Active Litigation
Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits.
Active Litigation
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits.
Sensio coffee maker injury claims involve recalled Bella Pro Series and Cooks Steam Espresso Makers whose brew-cup handles can forcefully eject during use and shatter the glass carafe.
On March 20, 2025, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of approximately 12,300 steam espresso machines imported by Sensio Inc.
Sensio had received 18 reports of brew-cup handles ejecting, including eight reports involving burns and/or lacerations, when the recall was announced.
The affected products are the Bella Pro Series Steam Espresso Maker, model 90195, and the Cooks Steam Espresso Maker, model 22395.
These are Bella Pro Series and Cooks products imported by Sensio, rather than machines sold under a separate Sensio brand name.
A defective coffee maker may expose users to both hot-liquid hazards and broken glass, but the cause of any individual Sensio incident must be established through evidence.
TorHoerman Law is reviewing potential injury claims involving these recalled espresso machines and other defective coffee makers.

Consumers injured by an ejecting brew-cup handle, shattered carafe, hot coffee, or broken glass may have grounds for a product liability claim if an actionable product defect or inadequate warning caused the injury.
The recall documents a hazard, but it does not establish that Sensio or another company is legally responsible for every incident.
A legal review may consider the model number, how the machine was being used, the condition of its handle and carafe, and the injuries sustained.
If you or a loved one suffered burns or cuts while using a recalled Bella Pro Series or Cooks steam espresso machine, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to request a free case review.
Our law firm handles qualifying coffee maker injury cases on a contingency-fee basis, with no attorney fees charged upfront.
The CPSC’s March 20, 2025, recall notice identifies the hazard as a brew-cup handle that can eject while the espresso maker is operating.
The handle can strike and shatter the glass carafe, exposing a nearby user to hot liquid and broken glass.
The official recall identifies the following information:
The eight injury reports are a subset of the 18 reported handle-ejection incidents, not eight additional incidents.
The CPSC does not identify a specific faulty seal, clogged passage, or pressure-control component as the established cause of the handle ejections.
Whether a particular machine contained a defective component, an unsafe design, or inadequate warnings requires a product-specific investigation.
The recall covers two models sold under different product names:
Both machines are black with stainless-steel trim and measure approximately six inches wide and 12 inches high.
The words Bella Pro Series or Cooks appear on the steaming chamber.
The identifying model number appears as the Item number on a sticker beneath the machine.
The recalled espresso makers were sold at JCPenney stores nationwide, as well as online at BestBuy.com and JCPenney.com, from August 2023 through January 2025.
The machines typically cost between $40 and $60.
A buyer should compare the Item number with the official CPSC recall listing rather than relying only on the machine’s appearance.
These model numbers are not the same as those involved in Sensio’s separate 2023 pressure cooker recall.
Other Sensio appliances that do not match either recalled Item number fall outside this particular espresso-machine recall, although a separate malfunction may still warrant investigation.
The reported hazard involves two potentially dangerous events occurring together: the brew-cup handle ejects and the glass carafe may shatter.
An espresso machine normally directs heated water through its brewing components while keeping those components secured during operation.
If a brew-cup handle unexpectedly releases, it may strike the carafe or another nearby surface.
The resulting impact can send glass fragments outward, while hot coffee or water can splash onto the operator or another person nearby.
The CPSC identified both burn and laceration hazards, but its recall notice does not establish precisely why the handles detached.
The machine and the circumstances of the incident may help answer questions about how the brew-cup handle was secured and what caused it to release.
Relevant issues may include:
These are investigative possibilities, not defects independently confirmed by the recall.
In particular, the recall does not attribute the hazard to calcium buildup, hard water, poor descaling, or consumer cleaning practices.
A person who suffered an injury should not operate or disassemble the appliance to test a suspected cause.
Sensio reported eight incidents involving burn and/or laceration injuries before the March 2025 recall.
The public recall notice does not specify the severity, affected body parts, or treatment received in those eight reports.
However, an ejected handle, shattered glass carafe, and spilled hot liquid can produce different kinds of injuries depending on the circumstances.
Potential injuries include:
These are possible outcomes of the reported hazard and should not be mistaken for injuries documented in every Sensio incident report.
Scalding can occur even without exposure to boiling water, and the CPSC has not reported the temperature of the water or coffee in these particular incidents.
Medical treatment records, photographs, and follow-up notes may help establish the seriousness and lasting effects of an injury.
Immediately stop using a recalled espresso maker, even if it has not malfunctioned.
Sensio’s official recall instructions offer a $50 refund, either by check or as an electronic gift card for Best Buy or JCPenney, subject to the recall program’s verification requirements.
The company instructs consumers not to return the espresso maker to Best Buy or JCPenney stores for a refund.
For consumers who have not suffered an injury and are proceeding with the recall remedy, Sensio’s posted steps include verifying the Item number, documenting the appliance, marking its UL label, cutting its power cord, and disposing of the product as directed.
Anyone injured by a recalled espresso maker should seek legal advice before cutting the cord, destroying the label, discarding the carafe, or disposing of the appliance.
The machine and damaged components may be important evidence of how the incident occurred.
Preserving an injured consumer’s evidence and stopping use of an unsafe appliance are both important; the appliance should not be operated again merely to document the malfunction.
If you have questions about the current refund procedure, consult the Sensio recall page or contact its recall support team.
A refund for the purchase price is separate from a potential claim for medical expenses or other injuries.
A person may have grounds to pursue a product liability claim if an affected Bella Pro Series or Cooks machine unexpectedly ejected its handle, shattered its carafe, or otherwise malfunctioned and caused an injury.
An injured person does not need to know the exact mechanical cause before requesting a legal assessment.
A defective product claim must establish a legal basis for liability and a causal connection between the alleged defect and the injury.
Relevant considerations include:
An injury involving another Sensio product may require separate investigation because the models, recalls, and alleged hazards differ.
A recall does not automatically establish liability, and filing deadlines and available claims vary by state.
The CPSC identifies Sensio Inc., of New York, as the importer of the recalled machines.
Depending on the evidence and applicable state law, a claim may involve an importer, manufacturer, seller, distributor, or another company responsible for the product.
JCPenney and online retailers were listed as sales channels, but selling a recalled product does not automatically establish that a retailer is liable for every injury.
Product liability claims may involve design defects, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings, depending on the facts.
Seek medical attention for significant burns, deep cuts, eye exposure, or other concerning injuries.
After immediate medical needs are addressed, the following steps may help preserve information about the incident:
Our guide to personal injury evidence explains how physical objects, photographs, medical records, and witness accounts can be used to evaluate a claim.
If the machine has already been discarded, the remaining records may still be useful, although the missing appliance can limit technical examination.
A personal injury claim may seek financial compensation for losses caused by a defective espresso maker when the required legal elements can be established.
A Sensio recall refund addresses the purchase of the appliance; it is not a standard payment for injuries.
Depending on the facts and governing law, potential damages may include:
The value of a claim depends on the nature of the injuries, the evidence of the alleged defect, the medical consequences, and the applicable law.
There is no verified standard Sensio espresso maker injury settlement amount, and a settlement or jury award is not guaranteed.
TorHoerman Law’s personal injury damages guide discusses how economic and non-economic losses may be evaluated.
TorHoerman Law is reviewing potential product liability claims involving Bella Pro Series and Cooks Steam Espresso Makers recalled by Sensio.
Victims of burn injuries or lacerations deserve an individual evaluation of their legal options, rather than a promise of compensation based solely on a recall.
Our law firm evaluates the product involved, the circumstances of the accident, recall records, available evidence, and the financial and medical effects of the injury.
An investigation may address whether the brew-cup assembly, warnings, or product design contributed to a preventable injury.
Where the evidence supports a claim, injured consumers may choose to fight for compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and lasting harm.
If you or a loved one suffered burns, cuts, or lacerations after a recalled Bella Pro Series or Cooks espresso machine malfunctioned, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to request a free case review.
The March 20, 2025, Sensio recall covers the Bella Pro Series Steam Espresso Maker, model 90195, and Cooks Steam Espresso Maker, model 22395.
The machines are black with stainless-steel trim, and the model number appears as the Item number on a sticker underneath the base.
Sensio received 18 reports of brew-cup handles ejecting, including eight reports involving burns and/or lacerations.
The public CPSC notice does not describe the severity of each reported injury.
Sensio’s recall program offers a $50 check or $50 eligible retailer electronic gift card after the required verification process.
The official Sensio recall webpage explains how to apply and states that Best Buy and JCPenney stores do not process the refunds directly.
An injured consumer should consider preserving the appliance and consulting an attorney before completing steps that involve altering or disposing of it.
Accepting a refund does not necessarily prevent a separate injury claim, but the refund program’s terms and applicable state law should be reviewed.
A potential injury case still requires evidence of a legally actionable defect or other basis for liability and resulting harm.
No.
The espresso maker recall announced in March 2025 covers models 90195 and 22395 because of the risk of a handle ejecting and shattering a glass carafe.
On August 10, 2023, Sensio recalled approximately 860,000 Bella, Bella Pro Series, Cooks, and Crux electric and stovetop pressure cookers because their lids could unlock during use.
The CPSC documented 63 reported incidents, including 61 burn injuries, in that separate recall.
The products and alleged failures should not be confused when investigating an injury.
Other manufacturers have recalled coffee makers for unexpected releases of hot liquid or pressure, but those recalls do not establish that Bella Pro Series or Cooks espresso machines share the same defect.
Notable coffee maker recalls include:
These historical recalls involved different products and failure mechanisms, and none establishes the cause of Sensio’s brew-cup handle ejections.
The published recall provides a refund for eligible owners, not a settlement fund for injured consumers.
There is no verified standard settlement amount or injury payout schedule for these recalled espresso maker models.
An individual injury claim would depend on the incident, medical evidence, and applicable law.
Yes, although the absence of the machine may make it harder to determine whether the brew-cup handle, carafe, or another component failed.
Keep photographs, purchase records, recall messages, medical documentation, and any remaining broken parts.
An attorney can review whether the available evidence supports further investigation.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.