Active Litigation
UHS Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the UHS Lawsuit.
Active Litigation
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the UHS Lawsuit.
The Two Rivers Behavioral Health abuse lawsuit investigation centers on allegations that patients may have been harmed or placed at risk while receiving psychiatric treatment at the Kansas City facility before its closure.
Although the hospital shut down in 2019, past incidents involving safety failures, sexual-misconduct allegations, and regulatory actions have led attorneys to examine whether former patients may have viable claims against the facility and its parent company, Universal Health Services.
TorHoerman Law is now reviewing potential cases to determine whether survivors may be eligible to pursue accountability for what occurred at Two Rivers.

Two Rivers Behavioral Health System operated for more than three decades as a psychiatric hospital in Kansas City, offering mental health treatment to children, adolescents, adults, and vulnerable patients who relied on the facility for adequate and appropriate services.
Once owned by Universal Health Services Inc., Two Rivers was part of one of the largest behavioral health facilities networks in the country, a system that has faced widespread scrutiny in recent years.
Although Two Rivers closed in 2019, past incidents and reports have led attorneys to examine whether patients were exposed to preventable harm, including failures in supervision and lapses that may have increased the risk of sexual assault.
Former patients and advocates have raised concerns that some individuals may have experienced mistreatment or boundary violations during their time at the hospital, prompting closer review of how staff were selected, trained, and monitored.
Lawyers are evaluating whether the issues documented at other UHS-operated behavioral programs (such as allegations of systemic abuse, improper oversight, and inadequate staffing) may have had parallels at Two Rivers.
This broader pattern, combined with prior regulatory actions and incident reports, has led survivors and families to speak with attorneys about potential sexual abuse lawsuits connected to the facility’s historical operations.
Although no large-scale litigation has yet emerged from Two Rivers specifically, the allegations reported in related cases and disciplinary actions at the hospital raise important questions about the safety of the treatment environment.
As this review continues, survivors who were harmed while seeking psychiatric care at Two Rivers may now have an opportunity to seek justice and explore their legal rights with the support of qualified counsel.
If you or a loved one suffered harm, neglect, or possible sexual assault while receiving care at Two Rivers Behavioral Health System, you may be eligible to pursue a civil claim and seek accountability for what happened.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page for a free and confidential case evaluation.
Two Rivers Behavioral Health System was a former UHS facility located in Kansas City, Missouri, operating for more than three decades as a private psychiatric hospital providing mental health care to children, adolescents, adults, and older adults.
The hospital treated a wide range of mental health issues through inpatient hospitalization, partial hospitalization programs, and residential treatment services that were often used by individuals experiencing acute psychiatric crises.
As part of Universal Health Services (UHS), Two Rivers functioned within a national network of behavioral-health institutions that has faced widespread allegations at UHS facilities related to inadequate staffing, unsafe environments, and failures in clinical oversight.
These broader concerns have prompted attorneys to reevaluate whether similar problems may have impacted patients at Two Rivers, particularly individuals who later reported feeling unsafe or improperly supervised.
While the facility offered structured psychiatric programs, older regulatory actions and patient accounts have raised questions about whether Two Rivers sometimes failed to protect vulnerable patients during their time in care.
The historical record includes reports of misconduct by individual providers and serious safety lapses, contributing to ongoing review of whether any residents or inpatients were exposed to preventable harm.
As with other UHS-operated hospitals, allegations of neglect, boundary violations, and, in isolated cases, sexual violence have become part of the larger conversation about how private psychiatric systems function and how their oversight mechanisms may fall short.
Two Rivers Behavioral Health System was established in October 1986 as a 105-bed, free-standing psychiatric hospital located at 5121 Raytown Road, Kansas City, Missouri.
The hospital provided inpatient, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient psychiatric services under the ownership and operation of Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS), a major for-profit behavioral-health corporation.
Over time, UHS’s corporate decisions (including staffing policies, budgets, oversight mechanisms, and program design) governed the hospital’s operations and thus are relevant in reviewing any institutional failures.
The hospital’s official “Open Letter” confirms that, after more than 30 years of service, Two Rivers closed on February 9, 2019, when UHS opted to cease the facility’s operations.
Because the facility is now closed, any civil claims will often involve UHS as the owning entity, with attorneys examining both facility-level conduct and corporate-level oversight.
Timeline of ownership & corporate milestones:
Universal Health Services (UHS), one of the largest operators of psychiatric institutions and behavioral health programs in the United States, is facing multiple lawsuits alleging that patients (many of them children and teens) were subjected to sexual abuse, unsafe conditions, and chronic neglect at several of its facilities.
In Illinois alone, civil complaints accuse UHS-operated hospitals of exposing minors to sexual assault, patient-on-patient abuse, excessive or inappropriate physical and chemical restraints, and retaliation when youth reported mistreatment.
Survivors and their attorneys describe chronic understaffing, unqualified or poorly supervised employees, and repeated staff misconduct as core drivers of the harm.
A major 2024–2025 Illinois lawsuit filed on behalf of more than 100 former minor patients alleges systemic abuse, including sexual assault and emotional and physical abuse, across multiple UHS youth treatment programs.
Public reporting and legal filings identify a cluster of UHS facilities where abuse is alleged to have occurred, particularly in Illinois youth and adolescent programs:
These cases collectively allege that UHS failed to protect some of its most vulnerable patients, allowed hazardous conditions to persist, and did not correct known regulatory violations or safety problems.
Alongside these abuse claims, UHS has also faced major False Claims Act allegations brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and whistleblowers.
In 2020, UHS and certain affiliates agreed to pay $122 million to resolve alleged violations of the False Claims Act, including about $117 million to the United States and states for billing federal healthcare beneficiaries (Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, VA, FEHBP) for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services and for failing to provide adequate and appropriate services to adults and children.
The settlement also addressed allegations that UHS and a Georgia facility, Turning Point Care Center, paid illegal inducements or illegal kickbacks to certain beneficiaries to drive admissions and length of stay, further undermining clinical decision-making.
As part of that resolution, UHS entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General at the Department of Health and Human Services, requiring enhanced compliance, monitoring, and quality-of-care oversight at its behavioral health facilities.
While the False Claims Act case focused on billing and quality-of-care violations rather than sexual abuse specifically, the government’s findings echo themes raised in survivor lawsuits: unnecessary hospitalization, inadequate treatment, and systemic disregard for patient welfare.
Two Rivers Behavioral Health System has become the subject of renewed scrutiny as attorneys review whether psychiatric patients may have faced harm or exploitation while receiving care at the facility.
As a former Universal Health Services (UHS) hospital, the facility operated within a national network of behavioral health programs that has faced widespread criticism for inadequate oversight and reports of institutional abuse.
Advocates have noted that some of the most vulnerable patients, including individuals with severe mental health conditions, may have been placed in environments where safety lapses or boundary violations went undetected.
Although public records primarily document isolated misconduct by providers and past safety failures, these incidents raise questions about whether broader systemic failures influenced patient experiences at this UHS facility.
Attorneys reviewing the facility’s history are considering whether any former residents or inpatients were sexually assaulted, exposed to predatory conduct, or otherwise suffered abuse while under the hospital’s supervision.
Because Two Rivers was part of a large national corporation with multiple regulatory actions across its behavioral-health footprint, survivors and families are now examining whether similar issues may have occurred in Missouri.
This review does not assume wrongdoing but reflects the need to understand how patterns seen at other UHS hospitals may have shaped local conditions.
As investigations continue, former patients may have an opportunity to hold UHS accountable if evidence shows their experiences were linked to institutional shortcomings rather than isolated acts.
Publicly available records and reporting show that concerns around Two Rivers Behavioral Health System stem from a combination of individual misconduct cases and broader safety failures documented during the facility’s operation.
Regulatory findings linked to patient monitoring lapses, including a high-profile suicide that led to federal intervention, raised questions about whether vulnerable psychiatric patients were adequately protected.
Separate civil filings describe situations in which former patients alleged inappropriate or sexually exploitative behavior by clinicians, adding to concerns about institutional abuse in a setting meant to provide care and stability.
These incidents, though varying in nature, collectively highlight potential weaknesses in supervision, hiring, and oversight within the facility and its parent corporation, Universal Health Services (UHS).
Attorneys reviewing the facility’s history are now examining whether these lapses reflect broader systemic failures rather than isolated episodes.
As investigations continue, these reports serve as an important starting point for assessing whether former patients may have grounds to seek accountability.
Incidents referenced in public reports include:
Public records show that at least one documented instance of sexual misconduct occurred at Two Rivers Behavioral Health System, involving a psychiatrist who allegedly exploited a patient during her psychiatric treatment.
In that case, the patient reported that she was in a fragile mental-health state and that the clinician engaged in sexual acts and inappropriate demands while she was under his care.
Regulatory records later confirmed that the same psychiatrist had his medical license suspended for inappropriate relationships with patients, supporting the seriousness of the allegations tied to the facility.
While these incidents do not indicate widespread sexual abuse on the scale seen at other institutions, they raise significant concerns about patient safety and professional oversight inside the hospital.
Investigators also note that Two Rivers was operated by Universal Health Services (UHS), a corporation with a national history of scrutiny related to staffing shortages, inadequate patient monitoring, and abuse-risk issues at multiple behavioral-health programs.
This broader context has prompted attorneys to question whether the sexual-misconduct cases and other safety failures at Two Rivers reflect isolated events or part of a larger pattern of institutional weakness.
Even without multiple confirmed victims, the documented misconduct and regulatory actions indicate that vulnerable psychiatric patients may have been exposed to preventable harm.
For former patients who believe they experienced inappropriate behavior, boundary violations, or sexual exploitation, it may be worthwhile to speak with an attorney to determine whether their experiences align with known incidents and whether they may have a potential civil sexual abuse lawsuit claim.
Individuals may qualify for a Two Rivers abuse lawsuit if they were harmed, exploited, or placed at risk while receiving psychiatric treatment at the Kansas City facility before its closure in 2019.
Former psychiatric patients who experienced inappropriate conduct, boundary violations, or sexual exploitation by clinicians or staff may be eligible to pursue a civil claim.
Survivors who were admitted for serious mental health conditions and believe they were mistreated, ignored, or left unsafe during their stay may also have grounds for legal action.
Because some documented incidents at Two Rivers involved failures in supervision and clinician misconduct, attorneys are reviewing whether other patients may have been exposed to similar risks.
Individuals who reported concerns in the past but felt their complaints were dismissed or minimized may still qualify, even if their reports were not investigated at the time.
Claims may also be evaluated for patients harmed by severe safety lapses, including inadequate monitoring or neglect in high-risk situations.
Importantly, eligibility is not limited to those involved in past lawsuits: patients who recognize abusive or inappropriate behavior only years later may still have options under Missouri law.
Speaking with an attorney can help determine whether your experience aligns with known patterns at Two Rivers and whether you may have a viable claim against the facility or Universal Health Services.
Survivors considering a civil claim connected to Two Rivers should know that solid evidence is not always necessary at the outset, especially in cases involving psychiatric settings where patients had limited control over records, communication, or personal safety.
Many individuals treated for serious mental health conditions were not in a position to gather evidence, and the law allows claims to proceed based on credible testimony, documentation obtained later, and institutional records secured through legal channels.
Attorneys can request charts, staffing logs, disciplinary files, and regulatory materials directly from Universal Health Services, even years after the facility closed.
What matters most is the survivor’s account and any details they can recall about their treatment, environment, or interactions with staff.
Potential evidence that may help support a Two Rivers case includes:
The statute of limitations for psychiatric-abuse claims in Missouri depends on the survivor’s age at the time of the misconduct and when they became aware of the harm.
For adults who were 18 or older during their treatment, most civil injury claims must generally be filed within five years, though certain claims related to medical negligence or assault may have shorter or different deadlines.
Survivors who experienced sexual abuse as minors, however, fall under Missouri’s child-sexual-abuse statute (§ 537.046), which allows claims to be filed until the survivor’s 31st birthday or within three years of discovering the connection between the abuse and later harm, whichever is later.
This extended window recognizes that many psychiatric patients, especially those treated for trauma or severe mental health conditions, may not understand the nature or impact of abuse until years after it occurs.
Because Two Rivers closed in 2019, records still exist and can often be obtained even if the events happened long ago, but timing remains crucial.
Anyone who believes they were harmed at Two Rivers should speak with an attorney promptly to determine the specific deadlines that apply to their situation.
Damages in a civil lawsuit for sexual abuse are the financial and non-financial losses a survivor can recover when a psychiatric facility’s negligence or misconduct causes harm.
In potential cases involving Two Rivers, damages often reflect the emotional, psychological, and long-term effects of abuse or unsafe treatment conditions, particularly for patients who were already vulnerable due to mental health needs.
Attorneys evaluate each survivor’s experience individually, considering the impact on daily life, long-term functioning, and access to appropriate care.
These damages are not just about what happened in the moment.
They address the lasting consequences of trauma and the support a survivor may need moving forward.
Potential damages available to survivors include:
If you suspect that you or your loved one has experienced abuse in a Missouri psychiatric or residential facility, it’s important to know that you are not alone and help is available.
You can reach out to trained professionals who offer immediate guidance, confidential support, and pathways toward legal and medical assistance.
Even if the abuse happened years ago during treatment, gathering information now and connecting with resources can strengthen your ability to pursue justice and recovery.
Timely reporting also helps preserve records, initiate investigations, and affirm your rights as a survivor.
Trusted resources for reporting abuse and seeking help:
The concerns surrounding Two Rivers Behavioral Health System reflect a broader pattern of institutional breakdowns that may have contributed to a failure to protect patients during some of the most vulnerable moments of their lives.
As former residents come forward and attorneys review historical records, it has become increasingly important to understand how the facility’s practices (and the corporate oversight of Universal Health Services) may have shaped patient experiences.
TorHoerman Law is actively evaluating potential UHS lawsuit claims to determine whether survivors of negligence, exploitation, or unsafe conditions at Two Rivers may have legal options today.
Our team approaches these cases with a focus on compassion, evidence-based investigation, and the serious responsibility of holding large behavioral-health providers accountable for past misconduct.
If you or a loved one suffered harm while receiving care at Two Rivers Behavioral Health System, contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your experience in a confidential consultation.
Our team can help you understand your rights and determine whether you may be eligible to pursue a civil claim.
Two Rivers Behavioral Health System was a 105-bed psychiatric hospital in Kansas City, Missouri that operated from 1986 until its closure in 2019.
It provided inpatient care, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient programs for children, adolescents, adults, and older adults experiencing serious mental health conditions.
The facility treated a wide range of psychiatric and behavioral health needs, including crisis stabilization, trauma-related disorders, and dual-diagnosis conditions.
Two Rivers was owned and operated by Universal Health Services (UHS), one of the largest for-profit behavioral-health corporations in the country.
Because of its corporate structure and documented safety issues, the facility has since become part of broader investigations into past misconduct and patient-harm allegations within UHS-operated programs.
Two Rivers Behavioral Health System was owned and operated by Universal Health Services (UHS), one of the largest for-profit behavioral health corporations in the United States.
UHS managed Two Rivers through subsidiary entities, including Two Rivers Psychiatric Hospital, Inc., which handled licensing, staffing, and administrative oversight.
As a UHS facility, Two Rivers followed corporate policies and clinical guidelines shaped at the national level, meaning decisions about staffing, budgeting, and safety protocols were influenced by the parent company rather than local leadership alone.
This corporate structure also placed Two Rivers within a broader network of UHS psychiatric institutions that have faced regulatory scrutiny, federal investigations, and civil lawsuits over the past decade.
The facility operated under UHS from its opening in 1986 until its closure in 2019, when UHS announced a corporate decision to cease operations and lay off more than 100 employees.
Because of this relationship, any potential legal claims involving Two Rivers may also involve examining UHS’s role in oversight, hiring, and safety conditions.
Understanding UHS’s ownership is essential for evaluating accountability and determining whether corporate decisions contributed to patient harm.
Sexual abuse allegations at UHS-operated facilities often involve misconduct by staff, clinicians, or other individuals who had direct access to vulnerable patients in psychiatric or residential settings.
Civil lawsuits and public reporting describe incidents where children, adolescents, and adults in treatment settings were exposed to unsafe environments, inadequate supervision, or predatory behavior.
Because many patients were admitted for serious mental health concerns, they were often unable to advocate for themselves or recognize grooming behaviors until long after the abuse occurred.
These cases suggest patterns of misconduct that may arise when facilities lack proper oversight, screening, staffing, and reporting procedures.
Survivors continue to come forward describing a range of harmful behaviors that can form the basis of a civil claim.
Types of sexual abuse alleged at UHS facilities include:
Yes, you may still be able to file a claim even if the abuse at Two Rivers happened many years ago.
Missouri law gives adult survivors a limited window to file psychiatric-abuse or negligence claims, but those timelines can vary depending on the type of harm, when you discovered its impact, and how the case is structured.
Survivors of childhood sexual abuse have significantly more time, as Missouri’s child-sexual-abuse statute allows claims until age 31 or within three years of realizing the abuse caused injury.
Many former psychiatric patients also did not understand the harm at the time because of their mental health conditions or the power imbalance inside the facility, and the “discovery rule” may extend their filing window.
Even though Two Rivers closed in 2019, records and documentation can still be obtained through legal channels.
The best way to determine whether you still qualify is to speak with an attorney who can evaluate your specific timeline and the facts of your case.
Lawsuits can still move forward even if a facility like Two Rivers Behavioral Health System has closed, because legal claims are brought against the entities responsible for the harm, not the physical building.
In this case, Universal Health Services (UHS), the corporation that owned and operated Two Rivers, continues to exist and can be named in civil lawsuits for misconduct that occurred while the hospital was open.
The closure of a facility does not erase corporate liability, nor does it eliminate the records, staffing logs, regulatory findings, or internal documents that attorneys can request through legal processes.
Many psychiatric-abuse and institutional-neglect cases are filed years after misconduct occurred, especially when survivors only recognize the impact of the harm later.
Missouri law also allows attorneys to obtain historical records (such as patient charts, personnel files, disciplinary actions, and CMS reports) long after a facility shuts down.
Courts routinely handle cases involving closed residential treatment centers, hospitals, and youth facilities by focusing on the corporate owners, insurers, and other responsible parties.
Even if former staff have moved or the facility no longer operates, lawyers can identify relevant witnesses and secure testimony through subpoenas or sworn statements.
For survivors, this means that the closure of Two Rivers does not prevent you from pursuing accountability if evidence shows you were harmed while under its care.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our UHS Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.