Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit

An Alabama woman has sued the makers of NutriBullet, alleging her blending cup violently separated from its base during normal use, exposing her hand to the still-spinning blades.

She filed the complaint on August 5, later removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama on September 4.

She was using her NutriBullet 900 Series blender on August 15, 2025, when the cylinder detached and the exposed blades struck her hand, causing a seven-centimeter laceration.

She alleges the blender lacked an interlock mechanism that should automatically cut power to the blades the moment the cylinder loosens or separates from the base, a safety feature she says was defectively absent from the design.

She required emergency care, orthopedic surgery, scar revision, and extensive physical therapy, and says she now has permanent nerve damage, weakness, and functional impairment in her hand.

Her suit alleges the manufacturers knew about a well-documented history of similar incidents but failed to warn consumers or redesign the product.

She brings claims including violation of Alabama’s product liability doctrine, negligence, and wantonness, seeking damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and permanent disfigurement.

A Michigan woman has sued Sunbeam Products and Newell Brands, alleging her Crock-Pot Express Crock Multicooker exploded while still pressurized during normal use. 

She filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on September 2nd. 

She alleges the lid opened despite the appliance being pressurized on September 18, 2024, ejecting scalding food and liquid onto her body and causing serious burns.

She claims Sunbeam marketed the cooker as equipped with sensors and safeguards designed to prevent the lid from opening under pressure, promising the lid couldn’t be removed until pressure was safely released. 

Her complaint alleges the company received more than 100 prior reports of Crock-Pot lid detachments and related injuries, yet continued selling the product without adequately warning consumers. 

She brings claims including strict liability, negligence, and breach of implied warranty, seeking compensation for her injuries and medical expenses.

A Louisiana man has filed suit alleging a defective Ninja Foodi air fryer ignited and caused a kitchen fire that damaged his home and injured him.

The complaint was filed in Louisiana state court on July 21 against SharkNinja Management LLC, and was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on August 28.

The plaintiff alleges he plugged his Ninja Foodi Double Air Fryer into a kitchen outlet in August 2025.

While cooking, the device spontaneously caught fire and caused extensive fire and smoke damage.

The fire also melted a water line connected to his refrigerator, creating a puddle that caused him to slip and fall, injuring his back, knees, ankle and left hand.

The complaint alleges the air fryer lacked adequate internal electrical components, wiring, thermal controls and ventilation safeguards to prevent short circuiting and overheating.

It also alleges SharkNinja failed to provide adequate warning of the defect.

The plaintiff brings claims under the Louisiana Products Liability Act and seeks damages covering medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages and property damage.

An Iowa man has sued Metal Ware Corporation, the maker of Nesco cookers, alleging his device became dangerously pressurized even though he wasn’t using the pressure-cooking function. 

He filed the complaint in Iowa District Court on August 5, and the case was later removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 

He alleges the cooker was defectively designed and inadequately labeled to warn users about residual internal pressure.

According to the complaint, he placed tomatoes in the cooker overnight in October 2024 using only the “Slow Cook” setting. 

The next morning, he stirred the tomatoes, replaced the lid, and selected “Slow Cook” again. 

At some point afterward, the device allegedly became pressurized without any warning to him. 

When he later opened it, the lid blew off, spraying boiling tomato juice and the cooker’s contents across his kitchen and onto his body, causing serious burns.

He alleges the company knew or should have known the cooker could be defective and unreasonably dangerous even during normal use. 

His suit brings claims of negligence, strict liability, and failure to warn, seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and lost income.

A Virginia woman has sued Corelle Brands and several related Instant Pot corporate entities, alleging a design defect allowed the lid to be removed before internal steam and pressure had fully released.

She was using an Instant Pot Programmable Electric Pressure Cooker Model DUO 60, a Mickey Mouse Classic edition, in February 2022.

After the cook cycle finished and she released the steam, she began rotating the handle to open the lid when it suddenly blew off entirely.

Scalding steam, liquid, and hot food discharged onto her body with significant force.

She suffered serious, disfiguring burns to her breasts and abdomen that resulted in permanent scarring.

Her complaint alleges Instant Pot’s manufacturers advertised specific safety features meant to prevent exactly this kind of lid failure, but that those features are defectively designed and prone to failing.

She further alleges the companies have received numerous consumer complaints and independent reports of similar incidents over time, yet chose not to redesign the product to address the underlying defect, prioritizing profit over consumer safety.

The suit brings claims including strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, failure to warn, and both design and manufacturing defect, seeking compensation for her pain, suffering, disability, and permanent disfigurement.

Two Connecticut women filed separate suits against Cuisinart and parent company Conair in state court this week.

One plaintiff’s suit involves the CPC-600 model, and the other involves the EPC-1200 model, with both making nearly identical claims.

Both women suffered serious burns when their pressure cookers exploded, with one incident occurring in September 2024, the other in December 2024.

Both say they were using the devices as instructed.

The complaints allege the products’ instruction booklets promised the lid would “double-lock” and stay shut under pressure.

Despite this, both women say the lids rotated and opened under normal force, allowing hot, pressurized food to explode onto them.

The suits raise claims including strict liability, negligent design defect, and failure to warn.

Both cases are pending in the Stamford Judicial District of Connecticut Superior Court.

A California man has sued SharkNinja Operating LLC over a Ninja Foodi TenderCrisp Pressure Cooker explosion. 

He filed the complaint August 11 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. 

He alleges the lid blew off while dangerous pressure remained inside, despite manual claims it would stay locked until fully depressurized. 

Scalding liquid, food, and steam sprayed across his hands, chest, and arms. 

He suffered severe burns requiring medical treatment. He claims SharkNinja knew of the defect from other similar explosion incidents. 

He alleges the company continued selling the devices without an adequate warning or recall. 

The suit alleges strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty, seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and permanent injuries.

The makers of Crock-Pot pressure cookers reached a confidential settlement resolving claims from a mother whose daughter was severely burned.

In this case, the plaintiff alleged that a Crock-Pot Express Multicooker exploded in October 2019, dousing a child with scalding liquid and steam.

She suffered permanent facial disfigurement as a result.

Sunbeam recalled the product about a year later, warning the lid could detach unexpectedly.

The case had gone to trial in late May alongside two other plaintiffs, whose cases remain unresolved.

A court-appointed guardian reviewed the settlement given the minor involved and found it fair.

A plaintiff is asking a Florida federal court to approve a confidential settlement with Sunbeam Products and parent company Newell Brands, reaching the deal in the middle of trial. 

The plaintiff’s daughter suffered severe facial burns after their Crock-Pot electric pressure cooker allegedly exploded in October 2019, with the lid detaching and scalding contents landing on the child. 

Because the settlement involves a minor, Florida law requires court approval before it can take effect.

The case was one of three lawsuits alleging Sunbeam and Newell Brands continued selling defective pressure cookers with a faulty lid-locking mechanism despite inadequate warnings to consumers. 

The three suits were consolidated in March before a Southern District of Florida judge. 

There’s no indication the other two plaintiffs have reached similar deals with the companies.

The settlement adds to a broader pattern of pressure cooker litigation this year, including separate suits against Instant Pot over similar lid-failure and scalding allegations.

A new lawsuit has been filed against Instant Brands in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging her Instant Pot Duo Nova 60 ejected scalding contents while still pressurized.

The plaintiff alleges the incident occurred July 18, 2021, causing serious burns despite the product’s advertised “10 safety features” designed to prevent the lid from opening under pressure.

The lawsuit claims Instant Brands knew of the defect but continued selling the product without redesigning it.

The suit brings claims of strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty, seeking compensatory and punitive damages.

The case joins a growing number of pressure cooker lawsuits against Instant Pot, Ninja, and Crock-Pot, including a separate Instant Pot suit filed by an Alabama woman earlier this month.

A lawsuit has been filed against Gourmia and The Steelstone Group in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging a Gourmia 6-in-1 K-Cup Coffee Maker malfunctioned and sprayed scalding water onto a consumer’s arm.

The complaint was filed on July 21, alleging that while brewing coffee on July 23, 2024, the machine made a strange sound, failed to dispense liquid as expected, then violently sprayed hot contents onto her forearm, causing second-degree burns that left her with permanent scarring and ongoing wound care needs.

The suit alleges Gourmia failed to adequately test the device before selling it and provided no warnings about the risk of scalding injury during normal use.

It brings claims of strict product liability, negligence, and breach of implied warranty.

The case follows similar suits against Nostalgia and Brentwood Appliances over single-serve coffee makers that allegedly exploded or ejected scalding water.

These lawsuits are part of a broader wave of defective kitchen appliance litigation that includes ongoing pressure cooker cases against Gourmia, Instant Pot, SharkNinja, and Farberware.

An Alabama woman has sued Instant Pot Brands and related entities, including IB Appliances US Holdings LLC and Instant Brands LLC, alleging a defective safety system let her pressure cooker’s lid blow off while still pressurized. 

The plaintiff filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court of Illinois on July 9, claiming her Instant Pot Duo Nova 60 ejected scalding contents on August 3, 2023, despite showing no signs that pressure remained inside.

The plaintiff alleges the company’s marketed “11 safety mechanisms,” meant to keep the lid locked until pressure fully releases, can fail and expose users to serious burns. 

She claims Instant Pot knew about the defect and continued selling the product without a recall, prioritizing profit over consumer safety. 

Her claims include strict liability, negligent design defect, failure to warn, and breach of implied warranty, with damages sought for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

A West Virginia woman has filed a product liability lawsuit against Walmart over an alleged defect in a Farberware 7-in-1 Programmable Pressure Cooker.

She claims the appliance exploded because its safety features failed to prevent the lid from being opened while the cooker remained pressurized.

The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Amanda D. White, who claims she suffered severe burn injuries while using the pressure cooker in April 2024.

According to the complaint, the lid unexpectedly opened while the contents were still under pressure, causing scalding-hot food and liquid to erupt from the cooker and inflict serious burns across multiple areas of her body.

White alleges the pressure cooker was defectively designed because its lid-locking mechanism failed to keep the lid securely closed until all internal pressure had been safely released.

The lawsuit further claims Walmart knew or should have known about the alleged defect but continued to market and sell the product without providing adequate warnings to consumers.

According to the complaint, White required extensive medical treatment for partial-thickness burns, including wound debridement and ongoing care.

She alleges the injuries caused permanent scarring and disfigurement, as well as significant physical pain, emotional distress, and other long-term damages.

The lawsuit asserts claims for strict product liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and failure to warn.

White is seeking compensatory and punitive damages.

A Washington state judge has denied a motion to dismiss a product liability lawsuit against Guangdong Midea Consumer Electric Manufacturing Co., the Chinese manufacturer of an Instant Pot pressure cooker, allowing the plaintiffs to conduct discovery on whether the company has sufficient ties to Washington to be sued there.

The lawsuit was filed by New York residents Benjamin Dotson and Samantha Ginesin, who allege they suffered severe burns when a 6-quart Instant Pot pressure cooker unexpectedly ejected hot soup while they were using it in January 2023.

According to the complaint, the pressure cooker malfunctioned without warning, causing hot food to spray onto both individuals and resulting in permanent scarring and disfigurement.

Midea argued that the Washington court lacked personal jurisdiction because the company has no offices, employees, property, manufacturing facilities, or registered agent in the state and does not directly sell or distribute products there.

Amazon, where the pressure cooker was purchased as a gift, is also named as a defendant in the case.

In denying the motion, the court found that the current record was insufficient to determine whether Midea’s relationship with Amazon establishes the necessary connection to Washington.

The judge authorized jurisdictional discovery so the plaintiffs can obtain information regarding Midea’s business relationship with Amazon and whether that relationship is sufficient for the case to proceed in Washington state court.

The ruling does not address the merits of the product defect claims. Instead, it allows the parties to gather additional evidence before the court determines whether it has jurisdiction over the manufacturer.

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against Sunbeam Products Inc. and Newell Brands.

The complaint alleges that a recalled Crock-Pot Express pressure cooker caused a Kentucky couple to suffer severe burn injuries after the appliance was opened while it allegedly remained pressurized.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

According to the complaint, the plaintiffs allege they were able to open the pressure cooker’s lid even though dangerous pressure remained trapped inside.

They claim the appliance suddenly released scalding hot food and liquid, causing serious burn injuries.

The lawsuit alleges that the pressure cooker contained defective safety mechanisms.

According to the complaint, those mechanisms failed to prevent the lid from opening while the appliance remained pressurized.

The plaintiffs further allege that safer alternative designs were available and that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the alleged hazard.

The complaint also references the 2020 recall of more than 900,000 Crock-Pot Express pressure cookers, which followed reports of similar incidents involving lid detachment and burn injuries.

The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages for their injuries and other losses.

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against Walmart Inc. and Farberware.

The complaint alleges that a Farberware 7-in-1 Programmable Pressure Cooker caused a consumer to suffer burn injuries when the appliance was opened while still pressurized.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that she was able to open the lid of the pressure cooker. She claims dangerous pressure remained trapped inside the unit at the time.

The lawsuit alleges that hot contents were suddenly expelled from the appliance. The plaintiff claims the incident caused partial-thickness burns and other injuries.

The complaint further alleges that the pressure cooker contained defective safety mechanisms.

According to the lawsuit, those mechanisms failed to prevent the lid from opening while the unit remained pressurized.

The plaintiff claims that Walmart and Farberware knew or should have known about the alleged defect.

The lawsuit alleges that the companies continued to market and sell the product without adequate warnings or safety protections.

The case joins a growing number of pressure cooker injury claims filed nationwide.

Many lawsuits allege that certain pressure cookers can be opened despite the presence of internal pressure.

Plaintiffs in those cases claim that scalding hot food, liquid, and steam can escape when the lid is opened.

They allege that these incidents can result in serious burn injuries.

Similar allegations have been raised in lawsuits involving other pressure cooker brands.

Many plaintiffs claim that lid-locking and pressure-release systems failed to operate as intended.

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against NuWave LLC, alleging that a defective Nutri Pot Digital Pressure Cooker caused a consumer to suffer severe burn injuries when the appliance was opened while still pressurized.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that she was able to rotate and open the lid of a NuWave 6 Quart Nutri Pot Digital Pressure Cooker while pressure remained inside the unit.

The lawsuit claims the cooker’s contents were forcefully ejected, causing serious burn injuries that required medical treatment.

The complaint alleges that NuWave’s advertised “Sure Lock Safety System” failed to prevent the lid from opening while the cooker remained pressurized.

The plaintiff further claims that NuWave knew or should have known about the alleged defect but continued to market and sell the product without adequate warnings.

The lawsuit joins a growing number of pressure cooker injury claims filed nationwide, alleging that certain pressure cookers can be opened while still under internal pressure, resulting in the release of scalding-hot food, liquid, and steam.

Similar allegations have been raised in other lawsuits involving NuWave pressure cookers and other brands.

Litigation involving pressure cooker burn injuries continues to grow as a Texas consumer filed a lawsuit against Walmart alleging a Farberware 7-in-1 Programmable Pressure Cooker exploded while still under pressure, causing severe burns to his face, neck, chest, abdomen, and arms.

According to the complaint, the pressure cooker’s lid was able to be removed despite the presence of dangerous internal pressure, allegedly defeating the appliance’s advertised safety mechanisms that are intended to prevent opening while pressurized.

The lawsuit claims Walmart knew or should have known about similar pressure cooker incidents involving lid-lock failures and exploding contents but failed to redesign the product, issue additional warnings, or remove the device from the market.

The case joins a growing number of lawsuits involving pressure cookers sold by major manufacturers and retailers, where plaintiffs allege defective pressure-release and lid-interlock systems allowed scalding liquids and steam to escape unexpectedly.

As litigation continues nationwide, plaintiffs are increasingly focusing on whether manufacturers adequately tested these safety features and whether prior reports of similar incidents should have prompted stronger corrective action to protect consumers from catastrophic burn injuries.

A Colorado federal court has stayed enforcement of a $9 million product liability judgment against Sunbeam and Newell Brands pending appeal, while requiring the companies to post a full $10.2 million bond to secure payment.

The underlying verdict found the manufacturers liable for design defect, failure to warn, and negligence after a multicooker lid allegedly detached under pressure, causing serious injury.

The court rejected the companies’ request to post a reduced bond, emphasizing that a full bond including post-judgment interest is necessary to ensure the plaintiff can recover if the verdict is upheld.

The manufacturers appealed the decision to the Tenth Circuit after the court previously denied efforts to overturn the jury’s findings or secure a new trial.

The stay pauses collection of the judgment while appellate review proceeds.

A Mississippi woman has been awarded $1 million after a jury found a pressure cooker explosion caused serious injuries.

The case centered on claims that the Bon Appetit pressure cooker’s safety mechanisms failed, allowing the lid to open while the contents were still pressurized and releasing scalding liquid and steam.

Plaintiffs in these cases typically argue that such failures indicate a defective design and inadequate safety features.

Pressure cooker litigation more broadly focuses on whether manufacturers properly designed and tested their products and whether they provided adequate warnings about the risk of explosion.

Common allegations include faulty lid-locking systems, defective pressure valves, and failures that allow devices to open under dangerous conditions.

The verdict contains many of the central issues being litigated nationwide, particularly whether certain appliances were unreasonably dangerous and whether manufacturers failed to prevent foreseeable risks of severe burn injuries from sudden explosions.

A federal judge has upheld a $9 million verdict against Sunbeam Products and its parent company, Newell Brands, in a product liability lawsuit involving a Crock Pot pressure cooker that allegedly caused severe burn injuries.

The decision denies the manufacturers’ request for a new trial and affirms the jury’s finding that the product was defective.

The case stems from injuries sustained by a consumer who suffered significant burns after the pressure cooker released hot contents under pressure.

The plaintiff argued that the appliance was defectively designed and that its safety features failed to prevent the lid from being opened while the unit remained pressurized.

The jury agreed and initially awarded more than $55 million in damages.

The total award was later reduced to approximately $9 million in accordance with Colorado’s statutory caps on damages.

Despite the reduction, the court found sufficient evidence to support the jury’s conclusions regarding liability and causation.

In post-trial motions, the defendants argued that the jury had been improperly influenced by certain demonstrative evidence, including images of burn injuries and video footage depicting pressure cooker malfunctions.

The court rejected these arguments, concluding that the jury had been properly instructed and that the evidence presented did not unfairly prejudice the outcome.

The ruling allows the verdict to stand and represents a significant development in ongoing litigation involving pressure cooker products.

Similar lawsuits have raised concerns about whether certain models can be opened while still pressurized and whether manufacturers provided adequate warnings about the risk of burn injuries.

A Colorado federal judge has denied post-trial efforts by Sunbeam and Newell Brands to overturn an approximately $9 million verdict arising from injuries caused by a multicooker, allowing the jury’s liability findings to stand.

The plaintiff alleged the appliance exploded while under pressure, causing severe burns.

A jury previously found both companies liable for design defect, failure to warn, and negligence, assigning the majority of fault to the manufacturers.

Although the original award exceeded $50 million, it was reduced to about $8.8 million under statutory limits.

In rejecting the defendants’ challenge, the court found that alleged trial errors, including references to non-admitted materials and arguments about product sales, did not materially prejudice the jury.

The court also upheld the relevance of evidence related to a product recall, finding it probative of the companies’ awareness of potential safety risks and the timing of their response.

The ruling leaves intact the jury’s findings that the product was defective and that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn consumers, with the court concluding that the evidentiary record was sufficient to support both liability and punitive damages determinations.

A pressure cooker explosion injured four workers at Chutney’s hotel in Hyderabad’s LB Nagar area around 12:30 p.m. on Friday.

Local police confirmed the blast caused serious injuries, and emergency responders took the victims to a nearby hospital for treatment.

An LB Nagar police official said authorities are still collecting details about the incident and will share more information as the investigation proceeds.

The details surrounding the explosion have not yet been publicly revealed.

Federal regulators are warning consumers to immediately stop using certain Gourmia pressure cookers after reports that the devices may eject hot food and liquid under pressure, causing serious burn injuries.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued the warning for approximately 43,500 Gourmia six-quart digital pressure cookers (model GPC625) sold between 2017 and 2020 through Best Buy and other retailers.

According to the agency, the appliances pose a significant burn hazard because the lid can open while the cooker is still pressurized, allowing hot contents to spray outward.

Regulators say the design of the cooker may contribute to the risk.

The device’s pressure indicator is located inside the handle, making it difficult for users to see whether pressure remains inside the unit.

In addition, incorrect volume markings inside the pot could cause consumers to overfill the cooker, increasing the likelihood that hot liquids will be expelled during release or when the lid is opened.

The CPSC reports that at least five incidents have already been reported, including four cases involving severe burn injuries.

Officials also confirmed that multiple lawsuits have been filed by consumers alleging burn injuries linked to the pressure cookers.

Despite the safety concerns, the manufacturer and retailer have not agreed to an acceptable recall, prompting regulators to issue a public warning advising consumers to stop using the product and dispose of it immediately.

The warning adds to growing litigation involving pressure cookers that allegedly allow users to open the lid while the contents remain under pressure, which plaintiffs claim can result in sudden explosions of hot food and liquid and cause severe burns.

A medical case review describes serious head trauma suffered after a pressure cooker exploded during use, illustrating the severe injury potential when pressure builds and the cooker fails or is opened prematurely.

According to the report, the sudden release of high-pressure steam and hot contents can cause blunt and penetrating injuries to the head and face, resulting in fractures, lacerations, and traumatic brain injury depending on proximity and force of the blast.

Clinicians noted that pressure cooker blasts can produce complex injury patterns, often requiring multidisciplinary medical care including imaging to assess skull and brain damage, surgical intervention for bleeding or fractures, and rehabilitation for neurological deficits.

The analysis underscores that exploding pressure cookers present unique risks compared with typical burn or thermal injuries, as the force of the blast itself can lead to concussive effects and secondary trauma from shrapnel or kitchen debris.

The report also highlights the importance of safety measures such as proper sealing and pressure release operation, adherence to manufacturers’ instructions, and awareness of warning signs that a cooker may be overpressurized or malfunctioning.

A widely sold Gourmia pressure cooker has been the subject of a safety warning after reports of burn injuries linked to the product prompted Best Buy to alert customers about potential hazards.

The company issued a caution advising users to carefully follow safety and usage instructions, highlighting that improper opening while the unit is pressurized can result in serious burns.

Consumer pressure cooker incidents, including cases where lids release suddenly or before pressure has fully dissipated, have increasingly drawn regulatory and legal scrutiny.

In similar situations, affected individuals have pursued civil claims against manufacturers and retailers, alleging defective design, inadequate warnings, or negligent marketing.

These lawsuits typically assert that a product’s locking mechanisms, pressure indicators, or consumer instructions were insufficient to prevent foreseeable harm and that companies failed to adequately warn users about risks.

In pressure cooker litigation nationwide, plaintiffs often bring claims for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty, focusing on whether the product’s design and safety features met reasonable expectations.

A Florida federal jury heard opening statements in a product liability lawsuit alleging that a defective Sunbeam pressure cooker caused severe burn injuries when its lid was removed while the unit was still pressurized.

The plaintiff, Shirley Johnson, a 52 year old Air Force veteran from Texas, claims the Sunbeam “six quart express crock multi cooker” malfunctioned and released scalding hot contents, resulting in burns to her arm, hand, and toe.

Plaintiff’s counsel argued that Sunbeam Products Inc. and its parent company, Newell Brands Inc., are liable under strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty theories.

The plaintiff alleges that the pressure cooker contained a defective locking pin that allowed the lid to be opened under pressure, creating a foreseeable risk of serious injury. Counsel further contends that Sunbeam was aware of multiple incident reports as early as 2017 and hired outside investigators who identified the defect, yet the company continued selling the product without disclosing the hazard.

The defense argued that Sunbeam rigorously tested the product and complied with applicable safety standards, asserting that the plaintiff ignored instructions and warnings despite having prior experience with similar appliances.

Defense counsel emphasized that Sunbeam relied on an established manufacturer and subjected the product to multiple rounds of safety evaluation, including third party testing.

The case is proceeding in federal court in Fort Lauderdale.

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against Walmart, alleging that a pressure cooker sold at one of its stores caused serious burn injuries to a consumer.

The plaintiff claims that the cooker malfunctioned while in use, releasing scalding hot contents and resulting in significant burns.

The complaint asserts that Walmart is responsible for selling a dangerous product without adequate warnings or safety instructions regarding the risk of burn injuries associated with defective pressure cooker mechanisms.

According to the lawsuit, the pressure cooker in question failed to maintain a safe sealing condition, leading to the unexpected release of pressure and hot food contents when the lid was removed.

The plaintiff alleges that the design and manufacture of the product were defective and that Walmart, as the retailer, had a duty to ensure that the products it offered for sale did not pose unreasonable risks to consumers.

Pressure cooker lawsuits are increasingly relying on burn injury patterns to reconstruct how an incident occurred when the appliance is damaged, modified, or unavailable for inspection.

Plaintiffs point to medical records showing splash burns to the face, chest, arms, and abdomen, injuries they argue are consistent with a sudden upward release of hot contents rather than a slow leak or routine spill.

Physicians and retained experts analyze burn depth, distribution, and concentration to assess the temperature and force of expelled food or liquid.

Records noting clustered burns, penetration through clothing, and rapid tissue damage are used to support conclusions that the exposure resulted from a pressure-driven event, not gradual contact.

Surgeons and burn specialists also compare burn angles, symmetry, and affected body regions to distinguish explosion-related injuries from typical kitchen accidents.

In alleged pressure cooker explosions, injuries frequently involve the upper body and face at the same time, suggesting the lid or contents were propelled upward under pressure.

These findings matter because burn pattern analysis can establish failure mechanics even without the product itself.

Courts reviewing pressure cooker explosion lawsuits are treating this medical evidence as objective support for sudden pressure release theories, which can strengthen defect claims and counter defenses that attribute injuries to spills or user error.

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against Walmart, Inc. over a Farberware-branded pressure cooker that allegedly exploded during normal use, causing severe burn injuries.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, states that the cooker’s lid opened while still pressurized, ejecting hot contents and resulting in serious physical injuries requiring medical treatment.

The plaintiff claims the device was defectively designed and that Walmart failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of using the pressure cooker.

Legal claims include strict liability, negligence, negligent design and failure to warn, and breach of implied warranty.

This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of similar complaints against Walmart and Farberware pressure cookers.

Previous cases allege comparable incidents in which lids opened while under pressure, causing scalding injuries.

Plaintiffs in these cases have raised similar concerns regarding product safety and insufficient warnings.

A new product liability lawsuit alleges an Instant Pot pressure cooker sold through Amazon malfunctioned and violently expelled hot contents after appearing to be depressurised, causing severe burn injuries.

According to the complaint, the cooker’s lid was able to open while internal pressure remained, allowing scalding soup to erupt outward.

The lawsuit says the device should not have been manually openable under pressure, particularly because it carried a UL safety certification that requires pressure cookers to resist opening during use.

The suit alleges the manufacturer and Amazon knew of prior consumer reports involving Instant Pot lids opening while pressurized and continued selling the product without adequate warnings, design changes, or a recall.

Claims include defective design, failure to warn, and violations of Washington consumer protection laws, with the plaintiffs seeking damages for medical costs, pain and suffering, and permanent injuries.

A potential product liability case is under review after a pressure cooker explosion left Brazilian influencer Rafaela Rocha Sousa, 35, with severe burns to her face and chest.

Sousa, known online as Rapha Poppet, was injured at her home in Goiás, Brazil, when a pressure cooker allegedly malfunctioned and exploded, sending boiling liquid onto her upper body.

According to Sousa’s account, she tried to turn off the appliance after noticing steam and water leaking, when the lid’s locking mechanism failed, causing it to twist and detach while still pressurized.

The resulting blast caused first- and second-degree burns stretching from her chest to her forehead.

Emergency responders treated Sousa and then transported her to a municipal hospital for additional care.

She is still recovering and has temporarily paused her work as a nail designer and educator.

Attorneys are reportedly reviewing the incident for possible claims of defective design, manufacturing defect, and failure to warn, arguing that the pressure cooker’s safety features did not prevent it from opening prematurely under pressure.

Sousa has publicly urged consumers to exercise caution when using pressure cookers, saying she is “thankful to be alive” after the incident.

A new lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleges that a defective Walmart pressure cooker caused catastrophic burn injuries after the appliance’s lid exploded unexpectedly.

Plaintiff Duyen Phan claims she suffered severe burns on December 16, 2022, while using a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker sold by Walmart.

According to the complaint, the lid exploded when Phan attempted to open it, believing the internal pressure had been released.

The pressure cooker’s locking mechanism, which is designed to prevent opening while pressurized, allegedly failed, causing scalding contents to spray outward.

Phan asserts the pressure cooker’s “safety mechanisms” were defective and that Walmart failed to redesign the appliance despite the availability of safer and more cost-effective alternatives.

The lawsuit raises claims of design defect, failure to warn, and negligence, alleging that the Farberware pressure cooker’s design allowed the lid to unlock while still under pressure.

Phan’s allegations mirror hundreds of similar reports from consumers injured by exploding pressure cookers, which have resulted in burns and long-term scarring.

Pressure cooker lawsuits have been filed against several major manufacturers, including SharkNinja, Crock-Pot, and Instant Pot, involving similar allegations that safety features failed to prevent explosions.

These cases share a common claim that manufacturers misrepresented their products as safe while knowing that defective lid mechanisms could fail under normal use

Aldi has recalled more than 46,000 Ambiano Electric Pressure Cookers after nearly a dozen reports of the appliances ejecting hot contents while still pressurized, leading to at least eight severe burn injuries.

According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the recalled units have defective lid mechanisms that may allow users to open them before internal pressure is fully released, posing a significant safety hazard.

The recall covers Ambiano models 93550 (KY-318B), 96775 (KY-318A), and 98527 (6L-PC), sold exclusively at Aldi stores between 2016 and 2019.

Consumers are urged to stop using the products immediately and return them to Aldi or contact importer Tempo International for a full refund.

The Ambiano recall echoes a growing number of similar product safety issues affecting brands like Instant Pot, Ninja Foodi, and Crock-Pot, where pressure cooker lids have reportedly failed to lock properly, resulting in explosive releases of scalding liquid and food.

These incidents have sparked a wave of product liability lawsuits alleging defective design and inadequate safety warnings.

For Aldi, this recall underscores heightened scrutiny over appliance safety and consumer protection.

Victims of pressure cooker explosions continue to pursue claims seeking compensation for burns and long-term injuries, adding to the broader litigation landscape surrounding unsafe kitchen appliances.

Sunbeam Products Inc. and its parent company, Newell Brands Inc., are facing a new federal lawsuit filed in Georgia after a Nevada woman claimed she was seriously burned by a defective pressure cooker.

The product in question, the Crock-Pot Express Crock Multicooker,  is alleged to have allowed users to remove the lid while still under pressure, resulting in dangerously hot contents being expelled.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff was using the pressure cooker in October 2023 under normal conditions when the lid unexpectedly released.

The plaintiff suffered serious burn injuries despite the product being marketed with safety features meant to prevent such accidents.

The lawsuit highlights that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled over 900,000 similar pressure cookers in 2020 due to 119 reported incidents, including 99 confirmed cases of burns ranging from first- to third-degree.

The plaintiff  alleges that Sunbeam knew of the risks but failed to redesign the product or provide sufficient warnings, despite the availability of safer alternatives.

The plaintiff’s legal team claims the company acted with “willful and conscious disregard for safety,” seeking punitive damages for what the lawsuit describes as despicable conduct.

This is not the only legal trouble for Sunbeam, another plaintiff settled a similar burn injury case earlier this week, and the company is appealing an $8.8 million verdict in Colorado over related claims.

The case, Washington v. Sunbeam Products Inc. et al., is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

A Georgia federal lawsuit against Sunbeam Products Inc. and its parent Newell Brands Inc. over an allegedly defective Crock-Pot Oval Multi-Function Pressure Cooker is poised to end after the plaintiff reported a settlement.

Fallon Sophie Koenig told the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia that she and the defendants have reached an agreement and expect to finalize and dismiss the case within 60 days.

Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

Koenig filed her complaint earlier this month alleging that while she was using the pressure cooker as directed in September 2023, the appliance opened under pressure, ejecting its contents and leaving her with severe burns.

The resolution comes as Sunbeam faces other pressure cooker litigation, including an $8.8 million damages verdict in a similar Colorado case that the company is currently appealing.

A Michigan woman has filed a pressure cooker lawsuit alleging that a Sunbeam Crock-Pot pressure cooker failed to operate safely, resulting in severe burn injuries.

The complaint, filed September 16, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, names Sunbeam Products Inc. and its parent company Newell Brands Inc. as defendants.

The lawsuit stems from a September 2023 incident in which plaintiff Fallon Sophie Koenig claims her Sunbeam Crock-Pot Oval Multi-Function Pressure Cooker allowed the lid to be removed while the unit was still pressurized.

According to the filing, the cooker appeared safe to open, but superheated contents were forcefully expelled, causing Koenig significant burn injuries that required medical treatment and resulted in ongoing physical and emotional harm.

Koenig alleges the pressure cooker was defectively designed and manufactured, contradicting Sunbeam’s marketing that its electronic models feature safety mechanisms preventing the lid from unlocking under pressure.

Her lawsuit argues that alternative, safer designs existed but were not adopted.

The claims include strict product liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and demands for punitive damages, with Koenig asserting that Sunbeam and Newell placed profits over consumer safety.

A recent report describes a severe steam burn incident involving a Ninja Foodi PossibleCooker Pro (model MC1001Q).

According to the report, the appliance unexpectedly released hot steam, causing significant injury.

While this specific model has not been recalled, as other models produced by SharkNinja have been, the nature of the burn raises concern that its pressure or steam-release mechanisms may share flaws seen in earlier Ninja multi-cookers.

From a legal perspective, this incident could lead to product liability claims.

An injured consumer might pursue lawsuits alleging design defects, manufacturing defects, or failure to warn, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and possibly punitive damages.

If additional injuries linked to this model are reported, new litigation could emerge, similar to the lawsuits filed in 2025 over recalled Ninja Foodi pressure cookers.

Those prior cases claimed that unsafe lid or pressure-release designs allowed scalding contents or steam to escape unexpectedly.

Regulators such as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may also investigate if evidence suggests a systemic defect.

Such scrutiny can result in mandatory or voluntary recalls and strengthen civil claims by injured users.

In short, the MC1001Q steam burn incident (though isolated for now) creates a foundation for individual lawsuits and regulatory action if further cases come to light.

Walmart is facing a new product liability lawsuit after a Michigan woman, Khalea Owens, suffered severe burn injuries when the lid of a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker allegedly exploded during use.

According to the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, the explosion occurred in October 2022 as Owens attempted to remove the lid, believing the pressure had been released. Instead, the contents exploded, causing serious burns.

The lawsuit alleges that Walmart falsely marketed the pressure cooker as safe, including claims that the lid could not be removed while the appliance remained pressurized.

Owens argues that this design defect makes the product unreasonably dangerous and that Walmart failed to warn consumers despite knowing the safety features were ineffective.

The case joins a growing number of pressure cooker lawsuits involving brands like Instant Pot, Ninja Foodi, Crock-Pot, and others, which allege that faulty lid-lock mechanisms have caused similar explosions and injuries.

Owens brings claims of negligence, failure to warn, and breach of implied warranty.

She also asserts that Walmart failed to issue a recall despite prior incidents and widespread reports of safety failures with similar devices.

This follows major recalls in 2023 involving nearly 2 million units from Best Buy and Sensio for related lid safety issues.

A Walmart Pressure Cooker Lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

The case, Chelsa M. v. Walmart Inc., alleges that a defective Farberware 7-in-1 Programmable Pressure Cooker caused severe burn injuries when the lid unexpectedly exploded during use.

The plaintiff purchased the pressure cooker at a Walmart Supercenter in Lake Charles, Louisiana, on September 7, 2024. She was using the appliance when the lid “suddenly and unexpectedly” detached from the pot.

The release of built-up steam, liquid, and hot food caused significant burn injuries.

The lawsuit claims the product’s safety mechanisms failed to function as advertised, as the lid should not have been able to open until the unit was fully depressurized.

The plaintiff also alleges that Walmart and the manufacturer failed to redesign the product or issue a recall, despite reports of similar incidents.

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits have been filed nationwide against multiple retailers and manufacturers, including Walmart, Sunbeam, and Instant Brands, citing similar safety failures that allowed lids to open prematurely.

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits often claim injuries such as second- and third-degree burns, permanent scarring, and long-term medical complications.

Sunbeam Products Inc. and its parent company, Newell Brands, are seeking to overturn a $9 million judgment awarded to a Colorado woman injured by a Crock-Pot Express Multi-Cooker.

The companies have filed post-trial motions requesting a new trial or judgment as a matter of law, citing alleged legal and evidentiary errors during trial proceedings.

In December 2024, a federal jury awarded Georgina Perez a total of $55.5 million in damages after she suffered severe burns when the pressure cooker’s lid allegedly opened while still pressurized.

The jury apportioned 63% liability to Newell Brands, 27% to Sunbeam, and 10% to Perez.

However, on May 29, 2025, U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer reduced the total award to approximately $9 million, applying Colorado’s statutory caps on non-economic and punitive damages.

The court found Perez did not qualify for an exemption to the cap despite the jury’s findings.

In their post-trial motions, Sunbeam and Newell argue that graphic images shown to jurors prejudiced the trial, including photos of injuries sustained by other individuals not involved in the case.

The defendants also contend that the plaintiff’s counsel improperly employed “Reptile Theory” tactics to inflame the jury and that the plaintiff failed to prove a design defect under Colorado law.

The litigation is part of a broader wave of lawsuits alleging design defects and inadequate safety features in pressure cookers.

No ruling has yet been issued on the defendants’ motions.

A Tennessee federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit against Breville USA over an allegedly defective pressure cooker can proceed to trial, rejecting the company’s efforts to exclude expert testimony and dismiss the case.

The lawsuit involves a Breville BPR600XL pressure cooker that allegedly exploded when opened, resulting in burn injuries to the user.

Breville attempted to discredit the plaintiff’s expert, arguing the methodology and conclusions were flawed.

However, the court found the expert’s opinions sufficiently reliable for a jury to evaluate, stating that any challenges should be addressed through cross-examination.

Key issues in the case include whether the pressure cooker’s lid could be opened while still under pressure, the adequacy of the locking pin design, and whether the product met safety standards such as UL 136.

The plaintiff alleges the lid opened with minimal resistance, contradicting what would be expected if the locking mechanism worked properly.

Breville also claimed the case was barred by the statute of repose, suggesting the cooker was sold more than ten years before the incident.

The judge rejected this, stating it’s the manufacturer’s burden to prove when the product was sold and that such factual questions are for the jury to decide.

This ruling underscores the growing litigation surrounding pressure cooker safety defects.

Multiple brands, including Ninja and Instant Pot, are facing similar lawsuits alleging that lids can be removed while contents are still under pressure, leading to severe burns and scalding injuries.

Over 1.8 million Ninja Foodi OP300-series multi-function pressure cookers sold nationwide (including at Costco) were recalled after regulators found the pressure-cooking lid can open during use, allowing scalding contents to erupt and cause severe burns.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission reports 106 burn injuries tied to the recalled units, more than 50 involving second- or third-degree burns to the face or body; 26 related lawsuits have already been filed.

Consumers should stop using the pressure-cooking function and contact SharkNinja for a free replacement lid (other functions like air frying may still be used).

The recall covers multiple OP300-series model numbers (OP300, OP301, OP302 variants, OP305, OP350CO and others) sold from 2019 through March 2025 at major retailers.

Check the model label on the cooker’s side panel to confirm if your unit is included. 

Recent pressure cooker lawsuits add fuel to the safety concerns: one complaint alleges a Ninja Foodi unit spewed boiling contents and caused second- and third-degree burns when the lid was opened after cooking on what was believed to be a non-pressurized “Sear” setting.

Plaintiffs in these and other pressure cooker lawsuits say marketed safety features do not always prevent a user from opening the cooker while it remains pressurized.

If you own a recalled Ninja pressure cooker, stop pressure cooking, request the repair kit, document any burn incidents, and speak with a pressure cooker lawyer if you or a family member were injured. 

Pressure cookers are common household kitchen appliances, but defects within these products can lead to dangerous malfunctions.

Recognizing early warning signs is crucial to prevent injuries.

Key Indicators of a Defective Pressure Cooker

1. Steam Leaks from Lid or Sides: Persistent steam escaping during cooking may indicate a compromised gasket or misaligned lid. This can prevent proper pressure buildup and pose burn risks.
2. Damaged or Worn Sealing Ring (Gasket): Cracks, warping, or loss of elasticity in the gasket can lead to pressure loss or unexpected lid openings. Manufacturers recommend annual replacement or sooner if defects are observed.
3. Blocked or Malfunctioning Pressure Release Valve: Obstructions from food debris can prevent proper steam release, increasing the risk of over-pressurization and potential explosions.
4. Inaccurate Pressure Readings: If the pressure indicator fails to rise or fluctuates abnormally, it may signal a malfunctioning pressure regulator, compromising cooking safety.
5. Unusual Noises or Smells: Loud hissing, rattling, or burnt odors during operation can indicate internal issues, such as overheating or component failure.

Maintenance Tips to Prevent Malfunctions Due to Defects

• Regular Cleaning: After each use, clean the lid, gasket, and valves to prevent residue buildup.
• Routine Inspections: Monthly checks for wear and tear on seals and valves can catch issues early.
• Proper Storage: Store the cooker with the lid off or inverted to prevent gasket compression and odor retention.

Recent Safety Concerns

Millions of pressure cookers have been recalled in recent years.

Earlier this month, SharkNinja recalled almost 2 million pressure cookers after more than 100 burn injuries were reported.

In 2023, nearly 1 million Insignia Multi-Function Pressure Cookers were recalled due to incorrect volume markings, leading to overfilling and burn hazards.

These incidents have resulted from regular use of common kitchen appliances, and victims of these defective pressure cookers have begun filing lawsuits to recover compensation for their injuries.

Consumers who were burned or injured by defective pressure cookers may be eligible to seek justice and compensation.

Our lawyers are actively reviewing claims involving burn injuries, especially in cases where the pressure cooker opened unexpectedly or lacked critical safety mechanisms.

Reach out today for a free consultation, or use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for a pressure cooker lawsuit instantly.

A federal judge has reduced the $55.5 million jury verdict awarded to Georgina Perez in her lawsuit against Sunbeam Products and Newell Brands after a Crock-Pot Express exploded, causing severe burn injuries.

On May 29, Judge Philip Brimmer ruled that Colorado’s statutory cap on noneconomic damages was applicable, which limited Perez’s total recovery to $9.1 million.

The reduction came after post-trial motions questioning whether Perez’s injuries met the threshold for increased damages.

Judge Brimmer denied her request to impose a higher cap, determining that her injuries, while serious, did not meet the criteria for the exception.

The final judgment orders Sunbeam to pay $3.36 million and Newell Brands to pay $5.75 million, covering both actual and punitive damages along with interest.

The outcome suggests that damage caps may influence pressure cooker injury claims, even in instances involving severe physical harm.

Perez’s case is just one of the hundreds of similar lawsuits filed nationwide against companies like Crock-Pot, Instant Pot, and Ninja Foodi.

SharkNinja is recalling about 1.8 million pressure cookers after receiving at least 106 reports of burn injuries, which include over 50 second- or third-degree burns to the face and body.

The recall affects several models in the Ninja Foodi OP300 Series due to a defect that permits the lid to open during use, releasing hot contents and potentially causing injuries.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has confirmed that over 26 lawsuits have been filed concerning the defect.

Affected models include OP300, OP301, OP301A, OP302, OP302BRN, OP302HCN, OP302HAQ, OP302HW, OP302HB, OP305, OP305CO, and OP350CO, as well as any replacements for OP300-series pressure lids.

The cookers were sold at major retailers, including Walmart, Costco, Sam’s Club, Amazon, and Target, as well as through SharkNinja’s website.

Almost 185,000 units were sold in Canada.

Consumers should stop using the pressure-cooking function immediately.

Exploding pressure cookers continue to be the center of product liability lawsuits nationwide, with plaintiffs citing severe burns, permanent scarring, and emotional trauma caused by device malfunctions.

At the center of many claims are specific, recurring design and manufacturing defects.

1. Defective Pressure Release Valves

The pressure release valve (also called a safety valve or steam valve) is a critical safety feature designed to release excess steam when internal pressure reaches a certain threshold.

In many defective units, these valves are either poorly engineered, become clogged, or simply fail to activate.

When this happens, the pressure inside the cooker builds beyond safe levels, turning the device into a sealed bomb.

Consumers have reported incidents where pressure cookers exploded without warning during or after cooking.

Scalding liquid, steam, and food fragments are ejected forcefully, often striking users in the face, chest, and hands.

In some lawsuits, victims have suffered second- and third-degree burns requiring skin grafts and long-term care.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers either ignored known issues with valve failures or failed to issue recalls.

2. Faulty Lid-Lock Mechanisms

A properly functioning lid-lock system should prevent a user from opening the pressure cooker while internal pressure remains dangerously high.

In numerous defective models, the lid-lock either fails to engage, falsely indicates that pressure has been released, or can be forcibly opened.

The result is catastrophic: the sudden release of pressure propels the lid off or causes contents to erupt outward.

Lawsuits have described incidents where users believed the cooker had depressurized based on manufacturer indicators, only for the unit to violently explode upon opening.

Some victims were sprayed with boiling liquids; others were injured by flying lids or metal shards.

Faulty lid-locks form the basis for many product liability claims, particularly when manufacturers included unreliable “safe to open” indicators.

3. Inadequate Gasket Seal Integrity

The rubber gasket inside the lid is intended to create an airtight seal that maintains pressure.

Over time—or due to poor manufacturing—these gaskets can degrade, loosen, or become misaligned.

When the seal breaks during cooking, it can cause sudden depressurization, splatter, or even trigger explosive force if combined with valve or vent blockages.

Victims have described hearing hissing sounds moments before a sudden burst of hot steam and food shot from the seams or vent area.

The result is often facial burns, eye injuries, and widespread kitchen damage.

Manufacturers are being sued for using subpar gasket materials and failing to issue adequate maintenance instructions or warnings about replacement intervals.

TorHoerman Law is actively accepting clients who have suffered injuries due to defective and dangerous pressure cookers. 

Reach out for more information and a free case evaluation. 

Pressure cooker lawsuits are being filed against a range of companies—including manufacturers, retailers, and distributors—over claims that faulty lid locks are causing serious injuries.

These cases often involve pressure cookers that can be opened while still pressurized, leading to explosions of hot food or steam.

In one recent lawsuit filed in Florida, a woman is suing both the pressure cooker manufacturer and Amazon, where she bought the product.

She claims the lid opened while the cooker was still pressurized, causing severe burns to her child.

The cooker was advertised as having multiple safety features, but the suit says those features failed.

The lawsuit accuses both Amazon and the manufacturer of negligence and selling a defective product, and seeks over $75,000 in damages.

Many of these lawsuits argue that multiple companies, not just the maker, can be held responsible when pressure cookers malfunction and cause harm.

If you’ve been injured by a defective pressure cooker, contact TorHoerman Law today. 

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

Experiencing an Instant Pot explosion can be alarming and potentially dangerous.

Here’s a comprehensive guide on immediate actions to take, medical considerations, and legal steps to protect your health and rights.

Immediate Actions After an Instant Pot Explosion

Ensure Safety: Turn off and unplug the Instant Pot to prevent further hazards. If safe, move away from the appliance to avoid exposure to hot contents or steam.​

Attend to Injuries: For burns, rinse the affected area with cool (not cold) water. Avoid applying ice or ointments. Seek medical attention promptly, especially for severe burns.​

Document the Incident:

• Photograph injuries, the damaged Instant Pot, and the surrounding area.​
• Retain the appliance and all components as evidence.​
• Keep receipts, packaging, and any communication with the manufacturer.

Medical Considerations

Instant Pot explosions can result in serious injuries, including

• First to third-degree burns
• Scarring and disfigurement
• Eye injuries from hot liquids
• Emotional trauma

It’s crucial to follow up with healthcare providers for ongoing treatment and to document all medical visits and expenses.

Legal Steps and Considerations

If you’ve been injured due to an Instant Pot explosion, you may be eligible for compensation. Here’s what you need to know:​

• Potential Compensation: Medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage.​

Evidence Collection:

• Medical records detailing injuries and treatments.​
• Photographs of injuries and the damaged appliance.
• Proof of purchase and any correspondence with the manufacturer.

Preventative Measures

To minimize the risk of future incidents:

• Follow Manufacturer Guidelines: Always adhere to the user manual instructions.​
• Regular Maintenance: Inspect the sealing ring, pressure release valve, and other components for wear or damage.
• Proper Usage: Avoid overfilling the pot and ensure the lid is securely locked before operation.​
• Stay Informed: Register your appliance with the manufacturer to receive recall notices and safety updates.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

Best Buy is facing a lawsuit filed by a Minnesota woman who suffered severe burn injuries when the lid of an Insignia pressure cooker was removed while still under pressure, despite the manufacturer’s claims of advanced safety features.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on February 5, alleges that the plaintiff was severely burned in September 2022 after the pressure cooker exploded upon her opening the lid, releasing scalding contents.

The complaint points to the manufacturer’s failure to ensure that safety mechanisms, designed to prevent such accidents, functioned properly.

Despite marketing efforts that promoted modern electronic pressure cookers like the Insignia as safer than traditional stovetop models, Rosilla’s case argues that Best Buy continued to sell defective pressure cookers even after receiving multiple reports of similar accidents.

The recall, initiated only in October 2023, affected over 900,000 units, yet by then, at least 31 incidents had already been reported, including 17 burn injuries, some involving severe second-degree burns.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

A lawsuit filed against Sunbeam Products, Inc. and Newell Brands, Inc. claims that a user suffered severe burn injuries from a defective Crock-Pot pressure cooker.

The plaintiff alleges that, in January 2022, he was able to open the lid while the cooker was pressurized, causing scalding contents to explode and injure him.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana on January 13, the lawsuit argues the Crock-Pot’s safety mechanisms failed, directly contradicting the manufacturer’s claims that their designs prevent lid removal while pressurized.

The plaintiff asserts the product was defectively designed and marketed, exposing consumers to significant harm.

The case adds to a growing number of pressure cooker lawsuits against manufacturers like Sunbeam, Instant Pot, and Ninja Foodi, all alleging similar safety failures, with recalls of nearly 2 million pressure cookers being issued in recent years due to defective lid safety mechanisms.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

A lawsuit was filed in California Superior Court on December 6, 2024, against Sensio, Inc. and Kohl’s, Inc., along with unnamed manufacturers, following severe burn injuries caused by a Bella 8-quart electric pressure cooker.

The plaintiffs allege the pressure cooker exploded and showered them with boiling chicken soup due to a defective safety feature.

The safety mechanism, designed to prevent the lid from being removed while the contents were under pressure, failed.

The incident occurred in December 2022, months before a recall.

In August 2023 nearly 900,000 Sensio Bella pressure cookers were linked to 63 reported incidents, including 61 burn injuries.

The lawsuit claims the explosion resulted in severe burns requiring hospitalization and ongoing medical care.

The plaintiffs also allege loss of income and future earning capacity due to their injuries.

The case cites strict product liability, negligent products liability, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Similar lawsuits have been filed against other manufacturers, including Instant Pot, Crock-Pot, and Ninja Foodi, for alleged design defects causing explosions when lids were removed, despite steam-release indicators suggesting it was safe.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

A Colorado federal jury has awarded $55.5 million to a Denver woman who sustained severe burns in a pressure cooker explosion, the incident, which occurred on June 3, 2019, involved the Sunbeam Express Crock Multi-Cooker.

As the woman opened the steam release valve, scalding beans erupted from the device, causing burns to 13% of her body.

Her injuries required extensive skin grafts, and she now faces permanent issues with body temperature regulation due to damaged sweat glands.

The jury assigned 63% of the blame to Newell Brands and 27% to Sunbeam, rejecting Newell’s claims of non-involvement.

The verdict included $3.5 million for pain and suffering, $2 million for physical impairment, and $50 million in punitive damages, divided between the companies.

The case focused on the cooker’s misleading safety claims. 

The manual stated that pressure would not build if the lid was improperly secured, but investigations disproved this assertion.

Evidence from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission revealed 119 incidents of lid detachment, resulting in 99 burn injuries.

This pattern of incidents supported the plaintiff’s argument that the product was dangerously flawed.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

An Ohio woman, Jazmin P., has filed a lawsuit against Sunbeam Products and Newell Brands, claiming she was severely burned by a Crock-Pot Express Crock Multi-Cooker.

Incident Details:

• Date of Injury: December 25, 2022.
• Cause: The lawsuit alleges that the pressure cooker was defective and unreasonably dangerous, as it allowed users to open the lid while the appliance was still pressurized.
• Injuries: When the plaintiff opened the lid, hot food and liquid were forcefully ejected, causing her serious burns and other injuries.

This lawsuit is one of hundreds of similar cases filed in recent years involving pressure cooker injuries.

Claims commonly allege that manufacturers failed to implement adequate safety mechanisms to prevent users from opening the device while under pressure.

The lawsuit seeks to hold Sunbeam Products and Newell Brands accountable for selling a product alleged to be dangerously flawed.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

A Louisiana woman has filed a lawsuit against Aldi, Inc. after being severely burned by an allegedly defective Ambiano 9-in-1 Programmable Pressure Cooker.

The plaintiff claims that the pressure cooker’s lid unexpectedly exploded off the pot, ejecting scalding-hot contents that caused significant burns to both her and her partner.

The incident occurred on February 21, 2023, while she was using the pressure cooker under normal conditions.

The lawsuit alleges that Aldi sold a product that was “unreasonably dangerous” due to defective safety features.

Specifically, the complaint accuses the pressure cooker of failing to prevent the lid from being removed while the unit was still pressurized, putting users at serious risk of injury.

The plaintiff seeks damages for bodily injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, physical pain, mental anguish, and a diminished quality of life.

Aldi, along with several other manufacturers, is facing hundreds of similar lawsuits related to defective pressure cookers.

Over 700 lawsuits have been filed by individuals who suffered burns from pressure cookers with faulty safety mechanisms.

More than 1 million pressure cookers have been recalled in recent years due to these defects.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits aren’t only being filed against manufacturers; they can also be filed against the stores that sell defective products.

Target was recently named in a lawsuit filed by a plaintiff who purchased a defective Instant Pot at a Target location.

The new product liability lawsuit, case 0:24-cv-02682, has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

The lawsuit involves a pressure cooker, specifically the “Instant Pot Duo Crisp,” marketed by Target Corporation and Midea America Corp.

The plaintiff suffered severe burn injuries when the pressure cooker’s lid was removed while still under pressure, causing hot contents to be forcefully ejected.

The lawsuit claims the pressure cooker has dangerous defects despite being advertised as safe.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants knew about the defects but continued selling the product without proper warnings or recalls.

The plaintiff seeks compensation for medical expenses, physical pain, and mental anguish resulting from the injuries.

This case is part of a growing number of lawsuits against various retailers and manufacturers of electronic pressure cookers.

These lawsuits claim that despite marketed safety features, the devices are prone to explosions when the lid is removed prematurely.

If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.

Use our free chatbot for a free case evaluation and find out if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

The Pressure Cooker lawsuit is ongoing and our lawyers are still accepting cases from those who have been affected by faulty appliances.

Pressure cooker lawsuits have seen a significant increase as more consumers report injuries caused by defective products.

The lawsuits primarily involve claims of burns, explosions, and other severe injuries resulting from faulty pressure cooker designs and manufacturing defects.

The core arguments in the pressure cooker lawsuits revolve around:

• Defective Design: Plaintiffs argue that the design of the pressure cookers is inherently unsafe, leading to pressure buildup and potential explosions.
• Manufacturing Defects: Allegations include that manufacturing flaws in the pressure cookers compromise the integrity of the devices, making them prone to malfunction.
• Failure to Warn: Many lawsuits claim that manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential dangers and proper usage instructions for the pressure cookers.

In response to the increasing litigation, consumer safety advocates recommend the following precautions when using pressure cookers:

• Follow Manufacturer Instructions: Adhere strictly to the usage guidelines provided by the manufacturer.
• Regular Maintenance: Ensure that safety valves and seals are in good condition and replace them as needed.
• Stay Vigilant: Avoid using pressure cookers that show signs of damage or wear.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Our Pressure Cooker Lawyers are accepting new cases from individuals who have been harmed by defective and dangerous appliances. 

A recent pressure cooker lawsuit has been filed by a New Mexico man who suffered severe burns from an Instant Pot DUO Pressure Cooker purchased on Amazon.

The lawsuit names both Amazon and Midea America Corp, and claims that the plaintiff was able to open the lid of his Instant Pot DUO while it was still pressurized.

The lawsuit claims that the pressure cooker’s safety mechanisms failed to lock the lid until it was safe to open, which directly led to the accident.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Our Pressure Cooker Lawyers are accepting new cases from individuals who have been harmed by defective and dangerous appliances. 

Over the years, dozens of brands have recalled models of electric pressure cookers for risks of malfunction that lead to explosions, ejection of hot liquid, and other potential injury risks.

A pressure cooker is a sealed pot with a valve that controls the steam pressure inside.

As the pot heats up, the liquid inside the pressure cooker forms steam, which raises the pressure in the pot.

This high pressure helps cook food faster by raising the boiling point of water and forcing moisture into the food.

The pressure cooker’s design allows it to seal in steam, which increases the internal pressure and temperature.

Pressure cookers can explode or malfunction if the steam is released suddenly, which can happen due to several reasons.

These include overfilling the cooker, using it with insufficient liquid, or a faulty pressure cooker with a malfunction of the sealing gasket or the pressure release mechanisms.

Recent Pressure Cooker Recalls:

Recently recalled pressure cookers include those by Insignia and Sensio.

These pressure cookers were recalled due to hazards like incorrect volume markings and lids that could unlock during use, posing serious burn risks.

Insignia recalled about 930,000 units for issues including overfilling risks that could lead to burns when opening the cooker.

Sensio recalled 860,000 units because the cooker’s lid could unlock and be removed during use, causing hot contents to splash out.

If you’ve been injured by a pressure cooker, you may have the grounds to file a personal injury claim.

Necessary evidence could include proof of purchase, medical records for any injuries, documentation of the malfunction (such as photos or a defective product), and a detailed account of the incident .

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Defective pressure cookers have been linked to severe injuries due to explosions resulting from excessive pressure build-up

Manufacturers are accused of failing to ensure the safety of these products, leading to burns, lacerations, and other serious injuries among users.

The design flaws specifically involve faulty safety mechanisms that fail to regulate the pressure within the cooker properly.

Evidence critical to these cases includes medical records of injuries, purchase receipts, and photographs of the damaged pressure cooker.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits are filed against manufacturers for incidents resulting in serious injuries and property damage. 

Our law firm is currently accepting new clients for injury lawsuits related to recent recalls of pressure cookers linked to potential explosion and burn risks.

Models and brands of pressure cookers recalled in the past year include:

• Bela, Cooks, and Crux Pressure Cookers: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of about 860,000 Sensio pressure cookers, sold under the brand names Bella, Bella Pro Series, Cooks and Crux.

• Issues with these models include faulty seals and lids that could unlock and open during use, posing serious burn hazards.

• Insignia Pressure Cookers: Best Buy has recalled nearly one million Insignia Multi-Function Pressure Cookers due to incorrect volume markings, which may lead to overfilling and consequently, hot contents ejecting under pressure.

Investigating these recalls and representing individuals who have suffered burns, scalds, or other injuries from pressure cooker explosions is our top priority.

Serious design flaws and manufacturing defects leading to injury risks are typically central to claims made in pressure cooker lawsuits.

If you own a recalled model, stop using it immediately and contact the manufacturer for instructions.

If you or someone you know has been injured by a pressure cooker, you may be entitled to compensation. 

Call us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation. 

Sensio Inc., a manufacturer of pressure cookers and other similar products, is facing lawsuits filed by people who have been injured by their recalled pressure cookers. 

In August 2023, Sensio recalled approximately 860,000 pressure cookers sold under the brand names Bella, Bella Pro Series, Crux, and Cooks due to safety concerns.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) publicized this recall in August 2023, citing the risk of burn injuries due to the lid unlocking mechanism.

Our law firm is currently investigating pressure cooker injury lawsuits involving these recalled products. 

Consumers reported that the lids of these pressure cookers could unlock and be removed while cooking, and have resulted in more than 60 burn injuries ranging suffered by users.

These pressure cookers were available at major U.S. retailers, including JCPenney, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, Macy’s, and Target, as well as Amazon and other online outlets, from September 2015 to September 2020.

Consumers are urged to stop using the affected pressure cookers.

If you’ve been injured by a defective pressure cooker, reach out to our law firm for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit instantly.

Best Buy has issued a recall for Insignia air fryers and air fryer ovens, encompassing multiple models due to identified risk of fire, burns, and lacerations.

The recall includes specific models of Insignia Digital Air Fryers, Insignia Analog Air Fryers, and Insignia Digital Air Fryer Ovens.

Recalled Insignia air fryers include the model numbers:

• NS-AF34D2
• NS-AF5DSS2
• NS-AF8DBD2
• NS-AF10DBK2
• NS-AF10DSS2

In October 2023, Best Buy recalled Insignia pressure cookers due to potential defects within pressure cookers that increase the risk of explosions, leading to burns and other injuries in users.

Insignia pressure cookers recalled in October include the following model numbers:

• NS-MC60SS8
• NS-MC60SS9
• NS-MC80SS9
• NS-MCRP6NS9
• NS-NCRP6SS9

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reports that these appliances pose significant hazards, with incidents of the air fryers catching fire, overheating, or causing burns and lacerations to users.

The CPSC has also documented incidents involving the Insignia pressure cookers, where users have sustained burns due to the malfunction of these appliances.

Individuals injured by these defective products may have grounds for a lawsuit due to the harm caused by the malfunctioning appliances.

Legal claims address the physical injuries and associated damages resulting from the use of these recalled products.

For those impacted, preserving evidence is crucial for supporting potential legal action.

Injured parties should retain the defective product, document the incident, preserve product receipts, and gather any medical records related to the injuries sustained.

Taking photographs of the injuries, the defective product, and the scene of the incident can provide valuable evidence in a lawsuit.

The CPSC’s announcement of the recall serves as a critical alert to consumers about the risks associated with these specific Insignia models and provides essential information for those considering legal action against the manufacturer or retailer.

If you or a loved one has experienced the adverse effects of a malfunctioning pressure cooker or air fryer, call today for a free consultation.

You can also use the ChatBot on this page for free, instant feedback.  

A Class Action Lawsuit has been filed against Best Buy for the purchase of certain recalled Insignia Pressure cookers.

The lawsuit alleges that the inner pot’s incorrect volume markings could lead to overfilling, causing hot foods and liquids to eject during venting or when under pressure.

The plaintiff claims consumers were misled about the product’s safety and seeks to represent those who purchased the recalled models.

Our law firm is currently not involved in class action lawsuits for pressure cooker defects. 

However, we are currently accepting new clients who have suffered injuries from exploding pressure cookers.

Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits are handled differently than class actions, as they typically involve individual claims of injury or damages resulting from specific incidents related to the product’s alleged defect or negligence.

In such cases, plaintiffs may pursue compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages through personal injury lawsuits filed against the manufacturer or other responsible parties.

These lawsuits often require demonstrating a direct link between the product’s defect or the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s injuries, making them distinct from class actions, which typically involve a large group of plaintiffs alleging similar claims against a defendant.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation. 

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Best Buy is recalling almost 1 million Insignia pressure cookers and separate inner pots due to a defect that can lead to hot foods spewing out, posing burn risks.

The pressure cookers have incorrect volume markings on their inner pots, causing overfilling, which can result in hot food and liquids being expelled when vented or opened.

Best Buy has received 31 incident reports, including 17 burn injuries.

The affected products were sold at Best Buy stores nationwide and online from October 2017 to June 2023.

Consumers with the recalled items are urged to stop using them and contact Best Buy for free replacements.

Refunds or in-store replacements are not offered.

Only owners of the recalled pressure cookers are eligible for the replacement kit.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation. You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Kitchenware giant Instant Brands, known for its popular Instant Pot, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The company reported liabilities and assets ranging between $500 million and $1 billion.

Instant Brands will continue its operations with the help of $132.5 million in new financing during the bankruptcy process.

The company’s financial position has been affected by tightened credit terms and higher interest rates.

Sales of its electric pressure cooker, once a kitchen staple, have declined by 50% over the past three (3) years.

Instant Brands experienced a seventh consecutive quarter of sales decline, which it attributes to macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges.

The company finished March with $95 million in cash and has around $510 million in bank debt.

Additionally, the bankruptcy filing follows a Federal Trade Commission order for Instant Brands to cease falsely claiming that its Pyrex products are made in the U.S., as many are manufactured in China.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.

Our Pressure Cooker Lawyers are talking to potential clients about their cases and strategizing the best course of action for each unique situation. 

There have been several lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of certain pressure cooker models that have exploded and injured consumers.

Some of these lawsuits are filed individually as personal injury or product liability claims.

Others have been consolidated into one district court for efficiency of handling a mass amount of claims regarding the same product.

One consolidated Pressure Cooker Lawsuit, concerning Sunbeam brand pressure cookers, is consolidated in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

The most recent developments in that case entail the federal judge presiding over the case having made a mixed ruling on a motion to dismiss filed by the defense.

Four plaintiffs in the case allege that they sustained significant physical injuries when their Sunbeam pressure cookers exploded, claiming it was due to a design defect.

They have brought tort claims against Newell Brands, Inc., the parent company of Sunbeam.

Additionally, a group of plaintiffs have filed claims in the form of a class action on behalf of a nationwide group of individuals who purchased potentially defective Sunbeam products in multiple states.

The judge dismissed most of the consumer class action claims, but allowed the consumer claims based on breach of an express warranty to proceed.

Furthermore, a consolidation of pressure cooker lawsuits against Sunbeam has taken place in Florida state court in the Circuit Court located in Palm Beach County.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries or severe burns after your pressure cooker exploded, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit against the manufacturer.

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chatbot to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Defective Pressure Cooker Lawsuit today.