emissions are not properly controlled.
Studies have shown that long-term exposure increases the likelihood of genetic mutations, cellular damage, and tumor development.
Many affected individuals were unknowingly exposed to ethylene oxide for years, unaware of the serious health consequences.
Lawsuits are now being investigated and filed against Sterigenics and other companies to hold them accountable for negligent releases of these chemicals, seeking compensation for victims suffering from life-altering diagnoses.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
A Georgia judge has declared a mistrial regarding punitive damages in a lawsuit that recently concluded with a $20 million compensatory award against C.R. Bard.
After a juror admitted they went along with the group without personally agreeing with the decision, the retrial will focus solely on punitive damages.
This retrial aims to hold Bard accountable for its alleged reckless disregard for public health at its sterilization plant in Covington, GA.
Plaintiff Gary Walker, a longtime resident near the facility and a former delivery driver for the site, developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after prolonged exposure to ethylene oxide.
The jury initially awarded $50 million in punitive damages, but that amount was voided after the juror disclosed it.
Judge Emily Brantley confirmed that a new trial will be held to determine whether Bard should be held financially responsible beyond compensatory damages.
Under Georgia law, jurors must find intent or conscious indifference to award punitive damages; however, juries are not informed about statutory caps.
A statutory cap is a legal limit on how much money someone can receive in a lawsuit, often used to restrict payouts for things like pain and suffering or punitive damages.
Walker’s case is part of a larger trend of litigation related to toxic ethylene oxide emissions from medical sterilization facilities.
In March 2024, the EPA issued updated safety standards that included continuous emissions monitoring and more stringent controls on sterilization equipment.
Despite calls for safer alternatives, the gas continues to be widely used in the U.S. medical supply chain.
TorHoerman Law will take a Sterigenics Ethylene Oxide Exposure case to trial in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2026.
The case involves allegations that Sterigenics, a medical sterilization company, released ethylene oxide (EtO), a known carcinogen, into the air surrounding its facility in Cobb County.
The plaintiff in the upcoming trial is a Cobb County resident who lived near the facility and was unknowingly exposed to EtO emissions over the course of several years.
The lawsuit alleges that Sterigenics failed to install proper environmental controls or emission scrubbers and vented EtO directly into a residential community.
EtO has been recognized for decades as a cancer-causing chemical.
The facility’s emissions reportedly continued without proper mitigation until within the last five years.
The lawsuit claims that Sterigenics did not notify the public of the potential dangers until after external scrutiny forced disclosure.
There were no town halls, mailers, or other efforts to inform residents prior to litigation.
Eligible claimants may include individuals who lived in the affected areas of Cobb County and later developed cancer or other serious illnesses linked to EtO exposure.
This case is part of a broader national effort to hold Sterigenics accountable for environmental contamination and resulting injuries in multiple communities.
A Georgia jury awarded $20 million on Friday to Gary Walker, a retired truck driver who claimed that exposure to ethylene oxide(EtO) from C.R. Bard’s Covington plant caused his lymphoma.
The jury found Bard liable for negligence and nuisance, concluding that punitive damages are warranted.
Thus, a second trial phase will begin on Monday, May 19.
Walker, now in remission, lived about 1.5 miles from the C.R. Bard facility starting in 1991 and made regular deliveries to the plant until retiring in 1999.
He was diagnosed with lymphoma in 2017 at the age of 68 and underwent ten rounds of chemotherapy along with a stem-cell transplant.
Walker’s legal team presented internal and regulatory documents showing that Bard had declined to implement emissions controls for decades, despite warnings from regulators and its EtO supplier, Union Carbide.
Jurors were presented with a 1985 memo from Georgia environmental officials stating that Bard “does not want to control its emissions at this time.”
In closing arguments, plaintiffs’ counsel Lindsay Forlines argued that Bard had “devices for control available” but “refused to employ them.”
The defense argued that Walker’s cancer was unrelated and stated that “no doctor ever told him that EtO had anything to do with his cancer,” according to closing statements by Eric Rumanek of Troutman Pepper Locke LLP.
This is the first EtO exposure case in Georgia to result in a plaintiff verdict, which may indicate considerable liability for Bard.
The punitive damages phase will resume on Monday, May 19, before Judge Emily Brantley.
On Tuesday, a Georgia jury began hearing claims that C.R. Bard’s medical sterilization plant in Covington exposed a resident to ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions for nearly 50 years, allegedly resulting in his cancer diagnosis.
Plaintiff Gary Walker, a retired truck driver, alleges that he developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma due to repeated occupational and residential exposure to EtO.
His attorneys informed jurors that the plant emitted nearly 10 million pounds of gas from 1970 to 2017, operated without emissions controls until 1990, and disregarded warnings from regulators and its EtO supplier, Union Carbide.
They presented a 1985 memo from Georgia officials stating that Bard “does not want to control its emissions at this time.”
Bard denies the claims and contends that Walker’s cancer resulted from a spontaneous genetic mutation unrelated to EtO.
The company adheres to regulatory standards and has implemented safety measures as federal requirements have evolved.
Defense counsel highlighted EtO’s role in sterilizing over half of all U.S. medical devices and referenced Bard’s use of safety monitoring and pollution controls.
This case marks the first exposure to ethylene oxide in Georgia to be presented before a jury.
Similar litigation is occurring in other states, following recent defense verdicts in Colorado and Pennsylvania.
Steris Corporation has agreed to pay up to $48.15 million to resolve a wave of personal injury claims tied to emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its former sterilization facility in Waukegan, Illinois.
The settlement, reached through its Isomedix subsidiary, aims to resolve nearly all pending lawsuits in Cook County Circuit Court involving claims of cancer and other health issues linked to EtO exposure.
The deal, disclosed in a March 2025 securities filing, comes after mounting legal and regulatory scrutiny surrounding EtO, a carcinogenic gas used to sterilize approximately half of all medical devices in the U.S.
The plaintiffs allege that emissions from the Waukegan site endangered public health between 2005 and 2008, when Steris operated the facility.
While Steris emphasized that the agreement does not admit liability or concede that emissions posed a safety risk, it agreed to the payout to resolve the cases efficiently.
The company stated it will record the settlement as a charge in its fiscal 2025 earnings but exclude it from adjusted earnings metrics.
The first EtO lawsuit against Steris ended in a mistrial earlier this year.
Now, the proposed settlement is pending court approval and hinges on a substantial majority of plaintiffs opting in.
Should those conditions not be met, Isomedix retains the right to withdraw from the agreement and continue defending itself in court.
The Environmental Protection Agency has flagged multiple EtO sterilization facilities nationwide as high cancer risk sites.
In response, it has tightened emission regulations, while medical device manufacturers and sterilization companies work to adopt safer alternatives, such as vaporized hydrogen peroxide.
Steris remains one of the world’s largest medical device sterilization providers through its Applied Sterilization Technologies unit, which absorbed the Isomedix brand.
Braun, a German medical device manufacturer, has reached a confidential settlement to resolve the majority of lawsuits alleging that emissions from its Lehigh County, Pennsylvania facility exposed residents to toxic levels of ethylene oxide, a gas linked to cancer and neurological damage.
Dozens of lawsuits had been filed by local residents claiming that emissions from the plant caused elevated cancer risks and other serious health effects.
The plaintiffs alleged that long-term exposure to ethylene oxide—a chemical used to sterilize medical equipment—led to increased diagnoses of breast cancer, lymphoma, and other illnesses.
Though the company denies wrongdoing, B. Braun confirmed the settlement this week and stated that it will continue defending itself against any remaining claims. Details of the settlement remain confidential.
In response to the litigation and public health concerns, B. Braun noted that it installed a new emission control system in 2020 that reduced ethylene oxide emissions by more than 99.9%.
The move was made voluntarily and went beyond regulatory requirements, the company said.
The settlement comes amid a broader national reckoning over ethylene oxide use.
In March 2024, the EPA issued stricter rules for commercial sterilization facilities, including continuous air monitoring and limits on emissions during equipment start-up and shutdown.
These rules apply to approximately 90 sterilization facilities across the U.S.
The lawsuits against B. Braun are part of a growing wave of litigation targeting medical sterilization companies.
In 2023, Sterigenics agreed to a $408 million settlement over similar ethylene oxide exposure claims in Illinois, Georgia, and Michigan. Another company, Steris, is currently facing hundreds of similar lawsuits.
Although ethylene oxide is still used to sterilize about half of all U.S. medical equipment, advocates and health experts continue to call for safer alternatives.
The outcome of these cases—and increasing public scrutiny—may pressure both manufacturers and regulators to accelerate the transition to safer sterilization technologies.
Cosmed Group Inc., a medical and food sterilization company, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection following a wave of lawsuits alleging its use of ethylene oxide (EtO) caused cancer and other serious health conditions.
The bankruptcy filing, made in Houston, Texas, comes in response to at least 300 lawsuits, including two class actions.
Plaintiffs allege exposure to ethylene oxide emissions from Cosmed facilities led to long-term health risks, particularly in surrounding communities.
Ethylene oxide is a known human carcinogen used in sterilizing medical devices and food products like spices and grains.
During a court hearing, Cosmed’s attorney David Eastlake acknowledged that litigation tied to both current and former facility operations had threatened the company’s viability.
The lawsuits span several jurisdictions and relate to alleged injuries from airborne emissions over extended periods.
Cosmed also filed alongside an affiliate, Spicey Partners Real Estate Holdings, listing more than $100 million in liabilities.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez approved an emergency motion allowing the company to cover a $65,000 payroll for its 51 employees, while additional operational requests will be considered in future hearings.
This isn’t Cosmed’s first encounter with environmental scrutiny. In 2005, the company paid a $1.5 million settlement following a U.S. EPA probe into EtO emissions at facilities across six states.
The bankruptcy move follows similar legal pressures faced by other sterilization companies in recent years, as regulators and communities increase scrutiny over the health impact of ethylene oxide.
Cosmed has not yet announced whether it intends to pursue a global settlement as part of its Chapter 11 proceedings.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have agreed to a $35 million settlement to resolve a group of lawsuits alleging that emissions from the company’s Cobb County, Georgia facility caused cancer and other serious health problems.
The deal marks a pivotal moment in the growing wave of ethylene oxide litigation across the state.
The lead plaintiff in the settled case developed leukemia at the age of 20 after living for 13 years near the Sterigenics medical sterilization plant.
Filed in 2020, the plaintiff’s lawsuit argued that prolonged exposure to airborne ethylene oxide—a known carcinogen—was the likely cause of his illness.
Ethylene oxide is used to sterilize medical equipment due to its DNA-disrupting properties, but those same properties are linked to cancer in humans.
According to the CDC and NIH, the compound is associated with heightened risks of leukemia, lymphoma, and other cancers through inhalation and environmental exposure.
The plaintiff’s lawsuit, one of the first in Georgia targeting Sterigenics’ emissions, paved the way for broader legal scrutiny.
The plaintiff is now in remission and recently completed his degree from the University of Utah.
Under the terms of the conditional settlement, all plaintiffs involved must agree for the deal to take effect.
While Sterigenics and Sotera deny any wrongdoing or liability, they agreed to the payout to resolve the claims and avoid ongoing litigation.
This settlement does not resolve all outstanding legal challenges.
The companies intend to continue defending against additional personal injury and property value lawsuits, including upcoming hearings scheduled for October 2024 that will examine general causation evidence.
The $35 million agreement may influence the trajectory of other ethylene oxide cases in Georgia and nationwide, particularly as plaintiffs argue that emissions from sterilization plants pose an unacceptable public health risk.
The EPA’s Final Rule for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) and polymer and resin manufacturing sectors aims to drastically reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants, especially ethylene oxide (EtO) and chloroprene, which are both known human carcinogens.
Key Highlights of the Final Rule:
Monitoring Requirements: Facilities will be required to conduct fenceline monitoring for specific air toxics, including EtO and chloroprene, with the data made publicly accessible to inform and protect nearby communities.
After years of mounting scientific evidence and growing public alarm, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing its first major update in over a decade to safety rules governing ethylene oxide (EtO)—a toxic gas linked to cancer that is used to sterilize about 50% of all medical devices in the United States.
The final rule, expected to be released by the March 1 court-ordered deadline, will establish stricter emissions limits for commercial sterilization facilities and enhanced worker safety protocols for those routinely exposed to EtO.
Mounting Health Concerns Drive Urgency
The move follows an EPA 2016 risk assessment that found EtO to be far more carcinogenic than previously understood.
The gas, already recognized by the CDC and NIH as a human carcinogen, is linked to breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia, among others.
Children and those living near sterilizing plants are particularly vulnerable.
Communities across the U.S., including in Laredo, TX, Covington, GA, and suburban Chicago, have rallied against nearby sterilization plants after learning they had been exposed to dangerous levels of the gas for decades—often without warning. Lawsuits and protests have followed.
One high-profile case in Georgia recently resulted in a $35 million settlement from Sterigenics and parent company Sotera, while another in Illinois awarded $363 million to a breast cancer survivor.
The finalized EPA rule is expected to include:
However, critics say the rule falls short by not requiring air monitoring around facilities or addressing EtO emissions from off-site warehouses, where sterilized products continue to off-gas.
While environmental and public health advocates view the rule as long overdue, industry groups warn of disruption.
The Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) says companies could face over $500 million in compliance costs, potentially slowing sterilization workflows and impacting medical device availability.
The FDA has expressed concern, warning that overly restrictive rules could hinder access to essential medical supplies.
Ethylene oxide is still considered the most reliable method for sterilizing complex devices, and alternatives like steam, radiation, or hydrogen peroxide vapor are not always viable.
Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have reached a $408 million settlement with 879 individuals who filed lawsuits alleging that emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from the company’s now-closed Willowbrook, Illinois facility caused cancer and other health complications.
The agreement resolves nearly all of the 882 cases pending against the company, which stemmed from the EPA’s 2018 detection of dangerously high concentrations of EtO in the air surrounding the Willowbrook site.
In 2019, the state ordered the facility closed.
Since then, the area has become one of several so-called “cancer alleys” where local residents allege long-term exposure to EtO led to serious illnesses.
EtO is a sterilizing gas used in roughly half of all U.S. medical devices.
While essential to infection control, it’s also a known human carcinogen, with chronic exposure linked to leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, and other conditions.
Children are considered particularly vulnerable due to EtO’s mutagenic effects on DNA.
The decision to settle follows a landmark 2022 jury verdict in which Sterigenics was ordered to pay $220 million to a single plaintiff, breast cancer survivor Susan Kamuda. Sotera and Griffith Foods, its corporate predecessor, were also hit with large penalties, pushing the total to $363 million.
The staggering award likely influenced the company’s decision to settle the rest of the Illinois claims rather than risk similar outcomes at trial.
Although Sterigenics denies wrongdoing and maintains its Willowbrook operations did not pose a safety risk, the company acknowledged the financial risk of continuing litigation.
Before taxes, the average payout per claimant under the agreement would be approximately $545,000.
Three plaintiffs opted out of the settlement and will proceed through pretrial discovery.
This resolution does not mark the end of Sterigenics’ EtO litigation.
The company still faces lawsuits in Georgia and New Mexico over similar allegations.
Additionally, new EPA regulations aimed at drastically reducing EtO emissions and greater scrutiny from both federal and state agencies suggest future legal and regulatory challenges are likely.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has launched a nationwide initiative to inform communities about the health risks associated with ethylene oxide (EtO), a toxic gas used to sterilize roughly half of all U.S. medical devices.
The campaign includes updated risk data, public webinars, and community meetings for residents near nearly 100 commercial sterilization facilities.
Of these, 23 sites have been identified as posing elevated lifetime cancer risks due to long-term EtO exposure.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan emphasized the agency’s commitment to transparency and public engagement, particularly in areas with the highest risk.
EtO exposure is linked to breast cancer, leukemia, and other severe conditions.
While short-term levels don’t exceed health benchmarks, the EPA’s primary concern is cumulative, long-term exposure, especially for children and workers.
To address this, the EPA collects emissions data, reviews Clean Air Act regulations, and prepares stricter pollution control requirements for sterilization plants.
It also coordinates with the FDA to ensure that medical device availability is not compromised.
In a major step toward transparency and environmental justice, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it is expanding Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements to include 29 previously unregulated sterilization facilities that use large amounts of ethylene oxide (EtO).
EtO is a known human carcinogen, with links to breast cancer, leukemia, and other severe health conditions.
The new reporting rule will also apply to ethylene glycol, a related chemical.
The EPA’s move comes after years of concerns from community advocates about undisclosed EtO emissions near residential areas, schools, and historically underserved communities.
Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), the EPA is using discretionary authority to mandate that these facilities report emissions and waste management data for EtO and ethylene glycol starting in 2023, based on activities tracked from January 2022.
The 29 selected facilities are among the highest EtO users in the contract sterilization sector and will likely exceed the TRI threshold of 10,000 pounds per year.
Two facilities originally considered were exempted—one no longer performs sterilization, and the other uses EtO in minimal quantities.
Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a colorless, flammable gas widely used to sterilize medical devices that cannot withstand high-temperature steam sterilization.
Despite its efficacy in sterilization, EtO is recognized as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of the World Health Organization (WHO).
Chronic inhalation exposure to EtO has been linked to an increased incidence of lymphatic and hematopoietic cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and leukemia, as well as breast cancer.
Communities residing near facilities with uncontrolled industrial emissions of EtO face elevated cancer risks due to cumulative exposure over time.
In response to these health concerns, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented stringent regulations to reduce EtO emissions from commercial sterilization facilities by over 90%, aiming to mitigate the associated cancer risks.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against companies operating EtO-emitting facilities, alleging negligence in controlling emissions and failure to protect public health.
Plaintiffs seek compensation for health issues attributed to EtO exposure.
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, or another serious illness after living or working near a facility emitting ethylene oxide, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims nationwide to help affected individuals seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
Contact us today for a free case evaluation to learn more about your rights.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit instantly.
Environmental exposure to ethylene oxide is a serious concern near facilities that use this chemical as a sterilizing agent for medical devices and medical equipment.
Long-term exposure to EtO emissions from these plants has been linked to an increased risk of developing breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
Residents and workers in surrounding communities may have been unknowingly exposed to hazardous levels of ethylene oxide for years.
Many lawsuits allege that companies failed to adequately control emissions or warn the public about the dangers of cumulative exposure.
Facilities Currently Under Investigation:
We are also investigating ethylene oxide exposure claims in the following states, beyond the facilities listed above:
Multiple lawsuits against Sterigenics and other medical sterilization companies have resulted in substantial financial compensation for victims affected by ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
One of the most notable cases involved the Sterigenics Willowbrook Facility, where residents and workers alleged that prolonged toxic exposure to EtO emissions led to increased cancer rates in the surrounding community.
In 2022, a jury awarded $363 million to a plaintiff who developed breast cancer after years of exposure from the Sterigenics Willowbrook Plant.
This verdict was followed by a 2023 global settlement of $408 million to resolve hundreds of lawsuits filed by Illinois residents.
These results demonstrate that courts recognize the serious health risks associated with EtO exposure, holding negligent companies accountable for their actions.
Notable EtO Lawsuit Results:
Human exposure to ethylene oxide has been linked to numerous adverse health effects, including an increased risk of cancer and other life-threatening illnesses.
Scientific evidence has established a strong causal association between EtO exposure and the development of lymphohematopoietic cancers, such as lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoid cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Communities and workers exposed to long-term EtO emissions face an elevated risk of developing breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and other malignancies.
The carcinogenic risks of EtO have been acknowledged by leading health agencies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), National Toxicology Program (a division of the National Institute of Health), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The general population living near medical sterilization plants may have been unknowingly exposed to unsafe EtO levels for years, leading to severe health consequences.
Occupational exposure among workers handling EtO has also been tied to an increased risk of reproductive harm and immune system disorders.
Known human health effects of exposure to ethylene oxide include:
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with cancer or other serious health conditions after prolonged exposure to EtO emissions, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law today to discuss your legal options.
Exposed workers and communities living near facilities that emit toxic substances like ethylene oxide may experience a range of immediate and long-term health symptoms.
Respiratory irritation is one of the earliest signs of exposure, as EtO can cause inflammation and damage to the lungs.
Symptoms affecting the gastrointestinal tract, such as nausea and vomiting, have also been reported among individuals exposed to high levels of EtO.
Secondary effects of chronic exposure can include neurological issues, reproductive complications, and immune system suppression.
Many symptoms worsen with prolonged exposure, making early recognition critical for those living or working near EtO-emitting facilities.
Common symptoms of ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure include:
Extensive scientific research has established that ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure poses significant health risks to humans.
Occupational studies have demonstrated a clear association between EtO exposure and increased incidences of various cancers, particularly those affecting the lymphatic and hematopoietic systems.
Experimental animal studies have provided sufficient evidence of EtO’s carcinogenicity, reinforcing concerns about its impact on human health.
Beyond its carcinogenic properties, EtO exposure has been linked to adverse reproductive outcomes and neurological effects.
The following studies offer detailed insights into the health effects associated with EtO exposure:
Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a colorless, flammable gas with a slightly sweet odor, primarily used as a chemical intermediate in the production of ethylene glycol and other chemicals.
EtO is highly reactive and is used for its ability to penetrate various materials, making it an effective sterilizing agent.
EtO is particularly useful for sterilizing medical equipment and supplies that are sensitive to heat or moisture, such as certain plastics, electronics, and surgical instruments.
The use of EtO for sterilization dates back to the late 1950s, when it was developed as a method to ensure the sterility of medical devices without causing damage.
This method allows for the sterilization of complex and delicate instruments that cannot withstand traditional high-temperature steam sterilization.
EtO’s effectiveness against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi, has made it a widely adopted sterilization technique in the healthcare industry.
Despite its benefits, EtO is recognized as a human carcinogen, and exposure to it has been associated with various health risks, requiring strict regulatory controls and safety measures during its use.
Facilities utilizing EtO for sterilization are required to adhere to stringent guidelines to minimize emissions and protect both workers and surrounding communities from potential exposure.
Ongoing advancements aim to develop alternative sterilization methods; however, EtO remains a critical component in ensuring the sterility of many medical devices that cannot be effectively sterilized by other means.
Due to its classification as a human carcinogen and its potential environmental health impacts, EtO emissions are subject to stringent regulatory controls.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees these regulations under the Clean Air Act, aiming to mitigate toxic exposure and associated cancer risks.
In April 2024, the EPA finalized more stringent air emission standards to significantly reduce EtO emissions from commercial sterilizers, addressing concerns about uncontrolled industrial emissions and their health implications.
These regulatory actions are part of a broader effort to protect both workers and communities exposed to EtO.
The processing generally consists of implementing advanced emission control technologies and adhering to rigorous operational protocols to limit EtO release into the atmosphere.
Continuous monitoring and compliance assessments are integral components of these regulations.
Key Regulatory Actions on Ethylene Oxide Emissions:
These regulatory actions collectively aim to reduce EtO emissions, thereby protecting environmental health and minimizing the risk of cancer and other adverse effects among exposed populations.
Individuals who lived or worked near facilities emitting ethylene oxide (EtO) and have since been diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, or other serious health conditions may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Claims are being investigated against companies responsible for toxic exposure due to uncontrolled industrial emissions, failure to implement safety measures, and misleading the public about the cancer effects of EtO.
Workers in sterilization plants, residents in high-exposure areas, and individuals with prolonged contact with EtO may have legal options.
To qualify, claimants typically need medical records confirming a diagnosis of EtO-related cancer and evidence of exposure from living or working near an affected facility.
If you’ve been exposed to ethylene oxide emissions and subsequently developed cancer or other serious health problems, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
Building a strong Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit requires clear evidence and documentation linking toxic exposure to cancer effects or other serious health conditions.
Plaintiffs must provide medical records, proof of residence or employment near an EtO-emitting facility, and scientific evidence demonstrating the connection between EtO and their illness.
Legal teams also rely on regulatory violations, emission reports, and expert testimony to establish liability.
Your attorney will help to gather, retain, and organize crucial evidence for your case.
Evidence in an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit may include:
In a lawsuit, damages refer to the compensation awarded to victims for the physical, financial, and emotional losses they have suffered due to another party’s negligence.
In EtO exposure cases, individuals diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, or other serious illnesses may seek damages for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.
A lawyer can help assess and calculate damages, ensuring that all economic and non-economic losses are fully accounted for in a claim.
Legal teams also consider the long-term impact of the illness, including future medical costs, disability, and diminished quality of life.
Potential damages in an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit may include:
If you or a loved one have suffered due to EtO exposure, an experienced attorney can help you pursue the compensation you deserve.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free case evaluation.
TorHoerman Law is actively investigating claims from individuals diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses linked to ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
Communities near sterilization facilities have faced significant health risks due to toxic exposure. Companies responsible for emitting EtO have failed to protect workers and residents, and lawsuits are holding them accountable for the harm they have caused.
If you lived or worked near an EtO-emitting facility and later developed a related illness, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Our legal team is committed to fighting for victims and securing compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.
TorHoerman Law has a proven track record in environmental and toxic exposure litigation, helping individuals and families get the justice they deserve.
We offer free case evaluations to determine whether you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
There are no upfront costs—we only get paid if we win your case.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
Individuals who lived or worked near facilities emitting ethylene oxide (EtO) and later developed cancer or other serious health conditions may qualify to file a lawsuit.
Workers in sterilization plants, residents in high-exposure areas, and others with prolonged environmental or occupational exposure to EtO may be eligible.
Common illnesses linked to EtO exposure include breast cancer, leukemia (ALL, AML, CLL, Hairy Cell Leukemia), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Hodgkin lymphoma.
To qualify, plaintiffs typically need medical records confirming a diagnosis, proof of residence or employment near an EtO-emitting facility, and exposure documentation.
Lawsuits claim that companies like Sterigenics and other sterilization facilities negligently emitted EtO, failed to warn communities, and ignored known carcinogenic risks.
Those who lost a loved one to EtO-related cancer may also be eligible to file a wrongful death claim.
A legal team can evaluate your case and determine whether you meet the criteria to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
If you believe EtO exposure contributed to your illness, contact TorHoerman Law for a free case evaluation.
Yes, exposure to ethylene oxide (EtO) has been scientifically linked to an increased risk of cancer.
In 2016, the EPA classified EtO as carcinogenic to humans based on strong evidence from epidemiological studies, laboratory research, and genetic toxicity findings.
Studies have shown a positive exposure-response relationship, meaning that individuals with higher cumulative exposure levels face a greater cancer risk.
Occupational studies found increased cases of breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, myeloma, and lymphocytic leukemia among exposed workers.
Laboratory tests on experimental animals confirmed carcinogenic effects, with rats and mice exposed to EtO developing lymphoid tumors and mammary carcinomas after inhalation exposure.
The EPA’s risk estimates for cancer types combined indicate that even low levels of EtO exposure can increase the likelihood of developing cancer over a lifetime.
In occupational settings, long-term exposure at 8-hour time-weighted averages (TWA) over 35 years was associated with elevated cancer risks ranging from 3.7% to 11% (upper bound estimates up to 22%).
These findings reinforce the need for strict exposure limits and legal action for individuals who have been harmed by EtO emissions from sterilization facilities.
Ethylene oxide (EtO) is highly toxic, and even short-term exposure to high concentrations can cause serious health effects.
Brief exposures to 2,500 ppm did not cause lasting effects in some individuals, but exposures above 2,000 ppm have been linked to headaches, nausea, vomiting, respiratory irritation, and hematological abnormalities.
Severe exposure levels (above 4,000 ppm for 30 minutes or 8,000 ppm for 10 minutes) can result in significant injury or death, based on animal toxicity studies.
While 500 ppm for one hour was considered unlikely to cause immediate harm, chronic exposure to much lower levels over time has been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
The EPA has determined that long-term exposure to even small amounts of EtO can increase cancer risk, making consistent exposure near emitting facilities a serious concern.
Individuals working in sterilization plants or living near EtO-emitting facilities should take precautions and monitor for health effects linked to prolonged exposure.
Victims of ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure may seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages caused by toxic exposure.
Lawsuits against Sterigenics and other sterilization companies aim to hold them accountable for negligent emissions, failure to warn, and regulatory violations linked to increased cancer risks.
Plaintiffs may also pursue wrongful death claims if a loved one passed away due to EtO-related cancer or health complications.
Potential Compensation in an EtO Exposure Lawsuit:
If you or a loved one suffered health complications due to EtO exposure, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free case evaluation.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL