Active LitigationMDL 3140
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Active Litigation·MDL 3140
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
This page provides an overview of the Depo-Provera litigation, including who may qualify, the scientific evidence connecting repeated medroxyprogesterone acetate injections to meningioma, the status of the federal lawsuits, and the potential settlement process.
It is intended for individuals who received Depo-Provera or a covered generic injection and were later diagnosed with an intracranial or spinal meningioma, as well as family members seeking information on their behalf.
Depo-Provera lawsuits allege that Pfizer and related companies failed to warn patients and prescribing clinicians about an increased risk of meningioma associated with repeated use of the contraceptive injection.
In June 2026, plaintiffs’ leadership and certain defendants reached a global agreement that may allow eligible plaintiffs in the federal multidistrict litigation to resolve their claims.
The eligibility requirements and payment terms have not been publicly disclosed, and the agreement will not resolve every pending case.
TorHoerman Law continues to review claims from individuals who received Depo-Provera or a covered generic injection and were later diagnosed with an intracranial or spinal meningioma.
Eligibility depends on the claimant’s injection history, diagnosis, medical records, filing deadline, and the requirements of the resolution program.

The Depo-Provera lawsuit alleges that Pfizer and related companies failed to warn patients and prescribing doctors about the risk of meningioma associated with repeated use of the birth control shot.
Depo-Provera is a contraceptive injection containing injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate, a synthetic progestin administered approximately once every three months.
The current Depo Provera litigation involves individuals who received repeated injections and were later diagnosed with a meningioma affecting the brain or spinal cord.
Although meningiomas are often classified as noncancerous, their location can cause headaches, vision loss, seizures, cognitive problems, mobility limitations, and other neurological injuries.
Some patients require surgical removal, radiation treatment, or continued imaging to monitor a tumor that cannot be safely removed.
Plaintiffs allege that Pfizer knew or should have known about evidence connecting prolonged exposure to high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate with meningioma development.
They claim the company failed to provide adequate warnings that would have allowed patients and doctors to consider other forms of birth control.
Through these lawsuits, plaintiffs seek compensation for their injuries and aim to hold Pfizer accountable for the alleged failure to disclose the risk.
In February 2025, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred federal Depo-Provera cases to the Northern District of Florida for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
The consolidation allows the parties to address shared scientific evidence, company records, expert testimony, and legal issues while preserving each plaintiff’s individual lawsuit.
In June 2026, the parties reached an agreement in principle establishing a resolution program for certain eligible plaintiffs in the federal litigation.
The Depo Provera settlement does not automatically resolve every pending or future claim, and its eligibility requirements and payment terms have not been publicly disclosed.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for the Depo-Provera lawsuit.

Depo Provera claims allege that Pfizer failed to warn patients and doctors that repeated use of the injectable birth control medication may increase the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors.
Women filing lawsuits contend that the birth control shot led to a meningioma diagnosis and that the Depo Provera label did not contain an adequate meningioma warning during the years they used the drug.
Meningiomas form in the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
These tumors account for approximately 40% of all reported brain tumors. Most are classified as noncancerous, but around 10% to 15% of meningiomas can be cancerous.
Even a noncancerous brain or spinal tumor may require surgical removal, radiation, or long-term monitoring.

Evidence cited in the litigation includes the following:
The lawsuits do not establish that Depo Provera caused every tumor diagnosed after use of the drug.
Each claim requires an individual review of the patient’s injection history, duration of use, medical records, diagnosis, treatment, and other possible risk factors.
Depo-Provera has FDA approval as a contraceptive injection, but approval does not prevent patients from filing lawsuits alleging that Pfizer failed to disclose a serious risk.
The updated Depo Provera label now addresses meningioma, while plaintiffs argue that patients and prescribing doctors should have received this warning earlier.
In June 2026, plaintiffs’ leadership reached a global agreement with Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia LLC, and Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC to resolve certain lawsuits pending in the federal Depo-Provera MDL.
Under the agreement, plaintiffs who satisfy criteria established by the parties will have an opportunity to settle their cases.
The court’s order does not identify those eligibility requirements or disclose how compensation will be calculated.
The agreement is an important development because it creates a potential resolution process before the litigation reaches bellwether trials.

However, the Depo shot settlement will not resolve every lawsuit. The court expressly stated that only eligible plaintiffs may participate and that other cases will remain pending.
The settlement news also caused the court to postpone its ruling on Pfizer’s federal preemption motion.
Proceedings addressing whether expert evidence can establish that Depo-Provera causes meningiomas are continuing because unresolved cases will still depend on those scientific and legal decisions.
Each Depo shot claim must be evaluated individually based on the product used, number and duration of injections, meningioma diagnosis, treatment history, medical documentation, and applicable filing deadline.
As with other pharmaceutical injury claims, the existence of a settlement program does not guarantee that every claimant will qualify or receive the same amount of compensation.
Estimated Depo-Provera settlement amounts may range from approximately $150,000 to more than $1 million for qualifying claims.
Average settlements in comparable meningioma cases have exceeded $800,000, although that figure does not establish what an individual Depo-Provera claimant will receive.

The potential value of a claim may depend on factors such as:
The terms of the current Depo-Provera settlement program have not been publicly disclosed.
Settlement amounts may therefore differ substantially based on the claimant’s diagnosis, treatment history, damages, and eligibility under the final resolution criteria.
These estimates are based on reported outcomes in comparable meningioma and pharmaceutical injury cases, not confirmed payments from the Depo-Provera settlement program.
No settlement amount is guaranteed, and some claims may resolve for less than the estimated range or may not qualify for compensation.
An attorney cannot accurately determine the value of a claim until the claimant’s medical records, injection history, damages, and applicable settlement requirements have been reviewed.
Depo-Provera has been the subject of lawsuits dating back to the early 2000s.
The first wave of claims centered around the drug’s link to bone mineral density loss.
Plaintiffs alleged that Pfizer failed to warn about the risk of osteoporosis.
In 2021, Pfizer settled a Canadian class action case related to the bone density loss side effects and related conditions for over $2 million.
The FDA had issued a Black Box Warning in 2004 about this risk, and subsequent lawsuits have claimed that Pfizer failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and healthcare providers.
Now, with new research linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors, a second wave of lawsuits is being investigated.
Yes, authorized generic versions of Depo-Provera, known as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), are included in the current lawsuits alleging a link between the injectable contraceptive and brain tumors.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits claim that both the brand-name and generic forms of the medication have led to a heightened risk of serious health issues, including meningioma brain tumors.
Our attorneys have decades of experience representing people who have been harmed by pharmaceutical drugs, pursuing compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and the pain and suffering caused by these injuries.
At TorHoerman Law, we understand the challenges present in cases involving harmful medications like Depo-Provera, and we are committed to guiding clients through every step of the legal process.
Our team will work to gather essential evidence, consult medical experts, and build a strong case that reflects the full scope of your injuries.
We aim to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable for their actions, seeking justice for those affected by inadequate warnings and potentially dangerous drugs.
If you or a loved one have developed health complications from Depo-Provera, our attorneys are here to provide knowledgeable, compassionate, and diligent representation.

Meet Our Depo-Provera Attorneys:
At TorHoerman Law, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing upfront and only owe legal fees if we successfully recover compensation for your case.
We believe financial barriers should never prevent individuals from accessing top-tier legal representation, especially when fighting for justice after serious injuries.

Our contingency model allows you to focus on your recovery while we handle the legal complexities of your Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
There are no hidden costs or unexpected fees—our firm is committed to transparency and fairness.
If you or a loved one has been impacted by Depo-Provera, contact us today for a free case evaluation.
You may qualify for a Depo Provera meningioma lawsuit if you received at least two injections and were later diagnosed with an intracranial meningioma.
Eligibility may depend on how long you were taking Depo Provera, the number of injections you received, and whether medical records confirm your diagnosis and treatment.
Claims may involve Depo-Provera CI, Depo SubQ, or certain authorized generic versions containing medroxyprogesterone acetate.
A qualifying claim may also require evidence showing that the tumor developed after Depo-Provera use and caused medical expenses, lost income, neurological symptoms, or other damages.

These product liability lawsuits are generally filed against the drug manufacturers and distributors rather than as medical malpractice claims against prescribing doctors.
An attorney can review your injection history, diagnosis date, medical records, product information, and applicable filing deadline to determine whether you may qualify.
Building a strong case for a Depo-Provera Lawsuit requires thorough documentation and credible evidence.
Plaintiffs need to demonstrate both their use of the contraceptive and the health issues they have experienced as a result.
Gathering this evidence can be difficult, but it’s essential to establish a clear connection between Depo-Provera use and the development of meningiomas.
Your attorneys will help you through this process.

Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit may include:
Carefully compiling this evidence can strengthen your claim and help your attorney build a compelling case for compensation.
Damages in a lawsuit refer to the monetary compensation sought by plaintiffs to address the harm caused by a defendant’s actions or negligence.
These damages can cover a wide range of losses, including medical expenses, lost income, and emotional distress.
Depo-Provera cases seek compensation for the significant physical, emotional, and financial toll experienced by women diagnosed with brain tumors linked to the contraceptive.

Below are the types of damages plaintiffs may pursue in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit:
These damages aim to provide financial relief and hold the responsible parties accountable for the harm caused.
Working with an experienced attorney can help plaintiffs accurately document their losses and pursue maximum compensation.
Our attorneys examine injection records, diagnostic imaging, surgical reports, pathology findings, treatment history, and other evidence needed to determine whether a claim may qualify.
The federal litigation has advanced into a potential settlement process for certain eligible plaintiffs, but the agreement will not resolve every pending case.

The lawsuits seek to hold Pfizer and other responsible companies accountable for allegedly failing to warn patients and prescribing clinicians about the risk of meningioma associated with repeated Depo-Provera use.
Depo-Provera users who were later diagnosed with a brain tumor (particularly meningioma) may qualify to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer, Pfizer.
Women who used the injectable birth control for a prolonged period and experienced serious neurological symptoms are at the center of growing legal claims.
Plaintiffs who have filed Depo Provera lawsuits allege that the drug’s long-term use significantly increased their risk of developing intracranial tumors and that Pfizer failed to properly warn about this potential risk.
To sue Depo Provera manufacturer Pfizer, individuals typically need strong medical documentation and a clear timeline of use.
Eligibility will vary depending on state-specific filing deadlines and the strength of the available evidence. A qualified attorney can help determine whether your personal history supports legal action.
Potential criteria for a Depo-Provera brain tumor claim may include:
Yes.
In December 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a significant update to the FDA-approved Depo-Provera prescribing information to include a warning about the risk of meningiomas, a type of brain tumor, for patients receiving medroxyprogesterone acetate injections.
The updated language now advises clinicians and patients that cases of meningiomas have been reported with repeated use of the injectable birth control shot, including Depo-Provera CI and similar formulations, and recommends monitoring for signs and symptoms of a brain tumor.
This label change follows emerging scientific evidence and comes amid widespread litigation alleging that manufacturers failed to warn users of this risk for many years.
You may qualify for a Depo-Provera lawsuit if you received at least two Depo-Provera injections and were later diagnosed with an intracranial or spinal meningioma.
Attorneys will also review the specific product used, injection dates, medical records, treatment history, diagnosis date, and applicable filing deadline.
Meeting the preliminary criteria does not guarantee that a claim will be accepted or qualify for the settlement program.
Most states allow approximately two to three years to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit after a meningioma diagnosis.
The exact deadline depends on the applicable state law and when you knew or reasonably should have known that the tumor may be connected to Depo-Provera use.
Some states apply a discovery rule that can change when the filing period begins. Because missing the statute of limitations may prevent your claim from moving forward, you should have your case reviewed as soon as possible.
A Depo-Provera lawsuit requires evidence confirming both your use of the contraceptive injection and your meningioma diagnosis.
Relevant records may include:
An attorney can help obtain missing records and determine whether the available evidence supports a claim.
A benign meningioma may still support a Depo-Provera lawsuit because the current claims are not limited to cancerous tumors.
Even a slow-growing, nonmalignant meningioma can press on the brain, spinal cord, nerves, or blood vessels and may require surgery, radiation, or continued monitoring.
Eligibility depends on the claimant’s Depo-Provera injection history, diagnosis, treatment, medical records, and applicable filing deadline.
A qualifying claimant may seek compensation for the financial, physical, and personal effects of a meningioma diagnosis.
Potential damages may include:
The damages available depend on the claimant’s diagnosis, treatment, long-term prognosis, documented losses, and applicable state law.
Estimated Depo-Provera settlement amounts may range from approximately $150,000 to more than $1 million, while average settlements in comparable meningioma cases have exceeded $800,000.
The value of an individual claim may depend on whether the tumor required surgery or radiation, the severity of neurological injuries, medical expenses, lost income, and the strength of the claimant’s injection and medical records.
These estimates are not guaranteed payments, and the terms of the current Depo-Provera settlement program have not been publicly disclosed.
The first publicly reported Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit was filed by Kristina Schmidt on October 1, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Schmidt alleged that prolonged use of Depo Provera caused her to develop an intracranial meningioma that required brain surgery.
Her complaint named Pfizer and several related manufacturers and distributors, claiming they failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the meningioma risk.
Additional lawsuits followed, and the federal cases were consolidated into multidistrict litigation in February 2025.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Depo-Provera Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.