If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
The Ozempic lawsuit centers on allegations that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about serious risks associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 medications.
Plaintiffs allege the drug has been linked to severe gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis, as well as vision loss and other complications that have disrupted patients’ health, nutrition, employment, and daily functioning.
If you or a loved one developed gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, severe vomiting, vision loss, or other serious complications after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication, you may have legal options.
Dupixent lawsuits allege that patients treated with dupilumab therapy later developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can closely resemble severe eczema.
Research and published case reports have raised questions about whether some patients with atopic dermatitis face a higher risk of developing CTCL compared to similar patients who did not receive the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn patients and physicians about the possibility that Dupixent could worsen, accelerate, or reveal previously undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
If you or a loved one has suffered a severe reaction or blood cancer linked to Dupixent, you may be eligible to take action and file a Dupixent lawsuit.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
Legal claims against manufacturers and distributors of generic Acetaminophen have been investigated on behalf of pregnant women who used Tylenol during pregnancy and children who developed disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, and more.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims allege that these devices are defectively designed and improperly marketed without adequate warnings, leading to severe injuries for patients.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving spinal cord stimulators that allegedly caused serious injury instead of the relief patients were led to expect.
If you or a loved one experienced complications following spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to pursue compensation through a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Roblox lawsuit claims center on allegations that the platform allowed predators to groom, exploit, and abuse children through unsafe design and inadequate protections.
TorHoerman Law is dedicated to helping families who believe their child was harmed on Roblox pursue justice and financial recovery.
For many families, legal action represents both a path to compensation and a way to demand systemic change in how Roblox treats the safety of its youngest players.
If your child was sexually abused, exploited, or exposed to harmful content through Roblox, you may be eligible to take legal action by filing a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Olympus Scope lawsuit claims center on allegations that certain reusable Olympus endoscopes and related accessories exposed patients to dangerous bacterial contamination after medical procedures.
These infections can lead to hospitalization, IV antibiotic treatment, sepsis, organ failure, and death, leaving many patients with serious medical complications and lasting physical harm.
You may qualify to file an Olympus scope lawsuit if you underwent an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure involving Olympus equipment and later developed a serious bacterial infection.
Families who lost a loved one after infection-related complications linked to an Olympus scope procedure may also be able to pursue a wrongful death claim.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Breast mesh lawsuits involve allegations that certain mesh products used during breast reconstruction, augmentation, and lift procedures contributed to postoperative complications and the need for revision surgeries.
Patients who experienced complications after mesh-assisted breast procedures have reported chronic pain, reconstruction problems, cosmetic deformities, and additional revision surgeries.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications after breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra technique, you may be eligible to pursue a breast mesh lawsuit claim for the harm caused.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit claims that defective implantable ports have caused patients to suffer dangerous fractures, blood clots, and infections due to the breakdown of the catheter’s material inside the body.
These failures can lead to life-threatening complications such as embolism, sepsis, or the need for surgical removal of the device.
If you or a loved one experienced severe complications such as blood clots, infections, or catheter fractures requiring surgery due to a defective AngioDynamics port catheter, you may be eligible to file an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit and seek compensation.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Nitrous oxide lawsuit claims center on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who profit from selling canisters that are widely misused as a recreational drug.
Reports link this misuse to severe neurological injuries, psychiatric symptoms, hypoxia, and deaths caused by accidents or overdose.
These cases are rapidly expanding as more evidence emerges of the profound physical, psychological, and social toll caused by nitrous oxide misuse.
If you or a loved one has suffered brain injuries, spinal cord or nerve damage, psychiatric symptoms, or even death linked to misused nitrous oxide, you may be eligible to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit claim and seek compensation for the harm caused.
Diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit claims center on allegations that repeated inhalation of butter-flavoring chemicals in certain workplaces, including diacetyl and related substitutes, caused permanent and preventable airway damage.
Popcorn lung, medically known as bronchiolitis obliterans or constrictive bronchiolitis, is a serious obstructive lung disease that scars and narrows the small airways, leaving many people with persistent shortness of breath, chronic cough, and reduced exercise tolerance.
TorHoerman Law has experience handling diacetyl popcorn lung cases and is currently reviewing claims from workers who believe occupational exposure to these flavoring chemicals contributed to their diagnosis.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with diacetyl induced lung disease or bronchiolitis obliterans, you may have grounds to pursue a diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit for the harm caused to your lung tissue and long-term lung function.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Trampoline Park Injury Lawsuit.
Was Your Child Injured at a Trampoline Park? Contact TorHoerman Law
A Trampoline Park Injury Lawyer can help your family determine whether unsafe equipment, poor supervision, overcrowding, or ignored safety rules caused your child’s injury.
Trampoline park accidents can result in broken bones, concussions, torn ligaments, neck injuries, back injuries, and other serious harm requiring medical care.
If your child was injured at a trampoline park, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to learn whether your family may have a legal claim.
Trampoline Park Accidents Often Result in Serious Injuries
If your child was hurt at a trampoline park, you may be facing medical bills, follow-up appointments, missed work, and difficult questions about how the injury happened.
What may first appear to be a simple accident may involve unsafe conditions, poor supervision, defective equipment, overcrowded jump areas, or employees who failed to enforce the park’s own safety rules.
Trampoline park injuries can be serious.
Children may suffer broken bones, concussions, torn ligaments, neck injuries, back injuries, dental trauma, growth plate injuries, or other injuries that require emergency room care, orthopedic treatment, physical therapy, or surgery.
These injuries often happen during normal jumping, flips, dodgeball, foam pit landings, or collisions with other jumpers.
A trampoline park injury lawyer can help determine whether your child’s injury was preventable.
TorHoerman Law investigates these cases by reviewing incident reports, medical records, witness accounts, surveillance footage, waiver language, maintenance records, staff training materials, and the condition of the equipment involved.
Our attorneys look for signs that the park failed to protect children from known hazards, including worn trampoline mats, inadequate padding, unsafe foam pits, overcrowding, or larger jumpers being allowed near smaller children.
You do not have to accept the park’s explanation without asking questions.
If your child was injured at a trampoline park, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to learn whether your family may have a legal claim.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify today.
A trampoline park injury lawyer investigates whether a child or adult was hurt because a trampoline park failed to follow reasonable safety practices, enforce safety rules, maintain equipment, or protect jumpers from unsafe conditions.
Trampoline park injuries can involve broken bones, head injuries, neck trauma, torn ligaments, spinal injuries, and other serious injuries that require medical attention, emergency room visits, orthopedic surgeons, or emergency surgery.
Unlike backyard trampolines or home trampolines, a commercial trampoline park often includes connected jumping courts, foam pits, dodgeball areas, climbing attractions, birthday party events, and spaces where multiple people jump at the same time.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has reported that most trampoline injuries occur with multiple simultaneous users on the trampoline mat, and cervical spine injuries often involve falls, somersaults, or flips.
A lawyer can help by identifying what went wrong, preserving evidence, reviewing waiver language, investigating whether the park violated its own safety rules, and determining whether trampoline park owners, employees, manufacturers, or maintenance contractors may be liable.
A trampoline park injury lawyer may:
Investigate how the trampoline accident happened
Review video footage, incident reports, and witness statements
Determine whether safety rules were enforced
Examine the trampoline mat, trampoline frame, protective pads, foam pits, and other equipment
Review the park’s employee manual, training materials, and inspection records
Determine whether an employee manual obtained in litigation shows ignored safety practices
Analyze liability waivers and whether they apply to the injured child
Work with medical experts, orthopedic surgeons, safety experts, or engineers
Identify all parties that may be responsible
Pursue compensation for medical care, pain, long-term injuries, and other losses
When Should You Contact a Trampoline Park Injury Lawyer?
You should contact a trampoline park injury lawyer after any severe injury, injury involving a child, disputed accident, denied claim, or situation where a waiver is being used to discourage your family from seeking legal help.
Trampoline park accidents can become difficult to prove if the park repairs equipment, deletes surveillance footage, changes staffing records, or refuses to provide an incident report.
Contacting a lawyer early is especially important when injuries happen during jumping, flips, foam pit landings, dodgeball, risky stunts, overcrowding, or a collision caused by a double bounce.
A double bounce can occur when a larger jumper lands near a smaller child, creating greater force that throws the child off balance.
These accidents are common in trampoline parks because younger kids, older children, teens, and adults may be jumping in nearby areas at the same time.
You should consider legal help if:
A child was taken to the emergency room
The injury required surgery or specialist treatment
The child suffered broken bones, head injuries, neck injuries, or torn ligaments
The park blamed your child without explaining what happened
Another child, teen, or adult caused the injury
The accident involved foam pits, flips, or high-risk attractions
Equipment appeared worn, damaged, or poorly maintained
Protective pads were missing, thin, loose, or shifted
A waiver or liability release is being used to deny responsibility
The park refuses to preserve video footage or provide records
Serious Injuries Requiring Medical Treatment
A trampoline park injury claim is more likely when the person hurt needed medical care beyond basic first aid.
Most injuries are not catastrophic, but trampoline park injuries can become serious when a jumper lands wrong, hits the trampoline frame, collides with another person, falls into a hard padded area, or strikes a surface beneath or outside the trampoline.
Common trampoline injuries that may support a legal claim include:
Broken bones, including wrist, arm, ankle, tibia, fibula, femur, and lower leg bones
Concussions and traumatic brain injuries
Neck and back injuries
Torn ACL, MCL, or ankle ligaments
Dislocations
Dental or facial trauma
Spinal cord injuries
Growth plate injuries in children
Severe bruising, swelling, and soft tissue damage
Injuries requiring emergency surgery
Injuries causing chronic pain or mobility problems
A study published in Pediatrics reviewed 18 trampoline parks and found 13,256 injured users across 8,387,178 jumper hours, with 11% classified as significant injuries.
Injury rates were highest in high-performance areas and inflatable bag or foam pit areas.
Injuries Involving Children
Children are often at greater risk in trampoline park accidents because they may not understand the force created by multiple people jumping around them.
Small children and younger kids can be injured when older children, teens, or adults bounce nearby.
Children younger in age may also be less able to avoid collisions, stop risky stunts, or recognize unsafe equipment.
A trampoline park injury lawyer can investigate whether the park failed to protect children by allowing overcrowding, failing to separate jumpers by age or size, or failing to enforce rules for only one child or one jumper in a designated area.
These failures can lead to preventable injuries.
Child injury cases may involve:
A little girl or young boy injured during a birthday party
A child hurt by a larger jumper
A small child injured during open jump time with older children
A child thrown by double bounce force
A child hurt after attempting flips in an unsafe area
A child injured in foam pits or on a hard landing surface
A child hurt because employees failed to enforce safety rules
In these cases, the legal issue is not whether jumping on a trampoline carries some risk.
The issue is whether the park increased that risk by failing to use reasonable safety measures.
Situations Involving Waivers or Disputed Liability
Trampoline parks often require parents to sign liability waivers before kids can jump.
Some parks use online waiver language before a birthday party or require a release at check-in.
A waiver may mention assumed risk, trampoline related injuries, jumping hazards, collisions, equipment risk, or agreement to arbitrate.
A signed waiver does not automatically end a case.
Waiver rules vary by state, and courts may treat claims involving minors differently from adult personal injury cases.
In 2025, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed cases involving minors injured at Sky Zone trampoline parks and held that the participation agreements and arbitration provisions signed by one parent were not enforceable against the injured minors or non-signing parents under those circumstances.
A lawyer can review:
Who signed the waiver
Whether the injured person was a child
Whether both parents signed
Whether the waiver language clearly covered the accident
Whether the park followed its own safety rules
Whether the claim involves gross negligence or reckless indifference
Whether state safety laws limit or affect waiver enforcement
Whether other defendants, such as equipment manufacturers, are outside the waiver
How a Lawyer Investigates a Trampoline Park Injury
A trampoline park injury lawyer investigates both the accident and the business practices behind it.
The goal is to determine whether the injury happened because of unsafe conditions, poor supervision, defective equipment, inadequate maintenance, or a failure to enforce safety rules.
An investigation may include:
Requesting surveillance video before it is deleted
Reviewing the incident report
Interviewing witnesses
Photographing the trampoline, foam pits, trampoline mat, trampoline frame, padding, and surrounding areas
Determining whether protective pads were missing, thin, loose, or worn
Reviewing employee training records
Requesting the employee manual
Examining inspection and maintenance logs
Investigating prior injuries at the same park
Reviewing state safety laws and applicable standards
Evaluating whether federal regulations apply to any specific attraction or equipment
Consulting experts on trampoline safety, biomechanics, engineering, or medical causation
In some cases, an employee manual obtained during litigation may become important evidence.
If the manual required staff to stop flips, separate younger kids from older children, monitor foam pits, or enforce only-one-jumper rules, a violation of those rules may support liability.
Proving Liability in a Trampoline Park Injury Case
To prove liability, the injured person generally must show that someone owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused an injury.
In a trampoline park case, the responsible party may be the park operator, property owner, franchisor, equipment manufacturer, installer, or maintenance company.
Evidence may show liability when:
Employees failed to enforce safety rules
Multiple people were allowed to jump in a dangerous way
Small children were allowed to jump near adults or older children
The park failed to separate jumpers by size, age, or skill
The trampoline mat was torn or worn
The trampoline frame was exposed
Protective pads were missing or inadequate
Foam pits were poorly maintained
Employees ignored risky stunts
The park failed to inspect equipment
The park violated its own safety rules
Prior injuries happened under similar conditions
Personal injury cases involving trampoline park injuries often depend on video footage, employee testimony, company policies, inspection records, and expert review.
A lawyer can connect the unsafe condition to the child’s injury and show why the accident was preventable.
Challenges in Trampoline Park Injury Claims
Trampoline park injury claims can be challenging because parks often argue that injuries happen even when the park did nothing wrong.
They may claim the injured person assumed the risk, violated safety rules, attempted flips, landed incorrectly, or was hurt by another jumper rather than by the park.
Common defense arguments include:
The child or parent signed a waiver
The injury was an inherent risk of jumping
The child ignored posted rules
Another child caused the injury
The parent failed to supervise the child
The park had adequate safety measures
The equipment was not defective
The injury was not as serious as claimed
The claimant waited too long to seek treatment
A lawyer responds by gathering facts.
If evidence shows unsafe conditions, poor supervision, defective equipment, missing protective pads, a dangerous foam pit, or a failure to follow safety practices, the park’s defenses may not end the case.
Defending Against Claims of Assumed Risk
Trampoline parks often argue that a person assumes the risk by choosing to jump.
That argument may apply to ordinary risks, but it does not necessarily protect a park from liability for preventable injuries caused by negligence.
A child may understand that jumping can lead to a fall.
That does not mean the child or parent accepted the risk of torn equipment, exposed hardware, unsafe foam pits, poor supervision, overcrowding, or reckless indifference to known hazards.
A lawyer may defend against assumed-risk arguments by showing:
The risk was hidden or not obvious
The park increased the risk through poor operations
The child was too young to understand the danger
Employees failed to enforce safety rules
The park violated its own safety rules
The injury involved defective or poorly maintained equipment
The waiver language did not clearly cover the accident
The park acted with cavalier disregard for safety
The AAP has cautioned that trampoline safety measures have not appeared to substantially reduce risk in some settings and discourages home trampoline use.
That medical guidance can help explain why commercial facilities must take safety seriously, especially when children are involved.
A trampoline park injury lawyer can pursue compensation for the losses caused by the accident.
The value of a claim depends on the injury, treatment, long-term effects, liability evidence, state law, and insurance coverage.
Compensation may include:
Emergency room bills
Ambulance costs
Diagnostic imaging
Surgery and hospital care
Orthopedic treatment
Physical therapy
Follow-up medical care
Medication and medical devices
Future medical treatment
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
Scarring or disfigurement
Loss of mobility or function
Parent wage loss related to caring for an injured child
Reduced quality of life
Permanent disability
Punitive damages may be available in limited cases involving gross negligence, reckless indifference, or a conscious disregard for safety.
These damages are not available in every case and depend on state law and the specific facts.
Confidentiality agreements may also affect what the public can learn about prior settlements.
If a trampoline park settled previous injury claims under confidentiality agreements, public reports may not show the full history of accidents at that location.
TorHoerman Law: Investigating Trampoline Injuries Suffered at Commercial Establishments
TorHoerman Law is investigating trampoline injuries suffered at commercial establishments, including trampoline parks, indoor adventure parks, foam pit attractions, and facilities operating under national brands such as Sky Zone, Urban Air, Altitude, and other park operators.
These cases may involve children, adults, birthday party guests, or families who were told the activity was safe and fun but left with serious injuries.
Our team investigates whether the park failed to protect jumpers from unsafe conditions, overcrowding, poorly maintained equipment, risky stunts, dangerous foam pits, or collisions involving multiple people.
We also review whether the park’s own safety rules, employee manual, inspection logs, or training materials show that staff should have prevented the accident.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation if you or your child was injured at a trampoline park.
You can also use the chatbot on this page.
A lawyer can review what happened, explain whether you may have a claim, and help protect your family’s right to pursue compensation.
You may still be able to sue even if your child or a parent signed a waiver.
Liability waivers do not automatically defeat claims involving children, defective equipment, unsafe conditions, gross negligence, or conduct that violates state law.
In a 2025 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case involving Sky Zone trampoline parks, the court held that agreements signed by one parent did not bind injured minors or non-signing parents under the facts of those cases.
The park may still be responsible if another child caused the injury.
Many trampoline park accidents happen because multiple people jump too close together, older children jump near younger kids, or staff fail to enforce safety rules.
If the park failed to supervise jumpers, separate children by age or size, or stop unsafe behavior, the injury may have been preventable.
The deadline to file a trampoline park injury claim depends on the state where the accident happened and whether the injured person was a child or adult.
Some states give minors additional time, while others have strict notice or filing rules that can shorten the practical timeline.
You should speak with a lawyer as soon as possible so evidence can be preserved and the correct deadline can be calculated.
The most important evidence often includes surveillance video, the incident report, witness names, photos of the trampoline area, medical records, and the waiver.
Equipment evidence may also matter, including photos of the trampoline mat, trampoline frame, protective pads, foam pits, and any hard padded area where the child landed.
A lawyer may also request the park’s employee manual, safety practices, inspection logs, maintenance records, and prior accident reports.
Trampoline park injuries that usually lead to lawsuits are serious injuries requiring medical treatment, emergency room visits, surgery, or long-term care.
These may include broken bones, head injuries, traumatic brain injuries, neck injuries, spinal cord injuries, torn ligaments, and injuries involving lower leg bones.
Lawsuits are more likely when the injury appears connected to unsafe conditions, poor supervision, overcrowding, defective equipment, or failure to enforce safety rules.
Potentially liable parties may include trampoline park owners, local operators, franchisees, franchisors, property owners, equipment manufacturers, installers, maintenance contractors, or staffing companies.
Liability depends on what caused the injury and who had control over the unsafe condition.
In some cases, more than one person or company may be responsible for the accident.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
Legally Reviewed
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
Fact-Checked
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
Additional Trampoline Park Injury Lawsuit resources on our website:
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.