The use of AFFF by firefighters, particularly in military settings, has been linked to an increased risk of developing Ulcerative Colitis.
AFFF contains PFAS, a group of toxic chemicals, which are believed to be a significant environmental risk factor for Ulcerative Colitis.
Lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of AFFF, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to adequately warn users.
No Longer Accepting Claims
AFFF Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting claims for the AFFF Lawsuit.
Intake Closed
Most Recent Updates
TorHoerman Law is NO LONGER accepting cases for the AFFF lawsuit.
Key Takeaways
The use of AFFF by firefighters, particularly in military settings, has been linked to an increased risk of developing Ulcerative Colitis.
AFFF contains PFAS, a group of toxic chemicals, which are believed to be a significant environmental risk factor for Ulcerative Colitis.
Lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of AFFF, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to adequately warn users.
Overview of AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit
On this page, we’ll discuss the AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit, health risks experienced by people exposed to AFFF firefighting foams, how AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawyers can help you, and much more.
Exposure to PFAS Chemicals in AFFF Firefighting Foam Linked to Ulcerative Colitis
Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) is a chemical that has been used to extinguish highly flammable liquid- or gas-fueled fires since the 1960s.
AFFF firefighting foam contains PFAS chemicals, also known as forever chemicals, which have been linked to numerous types of cancer, ulcerative colitis, and other serious health risks.
Ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, affects the colon and can lead to serious complications, including abdominal pain, persistent diarrhea, malnutrition, and an increased cancer risk.
AFFF firefighting foam, used extensively since the 1960s, contains PFAS chemicals linked to ulcerative colitis and other health issues.
Military personnel, especially in the Air Force and Navy, face heightened exposure due to regular AFFF use in fire suppression and training, increasing their risk of long-term health effects from these persistent chemicals.
AFFF Lawsuits are being filed across the country by individuals who have suffered ulcerative colitis and other health problems subsequent to AFFF exposure.
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, cancer, or any other related health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit instantly.
Our law firm is helping individuals file personal injury claims for AFFF exposure.
Firefighting foam products have been linked to numerous health risks, and firefighting foam manufacturers are facing targeted legal action from individuals exposed.
Don’t hesitate to reach out and ask us any questions you may have about your potential Firefighting Foam Lawsuit.
AFFF Firefighting Foam and Ulcerative Colitis Risk
AFFF, a foam concentrate designed to suppress and extinguish fires, contains per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) chemicals, which are highly persistent in the environment and can accumulate in the human body.
Studies have suggested a link between exposure to the toxic chemicals and various health problems, including ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
Characterized by inflammation and ulcers in the lining of the colon and rectum, ulcerative colitis can be a debilitating condition.
Ulcerative colitis symptoms can range from mild to severe, including:
Diarrhea
Blood in the stool
Abdominal pain and cramping
Loss of appetite
Weight loss
Ulcerative colitis significantly affects an individual’s quality of life and requires ongoing medical treatment.
The auto-immune condition can also lead to severe complications such as colon cancer and an increased risk of blood clots, infections, and kidney stones.
Studies linking exposure to PFAS chemicals and ulcerative colitis include:
A 2018 study published in the Journal of Environmental Research focused on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a specific type of PFAS, finding a strong association between long-term PFOA exposure and increased risk for ulcerative colitis.
A 2020 study published in the Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis linked increased PFAS levels with the late onset of ulcerative colitis. They suggested that PFAS exposure is an environmental risk factor for the disease.
The risk of developing ulcerative colitis increases with exposure to AFFF.
Apart from direct exposure, forever chemicals in the toxic firefighting foam can also enter drinking water, air, and soil.
AFFF can also be released into the environment through improper disposal, potentially leading to contamination of food and other products.
PFAS Chemicals in Firefighting Foam and Effects on Human Health
Chemical manufacturers and the U.S. Navy, who first approved AFFF firefighting foam for use, knew about its toxic effects for decades.
Urged by the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Defense finally submitted an official warningstating that the dangerous chemicals in AFFF present an increased risk for serious health problems and environmental contamination.
In a number of research studies, PFAS have been linked to an increased risk for cancer and other serious health problems.
With the number of chemicals used in firefighting foam, its health impacts are widespread.
The health of airport firefighters, military firefighters, chemical plant workers, and workers who transport and manufacture firefighting foam is especially at risk.
Studies on the links between AFFF exposure and health problems include the following:
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found a statistically significant association between PFOA exposure and an increased risk of kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and ulcerative colitis.
Another study published in the International Journal of Cancer found a positive association between PFOS exposure and breast cancer.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a health advisory for PFOA and PFOS, stating that long-term exposure to these chemicals above certain levels could be harmful to human health.
Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley studied the carcinogenic effects of PFAS on women firefighters and office workers, finding that firefighters who reported using firefighting foam in the past year had higher levels of several PFAS in their bodies compared to those who did not.
Cancers that have been associated with PFAS chemicals include:
Bladder cancer
Breast cancer
Colon cancer
Kidney cancer
Liver cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Prostate cancer
Rectal cancer
Testicular cancer
Thyroid cancer
Otherhealth problems associated with PFAS chemicals include:
Increased cholesterol levels
Changes in liver enzymes
Small decreases in infant birth weights
Decreased vaccine response in children
Increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women
The AFFF lawsuit is a legal action initiated by individuals suffering harm from AFFF exposure, including ulcerative colitis and other health conditions.
These firefighting foam cancer lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages that exposure to AFFF has caused.
For coordinated pretrial proceedings, almost 6,000 individual AFFF foam lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873).
The AFFF firefighting foam MDL is overseen by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in the U.S. District Court: District of South Carolina.
The AFFF MDL allows plaintiffs to share resources, coordinate evidence, and present a unified case against defendants.
Plaintiffs allege that the companies manufacturing AFFF knew about its toxicity yet marketed it without adequate warnings and failed to take action to reduce the risk of exposure.
Who Are the Defendants in the AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits?
The defendants in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits include manufacturers and distributors of AFFF products.
Defendants named in the AFFF MDL include:
3M
Chemours
DuPont
Tyco Fire Products
Several other manufacturers
Plaintiffs accuse these AFFF manufacturers of failing to adequately warn about the health risks associated with their products.
Who Can File an AFFF Lawsuit?
AFFF, or aqueous film forming foam, has been widely used since the 1960s to combat flammable liquid fires, especially in military, industrial, and firefighting applications.
Due to its effectiveness, AFFF became standard in training and emergency response settings, leading to prolonged exposure among those handling it regularly.
This extensive exposure has raised health concerns, as AFFF contains PFAS chemicals, known to pose serious health risks.
The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) includes not only those exposed directly to AFFF but also firefighters affected by PFAS-containing protective gear.
Those who may qualify for the AFFF MDL include:
Firefighters using AFFF or PFAS-containing gear who developed health issues
Military personnel, including Air Force and Navy members, who regularly used or trained with AFFF
Airport firefighters involved in fuel fire suppression activities
Industrial workers exposed to AFFF in petrochemical and manufacturing settings
Individuals exposed to PFAS-contaminated water near military bases or industrial facilities using AFFF
Municipal firefighters and first responders using AFFF in training or emergency response
What is the Average Firefighter Foam Lawsuit Settlement?
The AFFF litigation is still ongoing for AFFF lawsuits filed by individuals.
A successful AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit will present detailed information on exposure to firefighting foam, medical bills and records outlining treatment, and more to validate the claim.
These factors will determine an adequate settlement amount for a given AFFF lawsuit.
No settlements have been reached in the AFFF litigation as of yet, but lawyers estimate that AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts may fall between $40,000 to $300,000 or more depending on the strength of the case and other individual factors.
These settlement figures are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation in the AFFF Lawsuit, they are merely projections based on knowledge of prior mass tort cases and settlements for cancer diagnosis.
AFFF Lawsuit Settlement for Municipalities
3M, the largest manufacturer of AFFF foam in the list of defendants, agreed to pay at least $10.3 billion in an AFFF lawsuit settlement for municipal water contamination cases.
This settlement would help clean up PFAS contamination in public drinking water systems nationwide.
Is There a Firefighting Foam Class Action Lawsuit?
No, there isn’t an AFFF class action lawsuit.
Instead, AFFF personal injury cases are consolidated into the AFFF Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), which allows individual claims to be handled together in a centralized process.
Unlike a class action, where plaintiffs form a single collective case and share any settlement equally, MDL cases allow each plaintiff’s claim to remain separate, meaning compensation can be tailored to their specific circumstances and damages.
The AFFF MDL is centralized in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, where pretrial proceedings, including evidence gathering and common legal questions, are coordinated to streamline the process and improve consistency across cases.
This structure benefits plaintiffs by providing a unified process while still preserving their individual claims against the manufacturers of AFFF.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis or another health issue linked to AFFF exposure, taking legal action may be a viable option to seek compensation for your damages.
Qualified AFFF lawyers can review your case in detail to determine if you may be eligible for compensation.
They will also guide you through filing a lawsuit and help protect your rights throughout the legal process.
Experienced firefighting foam lawyers will help claimants gather evidence for their case and assess damages for personal injury claims.
Gathering Evidence for AFFF Lawsuits
To build a strong case, you must collect evidence related to your exposure to AFFF and the resulting health problems.
Evidence for AFFF Lawsuits may include:
Medical records
Diagnosis and treatment documents
Employment records
Documentation of AFFF use at your workplace
Laboratory results
Witness statements
Experienced firefighting foam attorneys can help you collect the necessary evidence and build a strong case for your lawsuit.
They can also answer any questions or concerns about filing an AFFF lawsuit and pursuing legal action.
Damages in Firefighting Foam Lawsuits
Understanding the full extent of your damages is essential when pursuing a lawsuit.
Damages refer to the total amount of losses, economic and non-economic, incurred as a result of AFFF exposure.
Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit may include:
Medical expenses
Ongoing treatment costs
Lost wages
Pain and suffering
Reduced quality of life
An experienced attorney can help you assess and quantify these damages accurately.
They will also help develop a solid legal strategy to maximize your chances of success and ensure you receive the full compensation you are entitled to.
Why Hiring Experienced Firefighting Foam Attorneys for Your Claim Is Important
Hiring an attorney experienced in AFFF firefighting foam litigation is crucial for navigating the complex legal landscape of these cases.
The legal process for AFFF lawsuits involves gathering extensive medical evidence, understanding chemical exposure risks, and applying specific federal and environmental regulations.
An experienced AFFF attorney can identify responsible parties and document your exposure to PFAS chemicals to build a compelling case for compensation.
Specialized AFFF lawyers bring invaluable expertise in handling the unique aspects of toxic exposure cases and possess the knowledge needed to tackle aggressive corporate defense strategies often used by large manufacturers.
They work to secure a fair settlement by assessing damages for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and any long-term health impacts.
With an experienced firefighting foam attorney, you benefit from seasoned advocacy that ensures your claim is thoroughly prepared for the MDL proceedings or any potential settlement negotiations.
AFFF lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers for the toxic effects of AFFF foam exposure.
Individuals exposed to firefighting foam are at an increased risk to develop cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, kidney disease, and more.
Our AFFF lawyers are known for holding large corporations and chemical manufacturers liable for the harm they’ve caused and securing financial compensation for people harmed at no fault of their own.
If you or a loved one have developed cancer or other adverse health outcomes after being regularly exposed to firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact our experienced firefighting foam lawyers today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit instantly.
Reach out to our attorneys with any questions you may have about AFFF firefighting foam cases, the potential health risks of AFFF exposure, and more.
AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits are consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The AFFF MDL centralizes all AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits into one single federal court to ensure the consistency of decision-making and the streamlining of the litigation.
MDL is different and distinct from class action lawsuits, as plaintiffs in MDLs retain individuality.
In an MDL settlement, compensation is distributed to plaintiffs according to the facts and circumstances in each individual case.
In a class action settlement, compensation is divided evenly among all claimants regardless of their individual circumstances.
Law firms often incorrectly use the terms “AFFF Class Action Lawsuit” or “AFFF Class Action MDL”, but these terms are incorrect.
Current AFFF Lawsuits and pending AFFF Lawsuits are consolidated into multidistrict litigation.
Multidistrict litigation, commonly referred to as MDL, is a special federal legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex litigations by consolidating cases and addressing all pretrial procedures in one court.
When a large number of people who have all been affected by the same thing file individual lawsuits, the federal court system allows for the consolidation of these cases into an MDL to make them easier to manage.
The original lawsuits do not have to be in the same state.
MDLs take cases from multiple federal districts (each state has at least one district), and puts them into one district court.
This single district court, and one judge, then address all the discovery and pretrial procedures that apply to every case – cutting the costs and amount of resources needed, and keeping court rulings consistent with similar cases.
No settlements have been reached in the AFFF litigation as of yet, but lawyers estimate that AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts may fall between $40,000 to $300,000 or more depending on the strength of the case and other individual factors.
These settlement figures are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation in the AFFF Lawsuit, they are merely projections based on knowledge of prior mass tort cases and settlements for cancer diagnosis.
Those at highest risk of developing ulcerative colitis from PFAS exposure include individuals with direct, repeated contact with PFAS-containing firefighting foam, especially firefighters, airport personnel, and military service members.
Residents living near contaminated water sources are also at risk due to long-term environmental exposure to these harmful substances.
The immune response triggered by toxic PFAS chemicals may lead to immune system dysfunction, which is a key factor in the development of autoimmune diseases like ulcerative colitis.
The risk is heightened by prolonged or high-level exposure, which can lead to a cumulative toxic effect over time.
These findings raise alarms about the environmental health impact of PFAS on vulnerable populations.
Yes, individuals diagnosed with ulcerative colitis after PFAS exposure may be eligible to pursue legal action through the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits.
While much attention has focused on kidney and testicular cancers and kidney cancer claims, ulcerative colitis is increasingly being recognized as part of the broader spectrum of serious health issues linked to PFAS exposure.
Legal claims emphasize the role of toxic PFAS chemicals in disrupting the immune system and causing chronic gut inflammation, especially in cases involving long-term or occupational exposure.
As scientific evidence continues to grow, plaintiffs with autoimmune-related conditions like ulcerative colitis are being considered in both public health reviews and the ongoing AFFF litigation.
These claims may become a critical component of any future global settlement involving PFAS-related illnesses.
PFAS exposure is associated with a wide range of health consequences, including kidney or testicular cancer, liver and thyroid cancer, and metabolic and immune system disorders.
In addition to causing gut inflammation, severe health risks linked to PFAS exposure extend across multiple organ systems.
People exposed through contaminated water or occupational exposure may face both immediate and long-term health impacts.
The full extent of various health risks is still being studied, but mounting scientific evidence confirms a troubling relationship between PFAS exposure and chronic illness.
Because ulcerative colitis involves chronic inflammation of the colon, PFAS-related immune disruption is a likely contributor to the disease’s onset and progression.
Recent research has shown that PFAS-containing firefighting foam may increase the risk of developing ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon.
Studies suggest that toxic PFAS chemicals can trigger immune system dysfunction, contributing to the onset or worsening of autoimmune diseases like ulcerative colitis.
This connection is especially concerning for individuals with occupational exposure to firefighting foam, such as firefighters and military personnel.
The persistent nature of these harmful substances in the body and environment raises serious concerns about public health.
As scientific evidence continues to build, ulcerative colitis is increasingly being recognized among the serious health issues associated with AFFF exposure.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
Legally Reviewed
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
Fact-Checked
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.