If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
The Ozempic lawsuit centers on allegations that Novo Nordisk failed to adequately warn consumers about serious risks associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 medications.
Plaintiffs allege the drug has been linked to severe gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis, as well as vision loss and other complications that have disrupted patients’ health, nutrition, employment, and daily functioning.
If you or a loved one developed gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, severe vomiting, vision loss, or other serious complications after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication, you may have legal options.
Dupixent lawsuits allege that patients treated with dupilumab therapy later developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can closely resemble severe eczema.
Research and published case reports have raised questions about whether some patients with atopic dermatitis face a higher risk of developing CTCL compared to similar patients who did not receive the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn patients and physicians about the possibility that Dupixent could worsen, accelerate, or reveal previously undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
If you or a loved one has suffered a severe reaction or blood cancer linked to Dupixent, you may be eligible to take action and file a Dupixent lawsuit.
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Tylenol (Acetaminophen), one of the most popular over the counter medications for pain relief and high fever, has been associated with an increased risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and other developmental disorders in children exposed to Acetaminophen during pregnancy.
Legal claims against manufacturers and distributors of generic Acetaminophen have been investigated on behalf of pregnant women who used Tylenol during pregnancy and children who developed disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, and more.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims allege that these devices are defectively designed and improperly marketed without adequate warnings, leading to severe injuries for patients.
TorHoerman Law is investigating claims involving spinal cord stimulators that allegedly caused serious injury instead of the relief patients were led to expect.
If you or a loved one experienced complications following spinal cord stimulator surgery, you may be eligible to pursue compensation through a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
Thousands of Uber sexual assault claims have been filed by passengers who suffered violence during rides arranged through the platform.
The ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation spans both federal law and California state court, with a consolidated Uber MDL (multi-district litigation) currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Uber sexual assault survivors across the country are coming forward to hold the company accountable for negligence in hiring, screening, and supervising drivers.
If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.
Roblox lawsuit claims center on allegations that the platform allowed predators to groom, exploit, and abuse children through unsafe design and inadequate protections.
TorHoerman Law is dedicated to helping families who believe their child was harmed on Roblox pursue justice and financial recovery.
For many families, legal action represents both a path to compensation and a way to demand systemic change in how Roblox treats the safety of its youngest players.
If your child was sexually abused, exploited, or exposed to harmful content through Roblox, you may be eligible to take legal action by filing a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Olympus Scope lawsuit claims center on allegations that certain reusable Olympus endoscopes and related accessories exposed patients to dangerous bacterial contamination after medical procedures.
These infections can lead to hospitalization, IV antibiotic treatment, sepsis, organ failure, and death, leaving many patients with serious medical complications and lasting physical harm.
You may qualify to file an Olympus scope lawsuit if you underwent an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure involving Olympus equipment and later developed a serious bacterial infection.
Families who lost a loved one after infection-related complications linked to an Olympus scope procedure may also be able to pursue a wrongful death claim.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Breast mesh lawsuits involve allegations that certain mesh products used during breast reconstruction, augmentation, and lift procedures contributed to postoperative complications and the need for revision surgeries.
Patients who experienced complications after mesh-assisted breast procedures have reported chronic pain, reconstruction problems, cosmetic deformities, and additional revision surgeries.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications after breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra technique, you may be eligible to pursue a breast mesh lawsuit claim for the harm caused.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
The AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit claims that defective implantable ports have caused patients to suffer dangerous fractures, blood clots, and infections due to the breakdown of the catheter’s material inside the body.
These failures can lead to life-threatening complications such as embolism, sepsis, or the need for surgical removal of the device.
If you or a loved one experienced severe complications such as blood clots, infections, or catheter fractures requiring surgery due to a defective AngioDynamics port catheter, you may be eligible to file an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit and seek compensation.
NEC Lawsuit claims allege that certain formulas given to infants in NICU settings increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) – a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit claims center on allegations that Sterigenics U.S., LLC and other defendants negligently released hazardous levels of ethylene oxide (EtO), exposing nearby residents and workers to a known carcinogen linked to breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious illnesses.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer or other serious health problems associated with exposure to ethylene oxide and lived near a facility with known emissions, you may be eligible to file an Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Nitrous oxide lawsuit claims center on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who profit from selling canisters that are widely misused as a recreational drug.
Reports link this misuse to severe neurological injuries, psychiatric symptoms, hypoxia, and deaths caused by accidents or overdose.
These cases are rapidly expanding as more evidence emerges of the profound physical, psychological, and social toll caused by nitrous oxide misuse.
If you or a loved one has suffered brain injuries, spinal cord or nerve damage, psychiatric symptoms, or even death linked to misused nitrous oxide, you may be eligible to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit claim and seek compensation for the harm caused.
Diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit claims center on allegations that repeated inhalation of butter-flavoring chemicals in certain workplaces, including diacetyl and related substitutes, caused permanent and preventable airway damage.
Popcorn lung, medically known as bronchiolitis obliterans or constrictive bronchiolitis, is a serious obstructive lung disease that scars and narrows the small airways, leaving many people with persistent shortness of breath, chronic cough, and reduced exercise tolerance.
TorHoerman Law has experience handling diacetyl popcorn lung cases and is currently reviewing claims from workers who believe occupational exposure to these flavoring chemicals contributed to their diagnosis.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with diacetyl induced lung disease or bronchiolitis obliterans, you may have grounds to pursue a diacetyl popcorn lung lawsuit for the harm caused to your lung tissue and long-term lung function.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The TorHoerman Law Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting claims for the AFFF Lawsuit.
Intake Closed
Most Recent Updates
TorHoerman Law is NO LONGER accepting cases for the AFFF lawsuit.
Intro to The AFFF Class Action Lawsuit
Question: Is There An AFFF Class Action Lawsuit?
In short, No.
The AFFF class action lawsuit has consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) of over 5,000 pending cases.
On this page, we‘ll dive further into the question by discussing average settlement amounts, factors that may affect AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit settlement values, (as well as average settlement values), and much more.
Overview of AFFF Lawsuits Consolidated into Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)
Many lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) due to concerns over the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in the manufacturing of certain firefighting foam foam products.
These toxic chemicals — labeled as “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down in the environment or human body — have been linked to various severe environmental and health problems like cancer.
With numerous cases being filed against manufacturers of toxic firefighting foam, a multidistrict litigation has been established to handle the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit and pursue financial compensation.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to find out if you instantly qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Our team of AFFF Lawyers are here to help you through the legal process and protect your best interests.
We understand the devastating effects toxic firefighting foam can have on the human body, and we are sensitive to your needs as a client.
Reach out to our firefighting foam lawyers today and find out how we can help you.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting clients for this litigation.
Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Consolidated Into the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL
As concerns have grown over the potential health risks associated with AFFF and PFAS exposure, numerous lawsuits were filed across the United States against AFFF manufacturers.
In response to the increasing number of claims, these lawsuits were consolidated into multidistrict litigation, known as the AFFF MDL.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL is consolidated in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.
MDLs are a practical solution when dealing with cases that allege largely the same thing, streamlining the legal process and providing consistent decisions and a more efficient resolution for plaintiffs and defendants.
The AFFF MDL aims to tackle the adverse health effects of PFAS exposure.
Is There a Class Action Lawsuit for AFFF Firefighting Foam?
No, there is not a class action lawsuit for injuries and health problems related to AFFF exposure.
Lawsuits from individuals suffering from AFFF foam related health problems and cancer are consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The most common misconception regarding the AFFF MDL is that it’s synonymous with AFFF class action lawsuits.
However, these are two separate legal actions filed for entirely different reasons.
Class action lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of AFFF products by municipalities and other public agencies for PFAS contamination in public waterways.
PFAS are highly persistent in the environment and can seep into the soil or contaminate the water source, which happened in the City of Stuart v. 3M Co.
This class action lawsuit filed by the City of Stuart claimed that the 3M company defiled the city’s water source with toxic PFAS and PFOA chemicals.
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal process allowing similar lawsuits from different federal districts to be consolidated before a judge for pretrial proceedings.
It is important to note that MDLs are not intended to merge individual cases into a class action lawsuit but to handle pretrial matters more efficiently.
The goal is to avoid duplicative discovery and inconsistent rulings, promoting a fair and just resolution for all parties involved.
This is often observed in product liability cases where synonymous reports are filed against one or more related companies.
What’s the Difference Between MDL and Class Action Lawsuits?
MDLs and class action lawsuits are often confused, but they are fundamentally different legal processes.
Several advertisements for the AFFF Lawsuit falsely refer to the litigation as the “AFFF class action MDL”, “AFFF class action lawsuit”, and more.
These terms are incorrect.
In a class action lawsuit, a group of individuals with similar claims comes together to sue a defendant or a group of defendants collectively.
Conversely, an MDL consolidates similar cases for pretrial proceedings while preserving the individuality of each case.
Unlike class actions, where a single judgment binds all plaintiffs, MDL plaintiffs retain the autonomy to pursue their claims independently.
The key differentiator here is the number of plaintiffs present in the case.
In MDLs, the number of plaintiffs remains the same despite being consolidated into an MDL.
In class action lawsuits, all victims are grouped into one and essentially become a singular plaintiff.
The differences between these two types of litigation is also visible in the way a settlement is distributed:
MDLs distribute settlements on a case-by-case basis, ensuring that each plaintiff is compensated according to the facts of their individual case and the damages claimed.
Class actions divide a large settlement evenly among all plaintiffs: regardless of how a plaintiff may have suffered individually, every plaintiff will receive the same amount of compensation.
How Does MDL Work?
Understanding the inner workings of the MDL process is essential to comprehend how AFFF lawsuits are being handled.
Listed below are the key concepts involved.
Filling of Numerous Related Lawsuits
Before an MDL could arise, a crucial factor must be present — multiple lawsuit filings of similar lawsuits.
In our case, there must be a surge of AFFF lawsuits, all bringing forth similar complaints (i.e., the severe health effects of PFAS exposure.)
Due to the similar nature of the claims, firefighting foam attorneys might urge the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to centralize these cases to streamline the proceedings.
Consolidating Similar Cases in an MDL
If the JPML approves the motion to consolidate, they will select a single federal court where all related lawsuits will be transferred for pretrial proceedings.
This court and judge will oversee the MDL, promoting efficiency and consistency in handling the cases.
Convenience to plaintiffs is often one of the essential factors the panel considers when choosing an MDL court.
Creating Order Within the MDL Parties
Upon consolidation, the MDL court appoints a leadership structure called the steering committee to organize the legal process for plaintiffs and defendants.
In most cases, the defendant’s party selects its own steering committee.
The plaintiff’s steering committee will oversee the legal strategy, prepare the plaintiffs, and streamline the legal process.
The plaintiffs will still retain their legal representatives.
The steering committee is only to provide structure.
The Bellwether Trial
To gauge the strengths and weaknesses of the claims, a small number of representative cases, known as bellwether trials, are chosen to proceed to trial.
These trials help the parties assess the potential outcomes and may shape the settlement outcome.
Receiving Mass MDL Settlements
If the bellwether trials result in favorable outcomes for the plaintiffs, it often encourages the defendants to consider settlement.
Mass settlements may be reached to provide compensation to all eligible plaintiffs within the MDL.
In this situation, the settlement is divided among members of the MDL according to the facts and damages in each individual case.
What Happens When You File an AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit?
If you were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit.
Filing an AFFF lawsuit involves the following steps.
Consultation with an attorney: Seek legal advice from an experienced attorney specializing in AFFF lawsuits. They will evaluate your case and guide you through the process.
Complaint filing: Your attorney will file a complaint on your behalf, outlining the details of your claim and the damages you seek.
MDL consolidation: If your lawsuit is deemed similar to others, it may be transferred to the AFFF MDL for pretrial proceedings.
Discovery and settlement negotiations: The discovery phase involves exchanging information between parties, while settlement negotiations may occur at any stage, including before or after bellwether trials.
Trial or settlement: Depending on the circumstances, your case may proceed to trial, or a settlement may be reached to provide compensation for your damages.
AFFF and PFAS chemicals have been found to cause or aggravate various illnesses, including cancer, reproductive issues, and immune system disorders.
Gathering medical records and documentation to support your claim is vital if you believe you’re qualified for a case.
This evidence will help establish the link between your health issues and AFFF and PFAS chemicals exposure.
Each state has specific time limits within which a lawsuit must be filed.
It’s important to consult an attorney promptly to ensure compliance with the applicable statute of limitations.
What Are the Illnesses Related to AFFF and PFAS?
Exposure to AFFF and PFAS chemicals has been associated with various illnesses.
Some of the most commonly reported cancers related to AFFF exposure include:
Kidney cancer
Testicular cancer
Prostate cancer
Breast cancer
Leukemia
Lymphoma
Thyroid disease
Liver damage
Reproductive issues
Immune system disorders
If you have been exposed to AFFF and experienced any symptoms or illnesses associated with PFAS contamination, seek medical attention and consult with an attorney to understand your legal options.
What Damages Can You Recover in an AFFF Lawsuit?
The damages you may be eligible to recover in AFFF firefighting foam cancer lawsuits can vary based on the specifics of your case.
Generally, compensatory damages aim to provide financial recovery for:
Medical expenses: This involves present and future medical treatment needed to manage your diagnosis.
Lost wages and future earning capacity: If your disease progresses drastically, you might have to let go of your work to focus on your recovery.
Pain and suffering: This compensation aims to alleviate the emotional damages and stress of the diagnosis you received from the AFFF exposure.
Loss of consortium (for spouses): If you lost your spouse from an illness brought on by AFFF exposure, you might claim compensation for their death.
An experienced attorney will assess your damages and work to maximize the compensation you receive.
How Can Experienced Firefighting Foam Lawyers Help You?
If you have been affected by AFFF and PFAS contamination, our team of experienced firefighting foam cancer lawyers is here to help.
We understand the complexities of AFFF lawsuits and will guide you through the legal process, advocating for your rights and fighting for the compensation you deserve.
We have extensive experience helping AFFF victims navigate the MDL consolidation process and ensuring they claim compensation for their damages.
Our AFFF Lawyers are sensitive to the needs of victims and understand the severity of the issues at hand.
We will work with you to understand your story, protect your best interests, and seek maximum compensation for what you’ve experienced.
Lawsuits are being filed against negligent AFFF manufacturers for putting public health at risk.
People who were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam during military service or at work have developed cancer and other serious health problems, and they have waited for justice for far too long.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other serious health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact us today to schedule your free case consultation.
You can also use our chatbot for an instant and free case evaluation.
Our dedicated and experienced firefighting foam lawyers are ready to listen to your story, evaluate your claim, and guide you toward the best course of action.
However, the answer isn’t so simple — the answer is yes and no.
To better understand this, the following key points can be noted:
There is no AFFF Class Action Lawsuit for cancer and other major health problems associated with exposure.
Class action lawsuits have been filed for PFAS contamination resulting from AFFF usage, but these do not include individuals exposed at work (such as firefighters).
The AFFF Lawsuit for individuals suffering from cancer and other related injuries is a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
No AFFF Class Action Lawsuit for Cancer & Other Major Health Problems
While it may be assumed that a class action lawsuit exists for the health problems associated with AFFF exposure, this is not the case.
However, while there is not an AFFF class action lawsuit, there is a multidistrict litigation for cancer and other major health probelms associated with exposure to AFFF (more on this below).
Individuals Exposed to AFFF at Work Not Covered in the PFAS Contamination Class Action Lawsuits Filed
Although class action lawsuits have indeed been filed in relation to PFAS contamination from AFFF usage, these lawsuits do not encompass individuals who were exposed to AFFF at their workplaces.
This means that those who were exposed to AFFF in a work environment are not included in these class action lawsuits.
However, they are covered in the multidistrict litigation discussed below.
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Filed for Individuals Suffering from Cancer & Other Related Injuries.
The legal action that does involve individuals suffering from cancer and other injuries related to AFFF exposure is a multidistrict litigation, not a class action lawsuit.
This type of litigation allows for multiple lawsuits of a similar nature to be conducted in one court, under one judge, for pretrial proceedings.
To conclude, while there are class action lawsuits related to AFFF usage, none of these are specifically for cancer and other major health problems associated with AFFF exposure.
The legal action that does involve these individuals is a multidistrict litigation, not a class action lawsuit.
Several different types of workers and professions have suffered from occupational exposure to firefighting foam.
AFFF firefighting foam was largely used by the US military, as well as municipal fire departments, airports, chemical plants, and other heavy industries that may be at risk for highly flammable liquid fires started by class B materials.
Those at risk for exposure to firefighting foam include:
Military firefighters
Other military firefighters
Flight deck workers
Airport workers
Municipal firefighters
Chemical plant workers
Workers responsible for transporting or disposing of AFFF
No settlements have been reached in the AFFF litigation as of yet, but lawyers estimate that the average AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit settlement amounts may fall between $40,000 to $300,000 or more depending on the strength of the case and other individual factors.
These AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts figures are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation in the AFFF Lawsuit, they are merely projections based on knowledge of prior mass tort cases and settlements for cancer diagnosis.
Contact an experienced firefighting foam attorney for insight on your individual claim.
Tor Hoerman has represented injured individuals for more than 30 years, with experience spanning individual personal injury cases and nationwide mass tort litigation. His work includes car accidents, catastrophic injuries, product liability claims, and other serious injury cases. Tor has served in court-appointed leadership roles in national litigation and tried cases involving major corporate defendants.
Legally Reviewed
TorHoerman Law’s legal content is researched and written by our editorial team and attorneys for legal accuracy, clarity, and relevance. We rely on statutes, court records, government publications, medical research, and other authoritative sources when applicable. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice.
Fact-Checked
TorHoerman Law reviews its legal content for factual accuracy, current information, and relevant legal context before publication and as material developments occur. This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance about a specific case, contact TorHoerman Law.
TorHoerman Law represents people whose lives have been disrupted by serious injuries, unsafe products, and negligence. Our attorneys handle individual personal injury cases as well as national mass tort lawsuits involving major corporations.
Founded in 2009, our legal team brings more than 100 years of combined experience handling serious injury and complex civil litigation.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
