
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
FMCSA regulations establish the federal safety standards that govern much of the trucking industry in the United States.
When a truck driver or motor carrier violates those rules and the violation contributes to a collision, the violation may become important evidence in a truck accident claim.
FMCSA regulations address driver qualifications, hours of service, vehicle maintenance, cargo securement, drug testing, and other safety requirements.
Understanding how these rules apply can help injured people identify potentially liable parties and preserve evidence before it is lost.
A truck accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law can review your truck accident lawsuit claim against the regulations that underpin the trucking industry.

FMCA regulations are federal safety rules that govern many commercial truck and bus operators in the United States.
When a truck driver, motor carrier, cargo loader, maintenance contractor, or other trucking-related party violates these commercial motor carrier regulations and the violation contributes to a crash, the violation can become important evidence in a truck accident claim.
The records that prove trucking compliance violations are usually controlled by the trucking company and may be overwritten or lost quickly, making early evidence preservation critical.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) writes and enforces federal commercial vehicle regulations for many truck drivers, motor carriers, and bus operators.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) cover hours of service, driver qualifications, drug and alcohol testing, maintenance, cargo securement, electronic logging devices, and motor carrier recordkeeping.
A violation of federal truck safety laws can strengthen a truck accident case when the violation helped cause the collision or injuries.
FMCSA evidence may support negligence, direct carrier liability, punitive damages, and claims against cargo loaders, maintenance companies, brokers, or manufacturers.
If you or a loved one was injured in a collision involving a commercial truck, understanding the applicable FMCSA regulations can make a significant difference in building a strong case.
Evidence of federal safety violations may help establish liability and strengthen your ability to pursue compensation for severe injuries, medical expenses, lost income, and other damages.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation to discuss your accident, preserve critical evidence, and learn about your legal options.
FMCSA regulations are federal regulations administered by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, an agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The agency oversees the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, or FMCSRs, which establish minimum safety requirements for covered commercial vehicles, motor carriers, drivers, maintenance programs, cargo securement, operating records, drug and alcohol testing, and other aspects of commercial transportation.
The FMCSRs also limit driving and working hours to reduce driver fatigue and require covered carriers to maintain specified levels of financial responsibility.
The FMCSRs are primarily codified in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 350 through 399.
They are commonly referred to as FMCSA rules, federal trucking regulations, commercial vehicle safety regulations, or federal motor carrier regulations.
The specific rules that apply depend on the carrier, vehicle, cargo, route, passenger capacity, and type of operation.
FMCSA regulations generally apply to commercial motor vehicles used in interstate commerce when the vehicle or combination has an actual weight, gross vehicle weight rating, gross combination weight rating, or gross combination weight of at least 10,001 pounds.

Covered vehicles may also include vehicles used to transport regulated numbers of passengers or hazardous materials requiring placards, regardless of weight.
State law may adopt comparable federal standards for commercial vehicles operating entirely within one state.
Federal financial-responsibility requirements vary by operation and cargo.
For example, many for-hire interstate property carriers operating vehicles weighing at least 10,001 pounds must maintain at least $750,000 in public-liability coverage, while certain hazardous-material carriers must carry higher limits.
A fully loaded tractor-trailer may weigh approximately 80,000 pounds under standard federal Interstate limits, and its size and weight can contribute to severe injuries and substantial economic losses when a crash occurs.
A truck accident claim is different from a typical car accident claim because the trucking industry operates under written federal and state safety standards.
Those standards define how carriers must screen drivers, monitor driving time, maintain equipment, test for drug and alcohol use, and secure freight.
A crash may appear to involve only driver error.
Trucking records may show a deeper safety failure: an exhausted driver, an unqualified driver, ignored brake problems, missing post-accident testing, altered logs, or cargo loaded in violation of federal securement rules.
A documented violation can help prove breach of duty and can also expand liability beyond the driver.

Depending on the facts, the motor carrier, shipper, broker, warehouse, cargo loader, repair facility, maintenance contractor, or defective-part manufacturer may share responsibility.
That broader liability analysis can materially affect compensation for medical bills, future care, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, property damage, and, where state law permits, punitive damages. See our full breakdown of what you can recover in a truck accident claim.
For more on the litigation process, see the Truck Accident Lawsuit Guide.
FMCSA terminology appears throughout trucking records, safety databases, inspection reports, and accident investigations.
The terms can apply to commercial truck drivers operating a big rig across state lines, as well as certain tow trucks and other vehicles that meet federal or state commercial-vehicle requirements.

Understanding the following definitions can make it easier to identify the carrier, driver, safety history, and records that may matter after a truck accident:
Commercial truck accidents can present more complicated legal issues than ordinary car crashes because large vehicles are governed by detailed federal safety requirements.
These cases may involve multiple parties, including the driver, motor carrier, cargo loader, maintenance contractor, or another company involved in the shipment.
FMCSA regulations address several of the most common causes of serious truck crashes, including driver fatigue, inadequate maintenance, unqualified drivers, impaired driving, and improperly secured cargo.
A violation can help explain how the collision occurred and whether a company failed to follow mandatory safety practices.
The following rules are among the most important when investigating liability in a truck accident claim.

The hours-of-service rules in 49 C.F.R. Part 395 limit how long many commercial drivers may drive and remain on duty before resting.
Hours-of-service violations are among the most common FMCSA violations investigated after serious truck accidents because fatigue can impair reaction time, judgment, braking distance, and lane control.
When a driver exceeds the legal limits, attorneys often compare electronic logging device data, dispatch communications, GPS records, and other evidence to determine whether fatigue contributed to the crash.
These federal trucking safety rules are designed to reduce fatigue-related crashes.
Example: A driver exceeds the 11-hour limit, continues across I-70 to meet a delivery deadline, drifts from the lane, and rear-ends stopped traffic.
ELD records, fuel receipts, GPS data, and dispatch messages may prove fatigue and carrier pressure.
Exceptions may apply, including short-haul rules, sleeper-berth provisions, adverse driving conditions extensions, and certain emergency or agricultural exceptions.
The carrier and driver must be able to document that the exception actually applied based on the route, timing, duty status, and supporting records.
A motor carrier must ensure that a commercial driver is legally, medically, and operationally qualified.
The Driver Qualification File may include the CDL, endorsements, medical examiner’s certificate, employment application, prior-employment inquiries, motor vehicle record checks, annual reviews, and other required documents.
Gaps can support negligent hiring, retention, supervision, or entrustment claims.
Examples include hiring a driver with a suspended CDL, ignoring prior crashes, failing to verify prior safety problems, or allowing a driver with an expired medical certificate to operate.
These requirements help ensure that commercial drivers have the training, licensing, medical fitness, and driving history necessary to operate large commercial vehicles safely.
FMCSA drug and alcohol rules require testing in several circumstances, including pre-employment, random, reasonable-suspicion, post-accident, return-to-duty, and follow-up testing.
The Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse helps prevent drivers from hiding prior violations by changing employers.
A positive test may support impairment evidence.
A missing required test may show carrier noncompliance.
Post-accident testing requirements depend on the circumstances of the crash, including whether it involved a fatality or whether the commercial driver received a citation in connection with an injury or disabling-vehicle crash.
Drug and alcohol testing records can help determine whether impairment contributed to a crash and whether the motor carrier complied with its federal safety obligations.
Motor carriers must systematically inspect, repair, and maintain commercial motor vehicles.
Evidence may include periodic inspection reports, Driver Vehicle Inspection Reports, roadside inspection reports, brake and tire records, steering and coupling records, lighting records, work orders, invoices, and out-of-service repair documentation.
Maintenance violations are often central to cases involving brake failures, tire blowouts, underride crashes, trailer separations, steering defects, lighting defects, rollover accidents, and jackknife crashes.
Learn more in our overview of types of truck accidents.
If a carrier knew about a defect and kept the truck in service, direct corporate negligence and punitive damages may be at issue.
Poor maintenance is one of the most common causes of preventable commercial truck accidents. Inspection and repair records can show whether a mechanical failure resulted from ordinary wear, improper repairs, or a carrier’s failure to comply with federal safety regulations.
FMCSA cargo securement rules in Part 393 govern how cargo must be loaded, distributed, blocked, braced, and tied down.
Improper securement can cause rollovers, jackknife crashes, lost-load collisions, longer stopping distance, or sudden loss of control.
Cargo cases often involve flatbed freight, steel coils, construction materials, logs, heavy equipment, hazardous materials, and unevenly distributed loads.
The number, strength, condition, and placement of tie-downs may matter, as can whether the driver inspected the load after starting the trip and at required intervals.
Depending on the facts, liability may extend beyond the motor carrier to a shipper, warehouse, loading contractor, maintenance provider, or, in some cases, a freight broker or third-party logistics company.
Key evidence includes bills of lading, load diagrams, weight tickets, seal records, dock records, photographs, contracts, and driver communications.
Cargo securement violations often become important evidence when freight shifts during transport, falls from a trailer, or affects the truck’s stability before a collision.
Electronic Logging Devices often provide important evidence about whether a commercial driver complied with federal hours-of-service rules before a crash.
Most drivers subject to those rules must use an ELD to record driving time, duty status, and other information connected to vehicle operation.
Attorneys may evaluate several factors within the data, including driving hours, duty-status changes, location information, vehicle movement, log edits, annotations, and unassigned driving time.
Potential compliance issues include improper use of personal-conveyance or yard-move status, unexplained driving activity, edits made after the crash, pressure from dispatch, device malfunctions, or possible tampering.
ELD records should be preserved quickly because some information may be overwritten, retained for only a limited period, or become more difficult to obtain after control of the records changes.
Comparing ELD data with GPS records, fuel receipts, toll records, dispatch messages, and other evidence can help determine whether fatigue or falsified logs contributed to the collision.
Roadside inspection reports can reveal safety violations that existed before a collision and may show whether a motor carrier had an ongoing pattern of noncompliance.
Commercial trucks and drivers may be inspected during roadside stops, post-crash investigations, terminal reviews, and other enforcement operations.
A serious violation can result in an out-of-service order, which prevents the driver or vehicle from continuing to operate until the identified safety problem is corrected.
The inspection levels most likely to become relevant in a truck accident investigation include:
Inspection history may identify repeated brake defects, hours-of-service violations, unsafe driving, or driver-fitness problems.
Repeated violations can support claims that the carrier failed to maintain its vehicles, supervise its drivers, or correct known safety risks.
Attorneys may compare inspection reports with maintenance records, driver files, and crash evidence to determine whether prior noncompliance contributed to the collision.
FMCSA violations can provide important evidence when determining how a commercial truck accident happened and who may be legally responsible.
A regulatory violation does not automatically establish liability, but it may help prove liability when the evidence shows that the violation contributed to the collision and resulting serious injuries.
Attorneys conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether the truck driver, motor carrier, or another party failed to comply with federal safety regulations.
The investigation often combines trucking records with crash-scene evidence, eyewitness accounts, electronic data, and expert analysis to reconstruct what occurred.
Medical treatment records, diagnostic imaging, and physician opinions may also help connect the collision to the injuries claimed in the lawsuit.
When a crash results in catastrophic injuries or death, FMCSA violations may become an important part of a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit brought by an injured person or surviving family member.

Evidence commonly used to evaluate FMCSA violations includes:
The strength of a truck accident claim depends on whether the available evidence connects the regulatory violation to the collision and resulting damages.
A violation that had no effect on the crash may have little legal significance, while one that directly contributed to the accident can substantially strengthen a claim.
An experienced truck accident attorney can identify the relevant FMCSA records, preserve critical evidence, and determine which companies or individuals may share responsibility.
A thorough investigation often reveals evidence that is unavailable immediately after the collision and helps build the strongest possible case for compensation.
Truck accident claims require more than a review of the police report because liability may depend on driver conduct, carrier practices, vehicle maintenance, cargo handling, road conditions, and compliance with federal safety regulations.
TorHoerman Law investigates whether a trucking company assigns employees unrealistic schedules, overlooks known safety problems, or fails to preserve records that explain how the collision occurred.
Our attorneys identify potentially responsible parties, document the full extent of the client’s losses, and negotiate for a fair settlement that accounts for medical expenses, lost income, future care, pain, and other available damages.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation with an experienced truck accident attorney.
There is no cost to discuss your case, and qualifying claims are handled on a contingency-fee basis, meaning attorney’s fees are owed only if compensation is recovered.
FMCSA violations can strengthen a truck accident lawsuit when they help establish how the crash occurred and who may be legally responsible.
Although a violation does not automatically determine the outcome in court, it may support claims that a truck driver, trucking company, maintenance provider, cargo loader, or even independent contractors failed to meet federal safety requirements.
Attorneys use FMCSA records together with other evidence to show whether a safety violation contributed to the collision and the resulting injuries.
FMCSA violations may help:
No.
An FMCSA violation can be strong evidence of negligence, and in some states it can support negligence per se, but the violation must still be connected to the crash and injuries.
A fatigue, maintenance, qualification, impairment, or cargo violation that contributed to the crash can be central to liability.
A trucking company’s compliance history can often be evaluated by reviewing public FMCSA records, police reports, roadside inspection reports, and other evidence gathered after the crash.
An attorney may also obtain records that are not publicly available, including Driver Qualification Files, Electronic Logging Device (ELD) data, maintenance records, dispatch communications, and drug and alcohol testing records through the legal discovery process.
A thorough investigation can determine whether federal safety violations contributed to the collision and whether those violations support a claim for compensation.
Evidence commonly reviewed includes:
Trucking companies routinely overwrite or discard certain electronic records as part of their normal record-retention policies, making it important to preserve evidence as soon as possible after a crash.
Once a company has a legal duty to preserve evidence because litigation is reasonably anticipated, destroying relevant records may result in court sanctions or other legal consequences.
An experienced truck accident attorney can send a preservation letter requesting that Electronic Logging Device (ELD) data, dash-cam footage, GPS records, dispatch communications, and other electronic evidence be retained.
Electronic records that may need to be preserved include:
Possibly.
Federal rules primarily govern interstate commerce, but many states apply similar or identical safety standards to intrastate carriers.
The answer depends on the vehicle, cargo, carrier, route, operating authority, and state law.
Liability may extend to the motor carrier, driver employer, owner-operator, broker, shipper, cargo loader, warehouse, maintenance contractor, repair shop, or defective-part manufacturer.
The responsible parties depend on who controlled the driver, vehicle, shipment, cargo, maintenance, and safety decisions.
Use caution before giving a recorded statement or signing any document.
The insurer may contact you before injuries are fully known and before trucking records have been preserved.
Legal review before responding can help protect evidence, avoid broad authorizations, and prevent premature settlement.
Possibly.
Missouri uses pure comparative fault.
Illinois and Georgia use modified comparative-fault rules.
FMCSA evidence can reduce or shift alleged fault by showing that the trucking side violated safety rules that contributed to the crash.
The compensation available in a truck accident case depends on the severity of the injuries, the available evidence, and the losses caused by the collision.
Many claims seek both economic damages, which compensate for financial losses, and non-economic damages, which compensate for personal harm that is more difficult to measure.
In cases involving especially reckless conduct, punitive damages may also be available under certain state laws.
An experienced truck accident attorney can evaluate the facts of the case and calculate the full value of current and future damages.
Compensation may include:
Truck accident lawsuits are not always limited to the truck driver or motor carrier.
If a defective brake system, tire, steering component, coupling device, or another truck part contributed to the collision, the truck manufacturer or another company in the supply chain may also be held liable.
Product liability claims often proceed alongside negligence claims involving maintenance, inspection, or FMCSA compliance.
An attorney can investigate whether the crash resulted from a manufacturing defect, poor maintenance, or both.
Possible defendants may include:
Yes, although claims against government agencies follow different legal rules than claims against private trucking companies.
Government agency drivers and public entities may still be sued despite sovereign immunity in situations where federal or state law allows those claims.
Special notice requirements, shorter filing deadlines, and procedural rules often apply.
An attorney can determine which laws govern your claim and preserve your right to recover compensation.
Federal law requires many interstate motor carriers to maintain minimum levels of financial responsibility based on the type of cargo they transport.
While many for-hire carriers transporting non-hazardous freight must carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage, hazardous materials carriers may be required to carry up to $5 million.
Motor carriers must also file evidence of financial responsibility under 49 C.F.R. Part 387 before operating. Available insurance coverage depends on the carrier, cargo, and circumstances of the crash.
Insurance requirements may vary based on:
Most commercial drivers must obtain a valid Department of Transportation medical examiner’s certificate to demonstrate they are physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle.
In most cases, drivers must undergo a DOT medical examination every 24 months, although some medical conditions require more frequent certification.
Allowing a driver to operate without a valid medical certificate may violate FMCSA regulations and become relevant in a truck accident lawsuit.
Yes. Many motor carriers must register with the FMCSA before operating in interstate commerce, and for-hire carriers generally must obtain operating authority when required by federal law.
Registration commonly includes filing Form MCSA-1, obtaining a USDOT Number, completing required administrative filings before the number becomes active, and updating registration information every 24 months.
Commercial vehicles must also display the carrier’s USDOT Number as required by FMCSA regulations.
Registration requirements commonly include:
A carrier’s compliance history may reveal repeated safety violations involving driver qualifications, hours-of-service, vehicle maintenance, or other federal regulations.
Poor compliance can trigger FMCSA audits, increase insurance premiums, and indicate broader safety management problems within the company.
Although prior violations do not automatically establish liability, they may help attorneys identify evidence and investigate whether similar failures contributed to the crash.

Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
Truck Driver Fatigue Accidents and Hours-of-Service Violations
Proving Truck Driver Negligence: Step-By-Step Guide
Truck Tire Blowout Accidents: Who is Liable?
Truck Accident Investigation: Steps, Processes, and How a Lawyer Helps
Average Truck Accident Settlements
Truck Accident Compensation Guide
Truck Accident Liability and Fault: Complete Guide
Who Can File a Truck Accident Claim?
The Legal Process for a Semi-Truck Accident Lawsuit
Can I Sue for an Amazon Truck Accident?
Can I Sue for a FedEx Truck Accident?
The Benefits of Hiring a Truck Crash Lawyer
Common Truck Accident Injuries
What To Do After a Truck Accident: Steps to Take
Who Qualifies to File a Truck Accident Claim?
What Does a Truck Accident Lawyer Do?
Types of Truck Accidents
How Long Will Your Truck Accident Lawsuit Take?
How To Calculate Your Truck Accident Lawsuit Settlement
Top 5 Reasons to Hire a Truck Accident Lawyer

They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.

When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.

TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.

TorHorman Law is awesome

I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.

TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!

Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!

A very kind and professional staff.

Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.

A very respectful firm.