Active LitigationMDL 3026
Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Facts
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
Active Litigation·MDL 3026
TorHoerman Law is actively accepting claims for the Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit.
There is no single nationwide filing deadline or baby formula NEC lawsuit statute of limitations because the applicable statute of limitations depends on state law, the type of claim, and the facts surrounding the child’s diagnosis.
A child’s personal injury claim may be treated differently from a parent’s claim, a wrongful death lawsuit, or a survival action, and rules involving minors, discovery, and statutes of repose may affect the deadline.
Families should not assume that a claim is still timely or already expired without an individual review of the child’s birth, treatment, formula exposure, diagnosis, and current age.
TorHoerman Law is currently reviewing NEC claims involving Enfamil products. The filing deadline for an individual claim depends on the applicable state law and facts such as the child’s age, NEC diagnosis, treatment history, and date of formula exposure.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.

There is no single nationwide statute of limitations for NEC baby formula cases.
The filing deadline depends on the law of the applicable state, the type of claim being filed, and facts such as the child’s age, date of diagnosis, location of treatment, and whether the child survived.
Many lawsuits involve preterm infants who developed necrotizing enterocolitis after receiving cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier products in a hospital or NICU.
Plaintiffs allege that premature infant formula makers failed to adequately warn parents and medical providers about reported differences in NEC risk between formula-fed infants and those receiving human milk.
A child’s personal injury claim may be governed by different rules than a parent’s claim for expenses, a survival action, or a wrongful death lawsuit.
Minority tolling, discovery rules, statutes of repose, and state-specific accrual laws may preserve some claims longer while allowing others arising from the same injury to expire sooner.
Missing the applicable deadline can prevent a family from pursuing financial compensation for medical expenses, future care, pain and suffering, permanent disability, wrongful death, and other qualifying losses.
Families should not assume that an older NEC diagnosis is automatically untimely or that a child’s age automatically extends every related claim.
TorHoerman Law is a nationally recognized product liability firm that obtained a $495 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories in an NEC baby formula trial.
If your child developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil cow’s milk-based preterm formula or fortifier, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation about a potential NEC claim and the filing deadline that may apply.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use our chat feature to see if you qualify for an NEC lawsuit instantly.
There is no single nationwide statute of limitations for an NEC formula lawsuit.
The deadline depends on the state law governing the claim, the identity of the person filing, whether the child survived, and facts such as the child’s age, date of diagnosis, and location of treatment.
Many NEC baby formula cases involve babies born prematurely or low birth weight babies who received Similac, Enfamil, or another cow’s milk-based preterm infant formula in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Plaintiffs allege that Abbott and Mead Johnson failed to adequately warn parents and medical providers about the reported risk of NEC associated with certain products sold under these baby formula brands.
The filing period for a child diagnosed with NEC may differ from the deadline governing a parent’s individual claim, a survival action, or a wrongful death lawsuit.
Some states pause or extend the deadline for a minor child, while others apply separate discovery rules, statutes of repose, or restrictions that can cause related claims to expire sooner.
Federal cases against the baby formula companies are coordinated in the NEC baby formula MDL in the Northern District of Illinois.
The federal baby formula MDL centralizes discovery and other pretrial proceedings in federal court, but it does not create one national filing deadline or extend an expired state statute of limitations.

Although families sometimes search for an NEC class action lawsuit, the federal proceeding is an MDL rather than a class action.
Each family retains an individual lawsuit, and the applicable deadline must be evaluated under the law governing that particular claim.
Families should not assume that an older NEC diagnosis is automatically too late or that the child’s age preserves every possible claim.
NEC formula lawyers must review the medical history, formula exposure, date and location of treatment, current age, and applicable state law before determining how much time remains to file.
An NEC diagnosis may give rise to several related legal claims, and each claim can follow a different filing deadline.
The applicable statute of limitations depends on who is bringing the claim, whether the child survived, the state law governing the case, and any rules involving minors, discovery, or statutes of repose.

Potential filing deadlines may apply to:
Minority tolling that preserves a child’s personal injury claim does not necessarily extend a parent’s claim, survival action, or wrongful death lawsuit.
Families should have each potential claim evaluated separately rather than assuming that one deadline applies to the entire case.
An attorney must review the child’s date of birth, NEC diagnosis, formula exposure, state and location of treatment, current age, and any date of death before calculating the applicable filing deadlines.
A parent or legal guardian may be able to file an NEC lawsuit on behalf of a child who developed necrotizing enterocolitis after receiving certain cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims in the broader NEC litigation have involved Similac products manufactured by Abbott Laboratories and Enfamil products manufactured by Mead Johnson.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting new NEC clients with claims involving Enfamil, but is no longer accepting new clients with claims involving Similac.

People who may be able to file an NEC claim include:
The NEC infant formula MDL includes individual federal lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, but it does not determine who is legally permitted to file in every case.
For Enfamil claims currently being reviewed by TorHoerman Law, relevant factors may include the child’s medical and feeding records, the specific Enfamil formula or fortifier administered, the timing of the NEC diagnosis, the injuries suffered, and the applicable state law.
NEC baby formula lawsuits have been filed against Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, the infant formula manufacturers responsible for Similac and Enfamil formula products.
Plaintiffs allege that certain cow’s milk-based preterm formulas and fortifiers increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis among premature infants compared with infants fed breast milk and that the companies failed to provide adequate warnings to parents and medical providers.

The NEC lawsuits generally involve:
State courts have produced different outcomes.
TorHoerman Law obtained a $495 million verdict against Abbott in a Missouri preterm infant formula trial, which a Missouri appeals court affirmed in May 2026.
An Illinois jury awarded $70 million to four families in April 2026, while a separate $60 million Enfamil verdict was later reversed and returned for a new trial.
The federal cases have followed a different path.
The first three Abbott bellwether cases ended in summary judgment before reaching juries, but the Inman v. Mead Johnson case survived summary judgment and is positioned to become the first federal bellwether trial to reach a jury.
That case involves allegations that a premature infant developed NEC after receiving Enfamil Premature Formula following periods when he was initially fed breast milk.
These proceedings do not establish that every infant who received formula has a viable claim or that another case will produce the same result.
If your child developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil cow’s milk-based preterm formula or fortifier, contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac. We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.
Necrotizing enterocolitis is a multifactorial intestinal disease that primarily affects premature and very-low-birth-weight infants.
National data have estimated approximately one NEC hospitalization per 1,000 live births in the United States, although the rate is substantially higher among premature infants and varies according to gestational age, birth weight, and diagnostic criteria.
Research has reported lower rates of NEC in premature infants receiving human breast milk than among infants receiving only formula.
A systematic review and meta-analysis found that preterm or low-birth-weight infants fed formula had 2.99 times the odds of developing NEC compared with infants receiving their mother’s own milk, although the authors rated the certainty of the evidence as low.

Research examining feeding practices and NEC has found:
NEC can cause intestinal tissue death, perforation, sepsis, organ failure, and the need for surgical bowel removal.
Overall mortality is commonly estimated at approximately 20% to 30%, while the mortality rate may approach or exceed 50% among extremely low-birth-weight infants with surgical or otherwise severe NEC.
Survivors of NEC may face lifelong health complications, including short bowel syndrome, digestive problems, feeding difficulties, dependence on enteral or intravenous nutrition, poor growth, and neurological or developmental impairments.
These outcomes form part of the injuries and future care needs evaluated in NEC baby formula lawsuits.
The first step in filing an NEC infant formula lawsuit is to have an attorney review the applicable statute of limitations.
Families should not wait until they have collected every medical record because the filing deadline may continue running while documents are requested.
Medical and hospital records may document the child’s gestational age, birth weight, NEC diagnosis, NICU feeding history, injuries, and the specific formula or fortifier administered.
For Enfamil claims, these records may help identify the Mead Johnson product involved, establish the timing of formula exposure and NEC diagnosis, and provide information relevant to the applicable filing deadline.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
We are still accepting clients with claims against Enfamil.

Lawyers must also identify the proper claimant, determine which state’s law applies, and decide whether the lawsuit should be filed in state or federal court.
Federal claims may be transferred to the NEC infant formula MDL for coordinated discovery, expert proceedings, pretrial motions, and bellwether test trials, but the MDL does not create a nationwide filing deadline.
Once the initial investigation is complete, the attorney can prepare and file a complaint describing the product exposure, alleged failure to warn, NEC diagnosis, resulting injuries, and damages.
Families can provide records already in their possession, while the legal team requests missing hospital documents and develops additional medical and manufacturer evidence.
If your or a loved one’s child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed infant formula made from cow’s milk, you should begin to gather evidence as soon as possible.

Evidence for an NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit might include:
Gathering evidence is very important for an NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit, and your lawyer can help you with this step in the process.
If the claim remains timely, attorneys will evaluate the child’s medical expenses, permanent injuries, future treatment and care, pain and suffering, and other damages permitted under applicable state law.

Wrongful-death and survival damages may apply when an infant dies from NEC complications.
The value of an NEC claim depends on the medical evidence, future needs, available causes of action, and governing law.
If your premature infant developed NEC after receiving an Enfamil cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier, you may be eligible to pursue an NEC baby formula lawsuit.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting new NEC clients with claims involving Enfamil.
We are no longer accepting NEC clients with claims against Similac.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation, or use the chat feature on this page to request a free case review.
Our law firm is accepting Enfamil NEC claims from families throughout the United States.

We have secured over $4 billion in compensation for people harmed at no fault of their own, and we’re here to help you.
Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means we DO NOT charge for legal representation unless your case ends in success.
Reach out to us today for more information on the NEC baby formula lawsuits.
The deadline for filing an NEC baby formula lawsuit depends on the state law governing the claim and may range from approximately one to six years under general personal injury or product liability statutes.
Some states apply a discovery rule, while others measure the filing period from the injury, diagnosis, product exposure, or another legally defined event.
A child’s personal injury claim may remain available years after the NEC diagnosis when state law pauses the statute of limitations during minority.
However, a parent’s individual claim, a survival action, or a wrongful death lawsuit may follow a separate and shorter deadline, even when the child’s own claim remains timely.
Families should not assume that an older NEC diagnosis is automatically barred or that the child’s age preserves every related claim.
An attorney must review the child’s date of birth, formula exposure, NEC diagnosis, state of treatment, injuries, and applicable state law to calculate the filing deadline.
Our NEC Baby Formula Lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means that you are not charged for legal representation unless the firm obtains a financial recovery through a settlement or judgment.
Two requested points need accurate framing: the federal docket reports actions rather than a verified count of unique families, and Abbott’s first three bellwether cases ended on summary judgment before trial.
More than 800 NEC infant formula lawsuits are pending in MDL No. 3026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and more than 1,000 federal actions have entered the litigation historically.
Additional lawsuits involving premature babies are proceeding separately in state courts.
Each family retains an individual claim based on the child’s formula exposure, NEC diagnosis, injuries, and applicable state law. (JPML)
The filing clock may begin on the date of injury or diagnosis, or when the family knew or reasonably should have known of a possible connection between the formula and the child’s injury, depending on the state’s accrual and discovery rules.
Personal injury filing periods commonly fall between two and four years, although statutes governing NEC claims may range from approximately one to six years.
Some states pause a child’s personal injury deadline during minority and allow filing after the child turns 18, but the extension may not apply to a parent’s individual claim.
A wrongful death lawsuit often must be filed within one to three years after the child’s death, although the precise deadline varies by state.
A claim involving premature baby formula, including Enfamil products, should be reviewed promptly because learning about the litigation does not necessarily restart an expired filing period.
Abbott prevailed on summary judgment in the first three federal cases selected for bellwether proceedings, meaning the claims were dismissed before juries heard them.
The fourth case in the initial bellwether group, Inman v. Mead Johnson, is an Enfamil baby formula case involving a premature infant who received Enfamil Premature Formula.
The court permitted key expert testimony to proceed, positioning the case to become the first federal premature infant formula trial in the MDL to reach a jury, subject to further rulings and scheduling.

Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit pages listed below:
A serious injury can change your life.

TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
A serious injury can change your life.