Active Litigation
Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits.
Active Litigation
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits.
Kidisle coffee maker injury claims concern burns allegedly caused when a recalled Kidisle KC101B coffeemaker released hot liquid or steam unexpectedly during brewing.
On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of approximately 17,600 Kidisle hot and iced coffee makers because the machines can become clogged and unexpectedly discharge hot liquid or steam.
The CPSC was aware of at least 107 reports of unexpected hot-liquid or steam releases and at least 27 reported injuries, including first- and second-degree burns requiring medical treatment.
TorHoerman Law is reviewing potential product liability claims from people injured by recalled Kidisle KC101B coffee makers and other defective coffee makers.

The KC101B can become clogged during brewing, causing a sudden release of heated liquid or steam toward someone standing near the machine.
That release can cause scald burns before the person has time to move away.
An injury investigation may examine the appliance’s design, manufacturing, safety warnings, and the circumstances of the hot-liquid release.
If you or a loved one suffered burns after a Kidisle KC101B released hot water or steam, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to request a free case evaluation.
Our law firm reviews qualifying coffee maker injury claims on a contingency-fee basis, with no attorney fees charged upfront.
The CPSC recall issued June 11, 2026, No. 26-557, concerns a clogging hazard that can cause hot liquid or steam to accumulate and escape unexpectedly during use.
The federal recall identifies these details:
The CPSC identifies Kidisle, of China, as the importer and a separate company in China as the manufacturer.
The CPSC identifies clogging as the condition that can cause hot liquid or steam to build up and discharge suddenly.
The recall does not establish which internal component, if any, failed in a particular machine.
The appliance, its operating instructions, and details of the brewing cycle may help determine how an injury occurred.
The June 2026 recall covers Kidisle KC101B hot and iced single-serve coffee makers.
The federal notice does not include other Kidisle coffee maker models.
Consumers can identify an affected machine using the following details:
Compare the model-number sticker with the official Kidisle recall notice rather than relying on the color or shape of the machine alone.
Consumers should not operate a suspected recalled machine again to check whether it develops the same malfunction.
The recalled coffee makers were sold on Amazon.com, Walmart.com, and eBay.com from June 2024 through April 2026.
They were manufactured in China and sold for approximately $49.
An online purchase history, order confirmation, or payment record may help identify a recalled machine even if its packaging is no longer available.
The CPSC reported at least 27 injuries, including first- and second-degree burns that required medical treatment, associated with the recalled KC101B machines.
The recall notice does not specify the treatment received or long-term outcomes in each reported case.
Hot coffee, water, or steam can cause burns when released toward someone standing near the machine during brewing.
Potential injuries from an unexpected release include:
Injury severity depends on the temperature of the liquid, the duration of contact, and the part of the body exposed.
Someone with significant blistering, burns to the face or hands, eye exposure, or another potentially serious injury should seek prompt medical attention.
Medical records and photographs taken during recovery can document the injury, treatment, and any lasting limitations.
The CPSC directs owners to stop using recalled Kidisle coffeemakers immediately.
Kidisle offers a full refund through a process that requires consumers to disable the machine and document the result.
Under the CPSC recall instructions, consumers requesting a refund are asked to unplug the machine, cut its power cord, write Recalled on the appliance in permanent marker, and submit a photograph showing the model number and cut cord.
The recall notice directs consumers to send the required photographs to KidisleKC101Brecall@outlook.com.
Consumers should consult the current CPSC instructions before beginning the refund procedure.
An injured consumer should preserve evidence before following instructions that require altering or destroying the appliance.
The original machine may help establish how the hot-liquid release occurred.
If you were injured, stop using the machine and consider obtaining legal advice before cutting the cord, disassembling it, returning it, or disposing of it.
Keep the appliance secured where it cannot be operated and do not attempt to recreate the malfunction.
Receiving a product refund is different from obtaining compensation for medical treatment or other losses caused by an injury.
A person injured by an unexpected hot-liquid or steam release may have a product liability claim if evidence shows that an actionable defect or inadequate warning caused the injury.
The recall and prior incident reports may be relevant, but each claim requires evidence connecting the machine to the injuries.
An attorney may consider:
An injured consumer does not need to identify the precise defect before requesting a legal assessment.
Simply owning a recalled KC101B does not qualify someone for personal injury compensation.
The CPSC lists Kidisle as the importer and identifies a separate China-based manufacturer.
Depending on state law, the evidence may support claims involving an importer, manufacturer, distributor, or seller.
Potential legal theories include design defects, manufacturing defects, and inadequate warnings, depending on what the evidence establishes.
The machine, instructions, and circumstances of the incident may help identify any legally responsible parties.
The original machine may be important physical evidence because Kidisle’s recall remedy requires owners to disable it.
Photographs and medical records can help document the malfunction and injuries.
Useful evidence may include:
A written account of which brewing setting was selected and what happened immediately before the release may also be useful.
Do not continue operating the recalled machine to capture additional photographs or video of the malfunction.
If liability is established, an injured person may seek financial compensation for medical treatment, lost income, and other losses.
Available damages depend on the injury, its lasting effects, and applicable state law.
Potential compensation may include:
The product refund is separate from compensation for burn injuries.
There is no verified standard settlement amount for Kidisle KC101B injuries, and compensation is not guaranteed.
TorHoerman Law is reviewing potential injury claims involving Kidisle KC101B coffee makers recalled because of unexpected releases of hot liquid or steam.
Our law firm can review the product, incident circumstances, medical records, and other available evidence to assess whether a product liability claim may be available.
If you or a loved one suffered serious burn injuries when a Kidisle KC101B unexpectedly released hot liquid or steam, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to describe what happened and request a free case review.
Yes.
On June 11, 2026, the CPSC recalled approximately 17,600 Kidisle KC101B hot and iced coffee makers because they can become clogged and unexpectedly release hot liquid or steam.
The agency was aware of at least 107 incidents and at least 27 injuries when it announced the recall.
Check the sticker on the underside of the coffee maker for model number KC101B.
The affected model has black, white, and gray coloring, a 50-ounce detachable water reservoir, and an approximately 11-inch-tall body.
Compare the model number with the official CPSC recall notice rather than relying only on the product’s appearance.
The CPSC directs consumers to stop using the machine and contact Kidisle for a full refund.
The recall procedure requires owners to unplug the machine, cut its power cord, mark it Recalled, and send photographs of the disabled unit showing the model number and cut cord to the designated recall email address.
If an injury occurred, consider obtaining legal advice before altering or destroying the appliance because it may contain important evidence.
The federal recall provides a product refund, not a court-administered settlement for injuries.
The recall does not create an injury settlement program or establish a certified class action involving the KC101B.
Someone who suffered burns can seek an evaluation of an individual claim.
You can still request a legal review, although the absence of the original appliance may make it harder to determine how the malfunction occurred.
Save any purchase records, photographs, manufacturer communications, medical documentation, and witness information that remain available.
The filing deadline depends on the state law governing the claim, when the injury occurred, and any applicable discovery or repose rules.
The June 2026 recall did not establish one national deadline for everyone injured by a Kidisle coffee maker.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Coffee Maker Injury Lawsuits pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.