Active LitigationMDL 3026
Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
Active Litigation·MDL 3026
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
Infant Formula Short Bowel Syndrome Lawsuit claims allege that infant formula manufacturers failed to warn parents about the increased health risks linked to their products when consumed by preterm infants and low-birth weight babies.
Our NEC Baby Formula Lawyers are currently accepting new clients with claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Infant Formula Short Bowel Syndrome Lawsuit, developments in the NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits, health risks linked to cow’s milk based formula, how NEC Baby Formula Lawyers can help, and much more.
Infant Formula Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) Lawsuits address the severe impact that cow’s milk-based formulas, like Similac and Enfamil, may have on premature infants.
Research shows that preterm babies given these formulas face an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a dangerous intestinal condition that can lead to the surgical removal of significant portions of the intestine.
This surgery often results in Short Bowel Syndrome, a condition in which the body cannot properly absorb nutrients due to the reduced length of the intestine.
Families of affected infants are filing NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits, alleging that formula manufacturers did not adequately warn them of these risks.
NEC Infant Formula Lawsuits are part of a broader effort to hold manufacturers accountable for potential negligence in promoting their products as safe for preterm infants and low-birth weight babies.

Our NEC Lawyers are currently accepting new clients with NEC and short bowel syndrome claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
If your child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after receiving an Enfamil cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier and later developed short bowel syndrome, you may be eligible to file an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
Contact the NEC Baby Formula Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation about a potential Enfamil NEC claim.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an NEC Baby Formula Case instantly.
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) can profoundly affect a child’s health and well-being, requiring specialized nutrition, frequent hospital visits, and lifelong medical support.
The emotional toll on families is immense as they deal with the financial and logistical challenges of securing the necessary care for their child.
Our attorneys at TorHoerman Law understand the impact SBS has on families and have successfully fought for parents seeking justice for their children.
A leading NEC Baby Formula Lawyer from our firm, Jake Plattenberger, secured a $495 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories on behalf of a child who developed NEC after being fed cow’s milk formula in the NICU.
If your child has been affected, reach out to us today to discuss how we can help you pursue rightful compensation.
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) is a severe condition often resulting from surgical removal of a significant portion of the intestine, which may be necessary when infants develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
NEC primarily affects premature infants and can cause the death of intestinal tissue, often leading to urgent surgical intervention.
When a significant portion of the intestine is removed to save the infant’s life, the remaining portion may not be able to absorb sufficient nutrients, leading to Short Bowel Syndrome.
This condition results in chronic malabsorption, meaning that children with SBS face challenges in absorbing essential nutrients, fluids, and electrolytes, which can hinder their growth and development.
Children with SBS often require lifelong support, including specialized diets, IV nutrition, and, in severe cases, intestinal transplants.
The connection between NEC and SBS is critical, as cow’s milk-based formulas are linked to a heightened risk of NEC, which subsequently increases the risk of SBS following surgical treatment.
This devastating outcome can lead to a complex, costly medical journey for both the child and their family.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting NEC claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson. We are no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.

Below are some ways SBS develops and impacts a child’s life:
TorHoerman Law understands the challenges families face and is committed to supporting those affected by NEC and SBS.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious gastrointestinal disease that primarily affects premature babies, often within the first few weeks of life.
This condition occurs when the lining of the intestine becomes inflamed and begins to die, potentially leading to a life-threatening rupture of the intestinal wall.
NEC is one of the most common and dangerous conditions treated in neonatal intensive care units, where fragile premature infants are especially susceptible to infection and gastrointestinal complications.
Babies with NEC can develop symptoms like abdominal swelling, bloody stools, and feeding intolerance, which often require immediate medical intervention.
Treatment for NEC can range from antibiotics and supportive care to emergency surgery for removing damaged portions of the intestine.

Families affected by NEC often face extensive emotional and financial challenges, given the prolonged medical treatments and potential long-term health consequences.
For parents navigating this difficult journey, understanding the causes, risks, and treatments associated with NEC is crucial.
Research has shown that premature babies who are fed cow’s milk-based formula have a higher risk of developing NEC compared to those who are exclusively breastfed or given donor milk.
Studies show that infants fed cow’s milk formulas, such as Similac and Enfamil, face significantly higher rates of NEC than those receiving human milk.
Moreover, infants fed exclusively on human milk or donor milk exhibited a much lower incidence of NEC, emphasizing the protective factors in human milk that are absent in cow-based formulas.
Studies from sources like The Journal of Pediatrics and a 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics article highlight that exclusive breastfeeding or donor milk feeding could reduce NEC risks by up to 90%.
Cow’s milk-based formulas, by contrast, lack critical immune-boosting components and may exacerbate inflammation, increasing susceptibility to NEC.

Scientific Studies Indicating Increased Risk of NEC from Cow’s Milk-Based Formula:
NEC Lawsuits involving infant formulas have emerged as a significant legal challenge for manufacturers, particularly Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, makers of Similac and Enfamil baby formula, respectively.
These lawsuits, filed by families of premature infants affected by necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), claim that cow’s milk-based formulas increase the risk of NEC in vulnerable newborns.
Hundreds of NEC Lawsuits are consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), where families seek justice for the harm caused to their infants, citing product liability and failure to warn of the increased risks associated with these formulas.
The NEC Infant Formula MDL is consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Countless more NEC Lawsuits are being pursued in state courts across the country.
NEC Baby Formula Plaintiffs argue that manufacturers should have provided clear warnings or alternative feeding options for premature infants vulnerable to NEC.
NEC Formula Lawsuits also emphasize that had healthcare providers been fully informed, different feeding choices could have been made.
Enfamil and Similac Baby Formula Lawsuits highlight ongoing concerns about the safety of cow’s milk-based formulas for premature infants, with plaintiffs seeking accountability from manufacturers for the pain, suffering, and substantial medical expenses related to NEC.
Through these cases, families hope to prompt greater transparency in the industry and establish safer standards for infant formula used in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) settings.

If your premature infant developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier, you may be eligible to file an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact our NEC Baby Formula Lawyers for a free consultation.
In a landmark victory, TorHoerman Law secured a $495 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories in a trial centered on the risks associated with Similac, a popular infant formula brand.
The case was heard in St. Louis, Missouri, where the jury awarded compensatory damages of $95 million and an additional $400 million in punitive damages, underscoring the significant negligence identified in Abbott’s practices.
The plaintiff’s child, a premature baby who had been treated at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed Similac baby formula.
Evidence presented in the case highlighted the risks of cow’s milk-based formulas like Similac infant formula, which research has linked to a heightened risk of NEC in premature babies.
NEC Lawyers from TorHoerman Law successfully argued that Abbott Laboratories failed to adequately warn parents and healthcare providers about these known risks, despite scientific studies and internal findings.
The verdict reflects a growing awareness of product safety in neonatal care and signals the accountability that major corporations face when profit overshadows patient safety.
As a result of this verdict, our team of NEC attorneys has set a significant precedent, reinforcing the rights of families affected by NEC.

This achievement marks a critical milestone in the fight for justice for families nationwide impacted by similar tragedies.
For families and parents who have faced similar situations, TorHoerman Law’s victory provides a foundation for pursuing compensation and accountability.
NEC and Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) bring immense challenges to infants and their families, impacting every aspect of life—from the baby’s physical health to the family’s emotional and financial well-being.
Parents expect that formula products marketed for vulnerable infants are safe, and companies have a duty to clearly warn of any potential risks, including the severe complications of NEC and SBS.
TorHoerman Law represents families pursuing NEC claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson, including cases involving serious complications such as short bowel syndrome.
If your child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after receiving an Enfamil formula or fortifier and later developed short bowel syndrome, you may be eligible to file an Enfamil NEC lawsuit.
Contact the experienced NEC Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Our NEC Lawyers intimately understand these cases and recognize the devastating impact NEC can have on your child and family.
We will help you through the entire legal process, including gathering sufficient evidence and calculating related costs.
Building a strong NEC Lawsuit against baby formula manufacturers requires collecting specific and credible evidence to show the link between the formula and the risk of the infant’s diagnosis.
This evidence is essential for establishing product liability, proving the use of the formula in the NICU, and detailing the medical impact on the child.
Our experienced NEC Lawyers work closely with families to gather, organize, and retain these critical pieces of evidence, which help to strengthen claims and support potential compensation.

Key types of evidence in NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits include:
Medical records, NICU feeding records, product information, treatment records, and documentation of resulting complications may provide important evidence in an Enfamil NEC claim.
In a legal context, “damages” refer to the financial compensation sought by plaintiffs to cover both the economic and emotional costs related to an injury or loss.
For families affected by NEC due to Similac or Enfamil formulas, damages aim to address the substantial financial burdens and long-term impacts of the illness on both the child and the family.
In NEC Lawsuits, potential damages cover the direct expenses of medical treatment as well as the long-term physical, emotional, and financial strain placed on families by this devastating condition.
In Enfamil NEC claims, the damages sought may depend on the severity of the child’s injuries, medical treatment, long-term care needs, and other losses associated with NEC and short bowel syndrome.

Potential damages in Similac and Enfamil Baby Formula Lawsuits include:
The damages available in an individual NEC lawsuit depend on the facts of the case, the injuries involved, and the law that applies to the claim.
TorHoerman Law represents families pursuing NEC claims involving Enfamil cow’s milk-based formulas and fortifiers manufactured by Mead Johnson.
Our experience in product liability cases, especially those involving serious health risks, allows us to bring a unique blend of empathy, commitment, and legal acumen to every case.
We understand the profound emotional and financial challenges that families endure when a child suffers from NEC and its long-term complications.
Enfamil NEC lawsuits allege that Mead Johnson failed to adequately warn about the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis associated with certain cow’s milk-based products given to premature infants.
Our law firm has experience litigating NEC baby formula claims, including a $495 million jury verdict obtained in a 2024 case involving a premature infant who developed NEC.

If your child developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil formula or fortifier in a hospital or NICU, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation and let us help you pursue justice and accountability.
Parents may be able to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit if their child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after receiving a cow’s milk-based infant formula and subsequently passed away.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting NEC wrongful death claims involving Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
Wrongful death lawsuits allow families to seek justice and accountability from the manufacturers responsible for distributing products that may have contributed to severe illness and loss of life.
In these cases, families often claim that formula companies failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential risks of NEC for premature infants, particularly with formulas commonly administered in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Through a wrongful death lawsuit, families may pursue compensation for medical expenses, funeral costs, emotional distress, and the pain and suffering associated with the loss of a child.
Each case is unique, and experienced NEC Lawyers can provide guidance on eligibility, legal options, and what to expect throughout the process.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
Families with potential Enfamil NEC wrongful death claims can contact our law firm for a free consultation.
Families have filed lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories (maker of Similac) and Mead Johnson (maker of Enfamil) due to claims that cow’s milk-based formulas marketed for premature infants increase the risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Research has shown that infants fed cow’s milk-based formulas have a higher risk of developing NEC compared to those exclusively fed human milk.
NEC Lawsuits allege that the formula manufacturers did not provide adequate warnings about the potential risks associated with their products, which are commonly administered in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to fragile preterm infants.
By pursuing these cases, families aim to hold formula companies accountable and seek compensation to cover the extensive medical costs, emotional suffering, and potential long-term care needs for their children.
The outcome of these lawsuits could also drive changes in formula marketing and warning practices for infants at risk of NEC.
In NEC and SBS Lawsuits, families may seek various forms of compensation to address both economic and non-economic damages.
The damages sought generally cover the extensive medical treatments required for NEC and SBS, including surgeries, long-term hospital stays, and nutritional therapy.
Compensation may also include the costs of lifelong medical care for complications such as short bowel syndrome, pain and suffering endured by both the infant and family, loss of quality of life, and, in tragic cases, funeral expenses.
Wrongful death lawsuits may be filed if a child passed away due to NEC, which can further encompass loss of companionship and emotional distress.
Each case is unique, so working with experienced NEC lawyers is crucial to accurately assessing and maximizing potential damages specific to each family’s experience.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.