(888) 508-6752

Severe Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery: Can You File a Claim?

4.9
Google
•
705 reviews

Lawsuits for Severe Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery

Some soreness and discomfort are expected after spinal cord stimulator surgery, but severe or worsening pain may signal a complication.

Concerning pain can occur with electric shocks, burning sensations, infection, lead migration, hardware problems, neurological symptoms, or loss of previously effective stimulation.

Severe pain alone does not establish that a spinal cord stimulator was defective or that medical care was negligent.

A potential legal claim depends on the cause of the pain, the device or procedure involved, the medical treatment required, and the evidence connecting the injury to a product defect, inadequate warning, or other actionable conduct.

TorHoerman Law is reviewing claims from individuals who suffered serious complications after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, including severe pain, failed pain relief, abnormal stimulation, lead migration, neurological symptoms, revision surgery, and explant surgery.

Severe Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery Can You File a Claim

Severe Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery: Overview

Spinal cord stimulators are implanted devices used to manage chronic pain when medications, physical therapy, injections, or other treatments have not provided enough relief.

The system uses leads placed in the epidural space to deliver electrical stimulation intended to alter or block pain signals before they reach the brain.

Some soreness and discomfort are expected after implantation, particularly around the incision and generator pocket.

Increased pain becomes more concerning when it is severe, continues to worsen, feels different from the pain being treated, or occurs with electric shocks, burning sensations, weakness, numbness, infection symptoms, or changes in stimulation.

Some patients also experience problems after a device initially worked but later failed to provide meaningful pain relief.

In those cases, medical evaluation may identify lead migration, lead fracture, generator problems, infection, unintended stimulation, or another complication affecting the implanted system.

Patients who suffered injuries beyond expected postoperative discomfort may have questions about whether the device, implantation procedure, or later medical care contributed to the problem.

TorHoerman Law is reviewing spinal cord stimulator claims involving severe pain and other serious complications after implantation.

If you or a loved one experienced significant pain or injury after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, contact our law firm for a free consultation or use the chat feature on this page to learn whether you may qualify to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.

Is Pain Normal After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery?

Some pain is normal after spinal cord stimulator surgery, especially around the incision, lead placement area, and generator pocket during the early healing period.

Many patients also notice temporary soreness, tightness, tenderness, or a tingling sensation as the body adjusts to the permanent implant and the stimulation settings are refined.

SCS therapy is intended to provide long-term pain relief, but postoperative discomfort does not disappear immediately after surgery.

Pain should generally improve as the surgical site heals, while persistent or worsening pain may require further evaluation.

Pain is more concerning when it becomes severe, spreads into a new area, feels electrical or burning, or occurs with weakness, numbness, fever, drainage, or other neurological symptoms.

Those changes can point to complications such as infection, lead migration, hardware problems, unintended stimulation, or, more rarely, spinal cord injuries.

Patients should also be evaluated if the device initially worked but later stopped providing meaningful relief or began causing new pain.

A healthcare provider may review the stimulation settings, examine the surgical site, assess the implanted hardware, or order imaging depending on the symptoms.

Possible Causes of Severe Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation

Severe pain after spinal cord stimulator implantation can result from normal postoperative healing, a problem with the implanted hardware, or a complication involving the surrounding tissue or nerves.

During the trial period, temporary leads are placed near the spinal cord, while permanent implantation places permanent leads and an implanted pulse generator beneath the skin.

Mild to moderate incision-site discomfort is common for several days after surgery and should generally improve as healing progresses.

Pain that becomes more severe, develops after an initial period of improvement, or feels different from ordinary surgical soreness may require further evaluation.

Potential causes of severe or worsening pain include:

  • Incision or postoperative pain: Tissue affected during surgery can remain sore or tender during the early healing period.
  • Implant pocket pain: The generator itself can cause persistent discomfort at the site where it is positioned beneath the skin.
  • Lead migration or fracture: Implanted leads can move, break, or lose their connection, changing where electrical signals are delivered and reducing pain relief.
  • Painful or unintended stimulation: Excessive stimulation levels or changes in lead position can produce shocks, burning, tingling, or stimulation in an unintended area.
  • Hardware malfunction: Problems involving the generator, battery, connectors, charging system, or other components can interrupt therapy or produce abnormal stimulation.
  • Infection or painful inflammation: Surgical site infection can cause worsening tenderness, redness, swelling, warmth, drainage, or fever.
  • Loss of effective pain relief: A device may continue operating but no longer provide the benefit experienced during the trial period or after implantation.
  • Nerve or spinal cord injury: Rare neurological complications can cause severe back or leg pain, numbness, weakness, or other neurological symptoms and may result in permanent nerve damage.

The cause cannot always be determined from the way the pain feels alone.

Burning pain can result from nerve irritation, painful inflammation, infection, or abnormal stimulation, while electric shocks can reflect stimulation settings, lead position, or hardware function.

A healthcare provider may use physical examination, device interrogation, programming changes, or imaging to distinguish among these possibilities.

Patients should also follow the pain medication and postoperative instructions prescribed by their treating provider while the surgical site heals.

Lead Migration or Lead Fracture

Spinal cord stimulation systems depend on thin wires that carry electrical signals from the pulse generator to electrodes positioned near the spinal cord.

Lead migration occurs when implanted leads move from their intended location, while lead fracture occurs when a lead breaks or loses electrical continuity.

Lead migration is one of the most frequently reported device-related complications.

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis involving 2,932 patients estimated lead migration in approximately 10% of spinal cord stimulator implants, with clinically recognized migration most often identified after loss of therapeutic benefit.

More recent research has produced lower estimates in some populations, illustrating how rates vary with device type, anchoring technique, and study design.

When permanent leads move or become damaged, patients may experience returning chronic or leg pain, changes in stimulation coverage, tingling, shocks, or stimulation in an unintended part of the body.

Loss of pain relief can sometimes be addressed by adjusting stimulation levels, but significant migration or lead fracture may require revision surgery.

The same issue can occur during the trial period with temporary leads, although movement during a trial does not necessarily mean that a permanent system will later migrate.

When reprogramming cannot restore effective stimulation, additional surgery may be needed to reposition or replace the affected lead.

Painful Stimulation or Hardware Malfunction

A spinal cord stimulator is intended to alter pain signaling, but problems with programming or implanted hardware can sometimes cause uncomfortable or painful stimulation instead.

Patients may describe electric shocks, sudden jolts, burning, excessive tingling, or stimulation that appears in an area outside the original pain pattern.

Changes in stimulation may result from settings that are too strong, movement of the leads, connection problems, generator malfunction, charging problems, or another hardware issue.

A 2024 review of device-related spinal cord stimulator complications identifies lead migration, lead fracture, lead disconnection, generator failure, loss of charge, hardware-related pain, and intolerance to paresthesia among recognized device-related complications.

Not every unusual sensation means the system has mechanically failed. Programming adjustments may correct some problems, while persistent symptoms may require device interrogation, imaging, or further evaluation of the implanted components.

A hardware problem may eventually require revision or replacement when the device cannot be restored through reprogramming or other nonoperative measures.

The need for removal surgery depends on the problem, whether useful pain relief can be restored, and whether keeping the system implanted remains medically appropriate.

Infection, Implant Pocket Pain, or Other Surgical Complications

Severe pain can also arise from the surgical site rather than from the electrical function of the stimulator.

Infection, wound problems, bleeding, painful inflammation, generator-pocket discomfort, and rare neurological injuries are recognized complications after implantation.

Pain at the pulse-generator site is a particular concern when discomfort persists beyond normal postoperative healing.

A 2026 study of 250 permanent spinal cord stimulator implants reported pocket pain in 6.4% of patients overall, with some patients eventually requiring revision or explantation.

The location of the generator can make pain more noticeable during sitting, bending, sleeping, or other movement.

Surgical site infection can cause increasing pain, redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, fever, or wound breakdown.

A multicenter study of 2,737 spinal cord stimulator implants reported a 2.45% infection rate. Infection involving deeper implanted components may require antibiotics and, in some cases, partial or complete device removal.

Underlying health conditions can also affect recovery. Diabetes is associated with impaired wound healing generally, and an older 707-patient spinal cord stimulation study reported infection in 9% of patients with diabetes compared with 4% of patients without diabetes, although later studies have not consistently identified diabetes as an independent SCS infection risk factor.

Rare surgical complications can cause much more serious pain and neurological symptoms.

Bleeding around the spinal cord, direct neural injury, or another complication affecting the nervous system can cause severe pain, weakness, numbness, or loss of function and may result in permanent nerve damage.

New neurological symptoms, rapidly worsening pain, or signs of deep infection after implantation warrant prompt medical evaluation.

When Should Severe Pain After a Spinal Cord Stimulator Be Evaluated?

Some soreness is expected after spinal cord stimulator implantation, but pain that is severe, worsening, or accompanied by other symptoms should be medically evaluated.

A change from the patient’s normal postoperative recovery or underlying chronic pain can indicate infection, abnormal stimulation, lead movement, hardware problems, or a neurological complication.

Medical evaluation may be particularly important when pain occurs with:

  • New weakness or numbness: Changes in strength or sensation can indicate nerve or spinal cord involvement.
  • Difficulty standing or walking: New balance problems, falls, or loss of coordination may require prompt neurological assessment.
  • Fever, redness, swelling, or drainage: These symptoms can indicate infection at the incision, generator pocket, or around implanted components.
  • Electric shocks or painful stimulation: Sudden jolts, burning sensations, or stimulation in an unintended area may reflect a programming or device-related problem.
  • Rapidly worsening back or leg pain: Pain that becomes substantially more severe rather than improving during recovery may warrant additional testing.
  • Loss of bladder or bowel control: New urinary retention, incontinence, or bowel dysfunction can be a warning sign of spinal cord compression and requires urgent medical attention.
  • Sudden loss of previously effective pain relief: A major change in stimulation coverage may indicate lead migration, lead damage, or another problem with the implanted system.

Evaluation may involve examination of the surgical site, neurological testing, review of the stimulation settings, device interrogation, or imaging to assess the leads and surrounding structures.

Severe neurological symptoms, rapidly progressing weakness, loss of bladder or bowel control, or other signs of spinal cord compression may require emergency treatment rather than routine follow-up.

Evidence That May Connect Severe Pain to the Implanted Device

Severe pain after spinal cord stimulator surgery can have several possible causes, including normal healing, therapeutic failure, a surgical complication, or a problem involving the implanted device.

In medical device litigation, the relevant evidence can help show what SCS system was implanted, how the patient responded during the spinal cord stimulator trial, what changed after permanent implantation, and whether a documented device or surgical problem coincided with the onset of pain.

Relevant evidence may include:

  • Device and implant records: The device card, manufacturer, model, implant date, spinal cord stimulator trial records, and operative reports can identify the system and establish the treatment timeline.
  • Imaging and device records: Imaging may show lead movement or device migration, while interrogation and remote control records can document programming changes or abnormal device behavior.
  • Medical records: Pain management, physical medicine, emergency, and spine surgery records may show when the patient began to feel pain and whether doctors identified a possible cause.
  • Revision or removal records: Operative reports from repeated corrective surgeries can document lead replacement, generator revision, device removal, or other findings related to the implanted system.
  • Symptom documentation: Clinical notes describing electric shocks, burning sensations, lost control of stimulation, or worsening pain may help show how the problem developed.

These records can help distinguish a device-related problem from ordinary postoperative pain, therapeutic failure, or another medical condition.

TorHoerman Law: Spinal Cord Stimulator Injury Lawyers

Current spinal cord stimulator litigation includes claims involving severe pain, abnormal stimulation, lead migration, lead fracture, device malfunctions, neurological injury, revision surgery, and device removal.

Whether a particular case may be viable depends on the device involved, the alleged device problems, the treatment details, the injuries suffered, and the evidence connecting those problems to the spinal cord stimulator.

TorHoerman Law is reviewing claims involving allegedly defective spinal cord stimulation systems and serious complications after implantation.

Qualifying cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no attorney fees unless compensation is recovered.

If you or a loved one suffered severe pain or another serious complication after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chat feature on this page for a free case review and to learn whether you may qualify to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Published by:
Share
Picture of Tor Hoerman
Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.

TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.

TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.

Additional Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit resources on our website:
All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation
News

You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit pages listed below:

Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
Can Spinal Cord Stimulators Cause Paralysis?
Is There a Spinal Cord Stimulator Class Action Lawsuit?
Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
Spinal Cord Stimulator Attorney: Lawsuits, Injuries, and Legal Claims
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
Spinal Cord Stimulator Overstimulation Symptoms
Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Complications
Spinal Cord Stimulator Risks, Injuries, and Complications
Spinal Cord Stimulator Settlement Amounts
Who Qualifies for a Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit?
Accepting ClientsMDL 3181
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Facts
Defendants
  • Boston Scientific Corporation / Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
  • Abbott Laboratories / St. Jude Medical
  • Nevro Corp. / Globus Medical, Inc.
  • Medtronic, Inc.
Injuries named in lawsuit
  • Permanent nerve damage
  • Painful electrical shocks or burns
  • Worsening or severe chronic pain
  • Lead migration or lead fracture
  • Neurological deficits
  • Autonomic dysfunction
  • Infection
  • Need for revision or device removal surgery
    You may qualify to file a claim if...
    • You received a permanent spinal cord stimulator manufactured by Boston Scientific, Abbott, Nevro, Medtronic, or another manufacturer.
    • After implantation, you developed serious complications.
    • The complications required revision surgery, device removal, repeated reprogramming, hospitalization, or other significant medical treatment.
    Have you or a loved one been injured?

    A serious injury can change your life.

    Speak with an experienced personal injury lawyer about your rights, your case, and the legal options available to you.
    Google
    •
    705 reviews
    4.9
    ★★★★★
    Recovered damages
    $4 Billion+

    Table of Contents

    Guides & Resources
    About TorHoerman Law

    TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.

    Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.

    Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

    Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

    $495 Million
    Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

    In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

    $20 Million
    Toxic Tort Injury

    In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

    $103.8 Million
    COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

    In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

    $4 Million
    Traumatic Brain Injury

    In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

    $2.8 Million
    Defective Heart Device

    In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.

    Other Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Resources

    All
    FAQs
    Injuries & Conditions
    Legal Help
    Other Resources
    Settlements & Compensation
    News