If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
The Ozempic lawsuit centers on allegations that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about serious risks associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 medications.
Plaintiffs allege the drug has been linked to severe gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis, as well as vision loss and other complications that have disrupted patients’ health, nutrition, employment, and daily functioning.
If you or a loved one developed gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, severe vomiting, vision loss, or other serious complications after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication, you may have legal options.
Dupixent lawsuits allege that patients treated with dupilumab therapy later developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can closely resemble severe eczema.
Research and published case reports have raised questions about whether some patients with atopic dermatitis face a higher risk of developing CTCL compared to similar patients who did not receive the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn patients and physicians about the possibility that Dupixent could worsen, accelerate, or reveal previously undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
If you or a loved one has suffered a severe reaction or blood cancer linked to Dupixent, you may be eligible to take action and file a Dupixent lawsuit.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
Legal claims against manufacturers and distributors of generic Acetaminophen have been investigated on behalf of pregnant women who used Tylenol during pregnancy and children who developed disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, and more.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims allege that these devices are defectively designed and improperly marketed without adequate warnings, leading to severe injuries for patients.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving spinal cord stimulators that allegedly caused serious injury instead of the relief patients were led to expect.
If you or a loved one experienced complications following spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to pursue compensation through a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Roblox lawsuit claims center on allegations that the platform allowed predators to groom, exploit, and abuse children through unsafe design and inadequate protections.
TorHoerman Law is dedicated to helping families who believe their child was harmed on Roblox pursue justice and financial recovery.
For many families, legal action represents both a path to compensation and a way to demand systemic change in how Roblox treats the safety of its youngest players.
If your child was sexually abused, exploited, or exposed to harmful content through Roblox, you may be eligible to take legal action by filing a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Olympus Scope lawsuit claims center on allegations that certain reusable Olympus endoscopes and related accessories exposed patients to dangerous bacterial contamination after medical procedures.
These infections can lead to hospitalization, IV antibiotic treatment, sepsis, organ failure, and death, leaving many patients with serious medical complications and lasting physical harm.
You may qualify to file an Olympus scope lawsuit if you underwent an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure involving Olympus equipment and later developed a serious bacterial infection.
Families who lost a loved one after infection-related complications linked to an Olympus scope procedure may also be able to pursue a wrongful death claim.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Breast mesh lawsuits involve allegations that certain mesh products used during breast reconstruction, augmentation, and lift procedures contributed to postoperative complications and the need for revision surgeries.
Patients who experienced complications after mesh-assisted breast procedures have reported chronic pain, reconstruction problems, cosmetic deformities, and additional revision surgeries.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications after breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra technique, you may be eligible to pursue a breast mesh lawsuit claim for the harm caused.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit claims that defective implantable ports have caused patients to suffer dangerous fractures, blood clots, and infections due to the breakdown of the catheter’s material inside the body.
These failures can lead to life-threatening complications such as embolism, sepsis, or the need for surgical removal of the device.
If you or a loved one experienced severe complications such as blood clots, infections, or catheter fractures requiring surgery due to a defective AngioDynamics port catheter, you may be eligible to file an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit and seek compensation.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Nitrous oxide lawsuit claims center on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who profit from selling canisters that are widely misused as a recreational drug.
Reports link this misuse to severe neurological injuries, psychiatric symptoms, hypoxia, and deaths caused by accidents or overdose.
These cases are rapidly expanding as more evidence emerges of the profound physical, psychological, and social toll caused by nitrous oxide misuse.
If you or a loved one has suffered brain injuries, spinal cord or nerve damage, psychiatric symptoms, or even death linked to misused nitrous oxide, you may be eligible to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit claim and seek compensation for the harm caused.
Diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit claims center on allegations that repeated inhalation of butter-flavoring chemicals in certain workplaces, including diacetyl and related substitutes, caused permanent and preventable airway damage.
Popcorn lung, medically known as bronchiolitis obliterans or constrictive bronchiolitis, is a serious obstructive lung disease that scars and narrows the small airways, leaving many people with persistent shortness of breath, chronic cough, and reduced exercise tolerance.
TorHoerman Law has experience handling diacetyl popcorn lung cases and is currently reviewing claims from workers who believe occupational exposure to these flavoring chemicals contributed to their diagnosis.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with diacetyl induced lung disease or bronchiolitis obliterans, you may have grounds to pursue a diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit for the harm caused to your lung tissue and long-term lung function.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit.
Defendants
Instant Brands / Instant Pot
SharkNinja / Ninja Foodi
Sunbeam Products / Crock-Pot
Newell Brands
Walmart / Farberware
Sensio / Bella
NuWave
Other pressure cooker manufacturers, distributors, and retailers
Injuries named in lawsuit
First-, second-, and third-degree burns
Severe scalding injuries
Permanent scarring and disfigurement
Eye injuries or vision damage
Nerve damage
Skin grafts or reconstructive surgery
Lacerations or fractures
Psychological trauma
You may qualify to file a claim if...
A pressure cooker exploded, unexpectedly opened, or released scalding food, liquid, or steam while you were using it.
You suffered serious burns, scarring, eye injuries, nerve damage, or another significant physical injury.
Your injuries required emergency care, hospitalization, burn treatment, wound care, skin grafting, reconstructive surgery, or other significant medical treatment.
Most Recent Updates
A class action lawsuit has been initiated against Best Buy due to allegations regarding certain Insignia Pressure cookers, citing that incorrect volume markings could cause overfilling and result in hot foods and liquids being ejected.
While not involved in class actions for pressure cooker defects, the law firm is actively seeking clients who have incurred injuries from exploding pressure cookers, highlighting the distinct approach of pursuing individual personal injury lawsuits for compensation.
Plaintiffs in Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits may seek compensation for various damages including medical expenses and pain and suffering, requiring a demonstration of a direct link between the product's defect or negligence and their injuries, differentiating these cases from class action lawsuits.
Pressure Cooker Recall Guide
Question: What Pressure Cookers Are Recalled?
Recent pressure cooker recall warnings published by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) include, but are not limited to, brands such as:
Best Buy/Insignia
Insignia Multi Function Pressure Cookers
Sensio
Producer of Bella, Crux, and Cooks
Crock-Pot
Nutrex
Gem
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of recent Pressure Cooker Recall notices, what pressure cookers are recalled, recalled pressure cookers linked to explosions and injuries, how victims can seek justice through a pressure cooker explosion lawsuit, and much more.
Recalled Pressure Cookers: Risks of Explosions, Severe Burns, and Other Pressure Cooker Injuries
Pressure cookers have become indispensable for many households.
With their ability to significantly reduce cooking time, electric pressure cookers — including popular brands like the InstaPot (Instant Pot) — have revolutionized meal preparation.
However, the convenience pressure cookers offer comes with potential risks.
Reports of pressure cooker explosions are on the rise, with severe burn injuries being the most common type of injury reported.
Injury reports have led to several pressure cooker recalls over the years.
If you or a loved one has been injured due to an exploding pressure cooker, you may be entitled to compensation.
In recent years, electric pressure cookers have gained widespread popularity due to their ability to streamline the cooking process.
From household kitchens to professional restaurants, pressure cookers have become a must-have appliance for many who want their meals cooked quickly, efficiently, and with minimal effort.
The growing trend of healthy cooking is also responsible for the popularity of pressure cookers.
Many claim that pressure cooking can retain more nutrients during cooking than traditional methods.
With the increasing demand for healthier meal options, it is no surprise that pressure cookers have become a staple in many kitchens.
This rise in demand has led to the production of various models and brands, offering consumers a wide range of options to choose from.
However, this surge also means more pressure cookers are on the market, increasing the potential for defects and malfunctions.
As a result, the number of reports of pressure cooker injuries has also increased.
Reports of injuries and explosions have prompted manufacturers to issue recalls to address safety concerns and prevent further injuries.
If you have been injured by a pressure cooker explosion, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact our lawyers today to find out if you qualify to file a Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit.
The CPSC has issued many pressure cooker recalls for various reasons, primarily the potential risks of explosions, severe burns, and other injuries.
The most common reasons behind pressure cooker recalls include:
Design defects
Manufacturing defects
Inadequate safety features
Failure to warn consumers
Misleading or false advertising
Design Defects
Design defects refer to flaws in the initial design of a product that make it unsafe for consumers.
These defects may be related to the sealing mechanism, materials used, safety features, or overall design for pressure cookers.
The manufacturer is legally responsible for identifying and addressing these defects before releasing the product.
However, if a design defect goes undetected, it can lead to product malfunctions and potentially cause harm to consumers.
Manufacturing Defects
Manufacturing defects occur during the production or assembly of a product, creating a defective product that differs from its intended design.
These defects can range from minor issues to major safety hazards, including:
Faulty gaskets and seals
Defective pressure regulator
Defective steam release valve
Flimsy handles or lids
Incorrect volume markings
Faulty wiring or electrical components
If a pressure cooker gets recalled due to manufacturing defects, the issue was not present in the original design but arose during production.
Manufacturing defects can compromise the safety and performance of the product, putting consumers at risk of injuries.
Unfortunately, quality control inspections may not catch every defect before the product gets shipped to stores.
Inadequate Safety Features
Pressure cookers are designed to contain high pressure and heat, making them potentially dangerous if not used correctly.
Various safety features, such as locking lids, steam release valves, and overpressure plugs, aim to reduce accidents and prevent explosions.
However, inadequate safety features in a pressure cooker can increase the risk of explosions or other accidents.
Manufacturers are legally responsible for ensuring their products have sufficient safety features to protect consumers.
Failure To Warn Consumers
Manufacturers must warn consumers about potential hazards or risks associated with using their products.
Companies must provide proper instructions and warnings on how to use the product safely.
Failure to provide adequate warnings can result in serious injuries, especially with pressure cookers that require specific knowledge and techniques to operate safely.
If a manufacturer fails to warn consumers about potential risks, they may be liable for any resulting injuries.
Misleading or False Advertising
Misleading or false advertising claims can also lead to pressure cooker recalls.
Manufacturers must accurately represent their products and provide truthful information about their features, safety, and performance.
If a company makes false or misleading claims about its pressure cookers, it may be subject to product recalls and legal action from the consumers that these deceptive practices have harmed.
As of 2024, several notable pressure cooker recalls have garnered public attention.
Consumers must stay informed about these recalls to mitigate the risks of using a defective pressure cooker.
Recent pressure cooker recall warnings published by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) include brands such as:
Best Buy/Insignia
Insignia Multi Function Pressure Cookers
Sensio
Producer of Bella, Crux, and Cooks
Crock-Pot
Nutrex
Gem
October 2023: Best Buy Recalls Insignia Pressure Cookers
On October 26, 2023, Best Buy issued a pressure cooker recall for approximately 930,000 units of its Insignia pressure cookers.
The batch of recalled pressure cookers, sold at Best Buy stores nationwide, had incorrect volume markings on their inner pots, posing a burn hazard to consumers.
Users may overfill the inner pot, causing hot food or liquid to spew out of the cooker upon pressure release.
Among the 31 incident reports Best Buy received, 17 cases involved severe burn injuries, including first- and second-degree burns.
The company recalled Insignia Multi-Function Pressure Cookers with the following model numbers:
NS-MC60SS8
NS-MC60SS9
NS-MC80SS9
The company also included replacement inner cooker pots with the model numbers:
NS-MCRP6NS9
NS-MCRP6SS9
Best Buy advised customers to stop using the recalled pressure cookers and contact the Best Buy toll free number for a free replacement of the floating locking valve and inner pot.
August 2023: Bella, Crux, and Cooks Pressure Cookers
Pressure cookers produced by Sensio were recalled due to defects present in the cookers’ lids, which could unlock and detach during use without warning, risking burn injuries and other dangerous accidents.
Out of the 63 reports Sensio received, 61 involved burn injuries, including second-degree and third-degree burns to the face, arms, hands, and torso.
On August 10, 2023, the company recalled the following electric pressure cookers and their model numbers:
Bella: 14467, 14570, 14595, 14682, 14710, 14718, 14719, and 14780
Bella Pro Series: 90072 and 90073
Crux: 14721
Cooks: 22276
The company also recalled several Bella stovetop pressure cooker units with the model numbers JY-PC20US-5P, JY-PC24US-8P, and JY-PC26US-11P.
Approximately 860,000 units of these products posed a burn hazard to users.
As a remedy, Sensio offered customers a refund for their affected pressure cookers and advised them to stop using them immediately.
November 2020: Crock-Pot Multi-Cookers
On November 24, 2020, Sunbeam Products issued a recall for approximately 914,430 Crock-Pot Multi-Cookers, plus 28,330 units sold in Canada.
Sunbeam Products received 119 reports of detaching lids, including 99 cases of burn injuries ranging from first-degree to third-degree burns.
The recall involves Crock-Pot 6-Quart Express Crock Multi-Cookers with the model number SCCPPC600-V1.
When used in pressure cooker mode, the pressure cooker’s lid may not be fully locked into place, causing the lid to detach and release hot food or liquid.
Sunbeam Products urged customers to stop using the recalled pressure cookers in pressure cooker mode and to contact the company for a free replacement lid.
August 2018: Nutrex Pressure Cookers
Rena Ware recalled around 700 units of the Nutrex pressure cookers on August 2, 2018.
Nutrex pressure cookers with model number 2153 can expel steam lower than the intended pressure, posing a burn hazard to consumers.
The company received 13 incident reports of the products depressurizing abruptly, resulting in five cases of burn injuries.
Rena Ware advised customers to immediately stop using these pressure cookers and contact them for a free repair.
March 2018: Gem Multi-Cookers
After receiving 107 reports of overheating, including five cases of minor property damage, Double Insight recalled about 104,000 Gem 65 8-in-1 multi-cookers on March 1, 2018.
These units have “Instant Pot” printed on the front and have batch codes of 1728, 1730, 1731, 1734, and 1746.
Because of a manufacturing defect, the multi-cooker can overheat and melt on its underside, posing a fire hazard.
Double Insight advised customers to immediately stop using the recalled pressure cookers and contact them for a free replacement.
Additionally, consumers who purchased the pressure cookers from Walmart should return the product to the store for a full refund.
Other Past Pressure Cooker Recalls
Although pressure cookers have risen in popularity in recent years, these products have historically posed risks of injury.
Learning from past incidents can increase consumer awareness and highlight the importance of promptly addressing safety concerns.
Other past pressure cooker recall warnings include:
December 22, 2015: Breville USA recalled around 35,600 Breville Fast Slow Cooker units with the model number BPR600XL and batch numbers from 1235 to 1529. The company received five reports of the products expelling steam or hot contents and causing second-degree burns to the arms, hands, or stomach. The sealing gaskets were incorrectly installed upside-down, potentially allowing a sudden pressure release.
July 15, 2015: After three reports of electric shock, Double Insight recalled around 1,000 units of Instant Pot pressure cookers, plus 140 units sold in Canada. The Instant Pot recall involved Instant Pot “Smart” and “Smart-60” electric pressure cookers with serial numbers 1410 to 1503 and manufactured from December 1, 2014, to June 1, 2015. According to the InstaPot recall, the thermal probe in the base could conduct electricity and allow current to flow to the exterior of the cooker, posing a shock hazard.
December 21, 2007: Importer Manttra Inc. recalled around 38,250 Manttra Smart Series pressure cooker unitswith model number 38270. The company received two incident reports of hot contents spilling out of the pressure cooker due to the lid, causing minor burn injuries.
February 8, 2007: Retailer HSN LP (formerly Home Shopping Network) recalled approximately 8,300 Bella Cucina “Zip Cooker” Low-pressure Cookers with model number 03908. According to seven reports, the pressure on the units caused hot food to eject, leading to eight cases of first-, second-, and third-degree burns.
November 30, 2006: Before the Bella Cucina recall, HSN LP recalled roughly 1,450 units of the Ultrex-brand pressure cookers with model number 11453. Two reports of second- and third-degree burns to the upper arm stated that the pressure cooker’s lid opened while it was still under pressure.
June 14, 2006: Retailer QVC Inc. recalled around 900 Welbilt electronic pressure cookers with model number PC501. While there were no consumer incident reports, 43 failure incident reports from another retailer recorded 37 cases of burn injuries.
June 3, 2005: Before the 2006 Wellbit recall, HSN LP recalled around 3,900 Welbilt electronic pressure cookers with model number PC501. The distributor based the recall on the same 43 failure incident reports.
For consumers concerned about the safety of their pressure cookers, identifying whether their appliance is part of a recall is vital.
Manufacturers typically provide detailed information on their official websites, including lists of affected models and instructions on checking for recalls.
Look for the model number on your pressure cooker, which you can find on the label on the bottom or side of the appliance.
If your model number matches any of those listed in a recall, stop using the pressure cooker immediately and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for returning or repairing the product.
If you experience any issues or have concerns about your pressure cooker, contact the manufacturer for further assistance.
Additionally, relevant authorities, such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), issue recall announcements and information on their websites.
If you have suffered injuries or burns due to a recalled pressure cooker, you may also be eligible to file a product liability lawsuit.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.
Injured by a Pressure Cooker Explosion? You Have Legal Rights
Various pressure cooker recalls from past years reveal a concerning pattern of incidents related to explosions and severe burn injuries.
The defects often involve critical components such as the pressure cooker’s lid, steam release valve, or inner pot.
Understanding these patterns is crucial for consumers to make informed decisions about their kitchen appliances and prioritize safety in the cooking process.
Knowing that pressure cookers explode due to safety defects and understanding the severity of associated injuries can both help prevent future incidents.
Because of numerous cases where a user reported that their pressure cooker exploded, many manufacturers and brands — such as Instant Pot (InstaPot) and Crock-Pot — have faced legal action and paid out significant settlements to injured victims.
Interestingly, some brands like the Tristar power pressure cooker have not experienced recalls, yet many owners have reported incidents of pressure cooker explosions and injuries.
Even if your pressure cooker has not been recalled, you still may be eligible to file a lawsuit if you have been injured.
Contact our law firm to learn more.
Legal Implications of Pressure Cooker Recalls
The aftermath of pressure cooker recalls often involves legal proceedings, with affected individuals seeking compensation for injuries caused by defective pressure cookers.
Pressure cooker lawsuits are pivotal in holding manufacturers, distributors, and retailers accountable.
Individuals who have suffered burns, injuries, or other damages due to a faulty pressure cooker may be entitled to compensation.
These lawsuits typically allege negligence, design defects, or failure to warn consumers about potential risks associated with the product.
Legal recourse is crucial for affected individuals seeking justice and compensation for injuries caused by defective pressure cookers.
In addition to providing financial restitution, these lawsuits send a powerful message to manufacturers, urging them to prioritize the safety of their products.
Pressure cooker owners must take proactive steps to ensure their safety and that of their loved ones while using the appliance.
Consumer guidance when it comes to recalled or defective pressure cookers includes:
Following Recall Instructions: If you discover that your pressure cooker is part of a recall, follow the manufacturer’s instructions explicitly. Manufacturers typically provide detailed steps to return or replace the defective product.
Discontinuing Use of Recalled Products: Stop using the recalled pressure cooker immediately to ensure safety. Avoid using it until the manufacturer offers a replacement or repair service.
Seeking Legal Consultation: If your pressure cooker explodes or causes injuries, consult an experienced lawyer specializing in product liability. A knowledgeable attorney can evaluate your case and help you understand your legal rights.
While manufacturers are responsible for ensuring the safety of their products, consumers must also prioritize safe usage.
Maintaining pressure cookers according to the manufacturer’s instructions can prevent incidents and injuries.
TorHoerman Law: Your Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawyer
While pressure cookers offer convenience and time-saving benefits, their potential for causing severe burns and injuries is a cause of concern.
If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to a defective pressure cooker, TorHoerman Law can help you seek justice and compensation.
Our expert lawyers specialize in product liability cases and are committed to protecting your legal rights.
Contact us today for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the pressure cooker lawsuit instantly.
If you have been injured by a pressure cooker or instant pot explosion, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact our law firm today for a free case consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Pressure Cooker Recall Lawsuit instantly.
Pressure cooker recalls are typically initiated due to safety concerns such as faulty sealing rings, lid-locking mechanisms, or other defects that could lead to explosions or burns.
Certain defects might cause the cooker to open under pressure, lead to unexpected steam release, or malfunction in a way that poses a risk to users.
Recalls are often announced after reports of accidents or upon discovery of potential hazards during quality checks.
Pressure cooker explosions usually occur due to a failure in the pressure regulation system or a malfunctioning seal.
Pressure cookers work by trapping steam inside, which raises the internal pressure and temperature.
If the pressure isn’t properly regulated or if the lid is improperly sealed or opens while the contents are under high pressure, it can cause the hot contents to be forcefully ejected.
Overfilling the cooker or improper maintenance can also lead to explosions.
Pressure cooker lawsuits are generally filed under product liability, alleging that the cooker had a design or manufacturing defect or lacked proper warnings.
Plaintiffs may seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and punitive damages in some cases.
The outcomes of these lawsuits vary, with some resulting in settlements or jury awards, depending on the specifics of each case.
It’s important for potential plaintiffs to consult with a legal expert to understand the viability of their case.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
Legally Reviewed
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
Fact-Checked
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
Additional Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit resources on our website:
Other pressure cooker manufacturers, distributors, and retailers
Show 2 more
Injuries named in lawsuit
First-, second-, and third-degree burns
Severe scalding injuries
Permanent scarring and disfigurement
Eye injuries or vision damage
Nerve damage
Skin grafts or reconstructive surgery
Lacerations or fractures
Psychological trauma
Show 2 more
You may qualify to file a claim if...
A pressure cooker exploded, unexpectedly opened, or released scalding food, liquid, or steam while you were using it.
You suffered serious burns, scarring, eye injuries, nerve damage, or another significant physical injury.
Your injuries required emergency care, hospitalization, burn treatment, wound care, skin grafting, reconstructive surgery, or other significant medical treatment.
Most Recent Updates
A class action lawsuit has been initiated against Best Buy due to allegations regarding certain Insignia Pressure cookers, citing that incorrect volume markings could cause overfilling and result in hot foods and liquids being ejected.
While not involved in class actions for pressure cooker defects, the law firm is actively seeking clients who have incurred injuries from exploding pressure cookers, highlighting the distinct approach of pursuing individual personal injury lawsuits for compensation.
Plaintiffs in Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits may seek compensation for various damages including medical expenses and pain and suffering, requiring a demonstration of a direct link between the product's defect or negligence and their injuries, differentiating these cases from class action lawsuits.
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.