If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bike accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law will take a Sterigenics Ethylene Oxide Exposure case to trial in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2026.
The plaintiff in the upcoming trial is a Cobb County resident who lived near the facility and was unknowingly exposed to EtO emissions over the course of several years.
This case is part of a broader national effort to hold Sterigenics accountable for environmental contamination and resulting injuries in multiple communities.
The Sterigenics Lawsuit Atlanta focuses on claims from residents and workers near the Smyrna Sterigenics facility, alleging exposure to hazardous ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions linked to increased cancer risks and other serious health conditions.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit, helping individuals seek compensation for serious health conditions linked to ethylene oxide emissions from the Smyrna Sterigenics Plant.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Sterigenics Lawsuit Atlanta, the health effects of exposure to ethylene oxide emissions, why Sterigenics uses EtO to sterilize medical equipment, who qualifies for a Sterigenics Lawsuit, and much more.
Sterigenics, a medical sterilization company owned by Sotera Health LLC, has come under legal scrutiny for allegedly emitting hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its Smyrna, Georgia facility.
Residents and workers near the plant claim they were unknowingly exposed to EtO emissions, which have been linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious health conditions.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies EtO as a human carcinogen, and studies show that long-term exposure can lead to genetic damage and increased cancer risks.
Lawsuits argue that Sterigenics failed to meet regulatory requirements for emission control, allowing dangerous levels of EtO to pollute surrounding communities.
Despite mounting evidence and previous litigation in Illinois and Georgia, Sterigenics and Sotera Health LLC have denied wrongdoing while continuing to operate sterilization plants nationwide.
Plaintiffs are seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from long-term exposure.
The Sterigenics Lawsuit Atlanta is part of a broader effort to hold sterilization companies accountable for the public health risks posed by uncontrolled EtO emissions.
If you or a loved one lived or worked near the Smyrna Sterigenics facility and have been diagnosed with cancer or another EtO-related illness, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
TorHoerman Law’s Atlanta office is actively accepting claims from individuals who lived or worked near the Smyrna Sterigenics facility and have been diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, or other serious illnesses linked to ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
Our attorneys have decades of experience seeking compensation from powerful corporations that have harmed individuals.
We know what it takes to build a strong case, establish liability, gather scientific and medical evidence, and hold companies like Sterigenics accountable for the harm caused by toxic EtO emissions.
Reach out to us today.
A Georgia judge has declared a mistrial regarding punitive damages in a lawsuit that recently concluded with a $20 million compensatory award against C.R. Bard.
After a juror admitted they went along with the group without personally agreeing with the decision, the retrial will focus solely on punitive damages.
This retrial aims to hold Bard accountable for its alleged reckless disregard for public health at its sterilization plant in Covington, GA.
Plaintiff Gary Walker, a longtime resident near the facility and a former delivery driver for the site, developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after prolonged exposure to ethylene oxide.
The jury initially awarded $50 million in punitive damages, but that amount was voided after the juror disclosed it.
Judge Emily Brantley confirmed that a new trial will be held to determine whether Bard should be held financially responsible beyond compensatory damages.
Under Georgia law, jurors must find intent or conscious indifference to award punitive damages; however, juries are not informed about statutory caps.
A statutory cap is a legal limit on how much money someone can receive in a lawsuit, often used to restrict payouts for things like pain and suffering or punitive damages.
Walker’s case is part of a larger trend of litigation related to toxic ethylene oxide emissions from medical sterilization facilities.
In March 2024, the EPA issued updated safety standards that included continuous emissions monitoring and more stringent controls on sterilization equipment.
Despite calls for safer alternatives, the gas continues to be widely used in the U.S. medical supply chain.
TorHoerman Law will take a Sterigenics Ethylene Oxide Exposure case to trial in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2026.
The case involves allegations that Sterigenics, a medical sterilization company, released ethylene oxide (EtO), a known carcinogen, into the air surrounding its facility in Cobb County.
The plaintiff in the upcoming trial is a Cobb County resident who lived near the facility and was unknowingly exposed to EtO emissions over the course of several years.
The lawsuit alleges that Sterigenics failed to install proper environmental controls or emission scrubbers and vented EtO directly into a residential community.
EtO has been recognized for decades as a cancer-causing chemical.
The facility’s emissions reportedly continued without proper mitigation until within the last five years.
The lawsuit claims that Sterigenics did not notify the public of the potential dangers until after external scrutiny forced disclosure.
There were no town halls, mailers, or other efforts to inform residents prior to litigation.
Eligible claimants may include individuals who lived in the affected areas of Cobb County and later developed cancer or other serious illnesses linked to EtO exposure.
This case is part of a broader national effort to hold Sterigenics accountable for environmental contamination and resulting injuries in multiple communities.
A Georgia jury awarded $20 million on Friday to Gary Walker, a retired truck driver who claimed that exposure to ethylene oxide(EtO) from C.R. Bard’s Covington plant caused his lymphoma.
The jury found Bard liable for negligence and nuisance, concluding that punitive damages are warranted.
Thus, a second trial phase will begin on Monday, May 19.
Walker, now in remission, lived about 1.5 miles from the C.R. Bard facility starting in 1991 and made regular deliveries to the plant until retiring in 1999.
He was diagnosed with lymphoma in 2017 at the age of 68 and underwent ten rounds of chemotherapy along with a stem-cell transplant.
Walker’s legal team presented internal and regulatory documents showing that Bard had declined to implement emissions controls for decades, despite warnings from regulators and its EtO supplier, Union Carbide.
Jurors were presented with a 1985 memo from Georgia environmental officials stating that Bard “does not want to control its emissions at this time.”
In closing arguments, plaintiffs’ counsel Lindsay Forlines argued that Bard had “devices for control available” but “refused to employ them.”
The defense argued that Walker’s cancer was unrelated and stated that “no doctor ever told him that EtO had anything to do with his cancer,” according to closing statements by Eric Rumanek of Troutman Pepper Locke LLP.
This is the first EtO exposure case in Georgia to result in a plaintiff verdict, which may indicate considerable liability for Bard.
The punitive damages phase will resume on Monday, May 19, before Judge Emily Brantley.
On Tuesday, a Georgia jury began hearing claims that C.R. Bard’s medical sterilization plant in Covington exposed a resident to ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions for nearly 50 years, allegedly resulting in his cancer diagnosis.
Plaintiff Gary Walker, a retired truck driver, alleges that he developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma due to repeated occupational and residential exposure to EtO.
His attorneys informed jurors that the plant emitted nearly 10 million pounds of gas from 1970 to 2017, operated without emissions controls until 1990, and disregarded warnings from regulators and its EtO supplier, Union Carbide.
They presented a 1985 memo from Georgia officials stating that Bard “does not want to control its emissions at this time.”
Bard denies the claims and contends that Walker’s cancer resulted from a spontaneous genetic mutation unrelated to EtO.
The company adheres to regulatory standards and has implemented safety measures as federal requirements have evolved.
Defense counsel highlighted EtO’s role in sterilizing over half of all U.S. medical devices and referenced Bard’s use of safety monitoring and pollution controls.
This case marks the first exposure to ethylene oxide in Georgia to be presented before a jury.
Similar litigation is occurring in other states, following recent defense verdicts in Colorado and Pennsylvania.
Steris Corporation has agreed to pay up to $48.15 million to resolve a wave of personal injury claims tied to emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its former sterilization facility in Waukegan, Illinois.
The settlement, reached through its Isomedix subsidiary, aims to resolve nearly all pending lawsuits in Cook County Circuit Court involving claims of cancer and other health issues linked to EtO exposure.
The deal, disclosed in a March 2025 securities filing, comes after mounting legal and regulatory scrutiny surrounding EtO, a carcinogenic gas used to sterilize approximately half of all medical devices in the U.S.
The plaintiffs allege that emissions from the Waukegan site endangered public health between 2005 and 2008, when Steris operated the facility.
While Steris emphasized that the agreement does not admit liability or concede that emissions posed a safety risk, it agreed to the payout to resolve the cases efficiently.
The company stated it will record the settlement as a charge in its fiscal 2025 earnings but exclude it from adjusted earnings metrics.
The first EtO lawsuit against Steris ended in a mistrial earlier this year.
Now, the proposed settlement is pending court approval and hinges on a substantial majority of plaintiffs opting in.
Should those conditions not be met, Isomedix retains the right to withdraw from the agreement and continue defending itself in court.
The Environmental Protection Agency has flagged multiple EtO sterilization facilities nationwide as high cancer risk sites.
In response, it has tightened emission regulations, while medical device manufacturers and sterilization companies work to adopt safer alternatives, such as vaporized hydrogen peroxide.
Steris remains one of the world’s largest medical device sterilization providers through its Applied Sterilization Technologies unit, which absorbed the Isomedix brand.
Braun, a German medical device manufacturer, has reached a confidential settlement to resolve the majority of lawsuits alleging that emissions from its Lehigh County, Pennsylvania facility exposed residents to toxic levels of ethylene oxide, a gas linked to cancer and neurological damage.
Dozens of lawsuits had been filed by local residents claiming that emissions from the plant caused elevated cancer risks and other serious health effects.
The plaintiffs alleged that long-term exposure to ethylene oxide—a chemical used to sterilize medical equipment—led to increased diagnoses of breast cancer, lymphoma, and other illnesses.
Though the company denies wrongdoing, B. Braun confirmed the settlement this week and stated that it will continue defending itself against any remaining claims. Details of the settlement remain confidential.
In response to the litigation and public health concerns, B. Braun noted that it installed a new emission control system in 2020 that reduced ethylene oxide emissions by more than 99.9%.
The move was made voluntarily and went beyond regulatory requirements, the company said.
The settlement comes amid a broader national reckoning over ethylene oxide use.
In March 2024, the EPA issued stricter rules for commercial sterilization facilities, including continuous air monitoring and limits on emissions during equipment start-up and shutdown.
These rules apply to approximately 90 sterilization facilities across the U.S.
The lawsuits against B. Braun are part of a growing wave of litigation targeting medical sterilization companies.
In 2023, Sterigenics agreed to a $408 million settlement over similar ethylene oxide exposure claims in Illinois, Georgia, and Michigan. Another company, Steris, is currently facing hundreds of similar lawsuits.
Although ethylene oxide is still used to sterilize about half of all U.S. medical equipment, advocates and health experts continue to call for safer alternatives.
The outcome of these cases—and increasing public scrutiny—may pressure both manufacturers and regulators to accelerate the transition to safer sterilization technologies.
Cosmed Group Inc., a medical and food sterilization company, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection following a wave of lawsuits alleging its use of ethylene oxide (EtO) caused cancer and other serious health conditions.
The bankruptcy filing, made in Houston, Texas, comes in response to at least 300 lawsuits, including two class actions.
Plaintiffs allege exposure to ethylene oxide emissions from Cosmed facilities led to long-term health risks, particularly in surrounding communities.
Ethylene oxide is a known human carcinogen used in sterilizing medical devices and food products like spices and grains.
During a court hearing, Cosmed’s attorney David Eastlake acknowledged that litigation tied to both current and former facility operations had threatened the company’s viability.
The lawsuits span several jurisdictions and relate to alleged injuries from airborne emissions over extended periods.
Cosmed also filed alongside an affiliate, Spicey Partners Real Estate Holdings, listing more than $100 million in liabilities.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez approved an emergency motion allowing the company to cover a $65,000 payroll for its 51 employees, while additional operational requests will be considered in future hearings.
This isn’t Cosmed’s first encounter with environmental scrutiny. In 2005, the company paid a $1.5 million settlement following a U.S. EPA probe into EtO emissions at facilities across six states.
The bankruptcy move follows similar legal pressures faced by other sterilization companies in recent years, as regulators and communities increase scrutiny over the health impact of ethylene oxide.
Cosmed has not yet announced whether it intends to pursue a global settlement as part of its Chapter 11 proceedings.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have agreed to a $35 million settlement to resolve a group of lawsuits alleging that emissions from the company’s Cobb County, Georgia facility caused cancer and other serious health problems.
The deal marks a pivotal moment in the growing wave of ethylene oxide litigation across the state.
The lead plaintiff in the settled case developed leukemia at the age of 20 after living for 13 years near the Sterigenics medical sterilization plant.
Filed in 2020, the plaintiff’s lawsuit argued that prolonged exposure to airborne ethylene oxide—a known carcinogen—was the likely cause of his illness.
Ethylene oxide is used to sterilize medical equipment due to its DNA-disrupting properties, but those same properties are linked to cancer in humans.
According to the CDC and NIH, the compound is associated with heightened risks of leukemia, lymphoma, and other cancers through inhalation and environmental exposure.
The plaintiff’s lawsuit, one of the first in Georgia targeting Sterigenics’ emissions, paved the way for broader legal scrutiny.
The plaintiff is now in remission and recently completed his degree from the University of Utah.
Under the terms of the conditional settlement, all plaintiffs involved must agree for the deal to take effect.
While Sterigenics and Sotera deny any wrongdoing or liability, they agreed to the payout to resolve the claims and avoid ongoing litigation.
This settlement does not resolve all outstanding legal challenges.
The companies intend to continue defending against additional personal injury and property value lawsuits, including upcoming hearings scheduled for October 2024 that will examine general causation evidence.
The $35 million agreement may influence the trajectory of other ethylene oxide cases in Georgia and nationwide, particularly as plaintiffs argue that emissions from sterilization plants pose an unacceptable public health risk.
The EPA’s Final Rule for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) and polymer and resin manufacturing sectors aims to drastically reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants, especially ethylene oxide (EtO) and chloroprene, which are both known human carcinogens.
Key Highlights of the Final Rule:
Monitoring Requirements: Facilities will be required to conduct fenceline monitoring for specific air toxics, including EtO and chloroprene, with the data made publicly accessible to inform and protect nearby communities.
After years of mounting scientific evidence and growing public alarm, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing its first major update in over a decade to safety rules governing ethylene oxide (EtO)—a toxic gas linked to cancer that is used to sterilize about 50% of all medical devices in the United States.
The final rule, expected to be released by the March 1 court-ordered deadline, will establish stricter emissions limits for commercial sterilization facilities and enhanced worker safety protocols for those routinely exposed to EtO.
Mounting Health Concerns Drive Urgency
The move follows an EPA 2016 risk assessment that found EtO to be far more carcinogenic than previously understood.
The gas, already recognized by the CDC and NIH as a human carcinogen, is linked to breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia, among others.
Children and those living near sterilizing plants are particularly vulnerable.
Communities across the U.S., including in Laredo, TX, Covington, GA, and suburban Chicago, have rallied against nearby sterilization plants after learning they had been exposed to dangerous levels of the gas for decades—often without warning. Lawsuits and protests have followed.
One high-profile case in Georgia recently resulted in a $35 million settlement from Sterigenics and parent company Sotera, while another in Illinois awarded $363 million to a breast cancer survivor.
The finalized EPA rule is expected to include:
However, critics say the rule falls short by not requiring air monitoring around facilities or addressing EtO emissions from off-site warehouses, where sterilized products continue to off-gas.
While environmental and public health advocates view the rule as long overdue, industry groups warn of disruption.
The Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) says companies could face over $500 million in compliance costs, potentially slowing sterilization workflows and impacting medical device availability.
The FDA has expressed concern, warning that overly restrictive rules could hinder access to essential medical supplies.
Ethylene oxide is still considered the most reliable method for sterilizing complex devices, and alternatives like steam, radiation, or hydrogen peroxide vapor are not always viable.
Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have reached a $408 million settlement with 879 individuals who filed lawsuits alleging that emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from the company’s now-closed Willowbrook, Illinois facility caused cancer and other health complications.
The agreement resolves nearly all of the 882 cases pending against the company, which stemmed from the EPA’s 2018 detection of dangerously high concentrations of EtO in the air surrounding the Willowbrook site.
In 2019, the state ordered the facility closed.
Since then, the area has become one of several so-called “cancer alleys” where local residents allege long-term exposure to EtO led to serious illnesses.
EtO is a sterilizing gas used in roughly half of all U.S. medical devices.
While essential to infection control, it’s also a known human carcinogen, with chronic exposure linked to leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, and other conditions.
Children are considered particularly vulnerable due to EtO’s mutagenic effects on DNA.
The decision to settle follows a landmark 2022 jury verdict in which Sterigenics was ordered to pay $220 million to a single plaintiff, breast cancer survivor Susan Kamuda. Sotera and Griffith Foods, its corporate predecessor, were also hit with large penalties, pushing the total to $363 million.
The staggering award likely influenced the company’s decision to settle the rest of the Illinois claims rather than risk similar outcomes at trial.
Although Sterigenics denies wrongdoing and maintains its Willowbrook operations did not pose a safety risk, the company acknowledged the financial risk of continuing litigation.
Before taxes, the average payout per claimant under the agreement would be approximately $545,000.
Three plaintiffs opted out of the settlement and will proceed through pretrial discovery.
This resolution does not mark the end of Sterigenics’ EtO litigation.
The company still faces lawsuits in Georgia and New Mexico over similar allegations.
Additionally, new EPA regulations aimed at drastically reducing EtO emissions and greater scrutiny from both federal and state agencies suggest future legal and regulatory challenges are likely.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit instantly.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has launched a nationwide initiative to inform communities about the health risks associated with ethylene oxide (EtO), a toxic gas used to sterilize roughly half of all U.S. medical devices.
The campaign includes updated risk data, public webinars, and community meetings for residents near nearly 100 commercial sterilization facilities.
Of these, 23 sites have been identified as posing elevated lifetime cancer risks due to long-term EtO exposure.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan emphasized the agency’s commitment to transparency and public engagement, particularly in areas with the highest risk.
EtO exposure is linked to breast cancer, leukemia, and other severe conditions.
While short-term levels don’t exceed health benchmarks, the EPA’s primary concern is cumulative, long-term exposure, especially for children and workers.
To address this, the EPA collects emissions data, reviews Clean Air Act regulations, and prepares stricter pollution control requirements for sterilization plants.
It also coordinates with the FDA to ensure that medical device availability is not compromised.
In a major step toward transparency and environmental justice, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it is expanding Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements to include 29 previously unregulated sterilization facilities that use large amounts of ethylene oxide (EtO).
EtO is a known human carcinogen, with links to breast cancer, leukemia, and other severe health conditions.
The new reporting rule will also apply to ethylene glycol, a related chemical.
The EPA’s move comes after years of concerns from community advocates about undisclosed EtO emissions near residential areas, schools, and historically underserved communities.
Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), the EPA is using discretionary authority to mandate that these facilities report emissions and waste management data for EtO and ethylene glycol starting in 2023, based on activities tracked from January 2022.
The 29 selected facilities are among the highest EtO users in the contract sterilization sector and will likely exceed the TRI threshold of 10,000 pounds per year.
Two facilities originally considered were exempted—one no longer performs sterilization, and the other uses EtO in minimal quantities.
Sterigenics, a medical sterilization company owned by Sotera Health LLC, operates a facility in Smyrna, Georgia, within Cobb County.
This plant utilizes ethylene oxide (EtO), a chemical classified as a human carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to sterilize medical equipment.
In 2019, reports revealed that the facility had been emitting significant levels of EtO, raising concerns about potential health risks for nearby residents and workers.
In response to these findings, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) approved plans for Sterigenics to install new anti-pollution controls aimed at significantly reducing EtO emissions from the Smyrna facility.
Despite these measures, community apprehension persisted, leading to lawsuits against the company.
In October 2023, Sterigenics agreed to a $35 million settlement to resolve 79 claims filed by Cobb County residents who alleged that EtO emissions from the plant caused health issues, including various cancers.
Sterigenics has maintained that its operations did not pose a safety risk to the surrounding community and that they were in compliance with federal and state regulations.
A Sterigenics statement emphasized that the settlement was not an admission of liability but a strategic decision to avoid prolonged litigation.
Cobb County officials have been actively involved in monitoring the situation, attempting to ensure that the facility adheres to safety and compliance standards to protect public health.
Our law firm is actively investigating claims against the Sterigenics plant in Smyrna for indiviudals who were exposed to ethylene oxide emissions and developed related health problems, including cancer.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation, or use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify to join the Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuit instantly.
The EPA’s 2018 National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) identified the Sterigenics facility in Smyrna, Georgia as a potential high-risk area for ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD) conducted modeling in 2019, confirming EtO emissions exceeded acceptable risk levels, even after Sterigenics proposed emission control upgrades.
Ambient air monitoring conducted around the Smyrna facility detected EtO levels ranging from 0.21 to 3.6 micrograms per cubic meter.
For context, the EPA considers 0.02 micrograms per cubic meter as the level of EtO in the air that, over many years, could cause 100 additional cancer cases per 1 million people.
Regulatory agencies have inspected Sterigenics’ operations and compliance history, with detailed reports available through GA EPD and the EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database.
Despite emission control upgrades, community concerns persist, and the EPA is developing new risk estimates for EtO sterilization facilities nationwide, aiming to strengthen regulatory oversight.
The Sterigenics Cobb County plant, located at 2971 Olympic Industrial Dr SE #116, Atlanta, GA 30339, has been a focal point of environmental health discussions due to its ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions.
In August 2018, the EPA’s National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) identified several census tracts near this facility with potentially elevated cancer risks associated with continuous EtO exposure over a 70-year period.
Individuals residing or working within a one-mile radius of the Sterigenics facility, encompassing parts of Smyrna, Vinings, and nearby Atlanta neighborhoods, may have experienced elevated EtO exposure levels.
While the Sterigenics facility has implemented measures to reduce EtO emissions, historical data indicates that individuals within the immediate vicinity, particularly within a one-mile radius, may have been at an increased risk of EtO exposure.
Long-term exposure to ethylene oxide (EtO) has been associated with an increased risk of severe health conditions, particularly various cancers and neurological disorders.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies EtO as a human carcinogen, with studies showing a strong correlation between chronic exposure and elevated cancer rates in both workers and nearby residents.
Individuals who have lived or worked near sterilization facilities emitting EtO may face heightened risks of developing breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
EtO exposure can cause immune system suppression, reproductive toxicity, and genetic damage, leading to long-term health complications.
Workers in sterilization plants, industrial employees, and community members exposed to airborne EtO are among those most at risk.
Medical Conditions Linked to EtO Exposure:
Exposure to ethylene oxide (EtO) can cause a range of symptoms, from acute respiratory irritation to long-term neurological and immune system effects.
Individuals exposed to high EtO levels in industrial settings or communities near sterilization facilities may experience both immediate and chronic health issues.
Short-term symptoms often include respiratory distress, skin irritation, and dizziness, while prolonged exposure has been linked to memory loss, impaired coordination, and nerve damage.
Over time, EtO exposure may weaken the immune system, increasing susceptibility to infections and other serious health conditions.
Workers and residents living near EtO-emitting facilities should be aware of these symptoms and seek medical attention if they experience ongoing health issues.
Common Symptoms of EtO Exposure:
You may qualify for a Sterigenics Atlanta lawsuit if you lived, worked, or attended school near the Smyrna facility and have since been diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, or another serious illness linked to ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
The Cobb County plant was found to have released EtO emissions at levels exceeding health safety thresholds, putting nearby residents and workers at increased risk.
Lawsuits allege that Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health LLC, failed to warn the public, violated regulatory requirements, and allowed dangerous levels of a known carcinogen to persist in the community.
To determine your eligibility, legal teams will review your medical history, proximity to the plant, duration of exposure, and other supporting evidence.
Both individual injury claims and wrongful death lawsuits are being evaluated.
TorHoerman Law’s Atlanta office is currently reviewing cases and offering free consultations for those affected.
Our attorneys are helping to gather evidence to build strong cases, and assess damages to make sure that plaintiffs have the best chances of receiving adequate compensation.
To support an ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure claim, individuals must provide evidence and documentation that connects their medical condition to toxic emissions from a facility like Sterigenics in Smyrna.
This includes medical records, proof of residence or employment near the facility, and scientific or regulatory data showing elevated EtO levels in the area.
Our attorneys can help collect and organize the necessary evidence to build a strong case.
Evidence in a case may include:
In a lawsuit, damages refer to the financial compensation awarded to individuals who have suffered physical, emotional, or economic harm due to someone else’s negligence.
In Ethylene Oxide Exposure Lawsuits, damages are sought to address the medical, financial, and personal losses resulting from cancer or other serious health conditions linked to toxic emissions.
Victims may be entitled to compensation for both economic costs (like medical bills and lost income) and non-economic losses (like pain, suffering, and loss of quality of life).
Types of Damages That May Be Recovered:
If you believe exposure to EtO has caused your illness, an experienced attorney can help calculate your damages and pursue fair compensation.
Several high-profile lawsuits have been filed across the country against companies accused of emitting dangerous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO) into nearby communities.
One of the most significant cases involved the Sterigenics Willowbrook Facility in Illinois, which faced intense public scrutiny and legal action after reports linked its EtO emissions to increased cancer rates in the surrounding area.
In 2022, a Cook County jury awarded $363 million to a plaintiff who developed breast cancer after years of exposure to EtO from the Willowbrook plant.
That verdict set a precedent, leading to a $408 million global settlement in early 2023, resolving hundreds of lawsuits from other Illinois residents.
In Georgia, Sterigenics agreed to settle 79 lawsuits for $35 million in 2023, compensating Cobb County residents who claimed their cancers were caused by toxic EtO emissions from the company’s Smyrna facility.
These cases underscore the serious health risks associated with EtO and the growing legal momentum to hold companies accountable.
Plaintiffs allege that companies like Sterigenics failed to warn the public, ignored well-established scientific evidence, and allowed dangerous exposure to continue for years.
As lawsuits continue to be filed in multiple states, courts are recognizing the real and lasting harm caused by long-term EtO exposure.
If you were exposed to EtO near a sterilization facility and have been diagnosed with cancer or another serious illness, you may have grounds for a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law to find out if you qualify.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting clients who lived, worked, or spent significant time near the Sterigenics facility in Smyrna, Georgia and have since been diagnosed with cancer or other serious health conditions linked to ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure.
We have decades of experience holding large corporations accountable for environmental and public health violations.
If you’ve been affected, you may be eligible to seek compensation for medical bills, lost income, and personal suffering.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case evaluation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a Sterigenics Lawsuit Atlanta instantly.
The Sterigenics plant in Smyrna/Atlanta is located at 2971 Olympic Industrial Drive SE, Suite #116, Atlanta, GA 30339.
This facility sits within Cobb County, near the Smyrna-Vinings area.
The Sterigenics plant in Smyrna has been the subject of lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny due to ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions linked to increased cancer risks in the surrounding communities.
It is one of several commercial sterilization plants in the U.S. that use EtO to sterilize medical equipment.
Individuals who lived, worked, or spent significant time near facilities emitting ethylene oxide (EtO)—like Sterigenics in Smyrna—may qualify to file a lawsuit if they were later diagnosed with cancer or other serious health conditions linked to EtO exposure.
To qualify, you must show a connection between your exposure and your medical diagnosis, supported by documentation and evidence.
Legal claims may also be filed on behalf of loved ones who passed away due to EtO-related illnesses.
You may qualify if you:
If you believe your illness may be linked to EtO exposure, contact TorHoerman Law for a free case review.
According to a page titled “Safeguarding Global Health” on Sterigenics Atlanta’s website, the company maintains that its ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization processes are safe, heavily regulated, and critical to the medical supply chain.
Sterigenics has stated that it complies with all applicable federal and state environmental and safety regulations, and that its operations are conducted under permits issued by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD).
The company emphasizes that EtO is an FDA-authorized method for sterilizing medical equipment and defends its use as essential for protecting patient health.
Sterigenics continues to vigorously defend itself against claims of exposure and health risks linked to its Smyrna facility.
Yes, ethylene oxide (EtO) exposure can be dangerous even at low levels over extended periods of time. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), chronic inhalation of EtO—at levels once considered safe—has been linked to an increased risk of cancer, genetic damage, and immune system suppression.
The EPA’s updated risk assessments show that long-term exposure to EtO concentrations as low as 0.02 micrograms per cubic meter may cause cancer in 1 out of every 10,000 people, exceeding the EPA’s acceptable risk threshold.
This is particularly concerning for residents living near sterilization plants, where low-level emissions can accumulate in the environment over time.
Because of this, even individuals without direct occupational contact with EtO may be at risk if they live near a facility like Sterigenics in Smyrna, Georgia.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL