If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bike accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
The Ozempic lawsuit centers on allegations that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about serious risks associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 medications.
Plaintiffs allege the drug has been linked to severe gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis, as well as vision loss and other complications that have disrupted patients’ health, nutrition, employment, and daily functioning.
If you or a loved one developed gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, severe vomiting, vision loss, or other serious complications after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication, you may have legal options.
Dupixent lawsuits allege that patients treated with dupilumab therapy later developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can closely resemble severe eczema.
Research and published case reports have raised questions about whether some patients with atopic dermatitis face a higher risk of developing CTCL compared to similar patients who did not receive the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn patients and physicians about the possibility that Dupixent could worsen, accelerate, or reveal previously undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
If you or a loved one has suffered a severe reaction or blood cancer linked to Dupixent, you may be eligible to take action and file a Dupixent lawsuit.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
Legal claims against manufacturers and distributors of generic Acetaminophen have been investigated on behalf of pregnant women who used Tylenol during pregnancy and children who developed disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, and more.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting and reviewing Tylenol lawsuit claims.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims allege that these devices are defectively designed and improperly marketed without adequate warnings, leading to severe injuries for patients.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving spinal cord stimulators that allegedly caused serious injury instead of the relief patients were led to expect.
If you or a loved one experienced complications following spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to pursue compensation through a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Roblox lawsuit claims center on allegations that the platform allowed predators to groom, exploit, and abuse children through unsafe design and inadequate protections.
TorHoerman Law is dedicated to helping families who believe their child was harmed on Roblox pursue justice and financial recovery.
For many families, legal action represents both a path to compensation and a way to demand systemic change in how Roblox treats the safety of its youngest players.
If your child was sexually abused, exploited, or exposed to harmful content through Roblox, you may be eligible to take legal action by filing a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Olympus Scope lawsuit claims center on allegations that certain reusable Olympus endoscopes and related accessories exposed patients to dangerous bacterial contamination after medical procedures.
These infections can lead to hospitalization, IV antibiotic treatment, sepsis, organ failure, and death, leaving many patients with serious medical complications and lasting physical harm.
You may qualify to file an Olympus scope lawsuit if you underwent an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure involving Olympus equipment and later developed a serious bacterial infection.
Families who lost a loved one after infection-related complications linked to an Olympus scope procedure may also be able to pursue a wrongful death claim.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Breast mesh lawsuits involve allegations that certain mesh products used during breast reconstruction, augmentation, and lift procedures contributed to postoperative complications and the need for revision surgeries.
Patients who experienced complications after mesh-assisted breast procedures have reported chronic pain, reconstruction problems, cosmetic deformities, and additional revision surgeries.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications after breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra technique, you may be eligible to pursue a breast mesh lawsuit claim for the harm caused.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit claims that defective implantable ports have caused patients to suffer dangerous fractures, blood clots, and infections due to the breakdown of the catheter’s material inside the body.
These failures can lead to life-threatening complications such as embolism, sepsis, or the need for surgical removal of the device.
If you or a loved one experienced severe complications such as blood clots, infections, or catheter fractures requiring surgery due to a defective AngioDynamics port catheter, you may be eligible to file an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit and seek compensation.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Nitrous oxide lawsuit claims center on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who profit from selling canisters that are widely misused as a recreational drug.
Reports link this misuse to severe neurological injuries, psychiatric symptoms, hypoxia, and deaths caused by accidents or overdose.
These cases are rapidly expanding as more evidence emerges of the profound physical, psychological, and social toll caused by nitrous oxide misuse.
If you or a loved one has suffered brain injuries, spinal cord or nerve damage, psychiatric symptoms, or even death linked to misused nitrous oxide, you may be eligible to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit claim and seek compensation for the harm caused.
Diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit claims center on allegations that repeated inhalation of butter-flavoring chemicals in certain workplaces, including diacetyl and related substitutes, caused permanent and preventable airway damage.
Popcorn lung, medically known as bronchiolitis obliterans or constrictive bronchiolitis, is a serious obstructive lung disease that scars and narrows the small airways, leaving many people with persistent shortness of breath, chronic cough, and reduced exercise tolerance.
TorHoerman Law has experience handling diacetyl popcorn lung cases and is currently reviewing claims from workers who believe occupational exposure to these flavoring chemicals contributed to their diagnosis.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with diacetyl induced lung disease or bronchiolitis obliterans, you may have grounds to pursue a diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit for the harm caused to your lung tissue and long-term lung function.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
The Missouri personal injury statute of limitations is the deadline for filing a lawsuit after an injury caused by another party’s negligence or wrongful conduct.
Missing the correct filing deadline can prevent the claim from moving forward in court, even when liability and damages are well supported.
In Missouri, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases is generally five years from the date of the injury, as outlined in Missouri Revised Statutes Section 516.120.
TorHoerman Law can review the facts of your case and explain which Missouri filing deadline may apply.
Missouri gives many personal injury plaintiffs more time to file than other states, but the five-year rule does not apply to every injury case.
Wrongful death, medical malpractice, intentional torts, and claims involving government defendants may involve shorter deadlines or additional procedural requirements.
Insurance negotiations, ongoing medical treatment, and unresolved settlement discussions do not pause the filing deadline.
A claim can lose legal value while the injured person is still gathering records, completing treatment, or waiting for an insurance company to respond.
Missouri also uses a “capable of ascertainment” standard, which can affect when the clock starts in cases involving delayed injuries or injuries that were not immediately linked to another party’s conduct.
The deadline analysis should account for the type of claim, the date the injury became reasonably knowable, the defendant involved, and any special statute that may apply.
Missing the correct deadline can allow the defense to seek dismissal before liability, damages, or settlement value are ever considered.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries in Missouri and have questions about how long you have to file a lawsuit, TorHoerman Law can review the facts of the case and explain which filing deadlines and procedural rules may apply.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a personal injury case under Missouri law.
Most negligence-based personal injury claims filed in Missouri courts fall under § 516.120(4), which generally provides five years to file a lawsuit.
This rule commonly applies to car accidents, slip and falls, dog bites, premises liability claims, and many other injury cases based on another party’s negligence.
Missouri’s civil court system handles these cases as claims for monetary damages, separate from any criminal prosecution that may arise from the same incident.
A criminal case may punish unlawful conduct, but a civil claim is the path for an injured person to seek compensation for medical bills, lost income, pain, and other documented losses.
The five-year filing period is longer than the deadline used in many states, but it is not universal.

Medical malpractice, wrongful death, intentional torts, and claims involving government entities may involve shorter deadlines, separate notice requirements, or different accrual rules.
Applying the wrong deadline can prevent a claim from moving forward, even when the underlying injury and liability evidence are strong.
Most negligence-based civil actions for bodily injury in Missouri fall under the five-year statute of limitations in § 516.120(4).
This deadline generally applies when a person is injured because of someone else’s negligence and no more specific statute sets a shorter filing period.

The five-year period commonly applies to:
Workers compensation claims are different.
Missouri workplace injury claims are generally handled through the workers’ compensation system under Chapter 287, not through the ordinary civil lawsuit process against an employer.
Medical malpractice, wrongful death, intentional torts, and claims involving government entities may also follow separate deadlines or procedural rules.
Assault, battery, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel, and slander generally fall under Missouri’s two-year limitations statute rather than the five-year personal injury rule.
In many Missouri personal injury cases, the filing period begins when the injury and its cause are reasonably identifiable.
For a crash, fall, dog bite, or other incident with immediate injuries, the deadline usually runs from the date the accident happened.
Missouri law uses a “capable of ascertainment” standard under § 516.100.

This means the clock may start when the injury and its connection to another party’s conduct are reasonably capable of being discovered, not necessarily when the full extent of harm is known.
Delayed symptoms, latent injuries, or injuries with unclear causes may require a closer review of when a reasonable person would have had enough information to investigate a legal claim.
Missouri does not always start the statute of limitations on the date of the accident or wrongful act.
Under § 516.100, the filing period begins when the injury is “sustained and capable of ascertainment,” meaning the injury and its likely connection to another party’s conduct are reasonably knowable.
This rule can matter when harm is not immediately apparent, such as delayed spinal symptoms after a crash, a medical complication discovered months later, or an illness later connected to toxic exposure.
The test is objective.

It asks when a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have enough information to investigate a possible legal claim.
Missouri courts have explained that the clock does not begin merely because the wrongful act occurred.
The deadline begins when the available facts would place a reasonably prudent person on notice of a potentially actionable injury.
Knowing that an injury exists may not be enough if the connection to another party’s conduct is not yet reasonably apparent.
Five years is the default, not the universal rule.
Several common categories of injury cases run on shorter clocks under the Missouri statute of limitations framework.

Certain personal injury cases in Missouri may have significantly shorter deadlines than the standard terms.
Following the wrong statute can end a case before it begins.
Medical malpractice claims in Missouri generally must be filed within two years from the date of the alleged negligent act under § 516.105.
Missouri does not apply a broad discovery rule to every medical malpractice case, so the deadline usually does not wait until the patient discovers the injury.
The statute creates limited discovery-based exceptions.
If a foreign object was negligently left in the body, the claim must be filed within two years from when the negligence was discovered or should have been discovered.
A similar discovery-based rule applies when the claim involves a negligent failure to inform the patient of medical test results.

Missouri also imposes a 10-year statute of repose, which can bar a medical malpractice claim even if the injury was discovered later.
Minors have separate rules under § 516.105, and wrongful death claims based on medical malpractice may involve a different deadline.
Because these rules are narrower than the general personal injury statute, medical malpractice deadlines should be reviewed quickly.
Missouri wrongful death claims generally must be filed within three years from the date of death under § 537.100.
These claims arise when a person dies because of another person’s negligence, wrongful act, neglect, or default, with the right to sue created by § 537.080.
The three-year filing period begins on the date of death, not necessarily the date of the underlying injury.
For example, if a person survives for several weeks after a crash and later dies from those injuries, the wrongful death deadline typically runs from the date of death.
Missouri law also limits who may bring the claim.

Section 537.080 gives priority first to the surviving spouse, children, grandchildren, or parents of the deceased.
If no Class 1 claimant exists, the right may pass to siblings or their descendants, and if no eligible family member is available, the court may appoint a plaintiff ad litem to pursue the claim.
Wrongful death claims should be filed in the name of a legally authorized claimant under the statute.
Questions involving standing, class priority, or substitution of parties can create procedural disputes that affect whether the case may proceed.
Missouri recognizes certain exceptions that can pause or affect the statute of limitations in limited situations.
These rules are narrower than many people expect, and some exceptions that appear broad in the statute are heavily restricted by later court decisions.
Criminal charges arising from the same incident do not pause the civil filing deadline, and ongoing investigations do not extend the time to file a lawsuit.
Tolling rules also do not apply uniformly across all case types, particularly in medical malpractice litigation.

Certain exceptions may include:
Several common steps may help document or value a claim, but they do not pause Missouri’s statute of limitations.
The filing deadline applies to the lawsuit filed in court, not the insurance claim, medical treatment timeline, or settlement discussions.
A person can still lose the right to sue even while an adjuster is communicating, treatment is ongoing, or the full medical picture is still developing.

The filing deadline is not extended by:
If a lawsuit is not filed before the applicable deadline, the court may dismiss the case before the facts are ever considered.
In many cases, dismissal on statute-of-limitations grounds prevents the injured person from pursuing compensation for those injuries through the civil legal process.
Once the filing period has expired, the insurer usually has little reason to continue settlement discussions because the threat of litigation is gone.
Delay can also weaken the evidence needed to prove the claim.
Physical evidence may be repaired, discarded, or lost, surveillance footage may be overwritten, and accident reports from older incidents can become harder to obtain.

Witness statements are usually stronger when collected close to the event, before memories fade or details become harder to confirm.
Prompt action helps preserve legal rights and gives the case more time for investigation, medical record collection, and liability analysis.
The injuries suffered must still be connected to the incident through documentation, treatment records, and evidence of causation.
A case filed on time is not automatically successful, but a missed deadline can end the claim before liability or damages are reviewed.
A missed filing deadline can prevent an injured person from pursuing legal action, even when the evidence strongly supports the claim.
TorHoerman Law can review the facts, identify the Missouri deadline that applies, and determine whether any shorter filing rule or procedural requirement may affect the case.
A personal injury lawyer can also evaluate medical bills, lost wages, insurance issues, and the evidence needed to pursue fair compensation.

If you were injured in Missouri and need legal help understanding your filing deadline, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
No.
Missouri’s five-year statute of limitations under § 516.120(4) applies to many negligence-based personal injury claims, but several important categories follow different deadlines.
Medical malpractice claims are generally subject to a two-year statute with a separate 10-year statute of repose, while wrongful death claims must usually be filed within three years of the date of death.
Many intentional tort claims, including assault and battery, follow a two-year limitations period under Missouri law.
Claims involving cities, public entities, or government agencies may also involve shorter deadlines or additional procedural requirements.
In some situations, the filing deadline can differ between defendants depending on the claims asserted and the statutes that apply to each party.
Missouri also uses a “capable of ascertainment” standard under § 516.100.
In cases involving delayed injuries or injuries that were not immediately linked to another party’s conduct, the filing period may begin when the injury and its cause became reasonably discoverable rather than strictly on the date of the accident.
Under Missouri law, the general rule is that a wrongful death lawsuit must be filed within three years from the date of death under § 537.100.
This statute of limitations applies even if the underlying injury happened earlier, which means the filing period is not based solely on the date of the accident itself.
In such case, the legal deadline usually begins when the person dies from the injuries, not when the original incident occurred.
Missouri wrongful death claims arise in cases ranging from car crashes and trucking collisions to medical negligence and unsafe property conditions, from St. Louis to Kansas City.
Because wrongful death claims also involve statutory rules about who may file the lawsuit, the timing and procedural requirements should be reviewed carefully before the deadline expires.
Yes, Missouri recognizes a limited discovery-rule concept through its “capable of ascertainment” standard under § 516.100.
In many personal injury cases, the statute of limitations begins when the injury and its likely cause are reasonably discoverable, not necessarily on the exact date the wrongful act occurred.
This issue often arises in cases involving delayed symptoms, toxic exposure, medical complications, or defective products where the connection between the injury and another party’s conduct may not be immediately clear.
Missouri courts apply an objective standard that looks at when a reasonably prudent person would have had enough information to investigate a possible claim.
The rule does not wait until every medical detail or long-term consequence becomes fully known.
In Missouri, the statute of limitations may be paused when the injured party is under the age of 21 at the time of the accident.
Under § 516.170, many negligence-based personal injury claims do not begin running until the minor reaches legal adulthood.
In general, this means the filing period may start when the injured person turns 21, although different rules can apply in medical malpractice and other specialized claims.
Because tolling rules and exceptions vary by claim type, cases involving injured minors should still be reviewed as early as possible.
No.
Filing an insurance claim does not stop or extend the statute of limitations for a personal injury lawsuit in Missouri.
The legal deadline applies to the lawsuit filed in court, not to settlement discussions or communications with an insurance adjuster.
A person can lose the right to sue even while negotiations are ongoing or while the insurance company continues requesting records and documentation.
Settlement offers made near the deadline also do not preserve the claim if a lawsuit is not filed on time.
Insurance investigations and negotiations may continue for months, but the filing deadline continues running unless the case is formally filed in court.
Claims against government entities in Missouri can involve different deadlines and procedural requirements than ordinary personal injury lawsuits.
In many situations, a person pursuing a claim against the State of Missouri must provide written notice to the Office of Administration’s Risk Management Division within 90 days of the incident, although the exact requirements can vary depending on the government entity involved and the type of claim.
Missouri’s sovereign immunity laws also limit when government agencies, cities, counties, and public employees can be sued, with many claims allowed only in specific circumstances such as dangerous property conditions or motor vehicle negligence.
The underlying statute of limitations may still extend beyond the notice period, but missing an earlier notice requirement can jeopardize the case before a lawsuit is ever filed.
Because these rules differ between state agencies, municipalities, and federal entities, government-injury claims should be reviewed quickly and individually.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
Child Personal Injury Claims: How Are They Handled?
Mistakes to Avoid in a Personal Injury Claim
What Does Litigation Mean in a Personal Injury Case?
Personal Injury Claim vs Lawsuit: What’s the Difference?
Illinois Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
How Are Personal Injury Settlements Paid Out?
What is MDL?
Personal Injury Lawsuit Settlement Amounts
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) vs. Class Action Lawsuits: What’s the Difference?
FAQ: What Does a Personal Injury Lawyer Do?
Personal Injury Examples: Can You File a Claim?
What is a Contingency Fee?
Types of Personal Injury Evidence
FAQ: How Much Does a Personal Injury Lawyer Cost?
An Overview of the Personal Injury Lawsuit Timeline
What to Know About Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer
FAQ: How is Personal Injury Compensation Calculated?
Determining Personal Injury Liability
FAQ: How Long Does a Personal Injury Lawsuit Take?
How To File a Personal Injury Lawsuit
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.