PFAS Lawsuit [September 2026 Update] | PFAS Contamination Lawsuits

TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting new PFAS firefighting foam, military PFAS exposure, or community PFAS water contamination cases at this time

The site will be updated if new cases are being accepted again.

Recent data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicates that an additional 7 million Americans are now affected by drinking water contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

This marks a significant increase in the number of communities impacted by PFAS since earlier assessments.

The findings come as the EPA continues nationwide testing for PFAS under its latest regulatory efforts, which aim to set enforceable drinking water limits for several PFAS compounds.

Results reveal that PFAS contamination is not limited to isolated areas but affects water systems across the country, often near industrial sites, military bases, and areas where firefighting foam was used.

PFAS exposure has been linked to a range of health issues, including cancer, thyroid disease, developmental problems, and immune system impairment.

Public health experts warn that the growing scope of contamination underscores the urgent need for remediation and stronger regulatory action.

The updated data may influence ongoing PFAS-related litigation, including lawsuits against chemical manufacturers and companies accused of polluting water supplies.

Thousands of cases are consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL), where plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to warn about the risks associated with these chemicals.

TorHoerman Law is monitoring developments related to PFAS contamination and is actively reviewing claims for individuals and municipalities affected by these substances.

Kansas City has officially joined the nationwide litigation targeting chemical manufacturers over contamination from PFAS chemicals found in firefighting foam.

The city’s lawsuit will be filed in the U.S. District Court in South Carolina, where Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) lawsuits have been consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Kansas City’s complaint focuses on contamination in areas maintained by the Kansas City Aviation Department and KC Water, where PFAS-based foam was historically used during emergency responses and firefighting operations.

Mayor Quinton Lucas emphasized the city’s commitment to public health, stating that manufacturers—not residents—should bear the cost of cleanup. PFAS, often called “forever chemicals,” have been linked to widespread water system contamination across the U.S.

Through the lawsuit, Kansas City aims to recover expenses associated with environmental testing, regulatory compliance, site remediation, and future upgrades to protect drinking water infrastructure.

The case adds to growing municipal pressure on chemical companies to take responsibility for long-term environmental damage tied to PFAS exposure.

A state-funded study has revealed that 99.7% of individuals tested near Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico had at least one form of PFAS in their bloodstream.

The results stem from a $1.2 million initiative led by the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) and Department of Health (NMDOH), which tested 628 individuals who live or work near the base.

Key Findings from the study:

• PFOS was detected in 99.7% of participants’ blood samples.
• PFOA was found in 99.5%, PFHxS in 98.2%, and PFNA in 90.4%.
• These chemicals are linked to firefighting foams, nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing, and food packaging.

The report cites the U.S. military’s use of AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) at Cannon AFB as a likely cause. The foam is believed to have created a 4-mile contamination plume, resulting in groundwater pollution and the forced euthanization of 3,500 dairy cows.

In response to the findings, the NMED and NMDOH have pledged to:

• Allocate $12 million to connect private well users to public water systems in Curry County.
• Provide medical recommendations for participants with high PFAS levels.
• Continue well testing and treatment in high-risk areas.
• Educate healthcare providers on PFAS-related health issues.
• Expand PFAS testing near other military sites, such as Holloman AFB.
• Implement stricter regulations to prevent future contamination.

The agencies will hold a public meeting on October 23 to discuss findings and offer community support.

This report could contribute to increased PFAS-related litigation and underscores growing pressure on the U.S. military and chemical manufacturers to address legacy contamination and public health consequences tied to firefighting foams.

A University of Arizona study involving over 2,000 firefighters from several states found that donating blood or plasma significantly lowers PFAS levels in the body.

The research is among the largest U.S. studies to date examining ways to reduce occupational exposure to the “forever chemicals.”

Participants who donated blood or plasma experienced a reduction in PFAS levels, similar to earlier clinical trial findings from Australia.

PFAS chemicals accumulate in the bloodstream because they bind to proteins (particularly albumin) rather than storing in fat like many other toxins.

Regular blood or plasma donation physically removes a portion of these proteins along with the attached PFAS molecules, gradually lowering the total concentration in the body.

While the reduction is not immediate or complete, repeated donations can accelerate the body’s natural elimination process, which for some PFAS compounds can otherwise take years or decades.

Researchers also identified other effective measures that caused notable decreases: washing gear at the fire station, switching to bottled water, removing carpets from living areas, and installing reverse-osmosis water filters.

Each intervention was associated with measurable drops in PFAS levels, with some reductions surpassing 20%.

The findings provide the first large-scale evidence of practical, low-risk measures firefighters can adopt to reduce their chemical exposure, offering potential policy implications for departments and unions involved in PFAS-related health and safety efforts.

DuPont and related entities have agreed to pay over $2.5 billion to settle multiple PFAS contamination lawsuits filed by the State of New Jersey, including claims related to the historic Chamber Works site in Salem County.

Announced Monday by Attorney General Matthew Platkin, the deal is the largest environmental settlement ever reached by a single state.

The agreement resolves New Jersey’s 2019 lawsuit over Chamber Works, along with three other site-specific cases and the state’s broader PFAS directive.

Of the total, $875 million is allocated for natural resource damages and site-specific cleanup projects, including drinking water treatment at four DuPont-related facilities across the state.

The companies will also create a $1.2 billion remediation fund and set aside a $475 million reserve to guarantee long-term compliance.

The settlement follows a series of bench trials that started in May to establish DuPont’s liability under New Jersey’s Spill Act and other laws.

The court rejected DuPont’s argument that a 2005 consent order protected it from groundwater claims.

The state alleged DuPont knowingly withheld information about hazardous PFAS discharges, while DuPont argued it has long accepted responsibility for cleanup.

The deal does not settle claims against other defendants, including Chemours, which declined to comment.

The Minnesota Department of Health has identified 301 private wells in the Twin Cities east metro with elevated levels of PFAS contamination, following expanded testing near former 3M waste disposal sites.

Of those, 122 wells now need alternative water sources because of unsafe PFAS levels.

This marks a substantial rise from last year, when only 10 wells required replacement water.

The expanded testing area, including parts of Afton, West Lakeland Township, and Lake Elmo, was prompted by a better understanding of PFAS plume migration through groundwater since 3M’s disposal activities.

The company is paying for bottled water and treatment systems as part of a 2007 consent order.

The increase in contaminated wells has raised new concerns among residents relying on private groundwater systems.

A new study published by the University of Rochester Medical Center on July 23, 2025, adds to growing concerns about the health impacts of PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, by identifying specific immune system alterations in infants exposed to the chemicals during pregnancy.

Researchers analyzed data from approximately 200 mother–infant pairs, measuring PFAS levels in maternal blood and tracking changes in the infants’ immune cell profiles at birth, 6 months, and 12 months.

The study found that prenatal PFAS exposure was associated with a decrease in T follicular helper (Tfh) cells by the end of the first year—cells that play a critical role in helping the body generate long-lasting antibodies.

Additionally, increases were noted in other T-cell subsets such as Th1, Th2, and regulatory T cells, changes that may influence vulnerability to infections, allergies, or autoimmune conditions.

This is the first longitudinal study to show how prenatal PFAS exposure alters specific immune cell populations during early development.

The findings suggest that immune dysregulation may begin as early as infancy and raise concerns about long-term consequences, including impaired vaccine responses and increased risk of chronic immune-related disorders.

The study adds further scientific evidence to PFAS litigation nationwide.

Thousands of lawsuits are pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) over claims that chemical manufacturers failed to warn about the dangers of PFAS contamination in drinking water, consumer products, and firefighting foam.

Researchers recommend that pregnant individuals take precautionary steps to reduce PFAS exposure, such as using certified water filters and avoiding products known to contain the chemicals.

Further research is planned to determine whether these early-life immune changes lead to long-term health effects.

TorHoerman Law is actively reviewing claims involving PFAS-related health impacts.

The U.S. House Armed Services Committee has approved an amendment to the fiscal year 2026 defense budget that would allow the Department of Defense (DoD) to continue purchasing and using aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS chemicals until the end of fiscal year 2026.

The amendment passed the committee by a 55–2 vote.

Originally, the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act required the military to phase out PFAS-based firefighting foams by October 2023.

However, the proposed extension would permit continued use of AFFF for an additional three years, citing concerns over the military’s readiness and the availability of PFAS-free alternatives.

The amendment also includes provisions requiring the DoD to develop a plan for remediation of PFAS contamination and to provide medical training for military personnel on risks associated with PFAS exposure.

The proposed legislation comes amid growing scrutiny and ongoing litigation related to PFAS contamination.

Thousands of lawsuits have been filed by individuals, municipalities, and water systems alleging health and environmental damage caused by PFAS exposure.

Many of these lawsuits involve claims related to the use of AFFF at military bases and training facilities.

The bill must still pass the full House and Senate and be signed by the President before becoming law.

If enacted, the extension could impact both military operations and the timeline for PFAS-related environmental cleanup.

The City of Tucson has received an initial $4.8 million payment as part of a nationwide settlement related to PFAS contamination.

The funds come from litigation involving chemical manufacturers over the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), which contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals.”

The settlement is expected to provide the city with approximately $30 million in total, with additional payments to follow in future years.

Tucson officials plan to use the funds to recover costs associated with PFAS contamination, including the restoration of over 40 drinking water wells that were shut down due to elevated PFAS levels.

A portion of the money will also support construction of a water treatment facility on the city’s northwest side, projected to cost $33 million.

PFAS contamination in Tucson has been linked to the historical use of firefighting foam at nearby military and airport sites.

The chemicals are known for their persistence in the environment and have been associated with various health risks.

The settlement is part of broader national litigation against chemical manufacturers and suppliers for their alleged role in contaminating public drinking water systems with PFAS.

Just days before the trial, DuPont has agreed to pay $27 million to settle a long-standing lawsuit over PFAS contamination filed by residents of Hoosick Falls, New York.

The deal, which still needs federal court approval, settles nearly a decade of litigation over toxic PFOA pollution linked to a nearby Teflon manufacturing site.

The settlement allocates $6 million for medical monitoring, providing long-term health screenings for residents whose blood tests revealed PFOA levels more than 30 times the national average.

DuPont has not accepted liability.

This marks the final payout for the defendant in the Hoosick Falls case, following previous settlements totaling $65.25 million from companies including Saint-Gobain, Honeywell, and 3M.

Together, the village will get more than $90 million in compensation.

The case is part of a wider wave of PFAS lawsuits, including over 11,000 cases related to AFFF firefighting foam and a $1.185 billion settlement in 2024, led by DuPont, involving public water systems across the U.S.

A new report released by Waterkeeper Alliance on June 26, 2025, indicates that PFAS contamination in U.S. waterways is more widespread than previously reported.

The Phase II investigation found that 98% of tested water samples contained PFAS, and 95% of those samples had elevated levels of the toxic chemicals.

The findings mark a significant increase from the organization’s 2022 Phase I report, which detected PFAS in 83% of samples.

The second phase of testing focused on sites downstream from wastewater treatment facilities and agricultural fields treated with biosolids.

Water samples were collected from 19 states and monitored over a period of at least 20 days.

Waterkeeper Alliance CEO Marc Yaggi stated that the data points to a growing national crisis.

The organization is urging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to strengthen enforcement of drinking water standards and maintain regulations introduced under the Biden administration.

However, the group expressed concern that the EPA may shift direction and side with industrial polluters.

A new study highlighted in Neuroscience News warns that early-life exposure to certain PFAS chemicals may interfere with brain development, even at low levels.

Researchers found that PFAS can alter neurotransmitter activity and disrupt hormone signaling critical for brain growth, potentially leading to learning deficits, behavioral issues, and conditions like ADHD or autism.

The study adds to mounting evidence of PFAS toxicity and could influence ongoing lawsuits and regulatory efforts.

As lawsuits are increasingly filed against PFAS manufacturers, experts are urging stricter limits and remediation strategies to protect vulnerable populations, especially children.

Researchers used human brain cell models to demonstrate that PFAS exposure impairs key developmental pathways, including thyroid hormone signaling, which is essential for cognitive and emotional regulation.

The findings also suggest that current regulatory thresholds may underestimate the neurological risks of PFAS in drinking water and household products.

With PFAS found in everything from food packaging to firefighting foam, scientists stress the urgency of reevaluating exposure standards to safeguard public health, particularly among infants and children.

A recent study by the Waterkeeper Alliance has identified South Carolina’s Pocotaligo River as one of the most contaminated waterways in the United States, with PFAS levels far exceeding those detected in other rivers across the country.

The contamination is largely attributed to industrial discharges into Sumter’s wastewater treatment plant, which does not have the capability to remove PFAS.

Additionally, sludge from the facility, often used as fertilizer, contributes to further contamination downstream.

The findings indicate that PFAS levels downstream of the treatment plant are significantly higher than upstream, implicating both industrial and municipal wastewater sources.

These toxic chemicals, known as “forever chemicals,” are linked to cancer, immune suppression, reproductive harm, and other serious health risks.

The situation disproportionately affects low-income and Black communities in the area, many of whom rely on the river for subsistence fishing, increasing their exposure to the pollutants.

South Carolina regulators have been criticized for failing to enforce discharge limits and for the lack of statewide drinking water standards for PFAS. Without these protections, private wells and public water supplies in the region remain at risk.

The failure to address this issue has compounded the environmental and public health crisis in affected communities.

The extreme levels of contamination present a strong basis for litigation under the Clean Water Act and state environmental laws.

Evidence suggests industrial polluters and wastewater operators have discharged PFAS into the river without adequate oversight or compliance with environmental standards.

Claims for negligence, nuisance, and statutory violations are likely to arise, particularly as affected communities face significant health and environmental impacts.

The disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations may also support claims under environmental justice frameworks.

Legal actions could aim to establish enforceable discharge limits, mandate comprehensive remediation efforts, and seek damages for harm caused to the community and environment.

Litigators and advocates should push for extensive testing to identify all sources of PFAS pollution and prioritize holding responsible parties accountable.

In addition to seeking stricter regulatory standards, legal claims should focus on addressing the long-term health and environmental costs borne by impacted communities.

A new peer-reviewed study, published on June 12 in the Journal of the American Heart Association, links prenatal PFAS exposure to increased blood pressure in children.

Researchers from Johns Hopkins and Harvard discovered a dose-dependent link between PFAS exposure in utero and childhood hypertension, with stronger effects seen in adolescents, males, and Black children.

The study examined data from nearly 1,100 children in the Boston Birth Cohort, measuring PFAS levels in newborn plasma and monitoring blood pressure until age 18.

Specific chemicals, including PFDeA, PFNA, PFUnA, and PFHpS, were linked to higher systolic blood pressure.

In male children, PFHpS exposure was linked to a 17% higher risk of elevated blood pressure during adolescence.

These findings directly support claims in more than 10,000 PFAS-related lawsuits, which allege that manufacturers like 3M and DuPont failed to warn about the long-term health risks of PFAS, including prenatal and developmental damage.

Honeywell, DuPont, and several other manufacturers have filed a motion to dismiss a federal lawsuit brought by Connecticut firefighters alleging toxic exposure to PFAS-containing gear.

The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, claims that companies knowingly sold protective firefighting equipment containing PFAS while concealing the long-term health risks.

The plaintiffs, including the Uniformed Professional Fire Fighters Association of Connecticut, assert that decades of exposure to PFAS in firefighting gear has contributed to increased cancer risks among firefighters — now the leading cause of line-of-duty deaths in the profession.

In response, the defendants argue that:

• The plaintiffs have not demonstrated Article III standing or a clear injury-in-fact.
• There is no allegation the gear failed in its intended function to protect against fire.
• The complaint lacks specific evidence tying PFAS levels in the plaintiffs’ bodies to particular gear or defendants.
• Plaintiffs have not shown symptoms or diagnoses linked directly to PFAS exposure.

The lawsuit centers on claims of product liability, breach of implied warranty, and violations of Connecticut’s unfair trade practices law.

The companies maintain that the amended complaint offers no new evidence and fails to meet legal thresholds.

This case reflects mounting legal pressure on manufacturers of PFAS-containing products, especially as litigation continues to grow around firefighter foam (AFFF) and gear.

A statewide study by Penn State and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) found that 65% of private wells tested in Pennsylvania contained detectable levoutels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

Out of 167 wells sampled, 108 showed measurable PFAS levels, and 30 wells—18%—exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recently finalized maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS in drinking water.

These MCLs include strict thresholds for compounds such as PFOA and PFOS due to their links to cancer, reproductive harm, and other serious health risks.

The highest concentrations were reported in southeastern Pennsylvania, particularly in the Susquehanna Valley and York County.

By contrast, many wells in the central and western parts of the state showed no detectable PFAS.

Researchers also observed higher contamination rates near developed land, and unexpectedly, in higher-income areas.

Approximately 3.5 million residents in Pennsylvania rely on private wells, which are not subject to federal or state drinking water regulations.

The findings raise concerns about unregulated PFAS exposure in private water systems across the state.

The study’s release comes as PFAS-related litigation continues to expand nationwide, with lawsuits targeting manufacturers over contamination of drinking water sources and exposure-related health problems.

Judge Richard Gergel is urging the parties in the PFAS MDL to reach a settlement before the upcoming October 20 bellwether trial.

The trial alleges that drinking water contaminated with PFAS led to kidney cancer.

Plaintiffs requested to include testicular cancer claims, but Gergel denied the request, citing concerns about jury confusion.

The trial is the first in a series of personal injury cases related to exposure to PFAS through AFFF, a firefighting foam used for decades at military bases and airports.

Judge Gergel previously categorized claims into two groups: Group A, which includes kidney and testicular cancer, and Group B, covering thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis.

While previous PFAS settlements have dealt with contamination in public water systems, this stage of the litigation concentrates on personal injury.

A pretrial settlement would be the initial major resolution for individuals exposed to PFAS.

PFAS contaminated drinking water is a nationwide problem, and a community in Iowa is confronting the issue head-on.

Dubuque, Iowa’s drinking water has been found to contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at concentrations exceeding the EPA’s interim health advisory of 4 parts per trillion (ppt), with some wells reaching 4.2 ppt.

Although these levels remain below current enforceable limits, they raise significant public health concerns due to PFAS’s association with cancer, developmental issues, and immune system damage.

Since 2022, city and state monitoring has identified contamination primarily in shallow wells.

In response, Dubuque has deactivated two shallow wells and alternates between shallow and deep water sources to maintain finished water within advisory levels.

However, peak summer demand still necessitates reliance on the more contaminated shallow wells.

Dubuque plans to invest approximately $15 million over the next five years to construct a new deep well and upgrade filtration systems to reduce PFAS levels.

Residents have reported noticeable changes in the taste and odor of the water, prompting some to rely on home filtration systems.

The city has recommended using certified filters such as reverse osmosis or activated carbon to minimize exposure.

The presence of PFAS above health advisory levels adds to the mounting evidence for legal actions against polluters, manufacturers, and water utilities.

A Japanese government survey published June 16, 2025, has detected elevated PFAS levels at 28 of 46 groundwater sampling sites near two U.S. airfields in Okinawa—Marine Corps Air Station Futenma (Ginowan City) and Kadena Air Bas.

The contamination is primarily attributed to the use of PFAS-laden firefighting foam during training and emergency operations.

PFAS chemicals have been found to leach into groundwater near military facilities, threatening local ecosystems and public health.

Okinawa is not an isolated case.

Within the United States, over 700 military bases are grappling with similar PFAS contamination issues.

The widespread use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) at these sites has led to significant environmental and health concerns.

PFAS pollution from these bases has been detected in drinking water sources, soil, and wildlife, leading to ongoing litigation against chemical manufacturers and calls for recognition from the Department of Defense.

The contamination in Okinawa highlights how U.S. military operations contribute to a global PFAS crisis.

The affected communities in Japan now face the same challenges as those near U.S. bases, including the costly and complex task of remediation and the long-term health implications of PFAS exposure.

Legal efforts to hold polluters responsible continue to gain momentum as evidence of the widespread harm caused by PFAS becomes increasingly undeniable.

Recent studies have revealed that Holloman Lake, located near Alamogordo, New Mexico, contains the highest recorded levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the world, highlighting a severe ecological crisis.

Decades of waste dumping by the U.S. Department of Defense have resulted in contamination levels in wildlife at the lake that are 30 million times higher than the maximum contaminant level.

PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” are synthetic compounds linked to cancer, reproductive health issues, and other serious conditions.

The chemicals accumulate in the environment and bioaccumulate in wildlife, posing long-term risks to ecosystems and public health.

Cleaning up a site as extensively contaminated as Holloman Lake presents unprecedented challenges.

Researchers note that remediation efforts would require significant resources, including the removal of contaminated groundwater, soil treatment, and extensive monitoring.

Strategies such as covering contaminated soil with fresh material and replanting vegetation have been proposed, but the scale of the contamination makes these efforts exceptionally costly and complex.

Despite the dire situation, the contamination at Holloman Lake presents a unique opportunity for scientific study.

The extremely high PFAS levels allow researchers to observe the movement of these chemicals through ecosystems, providing valuable insights into their behavior in water, soil, and living organisms.

This natural laboratory could inform future efforts to mitigate and prevent similar ecological disasters.

Scientists and environmental officials are advocating for proactive measures, including bio-monitoring programs to identify and address emerging PFAS contamination sources before they reach critical levels.

The findings at Holloman Lake underscore the urgent need for accountability and comprehensive strategies to address PFAS pollution on a national scale.

Eighteen families in northwest Georgia filed three lawsuits last week against major carpet and chemical manufacturers, claiming long-term PFAS contamination on their properties.

The lawsuits, filed in Gwinnett County Superior Court, target Shaw Industries, Mohawk Industries, 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and others.

Plaintiffs allege that the companies contaminated soil, dust, and water with elevated levels of PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS, by discharging manufacturing waste into local sewer systems.

The lawsuits specify contamination levels that far exceed federal limits.

One plaintiff, James Blackwell, reported 85,000 parts per trillion of PFOA found in household dust.

Another, Priscilla Cronon, cited soil levels of 6,900 parts per trillion and dust levels that reached 76,000 parts per trillion.

These numbers stand in stark contrast to the EPA’s enforceable limit for drinking water, which is just four parts per trillion.

The plaintiffs argue that the carpet manufacturers knowingly utilized PFAS-based products—like Scotchgard, Stainmaster, and Teflon—and failed to alert the public regarding the risks involved.

They are pursuing compensation for diminished property values and health hazards, calling for measures to tackle what they characterize as hazardous environmental pollution.

Defendants have not commented publicly yet.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released new data revealing that an additional 6.5 million Americans are consuming drinking water contaminated by PFAS chemicals, bringing the total to 165 million people nationwide.

PFAS are toxic even at extremely low levels. According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS contamination has been detected in nearly everyone tested and is pervasive in the environment, including in drinking water sources.

The EPA’s findings come from the Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), which requires water utilities to test for 29 PFAS compounds.

Despite these findings, the EPA plans to roll back limits on four PFAS chemicals, retaining enforceable standards only for PFOA and PFOS.

Critics argue this rollback undermines public health protections and violates the anti-backsliding provision of the Safe Drinking Water Act, which mandates revisions to federal drinking water standards must maintain or enhance health protections.

EWG estimates nearly 30,000 industrial sites in the U.S. may be discharging PFAS into the environment, contaminating water supplies.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stated that PFAS may be detected in the blood of 99% of Americans, including newborns. Exposure is associated with immune suppression, cancer, developmental harm, and reduced vaccine efficacy.

Two PFAS-related bills, AB 1148 and SB 682, passed their chambers in the California legislature and now proceed to the opposite houses for review, indicating momentum for broader regulation of toxic substances in food packaging.

AB 1148, the Safer Food Packaging Act of 2025, would ban the manufacture, sale, or distribution of food packaging with intentionally added bisphenols or orthophthalates starting in 2027.

Authored by Assembly member LaShae Sharp-Collins, the bill passed the Assembly in early June.

The proposed bill builds upon California’s existing PFAS restrictions and has the support of environmental groups, including the Environmental Working Group.

Opponents, including the American Chemistry Council and California Food Producers, cite FDA assessments that consider existing exposure levels to these chemicals safe.

SB 682, introduced by Senator Ben Allen, aims to enhance current state-level regulations regarding PFAS.

The bill would expand the list of products, specifically including food packaging, that may not be sold or distributed in California if they contain intentionally added PFAS, starting in 2027.

The Senate approved the bill and sent it to the Assembly for consideration.

The legislation receives support from health and environmental groups, such as the NRDC and Clean Water Action.

Trade groups like the Can Manufacturers Institute and the Flexible Packaging Association oppose it.

Both bills aim to enhance California’s leadership in PFAS regulation and are expected to affect broader policy trends and litigation, especially regarding labeling, manufacturing practices, and chemical safety in consumer products.

A new study in Environmental Science & Technology highlights seafood, eggs, brown rice, and drinking water as key PFAS exposure sources for U.S. adults.

The study, analyzing 700 Californians’ blood samples and dietary habits, found exposure from food has declined due to regulatory action, but certain items still pose risks.

Drinking water remains a significant contributor, even in less-contaminated areas.

The research revealed higher PFAS blood levels in individuals consuming seafood, eggs, and brown rice.

Public water systems with detectable PFAS, even at low levels, contributed to elevated blood concentrations.

Food-related exposure appears to have decreased, likely due to the FDA’s phaseout of older PFAS chemicals from packaging and manufacturing.

The EPA adjusted PFAS drinking water standards, reaffirming limits on high-risk variants (PFOA and PFOS) while extending compliance deadlines to 2031.

Researchers call for ongoing monitoring, tighter regulation of new PFA

A major new study from the University of Arizona Health Sciences has revealed that firefighters and healthcare workers continue to face dangerously high exposure to PFAS.

These essential workers are being exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals at alarming levels without their knowledge or informed consent.

The findings offer fresh evidence that PFAS-related products, including firefighting foam and protective gear, are significant sources of chemical accumulation in frontline workers.

Researchers found that firefighters had the highest blood concentrations of PFAS among nearly 2,000 essential workers, reinforcing previous links between AFFF and long-term health risks, including cancer and immune dysfunction.

Despite reforms and foam reduction efforts, these exposures persist—largely through the use of AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) and protective gear saturated with chemicals like PFHxS and PFOS.

These compounds, known for their longevity in the human body, are linked to devastating long-term effects including cancer, immune suppression, and reproductive harm.

Equally alarming is the emerging data on healthcare workers.

The study flagged significant PFAS accumulation in this group, particularly PFHpS, PFUnA, and others, likely from everyday contact with contaminated gowns, gloves, and masks.

These findings add another layer to the overarching issue: PFAS contamination is embedded in the very tools used to protect those who care for others.

This study is not just another round of statistics.

These are indicators of a systemic failure to disclose and regulate chemical hazards faced by the workers we depend on in moments of greatest need.

Protecting essential workers from PFAS exposure must be a national priority.

The chemical industry’s failure to warn about these risks, and the regulatory gaps that allowed it, continue to place thousands of lives at risk.

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) has more than tripled the number of water bodies with “Do Not Eat” fish advisories due to heightened PFAS contamination, according to the recently released 2025 Eat Safe Fish Guide. The update increases affected waters from 33 to 98.

The revised advisories follow stricter guidelines for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), a type of PFAS chemical.

MDHHS has lowered the threshold for “Do Not Eat” designations from 300 parts per billion (ppb) to 49.6 ppb.

Consumption advisories now begin at PFOS levels as low as 1.5 ppb.

Several major bodies of water, including sections of the Kalamazoo River and local connected lakes, now have “Do Not Eat” warnings for nearly all fish species.

In Lake Michigan, carp are entirely restricted, while species like coho salmon are limited to one meal per month.

PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and accumulate in fish tissue.

Exposure is associated with a range of health risks, including cancer and reproductive issues.

MDHHS has advised residents to consult the updated 2025 Eat Safe Fish Guide for detailed consumption recommendations.

Traditional fish-cleaning and cooking methods are ineffective at removing PFOS, which is stored in the muscle tissue.

This development may impact ongoing PFAS-related litigation concerning environmental exposure and contamination claims in Michigan and beyond.

Recent scientific research has found that Firefighters have the highest PFAS blood levels among all first responder groups, with their levels remaining elevated over three years while other essential workers experienced declines.

A study tracking nearly 2,000 emergency personnel from July 2020 to April 2023 found consistently high levels of PFHxS, PFOS, and PFHpS in the blood samples of firefighters.

Plaintiffs allege that AFFF foam and turnout gear contaminated with PFAS caused their illnesses, while attorneys cite studies like this to illustrate the scale and persistence of exposure.

While some healthcare workers showed elevated levels, only firefighters consistently maintained high concentrations of PFAS over time.

The data increases the urgency of demands from fire service organizations for PFAS-free protective gear and foam.

Forever Chemicals Detected in Popular Beer Brands

New testing has revealed detectable and, in some cases, elevated levels of PFAS in several popular beer brands sold across the United States.

A peer-reviewed study led by researchers at the University of Notre Dame and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found PFAS levels above the EPA’s 4 ppt limit in some samples, with one popular brand reaching 8.3 ppt.

The findings underscore how PFAS contamination extends beyond water systems and into consumer goods — including food and beverages — due to contaminated water used in production.

The presence of PFAS in beer is likely tied to contaminated municipal water sources or brewing equipment, reflecting the pervasiveness of these chemicals in supply chain

The State of New Jersey’s PFAS lawsuit against DuPont and Chemours is underway.

The lawsuit targets the companies’ alleged negligent management of Teflon-related PFAS at the historic Chambers Works facility.

The case, which focuses on widespread environmental contamination, represents a rare trial in PFAS litigation, particularly after 3M settled similar claims for $450 million just before trial.

New Jersey contends that DuPont and Chemours caused long-term pollution by failing to properly handle toxic PFAS substances, leading to lasting harm for nearby communities.

Meanwhile, the multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873) concerning AFFF firefighting foam contamination will hold its first bellwether trial this October, focusing on personal injury claims involving kidney cancer.

The U.S. District Court for South Carolina selected up to three plaintiffs from Pennsylvania who allege their cancer was caused by PFAS exposure from former Navy air bases in Warminster and Horsham.

The trial marks the first personal injury case to test whether PFAS exposure can be legally linked to specific diseases.

Judge Richard Gergel chose to exclude testicular cancer claims in the initial trial to reduce jury confusion, but additional trials and scientific hearings are scheduled for other PFAS-related conditions, including liver and thyroid cancer.

Defendants include 3M, DuPont, Chemours, BASF, and Arkema, companies that face thousands of additional lawsuits alleging PFAS exposure caused illness or property damage.

The bellwether trial will set a precedent for how future claims are evaluated and potentially litigated nationwide.

The EPA will rollback new federal limits for three PFAS chemicals and extend industries’ timeline to meet new federal standards on PFOA and PFOS in public drinking water.

Late last year, the Biden administration implemented the first federal drinking water limits for PFAS, in an effort to limit the public’s risk for certain injuries, such as cancer and birth injuries, tied to these forever chemicals.

Now, the EPA has announced it will reduce or entirely remove these limits on three common types of PFAS chemicals.

The previous administration set federal standards on two of the most common types of PFAS – PFOA and PFOS. These limits were set at 4 parts per trillion in public drinking water, which is the lowest level at which the PFAS chemicals can be detected.

The EPA will keep the four parts per trillion limits for PFOA and PFOS, but will give utilities until 2031 to meet the standards.

Environmental groups condemned the move as a rollback of core public health protections, arguing the adminstration is “making a mocker of the adminstration’s promise to deliver clean water for Americans.”

PFAS water contamination lawsuits continue to be filed across the US by individuals who have developed serious injuries resulting from exposure to forever chemicals in their drinking water.

These rollbacks in federal regulations will put more Americans at risk of developing injuries related to PFAS exposure.

The City of Dallas filed a $228 million lawsuit against more than 20 chemical companies, including 3M and DuPont, for the alleged contamination of the city’s drinking water with PFAS.

Filed in Dallas County District Court, the suit claims that the corporations knowingly marketed PFAS-containing products, such as firefighting foam, without disclosing the long-term risks to human health or the environment.

Dallas argues that the contamination has forced the city to undertake costly mitigation efforts to ensure safe drinking water.

City officials said they expect cleanup costs to rise further and that the burden of PFAS-related damages should not fall on taxpayers.

The lawsuit seeks to recover both past and projected expenses linked to water testing, treatment, and public health response.

The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced that groundwater contamination involving per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” has been detected in 47 communities across the state of Illinois.

This contamination affects drinking water systems serving more than 400,000 residents statewide.

Following the recent enactment of the Safe Public Drinking Water Act by Governor J.B. Pritzker, Illinois has adopted stricter groundwater standards, setting the PFAS limit at four parts per trillion.

This limit is set at a level that is considered safe for human consumption, and any level above this poses a potential health risk.

Some communities, including Lincoln, Marquette Heights, Rosiclare, and Edwardsville, recorded PFAS levels exceeding the new standard. 

For example, in Lincoln, one sample measured 5.5 parts per trillion, slightly above the updated threshold.

Under the new legislation, public water systems are required to notify all affected customers through mail and email.

Water system operators must implement necessary treatment solutions, such as advanced filtration systems, or find alternative water sources, like tapping into uncontaminated aquifers, to meet the updated standards.

Operators are given until April 2029 to achieve full compliance.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals used in a variety of consumer products, including non-stick cookware and cosmetics.

They are known for their persistence in the environment and human body, with potential health risks including developmental issues, fertility problems, increased blood pressure during pregnancy, and a heightened risk of certain cancers.

The Illinois EPA has initiated comprehensive mitigation efforts to address the PFAS contamination, providing a sense of reassurance to the public.

Many impacted water systems have already begun planning or implementing steps to address PFAS contamination, such as enhanced treatment methods.

The Illinois EPA, in its commitment to public health, has also provided public guidance on ways to reduce personal exposure, including using water filters capable of removing PFAS and selecting cookware made from materials such as stainless steel or cast iron.

Due to the chemical properties of PFAS and their ability to remain in groundwater for extended periods, identifying the exact sources of contamination remains challenging.

The Illinois EPA emphasizes the importance of immediate action to ensure drinking water safety, underscoring the urgency and importance of the issue.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other related health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law’s team of experienced Firefighting Foam Lawyers for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

The growing crisis over PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” continues to unfold across multiple sectors—from defense and agriculture to science and legislation—highlighting the urgent need for global coordination, regulation, and innovation.

UK Military PFAS Leaks Raise Global Alarm

New reporting from The Guardian has revealed that at least 19 UK military bases have recorded dangerous levels of PFAS in drinking water, with some areas showing concentrations thousands of times above recommended safety limits.

The chemicals, primarily used in firefighting foams, have contaminated water at both active and former Ministry of Defence sites.

Despite years of public concern and mounting scientific evidence of health risks—including cancer and immune suppression—there has been little public disclosure or government accountability.

Communities living near the affected sites remain exposed with no clear path to cleanup or compensation

New Breakthrough in PFAS Removal from Groundwater

Amid rising contamination concerns, scientists have developed a promising nanotechnology-based filtration system capable of removing over 90% of PFAS from groundwater.

The new method, unveiled by researchers at Drexel University and the University of Pennsylvania, uses molecular nanocages that selectively trap PFAS molecules while allowing clean water to pass through.

EPA Reclassifies PFAS-Contaminated Farmland as Superfund Sites

The New York Times reports that the Environmental Protection Agency is moving to classify PFAS-contaminated farmland—especially land polluted via sewage sludge used as fertilizer—as Superfund sites.

This designation enables the federal government to take emergency action, hold polluters accountable, and provide resources for long-term cleanup.

However, the decision has triggered concern among farmers who face the prospect of having their land designated hazardous while still lacking federal compensation.

Critics argue the contamination reflects decades of regulatory failure, with the EPA and Department of Agriculture previously promoting the use of biosolids now proven to carry dangerous PFAS concentrations

Legislative Push to Ban PFAS in Firefighting Gear

In the U.S., new legislation introduced in multiple states seeks to phase out PFAS in firefighting gear, which remains a major source of occupational exposure.

The proposed bans would require manufacturers to find safer alternatives and give fire departments support in transitioning away from equipment containing toxic fluorinated compounds.

Firefighter advocacy groups have long campaigned for such reforms, citing links between PFAS exposure and elevated cancer rates among firefighters.

If passed, the legislation would mark a critical shift in both workplace safety standards and the broader movement to eliminate non-essential PFAS uses

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other related health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law’s team of experienced Firefighting Foam Lawyers for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Band-Aid maker Kenvue Inc. and its parent company, Johnson & Johnson, by a group of 20 plaintiffs who allege that the bandages contain harmful levels of PFAS.

The lawsuit, filed in New Jersey federal court, accuses the companies of failing to disclose the presence of PFAS in their products, despite knowing or being should have been aware of its inclusion.

The plaintiffs argue that PFAS are not necessary for the function of a bandage and that the chemicals may be absorbed into the skin, posing potential health risks, particularly to consumers of color who are specifically targeted by Band-Aid’s marketing.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer or other related health problems, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law’s team of experienced Firefighting Foam Lawyers for a free consultation.

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.

Concerns are growing in Harpswell, Maine, about the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly called “forever chemicals,” in local waterways.

Recent tests have shown a notable increase in contamination levels connected to firefighting foam utilized at the former Brunswick Naval Air Station, triggering calls for accountability and remediation.

PFAS levels in the headwaters of Harpswell Cove were found to be approximately 70 times higher than measurements taken two years ago, according to tests conducted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (Maine DEP) three weeks after a recent spill at Hangar 4.

Further independent testing conducted by the environmental organization Friends of Casco Bay confirmed the widespread presence of several PFAS compounds in both Brunswick and Harpswell.

The contamination has been traced to historical firefighting practices at the former naval base, where toxic foam was regularly discharged during routine equipment maintenance and fire drills.

Since then, these substances have seeped into the surrounding environment, including Picnic Pond and the creeks that flow into Harpswell Cove.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals recognized for their persistence in the environment and the human body.

Exposure is linked to potential health risks, including disruption of hormonal and immune functions.

While the complete range of health effects is still under investigation, regulatory and legal responses are growing across the country.

Local officials in Harpswell are now urging Brunswick Executive Airport to remove the remaining firefighting foam from its hangars.

They seek further investigation into the extent of contamination and long-term environmental consequences.

Legal avenues for remediation and compensation remain under review while state and federal regulators continue to monitor PFAS exposure in affected communities.

This issue contributes to the increasing national scrutiny and litigation regarding PFAS contamination, particularly in regions with a history of military or industrial activity.

EPA May Roll Back PFAS Drinking Water Standards

The Environmental Protection Agency is reportedly considering weakening its national drinking water limits on PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—raising alarm among scientists and public health advocates.

Currently, the EPA’s limit for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water is 4 parts per trillion (ppt), finalized in 2024 to reduce cancer and immune-related risks.

This potential rollback comes amid legal pressure from water utility companies and follows the agency’s decision to pause implementation of certain discharge rules.

Health experts warn that loosening PFAS limits could lead to thousands of additional cases of cancer, reproductive disorders, and developmental delays, particularly in states that lack their own regulations

Over 158 Million Americans Exposed to PFAS-Contaminated Water

New data from the EPA’s Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) reveals PFAS contamination in the drinking water of more than 158 million Americans.

Tests at 2,719 water systems across the country have confirmed the presence of one or more PFAS compounds.

In states without drinking water protections, over 53 million people are exposed to levels exceeding the EPA’s current limits.

The EPA has declared two of the most hazardous PFAS—PFOA and PFOS—as hazardous substances, unlocking $9 billion in federal funding for remediation efforts.

Despite these efforts, the EPA has yet to regulate thousands of other PFAS compounds, many of which remain in consumer products and industrial processes.

States Act as Industry Pushes Back

With limited federal oversight, states have begun passing PFAS bans targeting consumer products like cookware, carpets, and cosmetics.

New Mexico became the third state to approve legislation banning added PFAS in certain goods, though the law includes exemptions for fluoropolymers, a type of PFAS used in nonstick cookware.

The chemical industry, represented by groups like the Cookware Sustainability Alliance and the American Chemistry Council, is lobbying heavily against these laws and promoting a narrower definition of PFAS to protect product lines.

Manufacturers argue that fluoropolymers are safe and essential, while environmental advocates counter that the production and disposal of all PFAS—including fluoropolymers—pose risks throughout their life cycle.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Millions of Americans are drinking water contaminated with PFAS — toxic “forever chemicals” — as new data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reveals more than 37 million people are served by utilities that exceed the agency’s limits.

The findings come from a delayed data release amid broader EPA rollbacks and political tensions around environmental regulation.

The EPA’s monitoring program, which tests for nearly 30 types of PFAS, shows that at least 667 public water systems have recorded annual averages above the agency’s health-based limits. With testing still incomplete in many regions, that number is expected to climb.

These chemicals — commonly found in firefighting foam (AFFF), nonstick cookware, and industrial waste — do not break down naturally and have been linked to cancer, reproductive issues, and other serious health conditions.

Although the agency’s 2024 drinking water standards remain intact for now, environmental experts fear they may be rolled back under the current administration.

A subtle revision in the EPA’s most recent data summary removed key language emphasizing the health benefits of current limits, prompting concern that looser standards are being quietly prepared.

Critics argue that weakening these rules would leave tens of millions unprotected — particularly residents of states without their own PFAS limits.

Military installations, including the Department of Defense’s 400 ongoing PFAS investigations, also rely on EPA thresholds to guide cleanup and drinking water protections for surrounding communities.

The Biden-era standards require water utilities to eliminate PFAS contamination or install costly filtration systems by 2029.

If weakened, experts warn, those requirements may disappear, leaving communities exposed and allowing industrial polluters to avoid accountability.

EPA officials say their review is ongoing, but advocates urge the agency to maintain — or strengthen — protections, emphasizing the long-term health consequences of regulatory backtracking.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Despite recent deregulatory trends at the federal level, the EPA’s PFAS Reporting Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) remains fully in effect and poses significant compliance obligations for businesses.

Under a mandate from the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, the EPA finalized this rule in late 2023, requiring manufacturers and importers to report data on PFAS substances—including byproducts and impurities—dating back to 2011.

The reporting window opens on July 11, 2025, and closes on January 11, 2026, for most businesses. Smaller businesses have until July 2026 to file.

The rule includes rigorous requirements, demanding a “diligent inquiry” into the presence of PFAS across facilities and supply chains.

Businesses must review information that is “known or reasonably ascertainable,” which includes data from suppliers and customers.

This sweeping rule affects companies that may have never filed reports under TSCA and comes with the looming risk of legal exposure from PFAS-related liabilities, in addition to regulatory penalties.

While the EPA has extended comment periods for some environmental rules, PFAS requirements were not listed among the rollback targets in the agency’s March 12 deregulatory action list.

As PFAS litigation continues to grow—including AFFF, consumer goods, and water contamination lawsuits—this TSCA rule signals a need for companies to build internal PFAS compliance strategies.

The reporting process will not only fulfill legal obligations but may help businesses avoid costly surprises in future enforcement actions or litigation.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Recent testing at the Mere Creek Golf Course in Brunswick has revealed dangerous levels of PFAS contamination in a local well, raising concerns about the long-term environmental impact of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).

PFAS contamination was detected in the well at five times the safe drinking water threshold.

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is investigating the source of the contamination and has requested that the U.S. Navy conduct further assessments.

While officials have stated that the contamination predates the AFFF spill at Brunswick Airport last summer, the connection between firefighting foam use and groundwater pollution remains a critical concern.

This discovery highlights the growing body of evidence linking AFFF exposure to PFAS contamination in water sources nationwide.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The city of Fort Worth has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. military and major chemical manufacturers, including 3M, DuPont, and Raytheon (RTX Corporation), seeking over $420 million in damages for the contamination of its water supply with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals.”

The lawsuit alleges that these entities discharged PFAS into Lake Worth, a primary water source for the city, as far back as the 1970s, with ongoing contamination continuing to affect the water quality today.

Fort Worth is seeking compensation to help fund the necessary upgrades to its water filtration systems, which must now meet new federal guidelines established by the EPA in 2024.

The city argues that the responsibility for cleaning up the contamination should fall on the polluters, not the local ratepayers.

The lawsuit highlights the military’s use of firefighting foam containing high concentrations of PFAS, which was disposed of improperly at military bases, and claims that the chemical manufacturers knew about the risks of these substances since the 1950s and 1960s but failed to adequately warn the public.

Fort Worth’s legal action joins other lawsuits filed across the country as concern rises over the health risks associated with forever chemicals.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is ramping up efforts to address PFAS contamination across the state.

Working with the Department of Defense, DEP is investigating the use of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) at multiple military installations where PFOA and PFOS—two toxic “forever chemicals”—have been confirmed.

Preliminary sampling has detected contamination at various sites, with a focus on identifying and protecting drinking water sources.

However, much of the work remains in early stages, and Florida lacks enforceable PFAS limits for surface water, leaving local communities vulnerable.

Meanwhile, PFAS pollution remains a nationwide crisis.

The widespread use of these chemicals in industrial processes, firefighting foams, and consumer products has led to persistent contamination in soil, water, and even human bodies.

Exposure has been linked to cancer, birth defects, immune disorders, and reproductive issues.

Despite overwhelming evidence of harm, federal regulations remain slow to materialize.

Advocates stress that merely managing PFAS waste through landfills or incineration is not a long-term solution, as it releases additional toxins into the environment.

Instead, they argue that eliminating PFAS production at its source is the only way to prevent further exposure

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a significant update on the PFAS contamination at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, changing the status of its groundwater from “under control” to “not under control.”

This shift, notified in a December 2024 letter to base officials, follows the EPA’s introduction of new maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS chemicals in drinking water.

The change came after the detection of dangerous levels of PFAS chemicals—specifically PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS—in the base’s groundwater.

Wright-Patterson has been a designated EPA Superfund site since the 1980s due to ongoing contamination concerns. 

The base’s drinking water system, which services the surrounding community, was found to have PFAS levels above the national safety standards.

Despite these concerns, base officials have maintained that the water remains safe for consumption, although the EPA’s new classification indicates the need for ongoing cleanup efforts.

The base had previously been granted a “sitewide ready for anticipated use” (SWRAU) designation, signaling that cleanup goals had been met.

However, the new decision revokes this designation.

The Department of the Air Force has pledged to continue working with local communities and regulatory bodies to mitigate PFAS risks.

A five-year review of the environmental status at Wright-Patterson is underway, with a final report expected later this year.

Local environmental advocates, including members of Dayton’s Environmental Advisory Board, have urged the EPA to take more immediate action to address the contamination, particularly as the base continues to grapple with PFAS-related challenges in its water systems.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

On January 1, 2025, Minnesota implemented Amara’s Law, the nation’s strictest ban on the harmful chemicals known as PFAS, which are found in household products such as cookware, cleaning items, and mattresses.

The law prohibits the intentional addition of PFAS to 11 product categories and aims to phase out nearly all PFAS uses by 2032.

The legislation, named after Amara Strande, a Minnesota native who died from liver cancer caused by contaminated water, is a bold move to curb the environmental and health risks posed by these “forever chemicals.”

However, the law has sparked opposition, with some groups arguing that it violates the Commerce Clause, which protects interstate commerce.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has highlighted the financial burden of PFAS contamination, with projections suggesting taxpayers may need to spend $28 billion over the next two decades to clean up PFAS from wastewater and landfills.

Despite pushback, state officials stress that cleaning up PFAS waste isn’t enough, and proactive measures are necessary.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

After a toxic AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) spill in Brunswick last August, a Maine lawmaker introduced three bills aimed at eliminating PFAS-laden firefighting foam and addressing the concerns of residents.

The spill, which affected private wells and local water sources, sparked fears about contamination and public safety.

Rep. Dan Ankeles (D-Brunswick) introduced the legislation to ban AFFF use on properties managed by the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority and to initiate a statewide inventory and takeback program for AFFF foam.

Despite opposition to certain aspects of the proposals, including concerns over agency resources, the bills received support from local officials and environmental groups.

The proposed statewide inventory program would track AFFF stocks across Maine and start collecting data in July 2026, while a takeback program, set for 2027, aims to safely dispose of remaining foam.

The state estimates approximately 50,000 gallons of AFFF remain in Maine, and the program will be funded using general funds, with the possibility of using settlement money from ongoing lawsuits against AFFF manufacturers.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

An Arizona environmental group, the Tucson Environmental Justice Task Force, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for failing to respond to a petition submitted in November 2023, which requested the agency establish limits on the amount of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in food.

The lawsuit, filed in January 2025, calls for the FDA to set limits for PFAS substances found in food products like milk, lettuce, and fish, citing the serious health risks posed by these “forever chemicals,” which have been linked to cancer and other diseases.

The task force argues the FDA’s failure to act violates public health protections and global trade standards.

The court is being asked to compel the FDA to respond within a set time frame, as the agency has missed its 180-day legal deadline.

This lawsuit is part of the ongoing litigation surrounding PFAS exposure, which includes water contamination cases and lawsuits filed by individuals who have developed cancer and other health issues from these chemicals.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Recent reports highlight the ongoing environmental and health threats posed by PFAS contamination, with alarming findings near military bases in the U.S. and Japan, continued legal battles, and growing concerns over industrial pollution.

High PFAS Levels Detected at Brunswick Airport

Testing near Brunswick Executive Airport in Maine detected dangerously high levels of PFAS, particularly around Hangar 6.

A citizens group found PFOS levels exceeding 56,000 parts per trillion in sewer outflows—far above Maine’s drinking water limit of 20 parts per trillion.

While a third-party assessment found no leaks in the hangar’s fire suppression system, environmental advocates argue that past spills and residual contamination continue to pollute local waterways.

Legal Battle Over Military PFAS Contamination

Farmers in New Mexico are seeking justice after Cannon Air Force Base contaminated their water supply with PFAS from firefighting foam.

The contamination forced a local dairy farm to euthanize over 3,000 cows, devastating the region’s agriculture.

A critical hearing in February will determine whether the federal government can be held liable for the damage, a decision that could set a precedent for similar claims nationwide.

PFAS Found in Okinawa Waters Near U.S. Military Base

A study measuring PFAS concentrations in Okinawa, Japan, found some of the highest levels near Kadena Air Base, raising concerns that past military activities may have contributed to contamination.

The study detected PFAS at 164 parts per trillion in seawater near the base—more than triple Japan’s safety standard of 50 parts per trillion.

While the U.S. military has phased out its use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam, researchers stress the need for further studies on long-term contamination risks in the region.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

A new environmental report has revealed the highest levels of PFAS contamination ever recorded in wildlife and plants worldwide at Holloman Lake, near Alamogordo, New Mexico.

State health officials are warning that anyone who hunted or consumed wildlife from the lake between 2010 and 2024 may be at risk.

PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” have been linked to serious health issues, including kidney and testicular cancer, high cholesterol, and pregnancy-related complications.

“The levels of PFAS contamination in Holloman Lake are deeply concerning, particularly for hunters who may have consumed waterfowl from the area over the past decade,” said Dr. Miranda Durham, medical director for the New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH).

The New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) conducted the testing, highlighting the dangerous accumulation of PFAS in the local ecosystem.

These chemicals have been widely used in consumer products since the mid-20th century and persist in the environment for decades.

Officials urge anyone who may have been exposed to PFAS through Holloman Lake to consult their healthcare provider for guidance on potential health risks.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

A new federal lawsuit alleges that Chemours’ Washington Works plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia, continues to release dangerous PFAS (“forever chemicals”) into the Ohio River, despite prior legal battles and regulatory actions.

The facility, dramatized in the 2019 film Dark Waters, has long been linked to serious health and environmental damage in the area.

In 2017, more than 3,000 personal injury lawsuits filed by residents who were exposed to contaminated water in the area and subsequently developed health problems were settled for more than $670 million.

In 2023, the state of Ohio secured a $110 million settlement with DuPont for PFAS contamination stemming from the Washington Works Plant.

Key allegations of the new federal lawsuit include: 

• Violations of Discharge Limits: The lawsuit claims Chemours has exceeded PFAS discharge limits set by a 2023 consent order, polluting the Ohio River with harmful chemicals like PFOA and GenX, which the EPA has determined pose significant health risks even at very low exposure levels.
• Community Impact: Although most drinking water is filtered, the pollution allegedly prevents residents from safely using the river for recreation.
• Regulatory Inaction: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has acknowledged the violations but has yet to take further enforcement action.

The West Virginia Rivers Coalition filed the new lawsuit under the Clean Water Act, seeking to impose penalties of $66,000 per day of violation—potentially totaling $50 million—and to stop further pollution.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

A class-action lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California accuses Apple of using harmful PFAS (“forever chemicals”) in several Apple Watch bands, including the Sport Band, Ocean Band, and Nike Sport Band.

These fluoroelastomer bands allegedly contain elevated levels of PFAS, which are linked to cancer, immune suppression, and other serious health risks.

PFAS are persistent, bioaccumulative chemicals commonly used in consumer goods for their durability and resistance to sweat, oils, and lotions.

A University of Notre Dame study, cited in the lawsuit, detected high PFAS levels, specifically perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), in smartwatch bands, including products from Apple.

While Apple has committed to phasing out PFAS, the lawsuit claims the company failed to inform consumers and continues to sell these products despite available alternatives.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

A recent study published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology is the first to examine links between PFAS exposure in drinking water and various cancers.

Researchers from the University of Southern California found significant associations between PFAS exposure in drinking water and an increase in cancers affecting multiple organ systems, using data from county-level cancer incidence between 2016 and 2021.

Key findings from this landmark study include: 

• Cancer Incidence: PFAS exposure was associated with elevated rates of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cavity/pharynx cancers. Among men, links were observed with urinary, brain, leukemia, and soft tissue cancers. Women showed increased rates of thyroid, oral cavity/pharynx, and soft tissue cancers.
• Estimated Burden: The study estimates PFAS in drinking water could contribute to 4,626 to 6,864 new cancer cases annually, depending on the dataset used.
• Strongest Associations: PFBS, a type of PFAS, was most strongly linked to oral cavity/pharynx cancers, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.33.

The study relied on data from two waves of PFAS monitoring:

1. UCMR3 (2013–2015): Focused on six types of PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS.
2. UCMR5 (2023–2024): Expanded to include 29 PFAS and introduced more stringent detection thresholds.

The findings suggest that PFAS, particularly in public drinking water systems, may play a significant role in driving cancer rates, with impacts varying by chemical structure and geographic distribution.

Drinking water remains a major source of PFAS exposure, particularly in urban and industrial regions.

It is estimated that 45% of U.S. drinking water contains detectable levels of PFAS.

The study further estimates that PFAS contamination in drinking water contributes to between 4,626 and 6,864 new cancer cases annually, including cancers that have not been widely studied in relation to PFAS.

This research underscores the significance of recent policy changes, particularly the EPA’s introduction of Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for six PFAS chemicals in 2024.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Documents recently uncovered have revealed that 3M, the multibillion-dollar chemicals company, was aware that firefighting foams containing PFAS were harmful and persistent in the environment, despite assuring customers the products were biodegradable.

From the 1960s to 2003, 3M produced foams with PFOS and PFOA chemicals, known for their extreme persistence in the environment and their link to health issues like cancer, thyroid disease, and fertility problems.

3M marketed these foams as “environmentally neutral” and “biodegradable,” continuing this narrative even as evidence began to emerge in the 1940s showing that these chemicals did not biodegrade.

This misleading information resulted in widespread contamination of soil, water, and even human blood.

Though 3M has since phased out the use of PFOS and PFOA, concerns remain about other PFAS chemicals still in use today.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The fight against PFAS contamination continues to intensify with significant developments involving 3M, the U.S. military, and state governments addressing the widespread impact of these toxic chemicals.

3M Faces Insurance Challenges Amid Lawsuits

Minnesota-based 3M, already grappling with thousands of PFAS-related lawsuits, is now facing pushback from its insurer, AIG.

In a federal lawsuit, AIG claims its policies limit or exclude coverage for PFAS liabilities, leaving 3M to shoulder billions in legal costs.

3M disputes AIG’s assertions and is petitioning to move the case to federal court in South Carolina.

PFAS, often called “forever chemicals,” are linked to cancer and other health risks, intensifying scrutiny of 3M’s production and disposal practices.

U.S. Military Cleans Up PFAS in Japan

In a proactive move, the U.S. military has removed toxic firefighting foam containing PFAS from its bases in Japan ahead of schedule.

The foam, which had previously contaminated drinking water for nearly 450,000 residents near Kadena Air Base, has been replaced with safer alternatives.

The military’s shift to fluorine-free solutions protects local communities and sets an example for global efforts to reduce PFAS exposure.

New Mexico Orders Action Against Cannon Air Force Base

New Mexico’s Environment Department has taken strong action against Cannon Air Force Base following the release of 7,000 gallons of toxic foam into a damaged retention pond in August 2024.

The state has fined the base nearly $99,000 and demanded corrective measures, including a detailed inventory of PFAS-contaminated materials.

This incident follows years of PFAS contamination affecting local water supplies and livestock, with previous cases forcing a local dairy farm to euthanize over 3,000 cows.

The state has warned Cannon AFB that failure to comply could result in permit revocation.

New Study Highlights Neurotoxic Risks of PFASResearchers from the University at Buffalo have uncovered alarming findings about PFAS (forever chemicals) and their potential to harm brain health.

PFAS can cross the blood-brain barrier, accumulating in brain tissue and altering the expression of genes vital for neuronal function.

Key findings include:

• PFOA, a widely used PFAS, caused the most significant gene expression changes, disrupting pathways critical for brain development and function.
• Eleven genes were consistently affected across six PFAS compounds, potentially serving as markers for PFAS-induced neurotoxicity.
• PFAS exposure impacts biological pathways linked to oxidative stress, hypoxia signaling, and protein synthesis, all crucial for neural health.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The regulation of PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” continues to intensify with significant developments at both federal and state levels, addressing their environmental and health impacts.

Federal Action: EPA Adds Nine PFAS to Reporting List

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has added nine new PFAS compounds to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), requiring industries to track and report their use or release of these chemicals.

The nine PFAS chemicals added to the list include: 

• Ammonium perfluorodecanoate (PFDA NH4)
• Sodium perfluorodecanoate (PFDA-Na)
• Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid
• 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate acid
• 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate anion
• 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate potassium salt
• 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate ammonium salt
• 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate sodium salt
• Acetic acid, [(γ-ω-perfluoro-C8-10-alkyl)thio] derivs., Bu esters

These specific PFAS chemicals are broadly used in firefighting foams, industrial coatings, stain-resistant treatments, and the manufacture of specialty fluoropolymers for high-performance applications.

6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate acid specifically is used in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), a leading contributor to water contamination across the United States.

Facilities that meet TRI reporting thresholds must begin tracking activities involving these PFAS immediately, with reporting forms due by July 1, 2026.

This brings the total number of PFAS chemicals on the TRI list to 205.

There are more than 12,000 different types of PFAS chemicals, of which a subset of ~430 PFAS have been commercially procured by the Agency as part of a PFAS chemical library.

Minnesota Implements Nation’s Strictest PFAS Ban

Starting January 1, Minnesota’s “Amara’s Law” enforces a groundbreaking ban on PFAS in 11 product categories, including cookware, cosmetics, fabric treatments, and juvenile products like car seats and toys.

Named after Amara Strande, who advocated for PFAS regulation before succumbing to cancer linked to the chemicals, the law reflects a shift toward preventive measures rather than costly cleanups.

Minnesota already restricts PFAS in firefighting foam and food packaging, and this law will expand to ban all products with intentionally added PFAS by 2032.

EPA Under Scrutiny for Promoting Fertilizer with PFAS Risks 

New revelations show that in 2003, 3M informed the EPA of toxic PFAS contamination in sewage sludge as fertilizer, linking the chemicals to severe health risks like cancer and birth defects.

Despite this, the EPA continues to promote the practice without requiring PFAS testing, raising concerns over long-term soil contamination and public health impacts.Wastewater Plants Fail to Fully Remove PFAS

A recent study reveals that wastewater treatment plants across the U.S. are discharging significant levels of PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” into rivers and lakes, contaminating drinking water supplies for an estimated 23 million Americans.

The study highlights unregulated PFAS and pharmaceutical compounds as major contributors, which current treatment technologies cannot effectively remove.

As climate change exacerbates droughts, reduced water levels could lead to higher concentrations of these harmful chemicals in drinking water.

Experts stress the need to tackle PFAS at their source rather than relying solely on advanced treatment systems or household filters.

Why It Matters

PFAS have been linked to serious health risks, including cancers and liver damage, and their persistence in the environment makes them exceptionally challenging to eliminate.

Federal and state actions aim to curb the proliferation of these chemicals, protect public health, and drive the market toward safer alternatives.

Minnesota’s example underscores the potential for state-level leadership in addressing these pervasive pollutants.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is facing heightened scrutiny over its promotion of sewage sludge as fertilizer despite decades-old warnings about its high levels of PFAS, according to a New York Times investigation. 

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of “forever chemicals” linked to cancer, birth defects, immune suppression, and other health risks.

Key revelations from the report:

• Early Warnings Ignored: Internal studies and whistleblowers have warned the EPA since the 1990s about PFAS contamination in sewage sludge, which is commonly used as fertilizer. Chemical company 3M informed the EPA in 2003 about the presence of PFAS in U.S. sewage.

• Lack of Oversight: The EPA does not currently require testing for PFAS in sewage sludge, despite evidence that these chemicals are found in the blood of 99% of the population and in drinking water affecting millions of Americans.

• Legal Challenges: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) filed a lawsuit in June 2024, accusing the EPA of failing to fulfill its legal duty under the Clean Water Act to regulate toxic pollutants in sewage sludge. The EPA is seeking dismissal of the case, arguing that its actions are discretionary.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against chemical manufacturers 3M and DuPont, accusing them of misrepresenting the safety of PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” which have been widely used in consumer products for decades.

The lawsuit, filed in Johnson County, seeks over $1 million in damages and penalties for alleged environmental and public health harm caused by the companies’ actions.

Allegations in the Lawsuit:

• Deceptive Marketing: The lawsuit claims 3M and DuPont knowingly concealed health risks associated with PFAS for more than 50 years, continuing to market these chemicals as safe for household use.
• Health Risks: PFAS exposure has been linked to cancer, birth defects, liver damage, immune system issues, and other health problems. PFAS contamination also persists indefinitely in water, soil, and human blood.
• Widespread Contamination: Texas reports PFAS contamination in nearly 50 public water systems, surpassing the EPA’s safety limits for drinking water.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals used to make products resistant to heat, water, grease, and stains, they are found in well-known consumer products like Teflon, Scotchgard, and Stainmaster, as well as in firefighting foam.

The lawsuit follows recent reports of PFAS contamination in Johnson County, where farmers allege that fertilizer made from municipal biosolids poisoned their land and livestock.

DuPont and 3M are among the most prominent PFAS producers, and both have faced mounting litigation over their role in environmental contamination.

Environmental advocates and local officials have praised the lawsuit. Dana Ames, an environmental crime investigator in Johnson County, called the lawsuit a “significant step forward.”

Advocacy groups note that the bipartisan attention to PFAS reflects growing public demand for action against widespread contamination.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Efforts to address the widespread contamination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to intensify, with significant developments spanning regulatory proposals, health studies, and whistleblower reports.

These updates highlight growing public and governmental focus on holding polluters accountable and mitigating the effects of PFAS exposure.

Legislative Push for Accountability

Lawmakers are pressing for the inclusion of the PFAS Discharge Prevention Act in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

This legislation would require the Department of Defense to track and report PFAS discharges at military bases, ensuring stronger oversight of contamination caused by firefighting foam and other military operations.

The act represents a critical step toward protecting military families and nearby communities from PFAS exposure.

California’s Regulatory Action

California has expanded its Proposition 65 list of toxic chemicals to include several PFAS compounds.

The move requires manufacturers to provide clear warnings on products containing these substances, promoting consumer awareness and transparency.

This measure is part of a broader state effort to limit PFAS exposure through everyday items, including personal care products.

Health Risks During Pregnancy 

Emerging research reveals that PFAS in personal care products poses significant risks for pregnant individuals.

Studies have linked PFAS exposure during pregnancy to complications such as reduced birth weight and developmental delays in infants.

The findings emphasize the need for stricter regulations on cosmetic and skincare products to protect vulnerable populations.

3M Whistleblower Sheds Light on PFAS Dangers

A former 3M employee has come forward with allegations that the company withheld information about PFAS’s environmental and health risks.

The whistleblower’s testimony has prompted calls for greater corporate accountability and transparency regarding PFAS production and pollution.

Advances in Firefighting Foam Alternatives

Researchers are developing PFAS-free firefighting foams to replace the toxic formulations traditionally used in military and industrial settings.

These alternatives aim to reduce environmental contamination while maintaining the effectiveness of firefighting efforts.

Transitioning to these safer options is a key focus of current regulatory initiatives.

Toxic Water Impacting Military Families

In Northern Michigan, veterans and their families continue to grapple with the effects of PFAS-contaminated water.

Prolonged exposure has led to severe health issues, including cancer and autoimmune disorders.

Community advocates are demanding faster cleanup efforts and better support for affected families.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

PFAS chemicals, known for their persistence in the environment and links to adverse health effects, have spurred international legal actions, new research, and community responses.

Several recent developments have highlighted the need for increased scrutiny, regulation, and accountability.

Veterans and Community Health Legislation

In a landmark move, the Veterans Exposed to Toxic Substances (VETS) Act aims to support veterans and their families impacted by PFAS exposure.

Introduced in Florida, the legislation mandates enhanced medical services and hospital care, especially targeting former military personnel exposed to PFAS through firefighting foam and other military materials.

New Research on Health Impacts

Emerging studies on PFAS continue to reveal troubling links between these chemicals and various health issues:

• • Gut and Kidney Health: A recent study involving young adults has connected PFAS exposure to kidney damage and gut health disruptions, conditions with potential long-term impacts on the immune system and overall health.
  • Chemical Detection in Water: Following a spill in Brunswick, Maine, scientists launched investigations to understand PFAS concentration levels in the local water supply. This spill has raised alarms about the risks posed by accidental releases and the chemical’s potential for groundwater contamination.
  • Widespread Screening Efforts: Community-driven initiatives in Maine are calling for extensive PFAS screenings to identify contamination hotspots, aiming to prevent exposure and safeguard public health.

• Health Risks in Personal Care Products: Recent research from Brown University reveals that PFAS chemicals are present in personal care items, including cosmetics, sunscreens, and lotions. These products expose users to PFAS through skin absorption, raising concerns over potential health effects and highlighting the need for regulatory oversight in product manufacturing.

Legal Actions, Accountability, and Awareness efforts.

As awareness grows around the dangers of PFAS, legal actions are intensifying:

• • Northwest Georgia Lawsuits: A series of lawsuits involving PFAS contamination are progressing in Northwest Georgia, where residents claim that companies knowingly polluted local water sources with PFAS, endangering community health.
  • Grumman Cleanup: In Calverton, New York, Grumman has committed to PFAS cleanup efforts in response to public outcry over contamination that has affected the local water supply. This step represents one of several corporate cleanups aimed at addressing PFAS damage and restoring safe water access.

• Local Monitoring and Awareness Efforts: In Minnesota, scientists and environmental advocates are actively monitoring PFAS in drinking water, air, and soil. Partnering with local governments, these groups are enhancing public awareness and enabling communities to track contamination levels directly, promoting informed health decisions.

Military and Government Cleanups

Federal and state agencies continue to face mounting pressure to tackle PFAS contamination from military sites:

• Arizona’s PFAS Cleanup: The U.S. Air Force has initiated cleanups in Arizona to mitigate PFAS exposure from military operations, specifically targeting contaminated water near air force bases. Local leaders are demanding more comprehensive cleanup efforts, urging the military to accelerate its response to PFAS pollution.
• Rain and Groundwater: In Miami, researchers have found that PFAS is now present in rainfall, heightening concerns about contamination through multiple exposure routes, from drinking water to everyday activities.

Regulatory Actions and PFAS in Food 

• • Stricter Regulations: Washington State has introduced stricter regulations targeting PFAS use in food packaging to limit chemical migration into food items. These measures reflect a growing regulatory push across states to restrict PFAS use in consumer products and prevent further health risks associated with exposure through food.

• Contamination in the U.S. Food Supply: Studies have shown PFAS contamination in the U.S. food supply, likely due to industrial waste impacting water and soil used in agriculture. This contamination pathway underscores the urgency for stricter regulations to safeguard public health from PFAS exposure through everyday food consumption.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” continue to raise serious environmental and health concerns across the United States.

From lawsuits against companies for local water contamination to troubling discoveries of PFAS in everyday products, these chemicals are linked to various health risks and persist in both natural and urban environments.

Recent studies and legal actions underscore the urgent need for regulatory reform and highlight the ways PFAS are impacting communities nationwide.

Here’s a look at the latest developments in PFAS regulation, research findings, and ongoing legal efforts.

Michigan Sues Over PFAS Contamination in White Pigeon River

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has filed a lawsuit against Ox Paperboard, alleging that the company has discharged PFAS-laden wastewater into the White Pigeon River, contaminating local water sources.

The suit demands the closure of wastewater lagoons on Ox Paperboard’s property and an end to any further unauthorized discharges.

According to the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), the company has previously received multiple violation notices for PFAS contamination since opening its St. Joseph County mill in 2020.

New Research Shows Increased Toxicity from PFAS Mixtures

A study by the University of Buffalo and Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research reveals that exposure to PFAS mixtures is more toxic than exposure to individual PFAS compounds.

Researchers noted an additive toxicity effect, which indicates that when different PFAS compounds are present together, their combined impact could exceed safe limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) even if individual compounds are within limits.

This finding underscores the need to regulate PFAS as mixtures rather than isolated chemicals.

Military Sets Its Own PFAS Cleanup Standard, Sparking Controversy

In a recent meeting, Navy representatives informed Riverhead, NY, residents that the Department of Defense (DOD) will follow a PFAS contamination standard of 12 parts per trillion (ppt) for cleanup efforts at the former Grumman site.

This threshold is three times the EPA’s recommended limit of 4 ppt, sparking concerns from community members who argue that the DOD’s “action level” doesn’t align with scientifically-backed health standards.

Community members voiced concerns that the DOD’s lenient threshold could leave local water sources contaminated.

PFAS in Consumer Products: California Sues Over Toxic Menstrual Pads

In California, a lawsuit has been filed against Edgewell, the parent company of Carefree, alleging that the brand’s menstrual pads contain harmful PFAS chemicals.

Representing the Ecological Alliance, attorneys argue that exposure to PFAS in this product could pose serious reproductive health risks, including hormonal disruption and immune system toxicity.

The suit seeks either the removal of PFAS from these products or a clear warning label on their packaging.

Indiana Discontinues PFAS Disposal Program for Firefighting Foam

Indiana’s program for collecting and disposing of PFAS-laden firefighting foam is set to end on December 30, leaving the state without a designated disposal method.

The Indiana Department of Homeland Security cites funding constraints as the reason behind the program’s discontinuation, even as PFAS exposure remains a documented health risk for firefighters and communities near fire training sites.

Fire departments in Indiana are encouraged to sign up for the collection program before the end-of-year deadline.

PFAS Detected in Miami Rainwater, Highlighting Global Spread

Florida International University researchers recently published a study showing significant levels of PFAS in Miami’s rainwater, suggesting that these chemicals can travel through the atmosphere and re-enter the environment.

The study found that PFAS concentrations increased during Miami’s dry season, which coincides with northeasterly winds.

This pattern indicates that PFAS-laden particles from northern manufacturing areas are likely reaching Miami through air currents.

The study’s findings underscore PFAS as a global environmental challenge that demands international regulatory solutions.

A recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has revealed that approximately 20% of Americans are consuming drinking water contaminated with PFAS.

PFAS, used extensively in consumer products and industrial applications, resist natural degradation and have been linked to a range of serious health issues, including cancers, immune system dysfunction, and reproductive harm, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. 

The issue extends beyond just tap water.

Another recent study discovered that 99% of bottled water brands contain PFAS, presenting limited options for consumers seeking safer alternatives.

PFAS contamination is especially prevalent at and around military sites, largely due to firefighting foam used on bases.

Communities near sites like New York’s Seneca Army Depot, where PFAS has leaked into local water sources such as Seneca Lake, are pushing for swift remediation to protect their water supplies.

On the regulatory front, the Air Force recently reached an agreement with the EPA to address PFAS contamination in Arizona, a significant step after prolonged community advocacy.

This new cleanup commitment could serve as a model for other affected areas, like in the state of Michigan, where state leaders are urging the federal government to expedite PFAS remediation at several military facilities.

As efforts to contain PFAS contamination continue, new challenges arise with disposal practices.

The increasing use of incineration to dispose of PFAS waste has raised concerns about potential air pollution, as incineration might release PFAS byproducts into the atmosphere, posing additional health risks and prompting calls for more stringent EPA guidelines.

In response to mounting data on PFAS exposure risks, advocacy groups like the Environmental Working Group (EWG) continue to push for stricter regulatory action and public health protections.

With heightened attention on these chemicals, recent studies and regulatory moves underscore the urgent need for comprehensive PFAS management strategies to mitigate risks to American water supplies and public health.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

In recent months, the regulatory landscape and legal battles surrounding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called “forever chemicals,” have intensified, with significant developments across the United States and internationally.

PFAS are chemicals known for their persistence in the environment and potential health risks, including cancer, kidney damage, and immune system effects.

Legal Actions & Settlements 

• Carrier Corporation has agreed to pay $615 million to settle claims related to its subsidiary, Kidde-Fenwal, over the use of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a PFAS-containing firefighting foam.
• A class-action lawsuit against Perdue Agribusiness in Salisbury, Maryland accuses the company of contaminating land with PFAS chemicals through its handling of fertilizer and biosolids.

Regulatory Moves & Disputes

• Michigan has reignited its dispute with the U.S. Air Force over the cleanup of PFAS contamination at Wurtsmith Air Force Base

The State alleges that the military has delayed its cleanup efforts, exacerbating the contamination of surrounding communities’ water sources.

Congressional leaders from Michigan are calling for urgent action, citing health risks and environmental damage.

• In Europe, the cost of addressing PFAS contamination is rising sharply with industry experts estimating that the price tag for cleaning up PFAS-contaminated sites could reach as much as €17 billion in Germany alone.

Regulatory bodies across Europe are pushing for stricter regulations, highlighting the need for immediate action to address widespread contamination.

New Research & Findings

• A groundbreaking study has detected PFAS chemicals in bottled and tap water from several countries, including the U.S. and the U.K.
  • The research emphasizes the pervasive nature of PFAS contamination, even in what is typically regarded as safe drinking water.
• Another study has linked PFAS exposure to sleep disorder, revealing that higher levels of these chemicals in the bloodstream correlate with poor sleep quality and increased likelihood of conditions like insomnia and sleep apnea.
• Emerging research from researchers involved in the Southern California Children’s Health Study points to kidney damage and gut health imbalance as newly identified health risks associated with PFAS exposure.

Military & Water Treatment Efforts

• At Ansbach Army Base, a new water purification system has been installed to ensure that drinking water for soldiers and personnel is free of PFAS. This move is part of a broader initiative by the U.S. military to tackle PFAS pollution at its bases worldwide.
• In response to ongoing contamination concerns, Michigan Congressional leaders have renewed their calls for the federal government to increase funding and resources to expedite PFAS cleanups at military sites across the state. Michigan officials argue that delays in remediation are endangering public health and the environment.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products (such as AFFF firefighting foam), you may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The ongoing battle against per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” has seen significant advancements across multiple fronts, from regulatory actions to research findings and legal measures.

PFAS, notorious for their persistence in the environment and their links to health issues, continue to be a major focus for both lawmakers and scientists.

Regulatory Moves and Cleanup Initiatives

• The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has ramped up efforts to monitor PFAS, calling for more stringent reporting of environmental releases of the chemicals. This move is aimed at increasing transparency and accountability from industries that contribute to PFAS pollution.
• Massachusetts secured $535 million in funding to address PFAS and lead contamination in drinking water supplies. This state-led initiative will fund water treatment systems and expand testing to protect communities from harmful exposure.
• The city of Athens, Georgia, has also reported new findings of PFAS contamination in local well water, urging a closer look at environmental and health impacts in the region.

Legal Actions

Legal battles over PFAS contamination continue to unfold across the United States.

Residents in Toms Way, Massachusetts, have filed lawsuits against companies responsible for PFAS pollution, claiming “staggering levels” of contamination in their water supply.

This case mirrors similar lawsuits nationwide, where communities seek compensation for health risks and environmental damage linked to PFAS exposure.

Scientific Research and New Findings

Researchers have been intensifying their efforts to understand the full scope of PFAS’ impact on human health and the environment:

• A team at UMass Amherst has secured a $5 million federal grant to study the effects of PFAS on bone density, highlighting growing concerns over long-term health risks, such as skeletal deterioration.
• New Mexico’s Cannon Air Force Base is currently investigating soil contamination after PFAS were dumped into a nearby pond, raising alarms about contamination spreading through military operations.
• In the Arctic, researchers have discovered that migrating seabirds are introducing PFAS into remote ecosystems, underscoring the global nature of the contamination.
• In an important scientific breakthrough, new technology has detected previously undetected airborne PFAS, prompting further research into their presence in the atmosphere and potential human exposure pathways.
• Indiana University and the EPA have launched a $7 million research project focused on toxic chemical contamination, including PFAS, in the Great Lakes, signaling a large-scale effort to assess and mitigate pollution in one of the nation’s largest freshwater systems.

These recent actions demonstrate that the issue of PFAS is far from resolved.

As regulatory bodies tighten restrictions and researchers uncover more about the extent of PFAS pollution, affected communities continue to pursue legal remedies.

With ongoing advancements in detection technologies and scientific understanding, the battle against “forever chemicals” continues to be a pivotal environmental and legal issue for years to come.

Our law firm is currently investigating personal injury cases from individuals who have suffered health issues after consuming PFAS-contaminated water, specifically near US Military bases. 

If you have developed cancer or other serious health problems due to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation. 

The EPA has extended the reporting deadline for PFAS data under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8 (a)(7), moving the start date from November 2024 to July 2025 due to budgetary constraints and delays in developing the necessary data collection software.

This rule mandates that manufacturers, including importers, report detailed information on PFAS usage, chemical identities, production volumes, and exposure risks, creating the largest-ever dataset on these persistent “forever chemicals.”

PFAS, widely used in industries like defense, construction, and electronics, are linked to severe health problems, including cancer and immune system damage.

The data collected will play a vital role in helping the EPA, public health advocates, and environmental groups better regulate these chemicals and protect communities from their harmful effects.

While environmental groups like the Environmental Working Group (EWG) express urgency, some industries are relieved by the extra time to comply with the extensive reporting requirements.

The reporting window will now open on July 11, 2025, with most companies required to submit by January 2026, while small businesses importing PFAS-containing articles have until July 2026 to file their data.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” have become a national environmental crisis, affecting military bases, industries, and local communities.

The U.S. military is now facing increased scrutiny for its role in widespread PFAS contamination, particularly from the use of PFAS-laden firefighting foam at over 578 military bases.

These chemicals have been linked to numerous health problems, including cancers, immune system damage, and pregnancy-related issues.

Despite this, the military has been slow to begin cleanup, planning to address only the most heavily contaminated sites first.

As of now, only 55 of the affected bases meet the threshold for cleanup, a strategy that has drawn criticism from environmentalists for not addressing the full scope of contamination.

In response to this slow pace, several states have taken legal action against the Department of Defense (DoD), seeking financial responsibility for the environmental damage caused by PFAS contamination seeping into local groundwater and soil.

With more than 27 states filing lawsuits, the legal battle mirrors the multi-billion-dollar settlements reached with private companies like 3M and DuPont earlier this year.

In a similar situation, Wolverine Worldwide, a footwear manufacturer, has also been held accountable for PFAS contamination in Kent County, Michigan.

After years of delays, the company has begun installing remediation systems at its former tannery and dumpsite in Rockford.

These efforts are crucial, as PFAS pollution from the company has affected local water supplies, leading to public outcry and legal challenges.

Wolverine’s cleanup mirrors the broader PFAS issue, as both the military and private industries face increasing pressure to address the contamination they’ve caused.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are ramping up efforts to address the impacts of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of toxic chemicals found in military environments.

Both agencies have initiated significant steps to mitigate risks related to PFAS exposure and provide support to those affected.

In April 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established new national drinking water standards for PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).

The DoD has committed to integrating these standards into its ongoing PFAS cleanup initiatives under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

As of March 2024, the DoD has completed preliminary site inspections for PFAS at 710 military installations and identified over 350 sites requiring further investigation.

To expedite action, the DoD plans to prioritize addressing drinking water wells with the highest PFAS concentrations, especially at installations where interim actions are already underway.

The DoD aims to take rapid steps to reduce PFAS contamination, with a focus on sustainable solutions like connecting impacted homes to public water systems or installing water treatment systems.

The goal is to ensure compliance with the EPA’s PFAS standards by April 2029.

Addionally, the VA announced on September 25, 2024, that it will conduct a scientific assessment to explore a potential link between PFAS exposure during military service and kidney cancer.

This review is part of the Biden-Harris administration’s broader effort to expand benefits for toxic-exposed veterans, in line with the PACT Act and the Biden Cancer Moonshot initiative.

If kidney cancer is found to be a service-connected condition, veterans exposed to PFAS would not need to prove a direct link between their service and the disease to receive benefits.

The VA has already extended presumptions for over 300 conditions, including various cancers and hypertension.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

PFAS contamination continues to pose significant risks to public health and the environment, with recent reports underscoring its widespread presence.

In Westminster, Massachusetts, a newly filed class action lawsuit alleges that several companies knowingly dumped PFAS-laden materials at a local composting facility, resulting in severe contamination of wells and soil.

Residents in the area, whose well water far exceeded safe PFAS levels, are now seeking compensation for the damage to their health and property.

This case is unique as it utilizes the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act to allege fraud and deliberate misconduct by the companies involved.

In Maine, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is conducting extensive testing following an AFFF firefighting foam release in August 2024.

Preliminary results show that while PFAS concentration in some surface waters and soils are declining, levels in certain areas remain elevated.

Testing and remediation efforts continue, with the DEP advising residents to avoid recreational activities in the affected waters until further evaluations are completed.

Nationally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun to address the risks of PFAS in drinking water, implementing new regulations that will take effect by 2029.

However, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that 77% of public water systems have yet to fully implement treatment methods to remove PFAS.

Even those that have adopted treatment systems, such as granular activated carbon, face challenges in managing the contaminated waste produced during the process.

To avoid PFAS exposure, individuals should stay informed about their local water quality and opt for bottled water or home filtration systems if PFAS contamination is suspected.

The GAO recommends that public water systems provide clearer communication to residents about the risks of PFAS and proper disposal methods for PFAS-contaminated waste.

By staying proactive and ensuring the right water treatment methods are in place, communities can better protect themselves from the long-term health effects of these hazardous chemicals.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The issue of PFAS contamination continues to escalate as states, environmental groups, and scientists push for broader regulation of these “forever chemicals.”

Last month, one of the largest accidental spills of PFAS occurred at the former Brunswick naval air station in Maine, where 51,000 gallons of PFAS-laden firefighting foam leaked into nearby water sources.

Despite astronomical contamination levels, state officials were slow to respond and provided incomplete information to the public.

Advocates suspect an effort to downplay the scale of the spill, citing problematic data reporting that obscured the true extent of the contamination.

Public health officials are now calling for comprehensive water testing and faster removal of PFAS-laden foam from military bases.

Meanwhile, researchers are focusing on a lesser-known, yet widespread, form of PFAS called trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

While TFA is not currently regulated, its environmental presence is concerning.

The substance is difficult to remove from water and could pose significant risks if further studies confirm its toxicity.

Researchers warn that addressing TFA contamination will be expensive and difficult, as current filtration systems cannot handle the small, mobile chemical.

This emerging focus on TFA highlights the broader “whack-a-mole” problem of managing forever chemicals—while efforts to regulate older PFAS compounds are underway, newer forms continue to surface.

In a related development, North Carolina, New Mexico, and New Jersey have formally petitioned the EPA to regulate four types of PFAS as hazardous air pollutants.

These states argue that PFAS contamination is not limited to water but can also be transmitted through the air, citing high levels of emissions from production plants.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

In Brunswick, Maine, local officials passed a resolution urging immediate action after a recent spill of 1,450 gallons of firefighting foam containing PFAS at the Brunswick Executive Airport.

At the Brunswick Executive Airport, a Hangar 4’s fire suppression system discharged, filling the hangar and three aircraft inside with up to 5 feet of firefighting foam.

This foam then seeped out into nearby ponds and waterways.

The town council has called for the removal of PFAS-laden firefighting foam from airport hangars, citing previous incidents and existing contamination linked to the site’s history as a former naval base.

The incident adds to the broader narrative of PFAS contamination throughout the US and the urgency for immediate action.

Recent scientific research has uncovered new insights into the health risks posed by PFAS.

A study on zebrafish revealed that exposure to PFAS during early developmental stages causes hyperactivity, linked to changes in certain genes associated with brain development.

These findings raise concerns about potential neurodevelopmental impacts in humans, as the genes affected in zebrafish are also present in humans.

Additionally, a University of Kentucky study identified a possible connection between long-term PFOS exposure and an increased risk of colorectal cancer, adding to the list of cancers linked to PFAS exposure.

This study found that PFOS alters intestinal cells in ways that could encourage cancer development, particularly in communities with high levels of PFAS contamination.

At the federal level, the Biden-Harris administration has prioritized addressing PFAS pollution, releasing a new strategy for federal research aimed at reducing and preventing PFAS contamination.

This initiative focuses on providing actionable data, improving communication with affected communities, and exploring remediation technologies.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Recent reports have raised significant concerns about the widespread contamination of American farmland by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

For decades, municipal sewage, treated and repurposed as fertilizer, has been spread across millions of acres of farmland, under federal encouragement, due to its nutrient-rich content.

However, emerging research indicates that this practice has introduced high levels of PFAS into the soil, with potential health risks for both humans and livestock.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals used in various industrial and consumer products, including nonstick cookware, firefighting foam, and water-resistant fabrics, these substances are known for their resistance to breaking down, leading to their accumulation in the environment and in human and animal bodies.

PFAS exposure has been linked to an increased risk of certain cancers, birth defects, and developmental issues in children.

Farmers across the country, particularly in states like Texas, Michigan, Maine, New York, and Tennessee, are beginning to realize the extent of this contamination.

In some cases, PFAS have been detected at high levels on farmland, with reports of the chemicals affecting livestock health and contaminating produce.

In response to the contamination, several lawsuits have been filed against the suppliers of the sewage-based fertilizer and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The lawsuits allege that the EPA failed to adequately regulate the presence of PFAS in these fertilizers, thereby allowing the contamination to spread unchecked across the nation’s farmlands.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products like AFFF firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has signed a new law that aims to phase out the use of PFAS chemicals in firefighters’ protective gear.

PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are industrial compounds widely known for their water and stain-resistant properties but have been linked to severe health risks, including various types of cancer.

The legislation, effective January 2025, will require manufacturers and sellers of firefighting gear to disclose the presence of PFAS and provide a reason for its use.

By 2027, the sale of gear containing intentionally-added PFAS will be banned in the state.

This law highlights the growing concern over the health implications of PFAS, which are often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.

Firefighters, who are frequently exposed to PFAS through their gear and firefighting foam, face a heightened risk of developing cancers such as kidney, testicular, and breast cancer.

The regulation is part of a broader movement to address PFAS contamination across various industries.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also proposed limits on PFAS in drinking water, reflecting increasing federal and state efforts to mitigate the dangers posed by these chemicals.

The impact of Massachusetts’ law could extend beyond firefighting equipment, influencing ongoing PFAS-related litigations and prompting other states to adopt similar measures.

The focus on eliminating PFAS from everyday products, including clothing, cookware, and personal care items, aligns with the growing legal and regulatory scrutiny of these toxic substances.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products like AFFF firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiated a new project to test drinking water near U.S. Army bases for contamination by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals.”

These substances have been linked to increased risks of cancer and other serious health issues.

The testing will begin at nine Army installations but is expected to expand to 235 locations nationwide.

PFAS contamination has been a significant concern, particularly near military bases where aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS was used extensively to combat fuel fires.

This foam has been identified as a major source of PFAS contamination in water supplies, posing health risks to military personnel, their families, and nearby communities.

The affected military bases in the initial testing phase include Fort Novosel in Alabama, Fort Hunter Liggett in California, and Fort Stewart in Georgia, among others.

The EPA has set new, legally enforceable drinking water limits for PFAS, and this project aims to determine whether the water near these bases meets the new standards.

If PFAS levels exceed the Maximum Contaminant Levels established, the Army and environmental regulators will work with state officials to address the contamination.

This initiative is part of a broader legal landscape surrounding PFAS contamination.

Aqueous film-forming foam lawsuits have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in South Carolina for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

These cases involve allegations that exposure to PFAS-containing AFFF firefighting foam used at military bases, airports, and firefighting training centers have led to severe health issues, including various forms of cancer.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

We are also accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

States across the nation are increasingly taking action against harmful chemicals known as “PFAS,” which have been found in drinking water, rivers, and lakes.

These chemicals, also known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, are linked to serious health risks, including cancer and developmental issues.

States taking action include:

• North Carolina A report from the Environmental Working Group reveals that drinking water for 2.5 million North Carolinians is contaminated with PFAS, surpassing the EPA’s new safety standards.
• Pennsylvania Water Systems Exceed Standards Testing in Pennsylvania shows that nearly 19% of water systems contain PFAS levels above the new EPA regulations. The highest contamination was found in smaller communities and mobile home parks, with some levels far exceeding federal limits.
• Contamination in Massachusetts Water Recent EPA data indicate that drinking water in Eastern Massachusetts contains PFAS levels above the proposed federal limits. The contamination affects numerous water systems across the state, highlighting the widespread presence of these “forever chemicals” in public water supplies.
• PFAS Widespread in New Jersey The latest EPA data show widespread PFAS contamination in New Jersey’s public water systems. The contamination is concentrated in North Jersey but is present statewide.
• Wisconsin Rivers and Lakes A study by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that PFAS levels in natural foam on rivers and lakes are significantly higher than in the water itself, sometimes up to 7,000 times higher.
• Minnesota Proposes PFAS Water Pollution Permits The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has proposed a new water pollution permit for 3M’s Cottage Grove plant, which continues to manufacture PFAS. The permit mandates advanced water treatment to remove PFAS to undetectable levels.
• WVU Researchers Identify PFAS Hot Spots in U.S. Researchers from West Virginia University have identified several PFAS contamination hot spots in the U.S., primarily in densely populated and industrialized areas. The study found that communities relying on groundwater are particularly vulnerable.

Additionally, a report by Milliman estimates that the cost to remediate PFAS contamination in U.S. water systems could reach up to $175 billion.

The report also notes the challenges insurers face in quantifying potential liabilities related to PFAS exposure and remediation.

The EPA and U.S. Army has also launched a joint project to test water near Army installations for PFAS contamination, with the initial phase targeting nine priority sites, with the potential for expansion.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Groundbreaking research reveals that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can seep through human skin and enter the bloodstream.

PFAS absorption through the skin challenges the previous understanding that these chemicals primarily entered the body through contaminated food, water, and air.

The study used cultured human skin models to examine the absorption potential of 17 commonly used PFAS compounds.

Shorten carbon-chained compounds showed higher absorption percentages into the bloodstream than longer-chained compounds.

PFAS have been linked to various health issues, including cancer, infertility, high cholesterol, low birth weights, and adverse effects on the liver, thyroid, and immune system.

The study’s findings raise concerns about routine exposure to PFAS through products that come into direct contact with the skin, such as cosmetics, water-repellent clothing, and hand sanitizers.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently set its first-ever limit on PFAS in drinking water, reflecting growing awareness and regulatory action against these chemicals.

Currently, only eight states have enacted policies to restrict PFAS in personal care products.

Consumers can reduce their PFAS exposure by:

• Choosing PFAS-free personal care beauty products.
• Supporting policies that limit PFAS in consumer goods can drive broader changes to protect public health and the environment.
• Avoiding products with PFAS, such as certain cosmetics and water-repellent clothing.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Recent reports indicate that toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) continue to persist in the groundwater around the Ōhakea airforce base, with levels rising in some areas.

PFAS, used in firefighting foam, were first discovered by the Defence Force in local drinking water supplies in 2017.

PFAS are known to persist in the environment and the human body for centuries, potentially increasing the risk of cancers, raising cholesterol levels, impairing immunity, and delaying children’s development.

Regular testing around Ōhakea has detected PFAS in seven bores, with concentrations in some areas exceeding drinking water standards by 2-3 times.

In response to the contamination, bottled water was provided from 2018, and a $12 million piped water scheme was opened in 2022.

This situation parallels similar contamination issues at other military bases globally, including Devonport and Whenuapai.

The Air Force is ramping up efforts to address PFAS contamination following the implementation of new federal guidelines by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The new standards, introduced in April, set stricter limits on PFAS exposure in drinking water.

The Air Force has acknowledged that these chemicals, used in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) for firefighting, have contaminated water supplies on and around military bases.

The Air Force has found PFAS contamination at 191 out of 204 inspected installations since 2015. 

If PFAS levels exceed the action threshold due to Department of Defense activities, measures such as connecting residences to municipal water supplies or installing filtration systems will be implemented.

The Air Force is also investigating other sources of PFAS contamination at active and closed installations, in collaboration with the Department of Defense.

Cleanup efforts are prioritized at locations posing the greatest risk to human health, with ongoing coordination with regulatory agencies and affected communities.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Edwardsville, IL (TorHoerman Law’s primary office location) and Glen Carbon, IL, are actively responding to new regulations set on July 10, 2024, in which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandated new regulations to limit PFAS chemicals in drinking water.

Known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, PFAS are linked to serious health risks, including endocrine disruption, hormone production and transport, and various cancers.

The EPA’s directive will cost municipalities nationwide an estimated $1.5 billion annually to monitor and control PFAS levels.

During a July 25 board meeting, Glen Carbon’s trustees decided to retain several law firms to address PFAS contamination.

This decision follows the EPA’s April ruling that established legally enforceable drinking water standards for PFAS.

In Edwardsville, water samples taken since 2021 have detected PFAS, with PFOA levels recorded at 0.0055 parts per billion.

City Engineer Ryan Zwijack confirmed that Edwardsville’s current water treatment facilities cannot remove PFAS, but the city will adhere to EPA and Illinois EPA guidance on future sampling and treatment.

Glen Carbon, which buys treated water from Illinois American Water, is also affected.

The company plans to invest over $40 million to upgrade its water treatment facility in Granite City, monitoring PFAS levels closely.

Both towns plan to construct new water treatment facilities to meet the EPA’s new maximum contaminant levels.

Municipalities like Glen Carbon and Edwardsville are joining other cities in filing claims against PFAS manufacturers. 

This legal strategy aims to hold the manufacturers accountable for contamination and the subsequent health impacts.

According to Matthew Maas, director of the SIUE Environmental Resources Training Center, advancements in testing technology will likely reveal PFAS in more locations.

This ongoing battle against “forever chemicals” highlights the progress made in water safety, focusing now on long-term, chronic health effects rather than acute health threats.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) is making great strides in improving drinking water safety by tackling PFAS contamination.

PFAS, often called “forever chemicals,” can cause serious health problems, including issues with development, the immune system, and cancer.

Traditional methods to struggle to remove these chemicals, especially the short-chain types.

NJIT, led by Associate Professor Arjun Venkatesan, has developed a new pre-treatment process that enhances existing water filters.

By adding a special chemical to the water, this process helps remove both short-chain and long-chain PFAS more effectively.

The Suffolk County Water Authority has supported this research by providing a testing site with additional resources.

Early results are promising, showing a 170% improvement in removing harmful short-chain PFAS.

This new method is cost-effective and easy to integrate into current water treatment systems, potentially reducing maintenance costs by 50%.

NJIT’s approach aligns with the latest EPA regulations, aiming to improve water quality nationwide.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Recent research conducted by environmental chemists from the University of Birmingham reveals that per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” can be absorbed through human skin.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals found in various consumer products, including skincare items, cosmetics, and waterproof clothing.

Known for their persistence in the environment and the human body, these chemicals pose significant health risks.

The study found that many of these compounds could indeed be absorbed through the skin, challenging previous assumptions about the skin acting as a barrier.

The study reported that daily contact with products containing PFAS could lead to substantial exposure over time.

Once absorbed, PFAS can disrupt hormone systems, lower immune responses to childhood vaccinations, reduce birth weights, and alter liver function.

Notably, PFOA has been designated as “carcinogenic to humans” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Many lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers for the widespread contamination and health impacts associated with PFAS exposure.

Regulatory bodies, particularly in the European Union, have already begun regulating certain PFAS in drinking water.

This study’s findings underscore the need for manufacturers and regulators to reassess the risks associated with PFAS, especially those with shorter chain lengths that might be more easily absorbed through the skin

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The California State Water Resources Control Board recently issued a report alerting nearly one million Californians about water sourced from failing systems at the start of this year.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has imposed new requirements for per- and poly-fluoralkyl substances (PFAS), which are man-made chemicals found in everyday items.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” pose significant health risks due to their persistence in the environment and human body.

As of January 1, 385 public water systems in California are considered failing.

These systems primarily serve small, rural communities, with many relying on bottle d water and boiled water advisories.

These affected areas include:

• Kern County: 60 systems
• Tulare County: 32 systems
• Fresno County: 31 systems
• Madera County: 28 systems.

The report highlights that 50% of the communities served by failing systems are communities of color.

Additionally, these systems are more likely to serve disadvantaged communities compared to those that have been removed from the failing list.

Providing clean water to the affected communities is estimated to cost $11.5 billion.

The State Water Resources Control Board has proposed distributing $855 million in financial assistance over the next year to address drinking water needs in disadvantaged communities and emerging contaminants.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States.

Recent court cases across Europe underline significant gaps in the regulatory framework governing per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS), often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ due to their persistence in the environment.

Despite the widespread use and environmental impact of PFAS, particularly in products like firefighting foams, current laws are insufficiently equipped to manage their risks effectively.

In Denmark and Sweden, legal actions have underscored the health risks and environmental contamination associated with PFAS.

In Korsør, Denmark, PFAS contamination from a firefighting training site compromised the quality of meat from a local community farm, with detected levels high enough to impair immune responses in residents, including children.

Similarly, in Sweden, the Swedish Armed Forces faced legal repercussions for contaminating municipal water supplies with PFAS, leading to significant remediation costs covered by tax and water fees.

The existing legal structures allow for the continued use and disposal of PFAS without adequate oversight of their long-term environmental and health impacts.

This has led to widespread contamination, with over 23,000 PFAS-contaminated sites identified in Europe alone.

The call for a more stringent regulatory approach is growing louder. Experts advocate for a global ban on PFAS chemicals and a shift towards more sustainable alternatives.

The European Union, following a Swedish initiative, has banned 200 PFAS compounds; however, this represents just a fraction of the over 15,000 PFAS substances currently in use.

Legal reforms are urgently needed to prevent further pollution and ensure that manufacturers and other polluters bear the costs of environmental cleanup and health impacts.

This includes retrospective liability for past contamination and more cautious approval processes for new chemicals.

The ongoing PFAS lawsuits not only seek to address specific instances of contamination but also push for systemic changes to prevent future harm.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Consumers and public water systems have recently filed class action lawsuits against several companies, including RiseWell LLC, Bic USA Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Kenvue Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, and Chemguard Inc.

These lawsuits allege the companies either contaminated public water systems with per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) or manufactured products containing “forever chemicals.”

Class Action Key Details:

• A class action lawsuit claims that RiseWell’s children’s toothpaste contains harmful PFAS, despite advertising the product as natural and chemical-free.
• Bic is accused of failing to disclose that its razors contain PFAS.
  • The lawsuit highlights that Bic informed the Maine Department of Environmental Protection about the intentional use of PFAS in its products. The plaintiffs argue that PFAS are unsafe and pose a health risk.
• These companies face a lawsuit over allegations that their Band-Aid products contain dangerous PFAS, the lawsuit claims the presence of PFAS renders the products unfit for their intended use and poses a health risk.
• Public water systems have sued Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard Inc.
  • The lawsuit accuses the companies of prioritizing profits over human health and the environment.

Continuing Developments:

• BASF agreed to pay $316.5 million to settle claims that it contaminated public drinking water systems with PFAS.
  • The settlement covers public water systems that detected PFAS before May 15, 2024. BASF will make an initial payment of $4 million by July 15, 2024, and the remaining $312.5 million by March 1, 2025.
• The EPA has finalized the first-ever regulations for PFAS in drinking water.
  • Public drinking water systems have three years to complete initial monitoring for PFAS and five years to implement the new regulations.
  • By 2027, public water systems must begin informing the public about PFAS levels in their drinking water.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The Air Force is implementing new techniques to address PFAS contamination at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in response to updated EPA standards for PFAS levels in drinking water.

To date, the Air Force has spent nearly $59 million at Wright-Patterson to identify and mitigate PFAS, part of a $2.2 billion nationwide effort.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals” for their persistence in the environment, have been found above guideline levels at three wells on the base.

The Air Force has initiated a remedial investigation to fully delineate PFAS presence in soil, groundwater, and surface water.

Twenty-six AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) release sites at Wright-Patterson have been investigated under the EPA’s Superfund process.

Over 170 monitoring wells have been installed, and extensive sampling has been conducted, including 480 soil samples and 313 groundwater samples.

In response to the new EPA standards, which require public water utilities to test for six types of PFAS, the Air Force has installed carbon treatment systems on two on-base wells.

The service is also implementing removal actions at five on-base locations to prevent PFAS migration to Dayton’s water supply wells.

Dayton has sued Wright-Patterson and the U.S. Department of Defense for $300 million over PFAS contamination, with the case now part of a multi-district litigation in South Carolina.

The Air Force’s efforts include providing alternative drinking water, funding filtration system installations, and implementing interim response actions to prevent further PFAS migration in groundwater.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Recent investigations reveal widespread contamination of U.S. drinking water systems with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), affecting states including North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts.

These chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and pose significant health risks, including liver changes, increased cholesterol, and heightened risks of kidney and testicular cancer.

Some states are considering stricter PFAS regulations:

• North Carolina: Over 2.5 million residents are exposed to PFAS levels exceeding EPA standards, with significant contamination in Wilmington and Pittsboro. Efforts to address the issue are entangled in political and economic debates.
• Pennsylvania: Reports indicate that nearly 19% of water systems contain PFAS concentrations above federal limits. The most severe contamination is noted in Brookside Village Mobile Home Park, surpassing both state and federal standards.
• Massachusetts: A substantial number of public water systems show PFAS levels higher than federal guidelines, with Eastern Massachusetts showing a higher concentration.
• Residents of New Jersey are among 89.3 million people nationwide who have drinking water that has tested positive for toxic “forever chemicals”.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a directive to the U.S. Air Force and Arizona National Guard to address groundwater contamination in Tucson, Arizona, particularly near Tucson International Airport.

Groundwater near the airport is contaminated due to the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), which have been found in dangerously high concentrations, significantly exceeding safety limits.

PFAS contamination poses serious public health risks due to its hazardous effects, including alterations in liver enzymes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and an increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer.

The contamination was traced back to military properties, prompting the EPA’s demand for a comprehensive cleanup.

Recent tests at the Tucson Airport Remediation Project (TARP) area revealed PFAS levels as high as 53,000 parts per trillion—over 5,000 times above the allowable threshold for drinking water, which ranges from 4 to 10 parts per trillion.

In response, the EPA has given the responsible military bases 60 days to devise a remediation plan to halt the further spread of these contaminants and to safeguard the city’s groundwater resources.

Tucson Water highlighted the financial and resource burdens this contamination imposes on the community, stressing the importance of groundwater as a critical, yet finite, resource for the city.

Additionally, the city has shifted the use of water from TARP to non-drinking purposes to support environmental restoration along the Santa Cruz River, reinforcing public confidence in the safety of Tucson’s drinking water.

The remediation efforts, as outlined by the EPA, will require significant technological interventions, possibly including the construction of new treatment facilities or the expansion of existing ones.

Technologies such as granular activated carbon filtration are being considered to effectively remove PFAS from the water, ensuring it meets health standards for future use as drinking water.

This directive comes against a backdrop of long-standing environmental challenges in the area, which involve a variety of pollutants that have contaminated soil and water due to historical defense and industrial activities.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

U.S. manufacturing and chemical industry groups, led by the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Chemistry Council, have filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Filed on June 11, 2024, the lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenges the EPA’s new rule that establishes the first-ever drinking water standards for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

PFAS chemicals are commonly used in numerous industries and products, including transformers for electric grids, components in clean energy technologies like semiconductors and solar panels, and aircraft and fire suppression systems.

The EPA’s regulation is projected to affect between 6% and 10% of the 66,000 public drinking water systems in the United States, impacting roughly 100 million people by reducing exposure to these harmful chemicals.

The National Association of Manufacturers and the American Chemistry Council argues that the EPA’s rule is “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion” and assert that it exceeds the agency’s authority granted under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974.

The lawsuit follows closely on the heels of a similar challenge by two associations representing water utilities, which contend that the EPA’s rule does not rely on the best available science.

In 2023, litigation against chemical companies over PFAS contamination led to $11 billion in settlements

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

PFAS contamination in water is a nationwide concern.

Regulatory actions and developments have resulted in more and more communities testing their public drinking water sources for PFAS chemicals.

Recent news around the U.S. are:

• City Utilities (CU) in Springfield, Missouri, is suing 3M for PFAS contamination of the James River, alleging violations of the Clean Water Act due to the company’s Springfield plant operations.

The lawsuit addresses PFAS pollution in the city’s water sources, which exceeds new EPA regulatory limits, and claims 3M failed to adequately report PFAS levels despite measures to mitigate contamination.

• Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha has filed a lawsuit against several manufacturers including 3M and DuPont, for widespread PFAS contamination affecting the state’s natural resources and public health.

The lawsuit seeks damages for the extensive environmental and health impacts caused by PFAS, which have been found near military and industrial sites across Rhode Island.

• Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) filed a lawsuit against the EPA for failing to prevent PFAS contamination from treated sewage sludge used as fertilizer, which has led to widespread damage to farmland and community health.
• In Texas, farmers and ranchers have sued the EPA over its inadequate regulation of PFAS in biosolids, claiming significant damage to their land and livelihoods.
• The Portland Water District in Maine is suing 18 companies, including DuPont and 3M, to recover costs related to PFAS contamination in wastewater.

This lawsuit is part of a broader initiative, which includes plans for a new treatment facility projected to cost between $150 million and $250 million.

• The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association is considering suing the EPA for failing to regulate PFAS-contaminated sludge used as fertilizer, arguing that existing studies are sufficient for regulatory action and emphasizing the need for protective measures for farmers and communities.

These cases highlight ongoing legal and environmental challenges related to PFAS contamination and the efforts by communities and states to hold corporations and regulatory bodies accountable.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Recent findings from environmental testing in the state of Washington reveal concerning levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in private wells, particularly in the West Plains area near Spokane.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern to public health due to its hazardous health effects, such as changes in liver enzymes, Pregnancy-induced hypertension, and Kidney and testicular cancer.

This data prompted the West Plains Water Coalition to organize a public event slated for June 3, 2024, aimed at discussing the latest updates on PFAS contamination and its link to a potential cancer cluster in the region.

In 2017, Fairchild Air Force Base disclosed the presence of PFAS—often called “forever chemicals” due to their persistent nature—in the local water supplies of Airway Heights, Medical Lake, and nearby areas.

Despite efforts over the years, the contamination remains unresolved, compelling the city of Airway Heights to procure clean drinking water from Spokane’s different aquifer.

The event will feature key speakers such as Jennifer Sabel, Manager of the Environmental Epidemiology Section, who will present findings from a cancer cluster analysis related to PFAS exposure.

The state initiated tests in March on hundreds of private wells, revealing that over half contain PFAS levels exceeding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

State and federal lawmakers are looking to push more stringent regulations on the use and environmental impact of PFAS chemicals.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern in environmental and public health due to its hazardous health effects, such as increases in cholesterol levels, Lower antibody response to some vaccines, Changes in liver enzymes, Pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia, and Kidney and testicular cancer.

The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (MOFGA) is pursuing legal action to push for federal regulation of sewage sludge used in agriculture after PFAS contamination was found on a local dairy farm.

This contamination traces back to sludge applied over a decade ago, prompting Maine to tighten its regulations.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been criticized for its slow response to PFAS risks and plans only to assess the risks of two PFAS compounds this year.

This has been seen as insufficient by advocacy groups due to the EPA’s historical reluctance to enforce stricter sludge regulations.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to review the EPA’s new regulations on PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals.”

These regulations impact 6% to 10% of the U.S.’s 66,000 public drinking water systems.

The current lawsuit argues that these regulations are too vague, providing no clear standards for permissible PFAS levels, leading to uncertainty about compliance among water providers.

PFAS in consumer products is also a glaring issue.

Some consumer products that have been recently found to contain PFAS include the following:

• PFAS were detected in some store-bought milk from tests on 50 samples across five states, revealing traces of harmful chemicals that lack federal regulatory guidelines in food
• BIC Inc. faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly failing to disclose the presence of PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” in the lubricated strips of some of their razors, the lawsuit cites fraud and negligence
• PFASs are also known to be found in food packaging and other food contact articles (FCAs) used in the production, processing, transport, handling, and storage of foods

Our law firm is currently focused on personal injury claims related to water contamination from PFAS, specifically in areas close to military bases and other similar operations.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Documents obtained from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggest the agency may have provided false information about harmful contaminants in pesticides, according to allegations from a coalition and a former EPA researcher.

The claims follow a May 2023 press release in which the EPA stated it found no per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in certain insecticides.

This statement contradicted a study by the former EPA researcher that identified PFAS in the same products.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern in environmental and public health due to its hazardous effects, accurate testing for PFAS is critical for regulating exposure.

The group, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), obtained pesticide testing data from the EPA through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

These documents revealed that the EPA found PFAS in the tested products, contradicting its earlier public statement.

The study found perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), a type of PFAS, in six out of 10 insecticides used in agriculture.

The EPA, declining to comment on the pending formal complaint process, previously stated its commitment to addressing PFAS contamination, having recently finalized drinking water limits for PFAS and classifying certain types as hazardous substances.

The EPA’s internal documents, however, revealed that the agency had conducted four tests on pesticide samples but publicly disclosed only two.

One of the undisclosed tests detected PFAS.

The controversy raises questions about the integrity of the EPA’s testing methods and the influence of external pressures on its scientific reporting.

The group accuses the EPA of scientific and ethical misconduct.

Additionally, the EPA could soon face a lawsuit for not protecting farmers from “forever chemicals.”

Farmers in the Northeast are pushing the EPA to set federal standards for PFAS levels in biosolids, a fertilizer byproduct of treated sewage known to contain these harmful chemicals.

With state regulations on PFAS scarce, the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association argues that individual state actions are insufficient to tackle widespread contamination, urging for immediate federal intervention to ensure biosolid safety.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a lawsuit instantly.

The New York Times has reported that the plastics industry expects an impending flood of litigation concerning per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), potentially surpassing the scope of asbestos-related cases.

During a conference for major plastic manufacturers earlier this year, industry executives were warned to brace for legal challenges that could involve “astronomical” financial repercussions.

According to the New York Times report, industry attorneys highlighted the urgency of reviewing corporate communications and preparing robust legal defenses in anticipation of widespread claims.

PFAS, often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ due to their persistent nature in the environment, have been utilized for decades in various consumer products like cosmetics, cookware, firefighting foams, and more.

PFAS chemicals are now linked to significant health risks, including cancer and liver disease, and have been found in the blood of nearly all Americans.

The federal government has recently taken steps to mitigate PFAS risks, mandating the removal of certain types from drinking water and designating them as hazardous substances under the Superfund law.

This shift in the regulatory landscape is likely to further lawsuits from water utilities and communities seeking to recover purification costs and damages.

Legal experts compare the potential scale of PFAS litigation to historical public health lawsuits, with predictions that it could ultimately exceed the combined impacts of past litigation related to tobacco, asbestos, and MTBE—a harmful gasoline additive.

This escalation arrives as manufacturers, including major entities like DuPont and 3M, face increasing pressure over their roles in PFAS production and pollution.

Our law firm is currently investigating cases of PFAS contamination and resulting health conditions in exposed populations.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.

PFAS Lawsuits concerning the contamination of local water supplies are ongoing, and personal injury claims for exposure to PFAS-containing firefighting foam are progressing in multidistrict litigation (MDL). 

BASF, a German chemical company, has agreed to a $316.5 million settlement with several U.S. public water systems over claims that its firefighting foam contaminated water supplies with toxic PFAS chemicals.

BASF is among nearly two dozen chemical companies that have faced lawsuits brought by water systems over PFAS pollution in sprawling litigation that has been centralized in a South Carolina federal court.

PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in nature or the human body, are linked to several health issues, including cancer.

PFAS chemicals are found in a wide range of products, such as firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, and stain-resistant materials.

Under the terms of the settlement, BASF will pay an initial $4 million in July and an additional $312.5 million in March 2025.

BASF has stated that this settlement does not imply any admission of liability or wrongdoing and plans to seek reimbursement through its insurance policies.

This settlement comes amidst ongoing extensive litigation involving nearly two dozen chemical manufacturers in a federal court in South Carolina, focusing on both groundwater contamination from PFAS and direct exposure to AFFF.

In 2023, similar lawsuits resulted in over $11 billion in settlements between U.S. water systems and major chemical companies, including 3M, Chemours, Corteva, DuPont de Nemours, and Johnson Controls.

In addition to legal actions, PFAS chemicals have increasingly been the subject of stringent regulatory measures in the U.S., with the Environmental Protection Agency recently establishing national drinking water standards and designating certain PFAS compounds as hazardous under the Superfund program.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, contact us for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit immediately.

Decades ago, Hansen, a chemist at 3M, discovered PFAS in human blood samples, a finding that contradicted claims of safety made by her superiors and 3M’s external presentations.

3M, a conglomerate known for products like Scotch Tape and Post-it notes, is now facing backlash for its handling of PFAS, which are components in products such as Scotchgard and Scotchban.

The internal conflict began in 1997 when Hansen was tasked by her supervisor to validate external lab findings that unexpectedly detected PFAS in general population blood samples.

Hansen and her team ultimately found PFOS in eagles, chickens, rabbits, cows, pigs, and other animals, they also found 14 ­additional fluorochemicals in human blood, including several produced by 3M, and some were present in wastewater from a 3M factory.

Hansen’s confirmation of these findings led to a suppression of her work and a series of corporate maneuvers that kept these toxicological risks hidden from the public and regulatory bodies.

Despite internal studies from decades prior that showed the toxicity of PFAS, 3M continued to produce and promote these chemicals.

It wasn’t until the late 1990s that 3M disclosed to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that PFAS was indeed widespread in blood samples across the U.S.

However, the company downplayed the potential risks.

Legal consequences for 3M have escalated as the understanding of PFAS’s environmental and health impacts has grown.

Regulatory pressures and litigation risks have prompted 3M to announce a planned phase-out of PFAS manufacturing by 2025.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are notorious environmental contaminants, often found in water supplies across various regions.

These chemicals stem from several sources, including industrial facilities, fire-fighting foams, and consumer products like textiles and furnishing.

PFAS are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in water systems through multiple pathways such as industrial discharges, atmospheric deposition, and leaching from soil.

Recent research has highlighted the significant role of atmospheric deposition in contaminating the Great Lakes with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).

This study indicates that PFAS, due to their persistence and ability to travel long distances, are found in varying concentrations across the lakes.

PFAS contamination is human-made, not natural.

These chemicals have been widely used in various industrial applications and consumer products, such as firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, and more.

Their presence in the environment results from both direct discharges and atmospheric deposition, leading to widespread contamination, including in aquatic systems like the Great Lakes.

Our lawyers are actively addressing PFAS contamination throughout the nation.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly. 

San Francisco is on the brink of becoming the first city in the United States to ban firefighter clothing manufactured with PFAS.

Local lawmakers are expected to pass an ordinance prohibiting the use of protective equipment made with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

The Environmental Protection Agency states that PFAS can be ingested or absorbed through the skin, posing significant health risks, including higher cancer rates, decreased fertility, and developmental delays in children.

PFAS were traditionally used in nonstick, fire-proof, and stain-resistant products but have been largely phased out of U.S. manufacturing, except in firefighting foam and firefighter uniforms.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously supported the ban last week, and a final vote is anticipated soon.

Once enacted, the law will mandate that the city’s fire department purchase PFAS-free protective clothing for over 1,400 firefighters by June 30, 2026.

The exact exposure levels of PFAS in firefighter uniforms remain under study, but firefighting is already classified as carcinogenic by the World Health Organization due to other hazardous exposures.

The San Francisco Fire Department has lost over 300 firefighters to cancer in the past 20 years.

New PFAS-free turnouts are being tested by 11 San Francisco firefighters as part of a national trial by the International Association of Fire Fighters.

The estimated cost for PFAS-free turnout gear is $3,400 per set, totaling $10.1 million for the city, a cost deemed justified compared to the health and lives of firefighters.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated two chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, part of the broader PFAS category, as hazardous substances under the Superfund law on April 19, 2024.

This designation requires immediate reporting of these chemicals when released into the environment and enables the EPA to mandate cleanups to protect public health while ensuring guilty parties bear the cleanup costs.

Historically, PFOA and PFOS have been used in a range of consumer products and industrial applications, including nonstick cookware and firefighting foams.

The Superfund status does not impose a ban on PFOA and PFOS but facilitates more rigorous and swift cleanup and cost recovery.

This measure follows a broader regulatory trend, including recent EPA limits on PFAS in drinking water, aimed at significantly reducing public exposure and preventing associated health risks.

The American Chemistry Council has criticized the Superfund designation, arguing it could complicate effective remediation due to the complexity and cost.

Despite this, recent settlements, including a $1.18 billion agreement by major chemical manufacturers to address PFAS contamination in drinking water, indicate a shift towards accountability for historical pollution.

Although U.S. production has ceased, these compounds remain environmentally persistent, posing significant health risks, such as cancer and liver damage.

This regulatory action aligns with findings from the National Academies of Science, emphasizing the severe health impacts of PFAS and advocating for stronger measures to manage pollution.

The EPA’s enforcement strategy will target major contributors to PFAS pollution, exempting entities like local fire departments and water utilities.

The designation represents a significant advancement in environmental regulation, prioritizing public health and holding persistent polluters accountable.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established the first national limits on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water.

These regulations target six specific types of PFAS, commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and

This is one of the most significant regulatory measures aimed at curbing the widespread environmental and health risks associated with PFAS.

According to the new guidelines, the levels of two prevalent PFAS types (PFOA and PFOS) are capped at 4 parts per trillion in public drinking water systems, and an additional three chemicals—PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX—have been set to a limit of 10 parts per trillion.

PFAS have been extensively used in products like nonstick cookware and firefighting foam, leading to their persistence in the environment and potential health implications for the public.

Despite being largely phased out, PFAS’ enduring presence in ecosystems continues to pose severe health risks, evidenced by the high prevalence of PFAS in the bloodstreams of most Americans.

The EPA’s actions are projected to necessitate modifications in 4,100 to 6,700 public water systems across the country, which serve approximately 100 million people.

These systems are mandated to initiate PFAS monitoring within three years and, if necessary, implement technological upgrades to comply with the new standards within the subsequent two years.

Numerous public water systems have pursued litigation against PFAS manufacturers, seeking to recover costs associated with mitigating these chemicals’ impacts.

These lawsuits have led to substantial settlements, including a recent $1.18 billion agreement benefitting 300 water providers nationwide.

The EPA’s initiative, backed by $1 billion in federal funding for state and territorial PFAS management, signals a federal commitment to addressing and remediating the pervasive issue of PFAS contamination.

While this regulatory step is monumental, it addresses only a fraction of the over 12,000 known PFAS types, indicating that the path toward comprehensive management of these chemicals will take time.

If you’ve been exposed to PFAS and developed related health problems, you may be eligible to file a claim. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Recent testing has revealed the presence of PFAS, known as forever chemicals, in bandages from major brands including Band-Aid and Curad.

These chemicals, linked to numerous health risks including cancer, were found in 65 percent of bandages tested, with some containing over 180 parts per million organic fluorine.

Scientific research has shown that PFAS can enter the bloodstream after a person drinks water or eats food laced with the chemical, and once in the bloodstream, PFAS can accumulate within healthy tissue, potentially causing damage to the immune system, liver, kidneys, and other organs.

The discovery of PFAS in bandages raises concerns about the use of forever chemicals in consumer products, and calls for the industry to seek PFAS-free alternatives.

​​If you or a loved one have developed health problems related to PFAS exposure, you may be eligible for legal action. 

Contact our law firm to learn more about PFAS Exposure Lawsuits, AFFF Lawsuits, and other legal actions for exposure to forever chemicals. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

3M has agreed to a multi-billion-dollar settlement over the contamination of U.S. public drinking water systems with PFAS, known as “forever chemicals.”

A federal court gave final approval to the settlement, with a total payment ranging between $10.5 billion and $12.5 billion to be distributed between about 300 communities impacted by PFAS contamination.

This settlement follows an $850 million agreement with the State of Minnesota in 2018 for water and environmental contamination.

PFAS, used in various consumer products for their nonstick and resistant properties, have been linked to health issues including liver damage, immune system diseases, and cancer.

The settlement will compensate water providers for PFAS pollution, fund water system contaminant filtration, and support additional systems in testing for PFAS.

Some of the settlement money will help additional water systems test for contamination from PFAS.

If you or a loved one is suffering from the negative effects of PFAS contamination, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.

New data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revealed that over 70 million Americans consume water from systems contaminated with toxic PFAS chemicals.

The EPA’s ongoing five-year survey of water systems indicates this number is likely to increase with quarterly updates.

Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals” due to their resistance to degradation, pose significant health risks, including cancer, even at minimal exposure levels.

These substances are prevalent in various products and industries, accumulating in the environment and human bodies.

PFAS are called “forever chemicals” as they accumulate in the environment without breaking down, causing them to be an ongoing environmental concern.

Major cities like Salt Lake City, Sacramento, Madison (WI), and Louisville have reported PFAS contamination.

The EPA’s analysis found 1,245 of approximately 3,800 water systems tested contain PFAS levels above the agency’s reported thresholds.

The EPA plans to extend this testing to include major systems like those in Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia by 2026.

Currently, the U.S. lacks enforceable national drinking water standards for PFAS, but the EPA has proposed the first-ever standards for six specific PFAS production methods or uses,

Communities across the US face the challenge of eliminating these contaminants to safeguard public health.

The upcoming EPA regulations may shift enforcement focus towards primary polluters, yet many water utilities might struggle with the financial and technical demands of implementing advanced treatment systems.

Cities like Sacramento and Salt Lake City express concerns about adapting to these regulations amidst varying climate conditions and water source availability.

For example, Sacramento’s reliance on river and groundwater sources complicates treatment processes, especially with state guidelines already creating a need for the shutdown of certain groundwater sources due to PFAS contamination.

Similarly, Salt Lake City’s dependance on surface and groundwater resources, crucial during droughts, faces threats from PFAS pollution, emphasizing the significant impact on water scarcity in the western United States.

Individuals exposed to PFAS can face various health issues, including:

• Cancer
• Immune System Effects
• Thyroid Disease
• Reproductive Issues
• Developmental Effects
• Cholesterol Levels
• Liver Damage

If you or a loved one is suffering from the negative effects of PFAS contamination, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free consultation. 

UN experts stated that American chemical companies DuPont and Chemours have released toxic PFAS into the environment near the lower Cape Fear River in North Carolina, disregarding resident’s rights and health.

These “forever chemicals”, found in personal care products, plastics, and other items, persist in nature for long periods of time and can bioaccumulate in humans posing significant health risks.

Experts criticized DuPont and Chemours for knowingly producing and profiting from PFAS despite being aware of its harmful effects.

They urged the UN Environment Assembly to address the global issue of PFAS contamination.

Additionally, experts raised concerns about the export of PFAS-hazardous waste from The Netherlands to the United States, pointing to a violation of international law.

Dupont and Chemours were also accused of influencing the US Environmental Protection Agency to delay regulation of PFAS, impacting affected communities’ right to information and remedy.

The experts expressed alarm over reports of Chemours seeking an air permit to expand PFAS production in North Carolina and criticized the companies for spreading misinformation about PFAS benefits in decarbonization efforts.

Individuals affected by PFAS contamination have the right to seek legal action against DuPont and Chemours.

If you or someone you know has been affected by PFAS contamination, it’s crucial to seek legal assistance and hold these companies accountable. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, don’t hesitate to take action to protect your rights and health. 

The EPA has reached an agreement with Chemours regarding PFAS contamination originating from a facility in West Virginia.

Chemours will conduct testing for toxic PFAS chemicals in soil, surface water, sediment, groundwater, and waste streams near the Washington Works plant.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” are linked to health risks and have various industrial uses.

The EPA aims to assess contamination’s impact and create plans to address environmental damage.

This development follows a settlement in which DuPont and two of its subsidiaries were ordered to pay $110 million to Ohio over environmental threats from chemicals used at Washington Works.

​​If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible for legal action. 

TorHoerman Law offers free, confidential, and no-obligation case consultations to all potential clients.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.

Numerous U.S. cities, towns, and water districts have raised objections to proposed class action settlements totaling over $11 billion with chemical companies such as 3M and DuPont.

They argue that these settlements are too favorable to the accused chemical companies, which are accused of contaminating U.S. water with toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS.

The objections, filed by 22 government entities in various states, including New York, Texas, and California, assert that the settlements will not adequately cover cleanup and legal costs faced by water providers dealing with PFAS pollution.

The objections primarily target a proposed $10.3 billion settlement between 3M and U.S. water providers, as well as a separate $1.19 billion settlement involving DuPont and spin-off companies Corteva and Chemours.

Many of the objecting parties argue that the settlement terms are too broad and could release the companies from future liability related to PFAS pollution and personal injury claims.

They assert that the proposed funds are insufficient to address the scope of the problem.

The attorneys who negotiated these settlements on behalf of U.S. water providers have taken the objections seriously and believe that many concerns have already been addressed.

DuPont and 3M have also responded to the objections, expressing confidence in the settlements’ merits.

These objections come amid ongoing lawsuits against 3M, DuPont, and other companies over PFAS contamination.

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, overseeing thousands of these lawsuits, had granted preliminary approval for the two settlements in August.

The DuPont settlement is set for a final fairness hearing in December, while the 3M settlement will undergo a final review in February.

​​If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible for legal action. 

TorHoerman Law offers free, confidential, and no-obligation case consultations to all potential clients.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.