Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

Benicar Lawsuit

4.9
Google
677 reviews

Benicar is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension).

It is sometimes given together with other blood pressure medications.

Benicar is one of eight marketed ARB drugs, and the only one linked to sprue-like enteropathy.

300 million benicar settlement reached

Benicar was first approved for market in 2002.

It is manufactured by Daiichi Sankyo.

The symptoms of Benicar enteropathy look very similar to those of Celiac Disease.

But, unlike Celiac Disease, a gluten-free lifestyle will not improve the symptoms.

The only way to improve Benicar enteropathy is by discontinuing the medication.

If you have experienced any of the following side effects, and you have been prescribed Benicar for hypertension, contact your health care professional right away.

Benicar Lawsuit

On July 4, 2013, the FDA issued a warning that Benicar causes sprue-like enteropathy.

According to the FDA warning, symptoms of sprue-like enteropathy include severe, chronic diarrhea with substantial weight loss.

The FDA approved changes to the labels of Benicar to include this concern.

The FDA previously sent Benicar manufacturer, Daiichi Sankyo, a warning regarding the manufacturer’s false advertising of Benicar.

In 2010, the FDA released a warning that Benicar may increase the risk of death in diabetic patients.

Prior to the FDA warning, in 2012 the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota studied 22 patients hospitalized and presenting symptoms similar to celiac disease – unexplained chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and enteropathy.

But, unlike celiac disease, these patients were unable to control these symptoms with a gluten-free lifestyle and antibody blood tests did not support a diagnosis of celiac disease.

The Mayo Clinic discovered that each of the patients was prescribed Benicar for their hypertension.

Suspecting this was more than a coincidence, the Mayo clinic asked the severely injured patients to discontinue their use of Benicar.

After discontinuing Benicar, the patients confirmed that chronic diarrhea, vomiting, weight loss, and other intestinal inflammation symptoms improved.

Furthermore, after discontinuing Benicar, the patients gained an average of 27 pounds.

Following this link, an additional 40 patients have been determined to have Benicar-associated sprue-like enteropathy.

These numbers are likely to increase given the significant delay between the onset of severe sprue-like enteropathy and the start of the medication.

Multiple studies released in 2014 support a link between Benicar and sprue-like enteropathy.

If you have questions, contact TorHoerman Law.

Published by:
Share
Picture of Tor Hoerman
Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.

TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.

TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.

Lawsuit Facts
Have you or a loved one been injured?

A serious injury can change your life.

Speak with an experienced personal injury lawyer about your rights, your case, and the legal options available to you.
Google
677 reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Recovered damages
$4 Billion+

Table of Contents

Guides & Resources
About TorHoerman Law

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.

Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.

Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

$495 Million
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

$20 Million
Toxic Tort Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

$103.8 Million
COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

$4 Million
Traumatic Brain Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

$2.8 Million
Defective Heart Device

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.