Paragard Lawsuit [September 2026 Update] | Paragard IUD Lawsuit News

The second federal bellwether trial in the Paragard IUD litigation has been pushed from its original September 2026 date to April 12, 2027. 

Teva Pharmaceuticals disclosed the new date in an SEC filing, noting the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered the order in July. 

The first federal bellwether trial ended in a defense verdict for Teva on February 3.

More than 4,100 Paragard lawsuits remain pending in the federal MDL, centralized in Atlanta since December 2020. 

Plaintiffs allege the copper IUD can fracture or break during removal, sometimes requiring additional procedures to locate and remove retained fragments. 

While the next federal bellwether won’t happen until 2027, a separate Paragard case in New Jersey state court is scheduled for trial September 14, 2026. 

That case is independent of the federal MDL and could reach a jury well before the rescheduled federal trial.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 29 cases between August and September, increasing from 4,156 to 4,185.

The modest growth comes as the litigation remains affected by federal preemption proceedings that have paused the third bellwether trial and could materially affect certain failure-to-warn claims.

The appellate issue concerns what information may qualify as “newly acquired information” allowing a manufacturer to update an FDA-approved warning label, and its resolution could significantly shape the next phase of the Paragard litigation.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 45 cases between July and August, increasing from 4,111 to 4,156.

The litigation continued to move forward while the parties awaited a decision on the federal preemption appeal that has delayed the third bellwether trial.

The appeal could determine whether key failure-to-warn claims remain viable and will likely shape the next phase of the MDL.

As the appeal remains pending, new Paragard lawsuits continue to be filed alleging the IUD fractured during removal, causing serious injuries and requiring additional medical procedures.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 40 cases between June and July, increasing from 4,071 to 4,111.

The increase comes as the litigation remains focused on a key federal preemption appeal that has paused the third bellwether trial.

The appeal could determine whether plaintiffs may pursue certain failure-to-warn claims based on information Teva allegedly should have identified before updating the Paragard label.

The outcome is expected to shape future bellwether proceedings and could significantly influence the direction of the broader Paragard litigation.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 87 cases between May and June, increasing from 3,984 to 4,071.

The increase comes as the third scheduled bellwether trial remains on hold pending an appeal involving federal preemption, a legal issue that could significantly affect the scope of claims allowed to proceed against the manufacturer.

The outcome of the appeal is expected to shape future trial proceedings and remains one of the most closely watched issues in the Paragard litigation.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The federal judge overseeing the Paragard IUD litigation has paused the third scheduled bellwether trial while Teva pursues an interlocutory appeal focused on a key preemption issue that could significantly impact failure-to-warn claims across the litigation.

Teva asked the court to allow the Eleventh Circuit to immediately review whether plaintiffs can rely on information the company allegedly “should have known” through analysis of existing data, even if Teva did not actually possess that information at the time patients received the Paragard device.

The issue centers on federal “changes being effected” (CBE) regulations, which govern when manufacturers can update warning labels without prior FDA approval.

The court conditionally granted the request in part, signaling that it may allow the appeal to proceed after giving the parties time to object.

As a result, the third bellwether case, Braxton, has been stayed indefinitely pending further developments.

Teva argues that federal law bars plaintiffs’ warning claims unless they can prove the company actually possessed newly acquired safety information before the plaintiffs’ implant procedures in 2011 and 2014.

Plaintiffs, however, contend Teva could have identified safety concerns by properly analyzing data already available at the time.

Importantly, the second bellwether trial remains on schedule and will proceed as planned.

The court also ordered the parties to begin proposing a second round of bellwether cases, signaling that the broader Paragard litigation will continue moving forward despite the appellate dispute.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 2 cases between April and May, increasing from 3,982 to 3,984 cases pending.

The docket for the Paragard MDL has been stagnant since the loss of the second bellwether trial date, which is pushed to later this year.

Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of the Paragard, secured a defense verdict in the first bellwether trial that concluded in February.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 56 cases between March and April, increasing from 3,926 to 3,982.

Filing activity remains steady as the litigation continues in a mature phase.

The court continues to manage discovery and pretrial scheduling, with no new JPML transfer activity reported during the month.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD litigation added 59 cases between February and March, increasing from 3,867 to 3,926.

The court continues to oversee coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings within the federal multidistrict litigation.

Paragard bellwether trials are also in progress.

The Paragard IUD lawsuits focus on claims that the device was defectively designed and that adequate warnings were not provided regarding breakage risks during removal.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

In the federal Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Georgia, the first scheduled bellwether trial concluded with a defense verdict in favor of Teva Pharmaceuticals on February 4, 2026.

An Atlanta jury rejected the plaintiff’s claims that Teva failed to adequately warn about the risks of the Paragard intrauterine device breaking during removal and that the device was defectively designed, finding for the defense on all counts.

Following the verdict, U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May signaled that she is considering adjustments to the MDL’s bellwether trial plan.

The judge’s review reflects the impact of the first trial outcome on the planned sequence of representative trials.

The bellwether process was designed to provide early jury verdicts that inform the parties and the court about key disputed issues common to thousands of Paragard claims pending in the MDL.

The MDL docket continues to include thousands of individual lawsuits alleging that the Paragard IUD can fracture during removal, leaving fragments inside patients’ bodies and causing injuries requiring additional medical procedures.

The first bellwether trial was the first of three scheduled test cases; two additional bellwethers remain on the calendar for later in 2026.

Any revision to the bellwether plan may involve reassessment of case selection, scheduling, or trial sequencing to ensure the process remains predictive for the broader litigation.

The MDL remains in an active phase focused on jury outcomes and their implications for future trials and potential global resolution discussions.

The first federal bellwether trial in the Paragard MDL resulted in a defense verdict, with the jury rejecting claims that the copper IUD manufacturer failed to adequately warn about the risk of breakage during removal.

Bellwether trials are designed to test how juries respond to core themes in mass tort litigation.

In this case, jurors were asked to evaluate warning-label language, physician testimony, and whether breakage complications were sufficiently tied to product design rather than individual removal technique.

The defense win is now influencing how both sides assess case value across the remaining docket of thousands of claims.

Courts use these early trial results to gauge how juries interpret causation evidence and risk disclosures, and attorneys are closely reviewing what resonated, or failed, at trial.

In response, plaintiffs’ counsel may refine expert testimony and focus more narrowly on specific warning deficiencies or device design theories.

Defense teams, meanwhile, are likely to rely on the verdict in evaluating settlement posture and preparing for upcoming bellwether trials.

While one trial does not determine the outcome of the broader litigation, it often recalibrates expectations.

Bellwether results directly affect case valuation, trial sequencing, and the likelihood of coordinated settlement discussions moving forward.

A federal jury returned a defense verdict for Teva Pharmaceuticals in the first bellwether trial in the Paragard IUD Lawsuit multidistrict litigation.

Bellwether trials are early test cases selected from a larger group of lawsuits.

Courts use bellwether trials to evaluate evidence, expert testimony, and legal arguments that are common across many claims.

Outcomes in bellwether trials often influence settlement discussions and future trial strategy, though each Paragard IUD Lawsuit remains an individual case.

About a week into the initial Paragard bellwether trial, Teva requests the Georgia federal judge dismiss the punitive damages from the case.

In a mid-trial motion, Teva argues that the Paragard label warned about breakage as a matter of law, pointing to testimony that the risk was included in the warnings.

Teva argues that merely acknowledging the issue negates the failure-to-warn claim and, consequently, any justification for punitive damages.

Plaintiffs argue that the question is not whether breakage appeared on the label, but whether the warning properly conveyed the severity and likelihood of the risk.

They argue evidence shows Teva knew breakage was a recurring problem needing surgical intervention, based on adverse data and internal info, yet kept marketing Paragard as safe and easy to remove without strengthening warnings or changing design.

Plaintiffs contend that the decision is crucial for punitive damages and should be determined by the jury.

The motion aligns with Teva’s broader trial strategy following earlier rulings that dismissed warranty, gross negligence, and direct misrepresentation claims.

Here, Teva again urges the court to classify questions of warning adequacy and corporate conduct as legal issues rather than factual ones.

The judge’s ruling will influence how much evidence juries in this and future Paragard cases can consider when evaluating the manufacturer’s conduct and punitive damages.

The Paragard IUD MDL added 67 cases between January and February, increasing from 3,800 to 3,867.

Filing activity remains incremental as the docket stays in a mature phase.

Recent activity continues to center on discovery and trial-readiness issues rather than new JPML action.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

About a week into the first federal jury trial over alleged defects in the Paragard IUD, Teva Pharmaceuticals asked a Georgia federal judge to end the case early or, at a minimum, remove punitive damages from consideration.

The request comes in Teva’s first bellwether trial within a multidistrict litigation involving thousands of claims that the copper IUD is prone to breaking inside patients’ uteri.

Teva argues that the plaintiff in the bellwether trial failed to present legally sufficient evidence that the company inadequately warned about breakage risks.

According to Teva, the plaintiff’s own experts acknowledged during testimony that Paragard’s labeling included multiple warnings about breakage, particularly when the device becomes embedded.

Teva contends that no reasonable jury could find the warnings insufficient and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Even if the court allows the case to proceed, Teva argues that punitive damages are unsupported because the plaintiff cannot show gross negligence or intentional misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.

The company maintains that, at most, the dispute reflects hindsight disagreements over whether additional warnings should have been given, not conduct warranting punishment.

The motion also targets Rickard’s fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims, which Teva characterizes as duplicative failure-to-warn theories based on the same alleged statements and omissions.

The court’s ruling will be closely watched, as it could shape leverage and strategy across the broader Paragard MDL and signal how receptive courts may be to early dispositive motions in future bellwether trials.

A Georgia federal judge sharply criticized Teva Pharmaceuticals during opening statements in the first bellwether trial over allegations that its Paragard copper IUD is defectively designed and prone to breaking inside patients’ uteruses.

U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May said Teva’s lawyers made “very troubling” and inconsistent arguments to the jury, reintroducing claims the company had previously asked the court to exclude.

Judge May warned that Teva’s comparisons to other IUDs, statements about contraceptive effectiveness, and assertions that all IUDs carry inherent risks may have improperly shaped the jury’s impressions.

She indicated that corrective jury instructions could be necessary and cautioned that Teva’s approach risked undermining the fairness of the proceedings.

The trial is the first jury test case in a multidistrict litigation involving thousands of claims nationwide.

Plaintiffs allege that Teva failed to recognize and warn about a pattern of Paragard breakage, which they say forced patients to undergo invasive procedures to retrieve device fragments.

Teva disputes the claims, maintaining that breakage is a rare, known risk across IUDs and that regulators have long considered the product safe.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries is heading into its first bellwether trial in a large multidistrict litigation alleging that the Paragard copper IUD is prone to breaking during removal and leaving fragments inside patients.

The trial, beginning in Atlanta, will focus on whether Teva failed to detect and act on warning signs in its own adverse event data during the years it owned the product.

The lead plaintiff alleges her Paragard broke during a routine removal, requiring follow-up surgery and causing physical and emotional harm.

Plaintiffs in the Paragard lawsuit argue Teva should have strengthened its warning label earlier to clearly identify breakage as a known risk, based on dozens of reported incidents.

Teva counters that its labeling already disclosed breakage risks and that its adverse event reporting and regulatory practices were appropriate.

The case is expected to hinge on expert testimony about data coding practices, regulatory expectations, device design, and materials science.

With thousands of similar claims pending, the outcome is likely to shape how future Paragard cases are litigated and evaluated.

The judge overseeing the Paragard IUD MDL has confirmed that the first bellwether trial will proceed as scheduled on January 20, 2026.

In a January 12 order, U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May denied Teva’s request to delay the trial while it pursued an interlocutory appeal of earlier pretrial rulings.

Judge May stated that Teva failed to raise a controlling question of law and mentioned that even a successful appeal would not resolve the broader MDL or the selected bellwether cases.

The trial involves claims made by Pauline Rickard, who alleges she suffered serious injuries after her Paragard IUD broke during removal, necessitating surgery to remove the broken pieces.

This will be the first of over 3,700 Paragard cases pending in the MDL to go to trial before a jury, and it marks the first time that core evidence and expert testimony common to the litigation will be presented in open court.

Although the bellwether verdict will not bind other plaintiffs, the trial is expected to influence how both sides assess risk and valuation across the MDL.

The remaining two bellwether cases are scheduled to follow, with results likely to influence serious settlement talks moving forward.

A federal judge in Georgia has denied Teva Pharmaceuticals’ request to pause the first trial in thousands of lawsuits over its Paragard intrauterine device (IUD), which plaintiffs claim can break apart during removal.

The trial, scheduled for January 20, 2026, marks the first bellwether case in the multi-district litigation (MDL) In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation (N.D. Ga., No. 1:20-md-02974).

The litigation currently includes approximately 3,800 lawsuits.

Bellwether trials are intended to test claims before juries and guide potential settlement discussions.

Teva argued that an appeal of the judge’s prior ruling—rejecting its effort to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims—could end the litigation, but U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May ruled the appeal would slow the process and involved fact-specific questions unsuitable for early review.

The first bellwether plaintiff, Pauline Rickard, claims she underwent multiple procedures to remove her Paragard IUD.

Teva previously sold the device to CooperSurgical in 2017; claims against CooperSurgical were dismissed, leaving Teva as the defendant for devices implanted while it owned the device.

A federal judge overseeing the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation has narrowed some claims against Teva Pharmaceuticals ahead of the first bellwether trial, while allowing core failure-to-warn, design defect, and punitive damages issues to proceed to a jury.

The court ruled that the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence that Teva failed to adequately warn physicians about the risk that the Paragard IUD could fracture inside the uterus and require surgical removal.

Testimony indicated the device was properly prescribed, inserted, and used as intended, yet broke years before its expected lifespan.

However, the judge dismissed claims that Teva directly misrepresented risks to the patient, as well as a breach-of-warranty claim, finding there was no evidence of direct representations or of the required pre-suit notice.

The court also eliminated a standalone gross negligence claim, while ruling that evidence of reckless conduct may still support punitive damages under Florida law.

Importantly for the broader litigation, the judge allowed the design defect claim against Teva to move forward, citing expert testimony that changes in materials may have increased the risk of device breakage.

This ruling contrasts with earlier decisions shielding the current seller from design defect claims where devices were implanted before it acquired the product line.

The decision shapes the scope of evidence jurors will hear in the upcoming Paragard bellwether trial and signals that claims focused on device design, warnings to physicians, and corporate decision-making remain central to the MDL’s future.

The first jury trial in the federal Paragard IUD litigation is scheduled to begin on January 20, 2026, marking a major milestone in lawsuits brought by thousands of women alleging the birth control device is defectively designed and prone to breaking during removal.

The bellwether case will test claims that the copper-based Paragard IUD can fracture under normal removal force, leaving pieces embedded in the uterus and causing serious injuries.

Plaintiffs allege broken device fragments have led to pain, bleeding, invasive surgical procedures, fertility complications, and permanent reproductive harm.

More than 3,700 Paragard lawsuits are currently consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of Georgia, where the court is overseeing coordinated discovery and expert proceedings.

The upcoming trial is the first of three planned bellwether cases intended to help the parties evaluate how juries respond to evidence that will be repeated across the litigation.

While the outcome of the January trial will not be binding on other plaintiffs, it is expected to play a significant role in shaping settlement discussions and the future direction of the Paragard IUD litigation as a whole.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit recorded an increase in total multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases from December 2025 to January 2026.

The docket rose from 3,749 total cases in December 2025 to 3,800 in January 2026, resulting in 51 new filings during the month.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit involves claims that the Paragard copper intrauterine device fractured during removal, leaving fragments inside the uterus.

Plaintiffs allege that the device was defectively designed and that patients were not adequately warned about the risk of breakage and related complications.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit recorded an increase in total multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases between November 2025 and December 2025.

The docket rose from 3,658 cases in November 2025 to 3,749 cases in December 2025, resulting in 91 new filings.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit involves claims that the intrauterine device (IUD) Paragard caused injuries such as device breakage, uterine perforation, and other serious gynecological complications.

Plaintiffs allege that product warnings and labeling failed to adequately disclose these risks, leading to unanticipated health issues.

The MDL consolidates federal claims to streamline pretrial discovery, coordinate expert evaluations on device safety, and reduce duplicative litigation across federal courts.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

A Georgia federal judge has dismissed design defect claims against Cooper Companies in the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation, ruling the company had no role in the design of the devices used by the first three bellwether plaintiffs.

Judge Leigh Martin May granted partial summary judgment to Cooper, noting the plaintiffs, Alisa Robere, Pauline Rickard, and Melody Braxton, received their IUDs before Cooper acquired the product from Teva Pharmaceuticals in 2017.

The court has not yet ruled on failure-to-warn claims, though Judge May indicated the plaintiffs may lack evidence to establish causation.

Both sides were given 10 days to submit a supplemental briefing on that issue.

Hundreds of lawsuits remain active in the MDL, alleging Paragard IUDs can break during removal and cause serious complications.

Bellwether trials are still scheduled to proceed, beginning with Rickard’s case.

Teva Pharmaceuticals urged a Georgia federal judge to grant summary judgment in the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation, arguing that FDA approval preempts claims over the device’s design and warning labels.

The defendants contend that any changes sought by plaintiffs would have conflicted with the FDA-approved specifications, and that Paragard’s potential to break was long known and not “new information” requiring redesign.

Judge Leigh Martin May, however, expressed concern over plaintiffs’ arguments that Teva waited five years to update its warning labels after a 2010 FDA requirement.

She noted that the delay appeared intentional and questioned whether Teva was improperly using its noncompliance as a defense.

Plaintiffs argued that granting summary judgment would reward manufacturers for ignoring safety obligations and failing to act on risk data.

The litigation, involving hundreds of claims, centers on allegations that Paragard’s plastic-and-copper T-shaped frame can break inside the uterus, requiring difficult removal procedures.

The three bellwether plaintiffs each allege significant complications after Paragard breakage.

Teva and Cooper argue all state-law claims are preempted because plaintiffs’ proposed fixes (changes to materials, shape, or size) would require new FDA approval.

Cooper further asserts it should be dismissed since it purchased Paragard years after the plaintiffs received their devices.

Defense counsel also argued that prescribing doctors rarely reviewed label warnings, undermining causation.

Judge May appeared skeptical of the defense position, questioning whether a “known risk” could still constitute a design defect.

A ruling on the summary judgment motions remains pending.

The Paragard IUD MDL grew from 3,595 cases in October to 3,658 in November.

Plaintiffs allege that the copper IUD can break during removal, leading to serious injuries and the need for surgical intervention.

The litigation remains focused on product defect claims and failure to warn.

Discovery and pretrial proceedings are ongoing as the court continues to assess bellwether trial readiness.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD litigation saw a slight increase in filed actions between September and October, with total cases rising from 3,569 to 3,595.

This gain of 26 cases reflects a continued, though gradual, interest in the claims that the Paragard copper IUD can break upon removal, potentially requiring surgery or causing lasting injury.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn about the device’s risk of fracturing during removal.

As filings surpass 3,500 in the MDL, the litigation remains active with pretrial proceedings and discovery ongoing in MDL No. 2974 in the Northern District of Georgia.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) has reached a major milestone with the scheduling of its first three bellwether trials.

These trials are set to begin in early 2026, marking a pivotal moment for plaintiffs who have waited years for their claims to be heard in court.

• Trial 1: January 20, 2026
• Trial 2: March 23, 2026
• Trial 3: May 18, 2026

This tight sequence of trial dates means juries will weigh in multiple times over just a few months, generating momentum and putting sustained pressure on the defense.

With expert discovery now closed and dispositive motions due this fall, the litigation is moving out of the pretrial phase and into courtroom resolution.

The back-to-back scheduling signals that plaintiffs are closer than ever to testing their claims before a jury, an important development that could shape future settlement negotiations across the MDL.

The Paragard litigation continues to move forward in multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2974) in the Northern District of Georgia.

As of September 2025, there are 3,569 Paragard lawsuits pending, compared to 3,529 cases reported on August 1st.

This reflects an increase of 40 new filings over the past month.

The lawsuits allege that the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) is prone to breaking during removal, which can leave fragments in the uterus and cause serious complications such as infertility, organ damage, and the need for corrective surgery.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD MDL rose from 1,997 cases to 2,190 cases between August and July.

Plaintiffs continue to allege that the device breaks during removal, causing internal injuries and requiring surgery.

Recent proceedings include continued discussion of expert discovery and case-specific depositions.

A bellwether trial timeline has not yet been set, but the parties are moving forward with pretrial preparations.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

On June 26, 2025, Judge May ruled in favor of plaintiffs seeking to reopen the deposition of William Senatore in the Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL).

The decision followed objections that CooperSurgical and other defendants had improperly blocked questioning about a 2023 internal audit by invoking attorney-client privilege.

The court determined that the privilege claims were not applicable, stating that legal protections extend only to confidential communications—not to factual matters, audit logistics, or circumstances surrounding the inspection.

As a result, plaintiffs will be allowed to revisit and expand upon the previously restricted topics during a new round of testimony.

Judge May also emphasized that information related to who attended a mock FDA inspection, how frequently counsel was consulted, and what was observed during the audit falls outside the bounds of protected material.

The ruling further warned that continued misuse of privilege objections could result in sanctions, including potential cost penalties.

The Paragard MDL reached 3,474 cases between June and July, increasing from 3,330 reported on June 1st.

Plaintiffs continue to allege that the Paragard IUD fractured during removal, causing internal injuries and requiring surgical intervention.

The litigation remains focused on expert discovery and pretrial motions, including challenges to general and specific causation testimony.

Defendants maintain that the device is safe when used as directed, while plaintiffs argue that design flaws and insufficient warnings contributed to harm.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

A Delaware woman has filed a new complaint in the Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL), alleging that the Paragard IUD broke during removal and required surgical intervention.

The lawsuit was filed June 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

The defendants named in the case are Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women’s Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., and CooperSurgical, Inc.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff received the Paragard IUD in May 2014.

In 2021, she underwent removal attempts in February and March. During these procedures, one arm of the device broke off inside her body and was later located via imaging.

The plaintiff experienced heavy menstrual bleeding and underwent a hysteroscopy to remove the retained fragment.

This case adds to the growing number of claims in the Paragard MDL, which allege that the device is prone to breakage during removal and can cause serious complications.

Plaintiffs with surgical procedures, such as hysterectomies, are generally expected to pursue higher-value claims due to the long-term health consequences associated with those injuries.

Paragard MDL Judge Leigh Martin May ruled that the plaintiffs can re-question a company witness, William Senatore, granting two additional hours of questioning focused on a 2023 Inspection Preparedness Services (IPS) audit.

The company had attempted to block questions about the audit by claiming it was off-limits and protected by legal rules, but it didn’t explain precisely why or provide proof.

The judge disagreed, saying the audit relates directly to changes made at the Paragard manufacturing plant and should be allowed.

The renewed deposition must be completed within ten days.

The federal judge overseeing the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2974) has scheduled the first three bellwether trials to begin in early 2026.

The first trial is set for January 20, 2026, followed by additional trials on March 3 and May 11 of the same year.

The cases are being held in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia under Judge Leigh Martin May.

More than 3,300 lawsuits are currently pending in the MDL, with plaintiffs alleging that the Paragard copper IUD is defectively designed and prone to breaking upon removal, often requiring surgical intervention.

Plaintiffs further claim that manufacturers Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical failed to adequately warn users and healthcare providers about the risks.

The first bellwether case, Braxton v. Teva, was selected by the defense and involves a Florida woman whose IUD fractured during removal in 2019, leading to additional medical procedures.

Bellwether trials are used to evaluate how juries may respond to evidence and arguments that will be common across many cases, and may help shape future settlement negotiations.

No recalls have been issued by the FDA related to Paragard, although thousands of adverse event reports have been filed. Pretrial proceedings, including expert discovery and Daubert motions, are ongoing.

The Paragard MDL added 78 new cases between May and June, bringing the total to 3,330 total Paragard Lawsuits filed in federal court.

Plaintiffs continue to allege that the Paragard IUD is prone to break during removal, often leaving fragments embedded in the uterus and requiring surgical intervention.

Recent filings highlight cases where imaging failed to detect broken arms until patients experienced pain, bleeding, or fertility complications months later.

Lawyers are focused on strengthening claims involving emergency D&Cs, hysteroscopies, and laparoscopy procedures that followed device fracture.

Discussions around expert testimony on device design flaws remain ongoing ahead of further discovery deadlines.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. District Court overseeing the Paragard IUD multidistrict litigation (MDL) has selected the first lawsuit scheduled for a bellwether trial in January 2026.

The case involves claims that the Paragard IUD fractured during removal, requiring additional surgery to extract broken fragments.

The plaintiff alleges the broken Paragard IUD caused permanent impairment, disfigurement, and loss of reproductive health.

More than 3,200 Paragard IUD lawsuits have been filed in federal court, all alleging the device’s plastic frame can break during removal, resulting in painful injuries and surgical intervention.

Plaintiffs claim the Paragard IUD, manufactured by Teva Pharmaceuticals, was defectively designed and poses an unreasonable risk of harm.

The Paragard IUD lawsuits have been centralized in the Northern District of Georgia under U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Judge May has scheduled three bellwether trials to evaluate how juries respond to recurring evidence and expert testimony across the litigation.

The bellwether outcome will not be binding but may significantly influence potential Paragard IUD lawsuit settlement negotiations moving forward.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit involves claims that the birth control device can break during removal, leading to internal injuries, infertility, and the need for surgical intervention.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn users and healthcare providers of these risks.

216 cases have been added to the Paragard IUD MDL in the past month.

This growth has been consistent throughout this year, with 370 cases added to the litigation since January 1st.

Women who suffered complications from Paragard IUD removal continue to come forward as awareness of the risks increases.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit saw a slight increase in filings between March and April 2025.

In March, the number of Paragard Lawsuits reached 2,965.

By April 1st, the JPML reported another slight rise to 3,036 total Paragard Lawsuits.

This 71-case increase reflects the growing number of individuals who have experienced adverse effects due to the Paragard IUD, such as device fractures, migration, and injury upon removal.

The Paragard Lawsuit continues to gather momentum as those affected by the device come forward, seeking compensation for their injuries.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit involves claims that the birth control device has caused complications such as breakage during removal, leading to injuries and surgical interventions.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturer failed to warn users about these risks.

In February, 2,937 cases were filed, increasing to 2,965 in March, with 28 new claims added.

This rise reflects continued legal action from individuals experiencing complications related to the Paragard IUD.

Breakage during removal can result in severe injuries, requiring surgery and causing long-term health consequences for affected users.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The first Paragard IUD bellwether trials have been scheduled to begin in January 2026, following multiple delays in the litigation.

The first trial will start on January 12, 2026, with additional trials set for March 3 and May 11, 2026.

These cases will help determine how juries may respond to thousands of similar lawsuits pending in federal court.

Women who used the Paragard IUD, a copper-based birth control implant, have filed nearly 3,000 lawsuits, alleging that the device fractures during removal, leading to severe complications, emergency surgeries, and long-term injuries.

The cases have been consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL) before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia.

The updated trial schedule follows a recent ruling dismissing about 100 claims due to state statute of limitations laws, while allowing approximately 100 other cases to move forward.

Despite these dismissals, the manufacturers continue to face thousands of lawsuits over the IUD’s risks.

While the bellwether trials will not be binding for other cases, their outcomes are expected to influence potential Paragard IUD settlements, which could prevent the need for individual trials across the country.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

In February 2025, the number of Paragard cases increased to 2,937, rising from the 2,882 cases reported pending in the MDL in January 2025.

This increase of 55 new filings reflects the ongoing concerns regarding the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) and its associated risks, leading to more individuals seeking legal action.

The Paragard MDL continues to address allegations of serious injuries linked to the device, with many plaintiffs claiming it caused significant complications, including uterine perforation and device migration.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The number of Paragard Lawsuits pending in the MDL has increased from 2,862 in December to 2,882 in January 2025, showing a 20-case increase.

This increase in case filings reflects a continued rise in legal actions related to the defective Paragard IUD, a device that has been linked to serious health complications, including device breakage, pelvic pain, and uterine injury.

The uptick in case filings suggests ongoing awareness and action by individuals who have suffered adverse effects from the Paragard IUD.

The continued rise in the number of Paragard Lawsuits highlights the growing concerns surrounding the device’s safety and the legal accountability of its manufacturer.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit involves claims that the device, used for birth control, has caused complications such as breakage during removal, leading to injuries and surgeries.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturer failed to warn users about these risks.

In November, 2,824 cases were filed, increasing to 2,862 in December, with 38 new claims added.

Breakage during removal can result in severe injuries, requiring surgical intervention and causing significant distress to those affected.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. District Judge overseeing the Paragard IUD lawsuits has scheduled the first bellwether trials for December 2025 and February 2026, involving claims that the Paragard IUD has a risk of fracturing during removal.

These trials, initially planned for earlier dates, have faced multiple delays but are now set to move forward to help evaluate potential jury responses to the cases.

The Paragard IUD is a copper-wrapped plastic device inserted in the uterus for long-term contraception.

Marketed as a safe, removable form of birth control, it has allegedly caused serious injuries for some women when it fractured during removal, often requiring emergency surgery to retrieve broken fragments.

These injuries have led to over 2,800 lawsuits, claiming that the device is defectively designed and that its manufacturers failed to properly warn about the risks.

In December 2020, federal Paragard cases were centralized in multidistrict litigation (MDL) before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia, allowing for coordinated discovery and streamlined pretrial proceedings.

Judge May initiated a bellwether process, selecting a group of representative cases for early trials to provide insights into potential jury reactions to evidence and expert testimonies that are central to the claims.

While these bellwether trials won’t have binding outcomes on other cases, they are likely to shape settlement discussions, potentially leading to a global Paragard IUD settlement that could avoid the need for hundreds of individual trials across the U.S.

Originally expected to start in early 2024, the bellwether trials faced rescheduling, with a new trial start date of December 1, 2025.

The second bellwether trial is planned for February 2, 2026, although this date may shift based on defense counsel availability.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit involves claims that the intrauterine device (IUD) has caused severe complications, including device breakage upon removal, leading to injuries and surgeries.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn users about the risks associated with the Paragard IUD, particularly the risk of breakage.

In October, the Paragard IUD lawsuit had 2,747 cases filed, increasing to 2,824 in November, with 77 additional filings.

This rise reflects growing awareness among affected individuals about potential complications and legal options.

Breakage during Paragard IUD removal can lead to painful injuries and may require surgical intervention, impacting the health and well-being of those affected.

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries due to Paragard removal, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has quietly completed a three-year safety review into the breakage of the Paragard IUD, following mounting complaints from users and media investigations.

Paragard, the only non-hormonal copper IUD approved in the U.S., has been at the center of numerous lawsuits filed by women who experienced severe complications when the device broke during removal, sometimes leading to surgery.

As of 2024, more than 7,000 reports of Paragard breakage have been logged with the FDA, many of which were classified as serious and required hospitalization.

Women have reported life-altering complications, such as the need for hysterectomies or the permanent presence of broken IUD fragments in their bodies.

The FDA’s safety review, which concluded this year, resulted in an update to the device’s labeling to include clearer guidance for clinicians on managing cases where the IUD cannot be removed easily.

Paragard’s manufacturer, CooperSurgical, has faced a growing number of lawsuits over these breakage incidents, with plaintiffs alleging a lack of adequate warning about the risks involved.

Many of the women affected have called for more transparency and improved warnings from both the company and healthcare providers, and despite the FDA’s recent label changes, critics argue that not enough is being done to inform women about these risks.

Litigation against Paragard’s maker is expected to increase, with plaintiffs seeking compensation for the injuries caused by the device. 

However, no trial dates have been set yet, and women continue to push for more accountability and safety information.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. 

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD litigation involves claims that the medical device, used as a form of long-term birth control, is prone to break during removal, leading to serious injuries.

Women affected by the defective Paragard IUD have filed lawsuits alleging that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of breakage and the resulting complications.

In September, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 2,793 active Paragard lawsuits.

By October, that number decreased slightly to 2,747, reflecting a drop of 46 cases.

Despite the reduction, the volume of lawsuits remains significant, indicating ongoing concerns regarding the device’s safety.

Women who have suffered from broken Paragard IUDs during removal have reported injuries such as uterine perforation, infection, and the need for additional surgeries.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. 

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit has seen a slight increase in filings, with numbers rising from 2,774 in August to 2,793 in September.

This steady growth indicates continued concerns among users regarding the safety of the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD).

The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal contraceptive device, has been linked to serious complications, particularly during removal.

Some users have experienced the device breaking or fracturing, leading to severe pain, injury, and the need for additional surgeries.

These risks have led to numerous lawsuits against the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the potential dangers associated with the device.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. 

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard Lawsuit involves claims against Teva Pharmaceuticals regarding the Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device.

Plaintiffs allege that the device causes serious complications, particularly during removal.

According to the JPML, there were 2,736 cases pending in the Paragard IUD Lawsuit on July 1st.

This number has increased to 2,774 filings by August 1st.

The Paragard IUD has been reported to break during removal, causing injuries such as uterine perforation, device migration, and fragmentation.

These complications can lead to severe pain, infections, and the need for surgical intervention.

Many affected individuals have filed lawsuits against Teva Pharmaceuticals, highlighting the serious health risks involved.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit is ongoing, and our lawyers are still accepting cases from those affected by complications related to the device.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit involves claims of device breakage upon removal, resulting in severe injuries and the need for surgical removal and/or revision surgery.

The core arguments in the Paragard IUD lawsuits revolve around:

• Device Breakage: Plaintiffs argue that the Paragard IUD is prone to breaking upon removal, causing internal injuries.
• Failure to Warn: Lawsuits claim that the manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of breakage and complications during removal.
• Defective Design: Allegations include that the design of the Paragard IUD is inherently flawed, leading to a higher risk of breakage and associated injuries.

In response to the increasing litigation, healthcare professionals recommend the following precautions for those using Paragard IUD:

• Regular Monitoring: Schedule regular check-ups to ensure the IUD is in proper position and functioning correctly.
• Report Symptoms Promptly: Immediately inform your healthcare provider if you experience pain, unusual bleeding, or other complications.
• Consider Alternatives: Discuss with your doctor about potential alternative contraceptive methods if you are concerned about the risks associated with Paragard.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. 

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit involves claims that the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) causes severe injuries due to breakage during removal.

This lawsuit seeks to hold the manufacturer accountable for these defects.

In June, there were 2,690 Paragard IUD lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 2,736, reflecting growing awareness of Paragard IUD risks.

When the Paragard IUD breaks during removal, it can cause infections, uterine perforation, and require additional surgeries.

These complications have led more individuals to join the Paragard IUD lawsuit.

The Paragard IUD lawsuit aims to hold the manufacturer responsible for the harm caused by the defective device.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today.

Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD Lawsuit addresses claims against the manufacturer for design flaws that allegedly cause the device to break during removal.

There was a slight increase in Paragard IUD case filings within the last month, from 2,651 reported on May 1st to 2,690 reported on June 1st.

The primary issue with the Paragard IUD device revolves around its tendency to break upon removal, potentially causing severe pain, injury, and additional surgical interventions to retrieve broken pieces.

Individuals who have experienced complications with the Paragard IUD are encouraged to seek legal advice.

Our Paragard IUD lawyers are available for free consultations and assist with claims.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law to speak with an experienced Paragard Lawyer about your legal options today. Use our chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia issued an order regarding the Paragard IUD Lawsuit, making significant changes to the Plaintiffs’ Leadership Committee.

Several members were removed from the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC).

One individual was reassigned to the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee (PEC) and will remain as liaison counsel.

Another individual was reassigned to the PSC, and three new members were appointed to the PSC.

This restructuring aims to streamline the litigation process for claims involving the Paragard IUD.

If you’ve suffered injuries and complications from the Paragard IUD, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact our law firm for a free consultation and to get in touch with Paragard Lawyers today. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

According to the most recent filings from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), the number of Paragard IUD Lawsuits pending in the MDL has increased to 2,651.

37 new Paragard Lawsuits were sent to the MDL in the past month.

The Paragard IUD is a non-hormonal intrauterine device designed for long-term birth control, and despite its widespread use, it has been associated with serious health effects such as device fracture and migration.

Paragard IUD complications can lead to pain, infection, and even damage to internal organs.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries due to a defective Paragard IUD device, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek compensation. 

Contact us for a free consultation to learn about your rights and options. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Paragard Lawsuit instantly. 

Investigative reports have revealed that the FDA knew about concerns with Paragard IUDs breaking dating back to 2022.

An inspection of CooperSurgical’s manufacturing facility in Buffalo, New York, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) led to a highly critical report by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Despite this, CooperSurgical has not taken steps to address the reported issues of IUD breakages and the increasing complaints associated with their product, Paragard.

The FDA’s enforcement report highlights conditions or practices at the facility that could potentially compromise the safety and efficacy of the Paragard IUD.

The report specifically indicates that the establishment’s practices could result in products that are injurious to health or contaminated.

The Paragard IUD, approved for use in the United States since 1984, is marketed as a long-term, non-hormonal contraceptive device.

Paragard’s prescribing information acknowledges the risk of device breakage and difficult removal.

This indicates that the company is aware of potential issues related to the integrity and performance of the device.

However, the prescribing information does not seem to fully address the extent of complaints and adverse events reported in recent years.

Given these findings, there is a substantial basis for lawsuits against CooperSurgical for failing to adequately address known risks and potentially misleading consumers about the safety of the paragard IUD.

Individuals who have experienced complications may be eligible to join others filing Paragard IUD Lawsuits. 

Contact us today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to find out if you qualify for the Paragard IUD lawsuit. 

Currently, the total number of Paragard IUD Lawsuits pending in the MDL has reached 2,614, according to the most recent JPML filings.

This marks an increase of 44 cases added to the litigation since March 1st.

The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal inside-the-uterus device used for long-term birth control, has been linked to injuries and complications.

Plaintiffs in Paragard Lawsuits claim that the device is prone to breaking upon removal, leading to invasive procedures, serious injuries, and other health complications.

Given the seriousness of the injuries involved, individuals who have experienced complications with the Paragard IUD are encouraged to seek the help of a lawyer.

If you or a loved one has been injured by the Paragard IUD, contact Torhoerman Law today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and confidential case evaluation.

The number of Paragard IUD lawsuits has risen from 2,444 in February to 2,570 in March, 

These lawsuits are part of ongoing Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging device breakage during removal and failure to warn about potential risks.

The increase in Paragard IUD lawsuits to 2,570 in March reflects growing concerns over the device’s safety and effectiveness.

The litigation centers on allegations of Paragard IUD breakage and inadequate warnings from Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Health complications from the Paragard IUD device breaking during removal can include infection, injury to internal organs, and the potential need for surgical intervention to remove broken pieces.

If you or someone you know has experienced complications related to the Paragard IUD, it may be time to explore your legal options. 

Contact TorHoerman law today for a free consultation, or receive immediate feedback from the ChatBot located on this page. 

As of February 2024, there are a total of 2,444 Paragard IUD Lawsuits pending in the Paragard MDL according to the most recent JPML filings.

Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) are legal procedures in the United States designed to handle multiple related civil lawsuits that involve similar issues, facts, or defendants.

When numerous individuals or entities file lawsuits related to a common set of circumstances, such as product liability, pharmaceuticals, or mass tort cases, these cases can be consolidated into a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings.

MDLs aim to streamline the litigation process by centralizing the discovery process, reducing duplication of efforts, and ensuring consistent rulings on key legal issues.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently were injured, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. District Judge overseeing federal Paragard IUD lawsuits, which involve injuries from fractured implants during removal, has granted an extension.

The first bellwether trial, likely scheduled for early 2025, will provide more time for preparations.

Paragard Lawsuits claim that during removal, the IUDs fractured, leading to emergency surgeries and internal injuries.

To streamline proceedings, all federal cases were consolidated in the Northern District of Georgia as part of multidistrict litigation (MDL) in December 2020, with Judge Leigh Martin May presiding.

A bellwether program was established to assess jury reactions to evidence.

Initially set for March 2024, the first bellwether trial was rescheduled to October 2024 without explanation.

Now, a new case management order extends case-specific fact discovery until April 9, with three bellwether prospects remaining.

Expert discovery concludes on June 9, Daubert motions are due by July 23, and a consolidated pretrial order is set for November 15, 2024.

The actual trial dates are likely to begin in mid-2025.

Over 2,400 Paragard IUD lawsuits are pending, alleging defective and dangerous implants prone to breakage during removal. Bellwether trials may influence settlement negotiations to avoid individual trials in various U.S. District Courts.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently were injured, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

The first bellwether trial for the nationwide litigation involving the Paragard copper IUD is set to take place in Georgia in October 2024.

Over 2,200 lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceutical and Cooper Surgical by women who experienced issues with their Paragard IUDs, such as breakage during removal or implantation, leading to various complications.

These lawsuits argue that the T-shaped arms of the Paragard IUD are prone to breaking during removal, potentially causing severe and life-threatening injuries to women.

Complications linked to Paragard IUDs include the need for invasive surgeries like hysteroscopy to remove broken pieces, migration of these pieces to other areas of the body, or lodging in the uterus wall.

The Paragard MDL is being heard in the Northern District of Georgia, overseen by Judge Leigh Martin May.

If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently were injured, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard Lawsuit is ongoing, and TorHoerman Law’s team of Paragard Lawyers are accepting clients in all 50 states.

The Paragard Lawsuit is specifically in pre-trial stages, and all of these processes are functioning smoothly.

The first bellwether trial is still set to begin on October 28th, 2024.

There have been more than 600 cases filed since the beginning of the year, and this number is continuing to rise.

The total number of cases pending in the Paragard MDL as of September 18th, 2023 is 2,147.

If you used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered injuries, you may be eligible to file a Paragard IUD Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

As of August 17th, there are 2,094 cases pending in the Paragard litigation.

On August 23rd, Judge Leigh Martin May, who is presiding over the litigation, held a status conference.

At the conference, both parties sorted out a number of issues, including disagreements relating to the discovery process and how individual plaintiffs that have not filed a fact sheet will be handled.

The first bellwether trial is now set to start on October 28th, 2024, and the parties agreed to select and present 10 bellwether cases by the end of August 2024.

Judge May ordered to extend the trial date to allow for more time for discovery and pretrial motions.

If you used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered injuries, you may be eligible to file a Paragard IUD Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard Lawsuit instantly.

There are currently 2,094 pending Paragard Lawsuits consolidated into the Paragard MDL, and that number continues to climb slowly as pretrial proceedings continue.

While there have not been any significant updates related to the pretrial proceedings, the first bellwether trial for this MDL has been scheduled for March 4th, 2024.

The judge overseeing the MDL has not confirmed which case will be tried in the bellwether trial, but it is anticipated they will make their decision this fall.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a Paragard IUD, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

In this June 2023 Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update video, TorHoerman Law provides an update on the ongoing Paragard IUD lawsuit.

The Paragard IUD, a birth control device designed and manufactured by Teva Pharmaceuticals, has been found to break or fracture during removal, causing severe injuries that require surgery and other medical treatments.

Lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals and Cooper Surgical, the manufacturers and distributors of the Paragard IUD device.

To save you some time, here are the key points discussed in our June 2023 Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update:

• The Paragard IUD birth control device has been found to break or fracture when being removed, causing severe injuries that necessitate surgery and other medical treatment.
• Lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals and Cooper Surgical, the manufacturers and distributors of the Paragard IUD device.
• These lawsuits have been consolidated into a Paragard MDL (Multi-District Litigation) in the U.S District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
• If your Paragard IUD fractured during removal and you subsequently suffered serious injuries or other complications, you may be eligible to join the thousands of other women who have filed Paragard copper IUD lawsuits.
• Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation if you believe you may qualify for a Paragard lawsuit.

Our Paragard Lawyers are speaking to potential clients to determine their eligibility for joining the Paragard Litigation.

There are over 1,800 Paragard Lawsuits consolidated in the Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL 2974).

Procedures for selecting bellwether trials are underway.

Bellwether trials are a small consolidation of lawsuits, taken from a larger group of similar cases, to be tried first.

The bellwether trial is like a practice run to help anticipate the results of future similar cases.

When the first bellwether trials are completed in 2024, our Paragard Lawyers will have an even better idea of the average Paragard settlement and what claimants should expect.

For now, our Paragard Lawyers estimate that settlement amounts for Paragard Lawsuits could range between $10,000 and $250,000+.

These estimates are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation for your Paragard Lawsuit, they are merely estimations based on previous Copper IUD Lawsuits and other product liability lawsuits.

Visit this page for more updates on the Paragard Lawsuit, and reach out to our law firm if you have any questions or concerns.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a Paragard IUD and subsequently sought medical treatment for IUD failure, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Paragard IUD Lawsuit instantly.

The Paragard IUD litigation is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.

Currently, there are nearly 1,800 Paragard cases consolidated in multidistrict litigation.

The Paragard MDL is centralized in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

The Paragard MDL (2974) was originally formed in 2020

Both sides are preparing for the first bellwether trials, which have been scheduled for March 2024.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a Paragard IUD and subsequently sought medical treatment for IUD failure, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit instantly. 

Visit this page for more information as it becomes available.